Merely patterns of civilization. Once all the non-birthing couples disappear, only the ones who reproduce will be left. Cities should burn for all I care. The conservative country folk will triumph in the end.
@@sticksandstones3256 Too much secular materialism teaching people meaning is found in status and acquisition of wealth and possessions. Existential malaise. Things will probably bounce back, but it's going to be rough, and probably require it to become even rougher.
Assuming that the 'mob' sees this. The vast majority of commenters (or top commenters at least) on this channel agree with the OP and unless people look up similar videos it won't be promoted to the average youtube user. I get recommended these videos because while I am not subscribed, I have watched similar videos in the past. Somebody who gets all their facts from BBC, Daily Mail ,the Sun or god forbid the guardian isn't going to see this.
Simon is the last of a dying breed. In another ten to fifteen years if Simon (or a younger version) speaks out these truths on an internet channel he or she will be carted off to some kind of UK Gulag.
This synopsis explains a lost about human history and also the enormous gap we are trying to bridge in a diverse society that politicians have stupidly put in place.
Stupidly? I'd say... Very cunningly! It ends the battle between politicians and the people. The people become diluted and conflict between each other. It's brilliant.
@Black Lesbian Poet We see only decline not creation Our glimpses of perfection on earth is perhaps birth .All material is from birth point on in decline. All of the time Maya will tell you different Maya is all powerfull all captivating .Take good care
@lyn strawford if mixing cultures and traditions are bringing out the worst in people, can you please explain to me why the European elite are pushing immigration, integration and the new world order?
It always amuses me when Australian Aborigines remind us that they have the 'oldest living culture' with something like 50,000 years of history. It's said as though it's something to be respected and revered. In my mind, the word 'culture' represents development and growth. You would think James Cook would have been faced with hover cars!
Imagine that!! They collect him in hover cars covered in dot patterns, every driver wearing a hat with corks-on-strings hanging off the rim, and then welcome him to their steel and glass city with ranks of men playing didgeridoos, for a banquet of wriggling witchetty grubs.
I live in Australia, although I’m English, and always will be, Australia is my home and I love it. Unfortunately, the indigenous people here have not seemed to move on. Whilst I can’t condone what happened to their children by us Brits, I’m fairly certain that this country is what it is because of the British. If we hadn’t come…..Australia would still not have a building, a wheel, or anything remotely close to civilisation as we know it. I think Australia is a most beautiful country. The wildlife is stunning, and the people friendly. But, it is what it is because us Europeans made it what it is.
@@pommiebears I have little respect for those that try and use primitive undeveloped and backward looking vision as a political agenda. I have no problem in documenting the reality of historical fact and ensuring none of the 'bad stuff' still exists. Unfortunately the whole issue is perpetuated by activists (many of whom are virtue signalling white people) which just creates more division.
@@pommiebears it is what it is.. we don’t know how Australia might have developed eventually. But much of the unique and different creatures of Australia were lost because of the supposedly superior civilization that invaded. Humanity is still constantly developing and we don’t know who will ultimately survive and really declaring one’s superiority because one wears a digital watch is a little silly. I can’t tell you what is best because the future is always uncertain, but let’s be a bit humbled by that, rather than assuming superiority and then having nature rear it’s head and remind us of how small we really are. One good disaster and we are part of history also.
Simon discusses a new topic almost every day. And every time you get the impression that he's been researching the matter for years. What an amazing range of interest and competence! Such people should work for the BBC.
Absolutely spot on! I am an amateur anthropologist of many years, but have always found/thought, that genetics serve to shape "us" almost equally. You sir have hit the nail on the head! Thank you once again! Cheers!
Is it possible that the African stock also, had no need to develop any further beyond their environment. They were perfectly suited to the areas they inhabited. Those that left were fraught with continual change, climate, food, shelter kicked off an ability for abstract thought, control of fire brings cooking, light, and greater security which enabled more free time to develop deeper abstract thought and ideas. Art, trade and invention etc over an immense amount of time. But, here's the rub. Our use of modern technology and advanced progress has made us exceedingly intelligent and vicious. So my question is, who really has the better deal? We Europeans have the power to crack this planet in two. Or destroy all life. Not so the African.
Oooooo! Great reply! I do agree with the first part you replied; however I'm puzzled with the latter. I think yes, you might be correct. Thinking, yes, if all works well for "you" in life, then why endevor to create and make new things to make life better and easier...? BUT, that IS what human's do, and "They" did not....@@antonyosborne5261
Being that Europe was and still is the most barren continent concerning natural resources and fertility, the inhabitants became very competitive for survival. They fought, ravaged, pillaged, and raided each other. So they became wonderers. Always trying to discover greener pastors from where they came. They took that barbaric type lifestyle into the rest of the world and are the same way to this day. They suffer badly from a psychological state of fear of survival. It manifest itself in there relations with other populations of the world.
‘Although there was mutual incomprehension, babies were produced’ pretty much sums up my first marriage. Excellent video Simon, nicely explained scholasticism liberally laced with dollops of mischief l think.
As a former seedsman I recognise the beneficial effects of hybridisation, mainly hybrid vigour. This is why you see seed packets marked "F1 hybrid" on the racks - and they usually more expensive than the pure cultivars. We are all hybrids of some sort, but human mothers have a habit of rejecting a large proportion of the embryos at an early stage - natural selection is practised most savagely in the womb. Only the best get through. I suspect that the Neanderthals were more intelligent than the Homo Sapiens, and it has been worth picking up the associated diseases and weaknesses they had in order to get some of the intelligence their genes carry. If you want supporting evidence, google maps of neanderthal settlement and compare them to maps of IQ by nation. The correlation is clear, but you may cause a sh*tstorm from the wokies.
That chap in the thumb nail for this download has GOT to be British. He looks as if he's just been told that the 5.45 for Slough has just been cancelled. Again. And the station buffet & lavatories are closed. Again.
Excellent video. I recently ran across several videos by anthropologist, Robert Sepehr who, for many years was one of a very few who believed Europeans did not originate in Africa. (Thus he was highly criticised and ostracised) With the recent improvement of DNA analysis, some of his colleagues are agreeing with him. This will shatter the "we all started in Africa" currently taught and will be much to the dismay of those who have touted it in racial claims, etc.
Last I heard, the OOA (out of Africa) has been accepted as dropped. Only a few cling to it, sometimes out of bias towards racial pride (as explained by those who cling to OOA, not putting words in their mouths).
This is something I've asked in conversation about again and again and again, the first people had a head start on whom came after, but didn't progress, but now its racist to discuss, and it goes on still, people being prosecuted for progress
What do they mean racist only that THEY'VE decided already if you are good are bad .So what should you care about their description of you.Who you are is important. What they think is of no significance to who YOU are You should not let this deter You.Keep the peace with yourself 👍
@Ricardo Leonardo It's definitely critical for intellectual results. Certain populations being isolated and other geographical limitations certainly would affect outcomes. They could impact intellectual potential, but that's not clear.
Intelligence is pattern recognition. Observing what has happened and using that to estimate what will happen is seeing the future. The cold winter is the ultimate pattern recognition test as in order to survive one needs to see the future where they starve or die of cold if they don't take the proper measures to prevent this future. A place like Africa could be overall harsher than Europe, but the conditions are seemingly constant and one doesn't have to see too far in the future to adapt to constant environment.
@@meteorstorm415 The magnitude of the change is relative to the environment. Magnitude is one of the core concepts one needs to grasp to properly evaluate differences. The differences between maximum and minimum temperatures in northern locations are many times higher than near equator.
@@legendmacho Still non the less there are changes to the environment. As a result of dry and rain seasons. If the environment remained constant it would be a complete anomaly.
Excellent video! I have been interested in the stone age since my youth and later excavated stone age tools myself. I found a spot about 100 miles north of the Neanderthal Valley in Germany and found many tools from different time periods. The oldest one is half of a flint tool and was dated to 120.000BC approx. and was probably made by the Heidelbergensis Humans who lived in Germany before the Neanderthals.
she disliked the video following recognising that wearing different shoes on the wrong feet indicated she was in fact a hitherto undiscovered species. Cambridge University my arse.
What evidence is there that what he is saying is true? I hope after this you will leave Africans alone to live on their own without destabilising their institutions so that we can see how they can fare.
"The Asians lacked the drive for exploration and innovation..." The Austronesians built really good sailboats and sailing technology that spread throughout the Pacific and even Africa. They didn't do what the Europeans did but still.
This makes me wonder more about Africa and the possibility of overlooked inventions. One big issue is the relative higher level of diseases in Africa, mainly malaria. Aside from genetics, the environment likely plays a significant role in the rate of progression in cultural complexity that can be achieved.
@@bentray1908 Cold weather is more to do with inventiveness than race has ever been. Realising you and your entire family are going to potentially freeze to death come winter acts as a pretty good motivator to start inventing tools for survival.
