Alex Jones Defamation Trial Sandy Hook 'Hoax' Lawsuit - Connecticut Trial Day Eight Part Two
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 сен 2022
- Infowars host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones stands trial yet again in civil court in a defamation case brought by families of the Sandy Hook mass shooting victims. This time, the trial is in Connecticut and is expected to last four weeks. The plaintiffs are eight families and an FBI agent. Jones already lost the case by default. Jurors will determine the money to be awarded. Learn more about this case: bit.ly/3xjm8vC
#AlexJones #Defamation #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
Thank you for posting this after the live feed dropped. 👍🏻
For real!
I was wondering what was going on
It was crazy. All live feed from RUclips crashed at once. Like across all of RUclips.
@@trustknowwaunful really?! That's nuts!!
@@trustknowwaunful Yeah that was so frustrating! So glad they posted this!
The coverage you have for day eight is three and a half hours long but there is absolutely nothing on the video it just stares at the court wall for 3 hours
Because Alex was supposed to testify today, but Pattis decided not to call him and sent him home to Texas so suddenly, they had nothing to present today. They adjourned to try to regroup a couple of times and to agree on what to tell the jury about why there'd be no evidence presented today. So yeah, a lot of wall time.
Alex will be back next week some time.
They’re gonna disable comments any moment now
Hopefully they will. These AJ fans are looney! 🙄
@@trustknowwaunful I don't know, I'm kind of enjoying the lunacy of his fans! Very entertaining!
@@trustknowwaunful you want comments disabled just bc they’re crazy? There are no threats or anything illegal
@@321snoot yeah, why disable that?
I mean I guess. 🤷🏻😅
Just amazing that there are more layers to this onion of stupidity called Alex Jones and their strategy
I just love how these trials are exposing the stupidity of his followers.
@@ashtarsheran953 your own stupidity is on trial here darling. Stop sucking the governments 🍆
@@ashtarsheran953 Agreed.
So we don't get video coverage of day 8?
Day 8 schedule got wrecked. The plaintiffs planned to continue questioning Jones, and the defense may have as well. Instead Jones held a press conference in front of the court house and left.
@@phantomsplit3491 He took his ball and went home. He got mad and didn't want to play anymore.
@@TangoNevada I think that Pattis said that it was his decision not to call Alex today though. Not Alex's choice. But I don't know.
@@Vindsus86 I know what Norm said. But who is paying Norm? That's all just words to cover up for the fact that Alex lost it in the last few minutes of testifying.
@@TangoNevada It wouldn't surprise me at all if Alex wanted to show up in court yesterday and that Pattis actually had to convince him not to. He's an attention wh*re. I don't think he'd willingly give up the stage like that. But who knows.
O finally, today has been a day on non permission given!
She does a big speech about 'please don't interrupt me' - then at the end of the speech, the guy interrupts her. 7:40
The judge needs to just sanction him and then maybe he'll learn and won't do that to another one in the future he knows the rules of the Court.!!
How many jurors are there, in this, the Connecticut case? 9 or 12?
6
@@shamesjtunt7423 Is it only six? Are there alternates? I know one person was excused after a few days for work.
Do you believe Alex Jones will have a fair jury given the judge skipped a fair trial on the (lack of) evidence, continuously violates his rights, & severely prejudices the jury - all against due process - ?
@@TeamFreedom3 😂
Phone or are these people morphing before our eyes
What?
so many smart people are evil
Defense counsel is obviously a train wreck - and he certainly isn’t the brightest bulb on his best days, but I wouldn’t call him evil
@@markieffmorris9263 how did you get “defense counsel” out of “so many smart people”?
she needs to take control of the courtroom
I was watching the live: When the plaintiff said that Alex Jones wasn’t going to testify, he looked dejected 😂 He was like, “Why do we even have court? All the good people are gone.”
Yep, and he is one of the bad people
Keep in mind that this is a civil action - there's a plaintiff (the party who broght the action / complaint) & defense. None of the attorneys are representing the government.
(I'm not a lawyer but I've certainly funded a boat ir two 😊)
@@DavidHRyall you are full on delusional
spare the sanction and spoil the lawyer.
oooohhhhh thats a big no no, your not suppose to mention Jury Nullification at all in court. its been shown to effect juries.
The lawyer was complaining about what Alex Jones said outside the courthouse on thee steps. Pretry sure he has a first amendment right to say what he wants outside the court. Maybe he shouldnt say anything strategically, , but he has the right to.
