Amelia Earhart Mystery May Have New Clue In Never-Before-Seen Photo | TODAY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- A team of investigators from History Channel has uncovered a never-before-seen photo that they believe shows aviator Amelia Earhart and her navigator alive in Japanese custody after surviving a crash landing in the Pacific 80 years ago. NBC’s Tom Costello reports for TODAY.
» Subscribe to TODAY: on.today.com/Su...
» Watch the latest from TODAY: bit.ly/LatestTODAY
About: TODAY brings you the latest headlines and expert tips on money, health and parenting. We wake up every morning to give you and your family all you need to start your day. If it matters to you, it matters to us. We are in the people business. Subscribe to our channel for exclusive TODAY archival footage & our original web series.
Connect with TODAY Online!
Visit TODAY's Website: on.today.com/Re...
Find TODAY on Facebook: on.today.com/Li...
Follow TODAY on Twitter: on.today.com/Fo...
Follow TODAY on Google+: on.today.com/Pl...
Follow TODAY on Instagram: on.today.com/In...
Follow TODAY on Pinterest: on.today.com/Pi...
Amelia Earhart Mystery May Have New Clue In Never-Before-Seen Photo | TODAY
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
Amelia’s plane lost fuel crashed into the water. They drowned and were eaten by fish. The plane is now being used as a home for a school of fish. Also that photo was taken 2 years before their disappearance.
MaximaL_SchnappS :-: Humans cant be eaten by normal reed dwellers nor can they eat a aluminum plane.
The Flat Earther Hunter sharks are fish though
MaximaL_SchnappS :-: Sharks are fishes yes sorry.
No !!!!
Another brainwashed American: YOU.
According to Wikipedia: "Japanese blogger Kota Yamano found the original source of the photograph in the Archives in the National Diet Library Digital Collection. The original source of the photo was a Japanese travel guide published in October 1935, implying that the photograph was taken in 1935 or before, and thus would be unrelated to Earhart and Noonan's 1937 disappearance"
YES!! The photo was a co incidental likeness of the two fliers, taken 2 years before Earhart's flight. Gardner Island has too much evidence to not be the sight where she landed. A heel from a shoe, a shoe of the type and brand she wore, the cosmetic jar, the pen knife, Noonan's sextant box, a piece of aluminum that was like what was on the plane and the SOS heard in Florida from Earhart that mentioned the "Norchester City", a ship that was wrecked at Gardner Island. Her radio signal gave off harmonic radio waves that bounced off the ionosphere, and down to Florida. The girl who heard Amelia said she knew it was her voice, and that of a man who went crazy and was trying to take the microphone away from Earhart, the girl wrote down everything Earhart said. Navy pilots said they saw signs of habitation on Gardner island, without realizing there had been no inhabitants there for many years. Most researchers believe Gardner island was where she ended up.
Whatever the outcome we need to worry how we are going to end up. Many bigger mysteries exist
The photo is from ONE book in the Japanese Government archives. There are not hundreds of these books or thousands, there is just one of these books. It is not bound together like a normal book with the publishing date, it is a book with medal prongs that can easily be taken apart with a page added to it with the photo. How do they say it is from 1935? There is an ink stamp in the back of the book, like a librarians stamp that says 1935. Easy to fake this. The Marshall Island government said the dock they are standing on wasn't built until 1936 so the photo can't be from 1935. Many eye witnesses place them on Jaluit Island and then on Saipan. No eye witnesses place her and Noonan on Gardner Island.
this photo has amelia, the navigator, and the plane? that sounds way too good to be true. if it is real it would be a miracle find
I have to agree, but its reaching to say in the least. Its all circumstantial.
Xian the photograph has been misinterpreted. It can not be Earhart. It was taken 10 years too early.
gavin Reid -- wrong. Even the Japanese source said the photo was taken in 1935.
HARDLY 10 years too early. Earhart went missing in the 1937.
Two, three years difference? It still raises the question. WHY was what appears to be an earlier generation copy (if not the original copy of the photo) in the US ONI files?
The question now is is the Japanese blogger source reliable. HE has to be checked out, too.
If you're going to call the conclusions of the program into question, make sure the guy raising the flag is also honest, too.
It's not as if Japan doesn't have reasons to hide the facts of its pre-World War II activities, too, right?