@@andrew30m Polynesian culture is a subset of Austronesian culture. The only difference with Polynesians and Austronesians is that Polynesians have some Melanesian admixture contributing to their more heavier builds and curly hair.
Just over a half a century old, this was what we were taught in school. The answer to why early art looks so primitive, was brain evolution that created proper perspective hadn't occurred.
@@axumitedessalegn3549 "Lol" you aren't familiar with quotation marks are you? Perhaps you should go back to grammar school and learn basics first before trying to understand anything as complicated as human evolution.
@@axumitedessalegn3549 Where is your counter information then? Why don't you post anything to support your claim? For me, you saying "of what science has to say. " is a "complete misinterpretation" of what Science is. 'Science' is just a methodology and an examination of data that is produced by such. 'Science' doesn't "say" ANYTHING! You are confusing 'Science' with 'Scientism', which is just an acceptance of a 'hypothesis' based on nothing but an emotional need and faith. That's NOT 'Science'.
@@sunnyjim1355 How about doing a simple Google on the emergence of out of Africa population groups? Do I have to hold your hand? To put it simply the founder effect is the biggest contributer in the genetic deviation of afrcian populations and non africans or groups that emerged after out of Africa migration. Neanderthal inter breeding was very limited and had very small contribution to modern out of Africa population. Neanderthal intelligence even with their bigger brain were not as intelligent as homo sapient that left Africa.
Really interesting topic Simon. I've been wondering about this for ages and put it down to the adventuring spirit of those who decided to leave and explore. I didn't realise there were also deep rooted, fundamental genetic differences too.
Thank you thank you thank you. Your channel is so amazing - and so important. Take this one, for example. We common folk are not supposed to be privy to these kinds of facts. If the powers that be realize we’re thinking about this, there will be hell to pay.
Ok, so they may not have invented the wheel, mathematics or other refinements of civilisation but they came up with some damn fine recipes for stewed missionary.
Oh come on with this nonsense! People like you don't belong in civilised society! Everyone knows missionaries should be roasted and not stewed, it's like you haven't even tried the crispy bits!
As an aside, one of the traits the east asians (Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc) possess, is total conformity and unquestioning obedience to the ruling power structure. It is almost as if a lack of inventiveness goes hand in hand with obedience.
Correct. There's a definite historical pattern that shows the bigger the state the smaller individuality (including initiative, creativity, inventiveness), and vice-versa. I'd also note that inventiveness and intelligence are not synonyms. Inventiveness requires a sort of necessity, stupidity, a stubbornness, lots of hard work. It is more intelligent to simply copy the useful inventions of others and improve them, than to invent everything from scratch.
@@vincentcausey8498 From my observation they definitely go together. Whether creativity and intelligence are the same, or individualism and creativity go together with intelligence that's a different thing though. There are many ways to fail, and only a few to succeed. Hence, the observation that East Asians score higher on average on IQ tests and excel academically while being extremely conformist and not particularly inventive makes perfect sense. This is what I make of what I see of course, I could be wrong.
I guess you've never been to China, Korea or Japan? In each of these countries there is a very long story of inventiveness in art, architecture, clothes, weapons, furniture, irrigation systems etc that were developed before they came in contact with Europe.
I was recently in the UK and stood in awe of a massive cathedral with the most amazing flying buttresses that have been there since the 14th century. Compare that to anything that came out of Africa which could only manage mud huts. Also visiting the Louvre in Paris and seeing the most fantastic paintings and sculptures, hundreds of years old. Compared to African art that is, to say the least, crude and childlike. You're dead right Simon.
Would it be more accurate to say that the ingenious early Middle Easterners are more properly to the north of Arabia, and are (were) Sumerians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Persians?
The Caucasians grew around the Caucasus mountains and then spread to europe and Asia. Sumeria, akkad, babylon , indus, Persia etc were way ahead. Then it stagnated with islam. Europe applied all the knowledge over the last 1000 years.
Gun powder originated in China, along with paper and spaghetti, brought back by the Venetians. Our maths symbols originate from Sanskrit (India). So there has been some sharing going on via the Silk Road
@@mister2628 No it's not "white dudes", "white" people (a term I detest, a German and a Croatian are not the same just because they share skin pigmentation), they are descended from the same tribe that split apart and became both the Europeans and the Persians/Northern Indians. This means they are cousins of "white dudes", not that they *are* "white dudes"
Happy Dominion Day to all my fellow/fellette Canadians! Enjoy your decreasing freedoms, by standing up for yourselves, and others that are unable to do so.
There's javelins from a few hundred thousand years ago probably made by Erectus found in peat preserving the wood which would have disintrigated otherwise and those javelins are perfectly made with the sharp point at the bottom of the tree limb.
I think there is something missing in this. The imperative of need and competition would have to play a part in driving this evolution. If you lived relatively isolated from others and if the land you occupied gave you all the things that you needed to survive, there is not much motivation to change what you have been doing for generations. If you lived in a more hostile environment you may need to devise ways of altering your environment rather than live with it. Survival may have required inventing ways of taking resources away from others. Perhaps the lack or abundance of what a people required to survive account for the need to change or remain the same.
Darwin evolution doesn't produce new species, but hybridisation does. Sub-Saharan Africans are from a Cro-Magnon and Homo Erectus hybridisation. The human races are really different human species.
@@simonruszczak5563 How can you possibly be so wrong. There is only one human race called Homo Sapiens which originated in Africa about 300 thousand years ago. World exploration out of Africa was a barrier or filter. Only the more intelligent humans ventured North into what is now Europe. This is a very complex process that explains the disparity in average IQ between sub-Saharan Africans and present Caucasians and Asians. If there were different human species, mating and reproduction would be impossible.
@@ronfroehlich4697 Mules are sterile. African/European mixed humans are not. Ligers and Tigrons are also not sterile (at least the first generation is not, I believe), but they come with many genetic issues due to the genes not matching up. Once again, not true in humans.
Australia was pradise for many Aborigional tribes for thousends of years, plenty of game and bushtucker, they walked...there was no need for the wheel..
I think the lack of 'drive' probably comes from those humans coming from hot regions where conserving energy, rather than expending it to keep warm, is the natural state.
@@viysnjor4811 lol we're talking about the development of the human condition a very long time prior to your examples. Neolithic humans didn't build the pyamids (or anything in fact), before you get too offended.
@@timmo491 It doesn't matter when we're talking about, the Egypt and Babylon were still located in extremely hot climates, and they existed before advanced civilizations in temperate and cold climates. If your hypothesis was correct, it would show up in both cases, not just the conveniently far distance past beyond which very little to no evidence can actually be recovered
Fascinating. But just one thing;- Could not the Lion Man be a representation of someone - a shaman or chieftain wearing a lion's head (or a representation of a lion's head) for some ritualistic purpose?
Of course it could. You would then need to question why a Shaman might do such a thing. We could conjecture that the intent was to capture some aspect of the lion to enhance the human. The question is; Why do these artefacts arise in Europe and not Africa? This supposes that Simon is right and that there aren't examples from Africa. Personally, I'm not convinced that Simon's views of Africa are entirely correct.
@@trevorhoward2254 I'm not aware of artefacts like this in Africa, but the San rock art has many similar theriomorphic examples, where half-human, half-animal figures are depicted. A lot of San art reminds me of Lascaux, Trois-Freres, Altamira, etc in Europe. David Lewis-Williams has written extensively about the palaeolithic European cave art, comparing it with the San art. Because some San people who still practised shamanism were around, Lewis-Williams obviously asked them what their art depicted. The shamans described going into what we would call trance states, where they adopted a spirit animal form. It is a really fascinating subject!
European growth in creative intelligence would have been a product of survival, a necessity to continue genetic lineages rather than a result of conscious choice. Peoples and inhabitants of other places never faced the same risks, thus making creativity redundant.
Absolutely correct and logical. Anyone who disagrees is either jealous or ideologically indoctrinated with fabricated revisionist history that re-imagines their ancestry. We must bring history and critical *thinking* skills back to schools.
The Human Genome Project that was completed in the 1990s, where they mapped the entirety of the human DNA, it was revealed that the sub-Saharan Africans DNA contains 19% DNA of "unknown origin". Researchers could not find any ancient, human species that it could have come from. In addition, the project also determined that 100% of sub-Saharan Africans are RH+. 2 RH+ parents cannot conceive and give birth to RH- children. Which means that the "Out of Africa" migration theory never happened. Because if the human race had migrated out of Africa then the whole rest of the human race would also be RH+, as well as possessing this 19% DNA of unknown origin. These genetic determinations were never published outside of the initial report findings. They were never publicly spoken of.
I wonder how long this one will be up. I wish you had been my history teacher at school although it was 35 years ago. Mind you what you teach and what you can teach are two different things.
