@@chillbizz74 yeah but it’s nothing to the horror in the minds of modern people I mean one example which maybe not similar to the saw blade science but terrifying as it And that is Winnie the Pooh blood and honey
For those who say that it is still protected by copyright, well know that this short film was banned worldwide, following this event, given that Disney did not renew the copyright, well it's in the public domain
@vidiot380 You can use elements that originated from this short, like the Mad Doctor himself. Pluto appeared in other shorts before this one, so you can’t use him until his first short “The Chain Gang” enters public domain next year.
When comparing the animation of this film, especially the use of lighting and shadow, one can see the advancements made between Steamboat Willy (1928), and this film from 1933.
The short entered the public domain because Disney didn’t renew the copyright, as required. However, elements of the short, including Pluto and aspects of Mickey’s design, remain under copyright until 2029. Edit: However, the Mad Doctor character himself is public domain in accordance with his appearance in this short under American copyright law.
Epic Mickey was my introduction to The Mad Doctor and of course Oswald too. I thought I made sense to make the secondary and primary villain of Epic Mickey 1 and 2 to be the villain from one of the most terrifying and darkest Mickey cartoon.
This cartoon scared me when I was ten. I remember watching it on Disney Channel's "The Ink And Paint Club" at 5:00 A.M. I had the habit of waking up SUPER early on school days in order to watch cartoons on Disney Channel and Cartoon Network (Plus, "Sailor Moon" and "Poke'mon"). And, In the dark, of course. The scene that forever ingrained itself in my young mind was the part where Doctor XXX sings about cutting off Pluto's head and grafting it onto the chicken's body. 😣 It was that scene (Plus the fact that I am a geek for all things animated!😅) that lead me to rediscovering this classic as an adult.
This short was made after Steamboat Willie but entered public domain much earlier (at the time you had to renew copyright and it laster for a lot less time, Disney for some reason did not bother renewing)... so actually, this more classic version of Mickey Mouse (white gloves, big shoes) has been public domain for a long time, but it became public knowledge only when the first cartoon (no gloves nor shoes) also entered public domain
@@KyrieFortune Oh, interesting, I guess people just forgot, This does mean that anyone who announced media based on Mickey on January 1st has a perfect defense if Disney ever tries to attack anyone using the fact they were working on projects before 2024 as excuse to sue. Also, I hear his red shorts and yellow gloves are proper fair game too, as a really old poster was rememberer recently that fits the dates.
@@_-Lx-_ This version of Mickey was not public domain because this design was used in other cartoons prior to The Mad Doctor. There's nothing preventing you from working on projects prior to the source materials entering the public domain, you just can't trade on, promote, or *release* the project until the source material has entered the public domain.
Remember when Disney traded a real life human being to get the rights for Oswald back? And how they then used him like, 2 times notably, and a handful of cameos, and then nothing else with him? That's hilarious to me, LMAO, And well, I guess he's free to use for all of us unless trading him interrupted anything.
@@alvaro4996 He was some popular sports commentator, Disney owned the employment rights of his sports commentary stuff and had him hired under them in some form. The Company Disney was trying to negotiate for Oswald from ended up taking intrest in him, so they Traded the legal rights of Oswald for the distrubution and management of the Sports Commentary stuff. It's just absolutely hilarious they traded an actual guy for a cartoon rabbit it a sense, even if it was a rare time Disney did such a situation ethically withiut actual issue. I wonder if that guy woke up one day, and got a call ftom Disney saying they were trading his employment for Oswad, and how he would have reacted, LOL. And yeah, the fact they ended up just forgetting about Oswald incredibly quickly is even more hilarious, and very ironic considering that's the entite plot of Epic Mickey.
Ah, I think I had forgotton about this one, though parts here seem familair now that I rewatch. Anyway, guess this is where the Mad Doctor they used in Epic Mickey made his debut. It's cool seeing all the various first apperences of characters in series in general. They used a bunch of spesific exact references to this short in that game now that I think about it, cool to notice all the spesific things here and there that get called back to decades later across various places. Also, NGL, this legit holds up better than a large amount of Disney's output these recent years, and unfortunately that's not hyperbole, This still is a classic very creative smoothly animated short, and Disney is on their current losing streak and decline for good reason. And yeah, cool you're uploading all these things as they become fully free to use for the public, Major win for the public domain and copyright, And you're doing a great job compiling this for each spesific case of becoming free to the public.
I remember watching this back in 2010 when Epic Mickey released. It was one of the extra shorts you could watch. Weirdly enough...wasn't traumatised back then 😂.