@@danwagner5409 I know thats what most of the video is about, I'm talking about the few seconds where he brings up Jury Nullification at the start of his comments. No Judge wnats those words to be spoken in their courtroom especially infront of the jury as it increases the probability of a rogue jury practicing jury nullificiation.
@@chriswandell3570 At 4:12 the defense lawyer brings it up, but there is no jury in the room. He brings it up after the plaintiff lawyer try and get Alex Jones gaged and they hint he treatened them, then back off after they realize the judge will watch the video. The lawyers are being scummy here because Jones calls them tyrants, it appears they may be with this game they are playing.
This judge seems to have the patience of Job. Kudos to her.
shes doing it so the defense cant call for a re trial based on bias.
@@totallyrandom4816 she’s failing because she is quite biased
@@neuuser7071 she favors the attorneys attacking jones. They can say hateful things to him and she allows it
Really? By butting in on Jones lawyer?
She is probably livid off the record. I would be.
No attorney could defend Alex with a serious tone. Instead they have to make it a circus to defend the indefensible.
Pattis seems to have a thing for defending undesirable clients. I think he said something to that effect in a recent Dateline episode. Don't quote me on that though.
Not how it works. Read a book.
@@Vindsus86 you mean a duty as an attorney?
@@neuuser7071 I mean that he says that he loves taking on clients that nobody else wants. That he's attracted to chaos. Each to their own, I guess.
This is not the part where they need to provide evidence for his guilty or not plea.... this is the part where damages are being set. Patis and jones both have a gag order from this Judge so they can;t argue virtually anything in their defense. Answering YES/NO questions? While everyone else (witnesses) cry on the stand and give their life stories? come on! You must really hate Alex and free speech to agree with that. And what about CNN that bullshits an entire world with Russia HOAX and soooooo MANY DAILY lies? nah... they all good right ? hahaha
Pattis is incredibly rude to this Judge, and she allows it. Over and over. What's it going to take for her to finally hold him in contempt? It's clear he's not respecting the Court. It's ridiculous.
She's being impartial in action to prevent an appeal from being a legitimate course of action. Anybody that would look at this case would laugh at any sort of partially on the judges behalf
Even judges need to be put in their place when they are acting like jerks. He is doing that
I know, I can't believe with how lenient and patient she has been with all the misconduct by Pattis and repeated refusal to obey her instructions by Alex that people think she is biased towards the prosecution.
Her leniency might be a product of her not wanting any excuses from Jones or his team, in regards to the validity of the case. I can't think of any other reason than a, "let's get this over with" mentality.
@@SergioGonzalez-yj9ui Yeah, she sure isn't going to play into their attempts at a mistrial. If that's even a thing in a civil Case. At least Alex and his "Defense Team" can't come away saying they weren't given every opportunity to speak. They literally never stop speaking.
Insults = security concerns? WTF????
Said who?
@@Vindsus86 the plaintiffs attorney at 2:27 thru 2:35.
@@the2ndprotectstherest582 he's saying that they do Not have any immediate concerns for their safety following Alex's remarks. That they were demeaning and ridiculing, but not threatening. He wants to clarify to the court in case "... [the belief that there might be security concerns] was what was prompting some urgency from the board". So... 🤷
@@Vindsus86 I know that but he implied that insults could equal security concerns. Just the fact that he even implied the possibility was ridiculous.
@@the2ndprotectstherest582 uhm...
Wrong way disrespectful to a judge of the law for caught up in their mouthiness the very things that got him into court in the first place
She very much treats him like a toddler who just can't help themself.
Lol this video and case was intended to shut down Alex, it’s having the opposite effect
@Null Pointer You've obviously never watched a single show or you want to live under tyranny. Move to China or Singapore.
MISSING COMMENT. ANTI-1A, EXACTLY LIKE THIS POLITICAL HIT "TRIAL." ✅
Find out what he's worth, TRIPLE it and lock him up!
All of you liberals belong in a dumpster
I am waiting for one of the several trolls here to use the term "peek-a-boo" like their booty-daddy.
Plaintiffs counsel was completely disingenuous in the representations they made to the court earlier this morning. I am anti Jones and pro good lawyering.
