Removing the Remjet layer from cinema film

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
  • I show the method that I (and many others) use for removing the remjet layer from cinema film when exposing it in stills-cameras and self-developing. The ratio mentioned is 15 grams per 400-500mL
    ►My other videos relating to cinema film:
    Bulk Loading - • Bulk loading film to s...
    C41 vs ECN2 vs Cinestill - • Cinestill 800T Alterna...
    Scanning with a camera- • Batch Scanning Film wi...
    Converting 500T with NLP - • Negative Lab Pro v2.3 ...
    ►Negative Lab Pro Free Trial - gumroad.com/a/307123315
    ►The Essential Film Holder - clifforth.co.uk/EXA/
    ►Buy Me a Coffee- www.buymeacoffee.com/pushingfilm
    ►Merch Shop - pushingfilm.myspreadshop.com
    ►My Zine - www.exaframe.com/product/sund...
    ►Follow Pushing Film on Socials @pushingfilm
    ►Join the Pushing Film Discord Server - / discord
    Arista C-41 developing kit - amzn.to/38ckX7u
    Sous Vide I use for temp control - amzn.to/3jUGRz3
    Developing tank I use - amzn.to/36xlFvK
    Nitrile Gloves - amzn.to/3xF98l1
    Using the above Amazon affiliate links to make any purchases allows us to earn from qualifying purchases; which is a much-appreciated way to support the channel without costing you any more!
    I purchased my Kodak Vision 100ft roll from Photo Warehouse - www.ultrafineonline.com/moko5...
    ►All music via Artlist.io
    Get 2 extra months free when you join Artlist using our referral link!
    bit.ly/2vNloCi
    ►Get 10% off on all Pixpa plans for your Website using our link-
    bit.ly/3UTof2e
    Video Chapter Markers:
    00:00 - Intro
    00:41 - What is Remjet?
    01:03 - Removal Concept
    02:12 - The Procedure
    05:30 - Conclusion
    #remjet #cinemafilm #35mmfilm
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 83

  • @dalehammond1749
    @dalehammond1749 Год назад +13

    Wish I had seen a video like this 12 years ago. I started developing old exposed film and struggled with my film always coming out back with no images (so I thought). After throwing away many rolls of 8mm film, I noted what looked like an image in between black mud. I wondered if that stuff would wash off so I held the film under running water in my bathroom sink and rubbed the film with my fingers. I discovered the entire film had images! I had never heard of remjet at the time and never saw any video on it. I was both thrilled and ticked off for all the film I threw away. Great video, thanks

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  Год назад +3

      Oh man, what a shame! Good that you eventually made the discovery though.

    • @wildechap
      @wildechap 6 месяцев назад

      damn

  • @AlexOnStreets
    @AlexOnStreets 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for this! I will seriously consider this for the near future.

  • @jeffkilgo2143
    @jeffkilgo2143 11 месяцев назад +1

    Simple and straightforward...thanks. I'm going to give your method a go. Joined.

  • @MakerofThingss
    @MakerofThingss 2 года назад

    Wow! So easy! Thanks!!

  • @poniatowski3547
    @poniatowski3547 2 года назад +2

    Great video Hashem. I also c41 process Vision 3 film - I prefer the look to ECN2 developed stock. I was going to use baking soda to remove the remjet but picked up a packet of Melbourne Film Supply remjet remover when i purchased a Cinestill 2 bath simplified c41 powder kit from them. Added cost was only $10 bucks for a packet of 2 and I have found each packet lasts one set of c41 chems. so $5 over 18ish rolls. That stuff is quite quick, works at 27 deg C and is a 10sec agitation and then 4 or 5 rinses in dev temp water. That's just what i use and no one way is necessarily better than another as you say. Whatever people use is cool as long as you find it the best fit for you. Needless to say people shouldn't be scared of remjet. It's very easy to remove.

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад

      That's good! Yeah I might eventually try some of that stuff from MFS :-)

  • @RYANPARKPHOTOGRAPHY
    @RYANPARKPHOTOGRAPHY 2 года назад

    wow! thanks for the video. I am going to develop my color films myself soon this year and I really wanna try cine film as well! thanks for the video again!

  • @camerafusion
    @camerafusion 2 года назад

    Awesome, Thank you!

  • @tuckk123
    @tuckk123 Год назад

    Thanks for this, worked like a dream!

  • @anthonys_expired_film
    @anthonys_expired_film Год назад +3

    Thanks for this video! I’ve seen other remjet removal videos where they use washing soda instead of baking soda. Probably very similar substances as long as it makes the water alkaline. One question: would the remjet removal work after development is done, rather than at the start of the process as you show? Just wondering. Thanks! Cheers from USA.

