“Has it ever struck you that life is all memory, except for the one present moment that goes by you so quick you hardly catch it going?”― Tennessee Williams
@@stevelowe2647 An interesting fact about Memory, I had a rather significant stroke a few years ago, one of the things its left me with is tracking short time memory loss, my consultant explained to me that the part of my brain that is damaged is the bit that records and stores things properly as they happen, (we'll call this the short time box) its incredibly frustrating tbh, its a bit like someone pressing the pause button on and off very briefly, short time memories are then condensed and stored in a different part of the brain (long term box) as long time memory, so when you remember something from say years ago, the brain takes that memory out again, gives it a dust down, then puts it in the short time memory box, then condenses it again and puts it back in the long term memory box, so when you remember something it is just from the last time you remembered it, even from years ago. Now Deja vu is a slight short circuit in the brain when it briefly puts bits of short term tracking memory in the long term memory box , this confuses the brain so it tries to take it back out again (repair the short circuit if you like) and put it back in the short time tracking box, this then makes you think your remembering something that has already happened before, which hasn't, its just now remembering the last time you remembered it, which was a split second ago when the brain was flitting it between the two memory boxes, I now have around 20 of these a day, because my short term tracking memory box is damaged by my stroke, this leads to a lot of confusion and false memories when I remember things I have not said or done and vice versa (which is why my wife needs to control and monitor all my medication. .. Now, I hope I have remembered all that correctly..but who can tell, not me that's for sure 🤣
@Son Of Cherve Im not even gonna answer that. But if you truly believe they had the know how to to send men to the moon and return them, alive, there is something wrong with you. They just went to space and came back. It was all planned to win the space war against the Soviet Union. Why are there no successive missions? After all the technology we have now..
@Son Of Cherve This is the same country that refuses to tell the truth about 9/11, and the gulf of Tonkin accident which resulted in the vietnam war. USA has a history of covering enormous things up. So yes, I wouldnt be surprised if the moon landings were a hoax.
@@tamarafletcher7965 No, it wouldn't. You're not thinking critically. When filming a movie, nobody is pretending that what they're filming is real. Your supposed _Apollo_ film set wouldn't have that luxury. The people involved would need to actually pay for all the supposed _Apollo_ equipment (even if it didn't work), and _then_ pay extra for the film set and VFX. Another thing you're missing is that _Apollo_ footage isn't like your typical film - it's shot with one camera in a continuous manner, with no cuts. _Another_ thing you're not considering is the fidelity of the supposed VFXs, which Hollywood is still unable to match _to this very day_ using purely practical effects.
I remember being allowed to stay up late to Watch this...(I'm in the U.K.) I was only 8, but I remember it like it was yesterday, but landing Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the Moon wasn't the most remarkable thing they did....That was getting them Back again..and Alive !! ....Marvellous 😊
@Alvino A LOL, i didn't even see the answer to poor Coldeb, but I was sure sure sure, that a MORON would answer something and BINGO !!!!! Thanks for sharing making an idiot of yourself! Please watch the film again, there's something you missed boy! :D :D :D Oh, and go back to school and do your science homework please!
@Alvino A it's not that people don't question. It's that people like you dont want to see the evidence. If you REALLY cared to fact check the moon landing, you would be searching Google for answers, not on RUclips.
I was 14, looking over my mother's shoulder and chastising her for believing in only what she saw as she was glued to the Television. T V was her God, but I told her it was a ridiculous hoax, and she was nuts to be sucked in to such a mere concocted show. I'm sure she was mad as hell, because she was a tax payer, and didn't want to be duped.
@@harrietharlow9929 Did you know Neil Armstrong cocked that line up..he was supposed to say..”That’s one small step far a man” etc etc, …but I suppose we can forgive him, what with all the excitement and all 😂
I just discovered a long time family friend was an engineer at North American Aviation during the 60s. He had some amazing stories about the rush to the moon!
@@mathieutyler00 I agree they can’t even figure out to go through the radiation belt today let alone 50+ years ago. It’s all BS. The belt is 25,000 miles thick
@@A10Jedi Hi A, hope that you are well. You wrote "They can’t even figure out to go through the radiation belt today let alone 50+ years ago". I assume that you are referring to the Van Allen Belt. To put your mind at ease here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable." Interestingly these radiation belts will still provide a challenge for the Artemis missions both in terms of choosing a trajectory through them and shielding not only for the crew but for the electronics and guidance systems. The modern electronics and IC's used in Orion are much more sensitive to radiation damage and interference than the electronics used in the Apollo Program. Take care.