In addition to DNA, it is perhaps useful to consider farming vs hunting-gathering; and climate, geography and geology, among other ideas. With regard to farming and climate, if you didn't plant in the spring in the Levant and NW Europe, you died next winter. Wth regard to geography, there are more coves and bays in the UK (I read somewhere) than there is in all of Africa. This is due to glaciers carving out the landscape during their advance; and glacial melt-water eroding it during their retreat. Bays and coves made it possible for people to go to sea to fish, explore and trade, and have a protected place to come home to. With regard to geology, there could be found tin, copper, iron ore, coal and salt among other things. Over several millenia, perhaps those who exploited these natural boons became more dominant compared to those who did not. So perhaps DNA is an important part of the puzzle - maybe even the most important - but these other factors had an effect as well.
Interesting hypotheses on specifics. It is obvious though that environment plays a role. It seems to me IQ and environment may well be in a kind of synergistic loop. Edit: I should add other physical characteristics as well which then feed into it.
Interesting and useful. But. You only have to look at the comments on this channel to know its dominated by racists. Pure and simple. What's being promoted here is good old pseudo science. You are wasting your time. But so am I. Not sure what Mr Webbs motivation is....but I have a few suspicions which I will not Describe. Being an anti zionist like me means its very easy to get accused of antisemitism.
DNA and its unique combinations are certainly drivers. The cunning bit is its ability to push its host,a human if you like, into the most useful situations; the nurture bit and brain development with the environmental pressures thus associated allows humans to take up advantages.. End result is that the individual is more likely to pass on that particular sequencing of DNA. Our species thrives and dominates others. Leaders and genii emerge in small numbers. Many will never fulfill their potential but some will. H. sapiens did it better than other humanoid species under the environmental conditions of the day. Europe suited us best?
I once read that global wealth was largely determined by the existence of cold winters and deep-water ports. This is because freezing cold winters are highly effective at killing off vectors of disease and the transport of goods via water is the most cost-effective.
Excellent! Just want to add Lascaux painting -20000 years in France (Dordogne). I just visited the caves were the painting are, and it's even more impressive then the pictures because there are perspective effects that were introduced in the making of the painting on purpose. Incredible.
When it comes to storytelling as well these things are also true. Not in a religious sense, but in tales of the common man. Original thought, innovation, creativity, it’s in our stories as well.
Are we honestly saying that the Japanese have never invented anything? Ivermectin for one, also methamphetamine, not to mention lithium-ion batteries. And the Chinese have invented a shit load of things, not just paper and gunpowder: the compass, printing, cannons, gas lighting, the list goes on. Not recently, but that's down to a repressive totalitarian regime rather than anything to do with race. Sorry, but this hypothesis is complete bunk. If it was just down to race, then all caucasians in all places at all times would have been inventing shit constantly. That's clearly not the case, it was only when the right ideas were in the culture, such as freedom of thought and speech, that started being creative and inventive.
Mankind did NOT begin in Africa! Out of Africa has been debunked in mainstream academia. www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
🤦♀️ According to German philologists Otto Schrader and Alfons A. Nehring, the Ancient Greek word Καύκασος (Kaukasos) is connected to Gothic Hauhs ("high") as well as Lithuanian Kaũkas ("hillock") and Kaukarà ("hill, top").[15][17] British linguist Adrian Room points out that Kau- also means "mountain" in Pelasgian.[18]
"A critical datapoint has emerged that disproves Out of Africa, not one non-African participant tested positive to any of 13 African sub-clades of haplogroup A" Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy www.scirp.org/html/19566.html
@@johnpalmer5357 Your mistake is assuming the people left in Africa never changed at all. They would've had just as much genetic divergence as every other group of people, there were many different homo sapiens groups in Africa that had all this time to mix and change the genetics from what they would've been hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Personally I believe we are not as whites descended from blacks as we have even now too many differences between us, our skulls are completely different shapes, eye colour, temperament and academic development.
Highly recommend a book by Bill Cooper called 'After the Flood: The Early Post-flood History of Europe'. It's far more explanatory in the origins of the European people than most other materials/sources I have read.
@@Zanuka To avoid coming off as being verbose: www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/433064.After_The_Flood If you don't want to buy it for somewhere in the region of £8-£10 then there's probably a PDF online of it somewhere also.
Actually, perhaps they are purists for even this content creator subscribes to Bolshevik “subverted history” as he believes “Whites” originate in/from Africa. He is flatly wrong.
Neanderthal and Denisovan brains and skulls were larger and differently shaped compared to modern humans. Even though they had larger brains, growth was concentrated differently. In Neanderthal and Denisovan the rear and occipital lobe are larger. While in modern humans the front sections, cerebellum are larger. Which alters the shape and probably responsible for differences in skull shape as well. Also the human chin is far more pronounced compared to these ancient hominids. There were also back migrations into Africa. As there have been low levels, under 1% of Neanderthal dna found in subsaharan populations. It’s very possible that higher % of archaic genes is partially responsible for population differences. But this isn’t speciation, just genetic diversity. Abstract thinking absolutely be a part of that. It’s fairly certain that Neanderthals were super athletes, stronger, denser and more explosive than most modern humans. Which could suggest Neanderthal and Denisovan were more reliant on physical capability and less likely to have the need to develop cognitive abilities.
The Chinese invented gun powder. The first cannon used in warfare, herbs for medicinal purposes, modern building techniques as in the Great Wall of China. The Chinese were also great philosophers and also were very good war strategists and were among the first to use horses in battle. They didn't invent many machines but they were very intelligent and resourceful compared to most other races/civilizations.
The Great Wall was built with rammed earth until the middle ages. No modern techniques. Chinese architecture changed little over 2000 years. The pagoda is copy of the stupa introduced to China by Islam. Chinese philosophy is a pale shadow of Greek philosophy. Concerned mainly with ethics and governing. The Chinese were not first to use the horse in battle. Horses in battle were first developed by tribes around the black sea.
The Chinese did have differential gearing on a little 2-wheeled truck they had which when man-hauled & trundled around had a mandarin like figure on top which always pointed to the North. I remember reading about it years ago. Incidentally I was told that the reason Chicago gangsters 1920's mass-produced cars used to screech so much going around corners was because they were not supplied with differential gearing on the back axle. Is this true?
Gotta differ with you on the Chinese inventions bit. They also invented moveable type, which is nontrivial. My private hypothesis about the relative cultural stagnation of their empire, when it wasn't shattered by war or invasion, was that they felt they'd arrived at a system that worked and were wise enough to see that further progress had attendant pitfalls they were willing to avoid. For that reason, there was very little they were willing to import from European traders until forced by the need to defend themselves from modern external threats. That and opium, which will get in the bones of any culture once introduced. Before I get called out for being some sort of pro-Chinese shill, I'm not at all. I very much dislike the CCP in particular. But it's important to see your opponents as clearly as possible if you want to defend yourself from them. The imitation the Chinese are doing at the moment is likely due to the way communism stamps out unique thought. They're also saving a lot of resources by doing it. The Romans did the same and reverse-engineered Carthaginian warships. The US did it with all sorts of tools and texts. It's a smart move when you're up and coming.
China had gunpowder for how many thousands of years, and it took european alchemists to figure out that mixing honey and spices in to the mixture was not a good idea. The chinese had the numbers and supplies to fight off mongels, huns, any foe, really, yet never had the courage or willpower to do so. A story of a malaysian pirate tribe stalking the coast line of china, when asked by the governor what to do, the emperor simply said move inland a mile. Why would an emperor tell his vassals to surrender an entire mile of land, when they have more than enough men to fight any foe, nearly two thirds of the world lived in china at the time, so it makes little sense, yet is a good image of chinese character. Another, is the invention of the first repeating weapon, a crossbow, by the chinese. The weapon used a lever system to redraw the crossbow, albeit to a pathetic draw, such that even a weak gambeson would be more than enough to stop it from harming the person being shot. Yet the weapon was never even intended for killing by force, such as a windlass crossbow of europe. It was instead, designed as a way of intoxicating their foe with poison, in the hopes that they would die later. What group, would think that even if I can hardly hurt my foe, and may well die for my efforts, yet instead of killing them, I should just attempt to poison them, so that even when my inherently unvalued life soon end, my commander can derive some value you from me in death. What sick culture would press humans in to such demeaning service?
Their technological renaissance also ended around the time the Mongols destroyed the Song dynasty, and started a long tradition of China being ruled by hostile foreigners.
The Chinese never had vellum or parchment which was superior to paper and preferred, even after the Europeans had paper and papyrus before that. The only option for writing in China before paper were bamboo sticks, wood or silk cloth. The Chinese never invented the book, and never adopted it for centuries after it had been introduced to them. The Chinese never developed a widespread printing of written texts.
@@glennmccrae7821 Chinese crossbows would have been ineffective against European armor. Even bronze age armor. The Chinese developed most of their philosophies during the 'warring states period'. Chinese philosophy is very modest in scope and depth compared to Greek philosophy. Chinese philosophy is mainly concerned with ethics and governing. When Chinese philosophy concerns itself with nature or the world, it is little more than statements of belief. There are no Chinese philosophers in the past 2500 years on the intellectual level of hundreds produced in the West.
