Although the informal name "Y-chromosomal Adam" is a reference to the biblical Adam, this should not be misconstrued as implying that the bearer of the chromosome was the only human male alive during his time.[7] His other male contemporaries may also have descendants alive today, but not, by definition, through solely patrilineal descent; in other words, none of them have an unbroken male line of descendants (son's son's son's … son) connecting them to currently living people. Basically this disproves the story in Genesis as "Y-chromosomal Adam" was NOT the first man created by God and certainly was not created out of "the dust of the ground" as the Bible teaches. You can argue we are all made from the dust of the Earth, the basic elements, etc. but Adam was assembled DIRECTLY from this dust and was not born like the rest of us. We know Y-chromosomal Adam was not made that way because there is evidence of previous living humans in his DNA from which he came. Y-chromosomal Adam is the best proof we have that the story in the Bible is not true and did not happen the way it was written in Genesis. Not sure why this intelligent man thinks this proves Adam and Eve were real historical people? Hmmm.
first of all you are making a huge assumption by saying that there were actually other males who co-existed with the Y chromosome Adam(who were not his sons). The reason you assume this is because of your belief in evolution. The direct evidence proves that we all came from one Man. Yet you want to force fit the data by assuming foolishly that there were other males and their descendants did not make it till today. that's a huge leap of faith. We dont need to make huge leaps of faith, the science confirms the biblical view of creation. End of story.
@@rihkarrdoh9513 they sort of disprove this in the video, but if you actually dig a little deeper, you will find new evidence and studies that are pointing towards them being alive at the same time
@@rihkarrdoh9513 but if you're going to contradict the Bible so fully, why are you even using Biblical characters in your thinking? If two humans evolved thousands of years apart, that's not Adam and Eve.
@@lysanderofsparta3708 Because the so-called biologist in the video clip is wrong. Ask any legit biologists who has studied human genetic history and he/she will tell you that Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosome Adam does not mean there was a single woman and man from which all humans derived from. Instead Mitochondrial Eve was the first of many females but she was the only one who passed down the mitochondrial DNA in an unbroken female-to-female way. This idiot so-called scientist totally misrepresents what Mitochondrial Eve is in order to fit the absurd biblical idea that there was a literal Adam and Eve. By the way, biologists date Mitochondrial Eve to around 155,000 years ago. That doesn’t quite fit in with the 6,000-10,000 year old Earth model in the Bible now, does it.
You mean an atheist biologist? Well, I would say his belief is that fish turned to humans and that he would consider humans coming from humans ridiculous.
@@radrook2153 You’re talking about a process that suppose to take millions of years. And by the way, I wouldn’t talk…don’t you believe that light was created before stars were created?
@@leishmania4116 iv read it and experienced God's miracles in Jesus Christ name. I prayed for my self and others and God healed us in that moment. Some were shocked especially my 2 Friend and brother. Plus in the middle of my sleep paralysis I would call out to Jesus and the sleep paralysis would leave. Aka sleep paralysis is a demonic Spirt me and my brother know this from personal experience.
The mitochondrial "Adam" and "Eve" weren't the Biblical Adam and Eve. They lived at separate times and in separate places. They never met and they weren't a couple. Now for the Biblical Adam and Eve, all of humanity could not have descended from a single couple. That is impossible. This is because the gene pool wouldn't have been diverse and overtime medical problems would arise and we wouldn't be here. But despite all the issues with Adam and Eve, that doesn't mean they weren't real. I acknowledge the existence of a Biblical Adam and Eve along with the Garden of Eden. But I believe they weren't the first humans and the mother and father of all humans.
the Fact is all humans today came from one Male and one Female exactly as the bible says. What you are telling me is that all the other males and females failed to reproduce or their offspring did not make it alive till today is a huge leap of faith. So according to you all the males and their descendants died except one Man and his descendants and all the females and their descendants died except one Female and her descendants???? if evolution was true this is not realistic at all, it requires too much blind faith to believe this thing actually somehow managed to happen. But it fits perfectly with biblical creation, we don't have to force fit the data like you do. Secondly we creationists believe in created heterozygousity hypothesis. Evolution says that variations arise by mutations, but according to us God created Adam and Eve with inbuilt genetic differences, so inbreeding wont be a problem at all as there are already many variations present. We predict based on our hypothesis that most of the dna must be functional cause God wouldn't make junk dna. And our predictions are exactly confirmed that the vast majority of the DNA is functional and not junk as evolution claims it to be. So our theory is far stronger than evolution. Thirdly, you have an inbreeding problem not us. Because at the out of africa event the population of humanity was reduced to 10,000 . they inbred for many thousands of years, and there were many bottlenecks that happened before also. So explain to me how did the humans who were affected by these bottlenecks survived thousand and thousands of years of inbreeding effects. Go ahead
The Bible isnt more advanced than science. Because the Bible is fictional garbage. Just because christian apologetics and other Christian bias sources falsely claim science is catching with the Bible doesn’t make it true. Science can backup what it claims. The garage from the Bible cant be backup. The moon isn’t a light not even a lesser light as the Bible says it is. The earth definitely is flat with a dome aka firmament as the Bible describes.
