We're so glad you enjoyed the content! More Data Literacy videos are on the way. Tune in Tuesdays and if you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to our channel for new videos on a regular basis: ruclips.net/user/asu.
One thing this video didn’t cover is that most companies’ privacy policies provide users with no or very limited choice in what data is being collected or how it is used; it’s either accept that they will use your data as they wish (to the maximum extent allowed by law) or you can’t use their services at all. There may be a few cases where competing companies can offer better data privacy, but in most cases the competition all have the same privacy policy or there may be no viable competition at all. It’s up to the public to pressure their legislators into strengthening privacy laws.
If selective data is obtained through a secondary person(s), not targeted directly, via unique devices, services and networks. Would the hypothetical victim be lawfully entitled to a form of compensation? Since these data breaches has not only breached various companies terms and conditions, along with actual laws in place, not solely limited to internet?
Glad you found it valuable. 🤓 New Data Literacy videos are published every Thursday. You can subscribe to our channel for updates: ruclips.net/user/asu
>Data privacy >Sponsored by Google It's not surprising that this video does a pretty poor job of explaining privacy. You cannot talk about privacy without talking about free and open source software. Because that's the only way you can be sure that your privacy is being respected. They do not mention the patriot act. And they do not give you the only _true_ solution to privacy which is self hosting. But again what can you expect from people who make all their money from google.
Wanna share 11 minutes video which does the job better? (: Free/open software still had licensing, restrictions and terms of service. No one ever has read all the source codes of software they used, so being sure in "privacy bring respected" is impossible. I'm not USA citizen, why do I care about patriot act? Self hosting, you mean, creating own internet?) Anything else would require you to give up privacy. And well, you the great fighter for the privacy, how much money did you put into rising the attention to data privacy?)
@@VladislavDerbenev no one has ever read all the source code. But a lot of people have each seen a small portion of it. All you need is to find that one piece of code that collects data (when ubuntu started sending data to amazon it was discovered in less than a month). You say that respecting privacy is impossible. Have you heard of the GNU project? Pretty much everything they've made is 100% privacy respecting. Also regarding the licensing, it is possible to read everything if the license used is a free license (e.g BSD, GPLv2, GPLv3, LGPL, etc) and the GPL, which _is_ a restrictive license, only restricts the user to use the source code to create proprietary software using it. You should care about the patriot act because a similar thing could potentially be past in your country. Whether you like it or not the US is the most influential country in the world and that has both good and bad consequences. I'm not saying that I have done a particularly good job of raising attention to privacy. All I'm saying is that the study hall team has clearly done a bad job of it. You also said that I should go find an 11 minute video that does the job better. The same way that you can't explain calculus to a layman in one lecture you can't explain privacy in an 11 minute video. All the good videos are at least 20mins long and the more detailed ones are all nearly an hour long. Don't forget that this was still the study hall team's decision to make a short video about this. All the blame still falls on them.
@@hexa3389 there should be better term than just "open source" for your explanation then, because "open source" doesn't mean it doesn't track you or respect your privacy in any way, absolute most users can't be sure what does their software do even if it's open source, they will have to put their trust in other people expertise. I can't think of any real life application in modern system which doesn't include closed software, e.g. many drivers on ubuntu systems. There's no foreseeable future where open source can replace closed software in market or common user needs. This video is the longest in their data literacy course so far, out of all 10. They seems to attempt to have 10 minutes long videos, it is not good or bad, it's format and budget. It's shared freely for anyone and rises a lot of important issues. Your arbitrary limits for "shortness, goodness and details" are meaningless. I've studied information security for 8 years in university, I still know only that I don't know shit unless I put 1000 hours more in extremely short area. Possibly, if you evaluate the video with consideration of the length, you will understand that just because it doesn't include something, doesn't mean it's bad. Otherwise, any material you will suggest I will evaluate as bad, because I will find something missing in it
@@VladislavDerbenev there's a better term for "open source". Its called FOSS (Free and open source software) which is the term I was using. You say that this video does a pretty good job with the amount of time it's got. And I'll give you that. But it doesn't matter if you make the most information dense video about something if you don't talk about all of said something. Especially if you market it as something that will give a general overview. And yes general overview, I'm not saying go explain every small detail. The problem is that this video doesn't give a complete overview.
@@hexa3389 again, anyone can publish free and open source program which will track you more than do something else. Just being FOSS doesn't mean it's follows data privacy, and in real world, it will still communicate to other closed software which you don't have any control of.
Can a government has access to private data of foreigners collected by national companies if the data was collected outside its borders? China, USA And how can this countries use it fairly or unfairly?
When you said, "OK, Google" at the 5 minute mark, my phone responded to your voice! Case in point!
Absolutely necessary pieces of information everyone needs to know
We're so glad you enjoyed the content! More Data Literacy videos are on the way. Tune in Tuesdays and if you haven't already, be sure to subscribe to our channel for new videos on a regular basis: ruclips.net/user/asu.
