Generally speaking as a parent, school really has progressed tremendously. Content like this is key. The idea that learning must be painful and boring is outdated. History and science are incredibly interesting and dramatic. We shouldn't be ashamed of that.
Analogies like "...and never getting the toy back" and "Like a potluck" makes it SO much easier to visualise the concept! It's things that I've experienced myself and can relate to. Very well! 👌
All i can say is that i have never understood bonds, these gods just described it in 3 minutes, i wish I could like the video twice, actually scratch that i wanna like it infinite times, because you, you have infinitely helped me.
Mindddd blown. You have cleared some of my questions of this study session in just minutes. I was losing interest by not getting right help, thankfully, finally the right video.
Really excellent stuff - nicely explained and beautifully visualised. My only quibble would be that the tug-of-war in the ionic bonding bit is almost entirely mythical - usually the two ions have already gained or lost electrons long before they meet - but the myth is still a part of standard chemistry teaching, for whatever reason, so, fair enough. :) At least you went straight from there to ionic lattices! Far too many sources stop with 'an ionic bond' forming, as if there was then a molecule of NaCl floating around...
@@angu4878 I recommend the Royal Society of Chemistry's 'Chemical Misconceptions' on this. If you have any specific questions, though, I'm happy to try and answer them here.
Because we cannot see atoms and only their imprint on scanning technology these models are wrong and primitive. Think of it like this.. a giant field of energy that is and isn't at the same time as well as flickering back and fourth between states. All throughout this field membrane are pinches, tweaks, flips, and twists. Because this all is all then it is also parts in retrospection and opposition to being all. To all is part and to part is all. Each atom is and isn't within its own. Each atom is created and exists in relationship to each other atom and vice versa. You define yourself by comparing or sizing yourself up to others or things-situations. This "outside" "other" things define you and help make you be what you see yourself to be. Atoms are the same.. we only know metal by comparing it to water. Water to wood and air to rock.. we learn more about something when we see what it is not and then by deduction and reduction come to a conclusion. Atoms are intersecting waves making waves that intersect and make waves. The center of an atom cannot be seen and the electron signature is the only mystery expression we have of the geni inside. Your mind picks things apart as it's functions are to split energy (ideas-functions) and connect/combined energy. Splitters and or lumpers. If reality is created by our perception and will and reality is atoms and we are atoms then we are conscious atomic reality being funneled down through a human body so that we may do whatever. When dealing with atoms and reality remember.. you ONLY have YOUR perception and or the belief in other's perceptions which is still your perception of their perception. All atoms are one and connected as a single whole. Our minds split and divide in relation to how we feel, think, want or need. Our human specimen of a body does aromatically set some perimeters in perception and application capabilities.. for example we cannot fly by flapping our arms etc. Atoms are also functions too. For example an atom "dancing" becomes and is the dancing. The singing atom literally is only the sound singing. This is how you become what you do and what you do is what you become. Some people like to name things... Some people like to know how things function. Thus things have been named things just because or named things in which they do like a hammer or a screwdriver. Take any thing or idea (all things are ideas and all ideas are things - both are buzzing energy on diff frequencies) and try to define it. Look at the dictionary. Now that word uses other words to explain and de-scribe that word so you gotta go define those words and so on. You will find that words used to explain a word don't have anything to do with that word and those words are made up of other words that only have meaning by bringing in more words without a meaning in theirself. You will deviate far from the original word or even come right back to it! In fact the word you tried to define will end up defining itself by using itself. This is insanity. So when it comes to someone really knowing you or where you are coming from... That is very rare and special. Hope this ramble sum up helps someone. RESEARCH! CORRELATE! LOVE!
This was explained So well that I literally was trippin out! :-P Thanks bunches! Came here for wanting to learn this and you hit the nail on the head, TED-ed!
Great video! Only the depiction of a DNA molecule at 1:33 as an example of covalent bonds feels very confusing or misleading to me because the most prominent bonds seen in this image are the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases...
Just luv the way you explain things un this is my favoutite,,In some cases atoms could form more bonds than you would expect but they better have a really gud reason to do so,, . A masterpiece lol .
How is it wrong? You just said my statement about hydrogen forces vs covalents bonds is true, which implies that covalent bonds are the most abundant type of bonds in DNA. What's in question here isn't about why electrostatic interactions like hydrogen forces and covalent bonds are important, but about which bond is the most abundant and I think I was clear about that. However, you are right about hydrogen forces being important, it's why we have A base pairing with T and G with C.
