Multicollinearity

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
  • This video explains what the issue of multicollinear regressors causes for estimation, using the example of TV and Radio advertising. Check out ben-lambert.co... for course materials, and information regarding updates on each of the courses. Quite excitingly (for me at least), I am about to publish a whole series of new videos on Bayesian statistics on youtube. See here for information: ben-lambert.co... Accompanying this series, there will be a book: www.amazon.co....

Комментарии • 50

  • @mreighthamburger7485
    @mreighthamburger7485 8 лет назад +48

    oh man you should be my professor you know what watching your videos helps a lot more than my professor's lectures....

  • @_Anonymous_9
    @_Anonymous_9 7 лет назад +17

    Ben is Da Bomb - made it from 1-60 videos so far, actually quite enjoy studying econometrics now xD Cheers Ben!

  • @tunahanuzun603
    @tunahanuzun603 2 месяца назад

    This video is crazily good! Never understood econometrics better, and it's actually making fun to study it! :)

  • @nonah133
    @nonah133 3 года назад +1

    Saving me right now with online classes. Thank you!

  • @AbdulAziz-gt8oo
    @AbdulAziz-gt8oo 4 года назад +2

    Thank you! its so helpful, the explanation is easy to be understand.

    • @TJAcademyofficial
      @TJAcademyofficial 4 года назад

      For more helpful videos on the subject, Subscribe TJ Academy
      ruclips.net/channel/UCQ7Cbm57341QKdgZ_fTDGvw
      For Multicollinearity
      English (with EViews): ruclips.net/video/HoT78GCZExo/видео.html
      Urdu/Hindi: ruclips.net/video/KUtA6ZwyhpQ/видео.html (Headphone recommended for this video only)

  • @My_Melody_Forever
    @My_Melody_Forever 6 лет назад +1

    You have genius teaching skill.

  • @pushypin
    @pushypin 10 лет назад +2

    Excellent presentation. I'm watching your videos to better understand the quant section of CFA Level II. Thank you Ben!

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  10 лет назад

      Hi, thanks for your message, and kind words. Best of luck with the CFA! Hope it all goes well. Cheers, Ben

    • @LSchork17
      @LSchork17 Год назад

      9 years later I am doing the same thing. Hope they were helpful for you. Thanks Ben!

  • @danielr3544
    @danielr3544 5 лет назад +1

    Youre Videos are great short but well explained !

    • @TJAcademyofficial
      @TJAcademyofficial 4 года назад

      For more helpful videos on the subject, Subscribe TJ Academy
      ruclips.net/channel/UCQ7Cbm57341QKdgZ_fTDGvw
      For Multicollinearity
      English (with EViews): ruclips.net/video/HoT78GCZExo/видео.html
      Urdu/Hindi: ruclips.net/video/KUtA6ZwyhpQ/видео.html (Headphone recommended for this video only)

  • @dandorsano9982
    @dandorsano9982 7 лет назад +2

    You're awesome Ben! Very helpful videos

    • @TJAcademyofficial
      @TJAcademyofficial 4 года назад +1

      For more helpful videos on the subject, Subscribe TJ Academy
      ruclips.net/channel/UCQ7Cbm57341QKdgZ_fTDGvw
      For Multicollinearity
      English (with EViews): ruclips.net/video/HoT78GCZExo/видео.html
      Urdu/Hindi: ruclips.net/video/KUtA6ZwyhpQ/видео.html (Headphone recommended for this video only)

  • @user-qh4vj7wo8m
    @user-qh4vj7wo8m 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you doctor for the presentation especially exemplification

  • @seanmenzies1986
    @seanmenzies1986 8 лет назад +1

    Very well explained and demonstrated. Many thanks.

  • @spacedustpi
    @spacedustpi 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks for this explanation. So my understanding is that multicollinearity is only worth finding out if you want to know how much each attribute is contributing to the model. Which, if you want to be prudent, you should find out. So how would you find out? Run a regression twice where with one of the attributes held out in the first regression and the other held out in the second regression? Then compare the two results to determine which one has more effect on the sales? Thank you in advance.

  • @samjab9237
    @samjab9237 Год назад

    you're a king mate

  • @shreyaschaturvedi1933
    @shreyaschaturvedi1933 4 года назад +1

    Brilliant, thank you!

    • @TJAcademyofficial
      @TJAcademyofficial 4 года назад

      For more helpful videos on the subject, Subscribe TJ Academy
      ruclips.net/channel/UCQ7Cbm57341QKdgZ_fTDGvw
      For Multicollinearity
      English (with EViews): ruclips.net/video/HoT78GCZExo/видео.html
      Urdu/Hindi: ruclips.net/video/KUtA6ZwyhpQ/видео.html (Headphone recommended for this video only)

  • @moobadaa
    @moobadaa 10 лет назад +1

    Hi Ben. I am trying to watch the videos based on the order in the playlist. But you've not talked about R2 and significance level yet and now are using these concepts!

