My sister used a cell phone about 8 to 10 hours a day for about 10 years. Then all of a sudden she started to not be able to say what she wanted to say. Not being able to get out of bed and dress herself. If was worse some days than others. She wanted to say what she knew but could not find it how to. After she kept getting worse and tons of test of all kinds and Dr's never could come up with an answer. Teen she got to the point of not being able to do anything. And aged like hell, lost weight and is now bed ridden with the brain of an infant. This is what cell phone radiation does to your brains. It literally fry's your brains to the point you cant do a darn thing. She use to be very bright, full of energy, the star in the crowd. And now that this phone radiation messed her life 100% she can do nothing but exist. I cry so much when I see her of think of her as she is now. It all stared 11 years ago. But she has been in this worst state for the last 5 years when she got to the point of not being able to do anything. She stares at the ceiling with a scared look on her face, which is heart breaking to see. And got more skinny even though she eats alot by person feeding her and aged about 20 years+
This is me but less extreme. I look at my handgun nearly everyday for the last few years, but still hoping to find some ability to live and purpose, but 5G is killing that
EMF OverExposure triggered my seizures (computer programner for 30 years, constantly on cell phone). 3 brain surgeries to stop the seizures. my diagnosis "Mesial Temporal Sclerosis". on disability now & on meds for rest of my life
coinhawk crypto she also says Bluetooth is fine. We now know this is not true. I researched air buds and read various reviews which didn’t fare too well so at the moment I’m sticking with wired headphones / earphones. I’ve been reading reviews and Defender and Aulterra seem to be tops in the ratings dept for emf reducing cases / stickers etc but one must do their own research however tedious.
Isn't it interesting that it took 5g for us to listen.. This has been out since 2012 and if you look, the first comment was only a few months ago.. nobody talks about it...
@@tishtashtishtash My brother in law got brain cancer from his phone because he use to call his wife everynight as a trucker.. nothing "crackpot" about it.
@@markallensnow925 That would be impressive since cellphones don't cause brain cancer. He happened to have brain cancer and you automatically associated it with cellphones. What makes you think it was cellphones? Sorry about your brother-in-law. Cellphone use skyrocketed and there was no increase in brain cancers. If they indeed caused brain cancer, you would expect a proportional rise. Yet, it stayed the same. High quality studies indicate no correlation between cellphone use and cancer, brain or otherwise.
@@markallensnow925 What makes it "crackpot" is the absence of any physical mechanism through which they would cause cancer, and evidence of that mechanism doing so. All there is is low quality rat studies exposed to much more radiation than you ever will, which were replicated only to find that the results were not the same, plus a bunch of low quality studies , done by the same researchers. On the other hand you have the Interphone study which took a lot of high quality studies on the matter and concluded that there was no increase in incidence of brain cancer. There was also a Danish study of 420,000 people that found no association. You know what that means? You have a bunch of low quality studies, a lot of which have failed to be reproduced, versus enormous long term studies which were based on solid data that conclude there's no link. When you look at the evidence as a whole, when you ask "do cellphones cause cancer?" it's a big resounding "NO!!" from scientists. Dr. Davis, despite being a reputable doctor, for some reason decided to cherry pick to support her fear of cellphones. Any reputable researcher knows to look at the totality of evidence, and the great majority, which includes the higher quality studies, points to "no". Your brother-in-law had bad luck. Heck, something like 50% of cancers are due to luck.
That’s not down to cell phones being dangerous that’s down to idiots using them being dangerous. Which is why if you get caught on your phone here it’s a straight 6 points on your license.
Truth givers do not leave the awakened without solution and hope. They include the solution.. the way out of the danger zone. And if the awalened obeys and thus escapes from the danger zone, there is no more reason to fear but prospects of a safe and beautiful future. Hence, hope! Not fear.
Radiation is light. Light hurts you? You do know that those waves you claim to be sensitive to are constantly around you all the time, everywhere, whether you use the phone or not? I would advise doing a blind test with a friend to test this sensitivity. Everyone with claims like yours who was tested completely failed their tests, I see no reason for it being any different with you.
