Tap to unmute
The True Origin of WWII: What Historians Get Wrong
Embed
- Published on Mar 16, 2026
- The story you were taught about World War II is incomplete.
History textbooks tell us WWII began when Hitler invaded Poland in 1939. But the real origins of the deadliest conflict in human history trace back to bankers, not generals. To boardrooms, not battlefields.
In this video, we expose the economic forces that mainstream narratives conveniently ignore:
→ How the Treaty of Versailles created a financial time bomb that destabilized Europe for two decades
→ The Dawes Plan: How Wall Street pumped billions into Germany, creating a fragile house of cards that collapsed in 1929
→ The exposed connection between the Great Depression and Hitler's rise from fringe extremist to Chancellor
→ The uncomfortable truth about Ford, General Motors, IBM, and Standard Oil doing business with Nazi Germany-some even after war broke out
→ Why the Nazi economic model required conquest to survive
This isn't conspiracy theory. This is documented history buried in archives, exposed at Nuremberg, and examined in Congressional investigations. The records exist. Most people just never look.
Understanding how economic forces create political monsters isn't just about the past. It's about recognizing the warning signs before the next catastrophe.
-
Sources and further reading:
John Maynard Keynes, "The Economic Consequences of the Peace" (1919)
Edwin Black, "IBM and the Holocaust" (2001)
US Holocaust Memorial Museum archives
Centre for Economic Policy Research studies on banking crises and extremism
-
Subscribe for more deep dives into the hidden economic forces shaping history and the power structures operating behind the scenes.
#WWII #History #Economics #HiddenHistory #WorldWarII #Documentary #TreatyOfVersailles #GreatDepression #WallStreet
![Babyfxce E - Talk Expensive [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bqYoaU0rEnk/mqdefault.jpg)
All wars are bankers wars….
Meh, most wars are wanker's wars...,
Especially since Napoleon
And the Jeuus are never to blame 😇😉
When the rich wage war..... it's the poor who die.
Mel Gibson was right.
"I spent 33 years and four months in active service as a member of our country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers." General Smedley Butler
Born '64 into socialst prague. no voice, no progression, only low level substistance. the state placed my uncle in prison for 5 months because he wrote a strongly worded letter concened about the lack of hot water in February. Escaped into Austria 3am running chased by men and dogs, gunfire and the screaming of my friends shot and killed, another placed in prison until 1991. Made it to Munich and remained wit ha WWII eastern front soldier. He spoke to me about how things are. '82 road to southern france and volunteed ffl. Seved to 97. Worked in a factory which was the lifeblood our community and it was owned by the esate. I saw soldier life as some people own it, some people invest in it, some people manage it, some people pull the levers and press the buttons and some clean up. But all of us would fight to keep it.
thirty three. their fave #
Its extremely difficult, and courageous to get a US Medal of Honor.
The Highest Award for Valor.
Gen. Smedley Butler was awarded *2 Medals of Honor*
he was truly a great man.
@Maxworld0044 where are the statues of this great "military" hero? shouldn't he be on the twenty dollar bill? he should be recognized and celebrated no matter whom it displeases.
It's amazing to me that the good guys won every war in history. What are the odds?
right!
That would be the Brits, not the Wanks. The Wanks create wars all over the planet because they are very profitable for them. The Wanks are constantly rewriting history to make themselves the good guys, but alas they are the most evil nation afloat. The average Wank has learned his/her history from Hollywood's anti-British propaganda. They think they won WWII when the Brits and Russians did all the graft, and the Wanks only joined in when the tide began to turn as the first victories against the Axis powers occurred in Stalingrad and El Alamein.
😂😂😂
So Mao Zedong and Stalin were the good guys too?
Jeffrey Epstein and his network of child r***its and murderers make Stalin and Mao look pretty tame by comparison.
Official history is always false. It’s written by the victors in order to justify their actions and blame the war on the defeated country.
Not always. Hitler was an aggressive bad guy
Not false, just leaves out key details that DRIVE opinion
@Thefuturesplaybookor makes up key details
@ralphstern2845 How do you know? You never met him. Everyone who met him liked him.
USSR was the victor in WW2. It defeated Nazi Germany. UK, Canada and USA practically didn't fight against Germany. But WW2 history is monopolized by Western liars and swindlers who concocted oceans of lies about USSR/Russia.
among the major actors in that financial system was a man named prescott bush...that name shuld ring a bell...
Yup!!!
His son repeatedly proclaimed a new world order and helped transform the United States into a North American plutocratic empire that is now on the verge of finally becoming Trumpistan, and the Democrats played their part in this. We are heading for the next Third World War, and the price of gold is already predicting this.
same as Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton who's parents/family did profitable busines with the Nazi's as well aswell as selling them the chemical components to produce Cyclon B of witch they very likely knew what it was used for .
@stalenpinShe might have inherited that, but now we have a President in the US that is lending more money to Ukaraine than it can ever return, expressing that every penny is a loan, not help...
@stalenpinyeah, combatting lice outbreaks...
Yep. Even Hitler in his political testament accuses equally the Bankers for the War.
🙂🙂
- If you believe was Hitler said in his political testament - any other speeches or writings - then you are historically naive!
And the bankers funded both sides !! .....You know there names !!!!
The same global elite are doing the same s*** today
@infinitewisdom8594 hasburgs and rothschild
@kfork814 Only the second one you mentioned.
Ahhh the little hat People again at it. No need to mention that they were the Communists who overtook Russia
my question is did mustache man really go against them or was he just a puppet in on the plan ?
Wow! I had no idea how the American corporations supported the Nazi regime in the '30s and prepared the Nazi machinery for the war at large. Thank you for the truth that is never talked about in American circles. I'm 81, and I am an American who never knew such truth. Again, thank you.
Yes I and many other knew that the Yank made Obscene Profits supplying both side. Then they repatriated the Fascist Nazi Scum to the US because they were deemed
useful. And they also assisted Hitler and Mengele to South America.
And they brought China to power in the 90's and early 20's,,,,,,
This doco almost completely ignores why these corporations funded Germany. It’s not good just to say it happened but why also. They just simply say for bad reasons.
Have a think or do some looking into why these corporations would do this.
Not everything is Black or White, Good or Bad the way history is taught to us.
In WW2, 15_MILLI0N_GERMANS were killed/slaugthered for defending their_country and their lives against the INTERNAL_and external enemy/enemies. During the so_called "rév0lution" at the beginning of the 20th_century more than_30_MILLI0N_RüSSiäNS_were BRUTALLY_SLAUGTHERED for defending their country and lives by the SAME INTERNAL_ and external enemy/enemies.
Probably the GREATEST_Russian_Literature_Classic - War and Peace, Part_1 | BASED ON LEO_TOLSTOY NOVEL | FULL MOVIE from 1962_ ruclips.net/video/bIij-KQ0jYU/video.html
Pat Buchanan explained in his book “Churchill´s war” the true origin of war. Anthony Sutton as well (Wall Street and the rise of Nazis).
Churchills war is a book by David Irving, Pat Buchanans book is Churchill Hitler and the unnecessary war.
@K@KekShekelstein1488Yes, you ´re right, I only have the Buchanan book , but I ´m now abroad. Thanks for info, I will buy the Irving ´s book, but I was a bit disappointed by his book “the Hitler ´s war”, I think his books about the bombing of Dresden or the 1956 Hungarian rebellion were better.
There really was no WW1 and WW2. There was one war that some historians are now calling the Second Thirty Years War because the two so-called separate wars are intricately linked. But behind both wars are lots of financial and banking influence that most people are unaware of. In the end, only the bankers win and the people on all sides lose.
