Climate change is a phenomenon that has been happening since the earth acquired an atmosphere billions of years ago. The climate outside of an occasional period of a few decades is constantly in flux. We are currently in a stable climate period where the temperatures have fluctuated up and down only a few degrees Celsius over a period of a few centuries for thousands of years. This is remarkably tame given the history of the climate which has swung from a global ice ball, to an ice free tropics. My problem is with those who claim humans are solely responsible for climate variability. This is utterly false. About the time we developed the ability to measure and record temperatures back in the 19th century, the planet began warming from a climate episode called 'The Little Ice Age,' during which the planet had an exceptionally cold climate. This warming has been hijacked by the climate activists and blamed on human activity. What raises a red flag for me is the fact that no climate change activist will include this normal, natural warming in their calculations. This makes me feel it's just political activism, not science at work. I deny the validity of this skewed narrative. That's where the thought process disconnect has occurred.
@@maywasp As opposed to the fake science referred to above "notice how the rise in CO2 drives a rise in temperature". I guess you could be right, Sean. There is actually no science in that statement.
Well that scared the shit out of me
puss
Gran's Stuff no u
Yeah....we're all gonna die.
(Shaking Intensifies)
Humans don't give a fuck if they kill the earth including themselves
boring
For two reasons.
I knew my ears are going to burst after 19th century.
I don’t understand the thought process of denying climate change.
"If it's not real, then I can't be a bad person for doing it"
It makes money.
Climate change is a phenomenon that has been happening since the earth acquired an atmosphere billions of years ago. The climate outside of an occasional period of a few decades is constantly in flux. We are currently in a stable climate period where the temperatures have fluctuated up and down only a few degrees Celsius over a period of a few centuries for thousands of years. This is remarkably tame given the history of the climate which has swung from a global ice ball, to an ice free tropics. My problem is with those who claim humans are solely responsible for climate variability. This is utterly false. About the time we developed the ability to measure and record temperatures back in the 19th century, the planet began warming from a climate episode called 'The Little Ice Age,' during which the planet had an exceptionally cold climate. This warming has been hijacked by the climate activists and blamed on human activity. What raises a red flag for me is the fact that no climate change activist will include this normal, natural warming in their calculations. This makes me feel it's just political activism, not science at work. I deny the validity of this skewed narrative. That's where the thought process disconnect has occurred.
me and the homies vibing to this absolute banger
*angry Medieval noises*
Спасибо! Это все должны слышать!
This song needs a drop!
Interesting technologies amazing story thank you for sharing this
Remember when this was mainstream news
Hiya, would I be able to use this sound for a promotional video? Thanks
*Garageband*
This scares me, why doesn't anybody care about climate change yet wtf is wrong with people.
İREMSU YORUMLARDA BENİ GÖRÜRSEN.. 3 KERE ÇALDILAR 2016DA TÜKÜRÜK YARIŞTIRIRDIK
Очень даже хорошо слышно, что человек натворил, начиная с 20го века.😢😢
MANBEARPIG
And it is still getting worse.
this is not music this is ear torture 😭
And out of sync, given there is extra sound that isn't part of the video's intent. : /
If you look at the real science, it is temperature driving CO2 rise, not the other way around
the real science ? As opposed to ?
@@maywasp As opposed to the fake science referred to above "notice how the rise in CO2 drives a rise in temperature". I guess you could be right, Sean. There is actually no science in that statement.