Was Islam spread by the sword? by Dr Zakir Naik
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- Was Islam spread by the sword? by Dr Zakir Naik
Video code : T_A_J_17
Islam's view on Terrorism and jihaad - ( INTERACTIVE)
(Pwtc, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 7th Oct . 2012)
PLEASE VISIT OUR OFFICIAL WEBSITES
www.irf.net
zakirnaik
www.plus.google.com/+Drzakirchannel
zakirnaikirf
/ drzakirchannel
www.dailymotion.com/drzakirnaik
Was prophet Mohammed a Warlord and expansion of Islam is by the tip of swords?
"Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things"
Quran , Chapter 2, Verse 256
Embracing Islam was and still is simply a choice !
Islamic so called "Conquest" and the need to hold up arms were attempts of muslims to deliver the word of Islam to those whose kings won't allow it peacefully !
For those who say Islam is a religion that spread by tip of the sword !
Here are historical facts :
- Do you know how many battles happened in the 10 years of prophet Mohammed ‘s life after Islam? it was (80) in 10 years time. From those 80, only 7 where actual fight broke. In those 7 where fight broke the toll death number of Muslims was 139, and from their enemies 112. All for all 251 person killed at 7 battles in ten years’ time.
- The three major battles of those 7 were battle field near Al-Madinah which means the fight was brought to Muslims and they were fighting back in self-defense.
Battles were never sought by muslims to spread Islam only for self-defense.
- Ansar tribe in Al-Madina accepted Islam by the calling of Word. After Settling in Al Madinah, Prophet Mohammed started calling others to Islam by sending letters and emissaries explaining what the religion really is, Why ? because the word of Islam needs to spread amongst their subjects and be heard by all people. He sent a letter to the Great Mqawqas of the Copt in Egypt, He sent to Cesar of Byzantium, to emperor of Persia, None of them accepted Islam but all of them replied diplomatically and with gifts except Byzantium Cesar who tortured and brutally killed the prophet’s emissary; hence the Battle of Mua'ata when prophet sent a battalion of 3000 who won the battle against 100,000 Byzantian.
- Do you know that Big Tribes of Yemen did also receive a letter calling them to Islam and they embraced Islam with a letter because they saw the truth of this religion; so after they embraced Islam, prophet Mohammed send to them 1 man. Only One of his companions with instructions to build a mosque and teach people about Islam. That was it.
- Ok One will say. How about the battles led by caliphates of Muslims who ruled after the death of prophet?. Well As we said, the prophet already tried diplomacy asking those rulers to allow the word of Islam reaching their land but they declined. All Muslim battalions and armies sent to Iraq, Egypt, Persia they all went for one purpose! Remove the barrier that prevents Islam from reaching people. That’s why Islam sets the most exemplary and noble rules of engagement (Do not harm those unarmed civilians, do not kill and elderly, women, or children, do not cut a tree or destroy a building, and when those fighting you surrender take them as prisoners not to be harmed). That’s why the moment a battle is won, Muslims put down the sword, start living among people preaching the word of Islam.
- Do you know that in the Year 100 Hijri (Which is the Islamic Calendar) after 80 years under the role of Islam, the percentage of Muslims among population in Persia was only 5%. And 3% in Iraq, Egypt and Syria 2% and in Andalusia (Parts of Spain) it was
Agreed, muslims generally never forcefully convert a non-muslim to Islam.
But on government levels, Islam's caliphs, specifically Hazrat Umar initiated conquests to neighboring areas. My question is, what motivated these conquests? Because apparently it looks like the Muslim governors wanted to force an Islamic government and caliphate on other surrounding areas even if they were non-Muslims.
Every dynasty has conquered ,but different with caliphs they helped people from genocide from Abbasid to Ottomans state ,the Europeans have always wanted Muslims fight each other that's why we loose and the ruin we are now we must unite as our dear prophet Muhammad peace upon him wanted
“People who worry that nuclear weaponry will one day fall in the hands of the Arabs, fail to realize that the Islamic bomb has been dropped already, it fell the day MUHAMMED (pbuh) was born.” - Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson
+Lee Johnson dear Lee. Islam says no compulsory revert in islam. but what happens in india??? Christians show up the money and buy other religions. moreover when you say Muhammed pbuh killed others. kindly note that most of the genociders of the world was Christians.
Another misquote by Dr Liar Naik!
The original quote by Dr Joseph Adam Pearson is as follows:
“People who worry that nuclear weaponry will one day fall into the hands of *radical Muslims* fail to realize that the *worst* Islamic bomb has been dropped already: It fell the day that Mohammed was born.”
*_Source_*
Joseph Adam Pearson, “Afterword”, in _The Koran (al-Qur’an): Testimony of Antichrist_ (1981; rev. ed., Dayton, Tennessee: Christ Evangelical Bible Institute, 2018), 147 accessed 5 January 2019.
@@syedaziz786 Ezekiel 18:20-22 💞Jesus 💞 The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them.But if a wicked person turns away from all the sins they have committed and keeps all my decrees and does what is just and right, that person will surely live; they will not die. 22 None of the offenses they have committed will be remembered against them. Because of the righteous things they have done, they will live.