In the final analysis, all wars are manifestations of previous wars, it's the tragic story of humanity since the stone age cave dwellers. Will people ever learn?
@BobOort We have been killing each other since Cain and Abel. So true. And why is that? Human Nature. All problems in the world are related to the nature of humanity. Any group or institution that gets blamed is missing the actual mark because all groups and institutions share the same underlying foundation - human nature. I know I sound like I am contradicting myself by blaming bankers above but bankers are humans and all humans have allowed bankers to have power over us because we like the arrangement or we would have done something about it a long time ago.
I figured this out in junior high.
So you’re saying that my grandfathers & their brothers put their lives on the line for nothing besides making the wealthy wealthier? That millions were not murdered in the Holocaust?
@DesignerLuv Yes, they did, but they fell for the same lies that suck millions of mostly 18 year olds into the profitable military industry to serve as disposable canon fodder. And yes, over a hundred million people were murdered as a direct result of the holocaust, while the remainder of 8 billion people indirectly suffered the consequences of that evil then, and ongoing to this very day.
Yeah and who controls the banks?!!
rich republicans
a question whose answer has been known for centuries
Ummm.........
Sorry we will get targeted if we say !
More importantly why were/are they allowed?
HIS STORY.
Thomas Paine said, " Government at its very best is a necessary evil and at its worst it is an intolerable one." And its been a long time since its been at its best.
We fought the wrong enemy.
Who would have been the right enemy? The communists, who wanted to rule western Europe and later the world? Or secretive groups, who really triggered WW1 and WW2?
Are you saying the Nazis shouldn't have been fought?
@johnbevins6604They would never have started a war against the West. They would have vanished after some years same as Franco und Mussolini.
They did very ugly things, but could they not be influenced during peace?
Why Britain has helped so much to spread communism over Europe? The Russian Communists had killed millions and had started many wars.
@johnbevins6604real ennemies were the jews and the communists. Wake up
“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” George Orwell
He forgot to say that in all European countries, the population grew in the interwar period, including Germany.
But the Bankers are all controlled by the Globalists who continually destroy economies and people so they become richer and richer..you din't hear a lot about this because the Globalists also control 97% of all MSM...get the control picture...WEF and its assoiciate Globalist institutions are the greatest threat always to humanity but most dont even realise this..
yes
All the same.
The bankers are the globalists.
I agree with all of this. I am a retired Air Force officer, and I study history as a hobby. It's fascinating. The Pacific War started in 1905 with The Imperial Cruise. Ever notice we don't hear the translation of Hitler's speeches? He shouted of REVENGE. World War II with Germany started with the Allies' filthy tricks after the Armistice of 1918. But I've found most people can't comprehend why anyone would be interested in the history of wars. The life history of every sports hero? Oh, that is mandatory knowledge. (I'm from Nebraska.) I'm sure we'll repeat the cycle very soon.
@bigsmiler ::
Yes ! It is very, very odd that we don't hear those speeches translated. We need to hear the ideology from the horse's mouth and not in an unknown language given by someone who seems to be a raving dog with rabies.
I’m a big history fan and I agree
@fredflinstone6601❤
❤
💯👍 Here is the framework.
*The events later called World Wars I and II were part of the same conflagration that began around 1900, when the naval powers encircled their continental neighbours. For the American Century after 1900, sitting on the globe's biggest "fence" (Atlantic Ocean/distance) while "eating popcorn" (waiting game), Europe was simply a slightly larger area than Britain was for Rome around the year "0": The technique used by both empires was the same, namely, exploiting existing divisions. Exploiting such divisions for one's own ends is the "divide-and-rule/conquer" strategy.* A proactive means of advancing one's own interests at the expense of others is to favor some (increase the power of the favoured) at the expense of others (decrease the power of the outcast). In the initial stages while the UK kept its power to be the "divider in in chief" herself up to the 1940s, Washington DC did not have to engage much, apart from the overt favouritism of WW1, disguised behind the "nice sounding story".
The OUTSIDERS' strategy was always "if a local/limited war on the continent expands, then the engineered LONG war scenario," and this was declared BY the hegemon. This is not different today than it was 100 years ago, 200 years ago, or 300 years ago. The OUTSIDERS who avoid avoiding war benefit if all others fight to mutual exhaustion. This will not be different today now that Zelenski has recognized how he had been duped into the long war by Boris Johnson (Istanbul proposals torpedoed, whilst "blaming the other side"). For the "divider," sitting on the fence watching, the multitude of reasons, motivations, ideologies, justifications, opinions, excuses, or the interests of those who cooperate in achieving the beneficial division for the higher power are not important. For the dividing power, it does not matter how the division is implemented, or how existing divisions are deepened, or who is helping for whatever reasons, or whether those who favor and abet the division even _know_ that they are supporting the division: what matters is _that_ division is implemented. For the outside divider with a geographical advantage of distance from violent events, it is not important *why* the chosen tools choose to work together for the gains of the empire, but the fact *that* the chosen tools work together to create division and overwhelm a part of the planet somewhere.
*"How"* and *"that"* are different premises.
The empire is in search of profit, only "interests" are important. There are more than enough examples of strategists who openly admit this. The apologists will never address this, since they instinctively realize that they BENEFIT from wars elsewhere. All these "fence sitters" have to do is wait for the crash, boom, bang, then sail in and benefit...
The conflagration that took place after the 1990s have a prequel in European history, in the events of the 1890s up to 1914 and at Versailles. In case anybody doubts the validity of the above assessment I suggest a "map", upon which one can plot the encirclement of Central Europe after the 1890s. Maps are a primary source of information more valuable than words spoken by another human being, prone to lies and deception. This setup continued after WW1, with the only change being that instead of a small number of large "encirclers," (pre-1914) there were now a large number of small "encirclers" (post-1919). The "world war" after 1914 was another European 30-year war (with a 20-year break in between). The divisions thus established around the year 1900 were:
1) the naval powers (Britain/USA) with their continental allies as "buck catchers" (such as France after 1904 and Russia after 1907) favouring long wars.
set up against:
2) the continental alliances favouring short wars, which were encircled and prevented from reaching sufficient spheres of influence for their growth by the naval supremacy of 1), and this encirclement strategy began as a deliberate action by the naval powers around 1900.
The Albion used its unassailable GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION on the map to play games, not ONLY in Europe, but globally:
*Divide-and-gain (power for own systems).*
If not.
*Divide-and-control (a situation from the high ground).*
If not.
*Divide-and-rule (by drawing lines on the map, weakening others, etc.).*
If not.
*Divide-and-conquer (markets, sphere of influence, whatever).*
If not.
*Divide-and-destroy (those who refuse to bow down to exploitation and division).*
This strategy was simply repeated after a short respite called the Cold War (1945-1991), with the 1990's Wolfowitz Doctrine/US imperialist claim to power with "US primacy" as the top priority, and Yugoslavian unity the first victim on the marching route. Written down in strategy papers, for all to see. This time around the "targets" of the global strategy of divide-and-rule were not Central Europe/Central Powers (Treaty of Versailles, and others), but rather China and Russia. The new default rivals were shifted further east. The final goal of our off-continental (non-Eurasian) "friends" in Washington DC is to crush China as they once crushed Europe, then carve it up into little pieces like they did with Europe, via their "friends" the UK and France (London and Paris), using the block mentality of blockheads, in the form of _divided neighbours_ as "tools" on a "chessboard" and later claim total innocence and "world saviour"-status for themselves. After a short halt called "Cold War", the march of the empire continued, on the marching route of the empire, which started when the USSR economically faltered in the late-1980s.
