Constitutional Law: 1st Amendment Free Speech (Pt. 3.3) - Obscenity under Miller v. California

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @juliemarie2490
    @juliemarie2490 2 года назад +1

    I literally love this guy.

  • @zima627
    @zima627 Год назад

    Hearing Mike talk about porn on a Monday, who knew my day would end this way

  • @forrestfireart866
    @forrestfireart866 Год назад

    What's the logic behind the statements around 16:00?

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 Год назад

    ... Not to mention the leggings showing camel toe when the honorable elders wearing the same store bought clothes in your society still don't accept skinny jeans, leggings, or tiktok leggings.

  • @DonnyBrook762
    @DonnyBrook762 2 года назад

    Because law is in a constant of evolution, wouldn't the definition of obscenity evolve too?

    • @kenlandon6130
      @kenlandon6130 2 года назад

      yes

    • @kenlandon6130
      @kenlandon6130 2 года назад

      it's tied to local standards of "morality" so what is obscene in one area may not be in another and what is obscene in one time may not be in another

    • @SpartanLawyer
      @SpartanLawyer Год назад +1

      Yeah, but you’d have to use the current test and definition on a law exam. The Miller test is the current one.