This is the first time I have seen this channel relate myth as truth. While the story you tell is based on possible pasts, we have no records from this period. Had you pointed out that this was a story based on limited evidence as the wonderfully The Mammoth Hunters is an historical fiction novel by Jean M. Auel released in 1985 - its wonderfully worshipped and possible past - but it is a story - and more researched than your version. For example her hybrids are the product of rape. The fact is that humans in paradise do not have to advance - Africans had food off trees, no need for shelter an d clothing except for comfort and only other predators forcing them to evolve at all. Everywhere else on the planet is a war zone for survival - a push for improvement.
you are completely wrong. try some more education, We DO HAVE records.. these records tell us of giant migrations... it is the GENETIC RECORD ! The record in our DNA.
@@edwardharley9 While there are facts used this story such as "The percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans is zero or close to zero in people from African populations, and is about 1 to 2 percent in people of European or Asian background." the rest is myth building. Jean M. Auel assumed the same fact s (at the time she did her work it was speculatiion, she happened to be right) and makes the same inductive fiction done in this video essay. For example: WE do know how the breeding took place - its a guess it was rape or other. We do not know what effect it had on migration, there is no records of that. Basic science - correlation is not causation. Auel argues that racial memory RNA was added into the mix. It could be true but is speculation. Contrast this to Diamond explaination for the same European expansion, which is well documented and has not DNA compentent - admitidly one could alter his arugment a little why saying Germ resistance was improved in the hyrids and it played a factor, but the factor appears close to insignificant - thought its possible it was a least a minor player in this thesis. See: Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (previously titled Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years The fact is that the research has not been done for this particuarl tale, so it is just a talke, not much different than specualing that human kind was seeded from other plants - except there far more research in that thesis and so far far more evidence for it as well. This aricle covers that theory and 6 others. www.livescience.com/13363-7-theories-origin-life.html Again my main concern is that a speculative hypothesis is told as fact, as opposed to one theory based on these facts is. Or saying "here is the unproven and disputed theory as it currently understood" No such cavet was made.
That must be why thousands of Africans starve to death every year. Even in the late '60s when cannibalism was pretty common place. The Communists destroyed China's gene pool by killing off dissenters (Thinkers). It set them back a hundred years compared to European industrialized nations. And then there is war. Instead of sending out the 4-F people to be slaughtered, they send the fittest and brightest. War destroys and breaks up large areas of specific gene pools. Cities with a lot of machinists are that way because people used to marry in their own class and many of the children retained the skill genes. I have watched "Scientists" try to make chimpanzees human since the '50s. What they got was an animal to mimic humans. They have little ability to learn on their own. If dogs had hands, I suspect they would soon pass chimps in ability. Dogs also practice hybridization and it shows.
History Debunked, your comment, "not able to do much of very great interest" are you sure that you aren't referring to the current generation of millennials? "Remained at the same level or possibly regressed?" History is a circle and you prove it. Love your work man, you are a breath of fresh air in a stagnant world intellectually speaking.
Having lived in China for over a decade I have a running curiosity about a culture that cannot invent but can definitely counterfeit and copy. I have wondered if it's genetic, is it socialized, its both, neither, I can't explain it or even describe it and yet -there it is. Rather, there is isn't. They don't seem to have a big space in the brain for truly novel invention. I don't just mean inventing a 'Gizmo' either but I mean when put in any situation or problem where they might 'invent a new response or new way' they seem sort of stumped and won't even think to try it. It's a strange thing, probably tied up in 'filial piety' and communism and 'saving face' and so on.
The declining birth rates among indigenous Europeans is a worrying trend.
Hungary has it right on that one.
Agreed, its almost as alarming as AIDS rates in Africa .
What is causing low birth rates?
Merely patterns of civilization. Once all the non-birthing couples disappear, only the ones who reproduce will be left. Cities should burn for all I care. The conservative country folk will triumph in the end.
@@sticksandstones3256 Too much secular materialism teaching people meaning is found in status and acquisition of wealth and possessions. Existential malaise. Things will probably bounce back, but it's going to be rough, and probably require it to become even rougher.
@@sticksandstones3256 social shift against having children and increasing male virginity
Batten down the hatches, I fear the mob will be baying for blood after dropping this bombshell.
Keep up the good work mate.
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
@@vklnew9824 interesting.
Assuming that the 'mob' sees this. The vast majority of commenters (or top commenters at least) on this channel agree with the OP and unless people look up similar videos it won't be promoted to the average youtube user. I get recommended these videos because while I am not subscribed, I have watched similar videos in the past. Somebody who gets all their facts from BBC, Daily Mail ,the Sun or god forbid the guardian isn't going to see this.
@@bludgerabled True, but S**** has his enemies, he has his videos reported daily, so I'm sure this video has already been flagged.
@@Bitcoin-For-The-Win Oh for sure, people love to silence people they don't agree with.
Simon is the last of a dying breed. In another ten to fifteen years if Simon (or a younger version) speaks out these truths on an internet channel he or she will be carted off to some kind of UK Gulag.
I think your timeframe is off. More like 15 months. :/
Walesktf 1969.
Dying breed - Yep the Neanderthals !
@@primusinterpares99 we all gonna die or be enlaved it sux :(
The level of nonsense is laughable.
@@flowrepins6663 Well why don't "we" do something?
This synopsis explains a lost about human history and also the enormous gap we are trying to bridge in a diverse society that politicians have stupidly put in place.
Stupidly? I'd say... Very cunningly! It ends the battle between politicians and the people. The people become diluted and conflict between each other. It's brilliant.
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
@Black Lesbian Poet We see only decline not creation Our glimpses of perfection on earth is perhaps birth .All material is from birth point on in decline. All of the time Maya will tell you different Maya is all powerfull all captivating .Take good care
@lyn strawford Did you even watch the video? The guy goes off on a rant and rave about how mixing got us humans to the point we are now.
@lyn strawford if mixing cultures and traditions are bringing out the worst in people, can you please explain to me why the European elite are pushing immigration, integration and the new world order?
It always amuses me when Australian Aborigines remind us that they have the 'oldest living culture' with something like 50,000 years of history. It's said as though it's something to be respected and revered. In my mind, the word 'culture' represents development and growth. You would think James Cook would have been faced with hover cars!
Imagine that!! They collect him in hover cars covered in dot patterns, every driver wearing a hat with corks-on-strings hanging off the rim, and then welcome him to their steel and glass city with ranks of men playing didgeridoos, for a banquet of wriggling witchetty grubs.
@@quentinnewark2745 wakanda?
I live in Australia, although I’m English, and always will be, Australia is my home and I love it. Unfortunately, the indigenous people here have not seemed to move on. Whilst I can’t condone what happened to their children by us Brits, I’m fairly certain that this country is what it is because of the British. If we hadn’t come…..Australia would still not have a building, a wheel, or anything remotely close to civilisation as we know it. I think Australia is a most beautiful country. The wildlife is stunning, and the people friendly. But, it is what it is because us Europeans made it what it is.
@@pommiebears I have little respect for those that try and use primitive undeveloped and backward looking vision as a political agenda.
I have no problem in documenting the reality of historical fact and ensuring none of the 'bad stuff' still exists.
Unfortunately the whole issue is perpetuated by activists (many of whom are virtue signalling white people) which just creates more division.
@@pommiebears it is what it is.. we don’t know how Australia might have developed eventually. But much of the unique and different creatures of Australia were lost because of the supposedly superior civilization that invaded. Humanity is still constantly developing and we don’t know who will ultimately survive and really declaring one’s superiority because one wears a digital watch is a little silly. I can’t tell you what is best because the future is always uncertain, but let’s be a bit humbled by that, rather than assuming superiority and then having nature rear it’s head and remind us of how small we really are. One good disaster and we are part of history also.
Northern Europe is for the indigenous population of Northern Europe.
We wish, we are lost I'm afraid.
@@frankdooley6451 not so much lost, as betrayed.
@@LeeGee Great man, don't you think?
That’s the Neanderthals , sadly gone but you might get a few still hanging about on here.
If they can hold it.
The fact that we kept the Neanderthal DNA is proof that it had benefits to us
Well said.
Not true unfortunately.
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
@@WreckItRolfe It is absolutely how it works. One mutation can spread to the entire population if it is beneficial.
@@WreckItRolfe denying natural selection and evolution? Interesting strategy
Simon discusses a new topic almost every day. And every time you get the impression that he's been researching the matter for years. What an amazing range of interest and competence! Such people should work for the BBC.
I commented the same yesterday, he should have his own BBC program. Maybe we should start a petition
@stig
BBC would not like this.
Their nature god has mad obvious deliberate lies and they continue to promote him as authoritative.