Systemic/ideological expansion into, as concerted effort called divide-and-rule.
- Eastern Europe.
- Balkans/Black Sea/Caucasus region (southern pincer of advance).
- Baltic/Scandinavia (northern pincer of advance).
This was simply the continuation of the scheme to overpower Russia which dated from WW1, to make use of the weakness created by 3 years of war (1914-17/Eastern Front) exhausting and extending all. Therefore, it was never in the "interest" of the victors to achieve a fair balance of powers in Europe, as was the case in 1815 (balance of power/Concert of Europe). The intention was to create an IMbalance of powers as foundation, which could be exploited, regardless of what the political doves thought they were doing. Keep on marching, marching, and when there is a reaction or resistance (aka "defensive realism") by those encroached upon or encircled, get the propagandists to start "pointing fingers" (narrative control) at those being encircled or encroached upon. This type of imperialist behaviour as evident by Washington DC, and their subservient "collective West/NATO", did not only start after WW2. Ask the First Nations, or Mexico.
Because of the own ideological indoctrination (something gladly attributed to others, aka "finger pointing") and proudly stated by such tropes as being "good guys" or "on right side of history" and being an "indispensable nation", *the encirclers* will never admit their own corruption because they feel better about the realities they have imposed on their neighbours either directly or by proxy, and do not intend to follow a simple moral logic of a strategy of power called the GOLDEN RULE: "Don't do unto others what you do not want done to you." Do you want to be encircled and encroached upon? Then do not do it to others. If you cannot follow such a simple logic, you must follow the logic of causality where there is a muddy trench waiting for _you._ Note: not these so-called "leaders" who deceive you here. For _you,_ personally, the one reading this. The bunker boys and manipulators are safely tucked away in the bunkers, chanting slogans from their "mommy's basements", or hiding behind their keyboards (keyboard warriors), hoping they'll never end up where they cheer for.
The current "Greenland narrative" is nothing else but systemic expansion, started in 1776 and never stopped. An insatiable empire, hiding behind a narrative. Fact is that during WW1 planners in London, Washington DC and Paris _were already planning their war against Russia in 1918,_ as systemic expansion, and needed "new best fwiends" (Eastern Europeans) to sacrifice as proxies, doing most of the fighting and dying, while they stood off and used their navies to "nibble around the edges" of Russia, and later step in with systemic expansion, and systemic profit and gain. Why is this a fact? Because it actually happened. This habit of finding proxies to do most of the fighting and dying repeated after the 1990s, looking for Slavic people who could be set up against their neighbours. Trust the Albion once, and you are in its "fangs" forever...
Today?
History is repeating.
Albion 2.0
*Anybody who "believes" WW1/WW2 ever "ended" is already the fool, sacrificing himself for the systemic expansion and gain of "friends".*
Imagine not knowing what WW1 and WW2 was about, and getting emotionally triggered every time your ideological standpoint is contested. WW1 and WW2 was about the destruction of the European balance of power, est. 1815, and this destruction was carried out by OUTSIDE ideologues, who entered Europe "Trojan Horse"-style, initially into the UK and France (destruction of the reign of monarchy, "sold" to the plebs as an "advantage"), and other countries on the fringes of Europe, intent on systemic gain. They used tools (aka "proxies") to do most of the fighting and dying for them. The Treaty of Versailles was the first attempt to keep Germany "down" in European/global affairs, Russia "out" of European/global affairs, and the USA "in" (Lord Ismay) European/global affairs. It only failed because the USA did not sign up. The USA could afford to wait. Distance = impunity = advantage.
*This is divide-and-rule.*
There is a very old saying " Those who fail to learn the lessons of the past are destined to repeat the mistakes of the past".
The fact the history books have been white washed with lies means those lessons can never be learnt and the plebs shall continue to pay the ultimate price.
How short we forget and History repeats
EXACTLY MY THOUGHTS !!! IF You dont Know HISTORY it WILL REPEAT itself !! THAT my friend, IS the PROBLEM in OUR COUNTRY USA IGNORANCE of the PAST !! It IS APPALLING how little Young People Know about HISTORY in Modern America ....
no. those who fail to learn from history live a happy ignorant life while those who learned suffer watching people deliciously eating shit right in front of him. So. the whitewashed history book maybe the blessing.
solution, dont be a pleb.
Have you ever watched Europa The last battle. A far more comprehensive look at the same topic. It's hard to find though.
it's been banned, no?
hmmmm, i wonder why.
europa the last battle is good for surface level, but its just KKK supremacist rambling and try to hijack third positionist ideology.
"Europa: last battle" & "The Greatest story Never told" & "1/4 the holocaust".
עם ישראל חי ❤
How short we forget and History repeats ...this needs to be showen on TV
This video is completely biased as well and lacks lots of important information. If you really want to see a different point of view search for "Europa last battle" documentary
The AI made Hitler look like Frank Zappa.
😂
I like Frank. "And the torture never stops"
I saw him in concert. He never sat on his stool, as it had stacks of packs of smokes.
EXCELLENT CONCERT!
Yeah...I caught that! HA!
Israel Zionist supporter then! Which Zyklon, wich death camps the ones that have been modified by US and UK after the war?
Pitiful!
I thought they just got his moustache wrong but.... Now that you mention it it's all I can see :0
WW1 killed 8.5 Million, not 20 Million, but the H1N1 disease, which the USA brought to Europe in March 1918 killed 100 Million in just 2 years - the US wrote it out of history.
The Treaty of Versailles destroyed the Economic Machine of Europe - Germany and with it Europe itself. The Treaty made the US to the New Superpower and the US got drunk on it.
Stalin started to march toward Western Europe beginning in 1924, he wanted it all and the only country to stop him was Germany.
WW2 started on 3 Sept 1939, when France and Britain attacked Germany and supported Stalin to attack Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania.
H1N1_ is NOT a disease, but P0I$ON, exactly like c0v(id)v!rus : The:word_Virüs in_Latin means "poi$on", not more and not less
Agreed.
Poland fought off red swarm from Europe, not Germany.
None of this information is hidden at all. Most people don’t bother to learn
FDR was a major stock holder in IG Farben.
Very good video and nearly fully correct. I would add one element.
At the beginning in talking of the Treaty of Versailles it does not mention the French and their veneance.
In 1871 Germany and France had a war. France lost very badly. The French wanted revenge long afterward.
Their opportunity came at Versailles.
While the other Entente countries were okay with light penalties on Germany, Feance pushed for severe penalties. They succeeded in two, especially.
First, the reparations. They weee far more than Germany was going to be able to pay. This mentions their effects and is correct. I am pointing the French over the top drive to punish Germany.
Secondly, France pushed for and got control of Germany's industrial Rhineland. This additional punishment crippled Germany's economy and made Germany hate the French and want their own revenge.
When Hitler defeated France in 1940, Hitler forced them to surrender in exact train car the the Germans had been forced to surrender in, in 1918.
France's revenge hurt Germany badly at Versailles, much more than necessary. The French revenge came at a very high price - the rise of Hitler.
Eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind. Now what to do ?
He also forgot about Poland killing ethnic Germans and multiple warnings of it before Bloody Sunday 1939.