There is actually no contradiction. God created the universe once they are just two accounts of it. If you look up on Wikapedia you will know that timedating has changed and now mitochondrial eve and y chromosomal adam lived at the same time which makes it possible yet unlikely but possible that they actually were a couple
@@stinksterrekerinski4450 the bible is fictional garbage that describes the earth as being flat with a dome aka firmament. It false says the moon is a lesser light when its not a light at all. It also falsely claims the earth is older than the sun. When the su n is in fact older than the sun. You need to learn real facts instead of believing the delusional lies claimed by apologetics and other Christian bias sources.
Although the informal name "Y-chromosomal Adam" is a reference to the biblical Adam, this should not be misconstrued as implying that the bearer of the chromosome was the only human male alive during his time.[7] His other male contemporaries may also have descendants alive today, but not, by definition, through solely patrilineal descent; in other words, none of them have an unbroken male line of descendants (son's son's son's … son) connecting them to currently living people. Basically this disproves the story in Genesis as "Y-chromosomal Adam" was NOT the first man created by God and certainly was not created out of "the dust of the ground" as the Bible teaches. You can argue we are all made from the dust of the Earth, the basic elements, etc. but Adam was assembled DIRECTLY from this dust and was not born like the rest of us. We know Y-chromosomal Adam was not made that way because there is evidence of previous living humans in his DNA from which he came. Y-chromosomal Adam is the best proof we have that the story in the Bible is not true and did not happen the way it was written in Genesis. Not sure why this intelligent man thinks this proves Adam and Eve were real historical people? Hmmm.
Your right Noah did have people to come before him, which was Adam.
first of all you are making a huge assumption by saying that there were actually other males who co-existed with the Y chromosome Adam(who were not his sons). The reason you assume this is because of your belief in evolution. The direct evidence proves that we all came from one Man. Yet you want to force fit the data by assuming foolishly that there were other males and their descendants did not make it till today. that's a huge leap of faith. We dont need to make huge leaps of faith, the science confirms the biblical view of creation. End of story.
@@onepunchman8328 you are a liar!
@@onepunchman8328bunch of nonsense
Fascinating!
Very interesting
Is this intended to be serious?
Exact dating? It’s off by about 194,000 years!
No
So if they weren't a couple then were did children come from...
They mated…???
But why were Adam and Eve highlighted when there were many before them
Mitochondria Eve, and Y Chromosome Adam.
They were not a couple they lived thousands of years apart from each other please do more research
@@rihkarrdoh9513 but the Man in the video said that thats not true anymore
@@rihkarrdoh9513 they sort of disprove this in the video, but if you actually dig a little deeper, you will find new evidence and studies that are pointing towards them being alive at the same time
@@rihkarrdoh9513 but if you're going to contradict the Bible so fully, why are you even using Biblical characters in your thinking? If two humans evolved thousands of years apart, that's not Adam and Eve.
@@coryc1904 thats the point the person is making
Is anybody buying this nonsense?
Holy Cow
The problem is the Adam and Eve Science is talking about lived, tens of thousands of years apart.
But that man in the video just said that thats not true anyomre
Would like to see a biologist’s reaction to this video clip.
Why?
@@lysanderofsparta3708 Because the so-called biologist in the video clip is wrong. Ask any legit biologists who has studied human genetic history and he/she will tell you that Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosome Adam does not mean there was a single woman and man from which all humans derived from. Instead Mitochondrial Eve was the first of many females but she was the only one who passed down the mitochondrial DNA in an unbroken female-to-female way. This idiot so-called scientist totally misrepresents what Mitochondrial Eve is in order to fit the absurd biblical idea that there was a literal Adam and Eve. By the way, biologists date Mitochondrial Eve to around 155,000 years ago. That doesn’t quite fit in with the 6,000-10,000 year old Earth model in the Bible now, does it.
