Am I the only one that finds it Poetic, that we had to invent Transformers to solve for the distribution of Primes? On a serious note, phenomenal interview! So grateful to Sequoia for putting these together!
AI didn't beat minecraft in 20s, the 20s run was a tool assisted run by a human who slowed down the time, so that when played back it went fast. It is a demonstration of perfect play given no limits on speed of actions, but still by a human.
The point was to show there is basically no upper limit of how fast this game could theoretically be played, basically incomprehensible to humans, and that AI could work this way in all fields.
Ok but he said it was AI that beat it. It was not and invalidates his point that AI vs human is incomprehensible to humans in terms of it being beyond us. It is exactly here constructed by humans and understandable by humans as it was human that did it in a different time scale. Let alone the 20s run was on a super rare seed that setup very special conditions. Basically totally useless connection to the discussion.
@@somenygaard Romanians are a powerful race with an ancient and great history, his answer doesn’t surprise me, there’s always enemies when you are great.
That went completely wrong, folks. Vlad and Tudor from Harmonic have completely messed it up. How can you talk in a presentation about what will soon be achieved? How can you talk enthusiastically about what will be possible in the future with your project? People rightly think: Oh, since two are developing something, they want to deliver a great system. People think it's not interesting at the moment and they turn away and forget about Harmonic. No, not like that. The right thing to do is to point out what has already been achieved with pride and with examples and with enthusiasm. T o present the existing product as an excellent product. You can always improve it. You see that with every software. Endless updates. Endless revisions. So, I think Vlad and Tudor from Harmonic have done themselves a disservice here.
This is ridiculous. Speculating about the future is often desirable and encouraged. This is how we envision what our next steps can be and how we communicate to others our intent. It may bring distinct organizations and individuals together to work towards a common cause. Finally, many people find this quite interesting. Look back at just the history of the internet or computation. At every turn, people were envisioning what could come next. And come next it did. I cannot fathom how you manage to develop such an egregiously wrong opinion.
How long would it have taken for AI to create itself accidentally? The process of cellular replication is vastly more complex than any computer code but yet we continue to pretend that evolutionary theory is how all life evolved from a common ancestor. Even more absurd is that everything came from nothing, life from non life, everything from nothing.
@@viniciusalves308 in some sense we are just representations of the systems going on inside us. How many trillions of bacteria are in symbiosis with us for example? I think there might not be any practical difference between representation and the thing projecting.
Am I the only one that finds it Poetic, that we had to invent Transformers to solve for the distribution of Primes?
On a serious note, phenomenal interview! So grateful to Sequoia for putting these together!
"Autobots! Roll out!"
Wow, is that true?
AI didn't beat minecraft in 20s, the 20s run was a tool assisted run by a human who slowed down the time, so that when played back it went fast. It is a demonstration of perfect play given no limits on speed of actions, but still by a human.
The point was to show there is basically no upper limit of how fast this game could theoretically be played, basically incomprehensible to humans, and that AI could work this way in all fields.
Ok but he said it was AI that beat it. It was not and invalidates his point that AI vs human is incomprehensible to humans in terms of it being beyond us.
It is exactly here constructed by humans and understandable by humans as it was human that did it in a different time scale.
Let alone the 20s run was on a super rare seed that setup very special conditions. Basically totally useless connection to the discussion.
Thank you for that Correction, I was going to do it as well before I read your reply.
woooow i can stop shoutting in my room i am a mathematics person cheers i wish i could be partt of this tteam .
Interesting.
People were saying the same thing during the neutal net revival of the early 10s. Still waiting.
"Given we can't do arithmetic today with LLMs" LOFL Burn!
good stuff 👍
Cool video - bad intro music
intertesing
If the founder of Robinhood is in a startup, you can't be sure that the consumer is going to get screwed.
So it’s the same thing as what the O1 team did
no it is not.
are they Romanians?
Ew no
@@AISlopForHumansWhy ew? He’s from Bulgaria which is pretty close to Romania
@@somenygaard Romanians are a powerful race with an ancient and great history, his answer doesn’t surprise me, there’s always enemies when you are great.
Tudor is Romanian.
They are selling snake oil! 😂
That went completely wrong, folks. Vlad and Tudor from
Harmonic have completely messed it up.
How can you talk in a presentation about what will soon
be achieved?
How can you talk enthusiastically about what will be possible
in the future with your project?
People rightly think: Oh, since two are developing something,
they want to deliver a great system.
People think it's not interesting at the moment and they
turn away and forget about Harmonic.
No, not like that. The right thing to do is to point out what has
already been achieved with pride and with examples
and with enthusiasm. T
o present the existing product as an excellent product.
You can always improve it.
You see that with every software. Endless updates.
Endless revisions.
So, I think Vlad and Tudor from Harmonic have done
themselves a disservice here.
This is ridiculous. Speculating about the future is often desirable and encouraged. This is how we envision what our next steps can be and how we communicate to others our intent. It may bring distinct organizations and individuals together to work towards a common cause. Finally, many people find this quite interesting.
Look back at just the history of the internet or computation. At every turn, people were envisioning what could come next. And come next it did.
I cannot fathom how you manage to develop such an egregiously wrong opinion.
How long would it have taken for AI to create itself accidentally?
The process of cellular replication is vastly more complex than any computer code but yet we continue to pretend that evolutionary theory is how all life evolved from a common ancestor. Even more absurd is that everything came from nothing, life from non life, everything from nothing.
AI did create itself accidentally, it's us. All life is biology's attempt to self organize. Now we've figured out how to rebuild ourselves in silicon.
@@Crux69 molecular biology doesn’t happen accidentally
ruclips.net/video/v36_v4hsB-Y/видео.htmlsi=3CZjJ5rIVRfhZxzQ
@@Crux69 is it "ourselves" if it's on silicon or is it a representation only?
@@viniciusalves308 in some sense we are just representations of the systems going on inside us. How many trillions of bacteria are in symbiosis with us for example? I think there might not be any practical difference between representation and the thing projecting.
Terence Tao, not Terry Tao haha
"Terry" is often used as a diminutive or nickname for "Terence."
Everyone calls him Terry