Your history books are slanted and less than truthful, Germany was fighting for its life. Living standards rose and people didnt feel enslaved anymore
Germany had to go to war or as bills came due they would not be able to fight a war
yeahbut, who would have bet on a down and out mouthy excorporal, grabbing power of Germany ?
we foget, ww1 land war, was virually only on Frances soil, hundreds of square miles of once furtoil land were smashed and poisoned, ancient villages towns and cities destroyed. Germany was hardly touched in WW1. I fully understand french anger and need for revenge. If German industrial Barons and Bank owner's had not panicked over the growing threat of communism, they wouldn't have supported Hitler and his mad Nazis hoards.
Even when the powerful get exposed by Jeffery Epstein events they still get away with it. Nothing has changed except now the global economy and civilization that created all this rapacious consumption of natural resources it is on the verge of collapse. The Second World War was not simply a battle between good and evil, but also a crisis produced by systemic economic failures and enabled
by profit- seeking businesses that placed their bottom lines above any consideration of morality. Nearly 80 years after the end of World War II, why does any of this matter? Because the forces that produced that catastrophe haven't disappeared. Economic instability still creates opportunities for extremism. Financial crisis still undermine democracies. Corporations still do business with regimes that
violate human rights. And the connections between money and power are still obscured behind layers of complexity that most people never penetrate.
The visual AI created commentary is a prime example of AI slop. Countries are always shown within the borders created after WWII, even when the events discussed happened earlier. Flags are faulty. Swasikas are displayed on ships prior to the Nazi-Era. "Newspaperclips" show a nonsensical array of letters with no meaning in any known language. Real politicians are hardly recognizable. You could go on. Although the commentary is interesting, the faulty visuals provoke scepticism towards the whole clip.
nothing gets past you
It’s done for copyright purposes and RUclips policy. It’s the information that’s important not the pictures 😂😂😂
History rhymes.
*The events later called World Wars I and II were part of the same conflagration that began around 1900, when the naval powers encircled their continental neighbours. For the American Century after 1900, sitting on the globe's biggest "fence" (Atlantic Ocean/distance) while "eating popcorn" (waiting game), Europe was simply a slightly larger area than Britain was for Rome around the year "0": The technique used by both empires was the same, namely, exploiting existing divisions. Exploiting such divisions for one's own ends is the "divide-and-rule/conquer" strategy.* A proactive means of advancing one's own interests at the expense of others is to favor some (increase the power of the favoured) at the expense of others (decrease the power of the outcast). In the initial stages while the UK kept its power to be the "divider in in chief" herself up to the 1940s, Washington DC did not have to engage much, apart from the overt favouritism of WW1, disguised behind the "nice sounding story".
The OUTSIDERS' strategy was always "if a local/limited war on the continent expands, then the engineered LONG war scenario," and this was declared BY the hegemon. This is not different today than it was 100 years ago, 200 years ago, or 300 years ago. The OUTSIDERS who avoid avoiding war benefit if all others fight to mutual exhaustion. This will not be different today now that Zelenski has recognized how he had been duped into the long war by Boris Johnson (Istanbul proposals torpedoed, whilst "blaming the other side"). For the "divider," sitting on the fence watching, the multitude of reasons, motivations, ideologies, justifications, opinions, excuses, or the interests of those who cooperate in achieving the beneficial division for the higher power are not important. For the dividing power, it does not matter how the division is implemented, or how existing divisions are deepened, or who is helping for whatever reasons, or whether those who favor and abet the division even _know_ that they are supporting the division: what matters is _that_ division is implemented. For the outside divider with a geographical advantage of distance from violent events, it is not important *why* the chosen tools choose to work together for the gains of the empire, but the fact *that* the chosen tools work together to create division and overwhelm a part of the planet somewhere.
*"How"* and *"that"* are different premises.
The empire is in search of profit, only "interests" are important. There are more than enough examples of strategists who openly admit this. The apologists will never address this, since they instinctively realize that they BENEFIT from wars elsewhere. All these "fence sitters" have to do is wait for the crash, boom, bang, then sail in and benefit...
The conflagration that took place after the 1990s have a prequel in European history, in the events of the 1890s up to 1914 and at Versailles. In case anybody doubts the validity of the above assessment I suggest a "map", upon which one can plot the encirclement of Central Europe after the 1890s. Maps are a primary source of information more valuable than words spoken by another human being, prone to lies and deception. This setup continued after WW1, with the only change being that instead of a small number of large "encirclers," (pre-1914) there were now a large number of small "encirclers" (post-1919). The "world war" after 1914 was another European 30-year war (with a 20-year break in between). The divisions thus established around the year 1900 were:
1) the naval powers (Britain/USA) with their continental allies as "buck catchers" (such as France after 1904 and Russia after 1907) favouring long wars.
set up against:
2) the continental alliances favouring short wars, which were encircled and prevented from reaching sufficient spheres of influence for their growth by the naval supremacy of 1), and this encirclement strategy began as a deliberate action by the naval powers around 1900.
The Albion used its unassailable GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION on the map to play games, not ONLY in Europe, but globally:
*Divide-and-gain (power for own systems).*
If not.
*Divide-and-control (a situation from the high ground).*
If not.
*Divide-and-rule (by drawing lines on the map, weakening others, etc.).*
If not.
*Divide-and-conquer (markets, sphere of influence, whatever).*
If not.
*Divide-and-destroy (those who refuse to bow down to exploitation and division).*
This strategy was simply repeated after a short respite called the Cold War (1945-1991), with the 1990's Wolfowitz Doctrine/US imperialist claim to power with "US primacy" as the top priority, and Yugoslavian unity the first victim on the marching route. Written down in strategy papers, for all to see. This time around the "targets" of the global strategy of divide-and-rule were not Central Europe/Central Powers (Treaty of Versailles, and others), but rather China and Russia. The new default rivals were shifted further east. The final goal of our off-continental (non-Eurasian) "friends" in Washington DC is to crush China as they once crushed Europe, then carve it up into little pieces like they did with Europe, via their "friends" the UK and France (London and Paris), using the block mentality of blockheads, in the form of _divided neighbours_ as "tools" on a "chessboard" and later claim total innocence and "world saviour"-status for themselves. After a short halt called "Cold War", the march of the empire continued, on the marching route of the empire, which started when the USSR economically faltered in the late-1980s.
Systemic/ideological expansion into, as concerted effort called divide-and-rule.
- Eastern Europe.
- Balkans/Black Sea/Caucasus region (southern pincer of advance).
- Baltic/Scandinavia (northern pincer of advance).
This was simply the continuation of the scheme to overpower Russia which dated from WW1, to make use of the weakness created by 3 years of war (1914-17/Eastern Front) exhausting and extending all. Therefore, it was never in the "interest" of the victors to achieve a fair balance of powers in Europe, as was the case in 1815 (balance of power/Concert of Europe). The intention was to create an IMbalance of powers as foundation, which could be exploited, regardless of what the political doves thought they were doing. Keep on marching, marching, and when there is a reaction or resistance (aka "defensive realism") by those encroached upon or encircled, get the propagandists to start "pointing fingers" (narrative control) at those being encircled or encroached upon. This type of imperialist behaviour as evident by Washington DC, and their subservient "collective West/NATO", did not only start after WW2. Ask the First Nations, or Mexico.
Because of the own ideological indoctrination (something gladly attributed to others, aka "finger pointing") and proudly stated by such tropes as being "good guys" or "on right side of history" and being an "indispensable nation", *the encirclers* will never admit their own corruption because they feel better about the realities they have imposed on their neighbours either directly or by proxy, and do not intend to follow a simple moral logic of a strategy of power called the GOLDEN RULE: "Don't do unto others what you do not want done to you." Do you want to be encircled and encroached upon? Then do not do it to others. If you cannot follow such a simple logic, you must follow the logic of causality where there is a muddy trench waiting for _you._ Note: not these so-called "leaders" who deceive you here. For _you,_ personally, the one reading this. The bunker boys and manipulators are safely tucked away in the bunkers, chanting slogans from their "mommy's basements", or hiding behind their keyboards (keyboard warriors), hoping they'll never end up where they cheer for.
