The James Webb Telescope Has Discovered a Primordial Galaxy That Is as Old as the Universe!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- There's definitely no turning back now! The James Webb telescope has found a primordial galaxy as old as the universe! This discovery heralds the definitive end of the old astrophysics and cosmology. We are at the beginning of a completely new natural science that will change the foundations of our physics forever. If the new figures are correct, this galaxy is far older than the universe and this means that our previous understanding of space and time must be completely reconsidered. But are we really ready to rewrite the history of the cosmos and expand the boundaries of our knowledge?
Science is a journey not an end.
Light takes so long to reach us that all that JW sees maybe gone? There maybe nothing there? Is that possible?
it could be, yes.
I think there's a problem. We look at this old galaxy and say that because of distance and time it is older than the universe. However the race of beings on a planet in that old galaxy has a telescope pointed at the milky way galaxy and they're pulling out their hair screaming that the milky way galaxy is older than the universe! There is a reflexive problem due to the fact that any and every point in the universe is technically the exact center of itself.
That galaxy no longer exists. We're seeing its radiation/light. Due to it being formed long before our own Milky Way, there's a low probability that an alien race from that far back is observing us.
The JADES team has found the new farthest galaxy humans have ever seen: JADES-GS-z14-0. This source, which is found at a redshift of 14.32, is so distant we're seeing it as the Universe was when it was only **290 million years old.**
Lost me at 4:03. When he said 270 million light years after the big bang.
Light year is a measure of distance not time. I mean that's fundamental high School level cosmology.
Sometimes I question all human knowledge I don't think anyone really knows about the nature of the universe
Yes light year is the measurements of the distance but not only that it's the measurement of the distance and how long it takes to get there in years so we know how fast light goes it's three hundred thirty thousand something km per second. A dizzying speed to say the least. Then someone not sure who decided the way we measure it but it's also the time it takes to get there. So one light year would be correct me if I am completely and utterly wrong but it would be the speed of light ×60 seconds x60 mins x24h x365days? Then you would know how long it would take if we think of it like let's say point A and point B to if it took 1 light year to start at point A to get to Point B you are measuring the time and distance I'm a little confused after explaining it myself I'm not trying to say you're wrong I have always thought it was both please tell me if I'm just as dumb as every other human that thought it this way too... The universe is a perplexingly confusing wonder. I'm intrigued by it everyday and only could dream/wish that humans were so far more advanced than we are. I honestly wish I were born 400-4k years from now could you imagine the in adventure into the vast space the celestial wonders our race may or may not see.
When they originally stated universe was 12 to 13 billion years old I thought impossible given earth is a few billion years old
“Oh we can’t be wrong”.
There is no beginning. Everything was always is. Just like the universe. Infinite. We are the beginning to our own end.
We don't know how old the universe is 😂
It’s roughly a consensus but stu185 knows it better 🙏
Well I think I do, The hypothesis that I have supported for many years is that the big bang never happened (see Dr Eric Lerner) the big bang is only based on the assumption that the red shit is due to an expanding universe, all but one of the predictions of BB theory is proved wrong and now the results from the JWST have added more.
Firstly I think the Big Bang never happened, the universe is not expanding, the universe is infinite, the universe never had a beginning and will never have an end. So I think that answers your question also the results from the JWST are exactly what I was expecting.
Steady State!
Agreed!
The age of the galaxy can not be fixed at a given point in time. What scientist speculate is based upon current knowledge and observations. The age of the galaxy has changed as more and better observations have improved over time.
A lot has to be reconsidered and re-formulated in physics / astrophysics. For example, with simple logic & math I here below show that relativity theory is based on an incorrect basic assumption (the Clock hypothesis).
Einstein was undoubtedly a very creative person, with groundbreaking ideas/statements about reality. But he also made mistakes, the most well known is perhaps believing in a static universe, until he changed his mind 1931, long after the General theory of relativity was produced (1915). Another fairly well known mistake by Einstein, was to reject the existence of black holes. He did that in a published paper 1939. Slightly remarkable concerning this is that Karl Schwarzschild (clearly also an astrophysics genious) mathematically showed (1916) that black holes should exist, using Einsteins own basic equation system in General relativity! From Schwarzschild's equation (called the Schwarzschild metric) the gravitational time dilation equation, used since then, could be derived.
