Karl Fabergé and the Russian Imperial Family (Dr. Géza von Habsburg - July 14, 2011)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024

Комментарии • 42

  • @whigparty6180
    @whigparty6180 3 года назад +1

    Nice to hear Dr von Habsburg, although I knew most of the content beforehand.

  • @maximhollandnederlandthene7640

    This man has a lot of humor, not like you can say about other Germans.😅
    Great lecture and thanks for posting. 🙂

  • @dimacosi
    @dimacosi 11 лет назад +5

    Made quite a few mistakes in his speech. Revolution of 1916, Swedish bank, coronation in St Petersburg ?!!!

  • @Whoiskevinjones
    @Whoiskevinjones Год назад

    What a missed opportunity for the VMFA to not have the speaker at least touch on how the Faberge collection came to the museum in Richmond. Disappointing.

  • @ruthmukti53
    @ruthmukti53 8 лет назад

    Impressionante!!

  • @rhodaseptilici3816
    @rhodaseptilici3816 4 года назад

    The archduke is an extraordinary speaker erudite, fine enchanting....it is von not van please mr director

  • @olavwilhelm6843
    @olavwilhelm6843 4 года назад +1

    very interesting but a better speaker would add points to this video

  • @am1966ath
    @am1966ath 10 лет назад

    The Queen of Sweden (Silvia) have Faberge ?? have never seen any photos..the Faberge in the Thai royal collection are usually Buddhas that are not on public display.

    • @plooh5316
      @plooh5316 4 года назад

      He unwisely chose to lecture without the benefit of written notes, and made some slight mistakes. I think he meant to say the King of Sweden or the Swedish royal family and not , queen of Sweden(Silvia). That royal family probably received pre-revolution, Faberge items from the czar, or from family members, or subjects such as the Swedish / Russian Nobel family who were very significant Faberge customers, or from direct purchases.

  • @КакКак-э9ч
    @КакКак-э9ч 3 года назад

    Добрый вечер!!! ккаким образом можно выяснить, какую аристократическую (дворянскую ) В период революции вырезали , как считают все,. На сколько я знаю пра-прабабушка была вроде католичкой. И их глушили и те и другие. В то время у служанки родился сын. Так вот она рескуя ценой своеи жизни, сохранила род. Взяв прадеда на Урал и выдаа его за своего сына. С тех самых пор он носил фамилию Александров . На самом деле мне даже жутко. Ведь с какой-то целью было небходимо искоренить род. При том всех!!! что нн было потомков.

  • @dimacosi
    @dimacosi 11 лет назад +1

    i never quite understood why Americans were collecting European art and not their own....I guess because they do not have any

    • @kosmos1957
      @kosmos1957 5 лет назад +1

      That's hilarious considering the fact that your museums are chock full of historical pieces you marched in and STOLE from other nations. Americans simply prefer to buy what they collect, rather than steal it.

    • @chiasanzes9770
      @chiasanzes9770 5 лет назад +1

      @@kosmos1957 How do you know what's in our museums? Have you ever travell in every European country I think you are not!

    • @tusher2305
      @tusher2305 2 года назад

      may be they want to buy some history as their own history is not that much fascinating,,after all they were merely slave of Britain

  • @jfposada1608
    @jfposada1608 11 лет назад

    what a ridiculous comment.

  • @shawncharton9416
    @shawncharton9416 4 года назад

    Fah-bear-zhay... not Fah-bruh-zhay

  • @georgiesinclair6951
    @georgiesinclair6951 10 лет назад +1

    what a ridiculous statement aabb katas!

  • @Nickjdj
    @Nickjdj 12 лет назад +5

    Thankyou so much for uploading! Trawled through so many 2-3min clips of this n that relating to the wonderful works of Faberge..and then i stumbled on this scholarly hour long presentation!

  • @kathiek.1035
    @kathiek.1035 5 лет назад +4

    So very beautiful ! The artistry it took to creat those eggs, and the time !! Such a wonderful video. Learned a lot too.

  • @1buman69
    @1buman69 9 лет назад +4

    The dowager empress did not walk ahead of Nicholas. As a dowager empress ranked higher than the reigning empress consort, she would enter on the arm of the emperor.

    • @BlueSwampyCraft
      @BlueSwampyCraft 8 лет назад

      Indeed. Probably he meant to say that she walked ahead of the Empress.( which is true)

    • @ludastout2852
      @ludastout2852 6 лет назад

      david busic right, and Alexis would follow

  • @pierrefireball2505
    @pierrefireball2505 3 года назад +1

    Thank you, Dr. Géza von Habsburg for your wonderful video on Fabergé beautiful objects.

  • @creature57
    @creature57 4 года назад +2

    Completely fascinating. Thank you for the upload.

  • @alisonabraham1111
    @alisonabraham1111 17 дней назад

    Should’ve mentioned Alma pihl, re, mosaic egg, but ok

  • @juz3r1
    @juz3r1 5 месяцев назад

    A fantastic performance by His Imperial and Royal Highness Archduke Geza!

  • @robbiewagnon5376
    @robbiewagnon5376 Год назад

    This photo, the posing, the period, reminds me of 1 I have seen of Frank Lloyd Wright. Interesting

  • @MichaelBaker-p7x
    @MichaelBaker-p7x 9 месяцев назад

    Have any more of the lost eggs been found or could be recreated? Mike SW Florida?

  • @newhorizon4066
    @newhorizon4066 5 лет назад +6

    Totally enthralling story teller, what I would not give to hear another lecture by Dr. Geza on the Romanovs themselves!

  • @BR-th4tb
    @BR-th4tb 4 года назад +1

    Wow, this is so so so good. Very interested in Faberge and Russian history

  • @jakshar
    @jakshar 7 лет назад +2

    thank you, great lecture

  • @XanderEwald
    @XanderEwald 3 года назад +2

    Starts talking about Putin: Your time is up.

  • @deev3282
    @deev3282 3 года назад

    Knowledgeable lecturer, but there were too many careless mistakes due to the speaker not using notes. Nobody has perfect memory, and even the greatest lecturers should use written notes. Some errors have been mentioned. Here are more: 56:31 That’s not Empress Alexandra’s sister. That’s Queen Alexandra of the UK, sister of Empress Maria Feod.
    52:26 “Faberge was not part of the exhibition” is incorrect. He should have said that Faberge items were exhibited but were not a part of the competition.
    1:01:15 error. When Edward died in 1910, it was his wife queen Alexandra, and not his daughter in law queen Mary who returned the cigarette case to Mrs. Keppel, the king’s mistress.
    10:01:39 error: Mrs Keppel did not bequeath it on her death, but presented it to Queen Mary in 1936 which was 21 years before Alice Keppel died in 1947.

  • @rhodaseptilici3816
    @rhodaseptilici3816 4 года назад

    Has the director of the museum not been told that von and van are two different things how ignorant

  • @BlueSwampyCraft
    @BlueSwampyCraft 8 лет назад

    The tiara around 23:35 isn't the one which was owned by Empress Josephine ??

  • @brandomichaelson4094
    @brandomichaelson4094 4 года назад

    Fantastic upload. Much appreciated!

  • @Jurgen_Ibro
    @Jurgen_Ibro 9 лет назад

    32:40 Hoxha's Family Collection?

  • @creativeforce11
    @creativeforce11 11 лет назад

    Fantastic, thank you