I always annoys me whenever people try to use charity as a solution to widespread problems, regardless of political position. Charities have never worked as the primary solution of societal problems and can never work, for the same reason government fails - it's a centralized solution that does not take into account the complexities of the economy. One such example are shoe manufacturers with a selling point that they donate a pair of shoes to african countries for each pair bought. Result: many shoe businesses went bankrupt because too many people stopped buying shoes.
She didn't argue properly here but Stossel's argument was logically flawed. An immoral action has to be illegal, and if it is the law will take it seriously enough to enforce it. Calling compassionate people "cruel" cause their bans lead to cruel people continuing to be cruel doesn't make sense. Rights groups aren't responsible for the actions of poachers and can't control how they act any more than enacting legislation against them. When animal hunting is outlawed, it will objectively make an impact by bringing legal attention to it and thus stopping the perpetrators. Stossel's logic is like saying we should make child trafficking legal cause people will be more motivated to do it if it's illegal.
They care more about "feeling" good than actually doing good the free market can solve a lot of they issues they are fighting , but them being lefties who think the market is evil , makes it impossible to actually solve anything
and get's adored, praised, loved AND gets 'Hero' status, hero worship AND 'virgin mary' glorious holy virtuous 'saint' status. She and all like her will kill 1000 Rhinos (they do) to keep that going for as long as they live.
It's like Doctors don't really want a cure for Cancer because it will take away their money for the treatments. There are many cures for Cancer. But they don't want people to know about them.
@@lorishiversdogmom You are one million percent true!!!!!! And research is almost as big of an industry as the treatment and care industry that is making a lot of people rich!!!!!!! They don't want a cure!!!!
@@elenabob4953 excellent comment that will also apply to many other activists and their self-promoting politicized objectives ! Your comment should be pinned !
This is critical. She has waaaay too much invested to admit that she might be wrong. Even she said it: “it takes time for that trickle down to occur”. She won’t be convinced of something like that overnight.
The thought never crossed her mind. She said they were making progress. The Dont Do Drugs campaign got alot of views as well and it had no affect on the demand. How can you claim that views alone are working when poaching is increasing.
Of course she’s against it, she would lose her job if she wasn’t. There wouldn’t be a need for her “nonprofit” as they’re racking 6 figures. These type of conservationists are jokesters.
Just please, when taking action against them, such as by voting, please think also on how to replace them. Because someone should be addressing this...
She's getting a profit/salary!!!! She's like the Dem politician or Professor pushing socialism/quasi communism: they're collecting a paycheck/money for pushing utter bullshit nonsense and they don't see the hypocrisy!!!
Environmental groups "can't see it" as he said....because their income is derived from the fight against it. They won't do the right thing because it affects their bank account. So, marginalize them and move on.
Number one, you can't use reason on the liberal mind, they are driven solely by emotion, please stop. Number two....there is no number two, they are retarded and evil and that's pretty much where we are.
Of course she jumps to extremes saying "are we going to farm every animal out there to satisfy our sick bloodlust" and my man Stossel comes back with "YEAH If it saves and protects the animals!"
*Activists* - _"we need to save these animals from extinction."_ *people* - _"we are by useing proper conservation practices like rhino farms and imitation horns"_ *Activists* - _"no, not like that!"_ *people* - 🤦
As an amateur conservationist, I was ecstatic once I heard that they successfully, artificially recreated rhino horn and can produce it through 3-D printing. I still am hopeful that it can save the lives of humans and rhinos alike.
@@savagetruthercritic8646 he kept his mouth shut and nose clean until his libertarian worldview matured within him. I did the same with voting, never voting until I knew what I believed in; I heartily recommend the same to other's, in particular the young.
@@savagetruthercritic8646 \ Hes older\established before the huge take over. You will notice no young actors will dare come out like this because it means no future career.
@@buddmcstudd6994 Isnt it nice that the current "stimulus" checks are sending over 128 million to teachers unions? Apparently the people come last. I guess its better then the millions sent to foreign lands for "gender studies".. However 10 million is being sent to the "preservation" of native American languages...whatever that is. Covid lockdowns are the biggest scam in recent American history if not in the top 5.
Its been proven, and bore out n the facts and numbers that, conservation groups r what help our species. Its crazy how strong some people feel about PETA and similar groups but don't really look at what they do or how many animals they euthanize. Or how many animals r saved by culling out some of them. Elephants as an example. If u charge $75,000 to hunt a bull elephant who can no longer breed and has become destructive but, then use that money to support the elephants that can better the population numbers. Not to mention all the animals some groups like PETA "save", then euthanize them. But people donate money to idiots that willingly choose to put gorilla glue n their hair only to find out that's a really dumb idea, or black lives matter that takes almost 100% of their donations and gives it to politicians instead of worthy causes so, I'm not shocked people support things that don't help or even hurt the end goal.
I was surprised he was very confrontational but still fairly respectful but it needed to be pretty tough cuz these people are nuts I used to be one of them kind of LOL
@@iamsearchingforthefiletmignon Emotions are already there from the beginning, because the arguments on the left are nothing but emotion. Reality itself is confrontational.
John's "Devil's Advocate" method of interviewing is brilliant. I have been watching John since his days as a local reporter in NYC. That was 50-60 years ago and he was great then and still is.
I really don't get this whole tell everyone what to do and how to live their lives! Get your own life, and leave US good hardworking American People the heck alone!
*Activists* - _"we need to save these animals from extinction."_ *people* - _"we are by useing proper conservation practices like rhino farms and imitation horns"_ *Activists* - _"no, not like that!"_ *people* - 🤦
Your god damned right. Push this fake meat bullshit, make cows the next 'kings deer', and watch as Mississippi river piracy and cattle rustling raises back from the history books.
She is a Kool-Aid drinker, so she will never be persuaded. Sure her cause is noble, but she has a one tracked mind, and her disdain for using any animal as a "commodity" is blinding her to other solutions that do not fit her dogma.
In 19th century New Orleans, there was an interesting saying about prostitution she should think about. "You can make it illegal, but you can't make it un-popular"
@@KandiKlover Honestly, it is better, Alcohol and tobacco havee some strict regulations on em and those work better than any ban ever would, i would prefer softer regulation or none of course, but between regulation and ban, i'll take regulation.
“When you’re talking about beer or wine or scotch there are no lives on the line.” Lady alcoholism is an enormous issue across the world and has major impacts on families.
The American alligator was an endangered species until alligator farms were legalized to produce leather, as long as a certain percentage of their animals were released to the wild. The American alligator has made a huge comeback as a result.
Why can’t they do both. Sell fake horns to those that don’t follow her promotion and no horns sold to those that do? It’s a win win. Why can’t she see that?
Because her cushy, high paying job will be gone if they actually SAVE the rinos & then she will have to think of a new, even more stupid job that doesn’t actually help humans or animals!
Monotech2.0 What points would those be? Farming rhinos reduces poaching, increase population size and will in effect save the species from extinction. That’s the goal of conservationists in general.
