Derivation of the mirror equation | Geometric optics | Physics | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacadem...
    In this video David derives the mirror equation and magnification equation. Created by David SantoPietro.
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
    Physics on Khan Academy: Physics is the study of the basic principles that govern the physical world around us. We'll start by looking at motion itself. Then, we'll learn about forces, momentum, energy, and other concepts in lots of different physical situations. To get the most out of physics, you'll need a solid understanding of algebra and a basic understanding of trigonometry.
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Physics channel: / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...

Комментарии • 24

  • @romarssieverything9667
    @romarssieverything9667 6 лет назад +17

    Wow .my teacher couldn't make me understand this in 150 minutes.And u did it in about 14 minutes.Thnx a lot.I would be glad now if this derivation comes in the exam.

  • @princevegeta5907
    @princevegeta5907 5 лет назад +4

    At 8:57, this doesn't make a complete triangle and there is little uncertainty i.e image height near the tangent is slightly longer than the actual image height.
    Then, won't the mirror equation give approximate answers rather than actual values?

    • @yashuppot3214
      @yashuppot3214 3 года назад

      Yes the equation itself is an approximation

  • @matthewjames8127
    @matthewjames8127 7 лет назад +3

    This is a neat approach instead of proving the mirror equation with Euclid's exterior angle theorem and small angle approximations.

  • @silviamayo2993
    @silviamayo2993 6 лет назад +3

    It's so satisfying that he uses that tool to draw straight lines.

  • @rupjyotidas3091
    @rupjyotidas3091 7 лет назад +3

    But my book shows that the object distance will always be negative if it is in front of the concavemirror and will always be positive if it is behind the convex mirror

    • @shabarish2727
      @shabarish2727 6 лет назад

      take any direction you want
      just all other directions should be taken in the same convention.
      Object distance negative then so be it , just adjust others

    • @zafferabassnaik
      @zafferabassnaik 6 лет назад +1

      It is for convex mirror.

    • @scotttallec584
      @scotttallec584 6 лет назад

      No always negative in my class, You just have to indicate eventually what frame of reference you're using on a diagram. I believe Khan even stated that algebraically we have left to right is positive and down to up is positive.

    • @resendylldcruz1137
      @resendylldcruz1137 5 лет назад

      Guys do we have to make it with measurements or without measurements

  • @lucasfreire1090
    @lucasfreire1090 4 года назад

    I didn't find this video to be accurate, because the object height is being measured from the vertex of the mirror and not from the point where the yellow ray of light is reflecting

  • @Fidonese
    @Fidonese 6 лет назад +1

    This video was an absolute lifesaver... Thank you so much.

  • @chie8466
    @chie8466 8 месяцев назад

    Thanks! ❤❤

  • @ASHOKKUMAR-cx4ey
    @ASHOKKUMAR-cx4ey 4 года назад

    In indian textbooks the direction convention is just opposite . We consider object distance negative

  • @juankim9581
    @juankim9581 7 лет назад

    Love your videos!!!
    They're absolute quality

  • @RyanLynch1
    @RyanLynch1 6 лет назад

    or angle angle angle triangle similarity

  • @lemonpooh1764
    @lemonpooh1764 7 лет назад

    thank you soooooo much

  • @seamusfing
    @seamusfing 5 лет назад

    i love you

  • @BBTAatharshV
    @BBTAatharshV 7 лет назад

    A good one ...🤞🏻✌🏻

  • @goamhobala
    @goamhobala 3 года назад

    Dioooooooooooo

  • @AldeyWP
    @AldeyWP 7 лет назад

    Beautiful!

  • @caputlp1340
    @caputlp1340 8 лет назад +1

    Isn't there something wrong with the last triangle? I meen how can you assume it is a right triangle? Is it just an approximation?
    By the way great video 👌

  • @karmapolice3335
    @karmapolice3335 7 лет назад +1

    ah man you complicated this so much...