The current "Greenland narrative" is nothing else but systemic expansion, started in 1776 and never stopped. An insatiable empire, hiding behind a narrative. Fact is that during WW1 planners in London, Washington DC and Paris _were already planning their war against Russia in 1918,_ as systemic expansion, and needed "new best fwiends" (Eastern Europeans) to sacrifice as proxies, doing most of the fighting and dying, while they stood off and used their navies to "nibble around the edges" of Russia, and later step in with systemic expansion, and systemic profit and gain. Why is this a fact? Because it actually happened. This habit of finding proxies to do most of the fighting and dying repeated after the 1990s, looking for Slavic people who could be set up against their neighbours. Trust the Albion once, and you are in its "fangs" forever...
Today?
History is repeating.
Albion 2.0
*Anybody who "believes" WW1/WW2 ever "ended" is already the fool, sacrificing himself for the systemic expansion and gain of "friends".*
Imagine not knowing what WW1 and WW2 was about, and getting emotionally triggered every time your ideological standpoint is contested. WW1 and WW2 was about the destruction of the European balance of power, est. 1815, and this destruction was carried out by OUTSIDE ideologues, who entered Europe "Trojan Horse"-style, initially into the UK and France (destruction of the reign of monarchy, "sold" to the plebs as an "advantage"), and other countries on the fringes of Europe, intent on systemic gain. They used tools (aka "proxies") to do most of the fighting and dying for them. The Treaty of Versailles was the first attempt to keep Germany "down" in European/global affairs, Russia "out" of European/global affairs, and the USA "in" (Lord Ismay) European/global affairs. It only failed because the USA did not sign up. The USA could afford to wait. Distance = impunity = advantage.
*This is divide-and-rule.*
Dismantling the Empire was a primary goal. In my youth the pound was stronger than the Yanky tolla.
@ralphbernhard ::
Your comment is breathtakingly and historically extensive ; but, if I may, the Cold-War did not start in 1945. It started in 1918 when a u.s. led coalition of nations invaded Russia to end the Bolshevik Revolution. This was the first physical force against Russia because of its new political system that was expressley Anti-Capitalist.
This is happening in America right now
my Fathers familie was VERY rich
@ralphbernhard1757 grand grandfather was the advisor and friend of the last german emperor.
and he is seen on Versailles contract pictures....
as you can guess my family was not very popular during nazi regime
and lost billions.
but hey atleast we are allive till now.
thanks for sharing!
So about what kind of outsider are you talking. those ones with tiny hats ?
@johnwilliams3555👍💯 Washington DC's main target was the British Empire, which is why they came to "make friends" here. Trump's C5 is "history rhyming". It's nothing else but the Great Rapprochement 2.0. The original post-1895 Great Rapprochement was "getting on the inside (of Europe) and breaking it up from the inside (strategy of power)." Now the C5 is "getting on the inside of Asia/BRICS, and then breaking it up from inside."
Then blaming everybody else.
THE GREAT RAPPROCHEMENT 1.0
Around the year 1900 London's lords set out to encircle (by proxy) its biggest economic contester: Germany.
HOW TO LOSE YOUR EMPIRE: 2024 VERSION
Most debates are a completely pointless waste of time, same as 99% of all history books. Ancillary details being regurgitated again and again, in efforts to distract from what really happened. Ever since the establishment of their Empire, London aimed to expand and protect it, by (as a matter policy), making the strongest continental power/alliance the rival in peace/enemy in war. London was always going to oppose the strongest continental country/power/alliance, as a default setting. A virtual admission that divide and rule/conquer was at the heart of these policies, since it was only nominally or (quote) "technically known" as balance of power.
By own admission: "The equilibrium established by such a grouping of forces is *technically known* as the balance of power, and it has become almost an historical truism to identify England’s secular policy with the maintenance of this balance by throwing her weight now in this scale and now in that, but ever on the side, opposed to the political dictatorship of the strongest single, State or group at any time." (From a primary source)
In a nutshell, oppose every major diplomatic advance made by the strongest continental power in times of peace, and ally against it in times of war. This had nothing to do with Germany as such. Before that, it was France. London's fatal mistake was snuggling up to the rising American Century, as the Great Rapprochement in stages after 1895, thinking it would serve further expansion, easy victories, and save the British Empire. This "hopping from one side of a scale" (countries) to another, balancing out powers on the continent, is also known, and not generally contested by historians as the "avoid the single hegemony on the continent"-narrative. After 1895, finally, here was a another power (Washington DC) which did not constantly insist on signatures or long-term/binding alliances. Washington DC seemed to express and share the lords' heartfelt desire for the free hand, to address issues as they rose. The two powers started nodding off each others' conquests (generally agreed upon narrative is that US imperialism started in 1898, with the Spanish-American War). Every decision made back then was a conscious choice, made in London, by the London lords, and as a result of age-old London policy standpoints. Any attempt to spin history into a version of events portraying London of acting defensively, or as a result of a real or immediate danger, or trying to protect the world, or taken under duress or outside pressure, or otherwise, are fallacies.
*Logic? Reason? If you are a dragon (imperial power), don't snuggle up to a dragon slayer (a self-proclaimed, anti-imperialist power).*
EPISODE I:
1901: "... 'I look forward with confidence to the co-operation of the English-speaking races (edit: the term "races" was not used the same way it is today) becoming the most powerful civilizing factor in the policy of the world." SOURCE: "ROYAL PAINS, WILHELM II, EDWARD VII AND ANGLO-GERMAN RELATIONS, 1888-1910." There is a big picture reality which does not change, irrelevant of what story we are being told. And if you are a dragon (imperial power), don't snuggle up to a dragon slayer (anti-imperialist power). The suitably distanced and the just-so-happened-to-have-been the long-term historical victim of mostly British and French "divide and rule"-policies called Washington DC as North America's single hegemony, was "standing down and standing by" (strategy of power) to make a "pig's breakfast" (chaos as strategy) out of European empires the minute they weakened.
EPISODES II thru IV:
Lotsa other stuff happening.
EPISODE V:
If one has failed to engineer a just global balance of power in a timely fashion, but rather has narcissistic and self-centered imperialist aims and goals, then THIS happens:
"What actually occurred was that Britain and other countries became hopelessly indebted to the United States once again (edit: during World War 2) ... “We have profited by our past mistakes,” announced Roosevelt in a speech delivered on September 3, 1942. *“This time we shall know how to make full use of victory.”* This time the U.S. Government would conquer its allies in a more enlightened manner, by demanding economic concessions of a legal and political nature instead of futilely seeking repayment of its wartime loans (of World War 1). The new postwar strategy sought and secured foreign markets for U.S. exports, and new fields for American investment capital in Europe’s raw materials producing colonial areas. Despite Roosevelt’s assurances to the contrary, Britain was compelled, under the Lend-Lease agreements and the terms of the first great U.S. postwar loan to Britain, to relinquish Empire Preference and to open all its markets to U.S. competition, at a time when Britain desperately needed these markets as a means by which to fund its sterling debt. Most important of all, Britain was forced to unblock its sterling and foreign-exchange balances built up by its colonies and other Sterling Area countries during the wartime years. Instead of the Allied Powers as a whole bearing the costs of these wartime credits to British Empire countries, they would be borne by Britain itself. Equally important, they would not be used as “blocked” balances that could be used only to buy British or other Sterling Area exports, but would be freed to purchase exports from any nation. Under postwar conditions this meant that they would be used in large part to purchase U.S. exports. (page 115/116) By relinquishing its right to block these balances, Britain gave up its option, while enabling the United States to make full use of its gold stock as the basis for postwar lending to purchased generalized (primarily U.S.) exports. At a stroke, Britain’s economic power was broken. What Germany as foe had been unable to accomplish in two wars against Britain, the United States accomplished with ease as its ally.(Page 117) Furthermore, under the terms on which it joined the International Monetary Fund, Britain could not devalue the pound sterling so as to dissipate the foreign-exchange value of these balances. Its liability thus was maximized - and so was America’s gain from the pool of liquidity that these balances now represented." SOURCE: "Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire," 2nd edition 2003. Hudson gives a perfect description of the "divide and rule/conquer"-strategy, as performed on a weakened own friend when the time was ripe for the pushover...
