San Francisco's Most Exclusive Sinking High-Rise
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- Let's take a look at what's happening in California as we begin our deep dive into the sinking tower of San Francisco.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣 𝙏𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙎𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙝 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 showcases Josh Porter’s expert analysis of the tragic Surfside condominium collapse. Josh’s ability to explain complicated material in a way understandable to anyone has created a high demand for his instruction. You can get it right here for free, at your leisure.
• Champlain Towers South
The 𝙊𝙣 𝙋𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 offers viewers a deep dive into Josh Porter's decades of experience in the construction industry.
• On Point
In the 𝙊𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙅𝙤𝙗 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 we take you out of the studio to where the real action happens, the job site.
• On the Job
The 𝙊𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝙊𝙣𝙚 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 contains interviews with industry professionals discussing everything related to condominiums, construction, and engineering.
• One on One
Building Integrity Supports Crossroads Hope Academy. To Donate to Crossroads Hope Academy, please use the following link:
www.crossroads...
To see more videos about Crossroads and the amazing work they are doing, please watch the following playlist: • Crossroads Hope Academy
#BuildingIntegrity #Milleniumtower #Leaningtowerofsanfrancisco
Disclaimer: Nothing contained within this video should be construed as legal advice. Building Integrity makes no claims of its own regarding the guilt or innocence or liability otherwise of any legal entities mentioned in any of their videos. These videos are made for news/informational and educational purposes only.
I’m a San Francisco area geologist and I can say that building on these materials is like building on jello. I can’t believe they didn’t use piles drilled into the bedrock. The City also has responsibility for approving this plan and the fix, if it can be fixed, is being charged at least partially to the taxpayers! I also worked my whole career at another high-rise on this very corner and saw the damage there from the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. My personal opinion, after drilling and testing this material for decades, and given the extreme weight of the building, is that the building should be razed - it’s a risk to not only residents, but to public safety in this dense urban area.
Amazing that the taxpayers are footing the bill for the mistakes made by the developers and whatever office in the city approved it. Kim, why is there so much massive development being permitted in that area?
“Razed” sounded like razor, which brought me the next thought….can they disassemble top half and leave only half of building? Test for a few years to see if it helped and then do all the other fixing? It’s probably the stupidest question of the year.
@@jean6061 You're kidding right? $$$
I always wondered about 50 Fremont nearby, and how it held up in that event. Overall, do you think the skyscrapers of SF did well in the last quake?
If it has started to tilt more just from driving down more poles I can imagine quite horribly what a quake will do. Safety distance would be a mile from that building given all the secondary damage and dust that would occur from it falling.
Structural engineer here. I was mesmerized by the Surfside videos and couldn't get enough information. Some excellent lessons in that series. Now I'm super interested in what we will learn from this one. It gives me some inspiration when I see Josh's videos. I aspire to teach and know as much.
@@oakmot5477 this is very very sad. How do these people get away with building a building that can give way and start to lean or even collapse as in the tower that collapsed in Florida? Did they not learn from the condo collapse in Florida? Geez. A million and a half and you’re place is falling down when it’s brand new? What a mess!
@@gracieg7601 Umm, this leaning highrise in SF was FINISHED 12 years BEFORE the condo collapse in Surfside, FL... plus they are built with very different methods, so no lessons to be transferred... in fact, it appears that *the only thing done RIGHT on the CTSouth condo in FL was THE FOUNDATION* ... just the opposite of the debacle in Frisco...
Troy…I am NOT an engineer of any kind. But, Josh has made almost all of his Surfside and now this building’s videos so interesting and understandable that I NEED to see the next one coming out.
The trial was expected to last a year; however, a settlement was reached a few months later.
Site today[
After the demolition of the Harmon, the foundation was filled in and the site was paved over to serve as a extension of the plaza for the nearby The Shops at Crystals. In April 2021, the site was sold to a developer who intends to build a retail complex on the site.
My dad is an engineer. Much respect to you intellectuals seriously.
What I don’t understand is why the developer wasn’t forced to buy back the units. They knew about the problem as they continued to sell units, without disclosing the defect to buyers.
If you don't understand why the developer wasn't forced to buy back, you don't understand California's Woke politics..
@@torrarosa7064 Wouldn't California's "woke politics" benefit the person and screw the business? This situation seems opposite.
@@shadowfox-nf6zi Depends on which woke politicians are in business with the businesses. 🤔
I don’t even know what “woke” word means…but if it has to do with politics then I REALLY don’t want to know.
@@Grauenwolf The people who constantly think about skin color are the true racists.
The absolutely amazing, inconprehensible thing about this building is, that with a project cost of $350 million, they could have driven ALL the pilings down to bedrock for an extra $4 million dollars, slightly more than a 1% increase in total expenditure. Estimates are that it is going to cost up to $500 million to fix this thing, or more likely compensate condo owners and tear it down. Unbelievable.
if those two are even close to equal in value (compensate and rebuild vs fix) i'd go for the rebuild ... would you trust a "don't worry we fixed the problem" even if they blew 500M to implement it?
