A Revolution in Poetry: Wordsworth and Coleridge, 1798 - James Chandler

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 окт 2024

Комментарии • 39

  • @ravenoversnow
    @ravenoversnow 10 лет назад +29

    Past comments are off-base: this lecture is neither boring nor poorly delivered. Rather, it is well thought-out, carefully worded, with a balance of general comments/points and particular pursuits of interests (e.g. Hart Leap well). I've actually gone back and watched this a couple of times...

  • @lyrical9582
    @lyrical9582 4 года назад +9

    Great points in the lecture:
    'Innovations of the past become woodwork of the present'. 3.33
    'Cliches and lost codes (loss of context)

  • @NM-yv7mr
    @NM-yv7mr 9 лет назад +20

    Excellent lecture Professor Chandler, thank you.

  • @tattoofthesun
    @tattoofthesun 5 лет назад +5

    Well spoken with a general audience in mind

  • @rossbaglin5872
    @rossbaglin5872 6 лет назад +10

    An excellent, erudite and useful lecture, which allowed me to approach these poems with receptiveness and better understanding.

  • @PoisonelleMisty4311
    @PoisonelleMisty4311 4 года назад +5

    God bless your heart whoever recorded or filmed this, you're saved me four hours of mad literature essay.

    • @hazelwray4184
      @hazelwray4184 Год назад +1

      'you've'
      'essay writing'

    • @PoisonelleMisty4311
      @PoisonelleMisty4311 Год назад +2

      @@hazelwray4184 Yes, I had an essay work, and the teacher failed me more than 20 times. She never gave me feedback, so I had to figure everything out on my own. She was ruthless and did not show me empathy; she made me furious, and other kids grew upset and depressed as a result. One of her students was yelling at the bus stop, "should I take suicide?" and was calmed down by a kind female student. I still think about it to this day; the memory of that sad youngster tears my heart and makes me wonder how much easier his life would have been if he had a compassionate teacher. Her stance was that "I'm merely following the learning objectives," and if you couldn't complete them, she would fail you. She didn't educate us anything or teach us how to write an essay in her lectures. I'm pleased there are kind individuals out there who care about other people. This video was really beneficial and saved my life. ❤😔🙏🌻

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 Год назад +5

    In the realm of verse, a revolution arose,
    Wordsworth and Coleridge, their poetry shows,
    In seventeen hundred and ninety-eight's prime,
    Two minds entwined in rhythm and rhyme.
    The University of Chicago's halls,
    James Chandler's wisdom, the era recalls,
    In scholarly tomes, their spirits reside,
    The poets' visions, their passion, their stride.
    Wordsworth, nature's bard, in golden light,
    Coleridge, with dreams that took to flight,
    Lyrical ballads, a joint venture born,
    Their words a chorus, a poetic horn.
    Chandler's insights, a scholarly gaze,
    Unraveling the poets' innovative phase,
    In pages turned, their brilliance found,
    In academic pursuit, their voices resound.
    The Prelude, a reflection of life's grandeur,
    Lyrical verses, emotions they stir,
    From Chicago's walls to distant shores,
    Their legacy, an eternal encore.
    Wordsworth's landscapes, the sublime's embrace,
    Coleridge's dreams, a mystical space,
    Their words, a revolution, an art's decree,
    A testament to time's poetic spree.
    In the scholarly realm, Chandler's pen,
    Unveiling the poets, once again,
    Their revolution, their artful flight,
    In history's pages, shining bright.
    The University of Chicago's learned voice,
    Echoes of revolution, a poetic choice,
    A tribute to Wordsworth, Coleridge's lore,
    Their verses alive, forevermore.

  • @Pandeysirclasses547
    @Pandeysirclasses547 7 лет назад +3

    THANKS

  • @johnmartin2813
    @johnmartin2813 5 лет назад +2

    Coleridge was born in Ottery St Mary which is in Devon. He spent his first eight years in the country!

  • @literaturelessons5454
    @literaturelessons5454 3 года назад +1

    Very informative lecture.

