IEEE journals are often overhyped and not particularly useful. Many IEEE journals have become victims of paper factories, with some papers seemingly intended to confuse readers with jargon and complex formulas or to omit essential details due to page limitations. I only read IEEE papers from certain authors, and over time, I’ve learned to identify authors from paper factories, which I now avoid. Additionally, citations in IEEE journals are generally low, with citation counts often artificially inflated through cross-citations among paper factory groups who cite their own work.
I am freelancing since 8 years. Should I need IEEE paper published so then I could get a good job? is it worth? or should I just go and apply for jobs right now
People like you are giving importance to ieee, and they are doing nepotism, most of the journals are based on name of the fellow, what work you have done and who have reviewed it, depends on it, give name of fellow and get your paper acceptes in ieee. Do you think you know everything on the published paper?
Hi! It's a tough topic as well. Nepotism exists in IEEE and in academia in general. On the bright side, I have seen a few papers with big names rejected because of the quality issues or lack of novel ideas. So maybe this is slowly changing.
@@chuscience Yes, thanks for understanding the issue, I can also show the transactions in IEEE PES with big names and with poor quality, actually the problem comes when people blindly support IEEE journals as a quality mark. It should not be like that, as knowledge cannot be restricted into small publishing groups only. IEEE PES group should show more optimism in the review process, instead of following an egoistic approach, as we don't know novel idea can come from anyone. It really hurts when you get rejection without a valid reason and getting comments from the reviewers full of technical glitches. Also, I am requesting to all the IEEE PES reviewer do not pretend, you know everything of the world, be humble and make sure have a right knowledge before making a comment on a topic.
When I review the paper I don't even look at the names. Even if it's the worst paper, I never reject and give the best constructive comments I can.... Sometimes it's my own ideas which I was in the process of implementing...
Very informative ! Thank u so much
Thank you! Very helpful!
IEEE journals are often overhyped and not particularly useful. Many IEEE journals have become victims of paper factories, with some papers seemingly intended to confuse readers with jargon and complex formulas or to omit essential details due to page limitations. I only read IEEE papers from certain authors, and over time, I’ve learned to identify authors from paper factories, which I now avoid. Additionally, citations in IEEE journals are generally low, with citation counts often artificially inflated through cross-citations among paper factory groups who cite their own work.
Thank you so much sir.
I am freelancing since 8 years. Should I need IEEE paper published so then I could get a good job? is it worth? or should I just go and apply for jobs right now
I'm not sure if you are trolling, if you are not in academia no need to publish usually
@@scroogietw6878 im not trolling anyone sir.. It was a genuine question.. Im from india. I don't know if it is helpful here to publish any papers etc.
@@patilmm123 Are you in academia? If no, then get a job. If yes, ask your supervisor on tips.
$1500?! ouch
People like you are giving importance to ieee, and they are doing nepotism, most of the journals are based on name of the fellow, what work you have done and who have reviewed it, depends on it, give name of fellow and get your paper acceptes in ieee. Do you think you know everything on the published paper?
Hi! It's a tough topic as well. Nepotism exists in IEEE and in academia in general. On the bright side, I have seen a few papers with big names rejected because of the quality issues or lack of novel ideas. So maybe this is slowly changing.
@@chuscience Yes, thanks for understanding the issue, I can also show the transactions in IEEE PES with big names and with poor quality, actually the problem comes when people blindly support IEEE journals as a quality mark. It should not be like that, as knowledge cannot be restricted into small publishing groups only. IEEE PES group should show more optimism in the review process, instead of following an egoistic approach, as we don't know novel idea can come from anyone. It really hurts when you get rejection without a valid reason and getting comments from the reviewers full of technical glitches. Also, I am requesting to all the IEEE PES reviewer do not pretend, you know everything of the world, be humble and make sure have a right knowledge before making a comment on a topic.
When I review the paper I don't even look at the names. Even if it's the worst paper, I never reject and give the best constructive comments I can.... Sometimes it's my own ideas which I was in the process of implementing...