“Even though the new ones are insanely expensive” The new ones - $285.00 The Old ones -$980.00 Edit:I started a revolution in the replies Edit 2:How the f*ck did I get 15k likes
he said that because back when the old shoes were the norm it would be cheaper than the new Nike ones probably. What I mean is that when he bought it it was cheap. Anything that is old becomes a collectors item and goes higher in value the older is is.
@laworld9575 Your so stupid if you are running distance if run on the outer lanes you run father which makes your times slower. What your your saying only affects when you sprint
@@TheMMAKasual There's not one athletic endeavor you'd beat me in. How many marathons and 5 min miles are you currently running? Let's not even discuss intelligence. You probably shouldn't even talk when you do nothing in life. 🫢🤫🤡🤡🤡
Not really a fair test. For accurate results you would need both pairs brand new. Shoes aren't made for a lifetime that long. Any benefits that older shoe had are far gone. Plus you may have been unintentionally holding back as to not further damage the older shoe.
I mean it’s not really possible to get the old shoe in brand new conditions plus he got a person record in the alphaflys so obviously it had some benefits
@@alisong7120rather than spew a bunch of random opposition for shits and giggles I’m just going to say that was an excellent and logical point that had zero representation in the short making it perfectly logical comment.
Do your own tests and shut up. People always want to cry on someone's videos about utter nonsense. Either don't watch or st.fu, no one is interested. You act like anyone thinks these 2 shoes would ever be comparable.
I’m thinking about getting my brother shoes for track for his birthday. He has shoes now but they’re nothing special and probably don’t even help him. He’s a decent runner and can run a 6:25 miles with bad shoes so i want to get him some better ones for his birthday, I can’t wait to see what he’ll be able to do with them.
Back when I was in high school in 2015, I bought a re-release pair of Nike waffle racers from J-crew for I wanna say like 80 bucks? Honestly some of the best shoes I've ran in to this day and I set a bunch of PRs in them. The waffle traction works really well for off road races and they grip a track pretty well too and the upper feels soft and breathable. Totally recommend them to any runners or anyone that just wants a retro look.
Ngl running shoes make a world of difference I used to run in just regular sneakers nothing crazy just to and back from the gym a mile exactly, first time I wore running shoes I literally stayed on the trail to keep running an extra mile that’s how easy it felt haha
They literally do. It's like a mustang racing another mustang in a quarter mile race. One has brand new racing specific tires and the other is running stock all weathers. The one with the racing tires is going to vastly outperform the one running the all seasons.
@@Tom-vu1wr why don’t you see race cars using all weather tires? Why do they run specialized racing tires? Why are their suspensions specially tuned to racing? Because just slapping any tires and suspension on a car makes a huge difference in performance. Same with running shoes specifically designed for racing marathons
Back in 1974 if you were wearing a pair of LDV-1000 shoes by Nike strolling the halls at high school, you were walking on sunshine....too cool for words @ $40 per pair !
yeah the Nylon Nike Cortez , like on back to the Future, my favoite shoe fashion, but for running my favorite was the Nike Air Max, huge innovation 1987
Thing is they aren’t even made to make you go faster. They are just made more for comfortability when running let’s say a marathon. Which makes it even better. 😂
Coming from a college xc and track runner, that doesn’t really determine how fast you’ll run a mile. Sure trainers from 50 years ago might make a little difference than ones from today, but it mostly depends on your personal speed and your recent training. Also, you don’t need the most expensive ones, they do not guarantee you’ll run faster
I really wanted to buy the Fresh foam bb v2 but we dont have stocks here and it expensive in the website 😢.Great video as always tommy! Would you also be able to review the Anta zap 1? Thanks!
What I'd be more interested in knowing though is what kind of difference I might reasonably expect to see going from something like the Boston 12 to the Adios Pro 3. I'm not convinced I'd see any noticable difference, which has prevented me from spending the money on top end shoes, but maybe it would make a difference?
I’ve just started using running shoes with more technology built in them since I’m running for longer distances now. Before I only using older bare minimum style running sneakers (like the Onitsuka Tiger) as I was only running a max of 3-5 miles.