@Dashing Johnny Too bad there are so many people who don't understand enough physics and technology to realize the moon landings were not a hoax. Only 6% of the population have been stupified by conspiracy videos that have been proven thousnads of times to be all false information.
@@jonathanzimmer8143 Jonathan, don't forget the Earth is FLAT :D :D :D :D No Moon landing, 5g and covid19, flat earth.... wow... Why is there so many dumb people on this planet????
" Ven der rockets go up, who cares where they come down ? That's not my department", says Werner Von Braun - Tom Lehrer, "Werner Von Braun" Thanks for the wonderful musical memories Professor Lehrer
SierraThunder Yes...Thankfully we now land the boosters...Blue Origin and Space X were the first to land booster cores.,but the technology and software was spun off NASA's Surveyor,Mars Apollo LM,lander programs
Heroes of the Human Race are the astronauts and cosmonauts that paved the way for our understanding of space and exploration through man spaceflights, a legacy that's still alive today.
Hopefully one day soon people will understand that everything is in space. It's just that some parts of space have more stuff in them than do other parts of space.
I think it would have been appropriate to mention also that Russia and Gagarin took to space earlier and that this must have added pressure and resolve to the program.
You're right... A brief mention of those incredible achievements by the soviet union would have fit nicely within the scope of this documentary. Those milestones made first by our former WWII Allie (but sadly by this time had become our cold war rival) was literally the spark that lit the fuse under President Kennedy and thrust us headlong into the space race and uncharted waters. I honestly think had it not been for the early success's of the soviet union, we may not have had the wherewithal to accomplish what we did as a nation back then.
Nope, they managed to fool enough people for long enough. Consider and accept that MOST people utilise only two sources of information to form their world view, tv thus paying for their and families propagandization and “news” papers controlled since operation mockingbird.
And yet...nasa can't do it 'today' because they've lost the 'technology'...!! It's a patently fake narrative friend...the moon is translucent and emits it's own light...man has not been on the moon.
What beats me is the fact that if they didn't know about the moon and space in general how could they know to train for it ??????? NOBODY HAS EVER BEEN IN SPACE OR ON THE MOON ------- IT'S JUST ONE BIG HOAX AND THE LIE OF ALL MANKIND
most of the world knows about the Apollo missions, as missions were followed by several space agencies, some were used for communications when the american antennas couldn't point at the space craft. before and after Apollo, many lunar missions have transmitted info from the moon. in fact, the Soviet Union transmitted the first pictures oft he far side of the moon, in 1959. Why not learn about the subject you post about, rather than make up garbage, or believe other morons?
Rocket gives the capsule its initial speed. The rocket shuts off and due to earth gravity it continues to get slower and slower. When it gets close enough to the moon, it’s gravity causes it to speed up. Then they fire the rocket to slow up to orbital speed of the moon.
ANd don't forget, LOTS of money. NASA got 4% Of the federal budget in the mid 60s. NIxon chopped it in the 70s, and now, NASA gets only about 0.4% Of the federal budget. And still does some increditable work, just no manned missions at this point.
@Thomas Pickering You must be really sad inside yourself to revolve yourself around everything being a conspiracy. Moon landing was real. We found out about how the moon formed by bringing rocks from there. You think that Moon spit them to Earth for no reason? Stop being a conspiracy person who doesn't acknowledge anything. You are probably so easy to manipulate. If I tell you air was invented by aliens to brainwash us on living and government sprays magic powder to control us you will say that is true and it's a conspiracy. Stop being a dickhead
@Thomas Pickering You don't know what you are talking about then my friend. You don't need to explain this to me. Let's end this point. Although I also have my doubts with many things US Government did to their people(Like killing JFK and 9-11) Where it is obvious they were involved, I can't say the same about the moon landings. It was not possible to fake them back in 1969. You don't need to be a genius to realize that. So my advice to you is to think rationally and not listen to every bullshit you hear bro. Again, I also think there are some sketchy shits US Gov did. But moon landings was not their business and they couldn't fake it. They actually needed to get there. Even fking Soviets acknowledged that. Let that sink in a bit
@@rearview2709 I don't realize that : * The crew of Apollo 11 had no " Hollywood Star " charisma * The images were below Hollywood standards ....for the 1920 's *No Hollywood moon landing movies ever had LOR in them *No books , movies , or magazine articles ever had something as functionally fugly as the LM in them
@@rearview2709 how can you trick 400k staff members, engineers, suppliers, university staff, etc? plus some million TV viewers? plus the USSR doing their maths with triangular communication, so they did know that apollo 13 was 200k miles away off earth orbit? if USSR scientists knew that apollo was fake, boi, that would have been some nice propaganda there. on the other hand, if you don't know for yourself for sure, you have to believe. like you believe in something like a god that you actually never saw or felt, right? we all know how christian and obedient to authority american people are. I'm sorry for you that you have been forced to fight in vietnam. must have been a shocking experience there.