@@genericnamethingy If you use the term light, it seems innocent and harmless. but if we look at it in the prism of dissonant vs resonant frequency which is present in both sound and light, then, we can come to understanding that it is the dissonant frequency INSIDE THAT LIGHT that is the culprit.
@@alyarednesher8663this is complete gibberish. None of the words you used were related to the topic, but I suppose you threw them in there because they sounded intelligent. Dissonance has nothing to do with this, and neither does resonance.
Don't know if any one else has looked into tech rollout and flu out break. 3G rollout 2002 same year SARS flu out break 2002- 4G rollout 2009 same year H1N1 flu out break 2009. Sounds like Air wave tech does weaken our bodies Immune system. Sounds like other air wave tech roll outs in the past have flu out breaks at the same time. Stay healthy.
@@geraud8245 yh i he just pointing correlation not necessarily causation since the radiation effects would require long term appliance to reduce immune health by noticeable markers
Politicians never put their cell on speaker because they have sensitive conversations. We have 3 politicians now who suffered from brain tumors in the area that a cell phone would be while talking. Sen. Ted Kennedy , Sen. John McCain , and President Carter . Do you think it is safe to put a cell next to your brain ??
ABOUT ALLEGED FEAR MONGERING Telling the truths about existing harms and dangers is not fear-mongering... it is enlightening the ignorant person so that he will see the real dangers, feel the initial fear which is necessary, and then take the advised precautions, stop the causes, and so, feel relief (no more fear) for being now sure that he has stopped or avoided the causes of illnesses and avoided all dangers. So how does truth including the negative truth, end up in fear? Telling the negative truth, that is, informing people about bad causes and their dangers, such as wifi or dissonant frequency and its dangers, is not fear-mongering. It is causing the people to see, see the real dangers, then fear the potential (coming) dangers, make the necessary steps to stop the causes to stop the dangers, hence, gets out of the danger zone and comes into the safe zone, where he can truly feel relief and safe... So where is fear there? How can fear remain in that process? This process does not let fear linger, it drives away fear instead. Truth drives away fear. Lies or covering up the causes may not cause the deceived one fear (Ignorance is bliss, so they say) as he continues to activate or do the causes the dangers ... but sooner or later, as soon as the dangers become reality.. become real sufferings... real illnesses and calamities... new kinds of fear afflict the deceived one! And as he becomes more and more confused, and the harms increasingly afflict him, the greater and more varied his fears are and will be! There is no fear-mongering here, maybe, but in his stead is fear builder. He who obstructs the telling of the negative truths (truths that expose the dangers) is not fear mongering.. he fear building! Truth must be told, whether or not it will create fear at first. Fear at the initial stage is helpful. This type of fear will move people to make pre-cautions. As the saying goes, "A wise man foresees danger and avoid it. The simpleton may see it too but bump into it." *** Correlation may not always be causation. The link may not automatically establish that it is the cause. But more often than not, further investigation would show that, more often than not, CORRELATION IS CAUSATION! ... which shows that what your "ordinary mind" is and has been telling you.. is true but which the wicked type of Science wants to negate by telling you the lie that "you cannot trust yourself" and that "you need others, namely: the authorities to tell you what is true and what is not." And because of this, people no longer trust themselves.. no longer trust their own experiences... and they bought the next lie that personal experiences are anecdotal evidence which cannot be accepted by the grand jury call Science. Well, for the truly learned, this grand Jury is Fake Science. True Science recognizes anecdotal evidence as valid and solid evidence. True Science believes the stories of patients who discovered links between the effects and their real cause/s. True Science, unlike Fake Liar Science, gives great importance to testimonies of patients and do not call them "anecdotes." Telling the truths about existing harms and dangers is not fear-mongering... it is enlightening the ignorant person so that he will see the real dangers, feel the initial fear which is necessary, and then take the advised precautions, stop the causes, and so, feel relief (no more fear) for being now sure that he has stopped or avoided the causes of illnesses and avoided all dangers. So how does truth including the negative truth, end up in fear?