@@shees1993 He is not a liar ,he quote in another way with same message
@@adrisajjad6370 This shows that you did not read carefully.
(1) It's _not_ the same; the meaning is totally different, if you know English.
(2) Dr Pearson wrote that _criticizing_ Muḥammad ﷺ and the Muslims, _not_ praising them.
(3) Both Dr Pearson and that book of his are anti-Muslim/anti-Islamic! Read carefully the title of that book.
You can also download that book from the link I've given in the references and see for yourself that it's an anti-Islamic book.
MASHALLAH GREAT talk for non muslims to discover how Islam spread by PEACE . Love & blessings from UK. 😊🙋♀️
Waut Dooghe I disagree in it with him a bit but not with Islam, prove to me our prophet Muhammad SAW was violent and forced people to Islam for no reason. And what did the enemies of Muhammad SAW say about him? And his character?
@Waut Dooghe got any proof for that claim
@@aadilchohan877 Watch More Of His Videos.
Lol 😂
Lol
الله لايحرمنا من علمك دكتور ذاكر
What an Explanation! Awesome ❤
It was narrated that ‘Amr bin ‘Abasah said:
“I came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, which Jihad is best?’ He said: ‘(That of a man) whose blood is shed and his horse is wounded.’”
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا يَعْلَى بْنُ عُبَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا حَجَّاجُ بْنُ دِينَارٍ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ ذَكْوَانَ، عَنْ شَهْرِ بْنِ حَوْشَبٍ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ عَبَسَةَ، قَالَ أَتَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَىُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ قَالَ " مَنْ أُهْرِيقَ دَمُهُ وَعُقِرَ جَوَادُهُ " .
Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
Reference : Sunan Ibn Majah 2794In-book reference : Book 24, Hadith 42English translation : Vol. 4, Book 24, Hadith 2794
Lol he say that Islam wasn't imposed in Indonesia through violence. But it did in every other regions like India.
So why is India still 80% non Muslim? Lol
@@KrimzunFlare Most of the Muslims migrated to west & east Pakistan
"NO COMPULSION IN RELIGION" was Mohammad approach in the early days of Islam, but when he went to Medina and became strong, he started his bloody campaign and the message changed to " اسلم تسلم " which means become a muslim and you will be safe, and Mohammad sent his messengers with this message to the Romans empror , the king of Persia and the king of Egypt.
Mohammad sent more than 80 raids and armies to war and joined his armies in about 30 wars, and the choices that were given to all non beleivers was this:
1- Become muslim and pay zakat
2- stay a non muslim and you have to pay a tax " jizya "
3- If you do not accept the two choices he will kill all males and take all women and children as slaves.
Zakir Naik said let us not talk about the past because the past is the true islam. Islam transformed thru out the years. The Islamization of Malaysia and Indonesia is not an example of the true teachings of Mohammad.
Zakir Naik said history is wrong, BUT QURAN IS NEVER WRONG
Some of the last versus revealed in Quran :
* Fight those who neither believe in Allah nor the Last Day, who do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, and do not embrace the religion of the truth,
﴿ قَاتِلُوا الَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَلَا بِالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ وَلَا يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ وَلَا يَدِينُونَ دِينَ الْحَقِّ مِنَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ حَتَّىٰ يُعْطُوا الْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَاغِرُونَ﴾
Repentance
سورة التوبة
﴿١﴾ بَرَاءَةٌ مِنَ اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ إِلَى الَّذِينَ عَاهَدْتُمْ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ
1. A declaration of immunity from Allah and His Messenger to the associators with whom you had made a treaty.
﴿٢﴾ فَسِيحُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ أَرْبَعَةَ أَشْهُرٍ وَاعْلَمُوا أَنَّكُمْ غَيْرُ مُعْجِزِي اللَّهِ ۙ وَأَنَّ اللَّهَ مُخْزِي الْكَافِرِينَ
2. So travel the land for four months, and know that you cannot escape Allah, and that Allah will disgrace the unbelievers.
﴿٣﴾ وَأَذَانٌ مِنَ اللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ إِلَى النَّاسِ يَوْمَ الْحَجِّ الْأَكْبَرِ أَنَّ اللَّهَ بَرِيءٌ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ ۙ وَرَسُولُهُ ۚ فَإِنْ تُبْتُمْ فَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَكُمْ ۖ وَإِنْ تَوَلَّيْتُمْ فَاعْلَمُوا أَنَّكُمْ غَيْرُ مُعْجِزِي اللَّهِ ۗ وَبَشِّرِ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ
3. And a proclamation from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the Greater Pilgrimage, that Allah has disowned the polytheists, and so did His Messenger. If you repent, it will be better for you. But if you turn away, know that you cannot escape Allah. And announce to those who disbelieve a painful punishment.
﴿٤﴾ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ عَاهَدْتُمْ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَنْقُصُوكُمْ شَيْئًا وَلَمْ يُظَاهِرُوا عَلَيْكُمْ أَحَدًا فَأَتِمُّوا إِلَيْهِمْ عَهْدَهُمْ إِلَىٰ مُدَّتِهِمْ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ
4. Except for those among the idolaters with whom you had made a treaty, and have violated none of its terms, nor aided anyone against you. So fulfill your treaty with them to the end of its term. Allah loves the righteous.