Every good action, no matter how noble, ultimately turns into extremism. We should be kind and protect animals whilst at the same time taking care not to demonise humans.
In general, that's how charities are. Most don't actually care about the unfortunate; they just want the donations to keep flowing in, so they can keep their cushy jobs and brag about how moral they are. For every good charity, there are a lot more bad ones. If poverty ended tomorrow, most of these "charities" would be out of a job, so what incentive do they actually have to fix the problem? None.
Exactly! Shes a cultural Karen that's going to teach the brown people that Rhino horns are bad. Her video was seen by alot of people yall. Of course poaching is still on the rise but she looks great in her eyes and she gets paid.
Jobs are like energy. They are neither created nor destroyed, just converted. They could join the new fake rhino horn manufacturing, or rhino farming industries. Or said jobs that would benefit from such, such as agriculture, plumbing, etc.
In 2017, I volunteered in a rhino sanctuary. This particular place takes care of orphan rhinos that are left behind by poachers. What they informed us was exactly what this video says. The best solution for poaching is the legalization of rhino horn trade. There were a bunch of rhino farmers ready to influx the market and also synthetic rhino horn is undetectable. Plus, it is possible to dehorn a rhino without hurting it as far as you don’t hit the nerve. Also, it will grow back (it’s made of keratin like your hair and nails). Anyways, the message ion this video is 100% correct. And that’s also what was spread to the volunteers in the sanctuary I went to assist.
Nearly two and a half thousand years ago a poet wrote better to keep your mouth zipped and let people think you're stupid, rather than open it and prove their point.
He really doesn't. He just makes insulting accusations that she doesn't properly argue against. Stossel is being nothing but insulting by claiming that rights advocates who enact bans are somehow "cruel" cause of the actions of poachers. It's not in their fault that poachers still choose to be cruel, the whole point of a hunting ban is to enable legal enforcement and intervention to stop animal murderers.
@@LordsofMedia Oh, that nails it. Exactly! The insanity of making something illegal merely to justify your career! Sounds like what Thomas Sowell went through when he worked at US Dept. of Labor after he suggested testing the "Minimum Wage" hypothesis. Their reaction cured him of Marxism.
@@pedropradacarciofi2517 Laws/rules go both ways. They allow for actions to take place or prohibit them. She is not advocating for a lawful society in places where hunting is allowed.
It's not her fault that poachers continue to be cruel despite a law being passed. She's doing the right thing by advocating the ban. You need to stop projecting the cruel deeds of poachers onto her.
Due to the context of the video I find your words interestingly phrased. I do agree. She’s fighting an un-winnable battle. John’s points clearly would make more of an immediate impact.
@@lamalien2276 This is not a "devil's advocate" attempt .... this is an attempt to enlighten this Organization that their tactics don't work, didn't work, and never will work. His examples are spot on ... it doesn't matter if the object is alive or inanimate, it's the same process. If we have to farm certain animals in order to save those in the wild .... so be it. The day we can stop intentionally cutting the horns off of the wild herd, is the day we have won this battle. Having to rob the wild rhinos of that which makes them rhinos, isn't very humane. The only saving grace is that rhinos can grow back their horns. These activist can't see beyond their own personal self serving feelings, which will get more rhinos killed. China has 1.4 billion people .... that's 1,400,000,000! If have a fraction of a fraction of that population wanting these horns, that will be the end of rhinos if we can't educate that fraction - or provide an alternative. That's the view from here.
"They just cant see it" OH THEY CAN SEE IT! That's the problem! They can absolutley see their bottom line evaporating and less donations coming their way.
The prohibition era was (arguably) the last time americans didnt comply with ridiculous or unjust laws. Think this scamdemic shows just how complacent folk have become
@@mfspectacular I mean the marijuana prohibition era too? I'm not sure where you're at but bars and restaurants around me largely stayed open for indoor dining despite the governor's orders.
No on both ends, as evident in immigration restrictions and drug prohibition just as much as gun control and restricting 'environmentally unfriendly' products
Someone came to my class 5 years ago to talk about rhino poaching. I asked him why they can't just sell all the horns themselves which would raise money to protect them, lower the price by a lot, and reduce the number of horns that poachers can steal
Stossel is the only one being hypocritical. He claims to care about rhinos but supports the idea of farming them for resources to be acceptable as long as it keeps their population alive, even if it kills several individuals. Masha is advocating for an anti hunting ban that will give legal enforcement against wannabe animal killers, there's nothing remotely illogical or hypocritical about that. I do wonder if you simply hold a negative impression of animal rights groups.
This reminds me of one of my family members; loves her animals more than people, but yet continues to feed the worst and the absolute cheapest food on the market to them. It's all about the cause of feeling self-righteous, and we see right through this narcissistic behavior.
Also cutting it that short will kill them. When you cut a nail short it hurts and sometimes bleeds. When it is of that size, it will make them bleed out. Shut up
@Solaris it mostly didn’t work. It did decrease mass shootings, although Columbine still happened. The biggest failures I always see with mass shootings is people with guns letting the wrong people get them. Close to home, there was Santa Fe high school where the kid got it from his parents, also Sutherland Springs where the guy had some history of domestic violence (and went on to shoot up the place) but was still able to have one. The Parkland student also had serious problems seen by other students and was able to buy one legally. Sandy Hook, kid got it from his ... step mother? There’s a problem we’re not identifying here.. A friend was saying we can identify potential would-be serial killers with three symptoms and get them help (or isolation), why aren’t we identifying them now like those brats? Is it worth it not doing anything and lose a child or two?
@@bobdobalina8910 hahahah. I get it. However, if there’s one key thing I could identify behind the basis of all Stossel’s videos, is that self accountability is how things work best (the private market and incentive to do good), and not so much when there’s no punishment for being careless or subsidized (government owned stuff. Not that it’s always bad). Background checks, safeguarding our guns from unauthorized users, and investigating potential threats is a better way to go. That way people would be careful with who gets them, who may be a psychopath or criminal. I wish people could agree.
@@WinginWolf during school, if a kid is showing signs of mental illness, I'm perfectly fine with helping them, but to take their right forever because they were diagnosed with some mental illness in middle instead of helping them is not the way to do things(things like that have happened before). And for adults we can't be constantly monitoring every aspect of their lives because of the less than 1 percent who end up doing a bad thing with guns. Encouraging and teaching responsible gun ownership from a young age and getting rid of gun free zones would be a lot better. Shootings only happen in gun free zones with a lack of armed security after all🤷🏽♂️
When the solution is that obvious and she kept on insisting without any refute, of course he would be annoyed. Me I would be pissed if she kept yapping like that.
Glad George Washington didn't listen to that kind of crap. Or Thomas Edison when scientists said an incandescent light bulb was impossible, based on their limited (non-omniscient) knowledge. Leftists are fearful control freaks. True Rightists are those who fearlessly go where no one has gone before -- adding value to civilization, rather than sucking it dry.
That the artificial horns could give for rhinos to survive. Pairing the two ideas is what might lead to the end of rhino poaching, not one or the other.