The entire phosphodiester backbone and the purine or pyrimidine bases are held together with covalent bonds. Hydrogen bonding only enables base pairing between two strands. Without the H-bonds, double-stranded DNA wouldn't form (nor would interesting secondary structures in ssDNA or ssRNA, but that's another story), so they are critical, but you only get 2 per A-T pair or 3 per G-C pair, while each nucleotide comprises more than 30 covalent bonds.
i get why two water atoms do a covalent bond, the have the same amount of electrons&protons, but why is the O of h2o not taking away the electrons of the water atoms, it has a stronger "magnetic" force? what am I missing? :D
To my knowledge there is no material that completely resists erosion/abrasion. And yes, you can wear through the skin on your hands by rubbing them together enough.
after giving an electron sodium get positively and chlorine get negatively charged .then one negatively charged chlorine and one sodium should eliminate the negative-positive charge. but why sodium ion or chlorine ion paired with six other as mentioned in the video?
What the heck that's actually a good question. I'm also extremely confused on how exactly the electrons even orbit the atom since the current observations are that the don't even have a fixed path but have a superposition like wtf is happening ??????
It’s difficult to explain, but when atoms get close, their orbitals can overlap and form molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals are usually lower in energy than individual atomic orbitals, so every orbital combination forms what we call a bond.
Hydrogen "bonds" aren't actually bonds b/c unlike real bonds (like covalent, ionic, metallic), they don't possess any orbital overlap (sigma, pi, delta, etc) between two atoms. They're a type of inter (and sometimes "intra") molecular force.
Time has to be in all other energy so it's uncondensed and acts like a ghost even though it can become more condensed and more compact the more compacted it...... becomes the more it pulls on other energy because it becomes condenser because it packs more of its own energy into itself because the energy can act like a ghost.... So it's just uncondensed enough to be compact inside other energy but it stays uncondensed enough... To act like a ghost but then condense enough to connect itself to the other field and pull that field and make it come closer to itself
eletrons dont rotate or orbit at all, it's just a way to represent atoms but it's innacurate. It's just made this way to be easier to explain without using quantum physics.
(( quantum physics )) almost as good as the evolution got a question you can't answer that ok just say evolution for example but how sir evolution my boy evolution and if there still and happy smack em with quantum physics and if there familiar with the concept bash them with special relativity basically what im getting at is you will never catch out the author of a story wich is exactly what all of this is starting to look like fiction
@Reggie Science is hard. You should stick to things like believing in something for no reason, or better yet, in spite of reasons against it. Everything becomes soo simple when you just believe whatever you want. Congratulations, you're well on your way to knowing and understanding nothing, instead of settling for the lesser- only knowing some things (which are verifiable), like dumb science. Remember, the sheep doesn't need Math or Science to be useful to the shepherd.
Is a scaled up model, a human sized mechanical working simulation of this ever made? I still can't understand how a very small ball rotating around a large ball can attach to another small ball rotating around another a big ball.
Because of how orbitals and electrons work I'm not sure somebody would be able to make one of those since electrons move so fast and orbitals are so complex and mind bending
It becomes positively charge as it has given an electron....And the atom receiving it becomes negatively charge so they both attract as one is negative and the other is positive(Negative pole attracts)
![DDG & G Herbo - Nosey [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I9Ra0Zc2NlQ/mqdefault.jpg)
This was far more informative, explained much better and more easier to understand than the classes in school.
Exactly
It's because of animation
yep
Yessssss, because of that Animation
Generally speaking as a parent, school really has progressed tremendously. Content like this is key. The idea that learning must be painful and boring is outdated. History and science are incredibly interesting and dramatic. We shouldn't be ashamed of that.
I really enjoy the animation of the atoms, very clean and understandable.
Analogies like "...and never getting the toy back" and "Like a potluck" makes it SO much easier to visualise the concept! It's things that I've experienced myself and can relate to.
Very well! 👌
Yes, using analogies can be super helpful.
Hello Ted ED. I am 11 and your videos have made me ace my science classes. My science teacher thinks that I am cheating or something. LOL
Quetzalcoatlus, we share the same fate then, must admit Ted Ed is pretty fun and educational
Good name by the way, Hatzegopteryx is my favorite, although Dimorphodon is a very close second.