I still dont quite understand how the modulation, or "cell phone pulsing" affects people? She kind of uses cause and effect, without really explaining the effect?
My students are informed about this all the time, but their social media and games are far more important.
A brave woman! Thank you!
My sister used a cell phone about 8 to 10 hours a day for about 10 years. Then all of a sudden she started to not be able to say what she wanted to say. Not being able to get out of bed and dress herself. If was worse some days than others. She wanted to say what she knew but could not find it how to. After she kept getting worse and tons of test of all kinds and Dr's never could come up with an answer. Teen she got to the point of not being able to do anything. And aged like hell, lost weight and is now bed ridden with the brain of an infant.
This is what cell phone radiation does to your brains. It literally fry's your brains to the point you cant do a darn thing. She use to be very bright, full of energy, the star in the crowd. And now that this phone radiation messed her life 100% she can do nothing but exist. I cry so much when I see her of think of her as she is now. It all stared 11 years ago. But she has been in this worst state for the last 5 years when she got to the point of not being able to do anything. She stares at the ceiling with a scared look on her face, which is heart breaking to see. And got more skinny even though she eats alot by person feeding her and aged about 20 years+
This is me but less extreme. I look at my handgun nearly everyday for the last few years, but still hoping to find some ability to live and purpose, but 5G is killing that
You’ve basically described Alzheimer’s (which cell phones also don’t cause).
@@tishtashtishtash haha so true, really funny that people are easily persuaded by this pseudoscience
EMF OverExposure triggered my seizures (computer programner for 30 years, constantly on cell phone). 3 brain surgeries to stop the seizures. my diagnosis "Mesial Temporal Sclerosis". on disability now & on meds for rest of my life
here in march 2020... 5 g .... plus corona .... effects on the body, lungs...
coinhawk crypto she also says Bluetooth is fine. We now know this is not true. I researched air buds and read various reviews which didn’t fare too well so at the moment I’m sticking with wired headphones / earphones. I’ve been reading reviews and Defender and Aulterra seem to be tops in the ratings dept for emf reducing cases / stickers etc but one must do their own research however tedious.
I'm a woman and I'm ready to practice safe phone. I'm 25 - 10 solid years of excessive use. I have to quit.
Thank you Dr Davies. Such an amazing breath of freash air in the 5g corona cover up.
Isn't it interesting that it took 5g for us to listen.. This has been out since 2012 and if you look, the first comment was only a few months ago.. nobody talks about it...
Mark Allen Snow Because it’s a crackpot theory based on the feeling of someone’s little toe, not science.
@@tishtashtishtash My brother in law got brain cancer from his phone because he use to call his wife everynight as a trucker.. nothing "crackpot" about it.
@@markallensnow925 That would be impressive since cellphones don't cause brain cancer. He happened to have brain cancer and you automatically associated it with cellphones. What makes you think it was cellphones? Sorry about your brother-in-law.
Cellphone use skyrocketed and there was no increase in brain cancers. If they indeed caused brain cancer, you would expect a proportional rise. Yet, it stayed the same. High quality studies indicate no correlation between cellphone use and cancer, brain or otherwise.
@@markallensnow925 What makes it "crackpot" is the absence of any physical mechanism through which they would cause cancer, and evidence of that mechanism doing so. All there is is low quality rat studies exposed to much more radiation than you ever will, which were replicated only to find that the results were not the same, plus a bunch of low quality studies , done by the same researchers. On the other hand you have the Interphone study which took a lot of high quality studies on the matter and concluded that there was no increase in incidence of brain cancer. There was also a Danish study of 420,000 people that found no association. You know what that means? You have a bunch of low quality studies, a lot of which have failed to be reproduced, versus enormous long term studies which were based on solid data that conclude there's no link. When you look at the evidence as a whole, when you ask "do cellphones cause cancer?" it's a big resounding "NO!!" from scientists. Dr. Davis, despite being a reputable doctor, for some reason decided to cherry pick to support her fear of cellphones. Any reputable researcher knows to look at the totality of evidence, and the great majority, which includes the higher quality studies, points to "no". Your brother-in-law had bad luck. Heck, something like 50% of cancers are due to luck.