What difference does it make? A mile is a mile no matter where you run. If you can't figure out why one might run in outer lanes, then you probably don't understand physics and biomechanics.
@@Tritiuminducedfusion umm all my life I was taught that lane one was the shortest distance around the track, lane 7 is the longest distance and that’s why everyone always sticks to lane one in middle and long distance races
This experiment is flawed there no exact way to prove this claim as there’s no way to keep your running speed constant across two tests. Plus if you do so no matter the shoe or no shoe if you running at the same speed it doesn’t matter what you wear
The newer shoes are estimated to give a 4% boost of efficiency/running economy in elite runners. Someone not as fast may experience a slightly higher number, but it doesn't take a minute off your mile time. I have 2 different pairs of carbon plated shoes, and yes they help...but you don't just shave off minutes in a short race. They're actually more designed for road racing at slightly longer distances like half marathon and marathon. That's where you'll notice the biggest difference
if the old shoes were really made in 1973 and not just released in that year, than the physical age of the shoe itself definitely also plays a role. I wonder how the new ones will do in 50 years if you use that exact pair
People wouldn’t need to pay 300 dollars for shoes if they literally just ran with proper form and bought some minimalist shoes like Vibrams. *I said what I said*
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
“Even though the new ones are insanely expensive”
The new ones - $285.00
The Old ones -$980.00
Edit:I started a revolution in the replies
Edit 2:How the f*ck did I get 15k likes
he said that because back when the old shoes were the norm it would be cheaper than the new Nike ones probably. What I mean is that when he bought it it was cheap. Anything that is old becomes a collectors item and goes higher in value the older is is.
I came into the comments just to see if anyone said anything bout thst
Well yeah they’re 50 year old shoes
He’s talking about retail peice
there is only 2 zeros not three
those shoes are as old as my mom
Young ass mom, she single?
@adamis_3513 Tell your mother I say hello
adamis tell ur mom i said hello
Tell your mom I said hello
same bro
bro literally ran a mile in someone else’s shoes 💀
That’s kinda eBay for ya
@@Jesus_Loves_you2499ah hell nah
😂@@Jacobt26
bro
I see what you did there 😂 that’s tuff🔥
He said insanely expensive when the older ones were 3 time the price
No that’s just the price now because it’s rare but back then it was way less.
Still expensive@@yokme5442
@@yokme5442it was a joke
Thats still irrelevant. They were three times as expensive now. Back then this video wouldve never been made@yokme5442
@@Alien-Sharkcousin?
First shoes were 7:26 and newest shoes were 6:33
Not all hero’s wear capes
Are we really at the point where we have to spoil 1 minute videos because we can't watch the whole thing?
Not all capes wear heroes
Not capes wear all heroes
Heroes all capes wear not
Not running in lane one is wild
Complaining not running in the other lane is wild
Everything is "wild" to these Special Ed Gen Z's.
@@Tritiuminducedfusionjust say you’re old and bitter. You’d save time
@laworld9575 Your so stupid if you are running distance if run on the outer lanes you run father which makes your times slower. What your your saying only affects when you sprint
@@TheMMAKasual There's not one athletic endeavor you'd beat me in. How many marathons and 5 min miles are you currently running? Let's not even discuss intelligence. You probably shouldn't even talk when you do nothing in life. 🫢🤫🤡🤡🤡
Not really a fair test. For accurate results you would need both pairs brand new. Shoes aren't made for a lifetime that long. Any benefits that older shoe had are far gone. Plus you may have been unintentionally holding back as to not further damage the older shoe.
I mean it’s not really possible to get the old shoe in brand new conditions plus he got a person record in the alphaflys so obviously it had some benefits
@@hoyet5482 yes I realize that but I'm just pointing that out. When you walk with a glass cup vs plastic are you more cautious?
@@alisong7120 yes, your right but I think he probably understands that it wouldn’t be fair
@@alisong7120rather than spew a bunch of random opposition for shits and giggles I’m just going to say that was an excellent and logical point that had zero representation in the short making it perfectly logical comment.