She said “but they were criminals” when John talked about people killed during prohibition.....she COMPLETELY missed the point. So typical of an extremist, double down on their own insanity
@@bobdobalina8910 Heyyyy where can I enlist? I heard the death rate on that job is actually pretty good! Only 1000 deaths sounds like a freaking bargain to me, as long as I get paid "at least" 45 000 franks I'm your boi :D
4:32 She realized she had lost the argument and stuck her head back in the sand. "This is an endless argument." Of course it is when you lose your point and still refuse to concede.
"Organization like mine" that's all I needed to hear from that women. Shes now protecting her livelihood, not the rhinos. She has clearly benefited greatly from her position and doesn't want to give it up.
That's a baseless accusation and strictly speculation. Animal rights groups are also non-profit and solely concerned for the wellbeing of animals which is why their funds to to potential lobbying and investigations in favor of abolishing cruel practices towards them. The movement isn't a business, it doesn't provide services or commercial goods to profit off of.
If you don't want there to be criminals stop making stupid laws that enrich them. Beer horns,, all the same. Legislators make laws to enrich corporations thru lobbyist. Simple solution.
@@Dave-ty2qp Need to outlaw them lobbyists. Heck, I'd like to find a good replacement to publicly-traded corporations, because... like Socialism... it always devolves into the lowest human common denominator -- egregious selfishness. And careful with "simple solutions." The Globalists are experts at presenting seemingly "simple" solutions which create far more dangerous problems. Take "Term Limits," for example. They don't solve the intended problem -- congressional corruption, because most of the corrupt ones were corrupt BEFORE running for office. Plus, Term Limits create new problems: a false sense of accomplishment, and blocking the good guys from staying on to protect the Constitution.
@@RodMartinJr The simple solution that I thought was obvious was to replace crooked legislatures, but only the voters can do that, and they seem to be too lazy, or too stupid to know who they should vote for. Their only interest seems to be what's in it for me instead how does it benefit our nation. We deserve what we voted for.
That's not an excuse to remove laws altogether. Your's and Stossel's logic basically means we should abolish the legal system altogether which would send society to hell.
Cuz common sense is the tool of the right. Not shocking at all that she is allowing emotion to override logic, even when its plainly explained to her. That's what libs do.
If the college kids actually remembered their psychology class, they might remember that when you say to a child "no, you cannot have it", it makes them want it even more. This girl is a moron. Flood the market, bring the price down, remove incentive, save the animal. HER argument is childish...it's about being a SJW. "HEY! WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER FAKE HERO!
Why not do both? That is the most logical option I see. Increase supply and over the long term decrease demand. Both is the best outcome. It is simple supply and demand economics
There's so many laws in Portland (been around there many times) you get pulled over for making a godamn U turn in the middle of the night with no traffic.
@@davidwburkhart When the government does not represent you and refuses to listen to your needs - while also making it illegal for you to work via price fixing labor while inflating currency - what do you propose someone in that situation does? I am completely against violence, but we need to empathize with these people to some extent. First the government manufactures criminals, then gets mad that they exist... We live in the most moronic, self-imploding, instigating, selfish, narcissistic version of the US government in history, and its always getting worse ; not better.
@ I didn't say it wasn't illegal, I said they pull you over. I've made "illegal" U-turns in several states, even in front of cops, and nobody blinked an eye - but in portland its happened multiple times, sometimes by a cop a block away, you do the math!
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." The real extinction these agencies are trying to prevent is their own, because if the problem is solved, they would disappear.
Every time a Watermelon demands we act quickly to save the [whatever] it means they are trying to take more control over the lives of we serfs. If it means allowing people more freedom, we have to wait. And of disaster happens while we wait, well, that's our fault for not doing what they said.
"It takes time" to kill so many animals there will be too few left to support the sale of their products. If we wait long enough, they'll be extinct and that will be the end of the problem. Leftists aren't stupid or insane, They think you are.
If you solved the poaching problem, what would these people do for a living? It's like most other Charities. They don't want you to solve the problem, they just want your donation.
Holy shit, Mr. Matt Markus is playing 4D chess, that's a genius idea, I wish him the best with his endeavors, he has a real chance to make a difference. "Environmentalist" groups don't have an aversion to capitalism, it's quite the opposite. Their market is selling people a sense of moral superiority, much like the medieval catholic church selling indulgences. They have found a truly good cause, which is the conservation of wildlife, and milk it, convincing people that giving them and only them money will do good with that cause, and of course they're the only authority on the subject. Poaching creates demand for their "services", if it stops they go out of business. It's perfect capitalism, they are selling a product that has no production cost, no necessary delivery, a seemingly inexhaustible supply, a perpetual demand and is intangible, it's pretty much selling you the air that you breathe.
Even if the fact aids in the virtue that they are seeking. That is to preserve the species. Yet, it seems that the unspoken virtue in her movement is "Capitalism is bad."
She’s probably the kind of person who argues that abortion, the killing of human babies, should be legal because “it happens whether it’s legal or illegal”, and that it might as well be safe for the woman. In this scenario, not only is it a rhino dying as opposed to a human baby…but also it’s not actually a rhino, it’s FAKE RHINO HORNS, and she’s saying that we shouldn’t make something unethical a legal thing to do.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
If Rhinos are safe then the animal charities will receive fewer donations.
BINGO!
Ahhh the enlightened one! That is the truth, all about self interest for these “charities”
I always annoys me whenever people try to use charity as a solution to widespread problems, regardless of political position. Charities have never worked as the primary solution of societal problems and can never work, for the same reason government fails - it's a centralized solution that does not take into account the complexities of the economy. One such example are shoe manufacturers with a selling point that they donate a pair of shoes to african countries for each pair bought. Result: many shoe businesses went bankrupt because too many people stopped buying shoes.
Don't worry then jeff bezos will send billions of dollars to them to advertise how they're going to extinct and stop projects important for growth.
That is the truth!
“Our ad reached 40 Million people”
So has Raid Shadow Legends. That doesn’t mean anything
Well the effects haven't trickled down yet...
@@kaseyberry5496 When she said trickle down, I was thinking "oh, so trickle down does work now? lol"
Translation: We spent a lot of money on advertisement and do nothing substantial
@@waltermh111 yeah, anyways.
They have to show they spend money on something other than themselves, so they just purchase advertisement space.
“This argument is circular” No it wasn’t, he completely contradicted your argumentative point!! He proved you very wrong!
@Kevin Yes
"So what? These international bodies are stupid."
"No! They're folks like meee. . . "
Uh, kinda a self-own there ma'am.
Yea she fell right into it and then scooted it under the rug
"I have an idea, what if we made poaching double illegal?"
She didn't say it was a circular argument, she said it was an endless argument. She's still dumb af though.
"This is an endless argument" No you ended it when you couldn't refute it anymore
indeed
She is terrible at debating!! Having nothing to stand on doesn't go very far in a debate, especially with John!!
Exactly! She got pushed into a corner. Her argument is stupid, she is stupid. John should have just outright said it.