Probably the contractor received a bonus if he finished the job ahead of schedule. It always comes down to “Follow the Money”.
I call that "tripping over dollars to pick up nickels". Wrong people with the wrong qualifications and motivations making wrong decisions. Is anyone really surprised by this though?
Those figures are incorrect.
@@aartbluestoke3352 Yeah, they're not going to be able to fix it. It's a teardown.
I’ve lived in San Francisco for 35 years, and the thing my friends & I still cannot comprehend is how it could be legal to build anything that big in this city without anchoring it in hard, hard stone, *particularly* in an area built in part on top of _rubble from the last huge earthquake_.
Simply astonishing.
Reference reading Gold Rush Port by James P. Delgado good history of how the fill was created
The government is full of people who got to their position by the Peter Principal.
You mean the "Peter Payoff Principle"?! 🤑🤫🫢🙄
I bet this becomes a story about everybody wanting to make a ton of money but no one wanting to spend a dime. Worst thing I've heard about this building is that the foundation was designed for a steel structure and then the building was changed to concrete. Can't wait to hear you dig in to this mess in future episodes.
Just imagine this to turn out to be true! My trust issues are gonna worsen...
the people that made the money are the ones that sold the units, and then they go away
Usual story, then.
@@BgMasterGames Trust? Believe me, once you hit 50 or so, all 'trust' in human nature evaporates! ;)
I forget the number, but it was said that they cheaped out by something like $50-100M by not piling to bedrock (it's deep there). That's big money, but on a multi billion project with extreme prices on the units, it's not insane to say they should and could have done it.
There are engineering professors that say the as built foundation could have been sufficient, but on a highly prestigious project? It makes me think of the Towering Inferno scene where Newman says "Code's not enough for that building!"
Just the fact that one of the players in this drama is named "Mr. Hamburger", already promises that these videos will be a fun ride!
Ronald Hamburger...soooo Ronald McDonald???
Willing to put money on the pronunciation is like "Hamburg, Germany." 👌
I think part of the issue was mayor mccheese and the hamburglar being put in charge of the approvals
The fact that you can talk about "Mr. Hamburger's fix" and keep a straight face is impressive.
Hamburger needs a Helper.
@@envisionelectronics Groan. Great pun.
Trying to keep it professional
Geologist here....looking forward to the series...especially the quake part.
Tim, this is taking place in my city San Fran. It's all the talk here as you might think. Million dollar condos. People aren't happy. (I don't own one to be sure) ;-) I'll notify people around here that he'll be covering this. I'm looking forward to it.
Thank you for continuing to educate us on the engineering aspect of these buildings!
I’m a geologist, too, hi.
@@Ron4885 hope you will share an occasional update with us. Thx for your cmt.
Glad I'm not involved with this mess.
Rock on Tim 🤘🏻
I live in Seattle, and like San Francisco, it is built on landfill. Any question about skyscraper earthquake worthiness begins with the statement that all foundations go to the bedrock. When I learned that this building's foundation consisted of toothpicks inserted into mud, I couldn't believe it. In my opinion, the building is terminally ill, and the city and the owners are just kidding themselves. I'm looking forward to this series.
"Toothpicks inserted into mud." This is the BEST description I've seen of this foundation! Perfect visualization!
Venice is toothpicks in mud. It's also not full of skyscrapers. But sticks in mud actually work surprisingly well sometimes.
Clay actually. All the 1850s landfill was very shallow, and also long gone, partly when the previous building was built, and also because they dug down so deep, any remaining landfill was trucked away.
@@JamesMiller530 So clay is just how much better than "landfill" -- ? When I was a student at UC Irvine, I saw them truck away tons of clay/mud and replace it with a better type of soil from elsewhere. That was so they could build the new student center, which was just a few stories tall-- maybe 4 stories plus a basement?
@@exrobowidow1617Stick a toothpick in a pile of clay vs sand and see which "sticks" better. I live a few blocks from MilLEANium Tower and watched every step of construction. Previous brick building removed, top layer of soil removed, landfill removed, sand originally from Yerba Buena Cove removed, until there was a giant hole multiple stories underground. The friction piles definitely do not go into any landfill, mud, or sand, but should have gone down to bedrock.
Hey, at least it's not in an area prone to earthquakes or anything. That could be really bad!
Imagine? If this multi-ton structure without pilings down the bedrock was just sitting on top of what would become essentially Liquefaction sediment during an earthquake event that happens without fail every 50 years and would bring a tower this massive down? Thank god this building isn’t in, say, San Francisco! What a recipe for disaster that would be! /s
@@colin-nekritz
I don’t think you got the irony of his comment
@@bamboozled9120 Colin got the irony all right... and expounded upon it! We are laughing now, with a grim laugh knowing what could happen at any moment, due to the human-caused problems with this "structure."
@@colin-nekritz Well, if you can keep the building somewhat level while it's rapidly sinking, you can provide a lot more levels of underground parking to the residents.
yes, and good thing we have a definitive solution and a definitive idea of when the next earthquake will be :')
Looking forward to another series. I'm not even in the building trades other than more homeowner work than anyone I know but this is so interesting and you present it so well and make it very enjoyable.