﴿٥﴾ فَإِذَا انْسَلَخَ الْأَشْهُرُ الْحُرُمُ فَاقْتُلُوا الْمُشْرِكِينَ حَيْثُ وَجَدْتُمُوهُمْ وَخُذُوهُمْ وَاحْصُرُوهُمْ وَاقْعُدُوا لَهُمْ كُلَّ مَرْصَدٍ ۚ فَإِنْ تَابُوا وَأَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَآتَوُا الزَّكَاةَ فَخَلُّوا سَبِيلَهُمْ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ
5. Then, when the Sacred Months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them. And capture them, and besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayers, and give the alms, then let them go their way. Allah is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.
The ridiculous mercy of Allah and Mohammad orders the muslim to kill all non beleivers of islam, and break all treaties with non muslim and give them 4 months to convert otherwise Mohammad will be merciful and kill all men and take the women and children as slaves and rap the women like he did with Safia Bent-hoyey صفية بنت حيي were Mohammad killed her father, brother and her newly wed husband and rapped her the same night.
This is your true islam that no one talks about. and it is just the tip of an ice berg. Zakir Naik and all muslim scholars are not telling you the truth,
You do not have to fear anything
just think like Allah ordered you to
Subahanallah Alhamdulillah Allahu Akber
"The jurists [of classical Islam] reached the conclusion that Islam requires consistent military action against unbelieving peoples if no treaty exists with them" (Abdal Hakim Murad, Cambridge University). It is true that the muslims did not _force_ unbelieving peoples to convert to Islam but they did force them to submit to Islamic rule and to pay a tax if they were non-Muslim. Moreover, there was a relentless social pressure applied to non-Muslims, which meant that they were more likely to convert.
Islam is not spread but protect by the sword.
Huh?
@@themistersmith same im confuse
@@explodinggaming1893 it means we defend ourselves with sword but not spread Islam with sword
JazakAllah khair
Then Why Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh Hindu People getting Down ⬇️ U r Totally Biased..U don't know history of India..! Liar
Yeah brainwashed modi supporter.
Islam spread properly at the prophet Muhammad SAW time but the Mughals were bad they killed non Muslims for no reason 😪
Mughals were the most secular. Today India is popular because of Mughals. People come to watch Taj Mahal not some mandir. You are jealous of our success!
As for politics, all empires spread by sword. Even Christianity such as Constantine and Charlemagne So what if Islam did that?
Logically, it spread through Dawah.
This is pure islamaphobia.
Proud Muslim! ❤✌
Truth will always win.
It was narrated that ‘Amr bin ‘Abasah said:
“I came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, which Jihad is best?’ He said: ‘(That of a man) whose blood is shed and his horse is wounded.’”
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا يَعْلَى بْنُ عُبَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا حَجَّاجُ بْنُ دِينَارٍ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ ذَكْوَانَ، عَنْ شَهْرِ بْنِ حَوْشَبٍ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ عَبَسَةَ، قَالَ أَتَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَىُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ قَالَ " مَنْ أُهْرِيقَ دَمُهُ وَعُقِرَ جَوَادُهُ " .
Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
Reference : Sunan Ibn Majah 2794In-book reference : Book 24, Hadith 42English translation : Vol. 4, Book 24, Hadith 2794
I left islam peacefully.
But in Saudi Arabia I would be asked to convert back ... with the sword
Liar
Liar
MashaAllah Alhamdulillah!!!
بعثت بين يدي الساعة بالسيف.
Qutb was a fanatical Muslim. When his garison occupied Delhi under the command of Muhammed Ghari in 1192, he ordered the destruction of twenty-seven Hindu and Jain temples to furnish building materials for the construction of Delhi's first mosque. Quwwat-ul-Islam, the "Glory of Islam," was hastily erected by the young amir, who conscripted an army of local craftsmen, presumably Hindus, to assemble the structure. The Hindu stonemasons repurposed columns from the destroyed temples, but adapting them to use in a mosque proved problematic given Islam's injunction against the use of images in temples. The masons were forced to plaster over the highly sculpted Hindu columns and presumably cover them with geometric designs. However, after centuries of neglect the plaster has fallen away, revealing the original Hindu carvings.
www.orientalarchitecture.com/sid/155/india/delhi/quwwat-ul-islam-mosque
Just another brainwashed bjp fanatic🙄
Which Sword Forced Spreading of Islam to USA// Europe// Japan// Korea// China// Russia// Africa// Australia// New Zealand etc ????????
Islam was spread by The Beauty// Concept of Islam as it is highest Sensesion Makes
of course islam was spread by sword. its typical response of a 4th generation convert that their forefathers chose to convert and were not forced and humiliated to convert to Islam. Ask any Persian how Islam was spread to Iran.
Right
Ma Sha Allah
Best example is “Mongolia”
What dr.zakir said about Indonesia and Malaysia are true. Islam was spread by Arab merchants to Indonesia and Malaysia. But the was a catch that the Sultan-sultan of Indonesia and Malaysia are very influential among their people. When those sultan sultan said that the country official religion is Islam, all citizen converts to Islam....
