Also please note that many if not all features mentioned here, are entirely optional when qualifying a Bluetooth 6.0 device. So the 6.0 sticker doesn't guarantee available features on a given device
omg can those standards committees stop with with making all requirements optional already. No one needs to step into the footsteps of the shitshow that is USB.
In a sense I can agree with them, in that a smart fridge probably won't need to implement the bluetooth location finder thing, but perhaps these optional features should become mandatory in certain device categories.
@@Idiomatick But then the printer also doesn't need Bluetooth 6. It should just use 5, it's backwards compatible anyways. Why does it need the version number 6 if it doesn't have anything that separates it from v5?
@@rainbowsquash673Yuk, cd’s are sooooo draconian. I much prefer the far superior quality sound of watching the band or artist record at a music studio in person
If it's compressed, then it's no longer lossless. This is called lossy compression. Currently the best one is LDAC that at 990KB/s is the least lossy out of all but places serious strain on battery and range. Also availability is limited. Sony who developed it uses it the most.
Bluetooth is that one wireless tech that’s been a foundational necessity for decades but has also evolved at a snail’s pace compared to everything else wireless. Kinda like consumer ethernet standards.
I think, the complete lack of progress on ethernet speeds is caused by two things. First is, consumers use Wi-Fi. Wireless is more convenient and mostly work as advertised. The second reason is probably the unfortunate relevant one. Network storage industry players like EMC, HP, NetApp and the likes undermining innovations in favour of their respective proprietary fibre-optics solutions for enterprises. That is a trillion dollar business they do not want to give up to some "open" and "free to use" standard.
Bluetooth LE audio with the LC3 codec is supposed to improve call quality as well. There are already headphones that support that. I have not heard of any with drastically improved call quality though
We are still using Bluetooth 2.0 for Audio and 1.0 for Hands Free (aka audio with microphone). Bluetooth 5.0 brought LE-Audio and I'm not sure there is a single implementation of it yet.
Devices compatible with Bluetooth LE Audio include the Google Pixel 7/8, Samsung Galaxy S23, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Galaxy Z Flip 4 smartphones. When it comes to headphones the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, OnePlus Buds Pro 2 and Earfun Air Pro 3 true wireless earbuds are also confirmed to support it.
@@G0A7 Are you sure they actually use it? Or is it just the radio that implements the 5.2 spec. Because it would mean massive differences in how they work. LE-Audio is connectionless, has lower bitrate than classic radio and only supports one codec. I have no idea if it even supports bi-directional audio or if it is just broadcasting, like most LE-Radio stuff.
@@marcopfeiffer3032I am very curious about this as well, as proper documentation is nonexistent and the list of devices that even try to claim anything is extremely slim. What I will say tho is that connecting my buds2 pro/ buds3 pro to a PC or mac sounds noticeably worse than using them with my s23 (which claims to be using LE audio)
@@TheRybka30 That may well be but that is usually the case because some headset manufacturers use different EQ settings for different codecs. Android usually has the broadest bluetooth codec support. I would expect LE-Audio to sound worse, because the bitrate is much lower and the fixed codec is something specific to LE-Audio. But I haven't actually heard it yet and I'm also not that picky about audio compression. It just has to sound good.
@@Tatsuki09ye, I have S23+ and I can connect it to 2 pairs of headphones, but to be fair it's kinda annoying when you borrow a family member's headphones. My mom has S21+ and it constantly connects to my bluetooth headphones too
Receive and transmit at full quality to make wireless headphones not sound like a phone call is all I care about… guess I’ll be waiting another 8 years
@@rainbowsquash673 Depends on your use case really. I prefer to be able to walk around the house and use them but when at the desk wired is for sure better. Basically wireless is for convenience and wired for audio quality but that by no means makes wireless headphones bad (even though most aren't great).