The plaintiffs' counsel are arguing on the plaintiffs' behalf and to the plaintiffs' benefit. Nothing weird or wrong with that. Now, Alex has already been sanctioned for remarks made about one of the attorneys (he offered a million dollars for Mattei's head on a pike. Which, if I were Mattei, would make me hyper vigilante whenever Alex mentioned me again) and he's been found liable for what he's said about the families so maybe he should just not talk about them. I think it is serious that he didn't testify Friday, yet held a press conference outside the court. Now, Pattis said that it was his choice to not call Alex. Maybe Alex really wanted to talk. But I still think it's unwise. Bad optics. And his own attorney seemingly wasn't aware it was happening.
@@Vindsus86 Nobody qualifies as a "plaintiff." Do better homework.
Why are you anti-Jones? You have a yearning to live under tyranny. Think ahead better than that.
What a shoot show
Which part?
well, jones is a shoot head
@@stephenroldan5107 The whole part. LOL
Koskoff and Matti are so so annoying
-10:26
A note about Elizabeth Williamson:
Liz: "Jones can't continue his testimony because he damaged himself..."
Norm: "I didn't say that, I said, 'lower the temperature!'"
Liz: "Norm didn't say "damage," lemme correct that..."
We know what Norm meant, but Liz corrected herself, because that's what a real journalist does. If Jones had issued retractions/corrections, he wouldn't be about to be juiced like the overripe melon that he is.
I still think it was ill-advised of Elizabeth to write that because it's SO easy for Alex and his supporters to point to and say that the media is lying about him and so on. Like Dan of Knowledge fight said in the latest episode (paraphrased, but hopefully fairly so): we actually don't know if Norm meant that Mattei needed some cooling-off or something like that or if he was talking about Alex. Or just the whole situation. And for a journalist to just pick which one he meant (presumably because that's how she felt) and tweet about it, in this "MSM"-hostile environment, was just... disappointing.
@@Vindsus86
I agree, but it was well advised of her (and indeed, best practices) to issue a correction. I don't think the Warsh has _ever_ issued a retraction or correction.
ed. Warsh = Infowarsh, my shorthand to indicate:
1) the information is laundered, and
2) the operation is run by hillbillies.
@@KidVolcano yeah, I'm glad that she retracted and issued a correction.
@@Vindsus86
Like a responsible person in her position would. (I represent to you, that she was, ya know, correct-ish)
(Whoa, hey, I just _now_ realized that retraction actually means to intentionally limit the reach/spread of a message one had intentionally propagated. Thanks 👍)
She's a liar & can be sued exactly like they've done to Jones who didn't defame anyone. Quote the trial EVIDENCE proving otherwise if you disagree.
Attorney Paddis is out of line. What the papers say is irrelevant.
If what the papers say is irrelevant then what Jones says during his show is also irrelevant. You just declared this lawsuit to be a frivolous lawsuit that needs to be dismissed, and you have absolutely no idea what you just said ....nor does the Judge. It will be used as evidence in future lawsuits filed by Alex Jones.
Just like what Alex Jones says to the media is irrelevant as well…
In this case; what the press reported is accurate
@@Kaspen82 no it isn't
No he's not, Alex can't even say anything, if he does the Judge just scolds him.
What a sham trial
Wonders why Law & Crime Network so abruptly turned off the live streaming tho...
All live streams on RUclips went out at once. It was RUclips, L&C
Feed just froze. RUclips on overload. 😮
Yeah 'cause there always has to be a nefarious reason for everything. A livestream can't just randomly stop working.
(Edit: to be clear, I'm being sarcastic)
@@Vindsus86 I wouldn't agree with your statement. But if you want to believe that, it's all good. sort of
@@deadsolarsystem6298 I mean, I was being sarcastic and making fun of people who think there has to be a reason behind everything. I don't know if you're disagreeing with my sarcasm or if you'd disagree with my statement if it were serious. 😄
Does the judge or jury have any doubts about how nasty Jones is? Take the shirt off his back, leave him with nothing, his family put up with him no one else has to!
Good luck with that. He is getting so much free publicity out of all this he will get richer and richer.
@@KRDos_Aus hi from the future: he is not doing well financially.
It’s his fault he did all the damage!!! He’s a pos
i love the beat downs these judges are taking, earn your money!!!
This judge is a boss playing the long game. She is absolutely great at her job, and she has the perfect temperament and measured approach this case needs.