Indeed. But the beeb doesn't like the truth...it doesn't fit their Globalist/Cultural Marxist agenda.
This is the place to come when you want to hear an opinion
@@robertmacleod6729 A good opinion.
Absolutely spot on! I am an amateur anthropologist of many years, but have always found/thought, that genetics serve to shape "us" almost equally. You sir have hit the nail on the head! Thank you once again! Cheers!
Is it possible that the African stock also, had no need to develop any further beyond their environment. They were perfectly suited to the areas they inhabited. Those that left were fraught with continual change, climate, food, shelter kicked off an ability for abstract thought, control of fire brings cooking, light, and greater security which enabled more free time to develop deeper abstract thought and ideas. Art, trade and invention etc over an immense amount of time. But, here's the rub. Our use of modern technology and advanced progress has made us exceedingly intelligent and vicious. So my question is, who really has the better deal? We Europeans have the power to crack this planet in two. Or destroy all life. Not so the African.
Oooooo! Great reply! I do agree with the first part you replied; however I'm puzzled with the latter. I think yes, you might be correct. Thinking, yes, if all works well for "you" in life, then why endevor to create and make new things to make life better and easier...? BUT, that IS what human's do, and "They" did not....@@antonyosborne5261
Being that Europe was and still is the most barren continent concerning natural resources and fertility, the inhabitants became very competitive for survival. They fought, ravaged, pillaged, and raided each other. So they became wonderers. Always trying to discover greener pastors from where they came. They took that barbaric type lifestyle into the rest of the world and are the same way to this day. They suffer badly from a psychological state of fear of survival. It manifest itself in there relations with other populations of the world.
The problem of inbreeding is the biggest threat to the British health service.
You mean inbreeding within a certain ethnic group.
Respect mate from Dublin, Ireland keeping facts..facts and not the BS that seems to be everywhere at the moment 👏🏼
Same here mate
Hes talking out his arse about Israel being the centre of the modern humans,more like Anatolia.
From Ireland too mate. Derry. Totally agree! 👍🏻
Dub here
Dublin in the house lads yup.👍😂
‘Although there was mutual incomprehension, babies were produced’ pretty much sums up my first marriage.
Excellent video Simon, nicely explained scholasticism liberally laced with dollops of mischief l think.
😂
As a former seedsman I recognise the beneficial effects of hybridisation, mainly hybrid vigour. This is why you see seed packets marked "F1 hybrid" on the racks - and they usually more expensive than the pure cultivars. We are all hybrids of some sort, but human mothers have a habit of rejecting a large proportion of the embryos at an early stage - natural selection is practised most savagely in the womb. Only the best get through.
I suspect that the Neanderthals were more intelligent than the Homo Sapiens, and it has been worth picking up the associated diseases and weaknesses they had in order to get some of the intelligence their genes carry.
If you want supporting evidence, google maps of neanderthal settlement and compare them to maps of IQ by nation. The correlation is clear, but you may cause a sh*tstorm from the wokies.
@rationalism Monstrosities in what regard?
This….
This
Keep up the good work brother! Won't be long before this kind of conversation will land us in JAIL. Get the word out while we still can!
That chap in the thumb nail for this download has GOT to be British. He looks as if he's just been told that the 5.45 for Slough has just been cancelled. Again. And the station buffet & lavatories are closed. Again.
Thank you Simon. That was fascinating. Love your work.
You are a gentleman and a scholar, sir. Thank you for taking the time to do what you do.
😂 scholar?
Excellent video. I recently ran across several videos by anthropologist, Robert Sepehr who, for many years was one of a very few who believed Europeans did not originate in Africa. (Thus he was highly criticised and ostracised) With the recent improvement of DNA analysis, some of his colleagues are agreeing with him. This will shatter the "we all started in Africa" currently taught and will be much to the dismay of those who have touted it in racial claims, etc.
Last I heard, the OOA (out of Africa) has been accepted as dropped. Only a few cling to it, sometimes out of bias towards racial pride (as explained by those who cling to OOA, not putting words in their mouths).
This is something I've asked in conversation about again and again and again, the first people had a head start on whom came after, but didn't progress, but now its racist to discuss, and it goes on still, people being prosecuted for progress
You can't discount environment. He completely omits it.
What do they mean racist only that THEY'VE decided already if you are good are bad .So what should you care about their description of you.Who you are is important. What they think is of no significance to who YOU are You should not let this deter You.Keep the peace with yourself 👍
@Ricardo Leonardo It's definitely critical for intellectual results. Certain populations being isolated and other geographical limitations certainly would affect outcomes. They could impact intellectual potential, but that's not clear.
I listen to someone talking sence all day , very refreshing.
🤔
Intelligence is pattern recognition. Observing what has happened and using that to estimate what will happen is seeing the future. The cold winter is the ultimate pattern recognition test as in order to survive one needs to see the future where they starve or die of cold if they don't take the proper measures to prevent this future.
A place like Africa could be overall harsher than Europe, but the conditions are seemingly constant and one doesn't have to see too far in the future to adapt to constant environment.
Yes, and preparing for winter involves delayed gratification.
Necessity is the mother of invention and the necessities were different in these places, hence the difference in inventiveness, or lack thereof.
That isn’t how environments work, conditions always change.
@@meteorstorm415 The magnitude of the change is relative to the environment. Magnitude is one of the core concepts one needs to grasp to properly evaluate differences. The differences between maximum and minimum temperatures in northern locations are many times higher than near equator.
@@legendmacho
Still non the less there are changes to the environment. As a result of dry and rain seasons. If the environment remained constant it would be a complete anomaly.
Excellent video! I have been interested in the stone age since my youth and later excavated stone age tools myself. I found a spot about 100 miles north of the Neanderthal Valley in Germany and found many tools from different time periods. The oldest one is half of a flint tool and was dated to 120.000BC approx. and was probably made by the Heidelbergensis Humans who lived in Germany before the Neanderthals.
That's amazing, thanks for sharing.
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
to hell with you and your lucky finds and amazing story
@@Blobby192 you are an NPC
That’s interesting as hell,do you have any info on these people?
I wish Diane Abbot would watch this she defo needs a history lesson
If she had Neanderthal DNA she would know how to put her shoes on the right feet.
she disliked the video following recognising that wearing different shoes on the wrong feet indicated she was in fact a hitherto undiscovered species. Cambridge University my arse.
What evidence is there that what he is saying is true? I hope after this you will leave Africans alone to live on their own without destabilising their institutions so that we can see how they can fare.
Absolutely fascinating talk. So refreshing to hear such open mindedness. Well done Sir!
Just discovered this channel tonight. Loving it. Can't believe our RUclips Overlords haven't squashed it yet.
Mixed Nowadays is a step backwards.
Your peer reviewed evidence for this, is where?
@@Yawbus1976 The same place as your contradictory evidence..
You’ll notice the gay scene is the only area with zero diversity
Boudicca Q
Correct. For others it is a genetic leap forward.
@@meteorstorm415 Heterosis is probably the answer.
Now you're getting into my main area of study! Thank you
"The Asians lacked the drive for exploration and innovation..."
The Austronesians built really good sailboats and sailing technology that spread throughout the Pacific and even Africa. They didn't do what the Europeans did but still.
Exactly, the greatest conqueror was Genghis Khan too
This makes me wonder more about Africa and the possibility of overlooked inventions. One big issue is the relative higher level of diseases in Africa, mainly malaria. Aside from genetics, the environment likely plays a significant role in the rate of progression in cultural complexity that can be achieved.
Polynesians 🤷🏻♂️
@@bentray1908 Cold weather is more to do with inventiveness than race has ever been. Realising you and your entire family are going to potentially freeze to death come winter acts as a pretty good motivator to start inventing tools for survival.
@@andrew30m Polynesian culture is a subset of Austronesian culture. The only difference with Polynesians and Austronesians is that Polynesians have some Melanesian admixture contributing to their more heavier builds and curly hair.
What I have thought for many decades.
Comforting that a very knowledgeable
person validates what I observe.
Thank you.
Just over a half a century old, this was what we were taught in school. The answer to why early art looks so primitive, was brain evolution that created proper perspective hadn't occurred.
BRITISH HUMOR is sarcasm with a straight face
One of the best sources on YT for this is Survive the Jive. He looks into all the recent DNA information and the R1a project which tracks ancient DNA.
yes a brill guy
I agree very good Chanel I'm fascinated by this period of history he knows his stuff but Simon is going up all the time in my opinion
ruclips.net/video/Tck170_9HTM/видео.html
He's a Alt/Right posh boy knobhead that knows jack shit about prehistory. And he's got a beard.
Paul P thanks for the link, it's very interesting.
I wish more people understood and ‘accepted’ these ‘facts’, it could make our lives more bearable.
Lol this is not a fact. This is a complete misinterpretation of what science has to say.
@@axumitedessalegn3549 "Lol" you aren't familiar with quotation marks are you? Perhaps you should go back to grammar school and learn basics first before trying to understand anything as complicated as human evolution.