@@triadwarfare Obviously it can be fixed. Not for old devices, but like codecs and other bluetooth features, it can simply be turned on if both devices advertise that they support it. Plenty of bluetooth features have been added in a backwards-compatible way like that. Honestly, I wouldn't even mind not supporting the legacy dual-mode thing on new devices. It's so bad that it isn't usable anyways.
In fact, Samsung adopted and used UWB long before Apple. It's just the usual NA based reality distortion field in action. That said, it is probably nice to see this feature being integrated into BT instead of requiring separate radios.
My only wish is for manufacturers to finally support LE-Audio everywhere! You have research for that feature to know, if there's even the possibility for it to exist.
Nothing for the audio?? WTH! The most important improvement needed to be in the minimum audio quality transmission and reception which should have been quite high.
Samsung delivers proper lossless 24-bit audio over Bluetooth 5. It is possible, you just have to be good at it. :) Only on their own and some AKG headphones, though. But, still. AKG is a Samsung company, so technically also their own headphones. Samsung has also been providing their own low-latency audio on BT for years. Allowing gaming audio on their headphones. They've always pushed BT innovation to the limits. The first time they delivered lossless 16-bit audio was about a decade ago. Apple still can't do 16-bit audio on their 600 buck "pro" headphones to this date.
switching from BT 5.0 to 5.4 alrady felt like a HUGE leap, I hope that the leap from 5.4 to 6.0 is actually even bigger than that and not just marketing
@@tim3172HSP/HFP is a Bluetooth profile for bidirectional audio that is used when you're actively recording through a Bluetooth device due to A2DP only supporting undirectional audio. HSP/HFP CVSD is capped at 8KHz, and HFP mSBC is capped at 16KHz. Both sample rates are significantly lower compared to even SBC which is 44KHz so yes, it pretty much is a Bluetooth issue.
My current bluetooth headphones transmit sound slower than my monitor image. I feel like knowing the future when my game queue pops on the screen, and then moments after, the sound reaches my ears.
What are the differences between BT 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 without looking it up? If you have to look it up anyway, what difference does the "name" make?
All I want from a Smart lock is it to tell me if it is currently locked or not. I don't want it to have the ability to remotely unlock. If it can unlock remotely, even if you have to be 2 meters or closer, that still means that eventually a nefarious method will be found/created of unlocking it, by someone who shouldn't. Physical mechanical locks are the only locks I can trust long term. And I use trust to mean that they will work the same way, have the same weaknesses from the day I buy them to the day I replace them. A lock that has a way of remotely unlocking will eventually have an exploit created that renders the remote features as more of a liability than a convenience. A physical lock can be picked, but I buy it knowing that from the beginning, and other that just destroying the lock entirely, or completely bypassing the lock altogether, that will always be the only weakness.
The problem is that 2.45 GHz is pretty much the only ISM band that's the same across all countries (meaning Bluetooth devices can be sold as-is everywhere). 900 MHz isn't available in Europe, 5.8 GHz has different cutouts in different countries (only 5150-5350 is safe across all countries, but restricted to indoors use in most countries, and that's going to be used by 5 GHz Wi-Fi a lot of the time), 6 GHz is even worse in that regard, and range goes down as you go up in frequency, so 24 GHz and up would barely let you get 10 meters away from the antenna before you lose signal. 2.45 GHz means Bluetooth devices don't face country-specific restrictions on usage, and you don't need to reconfigure your phone and earbuds based on the country you're in.
Finally I can stream Call of duty zombies on my ipod touch without having my teammates leave due to loss of Bluetooth connection 😢 It only took 12 years
All variant of Bluetooth 5 exhibit major sound delay and wifi disruption when you use wireless subwoofer, wifi hotspot and wifi connection at nearby connectivity.
Still got an issue with modern Bluetooth, in the old times you never had an issue with playing music. And now in these 8 years you hear the music stop for 0,5 seconds and then it goes again
Can you do an updated video on ram? On the latest tech, is there a performance difference between dual and quad channel ram? How much ram is recommended today?