In response to Bart Sibrel's attack on our astronauts and space program I offer the following questions to him: I’ve viewed the April 12, 2020, video by Mr. Akers regarding the falsification of the Apollo 11 moon landing mission and have some questions: Which moon landing: Are you suggesting, through Akers, that all the moon landings were faked during the period of June 1st through June 3d of 1968? What of the other missions that touched down at different landing sites on the moon, providing different topography that would have been necessary to create in the hangar. How did they know how many fake landings would be needed? Remember, each fake landing requires a fake takeoff from the fake moon’s surface, complete with fake radio calls. And all of this was completed in only 3 days of shooting? Additionally, how do you account for the different Lunar rovers. Why would they predict that the design would change over such a short time if all of this was faked? Are you suggesting that we never made it to the moon at all, even to orbit? If so, how do you account for Apollo 8’s “Earth Rise” photo taken by Astronaut Bill Anders in December of 1968. Location: Cannon versus Groom Lake and/or Area 51 - why pick Cannon, a traditional Air Force Base instead of a highly secure facility such as Groom Lake or Area 51 where a variety of deep black programs were underway? Akers states that before his father arrived on station that “100’s of dump trucks” delivered the materials to build the fake set. Then Akers states that after the taping, the set was disassembled, which would have required the same number of trucks to haul away the materials - and nobody noticed? Personnel Involved: Eugene Kranz, Neil Armstrong, and Buzz Aldrin - Why Gene Kranz? He was the Flight Director and where was Mike Collins? If they needed to provide concurrent audio with the video, I see the need for Kranz, however, they’d also need audio from Collins in Columbia. In his book, “Apollo 8” Jeffrey Kluger recounts George Low’s August 1968 idea of switching the Apollo mission lineup which would, in effect, negate the idea that Armstrong and Aldrin being pre-selected as co-conspirators during the June 1 through 3 videotaping of the “faked” landing. Akers’ father: Entry Access list read to viewers by Akers did not include his father’s name; therefore, he could not have witnessed the videotaping. Akers father, as an NCO, would not be solely responsible for such security without an officer in charge. As a former group commander under whom was the security forces squadron, then known as Air Police, there is no way he was responsible for this level of security assignment. Akers father was sworn to secrecy by the NSA? Why the NSA? NSA was created in 1952 to evaluate signals intelligence which had nothing to do with the NASA projects Deathbed confession: This video is a deathbed confession of a deathbed confession. The pictures of Akers’ fathers AP badge and flag lend nothing to the story. Since young Akers went to school wearing long sleeve shirts to cover the purple bruises, it may be safe to assume Akers the elder may have abused his son. The original information was destroyed in a mysterious fire, 2 men in “Black Suits” visited Akers and his house was broken into twice. I’m wondering why you called the police to report the break ins versus Akers. What, if anything, was stolen, and was that to lead us to believe the burglaries were in relation to any evidence Akers may have had in the house? In his January 29, 2013, video, Writer/director S G Collins of Postwar Media debunks every theory that the Apollo Moon landings could have been faked in a studio. The filmmaker looks at the video technology of the late 1960's, showing alleged fraud was simply not possible. In essence, SG Collins describes how, what Sabril profess to be true, was impossible in 1968. Moon Landings Faked? Filmmaker Says Not! - RUclips
When Kennedy announced the Moon mission we had not just barely orbited an astronaut, we had only shot Alan Shepard on his 15 minute ballistic ride into space.
Way too many commercial interruptions. RUclips is a place where viewers used to go to avoid ads, Now RUclips has twice the ads that commercial tv ever had
@@antoniopacheco864 I swear to god, this is not the place for flat earthers or fake moon landing people. Grab your tinfoil hat and watch a 9/11 fake video jeez..