Well said, Also nice that maybe this, at least at this point is not an autopsy on a disaster. Perhaps the attention Josh brings might result in some action.
Josh is one of the most knowledgeable on RUclips,
Agreed.
Also, you should put "Millennium Tower" in your description so that this video comes up for appropriate searches.
property value will be decimated. Is all about money .....
A lot of people are like, "Oh man, what if this building falls down?" -- now I haven't watched this video yet (going to shortly) but the biggest issue is the plumbing and elevators and how they will stop working in just a few short years at the rate the building is sinking.
This building will probably eventually be torn down but a lot of money is trying to keep it up.
Also, I think the original design was steel but than they went with concrete and the weight went up like 2-2.5x
Plumbing and elevators is the least of their worries if there's an earthquake.
I live in SF. Follow the money to learn why the builders were not required to drill down to bedrock. A couple of windows popped out of the highrise over the past several years - never learned why. Also, the plumbing is beginning to fail, with some waste water pipes which have begun tilting upwards, which will necessitate the demolition and rebuild of walls in some of the units. There is a video on line of a marble in an upper floor unit rolling across what is supposed to be a flat floor. The owners of that unit cut their losses and moved out.years ago Every few months there's another meeting about fixing the building, during whih time the building continues to sink and the tilt increases. Ronald Hamburger has stated the building is safe to live in, with the caveat that the fix (whatever that turns out to be) should be done sooner rather than later. The tower is situated in a very densely populated area of the city, surrounded by others highrises. The land on which the tower is built was once the fishing grounds of the Ohlone Native Amerians. SF Bay is swamp and landfill; Montgomery Street used to be the natural shoreline. Not all highrises here are have pilings that go down to bedrock. There are a lot of new highrises going up currently in the South Van Ness/Market Street area. Under one of those new highrises runs an alluvial fan (basically wet sediment) from an underground stream, and the building stands on a foundation and pilings not drilled to bedrock. There are many streams and other water ways upon which buildings have been constructed over the years. Much of the sediment is the wreckage from old sailing ships from the Bay to Montgomery Street. I hope the MT is safely taken down before it has a catostrophic failure.
They can't demo it it's too tall. And leaning.
@@QuarioQuario54321 that just means you can't do a (cheaper) fast demo, anything is demolishable given enough money. Even if the building ends up condemned though, the question then becomes the cost of demo (+who will pay for it) vs the cost of stabilization+lost usable land.
@@tomfeng5645 It's unsafe to do that. It's leaning and large. There's already tons of stuff on the lower floors so 50 stories up it would require doing things that nobody has ever done before so the margin of error is extremely small and nobody knows what to do or how to do it. And there is still the risk that they will end up killing people or causing an earthquake or causing billions of dollars of damage.
Yikes! Those huge cracks in the basement, we’ve all seen this before right?
Oh relax... didn't you see the staples across the cracks? I'm sure that will fix it...
@@williamevans6522 Those weren't even actually staples... They were crack width gauges to monitor the crack growth.
But I'm sure it will all be fine... (cancelling my trip to San Francisco)
It isn't dangerous or anything, just look at Champlain Towers South. Oops , that's right that one fell! Maybe the people inside should leave NOW!.
You'd have thought engineering standards for building very tall buildings on reclaimed land in an active earthquake zone in the USA might have been more rigorous than they appear to have been here.
I would have, but I don't now.
Welcome to San Francisco.
Except that this is San Francisco. The Pelosi’s were probably involved with the initial project as well.
Ikr. I have no idea how this thing was allowed to be built. Smh
Having lived through the Loma Prieta Earthquake in 1989, there is absolutely no way this building could be considered "safe" for any similar (or higher) seismic event. Imagine being a resident in this tower if/when a temblor hits! Unbelievable this wasn't anchored into bedrock at the outset. Looking forward to this series.
And Loma Prieta wasn't even that big of an earthquake. It was moderate at best. The faultlines in the area are capable of generating much, much larger quakes...
So even if they use Loma Prieta as a baseline, it's a dumb baseline.
This has become, as we used to say back in Texas, a damned GOAT RODEO!
After having watched every video in your excellent Surfside series, I am really looking forward to watching all of the videos in your Millennium Tower series, Josh. You do EXCELLENT work!
Same here!
This is wild, at this rate they are surely going to have to demolish it at some point soon for safety reasons. Those poor residents, what a nightmare.
no one who lives there is poor, im fairly certain of that
@@jsnsk101 poor as in bad luck. Not financially
@@AreeyaKKC I hope Nancy Polisy has a place there. It's so hard to feel sorry for the elite.
@@dealsfromvirginia1773 I live in a 3rd world country so I understand. Farmer vs social elite.
it cannot be demolished because of its size and leaning
I lived in SF when this issue first came up. It’s insane and most residents can’t get out of the building wo taking a huge loss. The city is so corrupt and letting things slide… money talks in the city, ignoring pleas of residents. We voted down many projects but then developers bribed multiple politicians to push through projects ruining green spaces, views and the charm of the city.
