To be honest the best music melodys I make are randomly made and most of the time no real thought is put into it other then just feeling or hearing in My head what might fit next, mostly governed by what sound flow together. I dont really see AI doing much else differently in My opinion.
@@deadlyrobot5179 Ha yes I do that sometimes to Just random playing and out comes a great melody or sound out of nowhere that can then be used as a loop or added to. I find that when I remember those special bits and can replay them any time.
I am similar. I usually call these those "creative decisions" you make that make your tracks sound like, well, YOU! I mean sometimes i do attempt melodies and such with thoughts but i typically feel the creative decision and choice is far more important when putting the whole thing together. If that didnt make sense I apologize, i shouldn't comment on videos as soon as i get off work oof
@@rux_ton A big part of making music for Me is having no real plan most of the time and if there is one then be willing to change depending on the sounds development. Resampling My own music or making brand new samples opened up a whole new level of music making.
i'm looking forward to crossing wires between the different senses "bass drop in the style of hr gieger" "watercolor painting of coton eyed joe in the style of orbital unreal engine no logo"
Incredible stuff! I love love love this personally. I make music myself, but it's inevitable that tech is one of the only reasons I've ever been able to record anything that sounds radio-ready. I favor artistic statements when I sit down and actively listen (which is most times) but also do not shame or shun the other more dominant pattern. A few people recently even said "I really like your music, it doesn't distract me in the background" which was off-putting initially, but I find it now to be a compliment haha.
as an artist and aesthete this makes sad. i know big companies will strike rich but art will lose its essence and porpuse. primarly is an outlet and a way of expression for artists like me and a way to communite real-time events and feelings. what a sad times we're living in. hand me a tissue :,(
definitely agree that for everyone the perfect music is a combination of past feelings and heard music. therefore the individually created music will be quite outperform any mass music. similarly the successful musicians are made by listening and refining tune algorithm in their heads during a long time until once a hit comes out.
As far as "when" it is probably happening right now but I doubt we will experience any of this dystopian ideas in our lives, if anything we might experience the beginning. Thing is that while technology advances exponentially nowadays, we can still pretty much tell the difference between something "artificial" and something that was made by humans
Guess it's a matter of beeing a creator or a consumer. If music is good in any way and satisfies the consumers needs, then okay. But will all creators stop making music because AI is creating, too? If so, then okay, forget about them.
I see by your outfit that you are a cowboy" tell that THIS will ever be better written by a computer or performed than it was by roberto begnini in night on earth ;D and i strongly recommend to think about clsoely WHY there is an urge of humans to have a listen to music that is generated by computers rather than humans. my answer is simple: jsut to make more profit out of it. thats why they will bake your bread, write your music or perform it, cook your food, build your home etc etc...the question left out is just: what will happen to all the obsolete workers then?
ai will do everything, max 5 years, we are done, it was our purpose in the end we are just the seed to create this new beeing, far beyond any invented "God" beyond our imagination. this is all exponential, so , very hard to predict. singers will be the first to loose their job in our scene.
OK, ai enthusiasm and stuff is ofcourse great, and in no way am i against a progress, but this shit just won't gonna happen with anything, EVER, except maybe the generic copyright free youtube/company background music, which is trash to begin with, lmao
@@BFHPET I dont think people will be interested in hearing robot music but who knows, the stuff on the charts is already pretty dehumanized. simple acoustic stuff might make a comeback. Songs like drivers license being big is hope aha
Am I the only one who loves creating “new” music to only feel deflated when I realise that it’s all down to the DAW, VST’s and a trillion audio loops. I miss the days of recording on my 4 track Portastudio with my guitar, drum machine and mono synth. The bounce down without hiss and hum was my dopamine hit in those days.
I actually did not fall for the AI or human melodies, they all were really bad so only beginners would have written such bad melodies. You should have chose a better AI that actually writes decent melodies.
I wonder If computers are going to do everything for us humans what we humans are going to do then?? . I think we're going to live in matrix .matrix is the future
Why do they call it AI? These are just human-created algorithms. There's no self-awareness or that it's alive by any means and the resulting work is only as good as the algorithms, which have to be perpetually tweaked by humans in order to maintain any relevance.
The humans may create the outer context of the learning, the model, and adjust "hyper-parameters" for the learning process, but the result of the learning itself (e.g. the weights in a neural network) are not created/specified by humans. Of course, intelligence is a relative and contextual term. Machine learning models are already very intelligent in many tasks compared to programs humans can create naively. Additionally, it is already possible to use ML to automate the design and training of ML models; look up "automated machine learning." As this kind of self-iterative capability improves, maybe we will see a big acceleration in AI general intelligence.