This short is in the public domain. But some aspects of the short like plutos appearance and this mickey design dosen't go into the public domain until 2029.
You know, Disney never renewed this short's copyright, so doesn't that mean Pluto is already in the public domain? And doesn't that mean Mickey has technically been in the public domain for a while? (Also Mickey's design with gloves?)
I do just want to ask for anyone viewing this: is this short canonical to Epic Mickey, since Epic Mickey does use the mad doctor as the main villain? If so, how does that work, since it’s revealed he’s in a dream?
Likely half canon I'd assume, Most cartoons and franchises of this type don't have hard exact continuity. The events likely have some grounds, but they would play loose in how much of it happened and most wouldn't be worth adressing, as the Mickey Mouse Canon Lore isn't exactly a common talking point.
In Mickey Mouse canon, all the characters are actors who work for Disney. It's a lot like the movie Roger Rabbit, although that's probably because they made that movie. Also, Walt Disney himself said that Mickey and Minnie the actors were married, and that they only played characters who weren't. How does all this fit into Epic Mickey lore? IDK, maybe the actor was mad (of course he is, he's the _Mad_ Doctor) okay, maybe he got _angry_ that he was never a popular character, and he only got to appear once. So he went postal?
@@Wendy_O._Koopa So like, when the characters were forgotton, were they fired, kicked to the street, and then fired from a canon into a basement into a portal or something that had them end up in that abandoned land of Disney IPs Epic Mickey takes place in? Because like, how did that end up happening then anyway, LOL.
@@_-Lx-_ I mean, that is kind of the entire premise of the sub-franchise. "Where did all those forgotten characters go?" They went here, where the game takes place. I guess it didn't explore the "how" part very well though, did it?
@@Wendy_O._Koopa Yeah, there was really no explanation, but if it follows the idea of the whole shorts prior being characters being actors it'a even motr confusing how they would end up there. Though I guess it could easily be explained via saying Epic Mickey is also a show or such the fictional "actors" worked on, with a reuinon of everyone. Though all the kinda "lore/canon" to justify this just sounds like a copout anwser, easier to say it just really doesn't matter and they do whatever they feel like for each entry being flexible, Hell, even series with more of an established history/mythos such as Zelda say that the timeline is just a looser idea and flexible to whatever they feel like doing, yet alone cartoon logic series like Mickey that have each entry in a vaccumn, so I don't think anyone is taking Mickey lore seriously anyway, this is all incredibly funny goofy (hyuck) ideas and questions to think about though. Also yeah, they really did zero explaining of how Epic Mickey even really happened or those characters were discarded, I know it was mainly just a concept for very weird cool experimental dark fantasy take on Disney, but is weird they didn't even attempt to explain those things considering it was aiming for a more serious story in ways. Does showcase how the game is incredibly flawed despite it's bold artistic vision.
Damn the animation on these were so great I would love to see someone actually make a horror movie just in Black and white cartoons Like make cartoons slashers body horror Torture porn Supernatural horror Just in black and white cartoons With their own original characters I think that would be so cool Using stop motion pictures Perfect designs so much more
wild af. not surprised that this episode is in public domain (although pluto appears whos still in copyright so i guess this short is partially public domain)
But the mad scientist doesn’t look anything like The Terrible Blot when decloaked. Iirc TTB looked like a caricature of Walt himself, as a joke by Floyd Gotfredson. Still, this must be the first inkling towards that figure.
The short’s already public domain as Disney didn’t renew the copyright as required at the time. However, aspects of the short remain under copyright until 2029
im pretty sure that mickey with the gloves AND the coloured outfit is in the public domain, considering his gloves showed up in the title card for steamboat willie and mickey was advertised at the time in his red shorts and yellow gloves
False, this cartoon indeed isn’t part of the public domain but the reply above me is right EDIT: TURNS OUT THIS SHORT ACTUALLY IS PUBLIC DOMAIN BECAUSE THEY FORGOT TO RENEW IT “This short is in the public domain, because Disney did not renew the copyright as was required at the time. However, elements of the short, including Pluto and aspects of Mickey's design, remain under copyright until 2029 at the latest.”
