Look it up "PSYOPS". This is what the UK and USA live under. When the populations realise this, then trust me, they will not be happy and have every right to stand up and collapse these brainwashing and dangerous Governments and their propaganda machines, called the media.
I had to shake my head when the host said that england could guarantee ukraine's security by putting troops on the ground. That comment shows ignorance at so many levels It does make me question the competency of his cerebral cortex.
One has to wonder about yours, or maybe it's your intentions. That is not what he said, he asked the guest guaranteeing Ukrainian security with 'what amounts to' British military capacity - he was talking about the wider support of NATO if Ukraine was brought into the alliance as part of a settlement.
@Ode-to-Odysseus I am sure the united states wanted to sell oil to europe And promised to get rid of the nordstream two pipeline. Mission accomplished.
@Ode-to-Odysseus There are no nations that would follow. Giving money is easy, especially when you can print it out of thin air. Sending your young men is entirely different. Besides the west is out of ammunition.
They are losing slowly, not big time. With enough weapons and ammunition Ukraine could keep Russia at bay for many years. With a massive increase in air power they could turn the tide.
@hymns4ever197 so why are they pulling people off the street? Why are they even taking down syndrome people off to go and fight? You clearly have no idea whats actually happening.
it's more aerial defense from what i understand. also, they need to unfukk their military budgets and not have it outsourced. management needs to be done by ACTUAL military folks, and a list of what's working and what isn't, and what's needed to get up to par. it's been left to a dismal state because of all this.money mismanaged. i really hope they can get around the politicians that thought that was a good idea. and get people who know what they are doing to be top of this instead of friggin outsourcing. trust your military's assessment of whether they have what they need. ffs.
@@ragingmonk6080 You're the only person I've heard say Britain needs America for defence. And what made you think i couldn't read your comment? Surely the fact i replied to it, could only mean i read it. Is English your first language?
It's time to be realistic... Ukraine has fought heroically, but no sane person thought they could defeat Russia. She should have said time to be honest for once.
the UK was already guaranteeing for Ukraine after they gave up their nuclear weapons, it seems that those promises and guarantees are simply useless and appeasement never works.
zelinsky has made mention of the fact they believed in others, gave up the nuk3s and now they are unprotected against this invasion. IF we have people give up protections and don't protect them... this sort of agreement around the world can potentially fall apart. they will rearm themselves if "guarantees" mean nothing.
If I came to the defence of someone facing an unprovoked and frenzied attack from a madman, in what way would that be an escalation? Those who say it is, please explain.
British troops deployed officially would be viewed as direct NATO intervention and hit hard, regardless of Zelenskys latest cap in hand trip to Brussels.
Not all that much oil/gas in Donbas. If that was true Russia would have done a lot more in Syria to prevent Kuwait pipeline to reach Europe through Syria. Poor argument.
No think of the headlines for Heappey he may even get a place in the bunker for it. Lots of lovely media uproar and looking tough and important marvellous scrap book additions.
This is the equivalent of NATO; a female friend is pounding on your door, telling you that brutal attackers are trying to dominate her. Your reply is that she must defeat the overwhelming strength of her attackers first and then you will debate opening the door or not. You will also give one of her attackers a veto vote in that discussion. That is the equivalent response that NATO countries are presenting to Ukraine. I say if you don't open the door now and help her win, the attackers will be back for one of you. The attackers must never win.
NATO continued to honey trap the weak timid mans girlfriends one after the other by throwing money at these characterless women, now they went for his wife and he is reacting.
ukraine was never part of NATO and so not in the "we'll help you fight" boat.... but was the agreement to give up nuk3s with NATO itself? or some other agreement? (yeah it always seemed messed up to me that we just throw money or arsenal to ukraine and say good luck. and it worked out sooo well for everyone when we all took a hands off approach back in the 2nd WW. we made treaties and agreements with mr moustache as well, and he just shrugged and did whatever he wanted.) put1n has a lot of reasons it wouldn't be beneficial to stop. one is that they are in a wartime economy. to stop now would likely crash everything into the ground. plus, ukraine has resources and different vehicles of trade that would bolster ruzzia and let them diversify what they can offer. i believe they would also be able to control grain prices in the market. there's a lot of reasons.