Same thing is happening to Colorado. Fill up all the open space and animal habitats with $500k little houses. Heartbreaking.
In engineering they say "never trust a truss" in politics they say "never trust a politician".
Doesn't it sound a bit like the city offices in Surfside? Keep the problems hidden, work with the developer, and hope no one gets hurt. Amazing!
@@mariodumais2153 In the UK we've actually got a senior politician called Truss. She's a favourite to replace Boris Johnson, god help us.
@@hypsyzygy506 trust me - i'm not crazy abour Biden but I sure as hell voted for him just to get that flaming cheeto out of my WhiteHouse!
On January 13, 2022 Hamburger, the repair project chief engineer, told CNN: ""Since we anticipate that the rate of tilting will continue to decrease with time, and will eventually stop, we do not anticipate the building would ever tilt enough to become unsafe," he said. "I have performed analyses that indicate the building can withstand at least 70 inches of tilt to the west and 30 inches to the north before its ability to resist earthquakes would be compromised."
Imagine having to live in a unit that is 70 inches out of plumb.
I have a bridge for sale Mr. Hamburger.
I think the people living in the building should come together and invite Mr. Hamburger to live in one of the expensive top floor apartments.
I have a feeling Mr. Hamburger sometimes forgets where to put the decimal point in his calculations.
So he's named after a delicious beef patty AND is an aspiring comedian?
With plumbing drains pitching at 1/8”/foot, you are probably pooping uphill in some of these units.
Yes, that's a known issue with the building, as is the plumbing in general because of the warping/bending issues.
Lol you are absolutely right
...someones, pool table needs a gyroscope, for balance and '' level-ability '.................on the upper 40 floors....'' honey, i re-levelled the table, for supper '' !
The disintegrating shear wall and warped foundation! WTF?! I had no idea the building was literally crumbling.
I'm glad you decided to do series on this boondoggle, and I'm looking forward to more videos!
@@sjb3460 Starts at 11:27 in this video.
OMG when a big quake hits and liquefaction occurs...
What a fantastic metaphor for the entire city. A falling building, surrounded by a sewer of feces and needles.
A giant with feet of clay in a waste land
Wow! This new series is going to be great. I have been following the Millennium Tower issue for several years now only through news soundbites. I can't wait to see how the sausage is made with your insights and knowledge of these issues. This is very exciting stuff. Thank you for covering it.
As someone who lives in Northern California (thankfully FAR FAR away from SF) thank you for addressing this situation. It honestly doesn’t surprise me something like this happened in SF, sadly Millennium towers is a nutshell of the issues of the city, not just the engineering practice but the planning committee as well as how the city has been running itself. There used to be pride of SF, especially the architecture of the older buildings (the homes have lasted so long because they were made of local redwoods that has been able to maintain healthy material against the natural testing grounds of being right next to the ocean.) Now it’s an embarrassment the whole West Coast. So I am excited for you to cover this building.
This is fantastic! So looking forward to the series. Largest fail I was ever a part of was a form blow out during a concrete pour for a bridge in Vermont! Not enough bracing. “she’s not goin’ anywhere” turned into “she’s gone” Thanks for your work on your channel.
That must have been a cleanup nightmare...
Normally the "she's not goin anywhere" incantation usually works.
I can't wait. Here is a question: When does it get so dangerous to the public that the building has to come down? And why has they not been talked about. Are they just waiting for the thing to come down on its own?
I’m looking forward to hearing your analyses. I live in SF, so have been following this for years. Be sure to separate out decisions by owners, developers, outside engineers, local building department, their consultants, etc. There’s not just one line of decisions here.
Also, recall the line of embarrassing major construction failures here lately: after the 1989 Loma Prieta Bay Bridge failure, we built a new multi-billion dollar cable-stayed bridge which immediately had serious engineering problems of water in the main tower that required extraordinary fixes. We built a new Transbay Terminal (Millenium Tower neighbor) which within months developed a fatal crack in major steel structural support that required extraordinary quick fixes. Now this.
There may be engineering design problems in all of these, but they reveal very public failures of engineering management and oversight, and review of financial decisions by the Big Money people.
After underfunding civic maintenance for decades, it now feels as if we may not even be able to start with a clean sheet of paper and design and build new construction without a big box of million-dollar bandaids.
Ouch! Just doesn't make a lot of sense to put such heavy buildings on such unstable soil.
The $6.5billion New East Bay Bridge is NOT fixed. The dehumidifiers failed, the broken foundation bolts can not be replaced and the rusting cables under the roadway are grouted in and cannot be replaced among other problems. Calif is quietly but desperately spending billions attempting to keep it upright until the next moderate quake takes it down.
California is a Criminal Empire that is only good at acquiring power and wealth... not building things. Keep in mind only 20 cents of every dollar spent in CA. goes to the cause the rest goes into the pockets of the well connected and 100% Democrat
San Francisco is not a good for building large projects.
Oh my, I was following this story, but I didn't know there was a risk. All the "officials" and "experts" were assuring everything was under control. Hmmm. no wonder I'm always skeptical.
Just like the WH.
