8b)Jan-2020-QP-Laplace Transform of periodic Signal

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 янв 2025
  • Laplace Transform of non-sinusoidal waveform. Waveform synthesis is explained in easiest way.

Комментарии • 19

  • @syedhussain4496
    @syedhussain4496 3 года назад +14

    Shouldn't it be 1-e^TS at 13:25? Can you explain if I'm wrong?

    • @VBDclasses
      @VBDclasses  3 года назад +4

      Hello Syed happy for your reply. Yes you are right, in hurry i forgot to write that term. Thank you.

    • @piggypiggy855
      @piggypiggy855 2 года назад

      Thank you for this video sir .

    • @Suraj-g8g
      @Suraj-g8g 4 месяца назад

      Then what is correct answer ​@@VBDclasses

    • @VBDclasses
      @VBDclasses  4 месяца назад +1

      @@syedhussain4496 yes you are absolutely right. Small mistake. I will correct it

    • @Mr.ghost.edits45
      @Mr.ghost.edits45 2 дня назад

      Sir can't understand pls help me in introduction 😢

  • @Faidakadango
    @Faidakadango 8 месяцев назад +4

    Great sir, but why is the magnitude of the signal at x2(t)=-2

  • @Rutuja05S
    @Rutuja05S Месяц назад +1

    At x(2)t why magnitude is taken as -2

    • @VBDclasses
      @VBDclasses  Месяц назад

      Magnitude of signal is +1, to being it to -1, we need to add -2.

  • @karthikkv7585
    @karthikkv7585 3 года назад +1

    Omg . Sir you are great!

    • @VBDclasses
      @VBDclasses  3 года назад +1

      Thank you kartik. All the best. Do well.

  • @bhavan45
    @bhavan45 2 года назад +6

    Sir Why the magnitude is -2?

    • @virupaxidalal5258
      @virupaxidalal5258 2 года назад +1

      Because by adding -2 to +1 we get -1 .

    • @meerasabmulla4646
      @meerasabmulla4646 Год назад +5

      ​@@virupaxidalal5258 sir I can't understand could you explain once time for -2

    • @srsniperlord7085
      @srsniperlord7085 Месяц назад

      @@virupaxidalal5258 can u clear this doubt ..?

  • @piev4166
    @piev4166 Год назад

    shouldn't the magnitude of one cycle of the periodic signal end at +1 x(t) magnitude instead of 0? that should make the last part of signal +2u(t-2T) and not +u(t-2T), right?

  • @----deep------2659
    @----deep------2659 23 дня назад

    Kattli show video hai yr

  • @KarthikBelli-h3q
    @KarthikBelli-h3q 7 месяцев назад +1

    Can u send your mail sir

    • @VBDclasses
      @VBDclasses  7 месяцев назад +1

      dalal.virupaxi@gmail.com