She didn't argue properly here but Stossel's argument was logically flawed. An immoral action has to be illegal, and if it is the law will take it seriously enough to enforce it. Calling compassionate people "cruel" cause their bans lead to cruel people continuing to be cruel doesn't make sense. Rights groups aren't responsible for the actions of poachers and can't control how they act any more than enacting legislation against them. When animal hunting is outlawed, it will objectively make an impact by bringing legal attention to it and thus stopping the perpetrators. Stossel's logic is like saying we should make child trafficking legal cause people will be more motivated to do it if it's illegal.
@@sachinraghavan4556 The dumbest argument.
"One way to devalue something is actually to create a lot of it."
US Federal Reserve: "You don't say..."
Moneyprinters in Weimar Germany: Hold my beer
Shhhh you’re not supposed to know that
Booooom!
I could use some "easing" right about now. Said nobody.
Great observation! The Fed is unto something. And the real rhinos lovers are mimicking.
She cares more about feeling good about herself than actually saving Rhinos.
Welcome to the far left.
@JC Denton Agreed. She wasn't a screamer, or a self proclaimed victim.
We've reached 40 million vietnamese people
She cares about the money the organization receives from endangered species.
THAT is EXACTLY RIGHT!!! "THE ROAD TO HELL...."
But intentions never intended to benefit the cause, only the pious agent.
Truth from John Stossel:
"Their hostility to capitalism makes them blind to better ideas." Worldwide.
They care more about "feeling" good than actually doing good
the free market can solve a lot of they issues they are fighting , but them being lefties who think the market is evil , makes it impossible to actually solve anything
I love how straight forward Stossel is.
We need more people like him
She has a cushy, cozy, high paying job that a smart solution will make obsolete.
Yep. She also gets to virtue signal
and get's adored, praised, loved AND gets 'Hero' status, hero worship AND 'virgin mary' glorious holy virtuous 'saint' status.
She and all like her will kill 1000 Rhinos (they do) to keep that going for as long as they live.
It's like Doctors don't really want a cure for Cancer because it will take away their money for the treatments. There are many cures for Cancer. But they don't want people to know about them.
And thats it. They just want to get paid.
@@lorishiversdogmom You are one million percent true!!!!!! And research is almost as big of an industry as the treatment and care industry that is making a lot of people rich!!!!!!! They don't want a cure!!!!
She cannot admit that she might be wrong.
She can't because she's fighting for survival, her survival as an activist to save rhinos.
@@elenabob4953 excellent comment that will also apply to many other activists and their self-promoting politicized objectives ! Your comment should be pinned !
This is critical. She has waaaay too much invested to admit that she might be wrong. Even she said it: “it takes time for that trickle down to occur”. She won’t be convinced of something like that overnight.
The thought never crossed her mind. She said they were making progress. The Dont Do Drugs campaign got alot of views as well and it had no affect on the demand. How can you claim that views alone are working when poaching is increasing.
typical karen bruh
Of course she’s against it, she would lose her job if she wasn’t. There wouldn’t be a need for her “nonprofit” as they’re racking 6 figures. These type of conservationists are jokesters.
I think it's worse than that. She unthinkingly hates humans.
Just please, when taking action against them, such as by voting, please think also on how to replace them. Because someone should be addressing this...
Shes just like Democrats in America. All about the money.
She's getting a profit/salary!!!! She's like the Dem politician or Professor pushing socialism/quasi communism: they're collecting a paycheck/money for pushing utter bullshit nonsense and they don't see the hypocrisy!!!
In other words. They're not really in it to help the problem. They're just obsessed with it for money.
She’s worried about her job and everyone like her.
She’s also projecting. “Muh greenwashing” is exactly all her kind specializes in.
Less Rhinos = livelihood secure
More Rhinos = my job superfluous
Yes.
@@KandiKlover lol so true
"Those international bodies are stupid."
"No, they're folks like me."
"That's what I said."
Haha thats what we all wanted to hear.
I would love to hear that said to her... but I think they'll sue him if he did...
@@adrielpahati185 Sue him for what? Pain and suffering?
I loved that part!
She's super cute. Reminds of my wife, if my wife didn't have any common sense.
“So what, these international bodies are stupid”
“YES, they’re folks like me”
Fixed
LOL, you took my comment right from my fingertips.
@Xad Kile that was like a 5th degree burn
Absolutely lmao burn
Environmental groups "can't see it" as he said....because their income is derived from the fight against it. They won't do the right thing because it affects their bank account. So, marginalize them and move on.
Number one, you can't use reason on the liberal mind, they are driven solely by emotion, please stop. Number two....there is no number two, they are retarded and evil and that's pretty much where we are.
Of course she jumps to extremes saying "are we going to farm every animal out there to satisfy our sick bloodlust" and my man Stossel comes back with "YEAH If it saves and protects the animals!"
@Xad Kile In fact, those animal species have diversified due to unique tastes of people.
*Activists* - _"we need to save these animals from extinction."_
*people* - _"we are by useing proper conservation practices like rhino farms and imitation horns"_
*Activists* - _"no, not like that!"_
*people* - 🤦
Farm the whales!
She’s more concerned about her job.
@@jackmcslay actually, what saved the whales was finding a cheaper alternative, petroleum.
As an amateur conservationist, I was ecstatic once I heard that they successfully, artificially recreated rhino horn and can produce it through 3-D printing. I still am hopeful that it can save the lives of humans and rhinos alike.
So refreshing to see real journalism with no holds barred. The people making these laws are stupid he told her to her face. We need more like John.
Damn straight! Not sure how the establishment ever allowed him to become popular.
@@savagetruthercritic8646 he kept his mouth shut and nose clean until his libertarian worldview matured within him. I did the same with voting, never voting until I knew what I believed in; I heartily recommend the same to other's, in particular the young.
@@savagetruthercritic8646 \ Hes older\established before the huge take over. You will notice no young actors will dare come out like this because it means no future career.
He also tells those teachers unions to their face too
@@buddmcstudd6994
Isnt it nice that the current "stimulus" checks are sending over 128 million to teachers unions? Apparently the people come last. I guess its better then the millions sent to foreign lands for "gender studies".. However 10 million is being sent to the "preservation" of native American languages...whatever that is.
Covid lockdowns are the biggest scam in recent American history if not in the top 5.
“Because those groups are stupid”
“No, I’m one of them”
My point exactly
Environmentalist groups want to stay relevant and keep making money for their cause.
Its been proven, and bore out n the facts and numbers that, conservation groups r what help our species. Its crazy how strong some people feel about PETA and similar groups but don't really look at what they do or how many animals they euthanize. Or how many animals r saved by culling out some of them. Elephants as an example. If u charge $75,000 to hunt a bull elephant who can no longer breed and has become destructive but, then use that money to support the elephants that can better the population numbers. Not to mention all the animals some groups like PETA "save", then euthanize them. But people donate money to idiots that willingly choose to put gorilla glue n their hair only to find out that's a really dumb idea, or black lives matter that takes almost 100% of their donations and gives it to politicians instead of worthy causes so, I'm not shocked people support things that don't help or even hurt the end goal.
