Leagues 4: Easy Butterfly Guide! 3-tick & more!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
- Simple butterfly method for Akkha, the easy 3-tick butterfly, as well as the more advanced 2.25 tick butterfly, along with the 2.42 tick and 2.66 tick butterfly!
Original Butterfly Tiles: pastebin.com/Tqiqnz4N
Tile markers with extra red tiles: pastebin.com/TGz2yiUz
0:00 Intro
0:16 3-tick Butterfly Setting up
0:53 3-tick Butterfly method
1:24 2.25 tick sweaty method
2:30 Helpful tiles to mark
2:44 2.42 tick butterfly
3:06 Dealing with shadow akkhas
3:35 2.66 tick butterfly
3:51 Ending
Music:
OSRS Soundtrack 
Игры
Oh just realized as I was about to sleep and wake up in a few hours for day 1 of leagues, an easy way to avoid the dps check while 3-tick shadowing and briefly stepping into the other quadrant, is to do what's shown in this clip I just recorded streamable.com/ulouum that way you never step into the other quadrant and don't need to waste ticks like I showed in the guide. Wish I thought of this sooner but gotta get some sleep before the long 1st day of leagues lol.
Lol go to sleep
No doubt you're gonna bless us with some more insane techs this leagues
if anyone in the clan knows how to do this, theyll become the most based raider out of anyone. maybe even cooler than the executioners
Edit: I updated the tiles with a better starting tile. The start tile (1) is different from what's shown in the video, but it's much better for setting up on after Simon Says attack and during a shadow transition. When swapping sides, run to tile 1 or 2 and start the cycle from there.
Ok, for anyone who really just wants a specific set of tiles to stand on, I've set up colour coded tiles for the 2.25t (aka 18/8 for 8 attacks every 18 ticks) and for the 2.42t method (this is 17/7 because you skip 1 attack).
These are colour coded (grey for NE, yellow for SE, cyan for SW and red for NW) and numbered 1-8. If Akkha is
could you possibly make a quick video of how you would use the tiles for us visual learners? Would bne highly appreciated
@@showutoo yep certainly. Been thinking about doing that. Actually I use Aaty's tiles which are even better than these ones (they're 2.22t aka 20/9)
@Zxv975 you'd be a hero if you could either show it by video or send a clip of aaty using it. I'm at a limited schedule right now so any help would be insanely appreciated
@@showutoo Just put out a video on the method mate, hope it helps!
Now this is tech I can get into. Some funky shit
Will you be going magic relic this League Kirby?
Ur the goat😊
So if 5t anients becomes 2t. Do i still need to manual cast ancients to three tick.
I'm not 100% sure on what makes autocasting bad per se, so i may be wrong. But i thought it added 1t before the first attack. So if it goes from 2 to 3t and the cycle is 3t that should be okay right?
you'd be able to do 3 tick methods, but you're now spending 50% more time between attacks
no because you'll be standing still and akkha wil reach you
Nobody answered your question super well, so I'll try to explain a bit better. Tick 1, you're moving. Tick 2, you're moving. Tick 3, if you try to auto cast, you'll be standing there doing nothing, and the attack will happen on tick 4 (6,8,10, etc). If you manually cast, use a powered staff, or any other combat style, your first attack will be on tick 3. So you're free to move again on tick 4.
@@Undefined14 yeah i posted this before the league. Since then i had some experience with it all.
I guess what initially confused me is how this would be different from a regular 3t attack but I hadn't considered the part where you are forced to stand still.
@@Undefined14 "no because you'll be standing still and akkha wil reach you" explains this pretty simply without a mountain of text for nothing...
most people are aware autocast has a 1 tick delay which is most likely why he explicitly asked about autocasting lol
This looks sick. Can you post some cool tech for melee weapons so I don't feel left out by picking it lol
If I find any lol
Nice, what about 1 tic butterfly...?
My thoughts too
Can’t attack and move on the same tick in osrs. Interestingly I’ve heard of private servers where you can though
@@eponym7783Not true. Woox walking is an example. If you've clicked to attack, and you're not in range, you'll attack on the tick you arrive in range. So if you can get in range in one tick, you move and attack in the same tick.
@@Undefined14 only seen your comment now but yea this is something that occurred to me as well. i figured being out of range within 'same tick' distance (ie 1 or 2 tiles when running) is the only way it's possible, which still means there's no way to 1t bf or the like
If we're getting this complex with the cycles then I feel like the notation can be altered. I'd rather use something such as:
18/8 for 2.25t
17/7 for 2.42t
16/6 for 2.66t
This seems a lot clearer to me. The decimals don't give information for the whole cycle whereas the unsimplified fractions do. 5.33t Xarpus would also be 16/3, where you're attacking 3 times every 16 ticks (every 4 Xarpus turns).
The advantage of the current notation is that it makes comparing relative DPS of the methods easier though, so both have their merits.
I first assumed that 2.42 was a rounding of 2.41666, I assumed the .41666 part came from 1/2.4
I was really confused by that idea - so yeah I think better notation would be great to avoid future nerds some pain
Yeah this is why I'm a dumb melee boi. Me smash.
Wtf do u mean 2.42 tick
Zulrah or Csgo2
"Easy".
This is why I suck at PVM, I guess.
Who does and why do you enjoy this stuff?
Every time they put out more content like this, the closer I am to quitting
2.25, 2.42, 2.46, 2.fuckingSweaty. Also, adding decimal places to the methods adds nothing.
Wym it adds nothing, it describes attach speed. If you were to have a weapon that alternated a 2t with a 3t speed, you’d effectively be on a 2.5t cycle, for example. Also see stuff like 1.5t teaks. It’s a 3t cycle where every cut is a double roll, hence 1.5t
@@eponym7783 sure, 1.5 actually make sense it's a a tick and a half. however ,when you get into the hundredths decimal place it's just a bit ridiculous lol.
@@steven_himself i get that it looks confusing but the math and idea are the same