If you understood what Japan did in the Marshalls prior the outbreak of war with the US, then you'd understand why they have to be questioned. They HID a lot during that period... They also DIDN'T allow the US Navy to search the Marshalls for any possible traces of Earhart because they were establishing a military presence in the area. They were building bases and fortifications illegally in the area.
thanks gavin i just heard about that. i knew it couldnt be
gavin Reid 4 years. Published in a book 1935.
im 54
and i remember this coming out in the 70s. japan denied everything. they had a show on tv about this with interviews with natives talking about the execution of blonde pilot and 2 men. now there are pictures.
maybe same situation as pilot gary powers shot down spying over Russia
Times are repeating 2017 is the new 70s
Japan will NEVER admit anything they did anything wrong in World War II.
It's not their policy, it's not what they teach in their history books.
Individual Japanese historians, soldiers, and a few politicians have been honest about the Imperial Government and military activities before and during World War II but the general Japanese government line is that they were victims in World War II. It infuriates everybody else in the region when the documentation so obviously shows otherwise. If that weren't enough, you have thousands of survivors -- POWs, civilians, comfort women, etc. -- who are still alive to testify to the fact.
I have no doubt the Japanese Navy could have captured Earhart and Noonan.
There are things about this story that are screwball from the American end: who funded the trip, the government support along the way, the airstrip on Howland Island that was basically unuseable, and scenarios suggesting that the final radio communiques were either a comedy of errors (failure to share radio wavelengths for direct communications in the final stretch) OR scripted to throw off anybody who wasn't in the know about a secret mission.
I think the analogy to Gary Powers is closer to the truth than the official US government line.
If something (this photo) FINALLY leaked out that demonstrates the storyline that she ended up in Saipan (in captivity) is the actual history, great. If not, well then it doesn't depend on just photo. There are too many people who saw events independently of each other that have corroborating stories. In addition, we have leaked documents from the FDR administration and later reports that clearly support the Saipan scenario more than this crash-and-sink business or the TIGHAR castaway movie script.
It's been 80 years... It's about darn time the reality of the case gets disclosed.
AvengerII no one has ever said it better than you. thank you
I love the way you put your point across. We can't only blame the Japanese. The photo was found in the US archives so somebody in US knew about Amelia Earhart. I just hope that both the governments put their ego aside and get the truth out.
Japan has some explaining to do.
Qwen R
All those involved are dead.
How do you know? Do tell?
Rather, Discovery should have done their homework. Thanks to a blogger bothering to do an archive search, now we know the documentary makers made waaay too many conclusions from a photo they didn't bother to trace to its original publication - which was in 1935...
Qwen R I think the producers of this show has some explaining to do.
That picture has to be double-checked.
There's leaping to conclusions it from both angles.
Rush to say it's Earhart, rush to say it's illegitimate or mistaken context ( => likely mistaken context).
I'd like to see someone else confirm the Japanese source for the dispute.
It's not as if Japan wouldn't want to refute the story that its 1930s military kidnapped and was ultimately responsible for the death of an American icon, right?
Seriously, it has to be double-checked.
Oh, and FYI -- the Japanese didn't let the US military search the Marshall Islands in 1937... Probably because they were building bases and establishing a military presence in the area. On top of which they US Navy didn't want the IJN to know the Japanese security codes had already been broken.
The release of the blogger based in Japan is a bit too convenient, too.
There was a reason that photo was in the National Archives... Maybe they were mistaken in the late 1930s (about the context) but I find it interesting they appear to have a more primary resource. The picture in the Japanese blog is at least a second or third generation copy of the photo. Notice it's "dotty" and blurrier than the B & W glossy copy the investigators got a ahold of. WHY is the primary photo (or closer to it) in the US National Archves?!?
It's amazing people are missing that point (on top of the fact the Japanese source has to be double-checked, too)!
currently living here in marshall islands. this is freakingly cool.
maeson R omg
yeah, oh really...she'd be over 120 years old. ;)
maeson R have you met anyone their that can confirm she died in Saipan or that school taught the kids about her being captured
@@deepseadirt1 ĺ
I’m late ash are you still living there? That dope
I love mysteries....
"I don't know why they call it "Hamburger-Helper"....it's goo-oood all by itself!"
"How do you want your bun? Light or dark?"