@Melvin Garcia You weren't listening to the video at all, have you? If Islam spread by the sword, then wouldn't that scare the new reverts from Islam? If that were the case, then Islam wouldn't be the fastest growing religion in the world, withour spread with sword.
@@slickperspective2745 Islam is growing because one man with 4 wives can get 4 children at a go ie high birth rates.
Islam is growing because once you join, you can't leave easily meaning the number can't reduce too fast due to the penalties of apostasy.
@@slickperspective2745 Very weird and stupid comment you made. He sad the truth about merchants and influential figures spreading Islam to Indonesia and Malaysia. that very off topic foolish statement wont get you far in life if you criticize people like that.
Alhumdullilah❤❤❤❤
Allah bless you
Islam does not have refund policy
Mohammed abdulrahman
if someone leave islam the punishment is???????is that a religion of peace???
@@abramshk2947 If someone leaves Islam and betrays the Muslims and goes against them then yes: capital punishment. Those who do not go against/ betray the Muslims and live with peace, then no capital punishment.
solute to Zakir Naik
YES .
Next Question , Please .
srnp0007 When and how?
Moot Juh :-
Read The History .
srnp0007 The video has described that history, and from that history we can conclude that the answer to the question is no. Watch the video before making thoughtless comments.
srnp0007 from where? wikipedia? text book? tell me now what textbook you read (if you did). did you ever check the reference yourself? or you're just a lazy reader who believe everything he read? tell me now...
Moot Juh :-
You Know Zakir is a Cheater ?
He Tells Half Truth .
Which is Equivalent to Cheating .
Okay I agree Islam was not spread by the sword and I also agree killing is Haram in all the scriptures sent so far then why did the prophets were carrying sword? Were they going against their own scriptures?
If someone commit murder in front of you Won't you stop?
Shivaji Mahaj ReBirth Hinduism And Hinduism is Root of India . Tree can Be Cutted But It Regrows With Its Root .
So was Christianity
Islam did not spread by sword. It's not possible to persecute and spread religion forcefully. The Roman's tried against Christians and they failed miserably.
As for politics, all empires spread by sword. Even Christianity such as Constantine and Charlemagne So what if Islam did that?
This is pure islamaphobia.
@@MustafaAli-lb8dq Islam was spread by sword. You can think what you want I don't care you're not going to change my mind
@@johnmac1597 One of the largest muslim conversion happened after 9/11. Was it spread by sword?
I am not asking you to change your mind. You can't convince an ignorant person.
We will keep growing. Inshallah!
Because this was told in our Hadiths of the end times that Islam will become the no. 1 religion that's why there is so much hate and propaganda. ✌😁
Alhamdullilah
Tipu sent a letter on 19 January 1790 to the Governor of Bekal (near Kasaragod), Budruz Zuman Khan. It says:
"Don't you know I have achieved a great victory recently in Malabar and over four lakh Hindus were converted to Islam? I am determined to march against that cursed Raman Nair (Rajahof Travancore) very soon. Since I am overjoyed at the prospect of converting him and his subjects to Islam, I have happily abandoned the idea of going back to Srirangapatanam now."[83]
Now don't say that shit that he gave money to temple and build many temples he was a Wolf and wanted support for ruling on hindu subjects as they can revolt against him . You all are following true islam as it is clearly mentioned in hadis about GAZZVA- E - HIND and converting all other religions into islam .
I dont know who you are, but you miss understood Islam .You called Prophet with his nam.The whole muslim worlds know how the Prophet Muhammed Musthafa swallallahu Alaihivasallam was respected by the almighty Allahu subhanahu thahala.Prophet Muhammed Musthafa swallallahu Alaihivasallam fought in wars but it is waged only for their existance.You told Usman, Abubacker, Umar Raliyallahu Anhuma as brutal killers.But after accepting Islam they were all changed .They were became great model.
How do you know this you are a foolish person and totaly ignorent about islamic history.try learn first
Yes
Persecution of Egyptian Christians, however, reached a peak in the early Mamluk period following the Crusader wars. Some forced conversions of Christians were reported. Monasteries were occasionally raided and destroyed.
Between 1250 and 1517, the Egyptians who remained Christians experienced their most difficult period of persecution. The dictatorial Turkish Mamluk rulers forced Christians into degrading positions, such as riding their donkeys backwards and wearing bells around their necks. Their homes were frequently looted, and they experienced oppression by Muslim princes all over the country. Yet throughout centuries of persecution, the Egyptian church and its people survived. The Copts' professional talents as bookkeepers, administrators, architects, doctors, and craftsmen made them an indispensable part of Egypt's economy and government.
Copts suffered persecution and violence since the musllim conquest and still do today
yup my friend but they suffer intimidation and rejection and a lot are leaving egypt because they are not treated fairly.
Khalifa Alenezi The population of the Copts decreased from 9 million at the time of the Arabs conquest 641 A. D. approximately 700,000 at the early 1900's.
This is a stat i was trying to find
Khalifa Alenezi You prob wont read all of that but may Allah open your eyes brother
Here is a partial record of mohammed's humanity.
MUHAMMAD IN MECCA
Muhammad ordered the execution of 10 people when he took Mecca. Here is the list of names found in Ibn Sa’d “Tabaqat”.