Disney decided to nix this short from their catalogue due to the dark horror themes, and as such neglected to or opted not to renew copyright. However, the way Mickey is depicted in this short, the general design characteristics and appearance of Mickey and Pluto remain protected under copyright
You can't copyright nothing If it's not changed or edited It still keeps the same elements that Walt Disney created I remember watching this movie when I was a kid Still hilarious as ever
apparently the movie is public domain as Disney didn't renew the copyright, as they decided to nix this from the Mickey catalogue due to the dark theming. unlike Steamboat Willie, the character designs in this movie are still protected until 95 years have passed since the movie was originally published
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
This was honestly one of the DARKEST Mickey Mouse shorts in my opinion, probably the scariest "nightmare type" episode
It’s debatable by todays standards this is tame as an toothless old dog
@@MitchTaylor-x8cstill had some terrifying moments like experiment being messed up and the sawblade scare
@@chillbizz74 yeah but it’s nothing to the horror in the minds of modern people I mean one example which maybe not similar to the saw blade science but terrifying as it
And that is Winnie the Pooh blood and honey
@@MitchTaylor-x8c horror these days is just jump scaring you or just showing a gory kill, which yeah can be done right but it's usually cheaply done.
@@chillbizz74 exactly there’s no effort at all I mean have you heard the first things that are being used with mickey
For those who say that it is still protected by copyright, well know that this short film was banned worldwide, following this event, given that Disney did not renew the copyright, well it's in the public domain
All I know is with the state of Disney
This is what they deserve for being woke idiots
Does that technically mean we can use THIS mickey mouse aswell?
@vidiot380 You can use elements that originated from this short, like the Mad Doctor himself. Pluto appeared in other shorts before this one, so you can’t use him until his first short “The Chain Gang” enters public domain next year.
@@Hurtle885hu8bu Alright.
@@probablysnicNo, that the film
When comparing the animation of this film, especially the use of lighting and shadow, one can see the advancements made between Steamboat Willy (1928), and this film from 1933.
It’s amazing how far they’d come already.
5 years are a lot guys
When several Mickey episodes become public domain, they should make a compilation called "Every Mickey Ever"
Yeah that’ll just take another few decades
The short entered the public domain because Disney didn’t renew the copyright, as required. However, elements of the short, including Pluto and aspects of Mickey’s design, remain under copyright until 2029.
Edit: However, the Mad Doctor character himself is public domain in accordance with his appearance in this short under American copyright law.
That "3d" tunnel effect at 1:54 still looks really well done.
Must’ve taken a lot of drawings to accomplish this
Epic Mickey was my introduction to The Mad Doctor and of course Oswald too. I thought I made sense to make the secondary and primary villain of Epic Mickey 1 and 2 to be the villain from one of the most terrifying and darkest Mickey cartoon.
It was also featured in "Mickey mania" for various consoles in the 90s
3:19 This was basically the first villain song in Disney history.
This cartoon scared me when I was ten.
I remember watching it on Disney Channel's "The Ink And Paint Club" at 5:00 A.M.
I had the habit of waking up SUPER early on school days in order to watch cartoons on Disney Channel and Cartoon Network (Plus, "Sailor Moon" and "Poke'mon"). And, In the dark, of course.
The scene that forever ingrained itself in my young mind was the part where Doctor XXX sings about cutting off Pluto's head and grafting it onto the chicken's body.
😣
It was that scene (Plus the fact that I am a geek for all things animated!😅) that lead me to rediscovering this classic as an adult.
Well, at least it was all a dream. I was getting so saddened for Mickey and poor little Pluto 🥺
One of the only mickey Shows used before steamboat Willie
This short was made after Steamboat Willie but entered public domain much earlier (at the time you had to renew copyright and it laster for a lot less time, Disney for some reason did not bother renewing)... so actually, this more classic version of Mickey Mouse (white gloves, big shoes) has been public domain for a long time, but it became public knowledge only when the first cartoon (no gloves nor shoes) also entered public domain
@@KyrieFortune
Oh, interesting,
I guess people just forgot,
This does mean that anyone who announced media based on Mickey on January 1st has a perfect defense if Disney ever tries to attack anyone using the fact they were working on projects before 2024 as excuse to sue.
Also, I hear his red shorts and yellow gloves are proper fair game too, as a really old poster was rememberer recently that fits the dates.
@@_-Lx-_ This version of Mickey was not public domain because this design was used in other cartoons prior to The Mad Doctor. There's nothing preventing you from working on projects prior to the source materials entering the public domain, you just can't trade on, promote, or *release* the project until the source material has entered the public domain.
Basically, characters around a time period like this are public domain (mad doctor, oswald, mickey, etc)
Remember when Disney traded a real life human being to get the rights for Oswald back?
And how they then used him like, 2 times notably, and a handful of cameos, and then nothing else with him?