0:40 how is this not already done o_O a TACAN will tell an aircraft how far away it is from it via the same priciple, and its from the 50s. 1:00 again, how is this not a thing already for moving blue tooth devices. I figrued accounting for doppler to be a requirement for percise wireless timing. This principle is how speed guns work.
So I am pretty happy with 5.0 with less or no lag anymore. The tracking stuff is not really a game changer, and the screen yanks most of my power from my phone anyhow.
So this ia the first bt version with serious relevant chamge since 4.0? (Other than the one that lets me maybe connect two headsets if phone plays nice.)
Cool but can it run full quality audio and microphone to my PC? Choosing between stereo and mono+handsfree (mic) is ridiculous in 2024! Its a$200 headset - FIGURE IT OUT! Also when at it lets put in some work on Windows Bluetooth
When fix for terrible sound quality while using mic simultaneously? BT is still inferior when it comes to sound quality, and bt headphones are still much more expensive than wired counterparts, if speaking about relatively same sound quality. I guess nothing is really changed in bt except for a bit better this and that, and a bit better latency situation
Two things. 1. You are in Canada so that would be Molson Canadian. 2. Proximity means close. So saying "close proximity" is redundant, as if saying "close close".
Samsung's smart tag plus also has UWB, and has been around since before air tags. It also has a built in hole lol. I know it's likely that nobody cares, but there we are.
Until they add support for STEREO AUDIO + MIC channel to the bluetooth spec...I won't use it. You can either have mono-audio+mic, or stereo audio, but not both at the same time.
decision based advertising filtering sounds like it would be easy to abuse to make other people's devices ignore channels that it would/should otherwise be listening to
![[RANT] Why Bluetooth SUCKS](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e3eVykPNGVg/mqdefault.jpg)
Some respect for the Bluetooth team to not name it Bluetooth 5.4 Version 2.
Bluetooth 5.4 Version 2 Gen 2*
Skipping Gen 1 completely because.. idk
the bar is in hell
@@ashyouknow7420 🤣 Bluetooth SuperSpeed 5.4 Gen 2 2x2
Was looking for this comment to save me from typing it! 😉🔥
I wish the Attack on Titan Creators were like that...
Also please note that many if not all features mentioned here, are entirely optional when qualifying a Bluetooth 6.0 device. So the 6.0 sticker doesn't guarantee available features on a given device
omg can those standards committees stop with with making all requirements optional already. No one needs to step into the footsteps of the shitshow that is USB.
@@Fiyaaaahh I'm not sure I need cm precision tracking of my printer.
In a sense I can agree with them, in that a smart fridge probably won't need to implement the bluetooth location finder thing, but perhaps these optional features should become mandatory in certain device categories.
@@Idiomatick But then the printer also doesn't need Bluetooth 6. It should just use 5, it's backwards compatible anyways. Why does it need the version number 6 if it doesn't have anything that separates it from v5?
@@Idiomatick it can still ship with 5.2, its not like you need 6.0 to send 4MB of data for each page
Riley, could You make a video to explain Bluetooth tech advancing from v 1.0 to recent, how it's been evolving?
I was just searching this yesterday unironically. A simple google search would suffice tho
@@JohnDoe-iv5ns You realize most of the TeckQuickie videos could be replaced with a quick search, no?
Not Riley, he is Linus
+++
I'd also like to know
Hi, I'm from the future. We still use Bluetooth 5
Im from farther in the future we now use 5.2
hey, so at least we finally moved on from bluetooth 2.0
@@reniervandermerwe I'm from right now and I use 5.3
Nooo
I’m from the furthest in the future and Bluer-Tooth 7 just dropped. The signal distance is still the same
I just want Bluetooth to be able to pass lossless compression, high fidelity audio.
@@rainbowsquash673Yuk, cd’s are sooooo draconian. I much prefer the far superior quality sound of watching the band or artist record at a music studio in person
@@rainbowsquash673 Shame, i love to get a box of cds with me every time i go to work it's so much more convenient that disgusting Bluetooth headphone
If it's compressed, then it's no longer lossless. This is called lossy compression.