Will the Media please STOP referring to our armed forces at "Boots on the ground"!! This is totally disrespectful to our soldiers. They are human beings NOT boots!! They do an incredible job for our country and show them the respect they deserve!
@@Interglacial_optimist Yes, I have been looking at videos from around the world.I thought Chicago was the worse. Moscow looked clean and so did Tokyo.
How, while Britain’s heads of defence are claiming that UK Armed Forces would last only a few weeks in war, would it commit to boots on the ground? Does the rest of NATO plan to do the same?
Telling yourself that ukraine could win was the only way you could justify the paycheck you received while saying it. If only you had been honest and turned down the job of being a propagandist for the CIA then ukraine might not be rubble.
@Ode-to-Odysseus Zolenski chose to join nato. Half the ukrainian people fled the country. America never had what was required to push russia back across the border. Just stating the facts.
Russia stsrts war. Ukraine has to defend itself. Russia starts losing so Russia involves N.Korea. Ukraine gets Western LRMs abd thats an escalation 😂 Sorry Russia but YOU attacked another country then cry like a baby when they slap you back. Do behave.
Russia never started the war, the conflict started in 2014 because the West staged a coup in Ukraine and has since persecuted and killed Russian speakers living in Ukraine.
North korea, iran, syria, North Africa all these countries have committed troops and still are somehow not in direct conflict. Why would the UK get this designation?
Why escalation? Has Ukraine made a war with NKorea? Nooo. Why when UK go to Ukrain there is escalation?
Exactly. Putin gets help from whoever and wherever he can. We should call his bluff and get on with it.
Look it up "PSYOPS". This is what the UK and USA live under. When the populations realise this, then trust me, they will not be happy and have every right to stand up and collapse these brainwashing and dangerous Governments and their propaganda machines, called the media.
It would not be escalation. Russia is throwing all it can at Ukraine, there is no escalation, only necessary defence.
Lol, I don't think England has too much to worry about :)
Not much will change but we’ll live underwater 💁🏻
Denmark is ready to follow UK in this !
That'll make four platoons.
Only toy soldiers have no guts
Also Finland, the Baltic States, Poland. Let's go !
@brianfreeman8290
So there are no jobs available and you're running out of wood to burn to keep warm.
Why not try fishing or farming?
Ok but if you deploy both your platoons what are you fighting the war with?
I had to shake my head when the host said that england could guarantee ukraine's security by putting troops on the ground.
That comment shows ignorance at so many levels It does make me question the competency of his cerebral cortex.
One has to wonder about yours, or maybe it's your intentions. That is not what he said, he asked the guest guaranteeing Ukrainian security with 'what amounts to' British military capacity - he was talking about the wider support of NATO if Ukraine was brought into the alliance as part of a settlement.
Nevertheless, it would help and other nations would likely follow.
Are you a bot? Sure you can have conversations but you never seem to have a definite position on anything?
@Ode-to-Odysseus
I am sure the united states wanted to sell oil to europe And promised to get rid of the nordstream two pipeline.
Mission accomplished.
@Ode-to-Odysseus
There are no nations that would follow. Giving money is easy, especially when you can print it out of thin air.
Sending your young men is entirely different. Besides the west is out of ammunition.
Cold War paranoia all over again
Didn't the cold war destroy the USSR?
Ukraine is losing the war big time and NATO can't do much about it.
Yeah you've been saying that for more than two years
@@michaeldunham3385did nato ever get over their 20 year humiliation in Afghanistan?
They are losing slowly, not big time. With enough weapons and ammunition Ukraine could keep Russia at bay for many years. With a massive increase in air power they could turn the tide.
@hymns4ever197 so why are they pulling people off the street? Why are they even taking down syndrome people off to go and fight? You clearly have no idea whats actually happening.
Our troops are already in Ukraine 🙄
I have an honest question. British news reports that the Brits require America for their defense. What are you doing deploying troops anywhere?