Do your own tests and shut up. People always want to cry on someone's videos about utter nonsense. Either don't watch or st.fu, no one is interested. You act like anyone thinks these 2 shoes would ever be comparable.
Dad, you haven't walked a mile in my shoe
Their Shoe from 1973:
You'll stumble in my footsteps
Keep the same appointments I've kept dave ghan
Imagine rolling up with ur 1970's running shoes to your meet
Wild😅
About a whole minute difference? Seems like false advertising
Yeah thats bullshit
You should run in lane one
Well he didn't 💀
Hes running a mile, not a 1600
@@HollandBthere’s a starting point in lane one for the mile on conventional tracks.
@@HollandB how many meters in a mile big guy
@@n7clip1609
If anyone is wondering the new shoes are 500+ dollars in canadian currency
Really depends on how hard you try
“Wow 🤩These new shoes are insanely expensive”
Bro the old ones were 4 times more expensive
980 DOLLARS?!?!?!??
Michael storen fan 🤓
thats not even that expensive
@@brethazok bud
Dude runs faster in the old shoes than I would in those new shoes.
Is that a concrete track..
it might actually be one💀
could be hard rubber
@@thezeddyit can’t be it has cracks
This is rubber track
this was one of the best pods yet
I’m thinking about getting my brother shoes for track for his birthday. He has shoes now but they’re nothing special and probably don’t even help him. He’s a decent runner and can run a 6:25 miles with bad shoes so i want to get him some better ones for his birthday, I can’t wait to see what he’ll be able to do with them.
Middle schoolers laugh being able to run a mile in 4 minutes
Back when I was in high school in 2015, I bought a re-release pair of Nike waffle racers from J-crew for I wanna say like 80 bucks? Honestly some of the best shoes I've ran in to this day and I set a bunch of PRs in them. The waffle traction works really well for off road races and they grip a track pretty well too and the upper feels soft and breathable. Totally recommend them to any runners or anyone that just wants a retro look.
That’s a classic shoe. History
POV: SHOES IS RUNNING☠️
Him: “A new personal best of 6:33!”
Me: 😮💨💅 6:05. I’m not being cocky. I’m just happy that I’m better than someone.
The old shoes cost 900 dollars
Its not abt the shoes
Its abt skills
how can u consider this test reliable?
Exactly
is this a research paper or a RUclips short video? i too am confused like you
Idk about faster but definitely more comfortable
"They felt more light and nicer, although they are very expensive.."
*procceds tô buy the old ones for 980 dollars*
The first ones look like a shoe called the wolverine 3000
Why tf are you running in lane 4…
Lol ikr😅
why not?
@@gnrslash1987lane 4 is farther than lane 1 so he def ran further than a mile
Maybe lane 4 for four laps gives a mile?
@@Tom-vu1wr it doesn’t
You should do it again but in reverse order and compare the results.
That first one looked like the Giannis Zoom Freak 5
Damn the newer ones look so cool. Futuristic. Remember when Nike released the shock technology?
Is this indirectly an ad..😂
Ngl running shoes make a world of difference I used to run in just regular sneakers nothing crazy just to and back from the gym a mile exactly, first time I wore running shoes I literally stayed on the trail to keep running an extra mile that’s how easy it felt haha
Shoes don’t change a whole minute, you simply ran faster than before
They literally do. It's like a mustang racing another mustang in a quarter mile race. One has brand new racing specific tires and the other is running stock all weathers. The one with the racing tires is going to vastly outperform the one running the all seasons.
@@brandonb.5304r u taking the piss
@@brandonb.5304 it is a whole 15% time difference. I dont think he would go tuat much slower if he was wearung dress shoes
@@Tom-vu1wr why don’t you see race cars using all weather tires? Why do they run specialized racing tires? Why are their suspensions specially tuned to racing? Because just slapping any tires and suspension on a car makes a huge difference in performance. Same with running shoes specifically designed for racing marathons
@@brandonb.5304 why are you trying to compare cars and wearing shoes
Buddy said insanely expensive when the old ones are 4.5x more expensive
Bro got the shoes used💀
The fastest mile time for me was 6:15 it was for a grade if we get more time then our PR we fail if we get a new PR we pass
Insane how collectioner shoes from 70's are cheaper than some of there shoes
Insanely expensive when the first ones were 3x the price
Back in 1974 if you were wearing a pair of LDV-1000 shoes by Nike strolling the halls at high school, you were walking on sunshine....too cool for words @ $40 per pair !