In the Special Theory of relativity (1905) there unfortunately seems to be a profound mistake (a thought error concerning the physical interpretation of certain equations), which actually can be proven without much mathematical acrobatics after understanding the conceptual aspect of it. I do that below. I think a big problem at that time for scientists was the lack of knowledge of the atom structure, and how physical time basically is relative rates of change in such structures. Physical time emanates from matter, not from a dimension in space.
1. When reasoning about clocks and time, one should use atomic clocks. Because physical time emanates from rate of change of the parts (electrons, quarks) atoms are made up of. Mechanical acceleration (not free fall with gravitational acceleration) cause time dilation, slowed rate of change in atoms. Einsteins equivalence principle is correct *, but not completely correctly interpreted physically by the mainstream science community imo.
* The rate of change in atoms in an object positioned fixed in a gravitational field (it is then mechanically accelerated upwards), is the same as the rate of change in atoms in an object similarly mechanically accelerated in a non-gravitational environment (and while accelerated, moving in an absolute sense).
2. It is a mathematical fact in the Lorentz factor, used in the Special Relativity (SR) time dilation equation, that the squared velocity variable there is equal to: 2 • acceleration • distance. Which is an equation originally derived by Torricelli (v squared = 2 • acceleration • distance, assuming initial velocity = 0), later incorporated among Newtons equations of motion. What that means is that the SR time dilation equation is not valid (can not be used) for calculating time dilation for time intervals where acceleration does not take place. Which means that the so called Clock hypothesis is false, which assumes that acceleration as such has no effect on time dilation. Instead, it is ONLY accelerated motion (but not gravitational acceleration with free fall) which creates physical time dilation.
In summary:
- Equations in Special relativity, containing the v^2 variable can not be used for inertial (non-accelerated) motions, they are only mathematically valid for accelerated motions. This seems to be a very common mistake by many physicists in calculation examples.
- The twin "paradox" can then be fully explained/understood, intuitively, logically, mathematically and physically. Physical processes in atoms slow down when a rocket is accelerated. Only one twin is accelerated and it does not matter how far he/she travels back and forth with a non-accelerated coasting motion, the physical time dilation will be the same. The so called distance proof, that velocity as such, in inertial or non-inertial motion, is the source of time dilation is false. It is an invalid use (interpretation) of the time dilation equation, which produces different time dilations for different travelled total distances for the travelling twin.
- The Minkowski spacetime concept is based on the Clock hypothesis (which means continuous time dilation while an object is moving trough spacetime with a constant velocity), and therefore becomes false if the Clock hypothesis is false. Einstein was reluctant to accepting the Minkowski spacetime concept when it was presented (1908), and he should have kept that position instead of later accepting it. Space and time are two completely different entities, and there is no such physical connection between them as the spacetime concept wants to create.
- If muons are time dilated (live longer in average before disintegrating) when decelerated in the atmosphere moving towards the ground of the earth, they can not be fundamental particles. They must in reality be constructed with parts which can change their rate of change when accelerated (decelerated), to fit with the pure mathematical reasoning in point 2 above.
First, doesn't it bother anyone else that they are using the term light years as a unit of time instead of distance? Second, if we are seeing something from that close to the origin of the universe, doesn't it follow that our current models wouldn't hold there since conditions literally HAD to be significantly different? The amount of pressure being exerted on all matter to form celestial bodies has to be orders of magnitude greater than anything that we here have ever experienced. E=MCsquared, right? Since matter can never be created or destroyed, only transformed, taking the current mass of the universe, calĝculate it and "run it backwards". It must have been compressed into a significantly smaller area. By the time we can even see it, it could no longer exist
Big Bang goes bust!
We need to start designing an even better JWST and get it launched in the next 10 years. There are so many things yet to be discovered.
“Wah, it’s GOTTA have BIG BANG or we lose our funding!”
A lot of churches are gonna see some kind of boom at least 😂
@@deathbydeviceable Physics is Kabalah. The big bang is a j3wish theory which is gatekept at the highest level.
The 13.8 billion years for the age of the universe was just someone's wild guess. We now know from the evidence that it is wrong.