@@tme5 Still, even the algorithms created to do all of this has to be made by a human. Something that can win at Go, doesn't have an algorithm to suddenly start talking and understanding the human language, nor eyesight. Each would need its own algorithm and then there would need to be algorithms within them. In a few years, a human will just come up with a better algorithm for Go and the old one will be "obsolete". People really need to give up on this fantasy of "AI". People these days spend a lot of time putting a lot of fantasy in their science to make it sound cool I guess.
@@DafterHindi The people that can cure tinnitus will be the ones most revered. Brain learning itself has no value. Even a fresh brain can't figure out how to win at Chess or Go, it takes years. That's where algorithms come into play.
@@shitmandood Yes, but I'm saying that it's not certain that humans will always be the ones setting up the ML "algorithms". AIs can already do things better than many classical human-made solutions. Why should machine learning itself be immune to this? Is there a reason that in the future we couldn't create models that are capable of general learning, and improving their own processes, without our help? That can learn how to learn novel tasks that they weren't originally trained for? I don't think it's that fantastical at all
When AI and Humans work together, they are more creative.
well for those who have had the poke there brain is going to be control via a.i in the future
Multiplier: *makes a video about how AI will take our roll as musicians and scare us*
Also Multiplier: *Tries to sell us a music producing AI*
I just saw him in a Unison Midi Chord pack video promoting it… dude has strayed far from where he started. Still got ❤ though
To be honest the best music melodys I make are randomly made and most of the time no real thought is put into it other then just feeling or hearing in My head what might fit next, mostly governed by what sound flow together. I dont really see AI doing much else differently in My opinion.
Yup. I usually sing something in my head or smash my hand on my tiny 2 octave midi keyboard and baam, new ideas.
@@deadlyrobot5179 Ha yes I do that sometimes to Just random playing and out comes a great melody or sound out of nowhere that can then be used as a loop or added to. I find that when I remember those special bits and can replay them any time.
I am similar. I usually call these those "creative decisions" you make that make your tracks sound like, well, YOU! I mean sometimes i do attempt melodies and such with thoughts but i typically feel the creative decision and choice is far more important when putting the whole thing together. If that didnt make sense I apologize, i shouldn't comment on videos as soon as i get off work oof
@@rux_ton nah it makes sense.
@@rux_ton A big part of making music for Me is having no real plan most of the time and if there is one then be willing to change depending on the sounds development. Resampling My own music or making brand new samples opened up a whole new level of music making.
That Eminem AI song is one of the most cursed things I have ever heard.
No need to worry. It is just a sound of future
i'm looking forward to crossing wires between the different senses
"bass drop in the style of hr gieger"
"watercolor painting of coton eyed joe in the style of orbital unreal engine no logo"
Tripped me out w this one
Enjoying the recent content, its really informative
loved this video, AI is such an interesting concept
Incredible stuff! I love love love this personally. I make music myself, but it's inevitable that tech is one of the only reasons I've ever been able to record anything that sounds radio-ready. I favor artistic statements when I sit down and actively listen (which is most times) but also do not shame or shun the other more dominant pattern. A few people recently even said "I really like your music, it doesn't distract me in the background" which was off-putting initially, but I find it now to be a compliment haha.
This was the most interesting video I’ve ever watched. Amazing work
as an artist and aesthete this makes sad. i know big companies will strike rich but art will lose its essence and porpuse. primarly is an outlet and a way of expression for artists like me and a way to communite real-time events and feelings. what a sad times we're living in. hand me a tissue :,(
Fascinating video. Great job!
Classic Multiplier!
Awesome content as always
The Eminem part had me properly chuckling ahaha, nice vid.
How about they make AI do something "Useful" like organize our 100Terabyte sample libraries?
Almost everyone who is not connected to the AI field underestimates it. You haven't done that here. This is excellent. Well done.
definitely agree that for everyone the perfect music is a combination of past feelings and heard music. therefore the individually created music will be quite outperform any mass music. similarly the successful musicians are made by listening and refining tune algorithm in their heads during a long time until once a hit comes out.
Wowzers.. and indeed trousers
Please more of these vids
Man this is so scary and interesting at the same time
I literally said "gross" at the same time, maybe we're the A.I. haha
The Eminem track sounded like the recording from hell in Event Horizon
As far as "when" it is probably happening right now but I doubt we will experience any of this dystopian ideas in our lives, if anything we might experience the beginning. Thing is that while technology advances exponentially nowadays, we can still pretty much tell the difference between something "artificial" and something that was made by humans
ahh, another exestential crisis with multiplier
I actually guess it right as the were all pretty terrible and so well I guessed right somehow and got all four?
exactly
Rainbow hair yes
where is John connor when you need him?
Great video man. I work in AI research with audio, and I’m to see you being so open to it and making a video on it!
You are ruining the world
@@skiddzie9291back from the future.. music it’s already ruined by AI 😢
Guess it's a matter of beeing a creator or a consumer. If music is good in any way and satisfies the consumers needs, then okay. But will all creators stop making music because AI is creating, too? If so, then okay, forget about them.