@@American-Plague my statement stands. Idiot.
@@axumitedessalegn3549 Where is your counter information then? Why don't you post anything to support your claim?
For me, you saying "of what science has to say.
" is a "complete misinterpretation" of what Science is. 'Science' is just a methodology and an examination of data that is produced by such. 'Science' doesn't "say" ANYTHING!
You are confusing 'Science' with 'Scientism', which is just an acceptance of a 'hypothesis' based on nothing but an emotional need and faith.
That's NOT 'Science'.
@@sunnyjim1355 How about doing a simple Google on the emergence of out of Africa population groups? Do I have to hold your hand? To put it simply the founder effect is the biggest contributer in the genetic deviation of afrcian populations and non africans or groups that emerged after out of Africa migration. Neanderthal inter breeding was very limited and had very small contribution to modern out of Africa population. Neanderthal intelligence even with their bigger brain were not as intelligent as homo sapient that left Africa.
Simon is a very astute and honest man. So glad I found his site.
Really interesting topic Simon. I've been wondering about this for ages and put it down to the adventuring spirit of those who decided to leave and explore. I didn't realise there were also deep rooted, fundamental genetic differences too.
Thank you thank you thank you. Your channel is so amazing - and so important. Take this one, for example. We common folk are not supposed to be privy to these kinds of facts. If the powers that be realize we’re thinking about this, there will be hell to pay.
Ok, so they may not have invented the wheel, mathematics or other refinements of civilisation but they came up with some damn fine recipes for stewed missionary.
@passius1 false. Northern Europeans had their own form of civilisation.
Oh come on with this nonsense! People like you don't belong in civilised society! Everyone knows missionaries should be roasted and not stewed, it's like you haven't even tried the crispy bits!
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
@@Yawbus1976 the crispy bits are the best😁
@@meteorstorm415 Maths can’t be invented 🤦♀️
As an aside, one of the traits the east asians (Chinese, Koreans, Japanese etc) possess, is total conformity and unquestioning obedience to the ruling power structure. It is almost as if a lack of inventiveness goes hand in hand with obedience.
Correct. There's a definite historical pattern that shows the bigger the state the smaller individuality (including initiative, creativity, inventiveness), and vice-versa.
I'd also note that inventiveness and intelligence are not synonyms. Inventiveness requires a sort of necessity, stupidity, a stubbornness, lots of hard work. It is more intelligent to simply copy the useful inventions of others and improve them, than to invent everything from scratch.
@@ministryoftruth8499 Good points. I was thinking that maybe individualism and creativity go together.
@@vincentcausey8498 From my observation they definitely go together. Whether creativity and intelligence are the same, or individualism and creativity go together with intelligence that's a different thing though. There are many ways to fail, and only a few to succeed. Hence, the observation that East Asians score higher on average on IQ tests and excel academically while being extremely conformist and not particularly inventive makes perfect sense. This is what I make of what I see of course, I could be wrong.
Good, interesting, thread
I guess you've never been to China, Korea or Japan? In each of these countries there is a very long story of inventiveness in art, architecture, clothes, weapons, furniture, irrigation systems etc that were developed before they came in contact with Europe.
I recommend Atantean Gardens Robert sepher his second channel. A great channel that explores this topic.
Robert Sepehr ftw my good man. Good choosings.
He's still producing content now on the channel robert sepehr
@@smoath correct he just realeased a 1 hour 20 min upload. Ill edit and asd his secibd channel in
I was recently in the UK and stood in awe of a massive cathedral with the most amazing flying buttresses that have been there since the 14th century. Compare that to anything that came out of Africa which could only manage mud huts. Also visiting the Louvre in Paris and seeing the most fantastic paintings and sculptures, hundreds of years old. Compared to African art that is, to say the least, crude and childlike. You're dead right Simon.
Would it be more accurate to say that the ingenious early Middle Easterners are more properly to the north of Arabia, and are (were) Sumerians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Persians?
I think Arabs have good intellect. The problem is that it is paralyzed by their religion.
@@ministryoftruth8499 the religion of peace protects its followers from wokism.
@@yminyru That's a fact. It's not all bad.
@@ministryoftruth8499
They are severely inbred though.
The Caucasians grew around the Caucasus mountains and then spread to europe and Asia.
Sumeria, akkad, babylon , indus, Persia etc were way ahead. Then it stagnated with islam. Europe applied all the knowledge over the last 1000 years.
Gun powder originated in China, along with paper and spaghetti, brought back by the Venetians. Our maths symbols originate from Sanskrit (India). So there has been some sharing going on via the Silk Road
Sanskrit is modernised Old Indo-Aryan, there was no "India", read the Vedas, it's white dudes.
@@mister2628 No it's not "white dudes", "white" people (a term I detest, a German and a Croatian are not the same just because they share skin pigmentation), they are descended from the same tribe that split apart and became both the Europeans and the Persians/Northern Indians. This means they are cousins of "white dudes", not that they *are* "white dudes"
Simon this is probably the best video you’ve done! Very well researched & presented! But most importantly THOUGHT PROVOKING! Well done!
Happy Dominion Day to all my fellow/fellette Canadians!
Enjoy your decreasing freedoms, by standing up for yourselves, and others that are unable to do so.
I would love to see this informative history lesson shown on mainstream tv, with a trigger warning.
The words Trigger warnings now banned as they can 'Trigger' trauma.
@@chrisplant7273
lol
smh.
What can I say. I have a sometimes dark sense of humor. As I see, you do too.
Hook up a large tv in a public square are show it there. 😂
Fascinating summary. Explains a lot!
There's javelins from a few hundred thousand years ago probably made by Erectus found in peat preserving the wood which would have disintrigated otherwise and those javelins are perfectly made with the sharp point at the bottom of the tree limb.
Very interesting and comprehensive explanation, I would love some literature recommendations on this topic though if possible!
A brilliant man with a soothing and melodious voice.
wow so much sence in this. Thank you sir for uncovering a secrete none was daring to uncover.
I love being Whiii.. European! ;)
When I saw your thumbnail I thought "Pete Townsend has really let himself go"
Life coming through the Indus Valley was what was the theory thought before this 'out of Africa' concept. I'm beginning to doubt neither are true.
Why
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
Been pondering this question a while myself. Ty for articulating it so well
I think there is something missing in this. The imperative of need and competition would have to play a part in driving this evolution.
If you lived relatively isolated from others and if the land you occupied gave you all the things that you needed to survive, there is not much motivation to change what you have been doing for generations.
If you lived in a more hostile environment you may need to devise ways of altering your environment rather than live with it. Survival may have required inventing ways of taking resources away from others.
Perhaps the lack or abundance of what a people required to survive account for the need to change or remain the same.
Darwin evolution doesn't produce new species, but hybridisation does.
Sub-Saharan Africans are from a Cro-Magnon and Homo Erectus hybridisation.
The human races are really different human species.
@@simonruszczak5563 How can you possibly be so wrong. There is only one human race called Homo Sapiens which originated in Africa about 300 thousand years ago. World exploration out of Africa was a barrier or filter. Only the more intelligent humans ventured North into what is now Europe. This is a very complex process that explains the disparity in average IQ between sub-Saharan Africans and present Caucasians and Asians. If there were different human species, mating and reproduction would be impossible.
@@denniscliff2071 lions and tigers can breed and I'm pretty sure that mules are horse/donkey hybrids.
@@ronfroehlich4697
Mules are sterile. African/European mixed humans are not.
Ligers and Tigrons are also not sterile (at least the first generation is not, I believe), but they come with many genetic issues due to the genes not matching up. Once again, not true in humans.
Australia was pradise for many Aborigional tribes for thousends of years, plenty of game and bushtucker, they walked...there was no need for the wheel..
Lion headed man imagined lets be fair it was mushrooms...
@Glosi dove The stoned age.
Fancy dress for someone’s stag party.
But the shop was out of stag costumes.
The use of hallucinogenics by prehistoric man has now been established.
I love this dude, such a clever bloke!
😂😂
I find your talks very interesting and educational.
Very eye opening. Thanks for your videos.
I think the lack of 'drive' probably comes from those humans coming from hot regions where conserving energy, rather than expending it to keep warm, is the natural state.
Except very hot areas like Egypt and Babylon, and the tropical regions of what is now modern China spawned advanced empires long before Europe
@@viysnjor4811 lol we're talking about the development of the human condition a very long time prior to your examples. Neolithic humans didn't build the pyamids (or anything in fact), before you get too offended.
@@timmo491 It doesn't matter when we're talking about, the Egypt and Babylon were still located in extremely hot climates, and they existed before advanced civilizations in temperate and cold climates.