"I'd go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again." Don Pettit, NASA...what??????? poor NASA, you can't go higher than an air balloon
Your taking what he said out of context it took nasa 152 billion dollars to put a man on the moon even cutting that number in half to 76 billion it would still take NASA 4 and a bit years to build a Saturn V. So everyone who worked on the mission either died or retired. So yea that's how you lose technolgy. Please research when you comment on a video against the video.
@@dantaedahmesl7441 what??????????? some people died or retired and NASA lost the technolgy ? Don Pettit said half truth, the other anyone can understand
@@dantaedahmesl7441 Nobody kept the plans? Thousands of hours of data? LOTS of people die or retire and yet, people still build cars and airplanes. With today's technology, computer design, 3D printing of prototype parts, improved rockets and fuels, better metallurgy, composite materials, and Elon Musk to get the job done, on time and under budget,,, what's the problem?
When SpaceX lands Starship on the Moon and Mars and once again people will walk on a different celestial body, I'm going to to be laughing at all the conspirators because they will be proven wrong once again. The best part is they would be able to buy a ride around the moon!! Even with that, they will still say its fake though. I think its really awesome that even today people still can't wrap their head around what we did the 60's and 70's.
We? Who the fuck are you, Werner Von Braun's ghost? Were you even alive during the Apollo era? You don't know jack-shit about the space program except the propaganda you have been exposed to.
@@charlestidd4616 Who do you think you are? Im just someone with an option based on scientific research. No I wasn't alive during that time were you? If you were it doesn't make a difference. Today we understand more about space then we ever did back then. Btw the Earth isn't flat there are pictures of Earth taken from the surface of the Moon (not just Apollo photos).
@So No images.app.goo.gl/jRXx3xkMNpH2NhYRA here is a picture of Earth from the Apollo 11. This was taken on film. The IQ of a tic must be high. 3.925 GPA in college about to be 4.0 at the end of this semester. Also got an engineering internship 2 years before I was qualified for it. Also starting the base work on developing a liquid fuel rocket engine. Tell me how that gyro experiment is work for the flat Earth society. I would love to see the research paper for this "close system" that's been peer-reviewed by multiple accredited sources.
Neil Armstrong left his footprints on the moon but the first thing to touch down was the landing gear on the lunar Lander. That landing gear was designed and built in Canada. One small step for us. Glad we could help. Stay safe my friends.
interesting film Paul. good to know 'what happened next'... the answer to that is often more surprising than the event itself..... sounds like a YT theme...happy new year from us all at the Professor Simon Channel.
Klem Bach that just adds to his point we can’t even figure out how they built the pyramids without machines but we can get to mars and the moon it’s a hoax wake up sheeepy
@@erniefasbender4939 we "Can" go to the moon, but take away the funding then that becomes financially impossible. Blame your government for lack of moon missions. Not NASA, not anybody else. Also - blame ignorant morons... such as yourself.
I saw Apollo 11 lift off in person from Cape Kennedy and believed it went to the Moon for 40 years. Today I am 100% certain all of the Apollo missions were hoaxes and that I was duped. Man has never left Earth orbit much less land on the Moon. You space fans need to do some growing up. It is common knowledge that the Moon landings never happened. You all have been mind controlled,
In the first minute of the show, the narrator says, “But in 1961, when Kennedy pledged to put a man on the moon, NASA had barely put a man into orbit.” This is incorrect. Kennedy made his announcement shortly after NASA put its first man into space, when Alan Shepard flew a suborbital mission on May 5, 1961. NASA didn’t put a man into orbit until John Glenn flew on February 20, 1962.
Merely damage control. Their Satanic construct is beginning to unravel. Wake up my friends. We have been lied to for generations, the oligarchy is losing their grip
To all of you who say men never went to the moon you really shouldn't judge, belittle, or denigrate the achievements of others using your own limitations, shortcomings, paranoia, and general lack of intelligence as comparative measures. Might I suggest you research the Dunning-Kruger effect, it will give you a huge insight into yourselves.
@@redarmy1778 Very odd question given the subject matter of the video, but anyway what I believe doesn't matter, it's what the facts prove. Knowing something to be true and believing something to be true are not the same thing.
It is the compulsive defenders and apologists who must repeatedly name-call and paste assumptions -- as you also have done here. Such behavior enlightens us to the desperation as we see the same kind of responses over and over again.