The quote is from the Tabaqat, Vol 2, page 168.
“The apostle of Allah entered through Adhakhir, [into Mecca], and prohibited fighting. He ordered six men and four women to be killed, they were (1) Ikrimah Ibn Abi Jahl, (2) Habbar Ibn al-Aswad, (3) Abd Allah Ibn Sa’d Ibn Abi Sarh, (4) Miqyas Ibn Sababah al-Laythi, (5) al-Huwayrith Ibn Nuqaydh, (6) Abd Abbah Ibn Hilal Ibn Khatal al-Adrami, (7) Hind Bint Utbah, (8) Sarah, the mawlat (enfranchised girl) of Amr Ibn Hashim, (9) Fartana and (10) Qaribah.
Occasionally, the Sirat, and the Tabaqat use a different name for the same person. #3 in the list given above is such a case. The differences in the name is due to the amount of family lineage given for the man’s name, and the English translation.
Let’s start with #3 in the list. The Sirat corroborates the Tabaqat’s list, a few at a time. And the Sirat gives much more detail concerning #3. You’ll see that in the end, this man was almost executed, but he got lucky because Muhammad’s men couldn’t read Muhammad’s mind! This case will give you a glimpse into how Muhammad’s mind worked.
QUOTING FROM THE SIRAT, PAGE 550.
“The apostle had instructed his commanders when they entered Mecca only to fight those who resisted them, except a small number who were to be killed even if they were found beneath the curtains of the Kaba. Among them was Abdullah Sa’d, brother of the B. Amir Luayy. The reason he ordered him to be killed was that he had been a Muslim and used to write down revelation; then he apostatized and returned to Quraysh [Mecca] and fled to Uthman Affan whose foster brother he was. The latter hid him until he brought him to the apostle after the situation in Mecca was tranquil, and asked that he might be granted immunity. They allege that the apostle remained silent for a long time till finally he [Muhammad] said yes [granting Abdullah immunity from the execution order].
When Uthman had left he [Muhammad] said to his companions who were sitting around him, “I kept silent so that one of you might get up and strike off his head!” One of the Ansar said, “Then why didn’t you give me a sign, O apostle of God?” He answered that a prophet does not kill by pointing.”
Ibn Sa’d corroborates Ibn Ishaq and says on page 174:
“A person of al-Ansar had taken a vow to kill Ibn Abi Sarh [the already mentioned Abdullah] if he saw him. Uthman whose foster brother he (Ibn Abi Sarh) was, came and interceded for him with the prophet. The Ansari was waiting for the signal of the prophet to kill him. Uthman interceded and he [Muhammad] let him go. The apostle of Allah said to the Ansari, “Why did you not fulfil your vow?” He said, “O apostle of Allah! I had my hand on the hilt of the sword waiting for your signal to kill him. The prophet said signalling would have been a breach of faith. It does not behoove the prophet to make signal.””
DISCUSSION
Okay lets examine this one. Abdullah Sa’d used to write down Muhammad’s revelations, i.e., the Qur’an. Later, he apostatized, left Islam, and went back to Mecca. As Muhammad took Mecca, he gave a general amnesty, except for a number of people. Abdullah Sa’d is the first of this group mentioned. Muhammad ordered that Abdullah be killed.
Ali Dashti provides additional comments. I do not have all of the source references Dashti had, but this will give you more insight into the reason Muhammad ordered Abdullah killed.
From Ali Dashti’s “23 Years, A study of the prophetic career of Muhammad”, page 98.
“The last man named [in the list of people to be killed] had been one of the scribes employed at Medina to write down the ‘revelations’. On a number of occasions, with Muhammad’s consent, he changed the closing words of verses. For example, when Muhammad said “And God is mighty and wise”, Abdullah Sarh suggested ‘knowing and wise’, and the prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Abdullah renounced Islam on the ground that the revelations, if from God, could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy, he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.”
So you see the background behind the order to murder Abdullah. He was a threat to the credibility of the Qur’an. He was a Muslim, worked with Muhammad in writing down the Qur’an, and, from time to time he suggested some minor changes. Finally Abdullah realized that if this were truly from God, no changes would be made at the suggestion of a mere scribe. So, he surmised Islam was false, and went back to Mecca. After Muhammad took Mecca, and issued the order to kill him, Abdullah hid out with Uthman who was one of Muhammad’s closest companions. Later Abdullah pled for amnesty. Muhammad wanted one of his men to kill him on the spot, but they didn’t know, because they couldn’t read Muhammad’s mind. in the end, Muhammad gave Abdullah amnesty.
Note here that Ibn Hisham notes [note #803] that Abdullah became a Muslim again, and obtained a political position in time. This was a case of “If you can’t beat em, join em.”
Muslims may say, Muhammad ordered him to be killed, but Muhammad accepted his repentance and let him live.’ This is beside the point. Muhammad really wanted him to die, it just didn’t happen the way Muhammad wanted.
Muhammad issues an edict to have a man executed, but fails to have it carried out (he doesn’t want to make a signal with his hand?)
This man committed no major crime. Muhammad wanted this man killed for personal reasons. it appears that people lived or died depending on Muhammad’s frame of mind.