*No markets = no trade = no money = no power = no influence = no Empire.*
This is divide-and-rule/conquer.
If one no longer is the "balancer of powers," one is no longer the arbiter of power. When Europe failed, as all states fought to mutual exhaustion, who gained most?
*Only ONE attribute decides whether a system is THE DIVIDER, or becomes a part of "the divided": POWER.*
_After 1945 London was turned from its role of "divider of the world" into the role of "one of the divided"._
The role of FAVORITE junior partner, the "peaceful handover of power" and related "special relationship"-narrative.
"Special"-relationship narrative in a power balance. These Washington DC power mongers must be rotfl...
_London went from chief divider of the world to "chief of the divided" in less than a quarter of a century._
After 1945 there was no more multi-polar world to divide and rule over, and London had to give way to Washington DC (American Century) and a new uni-polar reality of master/junior partner. The old colonial master, now the new junior partner. A Big Three to rule the world? No such thing. The Truman Doctrine was Washington DC's unmistakable *alpha bark* to "heel boy"...choose either Washington DC or Moscow. You are either FOR us, or against us. And the new left-leaning British government (frantically busy selling everything it could get its hands on for gold, incl. brand new jet technology to their WW2 communist friends in Moscow), had no choice but to obey. There would be no more "hopping" about onto some or other power in order to "balance out" the power of Washington DC. There was nobody left to "hop onto" to play the age-old "divide and rule"-games.
*All as a consequence of own misguided previous attitudes (policy standpoints) and actions going back centuries*
Therefore, as a result of an own unwillingness to adapt to changing realities, their own Empire died. They preached Darwinism, and succumbed to it. The urge to deflect blame for the own actions (encirclement strategy) which backfired leading to the end of the British Empire is human nature.
The reality is that lower tiers don't "win" anything (gain) in wars. The higher systemic tiers "win" at the expense of the masses. The end result is then always the same as 99% lose, and the tops of the pyramids of power (industrial, financial, political tiers) "win" bigtime.
*This is the divide-and-rule world.*
Galatians 6:7 sates that "... whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."
Sowed division, ended up reaping division.
Great!! What is the role of the US Government in this history? Did the US ENCOURAGE investment in Germany? Of course they did, perhaps for "humanitarian reasons". Was the US government aware of militarism and rebuilding of military forces in violation of treaty? Of course they were. Did the US participate in WW I and the Versailles Treaty? Of course we did. You just explained the causes of WW II without MENTIONING the WORST culprit - the US GOVERNMENT!
Until today many of the wars that started, ended, and/or on going, the financiers and bankers are still the main cause and culprit
There's a lot of truth in this video that has been brutally suppressed in the West for years. The Treaty of Versailles was an unjust peace forced upon Germany. The injustice of this agreement was a financial disaster for Germany, which Adolf Hitler exploited during his rise to power. Had it not been for Versailles, WW2 might never have happened.
So, what about the Jews? 😂
One of reasons for WW2 is that capitalists hated Russian people. Who don't accept capitalist values and created great USSR. Read Russian history and see how Western bandit gangs again and again invaded Russia- to kill, to rob, to commit crimes and atrocities. And this is true now.
BS - Versailles was totally justified - Germany got off lightly- it should have been broken up into dozens of micro states- then WW2 would never have happened.
@BrianRogan-v6s Nonsense. Ask any historian about the Versailles Treaty and they'll tell you it was an outright injustice. Not only was Germany forced to pay huge restorations to Europe, but their factories were raided and the machinery stolen, which hindered their ability to pay their debt. Germany was rightfully punished, but the way it was done was a gross error. Versailles paved the road to World War 2.
@BrianRogan-v6s yet another jewmerkan spewing lies. Germany did not start WW1, so why should she be forced to pay for it?
Just look at the Ukraine now and how it’s being fueled and by who. Ukraine has absolutely nothing to do with the United States and the United States People want nothing to do with the Ukraine. Yet the United States Government pumps hundreds of billions of dollars into it while our people suffer and drown in debt.
If you want nothing to do with war, then they threaten nuclear war against huge populations of innocent people. Hard working, innocent people who never hurt anyone will be burned alive and forced into a horror show. Maybe we’ll wake up before they kill us all and kill them first. 99% vs 1% should be easy but the brainwashing is very effective and our media is now a tool of the government.
When the country tanks, go after the banks before they slaughter us.
I was six years old around that time, and listening to this makes memories surface that I haven’t thought about in decades. I didn’t understand geopolitics or banking systems, but I remember how war and economics reached right into ordinary homes
So do i
5:50 "The moment credit stooped flowing the whole edifice collapses." On October 29,1929 the Trans-Atlantic central banks withdrew the flow of money with margin calls and the entire Western hemisphere economy collapsed. The same disaster is looming in 2026.
Hardly surprising. Since history repeats itself, and our recent times financial crisis was in 2008, guess where we are heading towards…
... the New York Order.
Can I see your papers please? (in my finest German accent!)
Venezuela.
@Steve-tr7400a Kann ich Ihre Papiere sehen? (just to show English is a very Germanic language)
Before every war, economic warfare and power struggles take place, sides are determined, and the pretext for war is prepared; then comes the tragic result.
Hidden history gets my attention. I am a history detective
The school books sugar-coat it so much. :(
@perfectsplit5515I agree
All wars are created by bankers who want control of the profits from armaments and loans and debtsthat cannot be repaid. Then lawyers get involved to take their share of what’s left over. The general populace are either dead or being financially screwed.
Great work, people need to know this. Follow the money. All wars are bankers wars. Can you begin to imagine the financial truth about all the wars after WWII. The time of reckoning has come.
and look what is going on right now.... we are entering again such situation .... again forced by bankers that want more money.
If you look at the EU, run by a german 'dictator' vonder Leyen, doing stuf which ... they also did in the beginning of WOII in Germany, censorship, totalitarian government , 'demanding' public obedience, wanting total control of everything we Europeans do.
Then there is the WEF, also wanting a 'New World Order', and also wanting total control over the population.
Then there is the WHO also wanting total control over the world , determine what 'medicin' we as the public 'must use' ffor our health.
Then there is the world wide 'tention' among the big continents, all wanting control over the world, ...
And again, we, the common people have to suffer for those rich billionairs who think we are just slaves. Having billions seems not to satisfy these billionairs anymore> they all think they can rule the world.
Filthy lucre, it always comes down to that. Bankers & large multi-national corporations who have their feet planted in every country, win big regardless of who wins/loses the war.
Unfortunately is all over humanity, money and power created such a big greed. Some people are willing to end the human and world for their greed which will never be filled.