RealTomato Ketchup,Eddie? She'll be fine on the roof. It's not like it's going to rain or anything.
Unknown Hacker the woman's got jet black hair did she dye her hair on the island and all those ships they're old Merchant ships maybe she came on one of them to visit this is stupid.
Unknown Hacker Same
I watched a documentary on Disney the other day on this, it seems the most accepted theory is that she crashed on an extremely remote island and perished there. They think her plane crashed in shallow water then the tide carried it further out whir destroying the aircraft either further. I honestly don’t think Japan had anything to do with it. And this photo honestly is rather irrelevant when you all is considered
Plus the photo was taken 2 years before she and her partner went missing
I saw this photo a long time ago. It was determined then that the woman on the dock is not Earhart.
No she ran out of gas and crashed near Howland island, where she was supposed to land. No gas to go any further, and Noonan isn't planning on flying anywhere else. Why fly hundred's of miles away when there is a coast guard cutter that can search for you as long as you stay as close to the intended island as you can.
The problem is the photo is not from 1937, it's from 1935
wow that DOES make you think, for sure....
Pat Lepikko it really does man
There's a theory saying she crashed on an island of coconut crabs and was eaten alive which is why we can't find her.
No way. Those crabs would have been eaten. She probably died and then the franz might have done away with the body.
We all know she is alive and well and living in the Delta Quadrant discovered and rescued from Stasis from the crew of Voyager and Captain Janeway
Omg! The 37's was such a great episode!
❤❤❤❤❤❤
She could be alive at 110 years old. People have loved to 129.
Real news, not like the usual good job.
Grant Hill it is real because it fits your narrative right. Just like the man in the white house claimed that every american would be insured, LIE. Secondly Mexico would pay for a wall, LIE. smdh, ignorance is bliss. Fake news until it is something you agree with? Facts are Facts like hey guess what Chrisopther Columbus didn't discover America it was already inhabited, how can you discover an inhabitated land? Besides the Vikings came here before Christopher Genocide Columbus. FACTS, look it up
Now that we know that this news was about as real as anything out of Trump's mouth, will you think about why you're so easily duped?
Report has already been discredited. But lets see how it plays out.
so when is news fake? when reporters don't do any real research on their own and parrot another so called reliable news! source.
Real news has been reported consistently on every news source but Fox.
Brings back memories of “Unsolved Mysteries”. The music used to freak me out!
But yes I do feel that she was shot down and died in some pow camp
OMG I WATCHED THAT TOO
"leaves no doubt..." no doubt means we know for sure. How do we know "for sure" looking at this picture. GTFO of here.
nepatriots77 😂
Do some research this photo was taken years before she disappeared
HOW DO YOU KNOW????
No
Too bad that photo was taken in 1935 and she was lost back in 1937 😐
Somebody had to tell them 😁
If you'll notice the woman they claim is Amelia, the hair is too dark. Amelia's was lighter.
@@JaneDoe-si7ht it's a black and white photo bro
@@siahmackay9083 There's lots of photos of Amelia in black and white. Her hair isn't that dark in any of them. Even in photos on this video.
@@siahmackay9083 Not a "bro".
American humbug from "A team of investigators from History Channel". The photo was published in a Japanese tourist magazine in 1935. Two year before Amelia plunged into the Pacific ...
Just reminded how much I do NOT miss Matt Lauer!
there isnt enough detail in that photo to tell weather the people are Caucasian much less who they are.
Kevin Okey The photo is only one of several taken,it and others were sufficient confirmation that AE and FW were there..ONI had confirmed their capture via intercepting radio messages..US had few spies in area and this was best they could do under circumstances with 1930s tech..Supposedly person who took photo was also executed as a spy..AE and FW arent seen being guarded as Japanese were initially courteous things changed after arrival in Saipan..wait for files to be released in 2037
Big dog They were on an island. Where were they going to go?
Right you are.
whether.
i would love it to be true... but the "male caucasian" doesn't look white at all?? if theyre reaching on that then kinda ruins the whole story
Listeners on Howland Island heard Earhart's voice on the radio. It was a strong signal. Her plane got near Howland.