First😊 nice video!!!
Kaleidscope science awaits us.
We cannot measure the gap between the past and the future, a gap we are always in so we stand no chance of measuring how old or new the universe is.
We are living in a simulation inside of a simulation!!😂
🌌
Galaxies are loosely collected gas with burning plasma balls of it, at what point do we see just a galaxy sized star? Also, what if dark stars are just a blackhole devouring a massive star. A blackhole would not simply envelop it, as the material a black hole can absorb is proportional to its size.
Welcome Cloud and rain model universe.. 🙏🙏
I can't stop thinking about this stuff. Puts all our bs in perspective
Trust me. There was and is something before the big bang: the trigger puller!
We don't even even know how galaxies are formed, so how can we know long it takes to form a mature galaxy? Then by extension, how can we know a galaxy predates the Big Bang? Could somehow galaxies be formed right at the Big Bang ? OR could we be wrong about the age of the universe?
Final question..Is all this the truth. Or, Hypothetical?
It´s simply true what they tell in this video and there is even more...
We LOST a lot of time for the research of an unexisting idea... the big bang!
At 6:08 you said “Apox” what is Apox?
Webb proving B.B. is bull shit.
Exactly.
Does the Webb Telescope measure the Nuclear and radiological events in Space?
Did the Webb Telescope measure RADIATION ACTIVITY in the Plasma?
I think the universe is 77 Trillion years old
Truly astonishing
Ive Heard that The Big Bang was around 6 billion years ago. So. How has that length of time affected our temperature? Global warming, or!?????
Earth is 6 billion, big bang was supposedly over 13 billion old, climate change has been happening forever.
Out with the old "truth." In with the new! Humility is as far from these people as HD1 is from the Earth.
Eh, ? It's always been about trying to see whether the truth stands up. It was scientists and " these people" who are revealing all these new discoveries. It is scientists who are saying we have discovered sonething new.
How do we know it's a galaxy and not a primordial black hole or something else
Are those 3 the real reason why there’s 3 pyramids
Thing is the Universe we observe today is the equivalence of a fruit fly looking at the goings on in the whole of the kitchen. In multiverse time we have the lifespan of a fruit fly’s stomach microbiome.
5.23mins. You say that the James Webb telescope has just confirmed that STARS ARE POWERED BY DARK MATTER. The Sun is our nearest star. The James Webb cannot look at it because it uses infra red technology. Can you prove that the Sun is powered by 'dark matter'?
Our knowledge is very limited, the more we think we know the more we see new knowledge
Or. Is it possible that SPACE TALK is in fact, Mainly Theoretical,.? Isn't it almost Impossible to say. ITS ALL FACTUAL? Im a mere human. Not in university at any time.
Maybe you should start with something simpler and then work your way up. No shame in that.
@@ron88303 It is largely theoretical, though.
Dark matter 😅. Something we haven’t found but using it to make our theories to work
Dark stars, made out of Dark matter !!! and don't forget Dark energy...
Is the Webb Telescope AERONAUTICALLY capable of travelling at 720 miles per hour without falling apart? Has this been proven?
Ummm..... it's in space, there is no atmosphere.