Most green organizations are more like watermelons.
Green on the outside, communist red on the inside.
This is the most confrontational I've seen Stossel be while interviewing a leftist. And she needed it.
I was surprised he was very confrontational but still fairly respectful but it needed to be pretty tough cuz these people are nuts I used to be one of them kind of LOL
I didn’t like it. I like it when he is not confrontational. I feel like being confrontational makes emotions happen and that is not what i like.
@@iamsearchingforthefiletmignon That would be what we refer to as a wimp. Sometimes called a pushover. AKA as gutless.
@@iamsearchingforthefiletmignon Emotions are already there from the beginning, because the arguments on the left are nothing but emotion. Reality itself is confrontational.
She's an executive with a product to sell: Ad campaigns. No poachers, no campaign. So there...
John's "Devil's Advocate" method of interviewing is brilliant. I have been watching John since his days as a local reporter in NYC. That was 50-60 years ago and he was great then and still is.
This woman couldn't argue her way out of a paper bag. CONTROL FREAKS!
she's just milking that "NFP" money
I don't think that she couldn't argue. I think it's that she has no argument. By the way who knows where I can buy a breeding pair of rhinos
Yes, freaks need to be controlled. Control freaks now!
I really don't get this whole tell everyone what to do and how to live their lives! Get your own life, and leave US good hardworking American People the heck alone!
Why was I not surprised when some tone-deaf millennial woman who wouldn't listen to reason at the heart of this problem?
Put it on the he bright side, at least she accepted a uncomfortable discution.
@@elenabob4953 i suppose
*Activists* - _"we need to save these animals from extinction."_
*people* - _"we are by useing proper conservation practices like rhino farms and imitation horns"_
*Activists* - _"no, not like that!"_
*people* - 🤦
Shes a vegetarian...."bloodlust" comment was over the top
@@motorcitymanman7711 please, I’m sure she’s a vegan. In her mind farming chickens for eggs is slavery.
Making milk and beef illegal would make cows endangered too!
Your god damned right. Push this fake meat bullshit, make cows the next 'kings deer', and watch as Mississippi river piracy and cattle rustling raises back from the history books.
Milk bootleggers for dairy products. Black market for yogurt and cheese.
Yeah, the domestic cow will not fair very well as a wild animal.
I think it would increase the odds of starvation and famine, too.
@@bryan81584 it’s just like in that movie Demolition Man, haha!
"No we're not, we're succeeding!"
No....no you're not. Stats don't lie.
they are succeeding in growing their organization in size, but not in achieving the proclaimed goal (which isn't the real goal anyway).
Stats lie because everybody can make an study of whatever nowadays, but FACTS, FACTS dont lie
@@tightbootyhole707 yes
"These people are stupid"
"No, they're like me"
...
Rhinos going extinct is no good. I would prefer that RINOs go extinct.
Thought he was going to say like you
@@elgatofelix8917 amen!
@@elgatofelix8917 i don’t get it
People who buy rhino s horn are stupid
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
― Mark Twain
Good quote
"Judaism is Communism" - Rabbi Harry Waton
If that’s true, then this woman was something other than stupid, because John just b slaped the stupid right out of her narrative
Also quoted by Wayne & Katie Campbell in the Hulu Series “Letterkenny “.
Love that quote.
Why don’t they clone more rhinos and make more Stossels too
Imagine a whole country just made up of Stossels.
Stossel 2.0 is real.
Stossel etnostate
I don't k ow if we can handle that much moustache power.
Don't forget you have to put up with liberal Stossel as he grows up
“It takes time”
All the rhinos could be gone by then, sweet heart.
I like how at 2:05 she immediately rebuts Stossel for saying it will take time. But then at 3:30 she readily admits her plan will take time.
She is a Kool-Aid drinker, so she will never be persuaded. Sure her cause is noble, but she has a one tracked mind, and her disdain for using any animal as a "commodity" is blinding her to other solutions that do not fit her dogma.
In 19th century New Orleans, there was an interesting saying about prostitution she should think about.
"You can make it illegal, but you can't make it un-popular"
Ironically, you can make things unpopular by not making them illegal
@@Shotblur kind of weird tbh
It is better to have a tough regulation than outright banned an item.
But well it is reality we live in
@@manghariz2211 nope not better at all
@@KandiKlover Honestly, it is better, Alcohol and tobacco havee some strict regulations on em and those work better than any ban ever would, i would prefer softer regulation or none of course, but between regulation and ban, i'll take regulation.
@@RollinsFN pragmatic but fair
“When you’re talking about beer or wine or scotch there are no lives on the line.” Lady alcoholism is an enormous issue across the world and has major impacts on families.
Most women are addicted to something. The whole "rose' all day" stereotype My mom had a prescription "diet pill" problem.
@@dperry19661 Mothers little helper. ( Rolling Stones )
Maybe she means "no animal lives on the line"
The American alligator was an endangered species until alligator farms were legalized to produce leather, as long as a certain percentage of their animals were released to the wild. The American alligator has made a huge comeback as a result.
Why can’t they do both. Sell fake horns to those that don’t follow her promotion and no horns sold to those that do?
It’s a win win. Why can’t she see that?
Because to her it's not annoy saving the rhinos... It's about controlling people
Because her cushy, high paying job will be gone if they actually SAVE the rinos & then she will have to think of a new, even more stupid job that doesn’t actually help humans or animals!
I wouldn't be surprised if liberals turned around and became activist for fake animals.
Monotech2.0 What points would those be? Farming rhinos reduces poaching, increase population size and will in effect save the species from extinction. That’s the goal of conservationists in general.
Every good action, no matter how noble, ultimately turns into extremism. We should be kind and protect animals whilst at the same time taking care not to demonise humans.
She doesn't care about the rhinos, she's just trying to keep her cushy job.
And her high status. When you’re “saving the rhinos” you’re considered noble and everyone’s sympathetic to your cause
In general, that's how charities are. Most don't actually care about the unfortunate; they just want the donations to keep flowing in, so they can keep their cushy jobs and brag about how moral they are. For every good charity, there are a lot more bad ones. If poverty ended tomorrow, most of these "charities" would be out of a job, so what incentive do they actually have to fix the problem? None.
She's in too deep, if she admits to herself that her method is wrong she's admitting that she contributed to the poaching of rhinos.
Exactly, leechers of society using bad government restrictions to make a profit
It's not about results it's about virtue signaling to strangers what a good person you are!
Emotional monkeys could not be debated, they should be mocked.
'Ooh ohh ahh ahh, I save rinos with fee fees, they still die, me so good!'
Exactly! Shes a cultural Karen that's going to teach the brown people that Rhino horns are bad. Her video was seen by alot of people yall. Of course poaching is still on the rise but she looks great in her eyes and she gets paid.
Whilst profiting immensely
Sounds like a line from Atlas Shrugged.
Yup!