Currently the best one is LDAC that at 990KB/s is the least lossy out of all but places serious strain on battery and range. Also availability is limited. Sony who developed it uses it the most.
It already does with aptX lossless
@@Raivo_K So FLAC (free lossless audio compression) is lossy ???????????????????????????????????????
Bluetooth is that one wireless tech that’s been a foundational necessity for decades but has also evolved at a snail’s pace compared to everything else wireless.
Kinda like consumer ethernet standards.
Kinda like Bic Pens
@@ManMpha If it works, it works.
Kinda like battery tech
@@hellawolfdefinitely this!
I think, the complete lack of progress on ethernet speeds is caused by two things. First is, consumers use Wi-Fi. Wireless is more convenient and mostly work as advertised.
The second reason is probably the unfortunate relevant one. Network storage industry players like EMC, HP, NetApp and the likes undermining innovations in favour of their respective proprietary fibre-optics solutions for enterprises. That is a trillion dollar business they do not want to give up to some "open" and "free to use" standard.
That literal audio latency improvement at 4:50. Bravo the editor!
Cool but when are we getting high quality handsfree/headset mode?
The new galaxy buds 3 support it with galaxy phones, but I don't know if that's actually part of the spec
Bluetooth LE audio with the LC3 codec is supposed to improve call quality as well. There are already headphones that support that. I have not heard of any with drastically improved call quality though
Right? Can't believe this is STILL an issue nowadays and people seem to not even care
@@micksam7 auracast since 5.2
But *its optional*
@@daGwommit’s why I still use (much cheaper) wired EarPods for calls
Not supporting lossless audio at this day and age is WILD
Wake me up when auracast is no longer optional
0:14 "Sounding"???
Already ahead of you
e: my AirPod is stuck
The internet has ruined us.
My brother in Christ
Why do I get that reference… damn internet
why do i know it ....
We are still using Bluetooth 2.0 for Audio and 1.0 for Hands Free (aka audio with microphone).
Bluetooth 5.0 brought LE-Audio and I'm not sure there is a single implementation of it yet.
Devices compatible with Bluetooth LE Audio include the Google Pixel 7/8, Samsung Galaxy S23, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Galaxy Z Flip 4 smartphones. When it comes to headphones the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, OnePlus Buds Pro 2 and Earfun Air Pro 3 true wireless earbuds are also confirmed to support it.
@@G0A7 Are you sure they actually use it? Or is it just the radio that implements the 5.2 spec. Because it would mean massive differences in how they work. LE-Audio is connectionless, has lower bitrate than classic radio and only supports one codec. I have no idea if it even supports bi-directional audio or if it is just broadcasting, like most LE-Radio stuff.
@@marcopfeiffer3032 i know the same as you buddy, your way more interested in this than me so do your research if you want
@@marcopfeiffer3032I am very curious about this as well, as proper documentation is nonexistent and the list of devices that even try to claim anything is extremely slim. What I will say tho is that connecting my buds2 pro/ buds3 pro to a PC or mac sounds noticeably worse than using them with my s23 (which claims to be using LE audio)
@@TheRybka30 That may well be but that is usually the case because some headset manufacturers use different EQ settings for different codecs. Android usually has the broadest bluetooth codec support.
I would expect LE-Audio to sound worse, because the bitrate is much lower and the fixed codec is something specific to LE-Audio. But I haven't actually heard it yet and I'm also not that picky about audio compression. It just has to sound good.
two pairs to one device or i dont care
Yes!
That's possible with 5 too, just a device limitation. Flagship Samsungs already support it for example
@@Tatsuki09ye, I have S23+ and I can connect it to 2 pairs of headphones, but to be fair it's kinda annoying when you borrow a family member's headphones. My mom has S21+ and it constantly connects to my bluetooth headphones too
@@Tatsuki09 my samsung s10 even supports this
Buy a redmi
Can't wait for bluetooth 6 buds
Receive and transmit at full quality to make wireless headphones not sound like a phone call is all I care about… guess I’ll be waiting another 8 years
Sounds like you're still stuck with BT 3.0 lol
My Audeze Maxwell sound great to me (and I've owned muti thousand dollar headphones and amp/dacs) and they're wireless.