Heat striking resistance creates sparks of heat exchanging energy through all masses in its path as renewable energy exchanging singularities point to point chain reactions through mass lighting up surrounding atmospheres exchanging singularities point to point. Striking mass sparks electrons of light. Heat transference through mass lights up as sparks. There are no electrons of negative force. Heat is a force of pressure outward. Heat has to ground for mass to exist as internal magnetic fields grounding currents into surrounding areas of mass. Mass occupies cold space itself as neutralized cold space repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion within mass. Internal magnetic fields grounding currents like earth's internal magnetic field through the nucleus or core where external energy flow is stronger at the center of unification of unidirectional flow cycling circulation patterns as mass. Hydrogen has the strongest internal magnetic field of force of pressure with minimal distance traveling, cycling circulation patterns as mass, and the strongest force of pressure. As mass expands outward as space within and occupies more space, its internal magnetic field weakens in force of pressure and increases in distance traveling equalization to force of pressure known as weightless outward pressure outside of a greater greater internal magnetic field. A greater internal magnetic field redirects heat grounding currents towards the greater magnetic field flow towards the greater center of force flow currents grounding themselves into internal magnetic fields surrounding mass. Mass is always the weakest point of repulsion as outward force of pressure within as neutralized force of pressure grounding currents into itself and surrounding mass as the weakest point of repulsion. External magnetic fields don't ground heat energy. Space is a weak external magnetic field filled with dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy. Dark energy traveling through normal open space is at maximum distance traveling and the least force of pressure to and from repulsion of cold space. Mass is always equal to force of pressure and distance traveling cycling circulation patterns as mass. Repulsion to mass is always equal within and without entanglement. Distance traveling decreases, and the force of pressure increases as internal magnetic fields grounding currents into itself as mass occupies space. Liquidity infinity to illusionary solidity of mass as renewable energy cycling circulation patterns as internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core as liquidity infinity. Liquidity external and internal heat energy. Heat energy is constant normal space flow cycling circulation patterns within and without entanglement of mass as liquidity infinity flow external heat energy within and without entanglement of mass. The exception of the speed limit of flow potentially is external magnetic fields of flow around these monopoles spheres of absolute zero heat energy within as pure repulsion of cold space to heat propulsion around the perimeter of these spheres monopoles of pure repulsion. Normal space is filled with dark external heat energy waves throughout space as space itself. Cold and heat coexist but don't have contact. The force of pressure is maintained as equalization to anti-matter. Matter is created by unification of the unidirectional flow of heat energy back onto itself as grounding currents of unification of unidirectional flow cycling heat back onto itself as mass creating internal magnetic fields grounding currents through the nucleus or core where external heat energy waves cycling circulation patterns as illusionary solidity of liquidity infinity as mass. The weakest point of repulsion is mass as neutralized repulsion within mass as outward force of pressure known as weightless outside of a greater magnetic field. Magnetism is the force of pressure backing up into itself as internal magnetic fields grounding currents into equalization of force of pressure and distance traveling cycling circulation patterns of mass entanglement. Distance is always equal to the force of pressure constant cosmic speed limit in repulsion as normal space. Black holes are spheres of pure cold repulsion of normal space filled with dark heat energy outside and within entanglement. External magnetic fields disrupt normal space repulsion to internal magnetic fields grounding, and internal magnetic fields in proximity are outward force of pressure and when normal repulsion of space is disrupted by external magnetic fields normal space filled with dark heat energy is repelled towards the weakest point of repulsion as occupational space towards the greater external magnetic field force of flow. Internal magnetic fields grounding currents in proximity lose renewable energy, exchanging singularities and outward force of pressure disolves internal grounding currents towards the greater external magnetic field flow. Mass disolves its internal magnetic fields to external heat energy. Magnetism circulation patterns disolves into external flow. Magnetic fields influence each other as synchronization.
All PhDs, read Genesis 1: 1, that settles it.
James Webb say it could look at different galaxy but it can't find planet X 😂🤣😂
Too many peoples egos get in the way.
I have never seen so much ignorance concentrated in such a small space.
The flat earthers on RUclips say that all this is computer generated!
flat earth is silly, BUT flat universe...
@@AltMarc You may have something there! …but the flat earthers wouldn’t go for it! They say the universe is painted on the dome!
In the beginning God created the HEAVENS and the EARTH . The truth will set up free .
Never thought I'd be a fan of somebody with that much of an age gap with me but after some research this young cat has some gray matter horsepower 8 ways to Sunday. (How much of a geek am I when I'm a fan of an Astrophysicist? lol)
Scientists can't stand having to say when they are wrong so like a five year old boy who lost a game he says that the winner cheated only in this case they are saying that the universe is cheating because they keep on being proven to be wrong.
Oh. And Which came first. GOD, or something else???
People are here for scientific theories.Take your religious bullshit somehere else.
@@mrrahbieh please don't be rude to people who you don't know.
@@mrrahbieh Big Bang is from the Kabalah, a jewish text.
Very silly presentation!😂
I'm sorry. Just can't listen to this 'voice'.
we don't know jack shit.....
Blah, blah, blah, bullshit.