As an engineer it's a pleasure to listen to another engineer from a different discipline explain the details and complexities of construction.
Please don't feel you have to dumb your explanations down for a RUclips audience. As you can see from the comments you have a lot of well educated followers who appreciate your explanations.
I really wish he would dumb it down for me!
You're videos series are phenomenal, looking forward for all of these.
I know nothing about engineering but I'm very curious to learn / understand how things work and I enjoy very much your videos. Thanks Josh ! Bonjour de Montréal, Québec.
I'm in the same boat as you, I really feel the way he explains everything makes it so I can retain more information.
So excited to see you are doing a series on this building! You have a gift for breaking things down and explaining the principles of construction
thanks, Josh. i was hoping you'd do a series in this building.
You probably meant “on” or “about” …. We don’t really want Josh to go “in” this death trap … 😉
Glad you took on the challenge Josh. I have watched all the news reports over the last year. I understand this was originally designed to be a steel frame bldg but ended up being concrete. So did they modify the foundation to compensate for the added weight.
- Obviously driving piles down 60 ft and not to bedrock was to reduce building cost, but a heavy bldg. in an earthquake zone with soil with a propensity to liquify seems like a highly risky move. Again putting piles to bedrock on only one side as a fix, is kicking the can further down the road. The dishing of the foundation slab is an indication of other issues. Was their any safety factor built into short pilings in that type of soil on such a heavily loaded bldg.
From where I sit I suspect it is a combination of under design and cheap skating the pilings in not going to bedrock. That is simply bad judgement and poor design and has nothing to do with the transit authority de-watering their site. It seems that Engineering is all about erring on the side of caution. Not the case here.
Right Mr Pan. There used to be a margin, for longevity and safety, in ANY engineering of '' stuff ''. In electronics/electrical, it used to be about a 25 or 30 percent, PLUS in any ' ratings' of said equipment. Meaning it was '' designed '' to be rated that much higher. (For safety and length-of-life of a product). So, for example your drill is rated at 120 volts @ 3 amps. Then the normal power used, would be 70-75 percent of that rating. Same as gas/diesel engines. Actual usage, would be around the same said 'rating'. Today, there is NO EXTRA MARGIN, designed into 'stuff'. The rating, is ALLREADY MAXED OUT. Alot of electric drills' these days, are mostly glorified 'toys '. With cheap plastic, as well, and some 'stuff' has very shoddy materials, inside. Good day, sir.
I am really interested in this new series. I always learn a lot from your videos. Thank you for doing them. It's complex information, but you make it understandable for non-engineers.
Going from a steel frame on a pad to reinforced concrete ... I've read it's the heaviest building West of the Mississippi and the change saved the developer ~$4 million, about the price of a couple of units.
The heaviest reinforced-concrete building west of the Mississippi, not the heaviest overall. 686 million pounds of structure, plopped down in mud...
Josh Porter is on a new series!! I'm ready to watch every detail he finds. As a South Florida resident, and construction worker for decades, I've come to appreciate the engineering that goes into every project I have worked on. Thank God none of those buildings were ever damaged or destroyed. I'm going to be glued to this channel forever. It helps me understand how structures are designed and common failure points, so I can watch out for these as a building goes up from the ground. Thank you Josh for taking on this series.
I live here in the SF Bay Area, & I’ve been glued to your series about CTS from Day 1. I’ve also been following the Millennium Tower saga here locally, but am EXCITED to now hear all the details & reasoning from my favorite engineer! Thank you so much, & know that we’re here listening & hoping for a real solution. ❤️
I'm a carpenter that worked on the interiors of the Millennium Tower. I have also performed a lot of concrete work. When I started on the 4th floor, I looked around at the shell, and my first question was: "How high are they going with this thing?!" It's a MASSIVE structure, with extremely dense concrete, on bay fill.
I was working for the design/build general contractor, whose forte is poured in place concrete structures. My understanding is that the general convinced the developers to switch building styles. I'm assuming steel frame was switched to poured in place concrete. I know for a fact that no soils engineer was ever retained. As hard as it is to believe, I also understand that the basic foundation was not modified for the new design. It's now estimated that driving the piles down to bedrock would have cost an additional $4 million.
I don't understand how I have never seen the general's name mentioned in any of the litigation or articles from the media.
_I'm assuming steel frame was switched to poured in place concrete._ FALSE. That would never ever be done on a "whim", and would require re-starting the LENGTHY CALIFORNIA approval process at square 0... and would NEVER be up to the GenCon... also steel never used for residential--too much SWAY... SMH.
_I know for a fact that no soils engineer was ever retained._ FALSE. They're called GEOTECHNICAL Engineers, and several are listed in the lawsuit.
_It's now estimated that driving the piles down to bedrock would have cost an additional $4 million._ SOURCE?... _crickets_ you can't do anything below-grade in SFO for $4MIL...
_I don't understand how I have never seen the general's name mentioned in any of the litigation..._ As long as he followed the sealed plans, he's not on the hook.
I have no engineering background whatsoever but I'm finding your videos fascinating. You are brilliant at explaining what's going on in a way that I believe most people can thourghly understand. I just can't wait for the next video in this series!!!
