Mazda CX-3 AWD vs Mazda CX-5 AWD - 4x4 test on rollers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- Join us on Facebook: / stacjakontrolitrakcji
Follow us on Instagram: / 4x4_tests_on_rollers
4x4 test on rollers:
Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sky-G AT i-ACTIV AWD - Active Torque Split (ATS) (2017)
vs
Mazda CX-5 2.2 Sky-D AT i-ACTIV AWD - Active Torque Split (ATS) (2014)
#duszaniespokojna #mazdacx3 #mazdacx5
I was searching for this. Tranks! If i buy a Mazda CX3 will be 2.0 2wd. If i want a 4x4 SUV, will be a Vitara 1.4t 4x4. Both are nearly same price, now I have to think well about.
Here is CX-3 vs Vitara:
ruclips.net/video/eIsTsQRJMwM/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/KGcrb-cDRgM/видео.html
win for the Mazda CX-3 because same engine but less weight for the CX-3, and maybe newer algorithms in the CX-3
so the way i see it, mazda engineers arent trying to make the AWD system suitable for offroading or anythign like that, its simply there to tick the checkbox of being able to send SOME torque to the rear. I think it really only helps on acceleration from stopping at the lights, to stop chirping and wheelspin on hard acceleration. Apparently the mazda system starts off in awd 50/50 lock every time whereas many others start off in 2wd and introduce the rears whne slip is detected. Its just a more sensible approach for the use of an electromagnetic coupling (cheaper simpler and more common) which isnt as god as hydraulic or worm gear n cam systems in terms of reliability and clamping force. The real downsie is that it appears they really havent focused on any decent kind of brake traction control, it seems the diffs just spin and spin, and if both have no traction, well it just brakes one side in the hope that things might get better further down the road...
cosync Here is some explanation: ruclips.net/video/VF6nRPD_xyM/видео.html
I used to own a CX-5 and I can tell you most of the features on the car were there just to check the boxes. I was very disappointed with it.
This hasn't been my experience at all with my cx-3. In snow and off road I've never spun out that much. Not once
same as well, never lost traction like that
Turn on the wipers so Mazda algorithms will send power to the rear as wiper on is a key sensor.
Wiper is one of many factors, no difference for this test cause slippage has priority.
In snow and for some off road cx5 is good
Seems like the cx3 is better
Karla Barrera Yeap, it probably has better algorithms for traction control and awd system. However we don't know if current CX-5 is the same or not.
But in snow or some off road cx5 is better
Mazda makes the worst AWD systems and the newer CX-9 it continues. Even Motor Trend longterm test said the rear wheels do not do much on the CX-9.
The only cars that pass the triple roller test is the subaru o es.
@@karlkarlng Nope, there is much much more cars which can pass triple roller test.
Mazda awd is for on road stability. It adjusts constantly to keep traction while driving in different road conditions. They have stated it's not for any type of off road use.
@manphantom666 Yes, I know that, but it won't change a thing. Slippage factor is the most important, it makes awd system to work at 100% of its abbilities.
@manphantom666 Unfortunately Prius is not available in my country 😐
Oh just now sexy MAZDA
conclusion: Mazda awd is garbage!
Mazda awd is performance oriented, not traction oriented. But even though the CX-3 could pass all tests. Soon we will see CX-30 which has redesigned software.
As to responder to this lame initial response said, this is performance focused. Had mine in deep snow, as well as wet here in northwest US, also as well as on a road course in dry and even heavy rain. I RACED in SCCA and never seen a road vehicle this good. Please drive thru.
turn tcs off!
3:22