First of all we have no ideal what the universe is or how old by our ideal of time and light can not tell you how old something is there may be nothing there by now if it takes light millions of light years to reach us comical
❤❤❤
In my view, the human capacity for understanding the origins of the universe is limited. I believe the universe is boundless, extending infinitely in every direction. It transcends the concept of a beginning and an end, existing in a perpetual state of existence.
I agree with this concept as well. Thanks
I also agree with your thinking. If there is potentially no end to the universe, why should there be a beginning? The universe always was, and always will be. The concept of every super massive black hole being the gateway to another universe makes as much sense as anything in my opinion. If the "Big Bang" is actually the center point of a black hole that is emitting matter from a contracting universe on the other side...that would explain so many things.
The big bang was just our bang. Those are other bangs. Space is vast indeed
This is a simulation there is no ‘big bang’. It was just someone pressing /run. It’s how you get something from nothing.
Yes. why is it so hard to imagine a multiverse or even multiverses? Why can't we imagine two universes merging together just like galaxies do? Why can't the Big Bang be an explosion of a star like body colossal size inside a universe of colossal unfathomable size?
Taking a page from brane theory, if two adjacent brakes were to make contact, could not the resulting energy generated at the point of contact be enough to spark the creation of our universe? And if this were the case, could not another universe be created in the same way, in the other brane? So if one could look all the way back to that point of contact, (big bang for lack of a better term) could it be possible to see through it into the other universe? Would that be mathematically possible? Could the “big bang” be two branes “banging” into each other. Instead of just a random pop for no reason?
PS - BRANES NOT BRAKES! I really hate spellcheckers.
Light is only present in resistance to mass. Heat waves magnifying light throughout space and atmospheres as friction of heat sparks lighting up atmospheres like filaments. Stars decay their atmospheres as sparks lighting up and heat waves are outward force of pressure. Collisions of heat waves resonating throughout space as dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable energy when entanglement with mass. Mass is internal magnetic fields grounding heat currents incoming and outgoing heat energy singularities exchanging points in chain reactions through all mass in its path as renewable heat energy when entanglement with mass occurs again. From stars to planets as heat waves of decay from stars as renewable energy to existing mass occurs. Friction causes sparks of striking singularities in exchanging singularities point to point chain reactions through all masses in its path until resistance is overcome by open space itself and returns to dark heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable energy when entanglement with mass occurs again. Engines ground heat energy to anti freeze and radiators ground energy into atmospheres and atmospheres grounding heat currents as surface mass towards earth's internal magnetic field as force of pressure known as weight. Cold resistance within mass as repulsion to heat as outward force of pressure outside of a greater internal magnetic field as weightless. Inside a greater internal magnetic field redirects renewable energy outgoing heat energy singularities towards the greater magnetic field of force flow currents grounding themselves through all masses in its path as force of pressure known as weight. Force of pressure within mass is always equal to cold repulsion within and without mass in equalization to force of pressure and distance traveling equalization. Mass falls in equalization to repulsion within and without entanglement of mass. Hydrogen has the strongest internal magnetic field of force flow currents grounding and the least distance traveling cycling circulation patterns. As mass expands its internal magnetic field weakens as force of pressure decreases and distance traveling increases. More repulsion within and without in equalization to expansion. Equalization of falling through atmospheres. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Mass is external heat energy cycling circulation patterns in internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core where force is stronger. Physics works. Heat is outward force of pressure within all mass and and can't physically collapse in on itself. Outward pressure is stronger than repulsion because heat can accumulate and space itself doesn't. Space is cold repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion. Space is filled with dark heat energy throughout space as a weak external magnetic field that repels heat singularities outside of entanglement of mass. Spheres are circular from equalization to cold repulsion of space. Galaxies form like pancakes from equalization of repulsion as force of pressure from external magnetic fields at their central cores or nucleus of pure cold space repulsion to heat propulsion. Black holes are void cold space itself of absolute zero heat energy within. Monopoles of cold repulsion to heat propulsion. Anti matter is cold and heat coexist but don't mix. That's why we have force of pressure. You can't squeeze them together. Repulsion to heat propulsion from cold repulsion as momentum of perpetual motion. Unification of unidirectional flow of heat waves as backflows onto itself as internal magnetic fields. Magnets show internal magnetic fields grounding currents into itself through its core or nucleus. Galaxies surrounding external magnetic fields that don't ground heat energy. External magnetic fields are outside the nucleus or core where internal magnetic fields grounding currents through the nucleus or core. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity.
