You can check out this link to solve that problem. www.autodesk.com/support/technical/article/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/ROBOT-rc-slab-design-error-required-types-are-not-ascribed-to-SLS-combinations-Calculations-may-be-incorrect.html
thank you so much dear could you help me? I made an analysis of a flat slab using the program and analyzed it manually again using Simplified frame method (distribution moment ) I found difference in result the moment in the RSA is very large than my manual result. Is it logical for the difference in results to be like this? Note When I used reduction of force above columns the results were close. can i use reduction of force above columns in any case? ... BS 8110 section of columns all (50X50cm) the length of spans in X axis (6.5 m) two spans every span 6.5 m the length of span in Y axis (5.5 m) two spans every span 5.5 m Live load 2 KN/m2 died load 3 KN/m2 thickens of slab 22 cm
thanks guy. so clear. i designed a slab in 20 mins on first time.
Great tutorial, thank you!
i hope you can provide long term deflection check just like CSI SAFE..
very useful tutorial
Great video , Thank you !
You're welcome!
@@ARbyEV I would like to design a slab foundation for a timber frame house , Can I use this method?
Yes. But you need to define boundary condition as soil layers with respective unit weights.
Some how I am getting steel bars only for bottom of plate .@@ARbyEV
Cheers! 🤝🙋♂
Hello, i get a message stating that required types not ascribed to SLS combinations, what could be the problem?
You can check out this link to solve that problem. www.autodesk.com/support/technical/article/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/ROBOT-rc-slab-design-error-required-types-are-not-ascribed-to-SLS-combinations-Calculations-may-be-incorrect.html
@@ARbyEV thanks
thank you so much dear
could you help me?
I made an analysis of a flat slab using the program and analyzed it manually again using Simplified frame method (distribution moment ) I found difference in result
the moment in the RSA is very large than my manual result.
Is it logical for the difference in results to be like this?
Note
When I used reduction of force above columns the results were close.
can i use reduction of force above columns in any case?
...
BS 8110
section of columns all (50X50cm)
the length of spans in X axis (6.5 m) two spans every span 6.5 m
the length of span in Y axis (5.5 m) two spans every span 5.5 m
Live load 2 KN/m2
died load 3 KN/m2
thickens of slab 22 cm
I'll check it out tomorrow.
@@ARbyEV okey ... thank you
Incredibly long winded for 1 slab.