Who said Britain needs America for defence?
@@lovelybitofbugle219 "Who said Britain needs America for defence?"
Britain and apparently they need America to teach reading comprehension as well?
it's more aerial defense from what i understand. also, they need to unfukk their military budgets and not have it outsourced. management needs to be done by ACTUAL military folks, and a list of what's working and what isn't, and what's needed to get up to par. it's been left to a dismal state because of all this.money mismanaged. i really hope they can get around the politicians that thought that was a good idea. and get people who know what they are doing to be top of this instead of friggin outsourcing. trust your military's assessment of whether they have what they need. ffs.
@@ragingmonk6080 You're the only person I've heard say Britain needs America for defence.
And what made you think i couldn't read your comment?
Surely the fact i replied to it, could only mean i read it.
Is English your first language?
How about all those in favour sign up and go to ukraine.
It's time to be realistic... Ukraine has fought heroically, but no sane person thought they could defeat Russia. She should have said time to be honest for once.
Are you saying that only insane people work at Times Radio 😮
Russian Bot
That's funny, Times Radio has always promoted Ukraine can defeat Russia and still do 🤣🤣🤣
the UK was already guaranteeing for Ukraine after they gave up their nuclear weapons, it seems that those promises and guarantees are simply useless and appeasement never works.
zelinsky has made mention of the fact they believed in others, gave up the nuk3s and now they are unprotected against this invasion. IF we have people give up protections and don't protect them... this sort of agreement around the world can potentially fall apart. they will rearm themselves if "guarantees" mean nothing.
If I came to the defence of someone facing an unprovoked and frenzied attack from a madman, in what way would that be an escalation? Those who say it is, please explain.
Read Provoked by Scott Horton ✌️👍
The problem is Russia doses not just want Crimea and the Donbas. They want Crimea and all four oblasts in their entirety.
Don't give it to them, just keep them. Who is stopping you?
British troops have been there since the beginning.
This is the story that really brings the useful idiots out of the woodwork.
Anyone can go to Ukraine. It is not russian terrortory
Absurd premise! Is DPK soldiers in Ukraine going to cause 'direct' war with North Korea? Of course not. Absurd premise!
Still waiting for a shred of evidence that the North Koreans have seen action. So much talk, so little evidence.
If you don’t see the difference then you’re an idiot!
Russia hasn't disturbed UK so why are we getting involved there?? Isn't there enough problem in UK as it is?
You think your opinion counts Ivan.
UK and other western countries will get involved to prevent the decline of Western hegemony, this is what the war in Ukraine is really about 👍
British troops deployed officially would be viewed as direct NATO intervention and hit hard, regardless of Zelenskys latest cap in hand trip to Brussels.
North Korea is there no escalation British is there is escalation
Could Ukraine be invited to join the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) , if NATO membership cannot be agreed upon.
Or at least the common wealth
@@koiguidenishikigoi4972 Ukraine was never part of the former British empire 👍
Is London's air defense ready? Didn't think so....
As if 😂.
Russia would cease to exist 2 hours later if they even thought about it
Along with half of the northern hemisphere 😂
We have a nuclear deterrent.
Weren't you ever taught to never back down from a bully?
No matter how big they are.
Then let's faking have it ,I'm 65 and ready to help my country
That's the spirit mate!
I'll be there with you.
Dumb. UK only interested in training Ukrainian boots. Not fighting Russia directly
😂😂
Not all that much oil/gas in Donbas. If that was true Russia would have done a lot more in Syria to prevent Kuwait pipeline to reach Europe through Syria. Poor argument.
No think of the headlines for Heappey he may even get a place in the bunker for it. Lots of lovely media uproar and looking tough and important marvellous scrap book additions.
Who can remember the last thing Joe biden said in public?
This is the equivalent of NATO; a female friend is pounding on your door, telling you that brutal attackers are trying to dominate her. Your reply is that she must defeat the overwhelming strength of her attackers first and then you will debate opening the door or not. You will also give one of her attackers a veto vote in that discussion. That is the equivalent response that NATO countries are presenting to Ukraine.