That's hilarious to me, LMAO,
And well, I guess he's free to use for all of us unless trading him interrupted anything.
@@_-Lx-_I need context of the human being
@@alvaro4996
He was some popular sports commentator, Disney owned the employment rights of his sports commentary stuff and had him hired under them in some form.
The Company Disney was trying to negotiate for Oswald from ended up taking intrest in him, so they Traded the legal rights of Oswald for the distrubution and management of the Sports Commentary stuff.
It's just absolutely hilarious they traded an actual guy for a cartoon rabbit it a sense, even if it was a rare time Disney did such a situation ethically withiut actual issue.
I wonder if that guy woke up one day, and got a call ftom Disney saying they were trading his employment for Oswad, and how he would have reacted, LOL.
And yeah, the fact they ended up just forgetting about Oswald incredibly quickly is even more hilarious, and very ironic considering that's the entite plot of Epic Mickey.
Ah, I think I had forgotton about this one, though parts here seem familair now that I rewatch.
Anyway, guess this is where the Mad Doctor they used in Epic Mickey made his debut.
It's cool seeing all the various first apperences of characters in series in general.
They used a bunch of spesific exact references to this short in that game now that I think about it, cool to notice all the spesific things here and there that get called back to decades later across various places.
Also, NGL, this legit holds up better than a large amount of Disney's output these recent years, and unfortunately that's not hyperbole,
This still is a classic very creative smoothly animated short, and Disney is on their current losing streak and decline for good reason.
And yeah, cool you're uploading all these things as they become fully free to use for the public,
Major win for the public domain and copyright,
And you're doing a great job compiling this for each spesific case of becoming free to the public.
The original Mickey Mouse cartoon to fall into the public domain.
I remember watching this back in 2010 when Epic Mickey released. It was one of the extra shorts you could watch. Weirdly enough...wasn't traumatised back then 😂.
I watched it on RUclips in 2008 during my hunt for classic shows.
I just wanna say breeding a dog and a chicken together is wild asf💀
No its more like cutting the pieces and stitching them together
This short is in the public domain.
But some aspects of the short like plutos appearance and this mickey design dosen't go into the public domain until 2029.
Tho. Pluto will enter the public domain in 2026 since he first appeared in 1930’s “The Chain Gang”.
This one was my favorite when I was a kid
Kevin Flaherty: At 3:56 Oh No. THIS is a nightmare here.
Kevin Flaherty: At 6:22 Thank God it was only a dream.
You know, Disney never renewed this short's copyright, so doesn't that mean Pluto is already in the public domain? And doesn't that mean Mickey has technically been in the public domain for a while?
(Also Mickey's design with gloves?)
No, Pluto’s not in the public domain, and neither is the aspect of Mickey’s design.
However, would this villain be public domain since this is his presumably his only appearance?
@iantaakalla8180 yea, only him is public domain rn
Pluto will enter the public domain in 2026 since he made his debut in 1930’s “The Chain Gang”.
Mickey wakes up having a nightmare
Steamboat Willie would have cleaned the Doctors clock
I do just want to ask for anyone viewing this: is this short canonical to Epic Mickey, since Epic Mickey does use the mad doctor as the main villain? If so, how does that work, since it’s revealed he’s in a dream?
Likely half canon I'd assume,
Most cartoons and franchises of this type don't have hard exact continuity.
The events likely have some grounds, but they would play loose in how much of it happened and most wouldn't be worth adressing, as the Mickey Mouse Canon Lore isn't exactly a common talking point.
In Mickey Mouse canon, all the characters are actors who work for Disney. It's a lot like the movie Roger Rabbit, although that's probably because they made that movie. Also, Walt Disney himself said that Mickey and Minnie the actors were married, and that they only played characters who weren't. How does all this fit into Epic Mickey lore? IDK, maybe the actor was mad (of course he is, he's the _Mad_ Doctor) okay, maybe he got _angry_ that he was never a popular character, and he only got to appear once. So he went postal?
@@Wendy_O._Koopa
So like, when the characters were forgotton, were they fired, kicked to the street, and then fired from a canon into a basement into a portal or something that had them end up in that abandoned land of Disney IPs Epic Mickey takes place in?
Because like, how did that end up happening then anyway, LOL.
@@_-Lx-_ I mean, that is kind of the entire premise of the sub-franchise. "Where did all those forgotten characters go?" They went here, where the game takes place. I guess it didn't explore the "how" part very well though, did it?
@@Wendy_O._Koopa
Yeah, there was really no explanation, but if it follows the idea of the whole shorts prior being characters being actors it'a even motr confusing how they would end up there.