The astronauts move without restriction or difficulty while walking and working on the moon. This however cannot occur in a vacuum. Suit technology hasn't reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking in a vacuum without very stiff and awkward movements or great effort to strain against suit pressure that is multiplied over several hundred square inches for each limb of the suit. 5 psi becomes hundreds of pounds in the leg of a suit for example, and a substantial part of that pressure is working against any movement away from the shape formed under pressure. The same occurs for the smaller arms of the suit, moved by human arms of proportionately less strength. Fingers also move only with difficulty, whose strength drains quickly under the strain so that useful work would be nearly impossible. An advanced form of suit that incorporates a lightweight exoskeleton might be possible, maintaining suit pressure while permitting movement, perhaps power assisted. Clearly, this is not what we've seen so far, while there is evidence of faking some of the space videography even in low earth orbit. While hammering, we can hear the sound of hammering in the astronaut's microphone though he stands in a vacuum on the moon's surface. We're told the sound traveled through is arm and into his suit having a breathable oxygen mixture. Another astronaut throws an object and we hear the sound clearly as the objects strikes the lunar module -- no arm to conduct the sound into the astronaut's suit. . No other mic was on, other than those worn by both astronauts. . We expect more name-calling, derogatory language and assumptions in place of any legitimate or genuine response. Prove us wrong. .
@@mundaner-1163 and why do those who suffer from hoaxitus always talk about blind belief? It’s the ultimate cop out. Keep watching those hoax vids, I know it’s fashionable these days to believe it’s all a hoax, but that’s all it is. a fad. I mean who wants to be at a party being the only one who thinks man walked on the moon? The horror!!!
@@nicsandee123 You tell me. Why would people even started to believe these stuff? To help them sleep at night? No, it is because people are sheep. Blindly believe to those who have power. So yeah keep partying without asking questions, keep being dumb. People like dumb people to overwhelm them.
Crypto Jack science is testable and reliable. When something is proven wrong they go back to the drawing board. This world would be far better off without religion
@QuIgYx So --- you've just watched a full hour of honest, carefully considered comment from Eminent scientists and experts ( two of which I know personally, so I can vouch for their qualifications ), and you Still say that??? That just Proves that you are not able to think clearly obviously.
I have a question for all of the moon deniers on here. Where do you think all of the moon rocks that are in museums and labs all over the world? What about the reflectors that we left on the moon that you can bounce a laser off of to this day. Explain that.
@@Frankiej22472 They are extremely dry more so than earthly rocks and contain traces of hydrazine a component of the lander's rocket fuel that contaminated the surface on landing where the samples were picked up from.
Fake glove, it is actually a three dimensional simulator made by alien overlords to make us believe that there is nothing but empty space outside of our flat planet. Joking.
We are repeating those challenges all over again with the help of SpaceX & their concept design, building & testing of Star hopper & starship prototypes. Now I know what it was like to be alive when the Saturn 5 was being developed & first flown. The development of the F1 engines that powered the Saturn 5.
First satellite in space - Sputnik 1957 (Soviet) First animal to orbit the earth - Laika 1957 (Soviet) First man in space - Yuri Gagarin 1961 (Soviet) First woman in space - Valentina Tershkova 1963 (Soviet) First tethered space walk - Alexei Leonov 1965 (Soviet) First human fatality in space - Vladimir Komarov 1967 (Soviet) First animal to orbit the moon - Russian Tortoises 1968 (Soviet) First moon landing - Apollo 11 1969 (American) First space station - Salyut 1971 (Soviet) Americans writing history - "We win the space race!!!🥳🥳🥳"
You forgot about: First monkey, primate and mammal in space - V-2 sounding rocket, Albert II 1949 First monkeys to survive spaceflight - Jupiter IRBM, Miss Able and Miss Baker, 1959 First docking of two spacecraft - Gemini VIII and Agena target vehicle in 1966 First to successfully work during EVA - Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin during Gemini XII in 1966 First human spaceflight to leave low earth orbit and reach the Moon - Apollo 8 in 1968 First untethered spacewalk - Bruce McCandless II during STS-41-B in 1984 Also Komarov didn't die in space, but when the Soyuz 1 descent module hit the ground following parachute failure.
Are you above 3rd grade? That’s the max of intellectual wisdom that this Saturday morning cartoon could communicate. Sorry, no Jetsons comic for the break!