Jesus I read your previous lengthy comment prior to this comment.... I'd be so intrigued and fascinated if I were able to pic your brain 🧠 someday. I may have had to re-read some points in your comments but indeed understood the physics of it all... Almost like an animated display/diagram in my subconscious while Reading throughout the paragraphs. I'm beyond perplexed each and everyday about however the universe has come to be... We I believe as a species are in the here and now of the universe are so far behind... We should've so far surpassed what we are physically and technologically able to do today
I'm 50 years old and have always said the Big Bang Theory doesn't add up. How can the entire mass of the universe magically appear from one point in time. What was there before it? Where did all the materials to create an entire universe come from? What would have brought it to one single point? It's absurd.
Big Bang is not entirely wrong, rather it is incomplete.... it is a minuscule and localized (relatively) event in a humanly unfathomable vastness and time scale.
What came first chicken or the egg answer that and that’s your answer
The whole universe is absurd! What is its purpose? WHAT IS the Universe, in the end? The Universe "IS", but it could also "NOT BE"...
The fact that there is anything shows that something can be made from nothing.
@@bennysr5220 Answer = Egg because Dinosaur.
Question = What came first Dinosaur or the Egg?
Answer = Dinosaur because Bacteria.
It ain't that tricky really :D
"300 or possibly 270 light years after The Big Bang".
How many parsecs did it take to reach that conclusion?
less than 12.
It existed 270 million light years before the Big Bang?
Shoddy writing!
Nobody knows how old anything pertaining to the universe is, or if there was an actual "Big Bang".
James Webb has the ability to look very far into space, and therefore, very far into the past. Indeed, although light travels at the dizzying speed of 300,000 kilometers per second, the Universe is so vast that some images that reach us today are billions of years old!
So I have always been perplexed by this exact fact. Though what confuses me every day is what is happening in the here and now? At this point in time in the universe?? Does that mean we are not able to see what's happening in this very moment...? I guess my main question is ; (I know that the images are that of millions of not billions years old) so technically speaking does that mean that in theory that the images we receive from JWST are images of possible celestial wonders that may be and most likely vastly different than what exists in this exact moment of time in the universe? Isn't that a bit of a problem??? Not being able to forsee calamities or possibly extinction level catastrophic events????
I think we need to go back to r² and the three dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law! Spherical 4πr² geometry is fundamental to this process and this is based on Huygens’ Principle of 1670 that says,
“Every point on a light wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² light wave".
We can think of each point as a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction or vibration. The spherical surface forms a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty of this everyday life.
Light speeds up and then slows down and stops, this means you're timing is not correct
BB is misleading word .It is a rapid expansion of Universe
Come one people of eurth it is actual thentional translations and warbling directional shifting of the aditudes of translations
Not primordial at oll💜
Here you are bend over this sharing mabey than tace the time to see oll sharings and youl understand
Thentional translations on eurth and sun do to kuiper aditude tace most of the times less than 2 seconds and directly along wards 2 and indirectly at most 7 seconds🌹from the sun back
Inerhelio everighe thention disides how long in helio bounce we saw 4 seconds🌱
In galactic and ultycost scale less chosional diamagneticle resistance we see faster speeds
Just look to Daley events worldwide and space Wethersfield and youl see it right afrond of your own eyes🥳
Could it be that the concept of a multiverse needs to be redefined? The
last grasp of one universe and the first breath of another - an overlap?
When they originally stated universe was 12 to 13 billion years old I thought impossible given earth is a few billion years old
a lot of people dreaming big
And. Is it in fact, possible that Time does in fact have a beginning, and an End?
To us yes but The Almighty was always here
@@StuyJamaicaYonkers Not really so mighty ... or if mighty; then pretty evil.
He’s way ahead of you Ron, he’s evil enough to create you, make that make sense
Amazing video. Keep it up❤
The James Webb telescope supposedly travelled at 720 miles per hour through the PLASMA of space. How do you know that you can travel at 720 miles per hour through PLASMA?
I have always wondered why the Big Bang only exploded in one direction, would it not have blown in all directions? Well