…the constant interruptions by both sides are one thing, she is the prime culprit as far as interrupting is concerned. She has a great temperament for Jones/Pattis
@@Oakiebobwlfd don't come here with your baby talk. Obviously you don't understand court proceedings and the job of the judge. And there isn't enough time to get you up to speed. Move on.
Are you serious? So far during this case, she has looked very annoyed, frustrated and at times, she's taken matters personally. For instance; the photo of her with red lasers. I'm not a fan of Alex Jones and his outlandish conspiracy theories, but this judge has definitely taken sides and her biased nature is evident, especially with the unnecessary sidebars and turning a blind eye to the defence's bad behaviour or inappropriate questioning. A good judge is about being impartial.
@@Aerojet01 so, my friend, what exactly did she do unfairly? Be specific instead of generalizations. Or, do you just need to vent?
@@XlogicXX There isn't enough time to get you up to speed. Move on.
This judge allows herself to be perceived as being weak. Amazing how an attorney could think it’s even remotely okay to even TRY to speak over a judge.
Judge’s really shouldn’t be speaking honestly. They should be listening. It’s the solicitors job to speak and the judge gets to decide what is in the record. Judges shouldn’t be practicing law. And from what I’m hearing she doesn’t want to hear anything other than what has already per determined.
@@mukmowf9402 You're a long way from the U.K, we don't call them Solicitors here across the pond.
The judge is argumentative. She's the one creating the chaos in the court
@@TruthfulBoredom you live in a land that has your inns of law in the temple church of London. The Magna Carta was for Barons not you. You are a peasant I’m a lord I’m a king you are a slave. You bow to a king I am the king…. Mull that over in your minuscule brain. You literally live under tyranny you can’t even own guns, you aren’t afforded the rights of sovereignty you’re a serf. Don’t make me laugh, show respect to your superiors.
@@deadsolarsystem6298 facts glad you see it
6:30 "Rules of professional Misconducts" is what she really meant!!!
It is interesting to observe the moral values portrayed here. That there are people willing to promote untrue, inaccurate information and use their views to mobilize violence against victims and people protecting society is shocking. That these individuals are unable to reflect on their actions and behave in reasonable ways is saddening. These individuals motivated by money and willing to persecute other members of our society. It is a shame to watch this daily on RUclips knowing they intend to continue with this behaviour for the almighty dollar.
On another level it is so sad to see what disrespectful behavior is being used against the legal system. The disrespect for the judge. The judge truly appears to be a sort of Saint. She is enduring terrible things. The accused attacks her publicly. I have an extremely high level of respect for the judge here. Her wisdom, knowledge of the law, ability to deal with the atrocities which are being applied.
Lulz. This trial is a farce. Alex Jones has been railroaded since day one. He was declared guilty by a judge and barred from preventing his defense to the jury. This trial was politically motivated from day one. Ask yourself one question, why is there a lawsuit now, and not in 2013 or 2014?
You know 0 about this show "trial." You took the jab, huh?
I really think this judge is way to lenient. Lay down the law and if the defense doesn't abide by it, hold them in contempt. The judges record of not sanctioning a lawyer should not come into play.
She's doing everything she can so that they cannot argue, and more importantly, appeal this case. She's being fair, in my opinion.
This judge is fair. I bet you loved the last judge
You’re showing your bias. The defense has a duty to advocate for their client.
I guess you don’t know what contempt is.
You are crazy the judge is totally bias . .wont even let an attorney speak .
❤This judge.Pattis is SO rude to her.
Alex Jones is going make millions off this trial ! 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
I bet this judge is thoroughly disgusting with his face by now.
very NPC.. nice work unit 8200
He'll be sanctioned again before the end of this trial, we still got a ways to go in this trial and this guy has no respect for the court
You mean sectioned? lol
Give Alex Jones the chair
What an immature remark.
Silly. Not a criminal trial. Too bad because AJ makes me barf.
It'll have a pretty strong and heavy chair for it not to break under him.
Why do you want to give Alex Jones a chair? He has his own money. If he wanted a knew chair he would just buy one/ o.O
I would have imagined you would have at least a few hundred supporters outside the court every day in support of him. I guess most of his supporters are so mentally unwell that they could never make such an outing to the court.
Supporters in Connecticut. Hmmmm. We all lived Sandy Hook here.
Unlike Leftists, most Right-wingers have jobs during the day.