It's sad that they didn't even touch on the sacrifices of Grissom, Chafee, and White in the Apollo I fire. Had that horrible tragedy not occured they wouldn't have discovered all of the really serious problems with Apollo vehicle as a whole & we would have lost a good many astronauts in the progress, and possibly would have never made it to the moon.
The unofficial but unavoidable verdict was that the cabin could only have been filled with oxygen on purpose. Numerous people died during the Apollo Project ten of them astronauts during everyday life on Earth, Only in America eh? Thank god.
@@williambennett26 was pure oxygen standard at the time. That has always Bern my understanding and that the different atmosphere was developed and used because of the Apollo 1 tragedy.
i was 14 years old when apollo 11 landed on the moon, back then we had 3 networks abc,nbc ,and cbs they all carried the moon landing for 3 straight days, america was proud
And you have allowed your cognitive dissidence regarding the moon landings to rule you. Understandably there are few with the critical thinking ability and courage to overcomewho can overcome their cd
@Alvino A They had space suits and the temperature You are talking about, may be reached at lunar noon. They all landed and took off again in early lunar morning
@Alvino A That’s Why they had white suits and Cooling devises. The cameras were Well isolated and furthermore painted with reflective paint. What makes You think they would risk to be the laughing stock of the century by faking the landnings 10 times (1 time falling)?
@Alvino A The scientists at NASA are not as stupid and ignorant as You clearly are. How come You are unable to find the information You want? They had a TV Camera on the Rover.That Rover they parked at a calculated spot, where the Rising LM would be kept in frame when it .lifted. As with all rocket starts, They had a count down. At about ”T minus 2 seconds”, Ed Fendell at mission Control pushed the ”tilt up” button. The signal reached Moon at the same time the LM began to Rise. The Camera tilted and kept the spacecraft in frame. When the LM had reached the altitude where it tilted over to gain speed down the range to reach orbit velocity, Fendell tried to follow it manually with the Camera. That is Why it went out of frame and seemingly started to ”dance around”, Because of the signal delay. They managed to fix it according to plan the third time, on Apollo 17. Satisfied? No, of course not. You Will just find another thing to complain about.
@@tgstudio85 when you compare the the situation you have to compare both sides you forget that back then peoples had tv black and white and didnt knew what is a computer-generated imagery and fake videos but nvm
@@welldone8564 There are hundredths films, thousands pictures from Apollo missions and no one from Russian scientist said it was fake, but some trolls on RUclips without shred of knowledge about physics or optics tell me that they are fake, big LOL!
@@tgstudio85 its not what youtube show mate its simple logic based on the data nasa keep releasing even now, they said we destroyed the data of the moon landing are you serious now how you can do that the bigest achivement human kind did and lets not count the bilions that us people paid and they destroyed on purpose and even russians are involved on this even now comon use your logic leave the patriotic behavior for a moment no one hates usa
Why? Because idiot moon-hoax nuts think there's something incriminating in their body language 3 weeks after their return? lol! Your "arguments" keep getting weaker & weaker!
NASA officially confirmed that nowadays they don’t know how to get through Van Allen belts and that is why they started Orion Project but... they knew it in 1969. Yeap, high school excuse works for average Joe.
@Bob Dillahunty I'm not that little in stature nor intellect. What I am is a person who evaluates his beliefs based on information that is available to me. I also weigh in other factors, for example, the trustworthiness of the organization or if conflicts of intrusts exist. You know, little things like that. What I don't do is ridicule others who don't agree with my conclusions.
@@tryn2think43 Yeah, right...all you schizoid conspiracy theorists are exactly the same. I'm sure you also believe in "chemtrails," you think vaccines cause autism, you think September 11 was an "inside job," you think the Earth is flat, lizard aliens are taking over the world, and Bigfoot is your next door neighbor.
Gosh, what a moving, fascinating, mind-boggling adventure that we humans by rights shouldn't have gone on, didn't have the technology to go on, but went on anyway -- because we're humans dammit, and this is what we do!!
@@williambennett26 Ahh? What other animal is better in it? Not to forget Moon landings were political, cold war move. Showing superiority in military and technology. Today we have nothing like that. No one want to spend billions just to land on some barren sphere, just to prove it's doable...