@@rainbowsquash673 what did they even do bro why are you so offended?
@@WyattOShea my galaxy buds 2 pro sound great to me too. This person might have some issues with his devices.
@@rainbowsquash673 Depends on your use case really. I prefer to be able to walk around the house and use them but when at the desk wired is for sure better. Basically wireless is for convenience and wired for audio quality but that by no means makes wireless headphones bad (even though most aren't great).
We got tons of nice-to-haves but still no stereo audio while using the microphone on Bluetooth headsets.
Here's to waiting another decade...
That's what LE-Audio should be for.
This is a legacy function that cannot be removed.
@@triadwarfare Obviously it can be fixed. Not for old devices, but like codecs and other bluetooth features, it can simply be turned on if both devices advertise that they support it.
Plenty of bluetooth features have been added in a backwards-compatible way like that.
Honestly, I wouldn't even mind not supporting the legacy dual-mode thing on new devices. It's so bad that it isn't usable anyways.
So when we get lossless over bluetooth?
Maybe if Airia (SCL6 old MQAir) works as expected we could get it
0:34 OMG a floating Riley appears :O
Samsung SmartTag 2 uses UWB as well, so Apple isn't the only one using it.
In fact, Samsung adopted and used UWB long before Apple. It's just the usual NA based reality distortion field in action.
That said, it is probably nice to see this feature being integrated into BT instead of requiring separate radios.
Just as all other devices started implementing 5.3
My only wish is for manufacturers to finally support LE-Audio everywhere!
You have research for that feature to know, if there's even the possibility for it to exist.
Nothing for the audio?? WTH!
The most important improvement needed to be in the minimum audio quality transmission and reception which should have been quite high.
Samsung delivers proper lossless 24-bit audio over Bluetooth 5. It is possible, you just have to be good at it. :)
Only on their own and some AKG headphones, though. But, still.
AKG is a Samsung company, so technically also their own headphones.
Samsung has also been providing their own low-latency audio on BT for years. Allowing gaming audio on their headphones. They've always pushed BT innovation to the limits. The first time they delivered lossless 16-bit audio was about a decade ago. Apple still can't do 16-bit audio on their 600 buck "pro" headphones to this date.
i just want them to fix the audio/mic bandwidth issue
My man's got the realest foot stance here. I feel like I'm on a softball team getting a pep-talk
00:26 that transition is so great I still think the sweater switch was intentional instead of needing to do a fix take after the main shooting
switching from BT 5.0 to 5.4 alrady felt like a HUGE leap, I hope that the leap from 5.4 to 6.0 is actually even bigger than that and not just marketing
Bluetooth 6.9 finally gonna be the version
😐
nice
They're surely saving the good stuff for that exact version
It'll never come out.
No.ice
Are microphones gonna stop sounding like doo-doo?
That's on the mics, not on the BT standard.
@@tim3172HSP/HFP is a Bluetooth profile for bidirectional audio that is used when you're actively recording through a Bluetooth device due to A2DP only supporting undirectional audio. HSP/HFP CVSD is capped at 8KHz, and HFP mSBC is capped at 16KHz. Both sample rates are significantly lower compared to even SBC which is 44KHz so yes, it pretty much is a Bluetooth issue.
Well they don't. Depends on brand and model.
@@tim3172it’s absolutely not.
Nice! That and 5.4's AptX Lossless and AptX Adaptive and other things are making Bluetooth a much better experience.
"track with centimeter precision"
Governments: salivating
Good to see that I fixit isn't actually salty with LTT. The soldering iron looks neat but i'll stick with my hako
Why would they be salty?
I may be out of the loop.
nope just untill this month end
@@nninjastrike2127 Watch the recent wan show at 46:13
@@nninjastrike2127basically they aren’t happy with LTT’s new precision screwdriver.