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  10 лет назад

      Hi, thanks for your suggestion. I realise there are some conflicts here and there. I will add a link to these topics in the video. Best, Ben

  • @adulas2244
    @adulas2244 3 года назад

    Very useful!! Thank you so much

  • @tmuffly1
    @tmuffly1 5 лет назад +2

    Dr. Lambert, I really enjoy your videos. I have two continuous variables: rcs(Age, 5) and rcs(GRE_score, 6) that I relaxed the cubic splines on and now I a getting huge VIF values for each of those variables. Does VIF work with variables that have relaxed cubic splines please? Thank you for your important work.

    • @alteredkill6109
      @alteredkill6109 4 месяца назад

      I think if you try to Reinfeld equation against the null thatll help. Wald's theory of VIF works with variables that have relaxed cubic splines. Remember: your GE number might be low when using the SRI technique on VIF. Good luck!

  • @AceGhostification
    @AceGhostification 10 лет назад +6

    Thanks... I still don't understand..damn i am so weak in this math thingy..

  • @amitrv007
    @amitrv007 5 лет назад +3

    Hi Ben, which software do you use for these illustrations?

  • @willdiaz6465
    @willdiaz6465 3 года назад

    thank you very good

  • @jetiyap.5725
    @jetiyap.5725 9 лет назад +1

    So thank you.

  • @chh376
    @chh376 8 лет назад +3

    Hi, Ben, it's really helpful.
    But I was wondering if we need to check the multicollinearity for variables like dummies and time trend. Because I suppose for example dummies for structural break should be highly correlated to some variables and that is the point of using them, right? and same for time effect.

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  8 лет назад +7

      +CH H Hi, thanks for your comment. Yes, it is possible for multicollinearity to occur with dummies and time trends. Imagine that you have time series data on the sales of ice creams. In the summer there will be higher sales than the winter. You could either model this using a variable like temperature, or indirectly using a dummy which is 1 when it is summer, and 0 otherwise. These variables will be highly collinear, because they are both attempting to measure the same thing. Intuitively regression is going to find it hard to differentiate between the effects of the dummy vs the temperature variable, and hence collinearity may be a problem here. Hope that helps! Bests, Ben

  • @spikeymikey9494
    @spikeymikey9494 8 лет назад +1

    Thanks for answering my previous question. I was wondering if you could answer my question which is related to multicollinearity. The question gives you 4 auxillary regressions. One of them is... logX1 (t ratios) 0.96 (2.56) -0.83logX2 (3.49) 0.95logX3 (5.66) 0.6logX4 (3.79). I presume the parentheses are standard errors. But how do you perform an f test on that to confirm multicollinearity (related to previous part of the question).? Your help would be greatly appreciated!

  • @siddharthadas86
    @siddharthadas86 7 лет назад +1

    Hi Ben your explanations are really good. Do you have any videos on multilevel or hierarchial modelling explaining the math of it?

  • @OutperformMP
    @OutperformMP 4 года назад

    Can someone explain why the standard errors for the B-coefficients are getting bigger because of the multicollinearity?

    • @atrijitdas1704
      @atrijitdas1704 4 года назад

      have a look at the formula derived for standard error of estimates of coefficients in whatever book you are using. You'll find that it has a term involving correlation of the independent variables. A high correlation, that is Multicollinearity, hence inflates the standard error

  • @MeghanaHM
    @MeghanaHM 4 года назад

    Why does this occur only in regression problems and not in classification ?

  • @Ben2020able
    @Ben2020able 10 лет назад +2

    thanks man
    why do you think when we make centering for our variables the collinearity disappear?

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  10 лет назад +1

      Hi, thanks for your message. Making variables standardised can reduce correlation between the two estimators in question. However, it does not remove collinearity in general between two variables. Hope that helps! Best, Ben

  • @fatimahzainaldain5895
    @fatimahzainaldain5895 4 года назад

    This is good

  • @gesaffelstein9525
    @gesaffelstein9525 10 лет назад

    will the estimates of Beta 1 and Beta 2 be unbiased or biased?
    Thanks for the great video.

  • @zes3813
    @zes3813 5 лет назад

    wrg, can conclux any nmw

  • @naman1464
    @naman1464 5 лет назад

    American English is the worst. I love British form. Atleast you are able to understand what a person is saying

    • @TJAcademyofficial
      @TJAcademyofficial 4 года назад

      For more helpful videos on the subject, Subscribe TJ Academy
      ruclips.net/channel/UCQ7Cbm57341QKdgZ_fTDGvw
      For Multicollinearity
      English (with EViews): ruclips.net/video/HoT78GCZExo/видео.html
      Urdu/Hindi: ruclips.net/video/KUtA6ZwyhpQ/видео.html (Headphone recommended for this video only)

  • @Neycompilations
    @Neycompilations 10 лет назад

    hey dude why u tryina act lik khan man ur not like khan, khan is 10x better

    • @axe863
      @axe863 10 лет назад +1

      Your mama is so fat that she has a condition number over 9000!!!!

    • @coolstone25
      @coolstone25 9 лет назад +8

      @nyecompilations you should probably go to khan than troll here and criticize for no reason while you yourself have nothing productive to contribute.