Having this explanation as a first lesson in calculus would be a great boon to any student! Nice work Parth. I am certainly interested in more Legendre discussion from here. 🙏
Thanks for explanation about basic concept in derivative. I really enjoy watch this video and have a new perspective about understanding the concept. If we understand the meaning of every equation, I think physics is fun to study. 😅 Again, thanks for your video Mr. Parth. Keep up the good work. I'm the new subscriber here. 🙏
Hello there, i am an engineering student from India. You are like a God to me that i hadn't understood any of the Maxwell equations explained in our college but i saw your playlist, they are awesome. Thank you very much sir 😊.
Hey Path. I'm a physics student in my third year. I'm struggling a little with my statistical mechanics course. Could you make a video about the partition functions Z and Q?
At 11:47, I got got stuck on the RHS (Right-Hand Side) of the eq. I saw the time derivative of something that already had a time derivative, q_dot.. It made me think that it might relate to the second partial derivative of q-space, acceleration. But I don't know if diferenciation (sp) distributes over multiplication, like it does over addition.
_Parth ...Grateful to learn from you...👌...I Request you to do a video on Lorentz and Gauge Invariance in detail... because it holds remarkable space in physics_ *I request the above by 2nd time... previously in previous video*
@@bon12121 If we need something we have to ask...who else will ask...?...it's a kind of respect we are giving to the educator, who shares his/her perspective.
Sir, In the book introduction to electrodynamics, 3rd edition (Griffiths), is stated that figure 1.18 c indicates a positive divergence. Could you please explain this in the context of your video about the first Maxwell equation.
Huh. They are all zero normed split-complex (or hyperbolic quaternion) derivatives, ||∂u/(∂x/c+j ∂t)||=0 where j²=1? That suggests a few things to me: First, ∂u could be the norm of a split-complex (or hyperbolic quaternion) value which could give you are more complicated (and possibly interesting) form of these equations without that norm. Second, mapping to Euclidean space-time would give you a non-zero norm and a zero proper time interval? That implies the wave is moving at the causal limit, c, right? That's the only circumstance under which 𝛼(v) ∂t = 0 where Lorentz's 𝛼(v)=√(1-v²/c²). Either that or ∂u is constant with repect to ∂𝜏, which it would have to be if ∂𝜏=0 but wouldn't *necessarily* need to be true otherwise. Except 𝜏 and t aren't independent parameters of the function u. Third, it implies ∂u/∂x is the derivative of ∂u/∂t with respect to 𝜃=Arg(∂u/(∂x/c+j ∂t)) and vice versa due to the relationship between cosh 𝜃 and sinh 𝜃.
How can i contact you about a research I am conducting requiring your input? I am far from a physicist or scientist in the telluric field but I am an expert in cosmology and would love your input on something of an unconventional nature. Thank you.
@@real_michael as good as you need to be at integration (you get some pretty nasty functions sometimes), its not so much multiple integrals but just all the properties of all the different forms that ODEs can come in. For first orders we learned: separation of variables which is pretty intuitive, exact method, "by integrating factor" (idk if thats the proper name), bernoulli, riccati, and other misc subs. For higher order derivatives, we actually only did linear eqns and for that we did undetermined coefficients, trial sln y = e^\lambda x, euler sub x = e^t, variation of parameters, and more. rn we're doing systems of odes which is like the above but like vectors kinda sorta as far as i get it now. i had to know a bit about lin alg although i havent taken it in regards to linear independence, determinants (the wronskian), matrix multiplication, linear operators (D operator), and condition?/property? of a singular matrix. also had to know euler's identity the e^itheta one like the back of hand. next we do the laplace transform which im excited for! i hope you enjoy the class next semester!
Live that you’re doing more mathematical topics! Keep it up
Having this explanation as a first lesson in calculus would be a great boon to any student! Nice work Parth.
I am certainly interested in more Legendre discussion from here. 🙏
Parth back at it again hell yeah! 🔥
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thanks for explanation about basic concept in derivative. I really enjoy watch this video and have a new perspective about understanding the concept.
If we understand the meaning of every equation, I think physics is fun to study. 😅
Again, thanks for your video Mr. Parth. Keep up the good work. I'm the new subscriber here.
🙏
This is great helpfully
Hello there, i am an engineering student from India. You are like a God to me that i hadn't understood any of the Maxwell equations explained in our college but i saw your playlist, they are awesome. Thank you very much sir 😊.
If you like these kinds of videos then try also Mithuna's channel called "Looking Glass Universe".
Hey Path. I'm a physics student in my third year. I'm struggling a little with my statistical mechanics course. Could you make a video about the partition functions Z and Q?
I second this. Hope he makes one.
I live your videos where you explain mathematical terms. Also could you maybe look into doing a video about the 2022 Nobel prize for physics?