Concrete cheaper than steel? I thought the whole idea of steel skyscrapers was to allow taller buildings, and old mortar and brick was obsolete. Concrete is just mortar's offspring, after all. Maximum height before steel was about 25 stories or so. This is more than double the height.
Concrete is cheaper than steel frame, absolutely. And if you do it right, there's no problem.
The Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world is reinforced concrete, built on sand. It seems to be doing alright...
The planned Jeddah Tower, at 1000 meters tall is also reinforced concrete construction.
Nothing wrong with the Millennium Tower from ground level up, but the foundation is fu*ked up...
As entertaining as this is, as rich as these people are, what can be done to avoid a collapse? I do not want to see people die. So glad you are covering this. The more coverage before something happens the better.
The taxpayers are paying for it.
Just wanted to say that I love this channel. My father worked for a building company, and as a kid, he would take me around various sites he thought cool or interesting and talk about them. Or, let's be fair, most of the time talk about what he thought they did wrong (he worked for a small company, they were big giants, and in his opinion, sloppy workers). This channel feels like a more in-depth revisit of my childhood, than you for making me interested in buildings again.
I watched the full CTS series and now the Millenium series. You have chosen an excellent story that is very intriguing.. I'm sure we "non-engineers and engineers" will enjoy watching all the episodes as you explain a give us your opinions and knowledge..
Thanks Josh, really looking forward to this series. We've had a couple of buildings with issues like this here in Sydney Australia
Which buildings? I'd be curious to learn more
@@ChrisRWilcox (1) Opal Tower, Olympic Park (2) Mascot Towers, Sydney
This is going to be phenomenal. Given the excellence with which you explained Champlain Towers, I, and I am sure others, will be anxious to see every episode! Jim Atlanta
Liquefaction is the key here. Ground soil is soft and water laden. When the ground shakes, soil loses cohesive strength. Vibration from drilling is causing ground weakness which is why tilting is getting worse.
Yep. I think by the end of the year they will throw their hands up and decide it's a teardown.
Thank you! I posted about this upthread and just scrolled down to see this. I lived in Seattle and worked on a report re a big earthquake or Rainier blowing would level much of south Seattle EXCEPT some of the building that either happened to be on bedrock or they had the sense to drilled down to bedrock. The Millennium Tower at least at the moment is just a floating on a sea waiting for even the slightest storm to tip it over.
@@colin-nekritz Floating on a Sea of Mud is an excellent analogy. Interestingly, drilling for the "fix" reveals an interesting possible solution. If drilling causes tilting on the side of drilling, opposite side drilling could be used to counter tilt the building back to vertical. Foundation would still have to be anchored to bedrock with four sided support of the foundation.
@@encinobalboa This brings up an image of trying to fix a wobbly table; cut the long leg, one of the other legs is too long, eventually you end up with tiny legs. Your way eventually half the building will be beneath the surface 😆
@@trek520rider2 Chasing. I see your point and humor. Happily for the rest of us, this is not our problem.
As this sinks into the earth, will the 'soils' simply compress vertically or does the material displace laterally as well, and effect neighboring properties with unexpected forces?
good thought, im interested to know that now too
I’m going to guess water content in the soil will play a (significant?) factor in answering this. I’m curious if liquifaction (even outside of an earthquake) could become a concern given the weight of the building and the rate it is sinking
@@beglitchery that very site used to be under water (san fran bay). it's built on landfill.
@@Numantino312 Insane, isn't it? I was teaching a student about earthquakes, which led to a study of liquefaction and then the Millenium Tower. It does not take an engineering degree to realize what a huge mistake it is to build there - much less without driving piers into bedrock! Show the plan to any middle school science class that's learned about soils and liquefaction and earthquakes and they'll tell you not to build there.
@@jean6061 Sometimes bedrock just isn't available at all - it is so far down, yet tall buildings are still being built using one of the types of friction piles, so it is really just a question of proper analysis and dimensioning, which was obviously not the case here.
Thx as always - fantastic detail. Can’t wait for part II ! Your teaching skills are awesome!
I'm really happy that you've started adding metric system references. It really makes us non-US viewers able to enjoy your videos even more. I am looking forward to the new series. Thank you so much!
I've been in this building many times when I used to deliver furniture... This was back 2009-2012. You'd never know it wasn't a solid building. Wonder how many others are like this out there
This is nearly to the level of a public service IMO. Great content, I cannot wait for the analysis and presentation!
Has anyone talked to the carpenter crews who did the top few floors? The upper third of all floors? Upper half? If it was beginning a serious tilt long before completion the hands-on workers would have surely known it and most likely reported it to superiors. Might speak to timeline of who knew what and when they knew of it.
I recall testimony from some flavor of interior decor contractor that they were having trouble squaring with plumbs.
@@sjb3460 Yes,and installing many things that need to be plumb and/or level but don't quite work with the out of plumb building. Kind of like doing remodel in a 150yo house that is out of plumb,out of level,and out of square,it's tough and takes longer.