Photo found to be in book published in 1935. See article here:
www.google.com/amp/s/relay.nationalgeographic.com/proxy/distribution/public/amp/2017/07/amelia-earhart-lost-photograph-discredited-spd
Interesting how all these "experts" can convince people and as it turns out the photo was taken two years before the flight in 1935.
and how would u know that
How do you know that?
Robert Lockwood No the photo us one of several,not very good but sufficient proof for ONI that she WAS there..ONI gad intercepred radio messages that seemed to confirm her capture..this was additional proof for them..Claims that tge photo was previously published are a debunking effort,US us still sticking to cover story of ocean crash landing ..whole matter very embarrassing to US government..wait til 2037 when files including other photos should be released
@JebaydenSmith The pier wasn't built in 1935, the photo that the book came from was from a later edition.
How do we know that files released in 2037will be complete,altered,accurate or falsified.?Who is in charge of these files now?Where are they and who is protecting them?What does anyone know about them?Just asking
Too bad this is a photo published in book in Japan in 1935, two years before Amelia and Fred went missing on July 2, 1937. 😳😔🤪
Have You done the re-search yourself or are you just another brainwashed American.
military don't want you to know, would you believe if they say the photo is published 2 years before?
If it was them, then why aren't they being guarded by the Japanese? They are just sitting and standing there like the other folk on the dock.
Ylva Bjarnson Because on the beginning the Japanese were quite courteous..things changed after arrival at Saipan
besides, theyre on an island, where they gonna go?
good point
The result of this "revelation" is that a guy in Japan saw it and remembered having seen it before in a Japanese travel book published two years BEFORE the fatal flight. This hype has been thoroughly and decisively debunked as wishful thinking for conspiracy theorists.
No, that picture was from 1935 tour brochure.Totally debunked.
Just a question..... would a pair of “prisoners” especially ones deemed to be spys be allowed to casually sit on the edge of a dock pier? Un guarded and with no visible restraints? They would surely be chained/ cuffed and be under strict armed guard observation? Looks to much like a tourists holiday photo to me? Interesting though! Best wishes all
This photo was found in a Japanese publication out in 1935, two years before she disappeared. This is not Earhat & Noonan.
Its convenient that files are always missing with these stories, did a dog eat them or something.
Mr Banana the papers accidentally walked themselves to a shredder
Shawn Sheehan Wait til 2037 files should be released then..
Ask the Japanese?? Someone somewhere knows something- maybe info has been past down through the decades !!!
Photo already proven not to be Amelia and Fred...But, I still think that they met their demise at the hands of the Japanese.
Yes except this photo was published in a book 2 years before her disappearance ....
What book?
No not true
big dog how do you know😂
The book was Japanese and bound Loose using string the way the Japanese bound books. Any page in a Japanese book like that can be added or removed at any time. The picture doesn't have a date only the cover of the book. I have investigated this extensively and it looks authentic to me.
"I believe it proves" and "I think it leaves no doubt"
Thinking and believing are not proof.
It's not right the photo was taken two years before she got in that plane
4°41'28"s-174°29'39"w zoom in on these coordinates
.
I Worked With Amelia's Sister, Muriel...Too Bad This Information Didn't Come Out Before Muriel Passed Away...!!!! We Had Many Discussions And Theories About What Happened To Amelia...!!!! It Broke Her Heart Not To Know What Actually Happened...!!!! 😢 Hopefully, They Are Together Now Up There...!!!! 💔💔
Too bad they have discovered the photo was in a book published in 1935. This is completely bogus.
You sir are correct.
Esteban Morales couldn’t agree more.
Really? What book?
It was photos held together with string. This photo was added later.
The photo was not her, and taken and in a book before she even left... Talk about fakenews.
157-337 (LOP) was one of the last things Amelia said over the radio, there are two 157-337 (compass and true heading) which one was she referring to? There are also two 67 degrees ( compass and true heading) and both are located north of Howland Island, 67 degrees true heading (sunrise) is 11 degrees north of Howland and 67 degree compass heading (76.54 degree true heading) is approximately 1.5 degrees north of Howland. So which 67 degrees is the 157-337 LOP based on?
This is so sad how her life ended all alone with no one knowing the truth !!! Only god knows now!!!! Rip Amelia gone to soon and so suddenly!!!
Cyndi Gomez shhhh
I seen this when it first came out 3 years ago.
