Ace city it has been debunked several times by a number of people ... this doesn’t prove earths rotation ... do your research and you can debunk it yourself ... you don’t want to find the answers though you want to trust government education www.science.gov
Very interesting. Thank you very much. I'm surprised why we may detect so tiny angular movements and not able to detect the motion of the Earth around the sun with the same technique (Michelson-Moreley). Has somebody the answer ?
They can measure a slight tilt but can't measure the Earth's spin?😄 Like Buzz Aldrin says maybe we didn't go to the Moon, maybe the Earth's not spinning?🤔😉
Why do I get a frequency shift resulting in a beating? Shouldn't the longer/shorter way just lead to a constant phase shift resulting in a constant amount of destrucitve/constructive interference?
You made me look for the quote and you lied. He didn't refer to rotation at all. He said Earth movement as in being in linear motion... Or that it could never be a device to detect that... So jumping to Earth rotating is disingenuous. He was very aware of Earth rotation and we had devices to prove it while he was still alive. Learn more before you speak garbage .. and stop misquoting Einstein.
@@individualone courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2016/Winter/physics2d/einsteinonrelativity.pdf This is a scanned excerpt with the quote in question being on page two. It's clear that this motion in question was referring to movement through a hypothesized ether that was demonstrated to not exist in the Michelson Morley experiment. Also it is clearly stated on page one that these passages are translations of notes taken in Japanese that were hand written by an observer watching the speech in German. It's very likely that translation errors occurred somewhere that led to some of the quote being altered.
I guess you mean the 0:17 video? It was likely captured from geosynchronous orbit, or stabilized to the clouds and horizon (the segment was only a few seconds and was zooming). Many weather and communication satellites are in geosynchronous orbits such that they don't move relative to the ground. DSCOVR EPIC instead sits at a point between the Earth and Sun, always providing a view of the day side. It's also possible to amplify and extrapolate motion in video. In short; they didn't stop the earth, and though I don't know the precise method used for that snippet, I can think of a few really cool ways to produce such a clip.
@@0LoneTech And how do you know it's from a satellite, how do you know it's orbit is geosynchronous? Orb it. They just started geosynchronous orbits in 1960, where are the photographs of Antarctica? No pictures of that huh? No video? Isn't the atmos spinning with the earth? Meanwhile, clouds traverse the skies at their own pace and surface winds blow in every direction at their own speed. They didn't stop the earth because it isn't moving. Does this look familiar? ruclips.net/video/2ikg2IkuLmg/видео.html
@@Amanlikeme Oh, I see you're into absurd conspiracy theories, not actually curious. Most of what you said didn't make sense. Turns out I meant to say geostationary, but that's just a special case of geosynchronous anyway. Geostationary satellites are only above the equator and can't see Antarctica very well (himawari8.nict.go.jp/ shows how much of it they see). The atmosphere is by and large spinning with the Earth, but it's not perfectly uniform and laminar. It's a fairly chaotic but very thin layer, proportionally speaking.
@@0LoneTech I wonder why they call it, geostationary? You don't have any surface winds going in all directions at different speeds? Clouds don't traverse the earth at their own paces? Yet the atmos is velcroed to a spinning earth? At 1000 mph, 15 degrees an hour? What is this picture you've sent me, I see what it is. How big is Australia? It's to big. What's above it? Antarctica can't be seen well that far out? I should see Antarctica a lot better than we do.
Surface winds are largely affected by local topology and pressure shifts. Clouds are in the air, and move along with it. The atmosphere isn't exactly "velcroed" to the solid bits, but it does get stirred by them if they diverge in speed, and it was all spinning along in the same direction in the first place; we can observe this across most of the solar system. You may want to rewind the Himawari 8 picture to daytime, by the way. And Australia isn't "too big"; you're just assuming a full disc image would be the full width of the planet. That's not the case because of a little thing we call perspective; the visible surface of Earth only reaches to the horizon, which in this image happens to be visibly circular. The satellite is a long way up, but Earth is huge. ruclips.net/video/mxhxL1LzKww/видео.html
You mean like Bob Knodel's laser gyro?? "one of the people in the community actually purchased one for $20,000 but what we found is is when we turned on that gyroscope we found that we were picking up a drift a 15-degree per hour drift" . Video on my channel. Thanks, Bob.
@@boterlettersukkel That essentially is the working principle of this method featured in this video. Just on a much smaller scale, and not nearly as much precision for the standard ring-laser gyroscope that aircraft use.
it took me 2 weeks to figure out why this thing keeps giving out these kinds of readings..SIMPLE! it was programmed to reset every hour to go back or forward 15 degrees..just like all electronic instrument it can be programmed
Lmao instead of accepting the result for what it was,and admitting you were wrong ,you spent 2 weeks trying to explain it away. The length you flat earthers would go to not admit you're full of shit.
