The 2nd, 3rd and 4th diagrams are wrong unfortunately. Since we assume no axial shortening and these forces are applied directly over the support, there will not be rotation. Also the 4th diagram violates a golden principle in that if you have a symmetrical structure and symmetrical loading, the response (i.e. deflection) of the structure will also be symmetrical, which your diagram indicates is not.
@@educationforall1442 it will not look like what you've shown. Please improve in the future because so many people will watch your video and get it wrong.. Just a humble suggestion,
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
The 2nd, 3rd and 4th diagrams are wrong unfortunately. Since we assume no axial shortening and these forces are applied directly over the support, there will not be rotation. Also the 4th diagram violates a golden principle in that if you have a symmetrical structure and symmetrical loading, the response (i.e. deflection) of the structure will also be symmetrical, which your diagram indicates is not.
Thanks for this comment.
it is wrong... You have to satisfy Joint compatability and also slope at joints cannot be zero as it is a rigid joint
Thank you for your response. I guess it's just to show how the diagram will look like
@@educationforall1442 it will not look like what you've shown. Please improve in the future because so many people will watch your video and get it wrong.. Just a humble suggestion,
Thank you sir I will definitely do it in a correct way. 👍🙏