This is good content. Important content for people who are interested in this stuff. Or it should be. Why don't these guys give a sh*t about audio quality? This is the equivalent of well written, timely articles being distributed on soggy toilet paper. 300K subscribers and climbing but the audio says "amateur night". Not acceptable.
The best of the other economists who focus on China are more pessimistic about the future of its economy. I wonder if this guy has an ulterior motive to be more positive about China than he otherwise would be.
They need to improve the audio quality of this pod. It’s embarrassing. And not difficult to fix, takes one short consult from an audio engineer and a few hundred bucks worth of equipment. C’mon guys.
The U.S. maintained its embargo on China during the Great Chinese Famine (1959-1961), discouraging other nations from sending food, confident that millions of deaths from starvation would ensure China’s permanent collapse. Consumers worldwide are now frustrated with the influx of affordable goods from China. The British opium nearly did them in, and surely these tariffs and sanctions will finish them off for good this time. Meanwhile, China’s GDP growth is at 5%-a clear sign that the nation is finally collapsing. The Chinese government is denying its citizens from enjoying these benefits that US citizens enjoy: economic inequality, persistent inflation, stagnant real wages over the past five decades, exorbitant healthcare costs, an education system burdened with soaring tuition fees, and $1.7 trillion in student loan debt, with the average borrower, owing $38,000. Inadequate public transportation, racial inequality, mass incarceration, militarized policing, crumbling infrastructure, unaffordable housing, homelessness, the opioid epidemic, and rampant gun violence. The US government is very stable, and US citizens will enjoy those benefits regardless of the chosen leader.
Xi's concept that his country should nor rely on others but the others should have to rely on China is not sinister. I wish the West governments would heed this Xi thought.
When China opened up, they had nothing. So they have to do a two-side-out: meaning input all the necessary stuffs to manufacturing the final product and sell them outside China. They had a huge debate then because tis is very risky. And Deng settled it by claiming the World's main trend is PEACE. Now China is forced to delink itself from West because US-led West is containing China: a Lose-Lose situation.
He is doubling down on the export economy rather than trying to shift to a domestic consumption model...I am not sure how he is lower dependence on foreign markets/countries.
Scott Kennedy is one of the most objective American scolar.
This is good content. Important content for people who are interested in this stuff. Or it should be. Why don't these guys give a sh*t about audio quality? This is the equivalent of well written, timely articles being distributed on soggy toilet paper. 300K subscribers and climbing but the audio says "amateur night". Not acceptable.
The best of the other economists who focus on China are more pessimistic about the future of its economy. I wonder if this guy has an ulterior motive to be more positive about China than he otherwise would be.
They need to improve the audio quality of this pod. It’s embarrassing. And not difficult to fix, takes one short consult from an audio engineer and a few hundred bucks worth of equipment. C’mon guys.
The U.S. maintained its embargo on China during the Great Chinese Famine (1959-1961), discouraging other nations from sending food, confident that millions of deaths from starvation would ensure China’s permanent collapse.
Consumers worldwide are now frustrated with the influx of affordable goods from China. The British opium nearly did them in, and surely these tariffs and sanctions will finish them off for good this time.
Meanwhile, China’s GDP growth is at 5%-a clear sign that the nation is finally collapsing.
The Chinese government is denying its citizens from enjoying these benefits that US citizens enjoy:
economic inequality, persistent inflation, stagnant real wages over the past five decades, exorbitant healthcare costs, an education system burdened with soaring tuition fees, and $1.7 trillion in student loan debt, with the average borrower, owing $38,000. Inadequate public transportation, racial inequality, mass incarceration, militarized policing, crumbling infrastructure, unaffordable housing, homelessness, the opioid epidemic, and rampant gun violence.
The US government is very stable, and US citizens will enjoy those benefits regardless of the chosen leader.
You are boring.
Xi's concept that his country should nor rely on others but the others should have to rely on China is not sinister. I wish the West governments would heed this Xi thought.
When China opened up, they had nothing. So they have to do a two-side-out: meaning input all the necessary stuffs to manufacturing the final product and sell them outside China. They had a huge debate then because tis is very risky. And Deng settled it by claiming the World's main trend is PEACE. Now China is forced to delink itself from West because US-led West is containing China: a Lose-Lose situation.
He is doubling down on the export economy rather than trying to shift to a domestic consumption model...I am not sure how he is lower dependence on foreign markets/countries.
Not sinister, only inane. Amazing you don't realize the absurdity of your comment.