I say if you don't open the door now and help her win, the attackers will be back for one of you. The attackers must never win.
On top of that, in the past, the attacker, the person inside and the regional police promised to protect the female, if she gives up her weapons
NATO continued to honey trap the weak timid mans girlfriends one after the other by throwing money at these characterless women, now they went for his wife and he is reacting.
ukraine was never part of NATO and so not in the "we'll help you fight" boat.... but was the agreement to give up nuk3s with NATO itself? or some other agreement? (yeah it always seemed messed up to me that we just throw money or arsenal to ukraine and say good luck. and it worked out sooo well for everyone when we all took a hands off approach back in the 2nd WW. we made treaties and agreements with mr moustache as well, and he just shrugged and did whatever he wanted.)
put1n has a lot of reasons it wouldn't be beneficial to stop. one is that they are in a wartime economy. to stop now would likely crash everything into the ground. plus, ukraine has resources and different vehicles of trade that would bolster ruzzia and let them diversify what they can offer. i believe they would also be able to control grain prices in the market. there's a lot of reasons.
Will the Media please STOP referring to our armed forces at "Boots on the ground"!! This is totally disrespectful to our soldiers. They are human beings NOT boots!! They do an incredible job for our country and show them the respect they deserve!
Well they're going to be wearing boots, I hope. Unless they are wearing levitation boots...
@ob3ythee.t.128 You miss the point totally!!
You can't even protect your own borders ffs 😂
Thank goodness they didn't say, some cannon fodder on the ground.
The British directly at war with Russia would result in London becoming an artificial reef.
You are only saying that to cheer us up. I am a British Veteran and say Ukraine is not our problem.
@paulmorris5166
If you think london is bad check out san francisco.
@@paulmorris5166you're not a British veteran
@@Interglacial_optimist Yes, I have been looking at videos from around the world.I thought Chicago was the worse. Moscow looked clean and so did Tokyo.
Russia's population is highly concentrated in a couple of small areas ... Britain has nukes you know.
How, while Britain’s heads of defence are claiming that UK Armed Forces would last only a few weeks in war, would it commit to boots on the ground? Does the rest of NATO plan to do the same?
"Does the rest of NATO plan to do the same?"
No, America is NATO we just have friends and some are grifters.
What a question!!! If course Putin lost the war... as you are telling us in every program.
What happened to never again! We need to help MORE! Or we WILL be next...
How about trying peace instead WW3.
But the West thinks it is better than everyone else so there can never be peace 👍
its upto soldiers to say no like some did with sfghanistan best to wait and see ehat trump does
Telling yourself that ukraine could win was the only way you could justify the paycheck you received while saying it.
If only you had been honest and turned down the job of being a propagandist for the CIA then ukraine might not be rubble.
Well said, Mr Pootin.
Ukraine chose to fight for her freedom, and rightly so. Our mistake was in giving her too little support.
@Ode-to-Odysseus
Zolenski chose to join nato. Half the ukrainian people fled the country. America never had what was required to push russia back across the border.
Just stating the facts.
@@Ode-to-Odysseus but...but why didn't you give them more. Didn't you have more ????
@brassroots2024
I'm just getting in touch with my inner Katherine the Great.
Russia stsrts war.
Ukraine has to defend itself.
Russia starts losing so Russia involves N.Korea.
Ukraine gets Western LRMs abd thats an escalation 😂
Sorry Russia but YOU attacked another country then cry like a baby when they slap you back. Do behave.
Russia never started the war, the conflict started in 2014 because the West staged a coup in Ukraine and has since persecuted and killed Russian speakers living in Ukraine.
Did you really watch this video??... Watch again and tell me who's crying..hope you get it right this time.
North korea, iran, syria, North Africa all these countries have committed troops and still are somehow not in direct conflict. Why would the UK get this designation?
Zelenskyy gets ready to welcome British Troops.
ruclips.net/video/h80H9SF4aws/видео.html
NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN! Lol
LONG LIVE RUSSIA 🇷🇺
Syphilis has been around a long time too.