A lil' bit salty given that they cancelled their partnership :D
I'm not usually into sounding, but this sounds pretty useful.
Still no change to the loss of audio quality when the mic is in use. :(
Good to see IfixIt is still a sponsor! 😊
Sponsor Ends at 2:36
My hero
The clean and jerk? Isnt that around the wrong way?
My current bluetooth headphones transmit sound slower than my monitor image.
I feel like knowing the future when my game queue pops on the screen, and then moments after, the sound reaches my ears.
I like that Bluetooth is one of the more reliable things when it comes to name and function. No Bluetooth 6 4x4 Pro Max Ultra or whatever.
What are the differences between BT 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 without looking it up?
If you have to look it up anyway, what difference does the "name" make?
All I want from a Smart lock is it to tell me if it is currently locked or not. I don't want it to have the ability to remotely unlock. If it can unlock remotely, even if you have to be 2 meters or closer, that still means that eventually a nefarious method will be found/created of unlocking it, by someone who shouldn't. Physical mechanical locks are the only locks I can trust long term. And I use trust to mean that they will work the same way, have the same weaknesses from the day I buy them to the day I replace them. A lock that has a way of remotely unlocking will eventually have an exploit created that renders the remote features as more of a liability than a convenience. A physical lock can be picked, but I buy it knowing that from the beginning, and other that just destroying the lock entirely, or completely bypassing the lock altogether, that will always be the only weakness.
cant believe they added sounding to bluetooth
I just want a good bluetooth headset with audio AND mic quality, wheres the bandwidth increases at T_T
@@NekokunPlays look up auracast, compatibility is still the wild west
Bluetooth 7.0: a new frequency band to prevent interference with 2.4ghz wifi networks and stop microwaves from disrupting your connection.
Seriously! 2.45ghz is a garbage frequency!
The problem is that 2.45 GHz is pretty much the only ISM band that's the same across all countries (meaning Bluetooth devices can be sold as-is everywhere). 900 MHz isn't available in Europe, 5.8 GHz has different cutouts in different countries (only 5150-5350 is safe across all countries, but restricted to indoors use in most countries, and that's going to be used by 5 GHz Wi-Fi a lot of the time), 6 GHz is even worse in that regard, and range goes down as you go up in frequency, so 24 GHz and up would barely let you get 10 meters away from the antenna before you lose signal.
2.45 GHz means Bluetooth devices don't face country-specific restrictions on usage, and you don't need to reconfigure your phone and earbuds based on the country you're in.
so, no audio quality or latency improvements?
@4:44 slight mention of it with little details
Finally I can stream Call of duty zombies on my ipod touch without having my teammates leave due to loss of Bluetooth connection 😢
It only took 12 years
All variant of Bluetooth 5 exhibit major sound delay and wifi disruption when you use wireless subwoofer, wifi hotspot and wifi connection at nearby connectivity.
Until we get Bluetooth with enough bandwidth for lossless audio, I don’t really care.
"PBR"
me : oh! physical based rendering!
"Phase Based Ranging"
me : oh
I wish that the video you plug at the endcard would be linked in the description. The cards don't always appear for me on mobile.
Still got an issue with modern Bluetooth, in the old times you never had an issue with playing music. And now in these 8 years you hear the music stop for 0,5 seconds and then it goes again
Great explanation 🎉
No hi res audio ?
Thanks for the video!
Can you do an updated video on ram? On the latest tech, is there a performance difference between dual and quad channel ram? How much ram is recommended today?
UWB technology that Apple is using is also based on an open standard - IEEE 802.15.4. Samsung and Google are using it as well.
0:40 how is this not already done o_O a TACAN will tell an aircraft how far away it is from it via the same priciple, and its from the 50s.
1:00 again, how is this not a thing already for moving blue tooth devices. I figrued accounting for doppler to be a requirement for percise wireless timing. This principle is how speed guns work.