I actually don't know how the earth was made, and I thought about it while I paused it, because I had never really thought about it. I got it right because that's how stars form; large gas clouds falling under their own gravity and as it get smaller like a ballerina pulling it's arms in, it spins faster, as well as black holes, and I was like hmm that's how the earth was probably made. i don't know, I was just proud I got it right XDD
Thanks Bob! (I would never search for this without him)
A.. 15 degree per hour drift.
a 15 degree per hour drift
Thanks, Bob
It is supposed to be accurate because, as they say, it is a laser, and yet it has drift !!
Thanks Bob
Thanks, Bob!
about time sagnac effect was done on a larger scale
will be interesting science
There have been many Sagnac effect measurements on larger scales. Michelson-Gale was MUCH larger.
Here's a short list:
mctoon.net/spin
No need, globeboster has already prove the spin with a laser gyro
Yes,he heve,but this is not to prove it,it is to check for any anomalies in Earth's rotation
And..? That's not even what they're checking for with this technology.
Sorry guys just wanted to insert globeboster fail reference
@@fredericgadoury6610
don’t *EVER* feel sorry for that, pal!
😃👍
17 Dislikes = only 17 'Flat Earthers' have done their own reseach!
I would like to see flat earthers debunk this one 🤔
IT Is JUsT LasERstiVE,EaRTh Is FlAth
*joke*
Ace city it has been debunked several times by a number of people ... this doesn’t prove earths rotation ... do your research and you can debunk it yourself ... you don’t want to find the answers though you want to trust government education www.science.gov
@@akademiks1090 cant you use a 20k gyro ?
@@Dazza83 They did...
and found a 15° per hour drift - Thanks Bob!
Organic Life optical gyroscopes have not been debunked. Flat earthers are just uneducated science deniers. Denying unwanted results is not debunking.
Lasers on your ring.
Is it me or this alone dismantles the theory of relativity? If your not satisfied yet, how about rotating a Michelson interferometer vertically?
Brilliant. Thanks for the upload.
Very interesting. Thank you very much. I'm surprised why we may detect so tiny angular movements and not able to detect the motion of the Earth around the sun with the same technique (Michelson-Moreley). Has somebody the answer ?
I think you would weight ever so slightly less in the night but it’s such a small difference I don’t think we would be able to measure it
That's really clever
But isn't the laser dangerous and a voracious consumer of energy ?
@@yakut9876 Ask the ones in your CD and DVD players.
Flat Earth brought you here.
wow great video
So how long is a day? If not 24 hours, not 23 hours and 56 minutes, then how many seconds more, how many milliseconds more?
It actually varies. The wikipedia article on leap seconds might be a good place to start studying this.
23h56m is sidereal day.
Precise dimensions can not be obtained with burying precious equipment underground. That is totally nonsense
How is it totally nonsense? Where is your conclusive proof that this doesn't work?
This could probably detect the rotation of the Earth around the Sun too.
They can measure a slight tilt but can't measure the Earth's spin?😄 Like Buzz Aldrin says maybe we didn't go to the Moon, maybe the Earth's not spinning?🤔😉
Bob knodel detected a 15° an hour drift, that proves movement...
When did Buzz Aldrin say that we maybe didn't go to the moon? Or are you just taking a quote of his completely out of context?
@@RazgrizXMG0079
No way...
Do you actually think a flerf would take something out of context?
😎
checkmate flat earthers.
The link is a 404 for me
For me too.
Thanks for letting us know-- it should work now.
@@ScienceMagazine And what did flat earthers prove? A… 15 degree per hour drift. Thanks Bob
Why do I get a frequency shift resulting in a beating?
Shouldn't the longer/shorter way just lead to a constant phase shift resulting in a constant amount of destrucitve/constructive interference?
nerd alert 🤣
Beats me.
So I guess Einstien was wrong? He said earth rotation couldn't be detected hmmmm weird 👀?
Did he?
@@florin604 yea... that's when he came up with relativity!
You made me look for the quote and you lied. He didn't refer to rotation at all. He said Earth movement as in being in linear motion... Or that it could never be a device to detect that... So jumping to Earth rotating is disingenuous. He was very aware of Earth rotation and we had devices to prove it while he was still alive. Learn more before you speak garbage .. and stop misquoting Einstein.
@@individualone courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2016/Winter/physics2d/einsteinonrelativity.pdf This is a scanned excerpt with the quote in question being on page two. It's clear that this motion in question was referring to movement through a hypothesized ether that was demonstrated to not exist in the Michelson Morley experiment. Also it is clearly stated on page one that these passages are translations of notes taken in Japanese that were hand written by an observer watching the speech in German. It's very likely that translation errors occurred somewhere that led to some of the quote being altered.
@@travisbeagle5691 so basically you believe that we can measure earth movement and those measurements would not be compromised by earth rotation?👀?