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  Год назад

      Yeah if you can find washing soda just as easily, that is a bit more alkaline so would be slightly better! I have heard that removing it after can work fine, but have never tried it myself.

  • @fluxloewe
    @fluxloewe Год назад

    Great Video, Thanks! 🙏

  • @Monologjournals
    @Monologjournals 2 года назад

    Thanks for the vid! Looking into developing my own kodak vision someday and this is really helpful. I noticed your copy stand in the background, may I ask what brand it is? (I believe you used tripod earlier)

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад +1

      No probs! Yeah that's the new Negative Supply mini riser, I received it a few days ago and should be making a video soon 🙂

    • @Monologjournals
      @Monologjournals 2 года назад +1

      @@pushingfilm cool, look forward seeing it!

  • @erichstocker8358
    @erichstocker8358 9 месяцев назад

    Sorry I meant that add a question. Does vision 3 even need stabilizer step? My understanding is that new color films usually don't need stabilization?

  • @pancakelens75
    @pancakelens75 Год назад +2

    Wonderfully helpful video!🙏🏼My question is: after removal of the majority of the remjet during pre-rinse, is there a risk that any of the residual remjet would ruin your c41n chems during development?

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  Год назад +2

      I've never experienced this! I think small residual amounts don't cause much harm since it's just carbon. If you're worried, you can run it through a coffee filter paper. I tried this, but it didn't really seem to remove any sediment or change performance for subsequent use compared to not filtering it. I'm not 100% confident on these opinions though, so it would be good to ask a few people including lab operators if possible.

    • @pancakelens75
      @pancakelens75 Год назад

      @@pushingfilm ok great, thanks for the response!🙏

  • @onkarphull
    @onkarphull 2 года назад +5

    Awesome video! When developing in C41 chemicals what temperature do you keep the developer at? I am going to switch from using ECN2 chemicals which need the developer at 41 Degrees C and was wondering if you still use the C41 temperature of 38 Degrees C?
    Also, an additional method I use to remove any residual remjet before the stabiliser, (instead of the rinse under the tap at the end) is to hang the film up wet and use a wet sponge to run down the the film’s remjet side (rinsing the sponge after every pass) and for the final few passes I use cotton pads and discard them once they are used. I’ve found this to be the quickest, cleanest and best way to avoid scratching the film.

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад +1

      Thanks! I currently use Tetenal C41 at 38 degrees 🙂

  • @frank21cn1
    @frank21cn1 2 года назад +1

    Very relevant question: Where is the best place to get cinefilm and have them properly developed and scanned here in Melbourne?

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад

      I would say B2 darkroom is the only one I know of providing it as a service here.

  • @erichstocker8358
    @erichstocker8358 9 месяцев назад

    I have looked at the video several times. It is as you indicate fairly straightforward. But I notice after the hand rinsing, you have put the film back on the reel and then tank for the stabilizer/photoflow step. I have never had much luck getting wet film back on plastic reels. Do you have some sort of technique for that? I could see metal reels (which I no longer have) but plastic?

    • @mbenavides
      @mbenavides 2 месяца назад +1

      Respool the film on the reel underwater... it easier.

  • @doriangasseling
    @doriangasseling 8 дней назад

    Digging up some old stuff here haha. Got my hands on .. shit, probably, 3000ft of 50D/250D/500T short ends locally. Will be using this technique. Thanks from across the ditch!

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  8 дней назад

      Nice one! Glad this could be helpful

  • @jameslenney
    @jameslenney 6 месяцев назад +1

    Amazingly helpful. So unless I’ve misunderstood, you’d do your shoot as normal, then remove the remjet? And not the other way around?

  • @franciscoalvaradomenares1611
    @franciscoalvaradomenares1611 9 месяцев назад

    Wow man !!! 🤝🤝🤝, you are the Man !!thank !!!!

  • @Supertomiman
    @Supertomiman 5 месяцев назад +1

    Baking soda is fine. I don't understand the obsession some people have with making the cost saving measures not even worth it by buying unnecessary shit. Like stop baths and wetting agents. I just use cheap white vinegar and distilled water and it works perfect.

  • @nikolasdove
    @nikolasdove 2 года назад +10

    Is there a safe way to remove the remjet layer before shooting, reroll the film and then shoot it as if you were making your own homemade Cinestill stock? I just saw your bulk loading video and thought it would be interesting if that kind of process would be possible at home?

    • @jamesharber6086
      @jamesharber6086 2 года назад +4

      I reckon so, but the problem is you'd have to make sure that ALL of the remjet was off, otherwise if any is left then you'd ruin the C41 chems. You'd also have to do it alll in the dark, including scrubbing, drying, and loading. Loading is ok but you'd need to be pretty damn good to do the whole process in the dark.