Nice
Haha
the problem with this is the photo was previously published in 1935 two years before Earhart went missing
This photo was taken in 1935 which was two years before Amelia's dissapearence
where's your proof?
She took off from Lae, Papua New Guinea enroute to Howland island, an uninhabited island between Australia and Hawaii
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
"Experts" using gray blobs and arbitrary lines on a computer:
"Look at all this proof!!"
if you squint real hard you can see oswald
Some one know something
The photo is very non-conclusive. There is no actual chain of custody for it, nor is the actual source verified. There is no way to verify when it was taken. It could have been an earlier photo, or even photo-shopped. Saipan is almost 1000 miles from where the plane most likely went down, near Nikumaroro Island. The Japanese had no military presence near Nikumaroro in 1937. Even Rabaul was not built until 1942. There would've been no reason to take Earhart and Noonan prisoner, nor for them to 'spying' on basically nothing. And if Japan was trying to be low key, they certainly would not have taken them almost 1000 miles away to their most significant presence in that part of the Pacific at the time, and not say anything, make demands for an apology, or other political purpose, during a time of already strained relationships between the US and Japan. Someone as famous as Earhart would have been a political goldmine for the Japanese as a prisoner.
Other things to note is that the ship in the picture is not a Japanese naval vessel, but simply a cargo ship that would've been common anywhere in the Pacific at that time. The 'plane' the ship has supposedly hanging from the stern does not even look like it belongs in the picture. It has a different focus ad coloration palette. ANd it looks nothing like an Electra (no twin tail, or other identifiable features.), It could be a lens flare, or even added after the fact. There is also an object on the side of the ship that appears to be a watermark of some kind, and very similar in color and focus to the object in the rear. There are no identifiable numbers on the ship, nor does it appear to be flying a flag showing it's nationality. It could be any cargo ship, from any time in the 1930s, from anywhere. Another thing to note is that there are no Japanese guards in the picture, nor anyone with any kind of firearm or weapon. In fact, no military people, or even Japanese civilians appear to be in the picture. Does it make sense that the Japanese would take them, prisoner, then allow them to wander about on a pier with no guards, no restraints, nothing? If the two people in question are in fact Earhart and Noonan, they do not appear to be under any duress, and actually, seem to be just relaxing. The photo was probably taken in New Guinea before they started the next, and last leg of the journey, if it is them at all.
A more logical explanation is that the photo is of something entirely different., There is very strong evidence that this exact photo was, in fact, published in a Japanese Travel Guide two years earlier. It appears on page 113 of the guide, "The life line of the sea My figure of the South Sea: South Sea archipelago photo book", which was published on Oct 10, 1935, in Palau.
It is likely that the actual details of Earhart's and Noonan's disappearance will remain a mystery forever.
The photo is from a Japanese book published in 1935, two years before Earhart even went missing.
What book?
How do you know??
TehSpirit buzzfeed
Why do people post comments like this and never answer questions? What book?
SPCLPONY THERES A BUZZFEED EPISODE
thephotograph was taken at Jaluit Atoll in 1935 and published as part of the 111-page travelogue in 1936, how can ths photo of 1935 be evidence when Amelia's flight around the world did not start till 1937
I believe this! The Japanese were suspicious of her! They thought she was a spy! That was her second flight! My grandpa was related to Amelia Earhart! My grandmother knew about her, even before she became famous aviator. She knew that Amelia Earhart, wanted to become a pilot. Gone but ,not forgotten! The legacy lives on!
Minnie Earhart Yes she was blackmailed into spying,and got caught..this accidental flyover trick has been used before and since,such as KAL 007,over the USSR,and MH17 over Ukraine..
That's crazy , I really believe this is true ! The Japanese got her thinking she's a spy just like the people who had the top secret picture said , "she was a spy don't talk about it"
That photo was from a Japanese tourist catalog from 1935. Long before her flight.
Wrong. That was disproven
This picture appeared in a book in 1935, 2 years before Earhart's flight. Obviously it's not Earhart.
whats the name of the book?
Sure, right, uh-huh. What book? You can’t just make a statement like that without backing it up. So, we discount your comment as totally false and without merit.
@@CogentConsult read the news about it. The book was published in 1935. This is old news that was discovered to be bogus.
What book?