His responses border on heroic. His facial cues when he says some things she must hate are artful.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Was a good Randy Travis song.
And these days its an 8 lane highway.
The road to hell is paved with good-looking bad intentions.
She is in love with her cause, not with the animals or results.
Environmentalism is a cult. A very dangerous cult.
Control. Women are obsessed with control
@@candorsspot2775 Liberals are obsessed with control.
and her job
And power, typically of leftists
"They're stupid!"
"No, they're folks like me".....
She just rekt herself with that one.
That was my favorite part 😂
He’s like “yeah, exactly” lmao
They edit it that way. It's all made to make people he disagrees with look like idiots.
This is high quality journalism. Rare to come by these days. God bless you Stossel.
The real problem is, if you solve the problem she and her friends are out of a job.
Jobs are like energy. They are neither created nor destroyed, just converted.
They could join the new fake rhino horn manufacturing, or rhino farming industries. Or said jobs that would benefit from such, such as agriculture, plumbing, etc.
@@lanceclemings4510 that's a poor analogy not gonna lie
@@lanceclemings4510 demonstrably not true or there'd be several billion people in the world unemployed. Jobs do get created.
Meanwhile, concentration camps are dismissed by the president as being part of "different culture."
which one
@@harmanjotsingh4230 chinese culture
@@harmanjotsingh4230 Chinese Concentration camps are dismissed by President Biden
@@daskampffredchen source?
@@michaelmichael2382 It's all over in the news. Biden himself said so. One Google search and you'll find video of him saying it.
This is what happens when we're governed by emotions and not logical thought.
This is a key marker to identify a leftist.
@@Dave-ty2qp Bingo!
So true. I use to care about these groups but not anymore. Society of hypocrites is what they are. They will never admit their wrong doing!!!
Absolutely correct
Amen to that brotha.
In 2017, I volunteered in a rhino sanctuary. This particular place takes care of orphan rhinos that are left behind by poachers.
What they informed us was exactly what this video says. The best solution for poaching is the legalization of rhino horn trade. There were a bunch of rhino farmers ready to influx the market and also synthetic rhino horn is undetectable. Plus, it is possible to dehorn a rhino without hurting it as far as you don’t hit the nerve. Also, it will grow back (it’s made of keratin like your hair and nails).
Anyways, the message ion this video is 100% correct. And that’s also what was spread to the volunteers in the sanctuary I went to assist.
*sees environmentalist* "Oh she's kinda cute!"
*environmentalist starts talking* "Never mind"
I'm not trying to marry her.
Nearly two and a half thousand years ago a poet wrote better to keep your mouth zipped and let people think you're stupid, rather than open it and prove their point.
"So what? These international bodies are stupid." Then she opens her mouth and proves you right.
what does the saying goes? Better to be silent and be thought stupid than opening up your mouth and remove all doubt??
And she is, but Stossel left it up to her to conclude that.
I LOVE how he makes her look dumb and literally trumps everything she says!!! And he called her stupid!!!
I love it too.
That WoPeople definitely need to rethink zer carriere XD
Well, he really told her the plan/idea was stupid.
He really doesn't. He just makes insulting accusations that she doesn't properly argue against. Stossel is being nothing but insulting by claiming that rights advocates who enact bans are somehow "cruel" cause of the actions of poachers. It's not in their fault that poachers still choose to be cruel, the whole point of a hunting ban is to enable legal enforcement and intervention to stop animal murderers.
"No. If you save the rhinos then where will I get money from?" is all she needed to say.
"We can't live in a lawless society" she says. Yet it is she that is pushing the ineffective laws that make it "lawless".
"Where would we be without laws to break?" - this bimbo.
@@LordsofMedia Oh, that nails it. Exactly! The insanity of making something illegal merely to justify your career! Sounds like what Thomas Sowell went through when he worked at US Dept. of Labor after he suggested testing the "Minimum Wage" hypothesis. Their reaction cured him of Marxism.
@@pedropradacarciofi2517 Laws/rules go both ways. They allow for actions to take place or prohibit them. She is not advocating for a lawful society in places where hunting is allowed.
Nowadays we are living in this Society criminals are becoming martyrs and people are praising them
It's not her fault that poachers continue to be cruel despite a law being passed. She's doing the right thing by advocating the ban. You need to stop projecting the cruel deeds of poachers onto her.
Stossel is a savage! Omg I'm dying! "You people have your head in the sand."
"So what? These international bodies are stupid."
"No, they're folks like _me!"_
*Exactly*
"It's takes time for that trickle-down effect."
So now trickle-down is good.
Right? Leftists have no real beliefs and will just flip flop all over themselves to sell whatever their current scam is.
I'm sure she votes Republican 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@ant ant you have a brain of a ant, you would make a great college professor.
@ant In the working world there is a saying, if you can't do the job become a union agent or a college professor.
I thought the exact same thing!
She's trying to fight for her job security even if it means more poaching and more rhinos being killed.
I admire her for coming on the show but John has her dead to rights lol.
Due to the context of the video I find your words interestingly phrased. I do agree. She’s fighting an un-winnable battle. John’s points clearly would make more of an immediate impact.
He plays devil's advocate against all his guests, some just take the fire better than others.
@@lamalien2276 This is not a "devil's advocate" attempt .... this is an attempt to enlighten this Organization that their tactics don't work, didn't work, and never will work. His examples are spot on ... it doesn't matter if the object is alive or inanimate, it's the same process. If we have to farm certain animals in order to save those in the wild .... so be it. The day we can stop intentionally cutting the horns off of the wild herd, is the day we have won this battle. Having to rob the wild rhinos of that which makes them rhinos, isn't very humane. The only saving grace is that rhinos can grow back their horns. These activist can't see beyond their own personal self serving feelings, which will get more rhinos killed. China has 1.4 billion people .... that's 1,400,000,000! If have a fraction of a fraction of that population wanting these horns, that will be the end of rhinos if we can't educate that fraction - or provide an alternative. That's the view from here.
"They just cant see it"
OH THEY CAN SEE IT! That's the problem! They can absolutley see their bottom line evaporating and less donations coming their way.
When you legalize farming rhinos, you eliminate the donations that line her pockets
and bring tasty meat to happy customers :)
Bruh didn’t they learn from prohibition that making things illegal don’t work
The prohibition era was (arguably) the last time americans didnt comply with ridiculous or unjust laws. Think this scamdemic shows just how complacent folk have become
Doesn't work for us but works for the politicians.
@@mfspectacular I mean the marijuana prohibition era too?
I'm not sure where you're at but bars and restaurants around me largely stayed open for indoor dining despite the governor's orders.
No on both ends, as evident in immigration restrictions and drug prohibition just as much as gun control and restricting 'environmentally unfriendly' products
No one learned from prohibition
Have been a fan of John Stossel for many years, and he only keeps getting better and better. This piece was brilliant and spot on.
I got pretty upset when i realized John is 74 years old now. Seems we’re not gonna have him around for too long
"We are reaching millions of people."
But are you persuading the people who are spending $300,000 per horn?