Probably the last IFix AD that we will be seein at LTT 😩
Can we ever get a Bluetooth version with less than 10ms latency or capable of transmitting 16bit-48kHz/24bit-96kHz audio.
No
Can you do a video on Auracast and Bluetooth LE Audio?
So I am pretty happy with 5.0 with less or no lag anymore. The tracking stuff is not really a game changer, and the screen yanks most of my power from my phone anyhow.
does it fix cancelling out wifi signal? my wifi is unstable when im using wireless headset or eadbuds when mobile gaming
So the new Bluetooth kinda makes our phones into Pokémon itemfinders
Will it have the "no severe lag" feature?
So this ia the first bt version with serious relevant chamge since 4.0? (Other than the one that lets me maybe connect two headsets if phone plays nice.)
How do you make the shop ad on the left go away? Everytime i tried to double tap left to rewind, it accidentally takes me to its store page.
Does it fix the terrible connecting abilities?
Besides someone tuning in. Why. It use radio waves? At least for music.
hoping bt6 will help me in connecting my ear buds just by turning on BT, & not freshly pairing every time i've to use them.
Good man!! PBR .. the greatest beer! And not Professional Bull Riding either .. ;)
Cool but can it run full quality audio and microphone to my PC? Choosing between stereo and mono+handsfree (mic) is ridiculous in 2024! Its a$200 headset - FIGURE IT OUT! Also when at it lets put in some work on Windows Bluetooth
I'm not the only one, that's what pisses me off about bluetooth the most.
Is this a software update, or does it require new hardware?
i want a bluetooth AM radio transmitter
ifixit sponsor is... wild :D
why no explanation about nearlink?
I'm waiting for Bluetooth 20.0
It was difficult to tell when the Ad finished
When fix for terrible sound quality while using mic simultaneously?
BT is still inferior when it comes to sound quality, and bt headphones are still much more expensive than wired counterparts, if speaking about relatively same sound quality.
I guess nothing is really changed in bt except for a bit better this and that, and a bit better latency situation
This actually sounds pretty useful
And still can't send and receive audio simultaneously? (2 headphone speakers in; 1 mic out)
"Bluetooth channel sound" I thought dolby atmos is possible over Bluetooth now
Hello there Riley :D
was wondering earlier today if my 2 bluetooth speaker synced themself to sound at the same time
Oh, Ifixit is back already?😂
The Bluetooth device is ready to peal 😂😂
Will it still interfere with other devices working on 2.4ghz frequency ?
of course
No bandwidth increase?
Two things. 1. You are in Canada so that would be Molson Canadian. 2. Proximity means close. So saying "close proximity" is redundant, as if saying "close close".
‘Close closeness’, more like. ‘Proximal’ would be ‘close’.
ok but like they couldnt add an extra audio channel for microphone. how in 2024 why do i have to use mono audio during a phone call
0.30 A wild Techlinked Riley appeared
It still blows my mind that our phones can time something traveling across the room and back at the speed of light.
0:14 -Channel WHAT??
0:45 But you don't have a beard, Riley! 😂
Harold Bluetooth would be proud because it will make our lives easier
Considering it's needs to be connected for channel sounding to work, it won't help me find my ɓluetooth speaker in my sofa :(
Good thing they didnt call it Bluetooth 5.4 Gen 2x2 V2.2
Samsung's smart tag plus also has UWB, and has been around since before air tags. It also has a built in hole lol.
I know it's likely that nobody cares, but there we are.
These are good updates
Until they add support for STEREO AUDIO + MIC channel to the bluetooth spec...I won't use it. You can either have mono-audio+mic, or stereo audio, but not both at the same time.
It's disgraceful that in 2024
bluetooth still can't transmit audio both ways.
4:00 I feel called out
I prefer to leave my channel unsounded. Will stick with the current version of Bluetooth, thank you very much.
decision based advertising filtering sounds like it would be easy to abuse to make other people's devices ignore channels that it would/should otherwise be listening to