Very informative. But whats with the images the the Austrian painter's mustache? Did the A.I. artist refuse to make it?
probably is the mustache a link to that what Adolf Hitler really wanted to be in life, be a painter.
This should remind us of the fact that history books always contain only part of the truth.
It is a fact that businesses in Germany that were British owned ,😊were looked after by the Germans till the war ended,and vice versa we did the same for them,so that when it finished they could carry on as before
AAAAAAHHHHHHH this bs drives me crazy if you can't even use the correct map 2min mark (that is a post ww2 map not a post ww1 pre ww2) your credibility is sheezzitt.
Its just all AI
@robertdalomba2629 YAH Artificial Idiot
The truth is coming more and more to the surface.
Thank you.
Curious how there is absolutely NO mention of the Fear of Bolschevism / 'Communist Revolution' coming from the East !
The documents of the so-called 'Appeasement' all show that the Hitler was given the green light by Chamberlain to attack
to the East. [ Krupp seized the Ukrainian steel factories taken by the Wehrmacht in 1941 ! ]
EXACTLY, not to mention the shameless promotion of the BIG LIE too.
You seem to forget another element of this calamity: TARIFFS!, trade barriers,.. and the economy of autarky. (And the pictures of bombed german factories after ww1 are off to.... they didn't get bombed.),... Thus, already in the 1920ties Germans couldn't sell their cars and other German stuff in France, England and so on, to earn money for reparations,... Countries protected their own industries,... and this got worse in the 1930ties,.. .giving rise to the notion that every major 'power' had to secure all essensial raw materials and food for itself!!,....
All designed to enhance and more toward the desired outcome.
I recently saw a video about how Germany was trying to build a railroad to the Middle East for oil and was hindered by France and England.
@leewade9798 ye
Somehow, A.I. can’t get history’s most notorious mustache right.
Excellent historical video with voluminous historical FACTS. However, you completely failed to mention the role of Montague Norman and the Bank of England in the rise of the Nazis. I hope it wasn't intentional.
Wow... thank you for all the research on this, and for putting this presentation together...
At the conclusion of the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919, David Lloyd George, the UK representative, stated that the next European war would start over the Free City of Danzig.
It is hard to imagine that people were dumb enough to believe that separating Germany from East Prussia was a lasting solution.
The original channel is called Cinematic History Tales, this man's voice is very unique.
0:38 Question I been asking 30y! Europe has been war project for Washington since 1848
Not only Europe.
Just look at the "Color‑Coded War Plans" from 1900-1930 which were partly quite detailed and practically against every relevant country including GB and France, and which were regolarly adjusted.
The Marshall Plan is not what you have been told; and the European Union has been a 80 year project for Washington.
@JoeH-b1q thats why america is dying its bases are like dedan tyre and ur with sumer akkad babel luz bethel beit omri
No no no it’s the Jews not , Washington
Why does this always come to one answer?
Everystein
Singleberg
Timeowitz
@KekShekelstein1488עם ישראל חי ❤ We will survive u. We are a civilization. U are a bunch of insecurities
@KekShekelstein1488עם ישראל חי ❤ We will survive u. We are a civilization. U are a bunch of insecurities
FDR and Churchill lied us into WWII.
Huh?
@gearflut.1there was no reason for america to be involved in ww2. American jews wanted us involved for financial gain and to gain israel.
Soup, FDR died in 1945. In order for YOU to understand a politician’s lies, let us say you might be at least 20 years old. So if FDR lied to YOU, then you are now about 120 years old. I conclude, with high confidence, that FDR did not lie to YOU in any way.
Did FDR & Churchill tell lies as politicians? Of course… ALL politicians lie, in one way or another. [ You didn’t know ?? ]
Wilson said he would keep us out of war if elected. He lied, doughboys died. And yes, I am a 300 yr old vampire, so I heard him say it. . . . .😊
@MelvinNewcomb-m3g Hi Melvin. [It is an amusing to interact with yet another vampire.] Perhaps Wilson mentioned to you, over coffee or just a hand shake, that “he *_kept_* us out of the war” was his 1916 election campaign slogan, which was deliberately put in the past tense, not a future promise. Though I would agree that he was deceptive, an all too typical political trait. [I have been in a WWI underground hospital, and some surface trenches… yuk.]
Btw, did you happen to notice whether Wilson had stroke symptoms before going to Versailles? [Some have suggested that this may have prevented him from re-ordering Europe more thoroughly, which may have been the reason he committed troops in the first place (you know, aside from protecting the loans).]
[Note that I reflexively prefer semi democracies over irresponsible monarchies, unless given very sound reasons to do otherwise.]
ps I’m sorry you aren’t a little older; I would have asked if Isaac Newton was as grumpy as they say. Also, was Machiavelli really just joking? But alas, I’m still looking for a more mature vampire.
They will never teach this in schools. Instead, they use calculators from the first grade to disable thinking.
This video was very interesting up until 12 minutes
Then the big lies started!
What a coincidence! That's exactly when I stopped watching.
@Gesundheit888 Then propaganda starts
Words of wisdom war is good greed is good through war you create jobs manufacturing food supplies every product you can think make you richer.
There s a saiyng in my country During wars rich people provide money factories weapons and poor people there sons after the war the rich people refund there money factory retrurn there weapons and poor people burried there sons.
At the core of all this misery of WWII is the Versailles Treaty which was forced on Germany by Alliied politicians driven by hatred and revenge. Lloyd George is quoted with the following words: "Versailles is not a peace Treaty but rather an armistice foe 20 years."
I think that quote is by French Marshal Ferdinand Foch,
Read Article 23 in the Versailles treaty. It means Prohibition laws. Americans wrote it and put it also into the League of Nations Charter. By good psychology, the War Blame article was numbered 231, easy to focus on and ignore both Articles 23. Banning a commodity makes it sell for 4x as much, so by economic theory the act amounts to marketing--jacking up the price. So US actions in effect and outcome wrecked BOTH the US and German economies and caused 2 out of 4 Opium Wars.
It would be interesting to analyze the same system that led to WWI.
Paul Warburg was one of the creators of the Federal Reserve while on Jekyll Island. At the same time his brother Max Warburg was a powerful banker in Germany. 🇩🇪 That does not appear to be a coincidence to me.
Great lecture. I love this stuff. It brings clarity.
This is essentially what I was taught in high school 50 years ago. I don't know what is taught today. More detail here, but we learned about Ford for example.
Been teaching it without the antisemitic lean you see here for the last ten years.
And what was the ethnicity of these “ american “ bankers?
עם ישראל חי ❤ We will survive u. We are a civilization. U are a bunch of insecurities
When Italy, Germans, and Japan refused foreign loans and wanted their own country to own the debt was began
WELL RESEARCHED.
ABSOLUTELY TRUE. ❤
1/100 research
War is good for the economy (apparently).
The German Nation was forced to "repay" its debts to the USA, right up until 2010. Poland, which sits on 1/3 of Germanys former eastern lands, is not only the wealthiest country in Europe, it is also, thanks to the Obama administration, the most heavily armed country in Europe.
It's worth mentioning that Hjalmar Schacht, the banker mentioned at 14:10 of the video, opposed the production of armaments that would violate the Treaty of Versailles. He was also in contact with anti-Nazi organizations as early as 1938, he was held by the Nazis in a plot to assassinate Hitler, and wound up a prisoner at Dachau at one point. So while Schacht was a clever banker who helped Germany's economy, he was not a war-monger or an ardent Nazi, important points that the video leaves out.