---------------------------
So far, we have examined one execution order. Muhammad ordered that Abdullah be executed, but Abdullah got lucky because Muhammad’s men were not mind readers.
0 for 1.
---------------------------
Now lets go on with the Sirat, picking up where I left off on page 550.
“Another [to be killed] was Abdullah Khatal of B. Taym b. Ghalib. He had become a Muslim and the apostle sent him to collect the poor tax in company with one of the Ansar. He had with him a freed slave who served him. (He was Muslim). When they halted he ordered the latter to kill a goat for him and prepare some food, and went to sleep. When he woke up the man had done nothing, so he attacked and killed him and apostatized. He had two singing-girls Fartana and her friend who used to sing satirical songs about the apostle, so Muhammad ordered that they should be killed with Abdullah Khatal.”
Let’s stop here and examine this paragraph. Muhammad ordered that a man who apostasized, and his two slave girls, be killed. Khatal was ordered to be killed not because he killed his male slave, a Muslim, but because he apostasized. Islamic law does not allow a Muslim man to be put to death for killing a slave. Muhammad also ordered two slave girls to be killed for singing satirical songs about him. Remember, they sung these songs about Muhammad years earlier. Now it's payback time. These slave girls were not threats to Muhammad, or to the new Islamic state. They were only slave girls. They were ordered to be executed simply because they sang a silly song about Muhammad.
Note here that Khatal is #6 in Ibn Sa’d’s list.
Now I will give you the info from Ibn Sa’d’s book on Khatal, Vol 2, page 172 and on. I will not type out the chain of narrators.
p172:
“The apostle of Allah entered Makkah in the year of victory and on his head there was a helmet. Then he removed it. Ma’n and Musa Ibn Dawud said in their version: A person came to him and said, “O apostle of Allah! Ibn Khatal is holding fast the curtains of al-Kabah. Thereupon the apostle of Allah said: “Kill him.”
p173:
“….kill him wherever you find him”
Now then on to Bukhari’s Hadith about Khatal, volume 5 #582.
“Narrated Anas bin Malik: “On the day of the Conquest, the prophet entered Mecca, wearing a helmet on his head. When he took it off, a man came and said, “Ibn Khatal is clinging to the curtain of the Kaba.” The prophet said “Kill him.”
Khatal was not as fortunate as Abdullah. Ibn Sa’d says on page 174:
“Verily the apostle of Alah ordered (his followers) on the day of the Victory to kill Ibn Abi Sarh, Fartana Ibn al-Zibr’ra and Ibn Khatal. Abu Barzah came and saw him (Ibn Khatal) holding fast the curtains of al-Kabah. He (Abu Barzah) ripped open his belly.
Okay, now we have a man who only apostasized from Islam executed.
1 for 2.
---------------------------
Jumping ahead to page 551 of the Sirat to finish the story of the slave girls.
“As for Ibn Khatal’s two singing girls, one was killed and the other slave girl ran away. however later she asked the apostle for immunity, Muhammad gave it to her.”
---------------------------
One of the slave girls escapes, the other is executed. Later, the living slave girl begs forgiveness, and is forgiven. Again, this shows that Muhammad’s death sentences were somewhat arbitrary. They mocked him, they paid (one with her life). As Muhammad felt more secure, he forgave the remaining slave girl.
2 for 4.
---------------------------
On page 551 of the Sirat:
“Another was al-Huwayrith Nuqaydh Wahb Qusayy, one of those who used to insult Muhammad in Mecca. … Al-Huwayrith was killed by Ali. [Ali was Muhammad’s son in law.]
What do you see here? This guy was murdered because he insulted Muhammad! Ibn Hisham notes [804] that Huwayrith goaded a camel that two of Muhammad’s children were riding on. So, years later, he paid with his life.
3 for 5.
---------------------------
Continuing on page 551 of the Sirat:
“Another [ordered to be killed] was Miqyas Hubaba because he had killed an Ansari who had killed his brother accidentally, and returned to Quraysh as a polytheist.”
There is a reference to this on page 492:
“Miqyas Subaba came from Mecca as a Muslim, so he professed, saying, “I come to you as a Muslim seeking the bloodwit for my brother who was killed in error.” The apostle ordered that he should have the bloodwit for his brother Hisham and he stopped a short while with the apostle. Then he attacked his brother’s slayer and killed him and went off to Mecca an apostate.”
This guy evidently became a Muslim and wanted revenge on the man who had accidentlay killed his brother. Muhammad allowed him to take his revenge. Miqyas then killed the other Muslim who accidently killed his brother. He then left Islam as an apostate and returned to Mecca. Since the penalty for leaving Islam is death, Muhammad had him killed.
4 for 6.
---------------------------
Continuing on page 551 of the Sirat we read about Sara and Ikrima:
“And Sara, freed slave of one of the Abdul-Muttalib [a tribe], and Ikrima Abu Jahl. Sara had insulted him [Muhammad] in Mecca. As for Ikrima, he fled to the Yaman. His wife Umm Hakim Harith Hisham became a Muslim and asked for immunity for him and the apostle gave it. She went to the Yaman in search of him and brought him to the apostle and he accepted Islam.” …
Sara, who lived until in the time of `Umar a mounted soldier trod her down in the valley of Mecca and killed her. Al-Huwayrith was killed by `Ali.”
