Siskel & Ebert Review The Abyss Special Edition (1993) James Cameron

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
  • DISCLAIMER: I do not own any of the footage I used. Copyrights belong to their respective owners. This video is covered by "fair use".
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 48

  • @jedijones
    @jedijones 2 года назад +23

    Damn, I guess I need to start getting into LaserDiscs.

    • @LukeLovesRose
      @LukeLovesRose Год назад +3

      LMAO. No. Wait for Cameron to release this underrated gem on Blu-ray.

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад +1

      @@LukeLovesRose Well...we're waiting!

  • @drewlovelyhell4892
    @drewlovelyhell4892 Год назад +8

    I'm glad they liked it. Saves me having to exhume them and beat them up! The Abyss is one of my most favourite films. It's arguable that the theatrical cut was somewhat of a halfway measure. They could have made a shorter film about a tense underwater rescue and climactic battle against a rogue Navy Seal, without all the Alien stuff, or focus more on the cold-war/alien interaction aspect like the Special Edition.
    As usual with Cameron films, longer is usually better. "20 miles of rough road" as he says.

    • @qtrfoil
      @qtrfoil 9 месяцев назад

      Cameron is Canadian. "20 hard miles" is a common hockey reference to a tough/hard-worked 20-minute period in a game.

  • @charlesbell74
    @charlesbell74 Год назад +6

    LaserDisc technology!! :)

    • @LukeLovesRose
      @LukeLovesRose Год назад

      Getting this on Laserdisc was a dream. I was already such a fan

  • @protiliusproductions
    @protiliusproductions 5 месяцев назад

    Hi, we’re gonna review this movie again, and then play all of the extra footage so you don’t have to watch it again.

  • @simian01
    @simian01 2 года назад +17

    I’m glad the special edition won Siskel over on the NTI portion of the story.

  • @rickleemusic1
    @rickleemusic1 2 года назад +16

    I miss Siskel & Ebert.

  • @michaelperkowski641
    @michaelperkowski641 2 года назад +10

    I like this version of The Abyss much better. The special effects are really more incredible then 1989 film. I agree with Siskel and Ebert on Special Edition of The Abyss.

  • @viarnay
    @viarnay Год назад +4

    The Abyss was badly butchered on its theater version

  • @steveb0503
    @steveb0503 Год назад +4

    SUCH a better version - I won't even watch the theatrical cut!

  • @michaelperkowski641
    @michaelperkowski641 Год назад +8

    The 4K and Blu ray of The Abyss is coming this march. James Cameron over see the digital transfer of film.

    • @LukeLovesRose
      @LukeLovesRose Год назад +2

      I cant wait

    • @chrisk5204
      @chrisk5204 Год назад +1

      It's almost March with no word on it.

    • @michaelperkowski641
      @michaelperkowski641 Год назад +1

      @@chrisk5204 I think it's been push back til Avatar the way water comes out on Blu ray there also releasing True Lies and Titanic 35 anniversary as well so the wait is little longer then I was told.

    • @Victory-in-YAHUSHA
      @Victory-in-YAHUSHA Год назад +1

      I've never watched The Abyss before. Always passed it up. Would be happy to watch the Special Edition in 4K.

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад

      March I can believe. WHICH March is the question.

  • @lpquagmire3621
    @lpquagmire3621 Год назад +6

    They cut the most important scene in the movie.

    • @LukeLovesRose
      @LukeLovesRose Год назад +1

      Cameron doesnt snip a shot here or there. He cuts entire subplots. It's like pulling the threads of a quilt

  • @RoyalBlue43
    @RoyalBlue43 9 месяцев назад +3

    Nice job cutting the newer looking footage w the original Siskel and Ebert footage. Its so clean that you don't realize how well you've done it

  • @GatorMcKluskyRules
    @GatorMcKluskyRules 9 месяцев назад +2

    nice job with this presentation

  • @markmoreno7295
    @markmoreno7295 2 месяца назад +1

    I would have loved a different idea. Aliens in as much as are any undiscovered species, so fragile they must live well away from us, intelligent but in ways we cannot understand. Sure they could have helped Ed to the surface so that the rescue vessle could have picked him up, maybe on the back of a whale or some other natural way. No one would believe him and that way the species remained undetected, like bigfoot or Nessy. No big shaking of a finger towards mankind to shape up, but then, how valuable is their ability to communicate with people or sea creatures. And why didn't Ed ever take his weights off? Maybe that could have been the opportunity to show us that they were intelligent. They could have taken the weights off for him. I am no big director so it is just an idea.