    • @willworkfor_film
      @willworkfor_film Год назад +1

      @@jamesharber6086 can you look at undeveloped film in the dark with night-vision goggles? Assuming you can make it light tight around your eyes. Essentially, will IR light effect the film at all?

    • @CymbalsOnly
      @CymbalsOnly Год назад

      I’m really not sure why one would want to do it before shooting, when doing it after is incredibly simple. Doing it before shooting is a bit of a hassle.

    • @conorw999
      @conorw999 Год назад +1

      @@willworkfor_film That depends on the film and its sensitivity. I have found Kodak Gold to not be IR sensitive in tests with IR lights, but I haven’t had the chance to deal with undeveloped film under NODs yet

    • @willworkfor_film
      @willworkfor_film Год назад

      @@conorw999 yeah I was just wondering cause then you could develop film in the dark without being mostly blind. But you'd also have to make sure the eye holes are light tight.

  • @jamesharber6086
    @jamesharber6086 2 года назад

    Awesome advice! I however find that even after baking soda and washing at the end, there still is remjet left which shows up in scanning?

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад +1

      I see! Are you doing both rinses at high temps, and letting the first round soak for a bit before agitating vigorously?

    • @jamesharber6086
      @jamesharber6086 2 года назад +1

      @@pushingfilm I think I might need to try again and leave it a bit longer. I saw that someone also recommended using a mixture of fairy liquid in the final wash to get it all off by hand?

  • @AlexDoesYouTubes
    @AlexDoesYouTubes Месяц назад

    This was all I needed to pull the trigger on a 100' roll of Kodak 5207.

  • @afndcasd1288
    @afndcasd1288 5 месяцев назад

    which scanner do you use btw? love your channel!!

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  5 месяцев назад

      Thank you! I use my digital camera, and have some videos about that process :-)

  • @shawnlowe896
    @shawnlowe896 2 года назад

    Legend!

  • @Viper8930
    @Viper8930 10 месяцев назад +1

    Can you do this before you bulk load the film? i.e in a dark bag you remove the remjet on the 100ft or 400ft roll of film then once it's dry you can put it in the bulk loader

    • @AlexDoesYouTubes
      @AlexDoesYouTubes Месяц назад

      I would imagine it's possible, since that's what Cinestill does, but I'm guessing without specialized equipment, it would be difficult to the point of not being worth it.

  • @themoolag
    @themoolag Год назад

    Does that leftover remjet ruin chemicals? I bought a hand rolled vision 200t, remjet removed. Got it developed at my locals spot and some frames had little "watermarks" . I was wondering if that was leftover remjet and if i just contaminated my photolab's chemicals

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  Год назад

      It has never done so in my experience. Remaining remjet on the film doesn't show up as watermarks per say, but rather as hard spots of white that show in your scans (on negative film, since the remjet is black)

  • @dabsond
    @dabsond 2 года назад

    Are you putting the film back on reels for the finishing step? How are you getting the wet film back on wet reels?

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад

      Sometimes I do ( In which case I just do it slowly and carefully. It's annoying, but it works) and at other times I cant be bothered and just run the stabiliser over the film in the bucket and snake the film around 😅 Loading wet/swollen film onto reels can also result in the ball bearing stripping bits of the emulsion off from the edges/sprockets. So, I guess I that neither is a perfect solution for that part of the process!

  • @brian-emo
    @brian-emo Год назад +1

    Will this have the look and halations of Cinestill, or is that from shooting with the washed film first and not just from washing the rem-jet off in developing?

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  Год назад +1

      It won't have the halations of Cinestill! This is the case with any cinema film exposed with a remjet layer. I have another video comparing Cinestill vs the original 500T etc where you can see the difference.

    • @brian-emo
      @brian-emo Год назад

      @@pushingfilm thank you!! All your videos have been super helpful, haven’t found many that go into this much detail about using vision3 :)

  • @throwingstones96
    @throwingstones96 2 года назад +1

    any tips on getting remjet off the emulsion side of the film?
    After developing when trying the rinse off the remaining remjet I sometimes smear some on the emulsion side
    wondering if you had the same problem?

    • @helloimnotwell
      @helloimnotwell Год назад

      I have this problem too I keep getting remjet stains on my emulsion side I don’t know how to prevent it

    • @throwingstones96
      @throwingstones96 Год назад

      @@helloimnotwell Now I just remove it in running water one frame at a time with my fingers with some latex gloves while pulling the film out of the reel
      Key is to keep the roll inside the developing reel holder while doing this

    • @helloimnotwell
      @helloimnotwell Год назад

      @@throwingstones96 I'll try this next time, thanks!