In my 7th grade year, these Nike blue waffle trainers made you cool like the kids who sat in the back of the bus.
RUclips cant differentiate running disciplines, so I often find myself on distance runner pages in total confusion as to wth is going on 😂
i actually have a pair of the old ones, my dad still wears them
As a runner i hate how you didn’t run on the inside lane 1 you ran on the middle lane
um r we not gonna talk about how he said the new shoe is expensive when the old ones say 980.00$ and the new ones are like 280.00 to 300.00
Nikes first shoe was made in 1973 so original pairs of them go for a lot of money these days as a collectors item
When the shoes first dropped they were 30$ it’s only expensive now because they are rare while the 2024 pair was expensive at release
a 50 years old shoe not splitting apart impressed me the most
My mile is 14 and I'm 6 minutes
??
😂😂
I’m 14 and mine is 5:40
been smoking crack lately?
my mile is 2 and im 790 minutes
yeah the Nylon Nike Cortez , like on back to the Future, my favoite shoe fashion, but for running my favorite was the Nike Air Max, huge innovation 1987
22 Now… My best time in a mile was 4 min 54 sec…it was 2 yrs ago… I miss running and sprinting everyday…. I am only 5’5..
Try new balance supercomp for 185$. Carbon plate is in the mid foot not at front like Nike. In mid is safer. I damaged my ankles in Nikes
i’m 12 and my pr mile time is 6:49 without doing track or cross country
yeah 6:33 isnt a very good time
woww thats sooooo fast. sorry that this video was not made for you to spread info that no one asked for
I can run a mile in 5:47 that’s my personal best and I used the Nike Alphaflys and I felt like I was floating haha good shoe.
Old shoes 900?
Limited edition
Oh my god 17 likes in 1 night!
@@Sans7168 In case you're a Christian, please don't say "omg", that's a sin. If you're not, have a good day/night
I was a kid in Japan when all those started coming out. Pumas were popular at my school
Wait so you mean to tell me that that nest Nike running shoe in 2024 is faster than a shoe that was made 50 years ago?
~50 sec difference between a new and old shoe is wild!!
It was 53 sec difference so almost a minute which is even more ridiculous
@@eriktheginger99Thanks for correcting me, I wrote this late at night don’t know how i did the math so wrong lol.
I am only referring to things on my feet (which I normally call shoes) as Shews from now on. Grammatically correct. I love it.
@@flour5135 ONCE AGAIN i have been corrected, thank you for spotting that. I shall rewrite this comment once again. Lovely
Thing is they aren’t even made to make you go faster. They are just made more for comfortability when running let’s say a marathon. Which makes it even better. 😂
Bro first one looked like Fallout vault suits 💀
I'm 3 months and my mile is 2 seconds
the old version was written (article i think) or made on my birthday! march 30:3
Is nobody gonna talk about how that track is straight concrete???😭
My fastest mile was 5:04 back in my prime soccer days
Nobody cares
@@iz2043I do
@@iz2043I care
@@Coolpickle9nah
Cool story, mine was way faster
Bro the old shoes cost more that 2x more the the modern shoes.
There were almost Steve prefontanes shoes
When he showed the price tag on the older shoe it was more expensive than the newer one 😂
Because they are vintage/rare. When the old ones first came out they were only $20-25
Damn that’s a whole min
The difference is brutal! 🤯
This fking video killed My braincells how tf u could compare a fkn show with holes to a brand new
well how is he going to get a 50 year old shoe in perfect condition without paying $1500+
there are replicas
Thats just a state of mind bro!!
Dude say Nike Alphafly expensive while he buys oldest shoes for ×4 more expensive
Ain’t no way bro just beat my fastest mile time by a whole minute in 300 year old shoes
Those new shoes making my knees hurt.