I watched the press conference three times and Alex Jones DID NOT make a statement asking jurors to do independent research....as much as people don’t like Alex Jones this should not have been a threat to him or his attorney. The Judge has openly and strongly threatened the defense counsel but not the prosecution for misleading (or even blatantly lying) to the court???? Come onnnnnn. We can disagree with people and still want truth and justice. This issue should not have been “moved on from”. The prosecutor should be admonished and the judge needs to fix the lie. She is SO BIASED
THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO SPREAD LIES THAT ARE EASILY DEBUNKED.
Yet msm are allowed to do it constantly.
AJ's goose is cooked, now its just how cooked he will be !
Well done
Medium rare pls
@@christophercasey6775 I see what you did there.
I like my Alex Jones goose burnt and crispy. Not an ounce of fluid left.
Where's Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Green Jean's I'm waiting with my milk in hand, A real Kangaroo court!
Kangaroo 🦘 court
Alex Jones is tremendously entertaining!
Alex Jones is going make millions off this trial ! 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
@@BIGBADWOOD as he should!
Well said my friend. Greetings from the UK.
He will grift from the poorly educated 👍
@@BIGBADWOOD and lose it all to the families, so yay!!!
Apparently nobody takes Alex Jones seriously except his conspiracy theorist nutcases following his show
Is there a point to your comment relative to this trial?
Apparently you just want Alex's 1st Amdt. rights to be taken first! Then you can take EVERYBODY'S you don't like or politcally agree with!!! That's called communism. In a Republic with FREE SPEECH we have a choice to watch something, or turn it OFF if ya don't like it!! But don't you dare think you will take anyone else's choice away without consequences or repercussions!!! Because WE either maintain America or we slide down a slope I don't think anybody wants to go!!
A show trial
Alex should have said “the jury ‘should have done’ their research prior to the case”
He didn’t even say what they lied and told the court he said. Although it will shock a lot of people he responded to a question from a reporter and when you hear the question and response it is clear he was NOT asking for the jury to do any Independent research. He kept saying in the press conference that he has been barred from defending himself in the court by the judge and the reporter asked him what he would like the jury to know and he says (not word for word but you can watch for yourself) “I’m barred from defending myself but if I could tell them anything I would say..:(insert his thoughts on the case about 1st amendment then he went on a tangent about the mmm vs independent news sources).
@@athompson5089 oh right, perfect. So that will be his defence when the plaintiff continue to clutch at straws! Thanks for that
@@athompson5089 Funny how all of the sudden NOW conspiracy chuds are super concerned about the *factual basis* of things. Where was all this concern 10 years ago? When Alex Jones KNOWINGLY LIED about a mass shooting to make money?
Alex said he wants the jury to do their own research. I have the documents right here. 🙂 If you think otherwise, you're just a MSM shill trying to kill America.
Jones needs a gag order outside the court. His lawyer needs a gag order inside the court.
Judge shouldn't be begging for anything. Cant believe she's been a judge for 20 years as I think she said.
A gag order would probably help him at this point, every time he speaks Mattei introduces it as an exhibit
Really, you really belive a judge should be able to take away a defendents 1st amendment right..why not his 4th Amendment right too....just jail him as he is annoying....this isnt Russia or China...
@@worsethanjoerogan8061
That's OK the families lawyers will just bring it into court to help their case.
Wow, comments are turned on.... Free speech is important and its my belief that comments should be left on. Despite their freedom to do so, selectively turn on and off comments depending upon the whims of whomever is another way to limit discussion an debate.
And to hide dislikes is yet another way to control the narrative...
We are living in unprecedented times.... And its ashame to have such implementations curtail the public consciousness.
Yes they are doing all that AND deleting almost all the 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 (Likes). Those with truth on their side speak freely & have no problem when others do. We welcome debate. It's obvious they delete & censor any opinions/narratives they don't want out &/or that their global overlords won't allow. Which is exactly (ironically) what this case is about.
MY COMMENT WAS DELETED.
"When I interrupt you, you must stop speaking. "
Yes she completely misses the irony of her behaviour.
Alex never said the jury should research what he was saying he was responding to a question and told the journalist that the jury was lied to and that the journalist should research what he was saying!!!
He said they should "research history" not specifically the case. So it wont stand in court.
Come on Robert, the actual facts are pesky things when you dont like Alex Jones...Plaintiff lawyers are pretty despicable here.
