The truth value of a conditional statement is not dependent on the truth values of its constituents, only how they relate to one another. 6 times out of 7, it is not Monday, but regardless of weather "today is Monday" is true, it follows that when it is Monday, it will be Tuesday. On Saturdays, the statement "tomorrow is Sunday" is true, but it as a conclusion does not follow from the condition "today is Monday", so the overall statement is false. In the third statement, there is no causal connection between dogs having 3 heads, and dogs flying; the conclusion does not follow from the premise, therefore it is false. It's just as easy to imagine a hypothetical where dogs have 3 heads and fly as one where dogs have 3 heads and don't. In the fourth statement, the conclusion is something that is true in all conditions, regardless of their truth values, and thus it is overall true. Even if hypothetically, sharks walked on land, 1+1 would still be 2.
What about for multiple conclusions? For example, "If the sky is green, then birds can swim and cats can fly." So, as long as the first hypothesis is false, the truth value of a conditional will always be true?
dude thank you so much we need more tutorials like this STRAIGHT TO THE POINTT
Thx, i needed this
This actually helped me do my homework thx bro.
This is the only video I've found that has helped me😂 thank you!
Nice!
This is a superb explanation. It made the topic easier to understand.
Thank you, you explained this very well. You made me understand.
Thanks Ramon sir for make this video.👍☺️
The truth value of a conditional statement is not dependent on the truth values of its constituents, only how they relate to one another. 6 times out of 7, it is not Monday, but regardless of weather "today is Monday" is true, it follows that when it is Monday, it will be Tuesday. On Saturdays, the statement "tomorrow is Sunday" is true, but it as a conclusion does not follow from the condition "today is Monday", so the overall statement is false. In the third statement, there is no causal connection between dogs having 3 heads, and dogs flying; the conclusion does not follow from the premise, therefore it is false. It's just as easy to imagine a hypothetical where dogs have 3 heads and fly as one where dogs have 3 heads and don't. In the fourth statement, the conclusion is something that is true in all conditions, regardless of their truth values, and thus it is overall true. Even if hypothetically, sharks walked on land, 1+1 would still be 2.
Thanks
What if the dog is Cerberus and it can fly? 😂✌️
Thanks teacher this actually helped me
What about for multiple conclusions? For example, "If the sky is green, then birds can swim and cats can fly." So, as long as the first hypothesis is false, the truth value of a conditional will always be true?
Yeah buddy!
@@rawmath Cool, thanks!
Great
THANK YOU!!!!!!!
this helped me!
Wet happy to hear that 😀
What if you used other conjunctions? Don't just use then
how about this? If 4 < 3, then 7 = 8.
It has no connection but both are false.
lol ok it's obviously true haha i was just sleepy & confused
If, then
ur voice is so hot
thanks so much