Someone came to my class 5 years ago to talk about rhino poaching. I asked him why they can't just sell all the horns themselves which would raise money to protect them, lower the price by a lot, and reduce the number of horns that poachers can steal
I love that he calls them out on their hypocrisy.
Stossel is the only one being hypocritical. He claims to care about rhinos but supports the idea of farming them for resources to be acceptable as long as it keeps their population alive, even if it kills several individuals. Masha is advocating for an anti hunting ban that will give legal enforcement against wannabe animal killers, there's nothing remotely illogical or hypocritical about that. I do wonder if you simply hold a negative impression of animal rights groups.
Good job Stossel! You're a voice in the mist!
I always found it interesting how basic supply and demand economics can solve so many problems.
I have always wondered why so few people seem to grasp basic economics.
wHaT aBoUt mInImUm wAgE wOrKeRs?
cApItAlIsM and fReE tRaDe iS iMmOrAl.
Peaceful individuals exercising their right to freedom is always the key to human progress
This reminds me of one of my family members; loves her animals more than people, but yet continues to feed the worst and the absolute cheapest food on the market to them. It's all about the cause of feeling self-righteous, and we see right through this narcissistic behavior.
It takes three years to grow the horn back. Sounds like farming business to me. Free commerce.
And it’s like clipping a nail. Doesn’t hurt the rhinos at all
Wait I always thought it would kill the animal like cutting off a limb. This makes even less sense to not just allow farmers to raise them for profit.
It is their only form of protection. Shut up and thing about other things before you talk.
@@donaldherman1741 u learn something new everyday brotha.
Also cutting it that short will kill them. When you cut a nail short it hurts and sometimes bleeds. When it is of that size, it will make them bleed out. Shut up
She only cares about justifying her job, not actually about the rhinos.
To be less cynical but no nicer to her, she only cares about how she can make herself feel, not reality. That virtue signaling is a powerful drug.
Her well paid job.
Man, talking to this lady is like her talking about reducing violence by introducing gun control.
@Solaris it mostly didn’t work. It did decrease mass shootings, although Columbine still happened. The biggest failures I always see with mass shootings is people with guns letting the wrong people get them. Close to home, there was Santa Fe high school where the kid got it from his parents, also Sutherland Springs where the guy had some history of domestic violence (and went on to shoot up the place) but was still able to have one. The Parkland student also had serious problems seen by other students and was able to buy one legally. Sandy Hook, kid got it from his ... step mother? There’s a problem we’re not identifying here..
A friend was saying we can identify potential would-be serial killers with three symptoms and get them help (or isolation), why aren’t we identifying them now like those brats? Is it worth it not doing anything and lose a child or two?
BUT GUN CONTROL WORKS! said CRIMINALS everywhere.
@@bobdobalina8910 hahahah. I get it. However, if there’s one key thing I could identify behind the basis of all Stossel’s videos, is that self accountability is how things work best (the private market and incentive to do good), and not so much when there’s no punishment for being careless or subsidized (government owned stuff. Not that it’s always bad). Background checks, safeguarding our guns from unauthorized users, and investigating potential threats is a better way to go. That way people would be careful with who gets them, who may be a psychopath or criminal. I wish people could agree.
@@WinginWolf during school, if a kid is showing signs of mental illness, I'm perfectly fine with helping them, but to take their right forever because they were diagnosed with some mental illness in middle instead of helping them is not the way to do things(things like that have happened before). And for adults we can't be constantly monitoring every aspect of their lives because of the less than 1 percent who end up doing a bad thing with guns. Encouraging and teaching responsible gun ownership from a young age and getting rid of gun free zones would be a lot better. Shootings only happen in gun free zones with a lack of armed security after all🤷🏽♂️
@@WinginWolf The increase in mass shootings occurred specifically because the liberals shut down insane asylums. The end.
That wasn't an interview, that was a slaughter... He destroyed every shred of credibility Masha Kalinina **thought** she had.. Stossel ain't no Punk!
he said: "international bodies are stupids"
she laugh: "no, there're folks like me..."
I rest my case.
LMAO yup
Strossel usually seems like he is messing around, but serious. This time he seems serious with very little mess around lol
When the solution is that obvious and she kept on insisting without any refute, of course he would be annoyed. Me I would be pissed if she kept yapping like that.
I noticed that too.
This is the ultimate example of “Wait, you can’t do that. That’s illegal!”
Glad George Washington didn't listen to that kind of crap. Or Thomas Edison when scientists said an incandescent light bulb was impossible, based on their limited (non-omniscient) knowledge. Leftists are fearful control freaks. True Rightists are those who fearlessly go where no one has gone before -- adding value to civilization, rather than sucking it dry.
@@RodMartinJr that kind of crap wasn't allowed to vote back then .
“But our policies are working!!”
“No they aren’t!”
“Ok it takes time”
3:43
Time that the rhinos don't have
That the artificial horns could give for rhinos to survive. Pairing the two ideas is what might lead to the end of rhino poaching, not one or the other.
Timestamp is wrong
She said “but they were criminals” when John talked about people killed during prohibition.....she COMPLETELY missed the point. So typical of an extremist, double down on their own insanity
Yeah. Complete misses the point that if alcohol was legal, their whole reason for being criminals would be a flop.
But it's OK. We are creating JOBS through the predations & loss of life! There are dozens of Ranger openings coming up every few weeks!!!
Exactly, Laws define criminals, not being a "bad" person. Ink on paper = criminal maker.
@@bobdobalina8910 Heyyyy where can I enlist? I heard the death rate on that job is actually pretty good! Only 1000 deaths sounds like a freaking bargain to me, as long as I get paid "at least" 45 000 franks I'm your boi :D
I love how passionate and unforgiving John is in this video.
Genius making a genius video
She basically said "I don't want your solution to get in the way of my self righteousness." So short sighted on her part.
She is too stupid to realize the evil she has enabled. In my mind that makes her just as evil.
She's like the mayor in JAWS
I think its actually that she doesn’t want to solution to get in the way of keeping her job
4:32 She realized she had lost the argument and stuck her head back in the sand. "This is an endless argument." Of course it is when you lose your point and still refuse to concede.
Stossel cares more about the environment that all the so called enviromentalists he interviewed so far combined
"Organization like mine" that's all I needed to hear from that women. Shes now protecting her livelihood, not the rhinos. She has clearly benefited greatly from her position and doesn't want to give it up.
That’s what happens with educated idiots without skills.
That's a baseless accusation and strictly speculation. Animal rights groups are also non-profit and solely concerned for the wellbeing of animals which is why their funds to to potential lobbying and investigations in favor of abolishing cruel practices towards them. The movement isn't a business, it doesn't provide services or commercial goods to profit off of.
Bahaha
"We can't live in a lawless society."
Well, your laws aren't working, so...
If you don't want there to be criminals stop making stupid laws that enrich them. Beer horns,, all the same. Legislators make laws to enrich corporations thru lobbyist. Simple solution.