A copy on flash drive? They admitted on the record their willful violations of RUclips terms of service. Not a very wise decision.
@Null Pointer contract law always reigns supreme.
The judge is a bully. No one is allowed to talk over her but she is happy to interrupt and talk over anyone else. Respect is a two way street. Give it and you will give it back.
dawg that's how a court works. You can't talk over the judge.
@@danielbanta2249 it's not how all courts work. I have seen plenty where judges don't continually interrupt and have a go at the lawyers. They let them finish their comment.
@@KRDos_Aus The judge told the lawyer that she was rejecting his request and he kept pushing. At that point, the judge is well within their right to interrupt and tell him to stop. Also, I didn't watch the whole trial but based on the clip, it seemed like this has been a pattern. At the end of the day, any lawyer should know that they cannot ignore a judge's requests and if ya do, you are going to get reprimanded.
@@danielbanta2249 I have watched it all and this not letting anyone else speak is her mo.
It's her courtroom. She is in charge. That's the way it works.
Gag Alex The Clown 🤡
If they gag Alex Jones they will use this to be able to gag you
Seems like Pattis did. At least for the time being.
@@AMan-ej3bb Alex Jones himself has sued others for defamation. Why does he want to gag other people? Does he not care about the first amendment? 😢
Go watch Alex Jones on Joe Rogan… Stop the 🧢 Robert 🤣
We should repeal the first amendment
a bag-lady is charge of a 'judge'
Court is so biased.
Why was the suspect running through the woods never identified after being placed in the front seat of police cruiser
THIS JUDGE IS NOT CONTROLLING HER COURTROOM.....TAKE CONTROL!!!!
I'm starting to think she does. She lets plaintiff atty call witnesses by 1st name, but not defense. Such a small thing, but telling. She only loses it when AJ atty fights back and has an argument she cannot deny. I've NEVER heard a judge continually interrupt an atty and then threaten to hold them in contempt for talking over them. Never listened or read to AJ. However, he is right. She is a tyrant
The jury isn't present though.
She has to walk a very fine line. Pettis would love her to sanction him; hoping for viewers sympathy.
@@Vindsus86 Respect is respect and jones's attorney is blatantly disrespectful towards the Judge, jury or no jury.
@@rhondarice4132 no he’s not
This trial make a mockery of our justice system!
it was all jones own doing...
Really? Holding a man accountable for causing pain and suffering to the families grieving for the loss of their precious children is a mockery of our justice system?🤔
Alex jones is the mockery !!
Havent another trial didnt they just have one on this?
Yes this law firm is going around the country suing different companies using these parents as a cash cow. That’s basically how it works😂
@@trustknowwaunful actually a different set of plaintiffs...the defendant is still Alex Jones
@@zerofox7347 OR maybe they are just holding the d1rtb@ggg aj accountable for his despicable self...
No its just not that... lol this is a different lawfirm in a different state with different defendents. This suit started a long time ago but due to its complex nature and lots of BS by Alex's defense to just put it off its just now starting. That's the facts believe it or not
@@trustknowwaunful It’s the same defendant, Alex Jones, but different plaintiffs.
Robby Parker was the only parent spoken of by Alex before the Lawsuit and that's what they don't like him saying!!!
You know Alex is wrong when he says you have to say someone's name to defame them, that's just simply not true. If I were to say the primary host at the Infowars network is a cho-mo. That's actionable defamation, because it's obvious who I'm talking about
When Alex claimed the entire shooting was a staged event, he was indirectly claiming that the parents and family and first responders were lying actors......
Make sense? Any questions,m
Like Jones said, he never mentioned Robbie Parker's name. Jones always referred to him as one of the parents.
@@deadsolarsystem6298 so what?
You're right because it means nothing in a damages trial. He Defaulted. People keep acting like he didn't default on purpose, against the advice of counsel. He didn't want to produce documents to show how much money he was making. He took the time to setup bankruptcy.
He said The Parents! 🤪🤪🤪🤪
I wish the judge for the Nikolas Cruz trial was the judge on this, she would lay down the law
A typical Kangaroo-Court, at its best!!!
Alex Jones told you to say that?
you are such a good little jones parrot
@@Vindsus86 I've had more than my fair share of my personal experience with Kangaroo-Courts, in Orange County, Ca. ("aka: World-Capital-of-Fraud"). I have named their corruptions in follow up court documents, and even posted them online, to identify their corruptions!!! + I don't even know Alex Jones, or any of his associates!!! + a Question:: has any of the "Parents" testified, under oath, that his/her child was murdered at SH ???