  • @vivaciousom5347
    @vivaciousom5347 9 месяцев назад +3

    December 6 2023-one night only event at the theatre. Definitely going to experience this movie. I remember seeing this in 1989 when it was new and it was so gorgeous to look it.

  • @GringoLatino941
    @GringoLatino941 8 месяцев назад +1

    WTF HAPPENED TO MY COMMENT. I typed it and disappeared so had to write one again. NOW: i own the laserdisc version; longer version much better. Sound and picture were great; I am getting the 4k in March. I still liked the movie in 1989 as I saw it with a black woman I was dating at the time; we both loved it. BUT longer version is THE BEST. I also own the dvd.

  • @stevencoardvenice
    @stevencoardvenice Месяц назад +1

    I've only scene the full versions of aliens and the abyss. No other version would make any sense

  • @georgeharris9873
    @georgeharris9873 9 месяцев назад +2

    I previously had this director's cut on Laserdisc 30 years ago in 1993. It definately is the superb version. i can't wait to get the up-coming 4-K Super High Definition Blu-ray in March.

    • @JasonBagherian
      @JasonBagherian  9 месяцев назад +1

      I still have the CAV Laserdisc of The Abyss 😀

  • @Durwood71
    @Durwood71 6 месяцев назад +1

    Imagine if Siskel and Ebert had lived to see the new 4K release. They would have been astounded.

  • @selcuk1479
    @selcuk1479 10 месяцев назад +2

    Studio cut these scene because it was "too political" for them...

    • @Durwood71
      @Durwood71 6 месяцев назад +1

      Not true. Cameron chose to cut it himself in order to shorten the run time, because in 1989, a film that ran over two hours was considered a financial risk.

  • @two_owls
    @two_owls 8 месяцев назад +1

    People gotta get on that LaserDisk technology!

  • @shijoejoseph2011
    @shijoejoseph2011 11 месяцев назад +2

    I hope they release its 4K and Blu-ray this year! How long must fans of the extended cut wait?!

    • @hankforeman91
      @hankforeman91 10 месяцев назад +1

      Just one more month!

    • @shijoejoseph2011
      @shijoejoseph2011 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@hankforeman91 yes, the limited run in theatres is due in December. Hopefully, they would release the 4k and blu-ray box this Christmas without anymore delays. I hope to God they leave alone film grain and classic 24 frames per second frame rate the way they be! 😭❤️

  • @zt1053
    @zt1053 21 день назад

    So sad Gene died when DVD's started to take off.

  • @ahsenkhan5386
    @ahsenkhan5386 6 месяцев назад

    They didn;t mention about the man pully the other guy pants down ?

  • @LukeLovesRose
    @LukeLovesRose Год назад +3

    These guys took forever to see and appreciate the work of James Cameron. I wonder what they would say about The Way of Water

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад

      Ebert would give it 3.5 stars.

    • @LukeLovesRose
      @LukeLovesRose Год назад +1

      @@jedijones Out of 4? Maybe

    • @tronam
      @tronam Год назад +1

      Ebert gave Avatar (2009) 4/4 stars, so I suspect he would've rated TWOW pretty highly. Unlike many other critics he understood and appreciated how diverse the cinematic language can be. He could love small, character dramas where the narrative is almost completely driven by dialogue, but also equally appreciate the experiential visual storytelling of James Cameron or George Lucas films.

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад

      @@tronam Right, but he argued pretty hard that Avatar should not be considered for Best Picture. And 3 or 3.5 stars was given to a lot of mega blockbusters in the 2000s, like Avengers, Dark Knight Rises and Revenge of the Sith, or sometimes less, as with Spider-Man 1 and 3, Attack of the Clones and War of the Worlds. Ultimately, Avatar 2 is a ton of set-up for a story that isn't resolved at all in this movie. Ebert favored movies with complete stories, not ones that were constantly talking about the past chapter and teasing future chapters. He didn't give a Harry Potter movie 4 stars after the first two. And none of the LOTR movies got 4 stars.

    • @tronam
      @tronam Год назад +1

      @@jedijones I wonder what he'd think of current day MCU, now 31 movies deep. Everything feels like a setup for more setups now.

  • @345mrse
    @345mrse 2 года назад +2

    That's just so swell of this aquatic alien species. To encounter a species of homicidal blunt-skulls and warn them about self preservation rather than just appropriating a planet which is mostly covered by the alien's liquid metier. Hunh.