Quetzalcoatlus well you are actually cheating
How?
oof is she mad at you?
This is something i got 16 years ago. Thanks for reminding. Very good explaining. One of your best movies imo.
This is the only way I can understand anything
Apart from maybe my History teacher, she's amazing and actually understands that students are people
extremely simplified but yeah - if this were taught this way in school I would get interested in chemistry way sooner
This is the 2nd great video from George Zaidan and Charles Morton I have seen this week. Need more teachers like this.
you taught me in 3 minutes what my teacher couldnt do in 4 weeks
All i can say is that i have never understood bonds, these gods just described it in 3 minutes, i wish I could like the video twice, actually scratch that i wanna like it infinite times, because you, you have infinitely helped me.
You guys are just wonderful. Pictures and animations are great ways to facilitate learning if properly made. Great works.
@astroferox883 lol bc this comment 10 years old
Mindddd blown. You have cleared some of my questions of this study session in just minutes.
I was losing interest by not getting right help, thankfully, finally the right video.
Lewis’s notation explains that more simply
Wish my chemistry teacher could explain like that.
best animation on youtube. thank you!
I just love how you use so many different styles of animation 💓 I do have my favorites, but I like all of them
Where have you been all my chem life!!! Things feel a lot more clear seeing after seeing this!
Incredible animations!
This is an excellent visualization of bonding.
as a 7th grade, this was still MUCH more helpful than our teachers at school, thanks!
Really excellent stuff - nicely explained and beautifully visualised. My only quibble would be that the tug-of-war in the ionic bonding bit is almost entirely mythical - usually the two ions have already gained or lost electrons long before they meet - but the myth is still a part of standard chemistry teaching, for whatever reason, so, fair enough. :)
At least you went straight from there to ionic lattices! Far too many sources stop with 'an ionic bond' forming, as if there was then a molecule of NaCl floating around...
Could you elaborate more please? About ionic bonding. Thankyou.
@@angu4878 I recommend the Royal Society of Chemistry's 'Chemical Misconceptions' on this.
If you have any specific questions, though, I'm happy to try and answer them here.
woah, still responding after 8 years :O props to u dude
Amazing lesson ☺️
i still can't picture them with the model of atom in quantum mechanics
right? how do these both models fit together?
Because we cannot see atoms and only their imprint on scanning technology these models are wrong and primitive. Think of it like this.. a giant field of energy that is and isn't at the same time as well as flickering back and fourth between states. All throughout this field membrane are pinches, tweaks, flips, and twists. Because this all is all then it is also parts in retrospection and opposition to being all. To all is part and to part is all. Each atom is and isn't within its own. Each atom is created and exists in relationship to each other atom and vice versa. You define yourself by comparing or sizing yourself up to others or things-situations. This "outside" "other" things define you and help make you be what you see yourself to be. Atoms are the same.. we only know metal by comparing it to water. Water to wood and air to rock.. we learn more about something when we see what it is not and then by deduction and reduction come to a conclusion. Atoms are intersecting waves making waves that intersect and make waves. The center of an atom cannot be seen and the electron signature is the only mystery expression we have of the geni inside. Your mind picks things apart as it's functions are to split energy (ideas-functions) and connect/combined energy. Splitters and or lumpers. If reality is created by our perception and will and reality is atoms and we are atoms then we are conscious atomic reality being funneled down through a human body so that we may do whatever. When dealing with atoms and reality remember.. you ONLY have YOUR perception and or the belief in other's perceptions which is still your perception of their perception. All atoms are one and connected as a single whole. Our minds split and divide in relation to how we feel, think, want or need. Our human specimen of a body does aromatically set some perimeters in perception and application capabilities.. for example we cannot fly by flapping our arms etc. Atoms are also functions too. For example an atom "dancing" becomes and is the dancing. The singing atom literally is only the sound singing. This is how you become what you do and what you do is what you become. Some people like to name things... Some people like to know how things function. Thus things have been named things just because or named things in which they do like a hammer or a screwdriver. Take any thing or idea (all things are ideas and all ideas are things - both are buzzing energy on diff frequencies) and try to define it. Look at the dictionary. Now that word uses other words to explain and de-scribe that word so you gotta go define those words and so on. You will find that words used to explain a word don't have anything to do with that word and those words are made up of other words that only have meaning by bringing in more words without a meaning in theirself. You will deviate far from the original word or even come right back to it! In fact the word you tried to define will end up defining itself by using itself. This is insanity. So when it comes to someone really knowing you or where you are coming from... That is very rare and special. Hope this ramble sum up helps someone. RESEARCH! CORRELATE! LOVE!