Would love to know more about wormwholes and the theory behind it from you
I love Lagrangian mechanics, it's so simple even though it has absolutely no right to
to be WHAT?
@@azzteke misstyped lol
@@davidurban528 lol what was it you mistyped?
"to be
WHAT???" 😅
What do you think about making a video about operators in shrodinger equation, how to deal with them in this?
I like to see that at some point in the future!
i think you should also mentioned the total differential
Bro, I like this mustache on you. Looks good 👍
At 11:47, I got got stuck on the RHS (Right-Hand Side) of the eq. I saw the time derivative of something that already had a time derivative, q_dot.. It made me think that it might relate to the second partial derivative of q-space, acceleration. But I don't know if diferenciation (sp) distributes over multiplication, like it does over addition.
Didn't you learn the product rule??
❤❤❤ So helpful.
So you never have d2t in the denominator, right. And dt2 is not a square in any way, just a notation. Thanks for confirming.
Very well done mate
_Parth ...Grateful to learn from you...👌...I Request you to do a video on Lorentz and Gauge Invariance in detail... because it holds remarkable space in physics_
*I request the above by 2nd time... previously in previous video*
This is the first time I request you to cease requesting.
@@bon12121 If we need something we have to ask...who else will ask...?...it's a kind of respect we are giving to the educator, who shares his/her perspective.
Always love your content
Amazing content!
Hey Parth... Love your videos❤ Could you do one about Bhabha Scattering?
just voting for more on Euler-Lagrange ... plus all the physicsy stuff others have requested here. thanks.
Nice video 😊
Sir, In the book introduction to electrodynamics, 3rd edition (Griffiths), is stated that
figure 1.18 c indicates a positive divergence. Could you please explain this in the context of your video about the first Maxwell equation.
Yes, make the vid, make me happy
Huh. They are all zero normed split-complex (or hyperbolic quaternion) derivatives, ||∂u/(∂x/c+j ∂t)||=0 where j²=1?
That suggests a few things to me:
First, ∂u could be the norm of a split-complex (or hyperbolic quaternion) value which could give you are more complicated (and possibly interesting) form of these equations without that norm.
Second, mapping to Euclidean space-time would give you a non-zero norm and a zero proper time interval? That implies the wave is moving at the causal limit, c, right? That's the only circumstance under which 𝛼(v) ∂t = 0 where Lorentz's 𝛼(v)=√(1-v²/c²). Either that or ∂u is constant with repect to ∂𝜏, which it would have to be if ∂𝜏=0 but wouldn't *necessarily* need to be true otherwise. Except 𝜏 and t aren't independent parameters of the function u.
Third, it implies ∂u/∂x is the derivative of ∂u/∂t with respect to 𝜃=Arg(∂u/(∂x/c+j ∂t)) and vice versa due to the relationship between cosh 𝜃 and sinh 𝜃.
How can i contact you about a research I am conducting requiring your input? I am far from a physicist or scientist in the telluric field but I am an expert in cosmology and would love your input on something of an unconventional nature. Thank you.
I'm currently learning partial derivatives in calculus 3 and it's surprisingly easy
the struggle is the partial differential equations. my calc 4 class here is ordinary differential equations, and that's plenty complicated right now
@@ekt2656 yeah I'll be taking different equations next semester if I pass my cal 3 course. Is multiple integration difficult?
@@real_michael as good as you need to be at integration (you get some pretty nasty functions sometimes), its not so much multiple integrals but just all the properties of all the different forms that ODEs can come in. For first orders we learned: separation of variables which is pretty intuitive, exact method, "by integrating factor" (idk if thats the proper name), bernoulli, riccati, and other misc subs. For higher order derivatives, we actually only did linear eqns and for that we did undetermined coefficients, trial sln y = e^\lambda x, euler sub x = e^t, variation of parameters, and more. rn we're doing systems of odes which is like the above but like vectors kinda sorta as far as i get it now.
i had to know a bit about lin alg although i havent taken it in regards to linear independence, determinants (the wronskian), matrix multiplication, linear operators (D operator), and condition?/property? of a singular matrix. also had to know euler's identity the e^itheta one like the back of hand.
next we do the laplace transform which im excited for!
i hope you enjoy the class next semester!
@@real_michael NO.
Thank you !
Can u make conceptual videos on stat mech?
Please ✔️ few words more on x=Beta.t^3 ❓️ at 2:56
I am 13 years old and I need to solve Schrodinger equation and wave function in mathematical form can you do it in mathematical form
Hey, you have a beautiful moustache, I suspect it's inspired by Ram from RRR...
No - inspired by Paul Dirac or Louis de Broglie or maybe even Renee Descartes. Who knows.
Show Us The QUIRKS! Show Us The QUIRKS!
Today only I start this chapter
10:03 Should have used different coefficients.
I thought video contain Legendre polynomial ,
How to ask you a question on physics? what is your contact email?