@@kareemsalessi6171 okay... * smiles and backs away slowly *
So you haven't watched the trial? Go figure.
@@kareemsalessi6171 I just love how these trials are exposing the stupidity of his followers.... LIKE YOU.
Why was the rifle lanza used found unused in the trunk after the shooting
If this goes to the supreme court it will be thrown out. Anyone who has a brain knows that.
LMAO Tell me you don't know how Civil law works without telling me you don't know how Civil law works.
@@TruthfulBoredom if it goes to any of the higher courts its will be thrown out. Might even be thrown out during appeal.
@@shadowkiller9910 Hahaha, what cope! They didn't throw out Jim Fetzers lawsuit, why would this one be thrown out?
@@TruthfulBoredom im not gonna argue with someone who obviously hasn't followed the case or the previous case
@@shadowkiller9910 lol sure thing. I'd bet you can't even explain why Jones had a 180 page background report on the parent of one of the Sandy Hook victims.
They won’t hold him in contempt because then another judge can look at the details of the case and expose the bias of the judge
Thats what i was thinking. Its the only logical explanation on why they haven't done it yet.
WHAT bias? The ONLY verdict possible is to nail Alex Jones' balls to the wall!
The plaintiffs are panicking about things being heard, hence they want silence on the matter and only get out what they want to be heard. Peculiar much? Not a good look and very fishy
*Hopefully the jurors awards the victims’ families over $500 million*
I want to see them do what Hulk Hogan did to Gawker at trial. Once that settlement was reached Gawker was out of business.
Hopefully they seek it from the ACTUAL killer’s family
ADAM LANZA
Jacka$$
@@rmkilc try thinking this through again after you've hit puberty
each
@@deadreckoning292 thank you. What a pathetic trial.
Ponytail is pushing this judge cuz he sees she can be pushed. Give him some time in the cooler to contemplate his ways.
Why the gold fringe?
Why is there even a defamation trial to begin with?
Wow. On what planet do you live?
It isn't a trial, actually. Alex Jones refused to participate or cooperate with discovery that was ordered by the court, so he lost by default. This is a hearing for damages.
@@zxy78267 what damages? Hurt feelings?
Let’s go Alex!
Straight to prison &/or bankruptcy
Nasty troll.
@@jefflockaby702 I’ll take that bet
Q::: has any of the "Parents" testified, under oath, that his/her child was murdered at SH ???
Yes, they have.
I just love how these trials are exposing the stupidity of his followers.
"Parents"? Why do you use * " * Buddy of POS Alex Jones? Get lost.
@@ashtarsheran953 As I have NOT heard of such specific testimonies, If you have a clip in which they testified that their child was actually murdered at SH, then please post it here, !!!!
@@kareemsalessi6171 I already provided that for you, Qaren....
You can find testimony from two of the parents in the previous case THAT IS ON THIS VERY CHANNEL(Law & Crime).
Stop acting like you didn't know, Qultist.
I wonder if Pattis would still be behaving this way if a judge was a man. This judge should have thrown this guy in jail for 3 days to cool off..
Is the judge prejudiced because aclex Jones corporation ridiculed her?
🤦
She's doing her very best to maintain order in the court.
She should be dismissed...
If they feel threatened by what he claimed than it can hold truth to it.
Haha yeah that's not how threats work. 🙄
@@trustknowwaunful lmao yeah if there was a threat. Which there wasn't 😆
This judge is terrible, butting in on Jones lawyer then tells him off for trying to finish his point. Very poor and most peculiar
The Sandy Hook parent (Robby Parker) who spoke in front of microphones at the time of this tragedy looked familiar from somewhere. He looked familiar and his mannerisms were familiar from somewhere before. I thought it was odd at the time.
Do you have a point? Or are you "just asking questions"
You people sicken me, and everyone else who believes in human decency....
Sooo... odd at the time? Are you insinuating that you did recognise him from somewhere? Or just that Alex said he was an actor so he probably was and you must have seen him somewhere?
@@Vindsus86 - I really don't know. Might have been someone from my college days. Really can't say.