@@brianmachado4533 all you have to do is Google.
www.google.com/amp/s/relay.nationalgeographic.com/proxy/distribution/public/amp/2017/07/amelia-earhart-lost-photograph-discredited-spd
I read somewhere this photograph was taken before we were at war with Japan
Chris Watters: Yes....its from a "travel guidebook" published in 1935.
That photo was published in a Japanese magazine two years before Earhardt went missing, so it couldn't be her.
She was killed because she found out the truth about FLAT EARTH 💯
No surprise, History Channel got it WRONG. This is a 1935 photo from a Japanese travel book.
In the mean time, IT is clear, that this same picture was made 1935. Earhart disappeared in 1937.
On that picture cannot be Earhart! She did her trip years later.
Can't believe this is still airing. This is 100% false. The picture was taken in 1935, Amelia went missing in 1937.
Wow! Interesting !I'd like to know what really happened to her, she was related to my grandfather George Earhart he was from Kansas City! I remember my grandmother n my mother always speaking to me about Amelia wanting to become a pilot, I didn't really know who she was but my mom always said, grandmother told her , we 're related to Amelia Earhart, I had an aunt nicknamed Tootsie looked alot like Amelia Eahart! Grandpa's grandparents were from Bravia Germany emigrated to Kansas, the German last name was erhardt later changed to Earhart.
wow
A document that was misfiled and found in the US Archives addressed to FDR stated that Earhart was “probably” being held in Saipan. The US military had broken the Japanese naval code and they didn’t want to let the Japanese military know this as war with Japan was imminent. So the US turned their back on her and Noonan and they were executed in Saipan as US spies. Several US military serviceman saw her plane in a hangar and were ordered to destroy it. One service member stated that he found her flying jacket and her flight logs in her bag in a safe at the hangar where her plane hidden.
This is for Japan. If Japan had anything to do with Amelia's and Fred's deaths please tell the truth and end this decades old mystery and return their remains to their homeland.
those photos are so murky you can't see anything. You can't make a positive identification based on this kind of conjecture. I remember Ric Gillespie's first or second trip to the island, Nikki... in 1991, it was on DiscoveryChannel back then hosted by Lindsay Wagner(Bionic woman), and they found a supposed shoe heel. It was thrilling at the time and fingers were crossed that the mystery was solved. I kind of don't believe him anymore either. He said radio messages were heard from Earhart, indicating she had landed and the plane was intact in order to run the motors which provided power to the plane's radio. It's been said the radio messages were later proven fake(short wave radio guys fooling around) and yet if she survived long enough to keep sending radio messages why didn't the search planes see her when they criss crossed the island several times? no plane, no people. Gillespie says she landed on Nikki - whatever and that the plane was washed out to sea. Well if she landed on shore good enough to run the engines why didn't she taxi the plane closer into the brush where the surf couldn't pull it out. Its all bunk. The only one who knows where Amelia is or her fate is : DAVY JONES.
TIGHAR currently has the best leads on the Earhardt mystery. It looks like she ditched on an atoll off Nikumauroro Island and died there as a castaway.
Stalicone: Yes....and radio transmissions from her were picked up for days after she disappeared. She wasn't sure where they were but she said they were on a reef near the wreck of a ship called Norwich City (which was wrecked at Nikumauroro Island, previously known as Gardner island).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Norwich_City
I'm watching the History channel doc right now. Everyone involved did great work. My parents made sure we knew all about the Earhart story growing up. And my Dad was always one to look past what the govt presented on the surface. I remember him always saying he never believed the official story. Over the years I've come to trust the villagers. I believe the US govt & military have known all along what happened to them & just left them to their fates. Knowing their reasoning doesn't make me feel any better about it. So much dirty underhanded shameless crap under the guise of national security. Lies on top of lies on top of more lies...I wish I didn't care so much.
All this disingenuousness in our society can be summed up with the latest media phrase "nothing to see here"!
Why was it pulled from the History Channel?
@@sh1701-A Bit of a head scratcher for sure. I just wonder who in 1935 would produce a "tourist brochure" for an obscure South Pacific island? And furhermore, why was this "brochure" on file in the National Archives?
@@nelsonphilip4520 Did the Federal Government pay the guy to say that the photo was taken in 1935? The plane on the barge sure looks like the Electra but, if you notice they don't show the barge as much as possible. Someone is lying.