  • @gabrielsilvaz4199
    @gabrielsilvaz4199 22 дня назад

    It’s sodium sulfate, borax, and sodium hydroxide and it’s way better and cheaper to mix. Then sodium bicarbonate. Kodak pre-bath is the way to go definitely nothing can compare! Also no wiping necessary. It only takes 10 seconds and it comes off like magic. It might sound cheaper to buy baking soda and I guess it is at first, but the initial total cost comes out to be way cheaper to do it the Kodak formula! Plus, it’s reusable the pH level is around 9.8 to 9.9 with Kodak formula

  • @user-ux5hp6vp2t
    @user-ux5hp6vp2t 2 года назад

    You crossprocess vision 3 in c41?
    Does ecn2 give better results?

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад

      Whether it's better is down to preference (especially since much more difference can be made with scanning) but, ECN-2 developer will generally give a flatter/darker image.

  • @sebvz89
    @sebvz89 Год назад +1

    hi! this works for fuji cinema film too? regards from Chile!

  • @Performak_YT
    @Performak_YT Год назад

    Is there a way to remove the remjet from negatives to recover the pictures? Thanks!

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  Год назад

      Hey, I'm not sure what you mean specifically. You have little spots of remjet remaining?

    • @Performak_YT
      @Performak_YT Год назад

      @@pushingfilm A lot haha. But I already "washed it" and recovered the pictures (only 9 pictures were visible, now all of them)

  • @LS-cs9rq
    @LS-cs9rq 11 месяцев назад

    Is that safe to flush down the sink or needs special treatment for the environment?

  • @didiMao
    @didiMao 2 года назад

    Key tool for this process @ 2:40. That asian soup spoon is REQUIRED!

  • @mariob1060
    @mariob1060 17 дней назад

    so after removing the remjet with soda I can bring my film to photo studio

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  13 дней назад

      No, once the film is wet and heated up from remjet removal, you should process yourself immediately.

  • @skaramicke
    @skaramicke 2 года назад

    Wait, so you remove the rem jet layer after exposing the film? Is the rem jet layer in the way of the development chemicals?
    I was under the impression that you’d remove the rem jet first, load the film canisters, expose the photos and then develop as normal.

    • @toggjones5412
      @toggjones5412 2 года назад +5

      Nope, Cinestill does that to be able to sell it ready to develop, but removing it prior to shooting is what causes halations and makes it more prone to static and other artifact. As long as it is removed prior to C41 development you're fine

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  2 года назад

      That's right, as per the previous comment! In fact, you can even remove it all at the rinse stage after development and blix and it'll still work... but I prefer to do most of it beforehand.

  • @ZachACameraGuy
    @ZachACameraGuy 7 месяцев назад

    if you guys are as cheap as i am, here's my solution:
    mixing the "remjet remover": 30g of baking soda/ 500mL tap water at any tempreture (as long as baking soda can desolve). solution will be clear before any use.
    removing remjet:
    1. pour room tempreture remjet remover into the development tank, let it sit still for 2 minutes.
    2. pour the remjet remover into a bottle to reuse, the solution will turn pink and get progressively more pink with each reuse, but almost no remjet will come out with it at this step.
    3. pour room tempreture tap water into the development tank, shake aggressively for a few seconds, pour out. You should see the "black water" at this step.
    4. Rinse again, the water should come out with a pink tint. rinse a few more times until the water become almost clear, and your film is ready for normal C41 process.
    Note:
    >this method will not remove 100% of the remjet. after the development you can scrub the film under runing water, gentally, with your finger to remove any remaining remjet.
    >you can almost reuse the remjet remover indefinitely
    >"room tempreture" is anywhere between 15-30 degrees celsius.
    >you can rinse with tap water at around 30 degrees celsius to get clear of the "pink water" faster, but it's not necessary and from my experience with hundreds of rolls, makes no noticable different.

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  7 месяцев назад +1

      Hey, good tip! I've never thought to re-use the solution or do it this way. Gonna try it next time, thanks 🙂

    • @ZachACameraGuy
      @ZachACameraGuy 7 месяцев назад

      @@pushingfilm baking soda is dirt cheap comparing to C41 chemicals but still, I'm cheaper 🤣🤣

    • @pushingfilm
      @pushingfilm  7 месяцев назад +1

      @@ZachACameraGuy Haha same, you gotta save where you can!

  • @wlewisiii
    @wlewisiii 7 месяцев назад

    Cinema film - Just Say No. Big no. Hell no even. It's ugly & it ruins chemicals.
    Spend the money for decent film instead.