@@nancywood9027 ... okay? What if you'd actually met Robby Parker before? Would that be suspicious? I mean, I think you're just mistaken, but I don't know what you're getting at with saying that it was suspicious at the time that you thought you recognised him.
@@Vindsus86 - I don't recall saying it was suspicious. I just said it seemed odd at the time. It just seemed kinda deja vu for some reason. Maybe some day I will figure out why.
This judge is a joke
Alex Jones is going make millions off this trial ! 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
No, the plaintiffs are. They are using sandy hook for money
In one pocket, out the other if the jury do their job.
Why can CNN report on lies, but not Alex Jones?
So if it is wrong for CNN, then why is okay for Alex Jones then?
CNN can be sued for defamation just like AJ and have been.
CNN has lost defamation cases, what makes Jones special?
Because CNN works for he us government. CNN helps the government spread their war mongering agenda.
Why was the coroner laughing during news coverage?
Maybe he was nervous and overwhelmed.
@@Vindsus86 please rewatch and see if you still believe that
@@jimstetson7952 No, it's of course far more believable that people would stage this big event and everything that that would entail, only to send out a coroner who can't stay in character? Really? I think it's far more likely that this was an overwhelmed coroner who was trying to keep it together during a press conference than an actor who couldn't keep it together. Surely, if this was staged, they would have picked someone for that role who wouldn't come off as odd in any way.
@@jimstetson7952 oh and Alex is saying that he believes now that the shooting happened so... Are you calling him a liar?
@@Vindsus86 noone said it didn't happen just not like they said it did FBI involvement is written all over it
Clown show court
This kangaroo court is everything wrong with america.
where is 'statue of limitation?" what happened 10 years ago we bring it up now? CROOKS!
It's "statute."
@@zxy78267 same root
The judge is so clearly biased and treats defense counsel so unfairly
The judge is a joke, so slanted…..I haven’t watched Alex more than 10 min in my life, but can tell he is not receiving a fair trial
You forget that he has been found guilty because he ignored his time in court...this is a damages case.
@@kevindennis4073 didn’t forget….the judge should not favor either side. You are lying to yourself if you think that is not the case
@@LH-ov5rs poor Alex. Lol. He deserves everything he gets.
He's been found liable by default. He had four years to present a defense and didn't. His own corporate representative testified that Alex hadn't complied with discovery.
@@DB-yk2pt what a misogynistic opinion to suggest the judge can’t control her emotions. bigoted really
God bless Alex Jones and his lawyers.
A.J. is a lying psychotic P.O.S.
Why?
I would like to know why.
@@stephanieames66 God bless Stephanie Ames, why not?
@@bike6626 God bless Bike 66, why not?
This judge is awful. She just keeps threatening a toddler and not following through. Her words are meaningless.
I’ve honestly never seen anything like this before. It’s like they just want AJ to bend over and take it up the rear! They don’t want him to defend himself whatsoever. I’m from the UK and I thought America had a fairer judiciary but I can see it’s so open to bias with no real comeback.
It's a penalty hearing. To determine what he owes. Not a criminal case.
I think you may not understand the circumstances here
AJ has already lost by default and been found liable; this trial is solely to determine the amount he will pay in damages.
Pattis is out of line and he knows it.
This judge is a tyrant. Liberal activist. Kangaroo court. So what if he thinks the government would do such a thing as fake it or be complicit in it. He has a right to think and speak. It starts with him, then they censor YOU.
Scam court
I love how hoax is in the title.. the whole thing is a bagel operation
Huh?
A bagel operation?
@@trustknowwaunful You can't have conspiracy chuds without antisemitism. It's just the way it be.
@@trustknowwaunful Yes.. Can you elaborate?
A lot of times (all the time) when you people make empty accusations what you really mean to say is "this hurts my feelings".
I predict you'll make another baseless accusation by calling it a "kangaroo court", and never actually getting around to explaining why.. just one empty accusation after another.
@@rogerout8875 because Alex Jones told them what to think about it so that's what they think about it.
This court room looks strange to me . All new tables….is this even real???
of course it is
Your buddy Alex Jones was in the courtroom. Why don't you ask him if it's a stage. 🤔
The world must be fascinating when everything confuses you.
That's clearly a green screen peeking out from behind the judge!!!
It’s all CGI.
If you can’t see this is a show on a stage there is no help for you.
Alex surely tried turning it into one yesterday. I get why Pattis decided to send him home.
These people are all actors and there really is no trial.