Data privacy sponsored by Google?
*WoW!*
One thing this video didn’t cover is that most companies’ privacy policies provide users with no or very limited choice in what data is being collected or how it is used; it’s either accept that they will use your data as they wish (to the maximum extent allowed by law) or you can’t use their services at all. There may be a few cases where competing companies can offer better data privacy, but in most cases the competition all have the same privacy policy or there may be no viable competition at all. It’s up to the public to pressure their legislators into strengthening privacy laws.
6:10 am I the only one who tried to move that mouse cursor thinking it was mine?! 🤣
If selective data is obtained through a secondary person(s), not targeted directly, via unique devices, services and networks. Would the hypothetical victim be lawfully entitled to a form of compensation? Since these data breaches has not only breached various companies terms and conditions, along with actual laws in place, not solely limited to internet?
Thanks for making the video
Glad you found it valuable. 🤓 New Data Literacy videos are published every Thursday. You can subscribe to our channel for updates: ruclips.net/user/asu
>Data privacy
>Sponsored by Google
It's not surprising that this video does a pretty poor job of explaining privacy. You cannot talk about privacy without talking about free and open source software. Because that's the only way you can be sure that your privacy is being respected. They do not mention the patriot act. And they do not give you the only _true_ solution to privacy which is self hosting. But again what can you expect from people who make all their money from google.
Wanna share 11 minutes video which does the job better? (:
Free/open software still had licensing, restrictions and terms of service. No one ever has read all the source codes of software they used, so being sure in "privacy bring respected" is impossible. I'm not USA citizen, why do I care about patriot act? Self hosting, you mean, creating own internet?) Anything else would require you to give up privacy. And well, you the great fighter for the privacy, how much money did you put into rising the attention to data privacy?)
@@VladislavDerbenev no one has ever read all the source code. But a lot of people have each seen a small portion of it. All you need is to find that one piece of code that collects data (when ubuntu started sending data to amazon it was discovered in less than a month). You say that respecting privacy is impossible. Have you heard of the GNU project? Pretty much everything they've made is 100% privacy respecting. Also regarding the licensing, it is possible to read everything if the license used is a free license (e.g BSD, GPLv2, GPLv3, LGPL, etc) and the GPL, which _is_ a restrictive license, only restricts the user to use the source code to create proprietary software using it.
You should care about the patriot act because a similar thing could potentially be past in your country. Whether you like it or not the US is the most influential country in the world and that has both good and bad consequences.
I'm not saying that I have done a particularly good job of raising attention to privacy. All I'm saying is that the study hall team has clearly done a bad job of it.
You also said that I should go find an 11 minute video that does the job better. The same way that you can't explain calculus to a layman in one lecture you can't explain privacy in an 11 minute video. All the good videos are at least 20mins long and the more detailed ones are all nearly an hour long. Don't forget that this was still the study hall team's decision to make a short video about this. All the blame still falls on them.
@@hexa3389 there should be better term than just "open source" for your explanation then, because "open source" doesn't mean it doesn't track you or respect your privacy in any way, absolute most users can't be sure what does their software do even if it's open source, they will have to put their trust in other people expertise. I can't think of any real life application in modern system which doesn't include closed software, e.g. many drivers on ubuntu systems. There's no foreseeable future where open source can replace closed software in market or common user needs.
This video is the longest in their data literacy course so far, out of all 10. They seems to attempt to have 10 minutes long videos, it is not good or bad, it's format and budget. It's shared freely for anyone and rises a lot of important issues. Your arbitrary limits for "shortness, goodness and details" are meaningless. I've studied information security for 8 years in university, I still know only that I don't know shit unless I put 1000 hours more in extremely short area. Possibly, if you evaluate the video with consideration of the length, you will understand that just because it doesn't include something, doesn't mean it's bad. Otherwise, any material you will suggest I will evaluate as bad, because I will find something missing in it
@@VladislavDerbenev there's a better term for "open source". Its called FOSS (Free and open source software) which is the term I was using.
You say that this video does a pretty good job with the amount of time it's got. And I'll give you that. But it doesn't matter if you make the most information dense video about something if you don't talk about all of said something. Especially if you market it as something that will give a general overview. And yes general overview, I'm not saying go explain every small detail. The problem is that this video doesn't give a complete overview.
@@hexa3389 again, anyone can publish free and open source program which will track you more than do something else. Just being FOSS doesn't mean it's follows data privacy, and in real world, it will still communicate to other closed software which you don't have any control of.
Can a government has access to private data of foreigners collected by national companies if the data was collected outside its borders?
China, USA
And how can this countries use it fairly or unfairly?
Sponsored by Google. Hey siri
People getting triggered by Google sponsorship on Google's RUclips XD you'd better close it fast, it tracks the data you agreed by tos!
*Sponsored by Google*
😂😂 ok