If your hypothesis was correct, it would show up in both cases, not just the conveniently far distance past beyond which very little to no evidence can actually be recovered
@@viysnjor4811 Give it up🙄 You are WRONG ❗
@@skillzsett7958 Nah
Fascinating. But just one thing;- Could not the Lion Man be a representation of someone - a shaman or chieftain wearing a lion's head (or a representation of a lion's head) for some ritualistic purpose?
Or maybe teaching hunting tactics to others in the group.
Of course it could. You would then need to question why a Shaman might do such a thing. We could conjecture that the intent was to capture some aspect of the lion to enhance the human. The question is; Why do these artefacts arise in Europe and not Africa? This supposes that Simon is right and that there aren't examples from Africa. Personally, I'm not convinced that Simon's views of Africa are entirely correct.
@@homefrontforge Do you mean disguising one's self as a prey animal? I don't think lions were high on the list of animals hunted for food.
@@PeterWasted Have examples of similar artefacts been found in Africa?
@@trevorhoward2254 I'm not aware of artefacts like this in Africa, but the San rock art has many similar theriomorphic examples, where half-human, half-animal figures are depicted. A lot of San art reminds me of Lascaux, Trois-Freres, Altamira, etc in Europe.
David Lewis-Williams has written extensively about the palaeolithic European cave art, comparing it with the San art. Because some San people who still practised shamanism were around, Lewis-Williams obviously asked them what their art depicted. The shamans described going into what we would call trance states, where they adopted a spirit animal form.
It is a really fascinating subject!
European growth in creative intelligence would have been a product of survival, a necessity to continue genetic lineages rather than a result of conscious choice. Peoples and inhabitants of other places never faced the same risks, thus making creativity redundant.
Absolutely correct and logical. Anyone who disagrees is either jealous or ideologically indoctrinated with fabricated revisionist history that re-imagines their ancestry. We must bring history and critical *thinking* skills back to schools.
Another fascinating video! Would make a excellent topic for a new book hint hint!
Interesting conjecture, thanks.
Brilliant, incisive, informative, factual. I love this channel
The Human Genome Project that was completed in the 1990s, where they mapped the entirety of the human DNA, it was revealed that the sub-Saharan Africans DNA contains 19% DNA of "unknown origin". Researchers could not find any ancient, human species that it could have come from.
In addition, the project also determined that 100% of sub-Saharan Africans are RH+. 2 RH+ parents cannot conceive and give birth to RH- children.
Which means that the "Out of Africa" migration theory never happened. Because if the human race had migrated out of Africa then the whole rest of the human race would also be RH+, as well as possessing this 19% DNA of unknown origin.
These genetic determinations were never published outside of the initial report findings. They were never publicly spoken of.
Chimpanzee or gorilla DNA?
I wonder how long this one will be up. I wish you had been my history teacher at school although it was 35 years ago. Mind you what you teach and what you can teach are two different things.
This is a fascinating topic.
I appreciate your work Simon. It provides me with a deeper insight into our history which we as Caucasians are all too often encouraged to forget!
In addition to DNA, it is perhaps useful to consider farming vs hunting-gathering; and climate, geography and geology, among other ideas. With regard to farming and climate, if you didn't plant in the spring in the Levant and NW Europe, you died next winter. Wth regard to geography, there are more coves and bays in the UK (I read somewhere) than there is in all of Africa. This is due to glaciers carving out the landscape during their advance; and glacial melt-water eroding it during their retreat. Bays and coves made it possible for people to go to sea to fish, explore and trade, and have a protected place to come home to. With regard to geology, there could be found tin, copper, iron ore, coal and salt among other things. Over several millenia, perhaps those who exploited these natural boons became more dominant compared to those who did not. So perhaps DNA is an important part of the puzzle - maybe even the most important - but these other factors had an effect as well.
Interesting hypotheses on specifics. It is obvious though that environment plays a role. It seems to me IQ and environment may well be in a kind of synergistic loop.
Edit: I should add other physical characteristics as well which then feed into it.
Interesting and useful. But. You only have to look at the comments on this channel to know its dominated by racists. Pure and simple. What's being promoted here is good old pseudo science. You are wasting your time. But so am I. Not sure what Mr Webbs motivation is....but I have a few suspicions which I will not
Describe. Being an anti zionist like me means its very easy to get accused of antisemitism.
DNA and its unique combinations are certainly drivers. The cunning bit is its ability to push its host,a human if you like, into the most useful situations; the nurture bit and brain development with the environmental pressures thus associated allows humans to take up advantages.. End result is that the individual is more likely to pass on that particular sequencing of DNA. Our species thrives and dominates others. Leaders and genii emerge in small numbers. Many will never fulfill their potential but some will. H. sapiens did it better than other humanoid species under the environmental conditions of the day. Europe suited us best?
I once read that global wealth was largely determined by the existence of cold winters and deep-water ports. This is because freezing cold winters are highly effective at killing off vectors of disease and the transport of goods via water is the most cost-effective.
Excellent! Just want to add Lascaux painting -20000 years in France (Dordogne). I just visited the caves were the painting are, and it's even more impressive then the pictures because there are perspective effects that were introduced in the making of the painting on purpose. Incredible.
I'm stunned that 4 days later this truth hasn't been pounced upon and taken down!
RUclips deleted my comment a few minutes ago. About 90% of my RUclips comments have been deleted .
Hi Simon. Good to listen to you.
Great stuff Simon, appreciate your work putting together these videos. All are very interesting.
When it comes to storytelling as well these things are also true. Not in a religious sense, but in tales of the common man. Original thought, innovation, creativity, it’s in our stories as well.
Are we honestly saying that the Japanese have never invented anything? Ivermectin for one, also methamphetamine, not to mention lithium-ion batteries. And the Chinese have invented a shit load of things, not just paper and gunpowder: the compass, printing, cannons, gas lighting, the list goes on. Not recently, but that's down to a repressive totalitarian regime rather than anything to do with race. Sorry, but this hypothesis is complete bunk. If it was just down to race, then all caucasians in all places at all times would have been inventing shit constantly. That's clearly not the case, it was only when the right ideas were in the culture, such as freedom of thought and speech, that started being creative and inventive.
Thank you Simon, fascinating. Sadly we are now an endangered species, last of the Neanderthal genes.
Cheers Mate 👍🏻👍🏻
Everyone on Earth has Neanderthal genes and if you go extinct pigmented humans can always birth more of you.
@@MyAb111 agreed, they are outbreeding us & the biggest problems in the world are a direct consequence of massive overpopulation.🤯
We need more of this.
The clue is in the name we came from the Caucuses mountains and not bloody Africa 👍👍👍
Mankind did NOT begin in Africa! Out of Africa has been debunked in mainstream academia. www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
So where do Mars Bars come from then?
@@painfulorwhat8872 oooh good question I heard they were born or created at a Rolling Stones Orgy I maybe wrong though 🤣🤣🤣
🤦♀️ According to German philologists Otto Schrader and Alfons A. Nehring, the Ancient Greek word Καύκασος (Kaukasos) is connected to Gothic Hauhs ("high") as well as Lithuanian Kaũkas ("hillock") and Kaukarà ("hill, top").[15][17] British linguist Adrian Room points out that Kau- also means "mountain" in Pelasgian.[18]
The best warriors, physically and strategically,sow their seed in the enemy camp.
Wonderful talk and should be taught at schools. Any chance for a book or audioscript?
It's interesting to find how much we've devolved
The more I read about evolution and the more that’s discovered about DNA, the more unlikely the whole theory becomes…
"A critical datapoint has emerged that disproves Out of Africa, not one non-African participant tested positive to any of 13 African sub-clades of haplogroup A"
Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy www.scirp.org/html/19566.html
@@johnpalmer5357 😲I’ll give it my best shot, Mr Palmer, but it sounds pretty complicated..😉
@@johnpalmer5357 Your mistake is assuming the people left in Africa never changed at all. They would've had just as much genetic divergence as every other group of people, there were many different homo sapiens groups in Africa that had all this time to mix and change the genetics from what they would've been hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Personally I believe we are not as whites descended from blacks as we have even now too many differences between us, our skulls are completely different shapes, eye colour, temperament and academic development.
Excellent article 👏 😊
Highly recommend a book by Bill Cooper called 'After the Flood: The Early Post-flood History of Europe'.
It's far more explanatory in the origins of the European people than most other materials/sources I have read.
Thanks for the recommendation! I'll check if my university library has it
It's a creationist book right? i.e. doesn't believe in evolution, the age of the universe being billions of years old, etc right?
@@Zanuka To avoid coming off as being verbose: www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/433064.After_The_Flood
If you don't want to buy it for somewhere in the region of £8-£10 then there's probably a PDF online of it somewhere also.
ruclips.net/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/видео.html
Oh darn
I see the fantasists who are uncomfortable with plain facts are out in force disliking this video.
Actually, perhaps they are purists for even this content creator subscribes to Bolshevik “subverted history” as he believes “Whites” originate in/from Africa. He is flatly wrong.