  • @ElliotBrownJingles
    @ElliotBrownJingles 6 лет назад +1

    Brilliant!

  • @suhadhassan4369
    @suhadhassan4369 7 лет назад +3

    please ,what's the title of the bòok that prof was reading in?

  • @frenspanglish
    @frenspanglish 2 года назад

    Please tell me, what is the name of the book by using which, the teacher referred?

  • @md88kg
    @md88kg 9 месяцев назад

    There are people who actually HAVE to work to make a living.

  • @bellringer929
    @bellringer929 5 лет назад +2

    Why don't we admit that criticism is rarely more interesting than reading itself? Nothing against respected professor, but this one was too wide, too high.. 😞

    • @pookz3067
      @pookz3067 Год назад

      We don’t admit it because enough people obviously disagree, or they wouldn’t be doing it

  • @TheWhitehiker
    @TheWhitehiker 4 года назад +3

    Yeah, he's kind of boring, though handling an interesting topic.

  • @petercrossley1069
    @petercrossley1069 Год назад +1

    Stumbling delivery gets in the way of clarity. He is afraid to speak from the heart and reads his over-complex text.

    • @pookz3067
      @pookz3067 Год назад

      Typically if one writes, the written text is a better representation of the heart than speaking off the cuff. Viewing speaking off the cuff as being more “from the heart” is an egregious error that you should try not to commit in the future

  • @gnolan4281
    @gnolan4281 6 лет назад +5

    Sorry, but after I lost count of how many times he said "umm" I tuned out.

  • @crofton82
    @crofton82 10 лет назад +7

    What a terrible communicator....sincere apologies but this Professor is drab, unimaginative and English doesn't appear to be his first language.

    • @SerWhiskeyfeet
      @SerWhiskeyfeet 7 лет назад +1

      crofton82 Do you still stand by this after 3 years?

    • @rickbergolla4055
      @rickbergolla4055 5 лет назад

      @@SerWhiskeyfeet do you stand by that question 1 year later

    • @toomanydrugsinmysys5414
      @toomanydrugsinmysys5414 5 лет назад

      Your iq is probably ten at best

    • @aayushbaid2399
      @aayushbaid2399 2 года назад

      @@rickbergolla4055 Do you stand by your statement after 3 years ?

  • @malamati007
    @malamati007 10 лет назад +8

    Sorry, but this is really boring, and in no way conveys even a hint of a "revolution in poetry"!

    • @trevortalley5616
      @trevortalley5616 9 лет назад +15

      Then you didn't understand. That's fine. But the information is here.

    • @tattoofthesun
      @tattoofthesun 5 лет назад +2

      Maybe Allen Ginsberg is more exciting to you than the English romantics

  • @classicbib3225
    @classicbib3225 3 года назад +2

    Such dissection of the poetic genius is very un-poetic in its heart, scholarly approach ruins that unique mystery which is in Wordsworth. Professors should stop that nonsensical quest for objective analysis in arts and poetry.

    • @pookz3067
      @pookz3067 Год назад +1

      There’s no attempt to be poetic in the dissection of poetic genius, and nor should there be. I think you mean to say “it’s not for you,” because it clearly does not ruin it for everyone. Your way of enjoying Wordsworth has no inherent value above the professor’s. And to call this kind of analysis nonsensical is just pure ignorance.

  • @md88kg
    @md88kg 10 месяцев назад

    Someone should monitor these lecturers' ah'm count

  • @RobertJamesChinneryH
    @RobertJamesChinneryH 6 лет назад +1

    The guy has a big ego...shut it off

  • @JanetteHeffernan
    @JanetteHeffernan 4 года назад

    Ummm! What can one say? Good is not the word, perhaps?

  • @yashdeepsingh9785
    @yashdeepsingh9785 6 месяцев назад

    Very boring and useless lecture... Poor😮

  • @shangrila73eldorado
    @shangrila73eldorado 9 месяцев назад

    this guy is a god awful speaker