Hmm.. Search for Valence bond theory and hybridization. also VSEPR
continue simplifying such concepts please
This explanation is so totally easy to understand! Thank you for your creativity!
Thank you for this lovely video!
Amazing video!
Thank you so much, I like how you described the bonds.
On what basis do elements combine with other elements like in
HCl + H2O → H3O+ + Cl- why the reaction doesn't look like
HCl + H2O → H3ClO
H3ClO is energetically unstable, so if the atoms were in the position to form this or H3O+/Cl-, they would form the lower energy H3O+/Cl-.
TED-Ed is AMAZING
Hello ted ed this is my homework and this helps so much ty
thanks you teach better than even our textbook
This was explained So well that I literally was trippin out! :-P Thanks bunches! Came here for wanting to learn this and you hit the nail on the head, TED-ed!
Me learned something, me like!
Thanks for making this video. It helps me.
The pull of the nucleus keeps them attracted in a different location at all times. good question. watch quantum mechanics for a visual display.
Great video! Only the depiction of a DNA molecule at 1:33 as an example of covalent bonds feels very confusing or misleading to me because the most prominent bonds seen in this image are the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases...
really nice !##
please do a video on dot structure and # redox reactions
Just luv the way you explain things un this is my favoutite,,In some cases atoms could form more bonds than you would expect but they better have a really gud reason to do so,, . A masterpiece lol .
Thank you
PERFEITO!
How is it wrong? You just said my statement about hydrogen forces vs covalents bonds is true, which implies that covalent bonds are the most abundant type of bonds in DNA. What's in question here isn't about why electrostatic interactions like hydrogen forces and covalent bonds are important, but about which bond is the most abundant and I think I was clear about that. However, you are right about hydrogen forces being important, it's why we have A base pairing with T and G with C.
The entire phosphodiester backbone and the purine or pyrimidine bases are held together with covalent bonds. Hydrogen bonding only enables base pairing between two strands. Without the H-bonds, double-stranded DNA wouldn't form (nor would interesting secondary structures in ssDNA or ssRNA, but that's another story), so they are critical, but you only get 2 per A-T pair or 3 per G-C pair, while each nucleotide comprises more than 30 covalent bonds.
i get why two water atoms do a covalent bond, the have the same amount of electrons&protons, but why is the O of h2o not taking away the electrons of the water atoms, it has a stronger "magnetic" force? what am I missing? :D
figured it out already ^^
This was excellent.
To my knowledge there is no material that completely resists erosion/abrasion. And yes, you can wear through the skin on your hands by rubbing them together enough.
SO GOOD
Last year my 8th grade science teacher mr pencille always showed us your videos
after giving an electron sodium get positively and chlorine get negatively charged .then one negatively charged chlorine and one sodium should eliminate the negative-positive charge. but why sodium ion or chlorine ion paired with six other as mentioned in the video?
One question: is the pull force exerted by the electron on the proton the same as the force exerted by the proton on the electron
Thank you 8->
And that’s how it’s done 👌
awesome bro
this is so realisic woah
in 3 minutes i learned what my teachers could not properly explain to me in 3 weeks.
I still don't understand everything... If electrons orbit around the nucleus, how can atoms share one ?
What the heck that's actually a good question. I'm also extremely confused on how exactly the electrons even orbit the atom since the current observations are that the don't even have a fixed path but have a superposition like wtf is happening ??????
It’s difficult to explain, but when atoms get close, their orbitals can overlap and form molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals are usually lower in energy than individual atomic orbitals, so every orbital combination forms what we call a bond.
No momento certo Deus fará acontecer ❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I was thinking the same.. except, his examples clean the metals that ionizes a nasty bond.
What if you compiled your code and deleted your project files?
It's too difficult to reverse-engineer it!
How one electron pull another aren't they supposed to repel rach other? There must be another reason.