There is no doubt that cell-phones are dangerous, you never know if the driver coming towards you is looking at the road or his cell-phone.
I live in Asia, so I have no doubt that 100% of the drivers around me are surfing Facebook on their phones while driving. 😳
That’s not down to cell phones being dangerous that’s down to idiots using them being dangerous. Which is why if you get caught on your phone here it’s a straight 6 points on your license.
Thank you so much 💯
I'm a woman. Representing the women in this comment section the host said there wouldn't be many of.
Explains all the ‘Fertility Clinics’ gearing up for business. Skin cancer out, infertility in.
That's possibly from the vacks too.
So.... will you get better if you stop can you heal?
Truth givers do not leave the awakened without solution and hope. They include the solution.. the way out of the danger zone. And if the awalened obeys and thus escapes from the danger zone, there is no more reason to fear but prospects of a safe and beautiful future. Hence, hope! Not fear.
Dr. Davis, have you updated your book 'Disconnect'?
What a Queen
Tobacco did have a positive function. It is an important healing herb to Native Americans.
Yes and it was touted as a weight loss aide too. Which it really was.
Thank you very much. I am sensitive to the frequencies and I cannot use the phone, because of the pain I get from the radiation.
How are you commenting this video then ?
Radiation is light. Light hurts you? You do know that those waves you claim to be sensitive to are constantly around you all the time, everywhere, whether you use the phone or not? I would advise doing a blind test with a friend to test this sensitivity. Everyone with claims like yours who was tested completely failed their tests, I see no reason for it being any different with you.
So do you live in the jungle?
@@genericnamethingy If you use the term light, it seems innocent and harmless. but if we look at it in the prism of dissonant vs resonant frequency which is present in both sound and light, then, we can come to understanding that it is the dissonant frequency INSIDE THAT LIGHT that is the culprit.
@@alyarednesher8663this is complete gibberish. None of the words you used were related to the topic, but I suppose you threw them in there because they sounded intelligent.
Dissonance has nothing to do with this, and neither does resonance.
This includes:
Wi-Fi wireless ANY DEVICE
I’m here! And I’m a woman.
Nice
Don't know if any one else has looked into tech rollout and flu out break. 3G rollout 2002 same year SARS flu out break 2002- 4G rollout 2009 same
year H1N1 flu out break 2009. Sounds like Air wave tech does weaken our
bodies Immune system. Sounds like other air wave tech roll outs in the past have flu out breaks at the same time. Stay healthy.
yes Tim
And for the MERS, or Ebola ?
@@geraud8245 yh i he just pointing correlation not necessarily causation since the radiation effects would require long term appliance to reduce immune health by noticeable markers
Yeah, but this cycle, minus the phones, has literally been happening since the beginning of time.
The Marine yep, clearly no cell phones during WW1
Politicians never put their cell on speaker because they have sensitive conversations. We have 3 politicians now who suffered from brain tumors in the area that a cell phone would be while talking. Sen. Ted Kennedy , Sen. John McCain , and President Carter . Do you think it is safe to put a cell next to your brain ??
They were prone to have brain cancer. Cancer isn't as rare as it is set out to be. Live long enough and you too will get cancer
1/3 women experience cancer and 1/2 men experience cancer. Correlation and causation
ABOUT ALLEGED FEAR MONGERING
Telling the truths about existing harms and dangers is not fear-mongering... it is enlightening the ignorant person so that he will see the real dangers, feel the initial fear which is necessary, and then take the advised precautions, stop the causes, and so, feel relief (no more fear) for being now sure that he has stopped or avoided the causes of illnesses and avoided all dangers. So how does truth including the negative truth, end up in fear?