Circle of Fifth -> Loop -> done ... no need AI to produce po(o)p songs :D
i actually tought myself that all the 4 first songs were written by an AI, the melodies and rythms just make no sense in human perspective
I see by your outfit that you are a cowboy" tell that THIS will ever be better written by a computer or performed than it was by roberto begnini in night on earth ;D and i strongly recommend to think about clsoely WHY there is an urge of humans to have a listen to music that is generated by computers rather than humans. my answer is simple: jsut to make more profit out of it. thats why they will bake your bread, write your music or perform it, cook your food, build your home etc etc...the question left out is just: what will happen to all the obsolete workers then?
Let me make it simple for you guys, our only reason for existence is to evolve into ones and zeros.
Don't resist, accept your fate.
first two chords of Lady Gaga: Dope
ai will do everything, max 5 years, we are done, it was our purpose in the end we are just the seed to create this new beeing, far beyond any invented "God" beyond our imagination.
this is all exponential, so , very hard to predict.
singers will be the first to loose their job in our scene.
Don’t you think it will be producers before singers
OK, ai enthusiasm and stuff is ofcourse great, and in no way am i against a progress, but this shit just won't gonna happen with anything, EVER, except maybe the generic copyright free youtube/company background music, which is trash to begin with, lmao
not gonna happen musicians will fight back
at the end of the day its not yourself creating it there is no art in doing ai music
@@BFHPET yeah but AI could take over our jobs maybe?
@@rainbowmachine25 yes im afraid too its very sad
@@BFHPET I dont think people will be interested in hearing robot music but who knows, the stuff on the charts is already pretty dehumanized. simple acoustic stuff might make a comeback. Songs like drivers license being big is hope aha
@@rainbowmachine25 i heard a ai made jimi hendrix one of hes lost songs it sounded nice actually
all 4 examples in the beginning sounded like AI to me tbh.
Am I the only one who loves creating “new” music to only feel deflated when I realise that it’s all down to the DAW, VST’s and a trillion audio loops. I miss the days of recording on my 4 track Portastudio with my guitar, drum machine and mono synth. The bounce down without hiss and hum was my dopamine hit in those days.
Ten years. In ten years (maybe less) AI will write much better music than all humans.
everything is better in the simulation!
The answer is 2 years lol
well if you had the poke your going to be controlled by a.i in the future
I actually did not fall for the AI or human melodies, they all were really bad so only beginners would have written such bad melodies. You should have chose a better AI that actually writes decent melodies.
I wonder If computers are going to do everything for us humans what we humans are going to do then?? . I think we're going to live in matrix .matrix is the future
everyone will be too busy arguing online and getting offended at things that don’t matter, because no one will have anything better to do
@@chiefqueef facts...
Library music composers are out of a job in the next 5-10 years then...
Maybe, AI might plagiarize less than humans. Just a thought...🤔🙂
I’m scared.
do you ever think you are restarted and you have no concept of one good song
Why does it sound like you're trying to talk quietly. So annoying just talk
This is creepy
Why do they call it AI? These are just human-created algorithms. There's no self-awareness or that it's alive by any means and the resulting work is only as good as the algorithms, which have to be perpetually tweaked by humans in order to maintain any relevance.
The humans may create the outer context of the learning, the model, and adjust "hyper-parameters" for the learning process, but the result of the learning itself (e.g. the weights in a neural network) are not created/specified by humans. Of course, intelligence is a relative and contextual term. Machine learning models are already very intelligent in many tasks compared to programs humans can create naively. Additionally, it is already possible to use ML to automate the design and training of ML models; look up "automated machine learning." As this kind of self-iterative capability improves, maybe we will see a big acceleration in AI general intelligence.
its like we create the brain, the brain learns itself
@@tme5 Still, even the algorithms created to do all of this has to be made by a human. Something that can win at Go, doesn't have an algorithm to suddenly start talking and understanding the human language, nor eyesight. Each would need its own algorithm and then there would need to be algorithms within them. In a few years, a human will just come up with a better algorithm for Go and the old one will be "obsolete".
People really need to give up on this fantasy of "AI". People these days spend a lot of time putting a lot of fantasy in their science to make it sound cool I guess.
@@DafterHindi The people that can cure tinnitus will be the ones most revered. Brain learning itself has no value. Even a fresh brain can't figure out how to win at Chess or Go, it takes years. That's where algorithms come into play.
@@shitmandood Yes, but I'm saying that it's not certain that humans will always be the ones setting up the ML "algorithms". AIs can already do things better than many classical human-made solutions. Why should machine learning itself be immune to this? Is there a reason that in the future we couldn't create models that are capable of general learning, and improving their own processes, without our help? That can learn how to learn novel tasks that they weren't originally trained for? I don't think it's that fantastical at all