How did they get the spinning earth to stop spinning while they took the video of the tornado spinning?
I guess you mean the 0:17 video? It was likely captured from geosynchronous orbit, or stabilized to the clouds and horizon (the segment was only a few seconds and was zooming). Many weather and communication satellites are in geosynchronous orbits such that they don't move relative to the ground. DSCOVR EPIC instead sits at a point between the Earth and Sun, always providing a view of the day side. It's also possible to amplify and extrapolate motion in video. In short; they didn't stop the earth, and though I don't know the precise method used for that snippet, I can think of a few really cool ways to produce such a clip.
@@0LoneTech And how do you know it's from a satellite, how do you know it's orbit is geosynchronous? Orb it. They just started geosynchronous orbits in 1960, where are the photographs of Antarctica? No pictures of that huh? No video? Isn't the atmos spinning with the earth? Meanwhile, clouds traverse the skies at their own pace and surface winds blow in every direction at their own speed. They didn't stop the earth because it isn't moving. Does this look familiar? ruclips.net/video/2ikg2IkuLmg/видео.html
@@Amanlikeme Oh, I see you're into absurd conspiracy theories, not actually curious. Most of what you said didn't make sense. Turns out I meant to say geostationary, but that's just a special case of geosynchronous anyway. Geostationary satellites are only above the equator and can't see Antarctica very well (himawari8.nict.go.jp/ shows how much of it they see). The atmosphere is by and large spinning with the Earth, but it's not perfectly uniform and laminar. It's a fairly chaotic but very thin layer, proportionally speaking.
@@0LoneTech I wonder why they call it, geostationary? You don't have any surface winds going in all directions at different speeds? Clouds don't traverse the earth at their own paces? Yet the atmos is velcroed to a spinning earth? At 1000 mph, 15 degrees an hour? What is this picture you've sent me, I see what it is. How big is Australia? It's to big. What's above it? Antarctica can't be seen well that far out? I should see Antarctica a lot better than we do.
Surface winds are largely affected by local topology and pressure shifts. Clouds are in the air, and move along with it. The atmosphere isn't exactly "velcroed" to the solid bits, but it does get stirred by them if they diverge in speed, and it was all spinning along in the same direction in the first place; we can observe this across most of the solar system. You may want to rewind the Himawari 8 picture to daytime, by the way. And Australia isn't "too big"; you're just assuming a full disc image would be the full width of the planet. That's not the case because of a little thing we call perspective; the visible surface of Earth only reaches to the horizon, which in this image happens to be visibly circular. The satellite is a long way up, but Earth is huge.
ruclips.net/video/mxhxL1LzKww/видео.html
ILLUMUNATI REALNESS =)
More like laser realness
How about some independently verifiable evidence of earth's spin? Why isn't there any?
You mean like Bob Knodel's laser gyro??
"one of the people in the community
actually purchased one for $20,000 but what we found is is when we turned on
that gyroscope we found that we were picking up a drift a 15-degree per hour drift" .
Video on my channel.
Thanks, Bob.
@@boterlettersukkel That essentially is the working principle of this method featured in this video. Just on a much smaller scale, and not nearly as much precision for the standard ring-laser gyroscope that aircraft use.
it took me 2 weeks to figure out why this thing keeps giving out these kinds of readings..SIMPLE! it was programmed to reset every hour to go back or forward 15 degrees..just like all electronic instrument it can be programmed
Or.. the earth is rotating you know. Your buddy Bob made the same test. I don't think he 'programmed' his gyro 😂
seeker jay Go build your own gyro then.
Lmao instead of accepting the result for what it was,and admitting you were wrong ,you spent 2 weeks trying to explain it away. The length you flat earthers would go to not admit you're full of shit.
Seeker Jay went seeking for an ad-hoc excuse and found one. 😂😂😂
Alternatively, you’re wrong and full of shit, like all flatwits and reality-deniers.
I actually don't know how the earth was made, and I thought about it while I paused it, because I had never really thought about it.
I got it right because that's how stars form; large gas clouds falling under their own gravity and as it get smaller like a ballerina pulling it's arms in, it spins faster, as well as black holes, and I was like hmm that's how the earth was probably made. i don't know, I was just proud I got it right XDD
Ever look at a star through a Nikon p1000? You'd question everything satan, the anagram of nasa was peddling.
bulshit ,calibrate it first for function.
TRy again.
Bring *EVIDENCE* .
@@boterlettersukkel ruclips.net/video/8IYkisyOZvs/видео.html
@@tesla1961 So, this works to detect rotation
@@boterlettersukkel no rotation tommy.
@@tesla1961 Explain how a mechanical gyro compass works, loser.
Pure bs
Arguments from personal incredulity and ignorance have no value.
Stop the bs please
Thanks Bob