Should get a knee brace or something then
The old ones were like 4 times more expensive 💀
Bc now you can’t buy them retail and they’re a more niche collectors item
Bro said the new ones were expensive they were 200 the old ones were about 1000 dollars
That’s just cause they were vintage the material is old asf
I said the same thing
Coming from a college xc and track runner, that doesn’t really determine how fast you’ll run a mile. Sure trainers from 50 years ago might make a little difference than ones from today, but it mostly depends on your personal speed and your recent training. Also, you don’t need the most expensive ones, they do not guarantee you’ll run faster
I really wanted to buy the Fresh foam bb v2 but we dont have stocks here and it expensive in the website 😢.Great video as always tommy!
Would you also be able to review the Anta zap 1? Thanks!
How tf the soles did not come off? All my nikes are broken after 1-2 years even brand new
Yeah if you’re running in shoes that’s how long they last lol. Even if you weren’t running in them, in 2 years foam starts breaking down on its own.
@@sjeffy5137 there are shoes I buy to collect and they already broken … sitting on the shelf
What I'd be more interested in knowing though is what kind of difference I might reasonably expect to see going from something like the Boston 12 to the Adios Pro 3. I'm not convinced I'd see any noticable difference, which has prevented me from spending the money on top end shoes, but maybe it would make a difference?
My mile is 5:53 and I’m 12
My mile is 5:52 and I’m 11
I’ve just started using running shoes with more technology built in them since I’m running for longer distances now.
Before I only using older bare minimum style running sneakers (like the Onitsuka Tiger) as I was only running a max of 3-5 miles.
ngl i beat ur time in crocs and sweats in the rain
That old Shoe was 980 dollars and the modern shoe was 200
Why he running in lane 5 or 4
What difference does it make? A mile is a mile no matter where you run. If you can't figure out why one might run in outer lanes, then you probably don't understand physics and biomechanics.
@@Tritiuminducedfusion umm all my life I was taught that lane one was the shortest distance around the track, lane 7 is the longest distance and that’s why everyone always sticks to lane one in middle and long distance races
Meanwhile the Tarahumara folk are running ultras in leather sandals and a tire tread sole 😂
Yo I ran a mile in 4th grade in fly eases 6:27 😂
The fact that 1973 is *over 50 years old*
This experiment is flawed there no exact way to prove this claim as there’s no way to keep your running speed constant across two tests. Plus if you do so no matter the shoe or no shoe if you running at the same speed it doesn’t matter what you wear
The newer shoes are estimated to give a 4% boost of efficiency/running economy in elite runners. Someone not as fast may experience a slightly higher number, but it doesn't take a minute off your mile time. I have 2 different pairs of carbon plated shoes, and yes they help...but you don't just shave off minutes in a short race. They're actually more designed for road racing at slightly longer distances like half marathon and marathon. That's where you'll notice the biggest difference
My mile is 6:32 seconds no joke
so fast…
I'm 13 and can run a sub 6
@@PumaFan180same but I’m 12
Y'all slow af I'm 10 and my PR is 5:54
if the old shoes were really made in 1973 and not just released in that year, than the physical age of the shoe itself definitely also plays a role. I wonder how the new ones will do in 50 years if you use that exact pair
I’m 2 and my mile is 1:07
1:07 blud you forgot something
1:07(hours)
I can't even afford 30$ shoes 😢😢
My mile is 5:26 at 15 yrs old
Nice, I got a 6:00 at 13, for gym class
Thats very good for your age
My mile time was ~8:30 when I was 13
slow ah
Mine is 4:39 for a 14 year old is that good?
@@matttyree8317no it’s bad
And the fact that he could be a little tired from the first mile
Or warmed up from it.
Stealing from Isaiah photo. 💀😭
He said they were expensive but the first ones said 900$
🔥🔥🔥
People wouldn’t need to pay 300 dollars for shoes if they literally just ran with proper form and bought some minimalist shoes like Vibrams. *I said what I said*
My mile is 5.30
Hes prob not trying to beat his record