Neanderthal and Denisovan brains and skulls were larger and differently shaped compared to modern humans. Even though they had larger brains, growth was concentrated differently. In Neanderthal and Denisovan the rear and occipital lobe are larger. While in modern humans the front sections, cerebellum are larger. Which alters the shape and probably responsible for differences in skull shape as well. Also the human chin is far more pronounced compared to these ancient hominids. There were also back migrations into Africa. As there have been low levels, under 1% of Neanderthal dna found in subsaharan populations. It’s very possible that higher % of archaic genes is partially responsible for population differences. But this isn’t speciation, just genetic diversity. Abstract thinking absolutely be a part of that. It’s fairly certain that Neanderthals were super athletes, stronger, denser and more explosive than most modern humans. Which could suggest Neanderthal and Denisovan were more reliant on physical capability and less likely to have the need to develop cognitive abilities.
you are great, God bless you.
"It's just skin colour, bro."
The Chinese invented gun powder. The first cannon used in warfare, herbs for medicinal purposes, modern building techniques as in the Great Wall of China. The Chinese were also great philosophers and also were very good war strategists and were among the first to use horses in battle. They didn't invent many machines but they were very intelligent and resourceful compared to most other races/civilizations.
The Great Wall was built with rammed earth until the middle ages. No modern techniques. Chinese architecture changed little over 2000 years. The pagoda is copy of the stupa introduced to China by Islam. Chinese philosophy is a pale shadow of Greek philosophy. Concerned mainly with ethics and governing. The Chinese were not first to use the horse in battle. Horses in battle were first developed by tribes around the black sea.
The Chinese did have differential gearing on a little 2-wheeled truck they had which when man-hauled & trundled around had a mandarin like figure on top which always pointed to the North. I remember reading about it years ago.
Incidentally I was told that the reason Chicago gangsters 1920's mass-produced cars used to screech so much going around corners was because they were not supplied with differential gearing on the back axle.
Is this true?
Oh icarus, you are flying today
With Europeans, the key is, as Einstein said, " imagination".
Fantastic video mr Webb I’m now going to the comments section to see what the experts have to say
The presence of Art is evolution. Killing or Censoring Artists----is DEVOLUTION. We are currently:
D. E. V. O. L. V. I. N. G.
Gotta differ with you on the Chinese inventions bit. They also invented moveable type, which is nontrivial. My private hypothesis about the relative cultural stagnation of their empire, when it wasn't shattered by war or invasion, was that they felt they'd arrived at a system that worked and were wise enough to see that further progress had attendant pitfalls they were willing to avoid. For that reason, there was very little they were willing to import from European traders until forced by the need to defend themselves from modern external threats. That and opium, which will get in the bones of any culture once introduced.
Before I get called out for being some sort of pro-Chinese shill, I'm not at all. I very much dislike the CCP in particular. But it's important to see your opponents as clearly as possible if you want to defend yourself from them. The imitation the Chinese are doing at the moment is likely due to the way communism stamps out unique thought. They're also saving a lot of resources by doing it. The Romans did the same and reverse-engineered Carthaginian warships. The US did it with all sorts of tools and texts. It's a smart move when you're up and coming.
China had gunpowder for how many thousands of years, and it took european alchemists to figure out that mixing honey and spices in to the mixture was not a good idea. The chinese had the numbers and supplies to fight off mongels, huns, any foe, really, yet never had the courage or willpower to do so. A story of a malaysian pirate tribe stalking the coast line of china, when asked by the governor what to do, the emperor simply said move inland a mile. Why would an emperor tell his vassals to surrender an entire mile of land, when they have more than enough men to fight any foe, nearly two thirds of the world lived in china at the time, so it makes little sense, yet is a good image of chinese character. Another, is the invention of the first repeating weapon, a crossbow, by the chinese. The weapon used a lever system to redraw the crossbow, albeit to a pathetic draw, such that even a weak gambeson would be more than enough to stop it from harming the person being shot. Yet the weapon was never even intended for killing by force, such as a windlass crossbow of europe. It was instead, designed as a way of intoxicating their foe with poison, in the hopes that they would die later. What group, would think that even if I can hardly hurt my foe, and may well die for my efforts, yet instead of killing them, I should just attempt to poison them, so that even when my inherently unvalued life soon end, my commander can derive some value you from me in death. What sick culture would press humans in to such demeaning service?
Their technological renaissance also ended around the time the Mongols destroyed the Song dynasty, and started a long tradition of China being ruled by hostile foreigners.
The Chinese never had vellum or parchment which was superior to paper and preferred, even after the Europeans had paper and papyrus before that. The only option for writing in China before paper were bamboo sticks, wood or silk cloth. The Chinese never invented the book, and never adopted it for centuries after it had been introduced to them. The Chinese never developed a widespread printing of written texts.
@@glennmccrae7821 Chinese crossbows would have been ineffective against European armor. Even bronze age armor. The Chinese developed most of their philosophies during the 'warring states period'. Chinese philosophy is very modest in scope and depth compared to Greek philosophy. Chinese philosophy is mainly concerned with ethics and governing. When Chinese philosophy concerns itself with nature or the world, it is little more than statements of belief. There are no Chinese philosophers in the past 2500 years on the intellectual level of hundreds produced in the West.
@@marcv2648 interesting
This is the first time I have seen this channel relate myth as truth. While the story you tell is based on possible pasts, we have no records from this period. Had you pointed out that this was a story based on limited evidence as the wonderfully The Mammoth Hunters is an historical fiction novel by Jean M. Auel released in 1985 - its wonderfully worshipped and possible past - but it is a story - and more researched than your version. For example her hybrids are the product of rape.
The fact is that humans in paradise do not have to advance - Africans had food off trees, no need for shelter an d clothing except for comfort and only other predators forcing them to evolve at all. Everywhere else on the planet is a war zone for survival - a push for improvement.
you are completely wrong. try some more education, We DO HAVE records.. these records tell us of giant migrations... it is the GENETIC RECORD ! The record in our DNA.
@@edwardharley9
While there are facts used this story such as "The percentage of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans is zero or close to zero in people from African populations, and is about 1 to 2 percent in people of European or Asian background."
the rest is myth building. Jean M. Auel assumed the same fact s (at the time she did her work it was speculatiion, she happened to be right) and makes the same inductive fiction done in this video essay.
For example: WE do know how the breeding took place - its a guess it was rape or other. We do not know what effect it had on migration, there is no records of that. Basic science - correlation is not causation.
Auel argues that racial memory RNA was added into the mix. It could be true but is speculation.
Contrast this to Diamond explaination for the same European expansion, which is well documented and has not DNA compentent - admitidly one could alter his arugment a little why saying Germ resistance was improved in the hyrids and it played a factor, but the factor appears close to insignificant - thought its possible it was a least a minor player in this thesis.
See:
Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (previously titled Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years
The fact is that the research has not been done for this particuarl tale, so it is just a talke, not much different than specualing that human kind was seeded from other plants - except there far more research in that thesis and so far far more evidence for it as well. This aricle covers that theory and 6 others.
www.livescience.com/13363-7-theories-origin-life.html
Again my main concern is that a speculative hypothesis is told as fact, as opposed to one theory based on these facts is. Or saying "here is the unproven and disputed theory as it currently understood"
No such cavet was made.
That must be why thousands of Africans starve to death every year. Even in the late '60s when cannibalism was pretty common place. The Communists destroyed China's gene pool by killing off dissenters (Thinkers). It set them back a hundred years compared to European industrialized nations. And then there is war. Instead of sending out the 4-F people to be slaughtered, they send the fittest and brightest. War destroys and breaks up large areas of specific gene pools. Cities with a lot of machinists are that way because people used to marry in their own class and many of the children retained the skill genes. I have watched "Scientists" try to make chimpanzees human since the '50s. What they got was an animal to mimic humans. They have little ability to learn on their own. If dogs had hands, I suspect they would soon pass chimps in ability. Dogs also practice hybridization and it shows.
This has been up for 9 hrs. I doubt that you've got more than 18 left. I've downloaded it.
i see it's been 3 weeks!
@@aahpuuh That's good news.
Smart and learned Guy is our Simon. 😊😊
History Debunked, your comment, "not able to do much of very great interest" are you sure that you aren't referring to the current generation of millennials? "Remained at the same level or possibly regressed?" History is a circle and you prove it. Love your work man, you are a breath of fresh air in a stagnant world intellectually speaking.
Having lived in China for over a decade I have a running curiosity about a culture that cannot invent but can definitely counterfeit and copy. I have wondered if it's genetic, is it socialized, its both, neither, I can't explain it or even describe it and yet -there it is. Rather, there is isn't. They don't seem to have a big space in the brain for truly novel invention. I don't just mean inventing a 'Gizmo' either but I mean when put in any situation or problem where they might 'invent a new response or new way' they seem sort of stumped and won't even think to try it. It's a strange thing, probably tied up in 'filial piety' and communism and 'saving face' and so on.