For those that deny the moon landings, did you not see this video, or did we see different ones? I talked with a engineer living in Houston in 1983. He was among the 400,000 hired by NASA. He chuckled when I mentioned a grand-uncle of mine that denied it. He said "It would have been far, far harder to fake it than to do it" He was responsible for sample retrieval tools.
@felix mendez HISTORY LESSON FOR IGNORANT NINCOMPOOPS Modern History is what it is. NOT what you believe or want it to be. The SIX Apollo Moon Landings are a remarkable part of that history. An astonishing accomplishment of Scientific and Engineering research and innovation ! A heroic Human adventure of epic proportions ! GET USED TO THAT REALITY.
No. Felix, I have no idea if he still survives but, at that time (1983), this man worked as a executive in the booming oil industry. He was one of the many thousands fired by NASA before apollo 17's completion. Your flimsy "theory" is porous at best.
@felix mendez Perhaps the photos of the Apollo 15 exhaust plume would cinvince you? I think not despite no evidence. They orbited the moon taking high resolution photos for well over a year before orbit-decay and intentionally crashing the satellite. Or, the 842 lb of lunar samples (and freely shared with countries)? Or, the various insyruments left behind (still in use) to calculate distances to/from the lunar surface? Ironically, connspiracy "theorists" bore me with their lack of facts that you are supposedly fond of.
@@joelwhite3337 Won't do any good Joel. You're dealing with a willfully ignorant conspiracy theorist. He thinks he's more intelligent and knowledgable than the hundreds of thousands of Scientists, Engineers and Technicians who were, directly and indirectly, involved in the Apollo Moon Landing Program. Talk about being self- delusioned. He's an ongoing sick joke that's not even funny. Sad and pathetic actually.
And they never talk about all the other important test flights that multiple other people had to do to make it possible - sure, give good ol' neil his credit, but those peeps deserve it too
@@geracb I did actually and in fact I'm gonna watch it again today. I was more referring to the "most people" that yubik nakarmi was talking about, not the documentary itself (which I think is brilliant) - although I should have specified that a year ago when I made the comment. Apologies.
Those three astronauts that died in the capsule fire 🔥 should have survived if their suits were "space" proof. Wouldn't fire be one element to protect against?
All these guys are super human.. imagine the stresses.. is this going to work? will i be left on the moon... to die..... will this work when it has too ? .. etc .. the whole way.. there and back
Walter B That's sobering. What I wonder is how soon will it be before we visit the first star besides our sun? Right now, that seems impossible, but someone (or something) is doing it. In the late 60's I witnessed a classic 'Flying Saucer' at night, slowly fly directly over my house at an altitude of less than 100'. Years later, when I first watched the movie, "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", which has a similar scene, my hair literally stood up on end as it was so eerily similar to what I had witnessed decades earlier.
Surely are an awful lot of UNEDUCATED people insisting this didn’t happen, couldn’t happen, won’t happen. Go back to school and learn something this time.
Bet you're so educated that you believe we can see stuff 1000s of lightyears away.. lol one light year is 5.8 trillions miles.. I say Impossible . But the smart people are fooled very easily !!! Science say it true so you believe.. we barely see plantets.. they are now saying they see gold ..lol
@@Tim22222 Yawn.... they omitted while the narration said "The missions were textbook. Everything went according to plan". Eh, not so much. Deal with it.
You can choose not to believe the moon landings happened but please pay some respect to those brave men who risked their lives. It's such a painful thing to risk your life to achieve something only for someone to discredit your work.
@@arnoldaduko3821 No clear evidence for their claims chief. They erased the original footage, they lost the Telemetry data, they gave a piece of petrified wood to the Netherlands, and the face of the missions was a NAZI war criminal. Peace
@@nealswanson8684 there are realtime videos of the astronauts climbing up into the Saturn 5s... there are videos of the Saturn 5 lifting up from the launch pad into the sky, staging.... and there are videos of their splashdown into the ocean 4 days after leaving the earth. There are videos on NASA website of apollo 17 astronau8 riding the lunar rover on the moon. There is footage of the first moon landing. It is not unacceptable for NASA to misplace or lose data. You are basing on the lost data to say the moon landing was faked and this is clear conspiracy theory. You have to prove that the moon landing was faked with evidence. You have no evidence. If they didn't go the moon, where did Apollo 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 17 go???? Why didn't Apollo 13 land on the moon. You say they didn't go to the moon without evidence and that is conspiracy theory.