How is ionic bond a bond when its just apart
Hydrogen "bonds" aren't actually bonds b/c unlike real bonds (like covalent, ionic, metallic), they don't possess any orbital overlap (sigma, pi, delta, etc) between two atoms. They're a type of inter (and sometimes "intra") molecular force.
Why ado valence electrons have the most energy?
did anyone notice the cube with the nacl diagram
It's good to be the first one!! Not only to comment, but to watch as well!!
How to form a bond of single sodium and sulphur please tell me
too sort !!! WE WANT MOAR
Can atom 30 give 2 atoms away to be stable? If no, does that mean that d atoms cant bond?
Time has to be in all other energy so it's uncondensed and acts like a ghost even though it can become more condensed and more compact the more compacted it...... becomes the more it pulls on other energy because it becomes condenser because it packs more of its own energy into itself because the energy can act like a ghost.... So it's just uncondensed enough to be compact inside other energy but it stays uncondensed enough... To act like a ghost but then condense enough to connect itself to the other field and pull that field and make it come closer to itself
so do electron pair in covalent bonds rotate the nuclei (like other electrons)
eletrons dont rotate or orbit at all, it's just a way to represent atoms but it's innacurate. It's just made this way to be easier to explain without using quantum physics.
(( quantum physics )) almost as good as the evolution
got a question you can't answer that ok just say evolution for example
but how sir evolution my boy evolution and if there still and happy smack em with
quantum physics and if there familiar with the concept bash them with special relativity
basically what im getting at is you will never catch out the author of a story wich is exactly what all of this is starting to look like fiction
@Reggie Science is hard. You should stick to things like believing in something for no reason, or better yet, in spite of reasons against it. Everything becomes soo simple when you just believe whatever you want. Congratulations, you're well on your way to knowing and understanding nothing, instead of settling for the lesser- only knowing some things (which are verifiable), like dumb science. Remember, the sheep doesn't need Math or Science to be useful to the shepherd.
It’s good to learn 🤘🏽🥰
Is a scaled up model, a human sized mechanical working simulation of this ever made?
I still can't understand how a very small ball rotating around a large ball can attach to another small ball rotating around another a big ball.
Because of how orbitals and electrons work I'm not sure somebody would be able to make one of those since electrons move so fast and orbitals are so complex and mind bending
Does anybody know the nature of bounds? Why atoms are so interested to give or take electrons? What laws are standing behind this?
Bonds are lower in energy than individual atomic orbitals, so atoms seeking the lowest energy state will form bonds.
is there any single molecule that is visible to the human eye or a magnifying glass?
For once I wished this Chemistry lesson to continue beyond 3 & half mins
Sometimes they share, but one has the electron most of the time. Like water
It becomes an ion when it loses or gains an electron.
Which means if I have positive Jame and negative Jame, they will bond with each other and become James Bond!
When Oxygen and Hydrogen bond: Oh
So how do molecules bond/stick together?
I want the reality of bond, how exactly electron bonds??
This is not actual.
In covalent bonds, the how the bonded electron moves?
Science, great.
great. zabrdast... video
you didn't explain Hydrogen Bonding and Metallic Bonding
So according yours explanation Colon law doesn't exist?
I have a question my chemistry teacher didnt know the answer to:
after an atom loses its electron, what happens to it??
It becomes positively charge as it has given an electron....And the atom receiving it becomes negatively charge so they both attract as one is negative and the other is positive(Negative pole attracts)
forgot to mention that an atom can give away more than one electron to a single atom
RickyRider35. U brilliant
RickyRider35 Wrong pay more attention
they did in the beginning
ok so in my country on the streets it is written no salt please be carefull while you are driving and it says naci witha minus sign on it inTerEStiNG
The one thing I don't understand is why H2O has an angle of less than 180 degrees to it's atoms.
Great that it is a good size home and reinforced, but the wood floors are toxic. Shipping container floors are treated with pesticides.
Well possibly, is it possible you commented on the wrong video
that H2O molecule wasn't polar. looked more like CO2
Can someone turn this concept into a micro minecraft-type game please?
0:16 OH i get it
i just have that in cemetery class... the only difference is that i actually got it this time
Hunter Rodrigez cemetery class? Do you bury people?
Wow
After watching this video i am checking my body for my all bonds are ok
Electrons are modeled as waves in physics but like balls in chemistry hmm
And “gravity” is no where to be found… electromagnetism is king.
Crash course chemistry on youtube is very useful
wow !!!!!