She was seemingly given immunity at the time, after Muhammad was more secure, but she is later killed nevertheless. The text gives too little detail. Was her death just an accident? Usually people don’t die from accidentally being hit by the hoof of a horse or camel. This looks intentional, run over and then finished off, probably by the sword. She is killed and al-Huwayrith is killed. The construction of the two sentences in sequence is parallel and it gives the impression to be in consequence of Muhammad’s earlier command.
Al-Tabari’s text (“The History of Tabari”, volume 8, SUNY, translated by Michael Fishbein, p. 179) states about this incident:
“She lived until someone in the time of Umar b. al-Khattab caused his horse to trample her at Abtah and killed her.
This confirms that this death was not an accident. It is again not stated why she was killed, but it is likely that her earlier songs against Muhammad are part of the ultimate reason for it.
5 (4) for 8.
For a side note, there is a hadith narrated by ‘Ikrima, Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57:
Narrated ‘Ikrima:
Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to ‘Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn ‘Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostle forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).’ I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'”
---------------------------
From Ibn Sa’d’s list, #2 is probably the man mentioned in Bukhari, Vol. 5, Book 59, #662 and Volume 4, Book 56, #817. Habbar Ibn al-Aswad b. Ka`b al-`Ansi. He was murdered in Yemen.
In Sirat Rasul Allah, page 648, the section heading is: “… and Al-Aswad Al-`Ansi” and in the text he is called: al-Aswad b. Ka`b al-`Ansi. This makes the connection of “al-`Ansi” in the Hadith with al-Aswad in Ibn Sa`d likely.
6 (5) for 9.
---------------------------
Number 7 on Ibn Sa’d’s list was Hind bint Utbah. She was Abu Sufyan’s wife. Dashti notes that Muhammad had earlier ordered Sufyan to be killed. Sufyan was a leader in Mecca. He fought against Muhammad in battle. Just before Muhammad took Mecca, Sufyan went out to Muhammad and was coerced into accepting Islam, or be killed. Sufyan accepted Islam. Afterwards, Hind bint Utbah accepted Islam and was spared. Hind had previously desecrated dead Muslim bodies after the battle of Uhud. She even cut the liver out of one dead Muslim and took a bite of it, and spit it out. She also mocked Muhammad and the other defeated Muslims as they left the field.
She asked forgivness and was forgiven.
6 (5) for 10.
---------------------------
SUMMARY
We see that some of these people were killed simply because they had rejected Muhammad or mocked him. Other’s were ordered to be executed because they had left Islam. Most of these people never lifted a weapon against Muhammad.
---------------------------
That’s it for Ibn Sa’d’s list of people Muhammad orderd killed when he took Mecca. But there are a number of people who were put to the sword at Muhammad’s command Prior Muhammad taking Mecca.
+you ssef That's a lot of words ya got there, why don't you - Big Champ - go ask that to Dr. Zakir himself? Instead of poorly educated Muslims on RUclips. This is - in the end - an entertainment site, not a religious one, you could expect all kinds of society levels, as you already know, my self am not a greatly educated Muslims (sadly), but if you ask Dr. Zakir Nay'ek instead of throwing accusations and words from behind your screen, I'm sure you will get a satisfying reply.
حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل في الكذابين وياريت نفتكر المعلم يعقوب الخاين اللي انضم للحملة الفرنسية ونفتكر من قبل كده لما الاريوسين كانوا محبوسين ومضطهدين من المسيحيين الآخرين وفي فتح مصر عمرو بن العاص اطلق سراحهم لكنهم أخذوا بثارهم منكم فاوقف عمرو هذه الأعمال وحماكم منهم
Even if islam promotes violence, I'm happy with it. Alteast our so called violent behaviour prevented the britishers from ruling on us unlike the so called non-violent hindus who were first ruled by mughals and then by the britishers.
@@suhassreehari876 useless
Alexander conquered Persia 2000 years ago
Ma-sha-Allah
Maummad jamil
slam not spread by he sword?