@@sh1701-A ther reason they dont show the barge is because they are focusing on the people
There is a video where a young girl who would sit in front of her radio with pad and pen (ready to write down songs she liked) that heard Amelia making a plea for help. That Noonan was hurt badly. She wrote down word for word what she heard coming from her radio. Noonan was out of his mind trying to grab the radio from her. An expert stated that it was possible with technical reasons why. So how could she be making a may day call hurt and then be sitting on a dock healthy?
You raise a good question. I think these investigators make a "good guess" or reasonable hypothesis as to the identity of the individuals in the photograph. If it's not Earhart & Noonan,
who else could it be?
Best change those history books!
Not so fast. Chances are it isn't her.
What chances? How many white "woman flyers" wearing pants were in that area around that time? Probably one.
Brandon Simmons the seated figure looks too much like others in the picture. is it even a woman?
Debunked, picture was taken in 1935 from a Japanese tourist guide
THE PHOTO WAS TAKEN 2 YEARS BEFORE HER AND FRED WENT MISSING GOSH PEOPLE SEE THINGS AND JUST GO WITH IT DO UR RESEARCH FIRST PLS
I do believe Amelia was capture by the Japanese .they Are responsable for these incident
pfff, photo was proven to be from 1935
what book?
[D]arth No that was a debunking effort..photo is one of several..US is still sticking to cover story of ocean crashlanding. wait til 2037 when files released
It's a photo album held together with string. Jabor dock was built in 1936. There is no copyright saying 1935. The only thing that says 1935 is a librarian's stamp.
This isn't new information. I saw a documentary where they showed this photo more than a year ago.
I still believe she was captured by the Japanese but this photo was taken 2 years before she disappeared
debunked, that pic was found in a book published 6 years before she disappeared.
unfortunately this photograph has already been shown to have been taken around ten years too early for it to be Earhart. It existed in a japanese archive.
Sure the 170 pages were destroyed. Where are they what happened to them. A coverup
Very interesting facts,and this was they way the Japanese were in those days,why not give her family and friends closure if she was killed by them.If it is from an earlier date then it is a bad hoax for her lovedones.
Yeah, that photo was taken two years before she went missing. It has been shown to be true.
Doubtful it's her. I also noticed the photo analysis was done by Kent Gibson, the same man who claimed to identify Billy the Kid in the alleged croquet photo. Since the Billy the Kid photo has been thoroughly discredited, I'd take any claim Gibson makes with a huge grain of salt.
"It leaves no doubt to the world that this is amelia erhard"
Oh yes it does. On old B&W pic of someones back???
On top of that, this photo was known already in the 70s
Well if they positively ID'ed the man she was with then that has to be Amelia Earhart
This is old news that's already been debunked soon after this program!
PHOTO WAS LATER PROVEN TO HAVE BEEN TAKEN IN 1935, TWO YEARS PRIOR TO HER DISAPPEARANCE.
She landed in Milly Atoll and was taken to Saipan along with Noonan and the Electra,she was shot to dead before the USA army took over Saipan
How do you know?
@@emmanuelsilvera8032 I lived there before
That’s a photo that predates the loss of Earhart by a few years. This is nonsense.
The foto was officiële taken 3 years before she went missing!!!
The never before photo that was seen by everyone and taken in 1935?
Utter NONSENSE! that photo is from 1935!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Japan has taken so much from the world and given so little, not everyone can forgive the Japanese for the crimes of the second world war...
and we wonder why people fall for fake news?
I would love to hear more about her. How old was she
Gail Jackson-Chapman: She was born in July 1897 so when she disappeared she would have been almost 40 years old.
@@paganphil100 thank for the information❤️
She was spying!!
She died on Saipan in 1944 executed by the Japanese.
The picture of them on the doc was debunked to have been taken 2 before the trip
Great story. Pity someone found a book with that photo in taken 2 years before they disappeared!
Awesome amazing beautiful people amazing beautiful places ❤
The Japanese photo debunker was debunked himself; The Republic of the Marshall Islands issued a release on July 15, 2017 stating the dock at Jabor was not built until 1936...of course this was not reported by the MSM. Also the "book" was not actually a bound book, it was a loose leaf binder which could be added to/subtracted from at any time.
Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan have found the twilight zone.
History Channel Knew the photo was BS !
This didn't age well.