@@Adam-mj5hl That’s a really dumb argument.
You mean an atheist biologist? Well, I would say his belief is that fish turned to humans and that he would consider humans coming from humans ridiculous.
@@radrook2153 You’re talking about a process that suppose to take millions of years. And by the way, I wouldn’t talk…don’t you believe that light was created before stars were created?
Odds on this genetics 🧬 is unlikely
So... why is our DNA 98% identical to a chimpanzee?
Wait where did you learn that?
@@justadude777 From this thingy called science.
@@JohnG-tv3gc no my friend what I meant was did you study this in a lab yourself to see if it's ligit or did you learn it from wiki or RUclips video?
@@justadude777 Did you see Jesus doing miracles yourself or did you read about it in the Bible?
@@leishmania4116 iv read it and experienced God's miracles in Jesus Christ name.
I prayed for my self and others and God healed us in that moment. Some were shocked especially my 2 Friend and brother.
Plus in the middle of my sleep paralysis I would call out to Jesus and the sleep paralysis would leave. Aka sleep paralysis is a demonic Spirt me and my brother know this from personal experience.
Fake news
The mitochondrial "Adam" and "Eve" weren't the Biblical Adam and Eve. They lived at separate times and in separate places. They never met and they weren't a couple. Now for the Biblical Adam and Eve, all of humanity could not have descended from a single couple. That is impossible. This is because the gene pool wouldn't have been diverse and overtime medical problems would arise and we wouldn't be here. But despite all the issues with Adam and Eve, that doesn't mean they weren't real. I acknowledge the existence of a Biblical Adam and Eve along with the Garden of Eden. But I believe they weren't the first humans and the mother and father of all humans.
So do you believe that they were each created and then bred with other human like creatures to give them more "human like" features?
the Fact is all humans today came from one Male and one Female exactly as the bible says. What you are telling me is that all the other males and females failed to reproduce or their offspring did not make it alive till today is a huge leap of faith. So according to you all the males and their descendants died except one Man and his descendants and all the females and their descendants died except one Female and her descendants???? if evolution was true this is not realistic at all, it requires too much blind faith to believe this thing actually somehow managed to happen. But it fits perfectly with biblical creation, we don't have to force fit the data like you do.
Secondly we creationists believe in created heterozygousity hypothesis. Evolution says that variations arise by mutations, but according to us God created Adam and Eve with inbuilt genetic differences, so inbreeding wont be a problem at all as there are already many variations present. We predict based on our hypothesis that most of the dna must be functional cause God wouldn't make junk dna. And our predictions are exactly confirmed that the vast majority of the DNA is functional and not junk as evolution claims it to be. So our theory is far stronger than evolution.
Thirdly, you have an inbreeding problem not us. Because at the out of africa event the population of humanity was reduced to 10,000 . they inbred for many thousands of years, and there were many bottlenecks that happened before also. So explain to me how did the humans who were affected by these bottlenecks survived thousand and thousands of years of inbreeding effects. Go ahead
Science is always late to the party. It’s just a great excuse.
This is a joke.
Science is catching up to the bible. How funny is that?
The Bible isnt more advanced than science. Because the Bible is fictional garbage. Just because christian apologetics and other Christian bias sources falsely claim science is catching with the Bible doesn’t make it true. Science can backup what it claims. The garage from the Bible cant be backup. The moon isn’t a light not even a lesser light as the Bible says it is. The earth definitely is flat with a dome aka firmament as the Bible describes.
Christianity is built on the resurrection of Jesus. Prove that, you prove Christianity.
@@trevorphillips6382 Qur'an have better explanation
the only Fictional Garbage is coming out of your Mouth
@@trevorphillips6382 You sound upset.
There is actually no contradiction. God created the universe once they are just two accounts of it. If you look up on Wikapedia you will know that timedating has changed and now mitochondrial eve and y chromosomal adam lived at the same time which makes it possible yet unlikely but possible that they actually were a couple
and what would that say about Christianity if they were not a couple?
@@lukehillland nothing it wouldn’t matter
Don't worry. Science will continue to be slowly updated but people will try to make it slower and continue to not believe the good book.
@@stinksterrekerinski4450 the bible is fictional garbage that describes the earth as being flat with a dome aka firmament. It false says the moon is a lesser light when its not a light at all. It also falsely claims the earth is older than the sun. When the su n is in fact older than the sun. You need to learn real facts instead of believing the delusional lies claimed by apologetics and other Christian bias sources.
@@trevorphillips6382 I agree the Bible is fake.