Hmm ... let's see
Battle of Ajnadayn (634)
Battle of Badr (624)
Battle of Bosra (634)
Battle of Fahl (635)
Battle of Hunayn (630)
Battle of the Iron Bridge (637)
Battle of Marj Rahit (634)
Conquest of Mecca (629-630)
Battle of Uhud (625)
Battle of Yarmouk (636)
Battle of Al-Anbar (633)
Battle of al-Qadisiyyah (636)
Battle of Ayn al-Tamr
(633)
Battle of Badghis (654)
Battle of Babylon (634)
Battle of Babylon (636)
(2nd one)
Battle of Bishapur (643-644)
Battle of Kaskar (634)
Battle of Namaraq (634)
Battle of Al Madhar (633)
Battle of Bayrudh (643-644)
Battle of Bosra (634)
Battle of al-Jisr (634)
Battle of Burs (636)
Battle of Buwaib (634)
Battle of Buzakha (632)
Battle of the Camel (656)
Battle of Chains (633)
Battle of Dathin (634)
Battle of Dawmat al-Jandal (633)
Battle of Dibba (632-634)
Battle of Firaz (634)
First Battle of Dongola (642)
Battle of Ghamra
Battle of Hazir (637)
Battle of Sanita-al-Uqab (637)
Battle of Heliopolis (640)
Battle of Hira (633)
Battle of Jalula (637)
Battle of Maraj-al-Debaj (634)
Battle of Marj Rahit (634)
Battle of Muzayyah (633)
Muslim conquest of Khorasan (651)
Battle of Nahavand (642)
Battle of Nahrawan (659)
Battle of Naqra (633)
Battle of Nikiou (646)
Battle of Nishapur (652)
Battle of Oxus River (651)
Battle of Rasil (644)
Battle of Ray (651)
Battle of Saniyy
(633)
Battle of Siffin (657)
Battle of Spahan (642)
Battle of Sufetula (647)
Battle of Ullais (633)
Battle of Waj Rudh (642-643)
Battle of Walaja (633)
Battle of Yamama (632)
Battle of Yarmouk (636)
Battle of Zafar (632)
Battle of Zhu Qissa (632)
Battle of Zumail (633)
Battle of Akroinon (740)
Battle of Aksu (717)
Battle of Ayn al-Warda (685)
Battle of Bagdoura (741)
Battle of the Baggage (737)
Battles of Bajarwan (730-731)
Battle of al-Harra (683)
Battle of Khazir (686)
Battle of Baykand (729)
Battle of Carthage (698)
Battle of Covadonga (718/722)
Battle of Dayr al-Jamajim (701)
Battle of the Defile (731)
Battle of Karbala (680)
Battle of Kharistan (737)
Battle of Mommy (690)
Battle of Marj Ardabil (730)
Battle of Marj Rahit (684)
Battle of Machine (691)
Battle of the Nobles (740)
Battle of the River Berre (737)
Battle of the River Garonne (732)
Battle of Sebastopolis (692)
Also learn why the battles took place
Know the reasons behind those battle....
literally only 7 of those were actual fights all of which were in self-defence
2:10
2:30
Wtf is he even talking? Kithna jhoot bol raha hai ye bandha... You people destroyed many Hindu temple,killed millions of hindus,Killed a guru of Sikhs Guru gobindh ji who refused to convert to Islam,You killed a maratha king to convert to Islam...There are heck lot of proofs over the internet. 80% of Indians are non Muslims because our Warriors like Shivaji Maharaj fought back,the marathas fought back. Non Muslims were imposed heavy taxes under your rule. What would they do without converting to this religion? It's soooooo funny that your asking proofs that Islam didn't cause death to other religions in India and world.
The moguls did kill whoever didn’t convert
what???
Yeah by that logic Hindus should even exist in india
@@bilalahmed-bu7bi Do you even know the story?
Ya This is why We Muslims are 80% & huindus are only 20% remaining in india🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@Asif1998 wow ever heard greater india?
They killed many as they can but it is only 40% successful as population of greaterindia is huge
Go and read what swami Vivekananda says
😭😭😭💪🏼❤️❤️❤️
Read stories of guru teg bahadur char sahibjade see the sale of hindu girls sold on 1-2 rs
Even today see many peoples giving money for converting hindu girls
Sambhaji Maharaj son of Shivaji Maharaj was captured by Aurangzeb and asked him to convert to Islam, but he refused. Hot rods were inserted into his eyes, nails pulled out, skin peeled off. He was tied to a pole and anyone could come and chop his flesh to feed a dog but he was a lion. Sambhaji was hesitant to die. For 40 long days, he sustained. He continued breathing through that 40 days for his people. Last day Aurangzeb again asked him to accept Islam. He roared and said not even if you offer your daughter to me. He was cut into pieces and thrown in the Bhima river. This is how Hindu Dharma survived. Even though Islamic oppression was trying to convert Hinduism stood firm. Zakir Naik this story of yours is trying to undo history. Stop telling lies.
No he was killed due to other reason. Aurangzeb said he should plead to him to save him lmeans saving him from punishment. Brave sambhaji maharaj disagreed. That is why he was punished
Also don't lie
Khalid ibn Walid says yes. Now pay the jizya or convert.
Jizya is tax same as muslim give zakat both will give 2.5 of their income.
Olaf is misinformed
@Sunny 1 that's not true , infact Muslim pays more tax than non Muslims who lived in Muslim lands , so stop lying and tell the truth
Jizay is for non Muslim for not accepting islam
Assalamualaikum
Hame ye speech likhkar chahiye
Mashaallh bahot achhi lagi hame ,aap agar hame de tou meharbani hogi..
Jaar
Fun fact sword is not mentioned once in the Quran
Yes it was ! Why you have to be in defensive mode ! Dude come on !
“We Muslim ruled India about 1000 years” 😂😂😂😂 Which history book he reads?
please educate you self and read about the muslim mongols🤗🤗
coolics-creatoon Educate me about their Kingdoms. Educate me about the time they ruled over entire India i.e. Indian sub continent, educate me about the area they covered under their rule.
@@srujalasari use youtube. it's a good website🤗
😍😍❤
Islam spread properly at the prophet Muhammad SAW time but the Mughals were bad they killed non Muslims for no reason😪