@@Dave-ty2qp Need to outlaw them lobbyists. Heck, I'd like to find a good replacement to publicly-traded corporations, because... like Socialism... it always devolves into the lowest human common denominator -- egregious selfishness.
And careful with "simple solutions." The Globalists are experts at presenting seemingly "simple" solutions which create far more dangerous problems. Take "Term Limits," for example. They don't solve the intended problem -- congressional corruption, because most of the corrupt ones were corrupt BEFORE running for office. Plus, Term Limits create new problems: a false sense of accomplishment, and blocking the good guys from staying on to protect the Constitution.
@@RodMartinJr The simple solution that I thought was obvious was to replace crooked legislatures, but only the voters can do that, and they seem to be too lazy, or too stupid to know who they should vote for. Their only interest seems to be what's in it for me instead how does it benefit our nation. We deserve what we voted for.
That's not an excuse to remove laws altogether. Your's and Stossel's logic basically means we should abolish the legal system altogether which would send society to hell.
I have honestly come to love the way Stossel shatters his opponents with brutal common sense.
Cuz common sense is the tool of the right. Not shocking at all that she is allowing emotion to override logic, even when its plainly explained to her. That's what libs do.
What’s the definition of insanity? To bad logic isn’t logical to some. Save the Rhino...through Capitalism!!!
If the college kids actually remembered their psychology class, they might remember that when you say to a child "no, you cannot have it", it makes them want it even more. This girl is a moron.
Flood the market, bring the price down, remove incentive, save the animal.
HER argument is childish...it's about being a SJW. "HEY! WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER FAKE HERO!
Why not do both? That is the most logical option I see. Increase supply and over the long term decrease demand. Both is the best outcome. It is simple supply and demand economics
Obviously she is against an actual solution, otherwise how would the company that employs her make any profits?
There is a RINO in Utah named Mitt Romney, you can have him for free.
I scrolled 300 comments to find a RINO joke
He's hornless, they don't want him, either.
Best burn on mitt ever hahaha 🤣
"We can't live in a lawless society" , Let me tell you about Portland Oregon.
There's so many laws in Portland (been around there many times) you get pulled over for making a godamn U turn in the middle of the night with no traffic.
@@jacinthclifton636 Meanwhile, antifa burns the city!
@@davidwburkhart When the government does not represent you and refuses to listen to your needs - while also making it illegal for you to work via price fixing labor while inflating currency - what do you propose someone in that situation does? I am completely against violence, but we need to empathize with these people to some extent. First the government manufactures criminals, then gets mad that they exist... We live in the most moronic, self-imploding, instigating, selfish, narcissistic version of the US government in history, and its always getting worse ; not better.
@ I didn't say it wasn't illegal, I said they pull you over. I've made "illegal" U-turns in several states, even in front of cops, and nobody blinked an eye - but in portland its happened multiple times, sometimes by a cop a block away, you do the math!
@ im talking seattle, las vegas, tacoma, minneapolis. I don't drive a lot in rural areas other than to get between big cities.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
The real extinction these agencies are trying to prevent is their own, because if the problem is solved, they would disappear.
The bottom line is, their gravy train would be halted!
These "environmentalists" make me sick!
All NGO and activist groups end up like this. They outlive their intentions.
She's part of a HUGE business....can't let that go. Thanx for being rational Stossel.
Gotta love when the solution is "if only criminals didn't commit crimes"
@Inda Now this more like banning consensual sex in order to reduce rape.
@Inda Now logic isn't your strong suit , is it ?
The least you can do to prevent crime is to pass legislation. It's not the fault of a compassionate individual that cruel people choose to be cruel.
"It takes time for that trickle-down effect" I can't take this woman seriously!
Every time a Watermelon demands we act quickly to save the [whatever] it means they are trying to take more control over the lives of we serfs.
If it means allowing people more freedom, we have to wait. And of disaster happens while we wait, well, that's our fault for not doing what they said.
Yet, theses are the same type of people that say "THERE'S NO TIME TO SAVE THE ANIMALS!!".
"It takes time" to kill so many animals there will be too few left to support the sale of their products. If we wait long enough, they'll be extinct and that will be the end of the problem. Leftists aren't stupid or insane, They think you are.
John Stossel is one of the few reporters, who is actually reporting, versus twisting stories to say the opposite of what's actually happening
If you solved the poaching problem, what would these people do for a living? It's like most other Charities. They don't want you to solve the problem, they just want your donation.
"you people have your head in the sand"
-John Stossel
🎯
I thought the word sand was very polite. LOL
that lady went "oof"
because truth is, animals have always been commodities
And always will be.
@Paul Smith Indeed, try not paying your taxes - I think the serf peasants in medieval times payed out about 1/3rd their production on average...
@Paul SmithRight on, case in point right there.
If reason was their primary motivator, they wouldn't be environmentalists.
Oh definitely
They are critical environmental theorists. Your reason and logic is human supremacist.
@@K3end0 lol. It’s what critical theorists would say though. Like human supremacy is some sort of moral failing.
Being human, I'm all for human supremacy. What animal do they want to be supreme?
@@DMichaelAtLarge all animals are equal ;)
Holy shit, Mr. Matt Markus is playing 4D chess, that's a genius idea, I wish him the best with his endeavors, he has a real chance to make a difference.
"Environmentalist" groups don't have an aversion to capitalism, it's quite the opposite. Their market is selling people a sense of moral superiority, much like the medieval catholic church selling indulgences. They have found a truly good cause, which is the conservation of wildlife, and milk it, convincing people that giving them and only them money will do good with that cause, and of course they're the only authority on the subject. Poaching creates demand for their "services", if it stops they go out of business. It's perfect capitalism, they are selling a product that has no production cost, no necessary delivery, a seemingly inexhaustible supply, a perpetual demand and is intangible, it's pretty much selling you the air that you breathe.
Brilliant comment🧡
"She can't admit that she might be wrong."
Sounds like the typical "owner, manager, ceo, supervisor" to me.
Sounds like your typical environmentalist wackjob.
Sounds like a typical liberal...
She's your typical middle manager; an ego driven, insecure, exploitative a-hole.
Moral and “virtue” before facts. Same old song with these activists.
Even if the fact aids in the virtue that they are seeking. That is to preserve the species. Yet, it seems that the unspoken virtue in her movement is "Capitalism is bad."
Shes the cultural Katen out to save the world from poor peoples efforts to make a living. Facts be dammed!
I wonder what Ace Ventura would do about this problem? Lol
@@lorishiversdogmom Whatever he does I bet he keeps the laces out. (remember?)
@@olliefoxx7165 hehehe. Yeah.
The real question is, do you want to save the rhinos, or do you want to advance an ideology while sacrificing the rhinos?
She’s probably the kind of person who argues that abortion, the killing of human babies, should be legal because “it happens whether it’s legal or illegal”, and that it might as well be safe for the woman.
In this scenario, not only is it a rhino dying as opposed to a human baby…but also it’s not actually a rhino, it’s FAKE RHINO HORNS, and she’s saying that we shouldn’t make something unethical a legal thing to do.