high quality content as always and a really interesting insight - funny how connected everything is, which has to do with fluid movements. last week I bought "the forehand solution" and eager to read it over christmas. one thing that bothers me here is that I loosen up the angle between my hand and my underarm, when I begin to swing forward which results in a very low position of the racquet almost independently of the backswing height. maybe I should keep the angle between hand and underarm more stable, in an upright position?
I don't know if I agree with your description of Medvedev's swing. Med has a WTA swing and he really takes a big loopy swing. It's nothing like the ATP swing. It is flatter like the WTA swing. If you like at it carefully, his racket starts as high or higher than Nadal's, and finishes very swallow, so wouldn't use his swing to prove your point. I don't know if any player other than Nadal's has balance angles. Look at Fed's or Alcaraz's swing, theirs starts high but ends very swallow. No balance there. And most ATP players copy Fed's swing.
Hi. Thanks for the reply. Look more closely at the content. I'm not referring to the high take back position. Almost every player does this and it has no relevance to the angle of the racket drop. But, let's take Federer as an example. He lowers the racket. And then releases the wrist. It's the release point and the racket drop that have a relationship. Does that make more sense?
kdp.amazon.com/amazon-dp-action/us/dualbookshelf.marketplacelink/B0C8XFB3R7h check out our books on Amazon
Awesome. Thank you
First today for such a wonderful and sweeping teaching! Love the analogy with the mechanics of drumming the rhythm. Many thanks. 🎯
Always Great information Thank You Sir!
Indeed it is similar to a pendulum = simetrical amplitude, but here observed horizontally as in the shadow in red color
Great video
Thank you.
high quality content as always and a really interesting insight - funny how connected everything is, which has to do with fluid movements.
last week I bought "the forehand solution" and eager to read it over christmas.
one thing that bothers me here is that I loosen up the angle between my hand and my underarm, when I begin to swing forward which results in a very low position of the racquet almost independently of the backswing height.
maybe I should keep the angle between hand and underarm more stable, in an upright position?
Thanks
You have holiday in Thailand? Wish you have a happy time.
I am coaching here. But it's a beautiful place
@oneminutetennis Wow, I live in Bangkok , this time of the year PM2.5 is high dont forget checking it before playing.
I'm only here for a few weeks. So it'll be fine. I'm just up the road in huahin
I don't know if I agree with your description of Medvedev's swing. Med has a WTA swing and he really takes a big loopy swing. It's nothing like the ATP swing. It is flatter like the WTA swing. If you like at it carefully, his racket starts as high or higher than Nadal's, and finishes very swallow, so wouldn't use his swing to prove your point. I don't know if any player other than Nadal's has balance angles. Look at Fed's or Alcaraz's swing, theirs starts high but ends very swallow. No balance there. And most ATP players copy Fed's swing.
Hi. Thanks for the reply.
Look more closely at the content.
I'm not referring to the high take back position.
Almost every player does this and it has no relevance to the angle of the racket drop.
But, let's take Federer as an example.
He lowers the racket. And then releases the wrist.
It's the release point and the racket drop that have a relationship.
Does that make more sense?