Josh, another great one. Please cover at some point how will this building be demolished, since that remains a very significant possibility.
.....no need to. Demolished, will happen NATURALLY when it leans/slides/sinks with the rest of the whole SanFran bay area......google Mr. Parsons' take on this: he is an engineering geophysicist, with proof, from satellite imagery of various kinds. Yellow areas, are sinking in the Bay area there...... Greed killed the people.......from the whole 'peoples ' involved, in modern
'' business ''...................there will be maybe many newer buildings, doing the same thing.
I can't wait to see your series on this!!! I have really enjoyed your honesty and expertise of your Champlain Tower South video's! I can see you have a passion for doing the right thing!
Not to mention, if you look at the risk of liquification during a seismic event the highest risk runs from the Embarcadero down market and mission to van ness. It’s basically where they built all the high rise buildings.
I have followed you throughout the Champlain Towers South analysis and have thoroughly enjoyed that series of videos and I am looking forward to this series. I find this subject to be very interesting and although I have no structural engineering knowledge whatsoever, you explain things very well for those of us who are not "in the know" and help us to all make sense of these things and why things happen as they do in pertaining to structural failures and I appreciate that. Good job Josh!!! 👍👍👍
Season 2 is shaping up to be a good one! Adding more popcorn to the grocery list...
So excited for this video.
The original contractor on the Tower got the city engineer to change the depth of the piers to not have to go to bedrock. So you might want to talk about that scandal. This saved the contractor millions in costs.
Only 4 million saved for a 500 Million fix.
Oh I'm definitely here for this. Not an engineer, or have any aspirations of becoming one, but I lived in the south bay which is about 45 miles south of SF for nearly 3 decades. This is super relevant to me given the close proximity to where I resided for most of my life.
45 miles is not close.
@@markpreston6930 One can take city public transportation from where I was to the city in about an hour. In other areas that may not be close. In the Bay, it's not close but it's also not very far. I had many friends over the years who made that drive up every weekend, or would make that commute 5 days a week. It's not as far as you think.
Oh my god the spalling in that basement is terrifying.
Seems like their Hamburger helper was luke warm at best. I’ll see myself out.
Yeah, a guy named 'Ronald Hamburger' coming to save us from disaster. We have now entered cartoon-world...
This video is a lot better than I expected.
I think that as the building sinks a floor at a time, they can add another floor to the top floor. The people who USED to live on the street level floor, can now enjoy penthouse views as compensation for their troubles. The old first floor now becomes really nice underground parking. Problem solved.
All I want to know is 1) which way is it going to fall and 2) which surrounding buildings is it going fall on.
Looking forward to this series. I think the most important question is, just to set the scene: If we gave you the money, would you live there for 2 years? Would you even enter the building?
I would be afraid to even walk by the building!!
Thank you for covering this. As a lifelong SF Bay Area resident who witnessed the 1989 Loma Prieta quake firsthand, I’m concerned about the safety of this building and that entire Mission Bay/ Embarcadero area in SF.
I’m looking forward to your review and analysis of the potential effects of earthquake activity on this building. As an Architect, I find your videos incredibly informative and easy to follow, and I appreciate your focus on design standards and ethics. Do you teach any CEU courses? They would be far more beneficial to our industry than another Lunch & Learn by a product vendor.
LoL, as a vendor that does a lot of Lunch & Learns, I take exception to that comment.
Ohhh.. I'm hooked.. I will be anxiously awaiting your upcoming episodes, No one explains the engineering better then you!
From what I have heard about this building there seems to be plenty of incompetence and possibly corruption under the surface.
Above and below the surface.
This series is gonna be super interesting as everyone involved is pointing fingers and nobody taking blame for what should’ve happened before it was built. Thanks for covering this! I’ve enjoyed all of your videos since the beginning of Surfside
One of the articles I read was saying that some of the cracking and spalling does extend into the basement of the adjacent mid rise, it's just not got the headline grabbing tilt. I think it's all the one big engineering problem, with the movement of the skyscraper causing damage to the low tower. It was a while ago that I read that, and I'm fuzzy on the detail, I just remember something about problems in the basement of the mid rise as well.
I'm sure you're already on it, but liquefaction. It's a possible factor in accelerated movement with the remedial piling, but a more major concern in an 8+ quake.
I once went to school for civil engineering, but became an artist/carpenter. I look forward to your lessons.
Those pics of the spalling in the basement...👀!!
Hey Josh! I'm looking forward to following along on this adventure with you as I did throughout the Champlain Tower collapse series. I find the topic and your explanations fascinating as well as enlightening and educational. I'm just an intellectually curious old guy. ;-) Thanks for what you do and for making it understandable!!
Finally! Thank you for covering this! Really excited to hear your take on this
Looking forward to this series!
Super excited for this series. Thank you for sharing as usual!
Armed with everything learned in your CTS videos, looking forward to your insights in this series. Always come away feeling smarter, having gotten a dose of education on a subject you present in such an intriguing fashion. Slightly 'soap opera-ish.'
Yes! Please do all building disasters. There is a channel called Plainly Difficult that covers disasters. You doing that with your knowledge will be cool af.
