Thank you for the information and excellent work! When you used the process with Gimp, you needed to turn off the negative image. This probably why it looked different from the others. Why do you use image-r dpi at 320 and Gimp at 600dpi? Would it be more comparable to have the same dpi? Again, thank you for your video and excellent work!!!
Using a higher dpi before exporting the image from gimp or imgr produces a better graphic. Using 320 in Lightburn keeps a good image quality but allows the image to engrave faster.
I dont know what I would do without your videos. I just did my first canvas today and its running at the moment and looks good so far! And P.S. Horse lover here too. We have Gypsies :)
So you are just basically double processing it once with gimp(newspaper) and once with lightburn(jarvis) ? If I'm understanding you correctly, then it seems that someone who has the abilty, needs to make a better algorithm that combines these two?
Somewhat. It’s not exactly double processing. The newsprint option that the gimp plug-in applies does not yield great results as is using passthrough. I’m simply leaving the image as is just choosing Jarvis as the result is better. I’m not adjusting the image in Lightburn other than the image mode.
@@wtwtx the jarvis image mode in Lightburn is actually processing the image again, similarly to how imagr does. That's also why the two imagr ones look very similar to each other. For the gimp PT one, I think you should have selected negative image. You don't need to for Imagr as it makes the image negative while processing, it seems like Lightburn's native processing (jarvis, stucky, etc.) also makes it negative by default as well, but PT does not. You should give the grayscale image type a try for imag-r-processed images, I think you'll really like the results. It is a little tougher to get the right max/min power settings down, but I usually do a test canvas alongside any actual canvas I am doing so I can dial each in.
Sometimes I forget, bring pic in from Imagr and dont pass through and it comes out better..also it seems everytime I bring in black tile image from imagr, I have to also click negative in lightburn
You do a great job with these videos. No skipped steps and a great job of explaining as you go along. Thanks!
Thank you, I appreciate that. I’m for sure not a RUclipsr so glad to hear they are helpful
Thank you for the information and excellent work!
When you used the process with Gimp, you needed to turn off the negative image. This probably why it looked different from the others.
Why do you use image-r dpi at 320 and Gimp at 600dpi? Would it be more comparable to have the same dpi?
Again, thank you for your video and excellent work!!!
Using a higher dpi before exporting the image from gimp or imgr produces a better graphic. Using 320 in Lightburn keeps a good image quality but allows the image to engrave faster.
I dont know what I would do without your videos. I just did my first canvas today and its running at the moment and looks good so far! And P.S. Horse lover here too. We have Gypsies :)
Glad they have helped.
you make it simple for us so we can easily understand it. No words Really Amazing Well done.
I appreciate the great feedback, thank you.
You should include an image done directly in Light Burn for comparison.
That’s already been done by a few people. This video came from requests to compare using and not using passthrough.
So you are just basically double processing it once with gimp(newspaper) and once with lightburn(jarvis) ? If I'm understanding you correctly, then it seems that someone who has the abilty, needs to make a better algorithm that combines these two?
Somewhat. It’s not exactly double processing. The newsprint option that the gimp plug-in applies does not yield great results as is using passthrough. I’m simply leaving the image as is just choosing Jarvis as the result is better. I’m not adjusting the image in Lightburn other than the image mode.
@@wtwtx the jarvis image mode in Lightburn is actually processing the image again, similarly to how imagr does. That's also why the two imagr ones look very similar to each other. For the gimp PT one, I think you should have selected negative image. You don't need to for Imagr as it makes the image negative while processing, it seems like Lightburn's native processing (jarvis, stucky, etc.) also makes it negative by default as well, but PT does not. You should give the grayscale image type a try for imag-r-processed images, I think you'll really like the results. It is a little tougher to get the right max/min power settings down, but I usually do a test canvas alongside any actual canvas I am doing so I can dial each in.
@@adjbuzz Thanks for the input, I'll have to give that a try.
Sometimes I forget, bring pic in from Imagr and dont pass through and it comes out better..also it seems everytime I bring in black tile image from imagr, I have to also click negative in lightburn
I rarely use pass through if I set the image up in imagr. I will typically change to Jarvis, set dpi to 320 and it comes out better.