Telling the negative truth, that is, informing people about bad causes and their dangers, such as wifi or dissonant frequency and its dangers, is not fear-mongering. It is causing the people to see, see the real dangers, then fear the potential (coming) dangers, make the necessary steps to stop the causes to stop the dangers, hence, gets out of the danger zone and comes into the safe zone, where he can truly feel relief and safe... So where is fear there? How can fear remain in that process? This process does not let fear linger, it drives away fear instead. Truth drives away fear. Lies or covering up the causes may not cause the deceived one fear (Ignorance is bliss, so they say) as he continues to activate or do the causes the dangers ... but sooner or later, as soon as the dangers become reality.. become real sufferings... real illnesses and calamities... new kinds of fear afflict the deceived one! And as he becomes more and more confused, and the harms increasingly afflict him, the greater and more varied his fears are and will be! There is no fear-mongering here, maybe, but in his stead is fear builder. He who obstructs the telling of the negative truths (truths that expose the dangers) is not fear mongering.. he fear building!
Truth must be told, whether or not it will create fear at first. Fear at the initial stage is helpful. This type of fear will move people to make pre-cautions. As the saying goes, "A wise man foresees danger and avoid it. The simpleton may see it too but bump into it."
***
Correlation may not always be causation. The link may not automatically establish that it is the cause. But more often than not, further investigation would show that, more often than not, CORRELATION IS CAUSATION! ... which shows that what your "ordinary mind" is and has been telling you.. is true but which the wicked type of Science wants to negate by telling you the lie that "you cannot trust yourself" and that "you need others, namely: the authorities to tell you what is true and what is not."
And because of this, people no longer trust themselves.. no longer trust their own experiences... and they bought the next lie that personal experiences are anecdotal evidence which cannot be accepted by the grand jury call Science.
Well, for the truly learned, this grand Jury is Fake Science. True Science recognizes anecdotal evidence as valid and solid evidence. True Science believes the stories of patients who discovered links between the effects and their real cause/s. True Science, unlike Fake Liar Science, gives great importance to testimonies of patients and do not call them "anecdotes."
Telling the truths about existing harms and dangers is not fear-mongering... it is enlightening the ignorant person so that he will see the real dangers, feel the initial fear which is necessary, and then take the advised precautions, stop the causes, and so, feel relief (no more fear) for being now sure that he has stopped or avoided the causes of illnesses and avoided all dangers. So how does truth including the negative truth, end up in fear?
Mmmmmmmmmmmm. No your wrong. It's fear mongering.
Ye 2020 On Phone PLEASE DONT USE YOUR PHONE You:Watching the vid on ya phone how we communicate
My point exactly and again.....what's the need of the phones anyway
I still dont quite understand how the modulation, or "cell phone pulsing" affects people? She kind of uses cause and effect, without really explaining the effect?
BRAIN DAMAGE, PARTICULARLY, IN THE YOUNG.
@@ROSEMARYHEATHER-m7h yeah, okay. But how? She never explains.
Where can you find a headset like hers you can plug to the phone?
Amazon
This woman turns this 30 year old on for some reason lool. Our future is foooooked, judge dread in relation to the topic
The foetus suffers.
Thanks! Now measure electric cars. ☢️
You have an AM and FM transmitter and receiver in your old car. You have cancer?
Read the warning on them old cb antennas. They radiate around 25 mhz. Electric motors radiate 60-1000 MHz. 💫
NOBODY BLAMES IT ON MERCURY
⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️
Dr. Davis, could you tell us about the dangers of 5G versus 4G? I'm afraid of 5G.
3G 4G 5G SAME
no dangers, look up is 5g harmful and watch the first video
I'm a woman watching
So, what does microwaving the world have to do with climate change? You'd have to deny physics to say no.
Man has a redder face than the president
Does anybody here remember Barrington Hall ?????
Does anybody here remember Barrington ??????
Please include a link for further information.
No, nobody remembers that, must have been a remarkable incident eh!
Any recollection of Barrington
❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓
@@stevenmills6502 I spent the last hour thinking about it, still nothing comes to mind!
Tech Crunch fellow has defensive body language.
I’m a