This building has been a local joke since construction started. First as a "Really? you want to spend that much on a condo unit while surrounded by mentally ill homeless people?", then later as the construction deficiencies became apparent, as a bit of schadenfreude.
There is another tower that is a laughing stock that is colloquially known as the Ionic Breeze Tower (the building equivalent of a comb-over). This building is One Rincon Hill... not falling down, but still a failure of architecture design for aesthetic reasons.
It was originally built as the headquarters for The Sharper Image, before they imploded. SI being known for their "Ionic Breeze" air purifiers. And of course their vibra...er...neck massagers.
So excited for this series.
Ooh, this is a meaty one. Stocking up on popcorn.
Sweet!! New series! Thanks Josh!
I look forward to seeing what you find out about this. My gut says this building is coming down one way or another. I just hope it is a demo, not a disaster.
As an engineer, adding piles to one side of the building makes me think of one word. "Bodge"
I like 'FUBARed'...
Is there some way to donate to your channel? Your videos are really incredible, there's no one else anywhere discussing these issues with the kind of detail and rigor that you do.
This is going to be SUCH a good video series!!!!!
I started watching this channel trying to better understand what happened at the Surfside condos in FL, and am looking forward now to learning about the Millennium Tower. As not an engineer, I really appreciate how thorough and understandable Josh’s explanations are - especially because I’ve never felt dumb or talked down to when listening to the complex information. Such a good job giving the info in a way that’s at exactly the right level to listeners that don’t have backgrounds in engineering, construction, or bureaucracy. Thank you, and Well Done Sir!
Fascinating! Glad no one has died in this one (yet. Can’t imagine an earthquake will keep that continuing)
I wonder if they are waiting for an earthquake to take it down because then insurance would take the brunt of the financial loss
As a former Building Official there is this important fact. Each model code has provisions protecting the Jurisdictions from any liability...
[A] 104.8 Liability. ... The building official or any subordinate shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit or proceeding that is instituted in
pursuance of the provisions of this code.
But there's this....''Intentional, malicious and grossly negligent conduct against code are not defensible under Sovereign Immunity.''
In a perfect world, the Building Official should do all in his/her power to protect their Jurisdiction by placing full responsibility where it belongs,
on the design team. Those are the ''boys and Girls'' listed on the cover of every set of drawings. They would call me Michael ''need
a special inspector'' Reyes!
In fact, NO SET of drawings would be released for construction without my being involved and approval. Why? Because the Building Official
is responsible...... that all work in the Jurisdiction complies with the codes and one very important fact! I'm there to protect my Jurisdiction
from these kinda claims. Let's hope the B.O. did their job!
Thanks for taking this on Josh. This is going to be a great series! Would you be able to tell us what is the absolute lean angle acceptable from an engineering perspective? 24° sounds pretty extreme!
That is a good question. What does 24" represent in degrees of angle on the lean? and how many more until in goes timber?
24 inches works out to about 0.2 degrees
The Leaning Tower of Pisa got to 5.5° but has been brought back to just less than 4°.
After a few degrees tilt the columns on the lower level will be so overloaded, cracking and crumbling will threaten to bring it down, straight down. Wouldn't fall like a tree...
Never gonna get there though. Even a 1 degree tilt would amount to the building leaning nearly 11 feet at the roof. Every resident would move out and they would tear it down long before then.
(If the foundation walls are already cracking, that's a whole different ballgame...)
@@johnbergstrom2931 Were you trying to be reassuring? I couldn't tell.
As a fan who first found you after the Seaside collapse, and coincidentally a Bay Area resident obsessed with the Millennium tower situation, I am ridiculously excited for this series!! 👏 👏 👏
First of all, I'm NOT a civil engineer, so this is just my thoughts. Are friction piles really a good idea in an area with a lot of earthquake activity? I've heard of soil liquifaction when subject to violent shaking. Seems that would nullify the friction piles and result in a disaster.
Cutting corners and pocketing _da kay$h_ is always in vogue... =:O
I poured the foundation for the Banner Estrella Medical Center in West Phoenix in 2004. It is a 5 story hospital building. The Foundation mat for this building is the same 10 foot steel reinforced mat as 645 foot Millennium Towers. The rebar in the hospitals mat is 1 inch rebar and the amount of rebar used looked insane to me at the time. The Millennium Towers has the same foundational mat for a building that is 12 times higher?! What gives? the hospital is 55 feet tall, the high rise is 645 feet tall. Why?
Purportedly the Millennium Tower slab has deformed (I.E a big bowl dip}and has cracks and spalling from what I have heard. A case of being under-engineered or the pilings did not work as engineered.
I'm looking forward to this series of videos!
I hope the engineers prevail on this one. Looks like their opening up a can of worms.
I'm no engineer but...seems like it's cheaper to put foundation piles to bedrock before you build the building!
shortcuts can endup costing more in the long run.
Since the piles to bedrock can only be put on the outside, it's certain that it won't make dishing any better
Excellent conclusion (about piles driven to bedrock at the start of construction) - and you're not even an engineer!