Though I guess it could easily be explained via saying Epic Mickey is also a show or such the fictional "actors" worked on, with a reuinon of everyone.
Though all the kinda "lore/canon" to justify this just sounds like a copout anwser, easier to say it just really doesn't matter and they do whatever they feel like for each entry being flexible,
Hell, even series with more of an established history/mythos such as Zelda say that the timeline is just a looser idea and flexible to whatever they feel like doing, yet alone cartoon logic series like Mickey that have each entry in a vaccumn,
so I don't think anyone is taking Mickey lore seriously anyway, this is all incredibly funny goofy (hyuck) ideas and questions to think about though.
Also yeah, they really did zero explaining of how Epic Mickey even really happened or those characters were discarded,
I know it was mainly just a concept for very weird cool experimental dark fantasy take on Disney, but is weird they didn't even attempt to explain those things considering it was aiming for a more serious story in ways.
Does showcase how the game is incredibly flawed despite it's bold artistic vision.
1:18 mouse avi?
Damn the animation on these were so great I would love to see someone actually make a horror movie just in Black and white cartoons Like make cartoons slashers body horror Torture porn Supernatural horror Just in black and white cartoons With their own original characters I think that would be so cool Using stop motion pictures Perfect designs so much more
100 years ago - rated G. But now it's R!
wild af. not surprised that this episode is in public domain (although pluto appears whos still in copyright so i guess this short is partially public domain)
Is this movie public domain?
Disney didn’t renew the copyright as required. So, yes it is.
However, aspects of the short such as Pluto remain under copyright until 2026
Now wish on the mad doctors character mickey, pluto, skeleton, chicken, mad doctor, cuckoo skeleton, spider skeleton on disney animation 100
Great
I’m actually a big Mickey fan I got a couple plushies. Mostly the 1930 versions.
Ah it’s one of those “when I woke up, it was all a dream”
But the mad scientist doesn’t look anything like The Terrible Blot when decloaked. Iirc TTB looked like a caricature of Walt himself, as a joke by Floyd Gotfredson. Still, this must be the first inkling towards that figure.
Adult who watched this
👇
I’d rather have a horror movie based off this rather than steamboat willie
Its public domain!!!
The short’s already public domain as Disney didn’t renew the copyright as required at the time. However, aspects of the short remain under copyright until 2029
We can use Pluto?
I don’t think so, the copyright was never renewed and just because Pluto appears in it I don’t think that makes him public domain yet
He’ll be public domain in 2026
No suban estos cortos o Disney los demandará hablo de los que no están en dominio público
Sorry pal, this version of Mickey with the white gloves is actually not in the public domain
im pretty sure that mickey with the gloves AND the coloured outfit is in the public domain, considering his gloves showed up in the title card for steamboat willie and mickey was advertised at the time in his red shorts and yellow gloves
False, this cartoon indeed isn’t part of the public domain but the reply above me is right
EDIT: TURNS OUT THIS SHORT ACTUALLY IS PUBLIC DOMAIN BECAUSE THEY FORGOT TO RENEW IT
“This short is in the public domain, because Disney did not renew the copyright as was required at the time. However, elements of the short, including Pluto and aspects of Mickey's design, remain under copyright until 2029 at the latest.”
Wasnt this like banned or some shit and disney never renewed it
Disney decided to nix this short from their catalogue due to the dark horror themes, and as such neglected to or opted not to renew copyright.
However, the way Mickey is depicted in this short, the general design characteristics and appearance of Mickey and Pluto remain protected under copyright
@@abyssalplanes yeah it's Mickey and Pluto I'm afraid will get this guy a copyright strike, not the short itself
PD in 2029!!!!
Copyright wasn't renewed cause it was banned
Check this one
This Will Be Public Domain In 2028
Actually, it is already in public domain. They banned this cartoon world-wide so Disney never renewed the copyright. Making it public domain
@@Simpfok Oh
@@SimpfokIt was never banned, funnily enough it seems like Disney just straight up forgot to renew the copyright for this one
@@salamander5219 Oh, mb
This is still copyrighted until 2029 (?)
The copyright was not renewed
You can't copyright nothing If it's not changed or edited It still keeps the same elements that Walt Disney created I remember watching this movie when I was a kid Still hilarious as ever
apparently the movie is public domain as Disney didn't renew the copyright, as they decided to nix this from the Mickey catalogue due to the dark theming. unlike Steamboat Willie, the character designs in this movie are still protected until 95 years have passed since the movie was originally published