Two major contributors to the start of 2WW:
a) treaty of Rapallo from 1922 between Soviet Union and Germany allowing commun secret development of mechanised war equipment essential for blitzkrieg,
b) paralel financing by international banking system of Soviet Union's military power.
Both documrnted by Anthony Sutton in his books like "National Suicide military aid to Soviet Union" and "Wall Street and Bolshevic Revolution"
USSR was the force that defeated 90% of Wermacht. It was blessing for the whole world that USSR modernized its economy and created powerful Red Army (and educated Soviet people so that they were able to crush Western bandit economy) before WW2.
@vyacheslavluchkin5317 Thank you to remind that fact !
IMHO Chamberlain telling Poles to end diplomacy with Germany caused WWII. How do you imagine things would have been different if Poland had traded Danzig for Silesia?
@gregorywade1559 Should Poland and Hitler come to agreement, Poland could escape war with Germany. But I think that Hitler would establish some tight control over Poland anyway and invaded USSR- he firmly believed that USSR is weak and desperately needed USSR resources (Hitler could receive these resources via usual economic cooperation and trade, but bandits hate to pay for something they can steal).
@vyacheslavluchkin5317 Blessing???
I'm sure we are seeing this happen now tbh.
How many other countries before than and after invaded for resources? Many of them and were doing it now.
Your AI can't even get Hitler's moustache right
I'll say. That really bothers me. 😬😂
For those interested in Germany's economic read "Web of Debt" by Ellen Brown. She points out that the currency Germany created was "sovereign". That loans did not incur payments to bankers, and went back to the state itself. This efficiency is not described in this video. The collapse of Germany was due to Hitler's insane winter time incursion into Russia and fighting armies on all its perimeter at the same time. He overextended Germany militarily and was defeated because of it.
Germany didn't have a choice. They attacked the Soviet Union simply because the Soviet Union was about to attack all of Europe. Read, 'The Chief Culprit,' by Victor Suvorov.
Excellent coverage. Professionally performed. Thank you.
America planned 3 world wars in 1871. Albert Pike FREEMASON
What?
@gearflut.1ENGLISH, PLAIN ENGLISH. WTF is your problem ?
Dumbarse American.@gearflut.1
@gearflut.1 its true they did and still do work for yehud rothschild dude japheth hasburgs happened.
Unfortunately, NOTHING HAS CHANGED!!!
boo hoo for poor Germany - the AGGRESSOR ! Yes, Europe did expect Germany to pay for what it did. This site would let serial kills out to kill again. Germany owed Europe every dime
" I looked at those mean children , and I saw why German started so many wars . And then I looked at those teachers , and I understood why they lost them all ".
I'm a bit confused about the 'what historians get wrong' part because this is exactly what I was taught in school and university in the 90ies. Only difference might be that a few company names have been added, but one or two. Is something different being taught somewhere else?
lookup "greatest story never told". even the German newspapers declared that Judah declared war on Germany. fill in the blanks.
No, But when you falsely claim no one is teaching it you attract a lot of conspiracy theorists.
They monetized the debt.
Are you sure it was broth?!? Not horse piss!?😂😅. Don't ask what the fermented stuff looked like. Exciting travel Jackson!
Thanks so much, and yes it is very serious and alarming!
Did you know the seven year war was the main reason for American Revolutionary War which was the main reason for French Revolution and Napoleonic war which was the main reason for collapse for HRE which resulted in Germany reunification which resulted in two alliances getting created(Germany Austria-Hungary and Italy vs France Uk and Russia) which resulted in ww1 which resulted in Russian revolution
So all wars are connected to each other
Don’t agree with your assessment at all.
@tomnelson203 Britain fought the 7 yrs war against France & blew up their debt. King George had to replenish UK coffers. He put the military & monetary squeeze on the 13 American Colonies which made a critical mass number of colonists say 'hell no & no more kings'. France's post-7 yr War economic situation was in the same dire debt boat. By 1789, when ppl were starving, a VERY large swath of the French common classes had enough & were ready to lay their lives on the line to overthrow their monarchy. W/out the French Revolution, Napoleon wouldn't have risen to power, etc, etc. It's a very simplified sketch of causations w/out any nitty gritty details, but I understand & see the through lines @gearflut laid out
Very interesting. My grandfathers both fought in WW2- both suffered different wounds. Very tragic and sad. Thank you.
And who exactly were those bankers and what tribe do they come from? Interesting thing to leave out.
Something beginning with R and end in othschild?
The tribe that controls you slaves 😅 and lives for free in your heads.
If All wars are bankere wars, who run bankers?
עם ישראל חי ❤ We will survive u. We are a civilization. U are a bunch of insecurities
I feel awful about buying that IBM PS1 in 1994. :(
Wait till you hear about the products everyone uses everyday that are created on the bones of modern slavery. It’s an evil world.
@diyaauntie yes like the mines in congo ur phones cobalt
Why didn’t you touch on the connection between DuPont and IG Farben? I’ve read that DuPont actually spied for the Nazis and was placed under house arrest during the war.
Also the German chemical company called Bayer, closely associated with I.G. Farbon and the eventual development of Zyclon B, which was used in the genocide of Jews, Christians, gays and many others.
The chemical company, du Pont, provided the tetra-ethyl lead that German aircraft needed to fly.
@raymondang9612the jet fuel addictive was pioneered by Koch brothers.
@D@DavesitsatthebeachChristians ? There was a group that committed genocide on millions of Christians. It wasn’t the Not See’s…
Economic crisis and the rise of fringe movements were always connected, back then and now. It's funny how people start to think strange things when desperation kicks in, and they see no future for their children.
It would be fair to know who's behind these AI videos. Who wrote the code, who trained it, with what resources, how were they obtained.
Put a little effort, you can easily check every information that is presented here and judge by yourself.
@TT-qv5wy I don't think you understand. I want to know WHO is behind these videos. The human being hiding behind AI.
@Tukemuth Since the latest repercussion from EU and America with sanction toward scholars, individuals, journalists, judges...making their lives living hell, everyone who speak the truth will hide. Google Jacques Baud, four judges of the International Criminal Court, UN Francesca Albanese...
Interesting thoughts but the pictures are hilarious!
I hate AI. Everything is AI
The hollow cost has been debunked
The AI pics are terrible!
Historians did not misunderstand anything, but what they always knew could not be made public because Western governments and media did not allow it, some truths are unpleasant and others are very important, so even today it is very important for them that the definition of the Holocaust from Wikipedia is under such videos. America did not liberate Europe, but made war on Europe, what was called liberation is the occupation of territory for future domination and business. Hitler was defeated by Russia, which lost 27 million people in that battle. 9 out of 10 German soldiers died on the Eastern Front.
Henry Ford wrote in 1920s that there was a Jewish conspiracy to take over America '.
How did he know a century ago??!!
Read The International Jew and find out!
Looks like you've got another Hitler instead
Not really a conspiracy. More like a particularly acquisitive and intelligent group setting their eyes on a rich prize.
Jews make up a sizeable percentage of billionaires ,bankers, lawyer’s, politicians ,doctors and entertainers ,wherever they exist.
The Rothschilds have immense power and influence even after 150 years. Thats not conspiracy. Thats fact.
@WaryofExtremes-OriginalTorah was written 600bce. A thousand years after the events were said to have happened.
@WaryofExtremes-Original Their real Bible is the Talmud, which contains explicit instructions of how to take over the world, you don't need armies, just control how the armies are paid!
The last bit about the money is 100% speculative. Very sneaky
Britain started WW1 and WW2