@@1magnit : the mass is the same in either 1 g or 1/6 g, so camera speed wouldn't do it. So where is this magical studio that was in vacuum? Where are the vacuum suits for the cameramen?
I really wish people who upload videos about the Apollo missions would just delete all the idiotic conspiracy theorist comments. I'm so sick of seeing these tin foil hat nutjobs.
@@ct92404 exactly! Nasanuts wanna believe nonsense (Apollo went to moon w/out any fuel!) and astro's dealt with + and minus 200 degree temps wearing snowsuits! Omg!
@@nancyelliot8411 You're a schizophrenic idiot. As I explained to you already the last time you posted one of your many nutjob conspiracy theorist comments in another video, the Apollo spacecraft carried fuel in the Service Module, which was only separated just before re-entry. Now take off the tin foil hat and get a life.
@Thomas Pickering yeah, right, your so-called "truth" is whatever bullshit you read on conspiracy theorist websites and anything nutjobs like Alex Jones and Bart Sibrel tell you. Just STFU and go shove your tin foil hat up your ass.
@F6 Train for what though. They had no idea what to expect once they got there. They had all these machines to simulate the Moon's gravity, but who said that's what it's like on the moon prior to them landing. How did they know their simulations would be correct?
Proof has shown they never went to the moon, no one can go to the moon, otherwise other countries would be sending man to the moon also if it was as easy as it was in 1969. If you research the moon landings you can clearly see no man has ever gone to the moon.
@J Calhoun The proof they did not go is the moon is in the whole entire mission. Anyone with half a brain cell can work out it is impossible to use what they did to achieve what they say they did. Look at the whole mission again, the vehicles they used and how they say they used them, you will clearly find it cannot be done, even NASA themselves will tell you its impossible to go to the moon with what they know right now, They cannot do it now but you believe they done it back then in 1969? Man cannot even build a spaceship today with all the money in the world. All we can make is satellites that orbits within the earths atmosphere. Please show me one spaceship man has built that leaves earths orbit fly's around space for a couple of weeks or months and then comes back into earth orbit and lands again? Their should be 100's of these vehicles by now. Space exploration has gone backwards since 1969, why do you think that is? Money? LMAO, money is not the issue.
@J Calhoun LMAO, It is you who has nothing to back your claim that NASA went to the moon. Please show me your evidence and i will pull my pants down and shit all over it with facts. Please enlighten me with your proof? I have researched this topic for 7 years so please make sure its good otherwise you are going to look a bigger fool than you do now.
Kevin Hollerbach It was an expensive, meticulous, yet very risky hightech project that had been impossible without great determination, perseverance and courage!
i am sorry you feel this way. consider this: tens of thousands of people around the world worked on the Apollo program from building systems to researching the samples brought back by the flights. for even 1/10 of these people who would have worked on "the secret" to not have said anything in the last 50 years, the research scientists, film crews, 27 astronauts themselves, to have kept quiet is unbelievable. even today, trying to keep up the charade by co-opting new people is unrealistic. but, you go on drinking your kool-aid and insisting everything is one big lie. that is your right. i do feel sorry for you and your closed mind.
David Hamann but what if all those people didn’t know it was a secret? Have you heard of compartmentalisation? It’s like the pharmaceutical companies lying today, Doctors are fed info and they run with it and in turn advise us patients on which drugs we should be consuming when in fact humans shouldn’t be talking any man made synthetic drugs, so in answer, no, those people weren’t keeping a big secret at all they all thought they were actually working on the missions, even the astronauts did until the last minute. So instead of telling us that we have closed minds.. try opening yours a little.. have you seen the nasa video where they actually admit they can’t get out of earth orbit yet and never have? Look it up it’s your trusty NASA’s words not ours. Peace
@@DubzCo All you need is the fake video feed. No one has to know but the astronots and a few at the top. It was all live TV so they thought it was gone forever at the time of airing, with no way to record or analyze. The ability to digitally overlay the Moon sets from different missions, revealing multiple uses of the landscapes and LEM was a completely foreign idea to them. This is NASAs worst nightmare.
Get a life. The moon landings were REAL and they were AWESOME! Why is it that losers who have never accomplished anything in their lives feel the need to snipe at those who have?
@@Tim22222 do you have any self awareness? Why dont you stop being such a boring loser and accept that things might not be quite as black and white as you have been lead to believe my the television.
J Calhoun Okay...I got this, you do know having a reflector on the moon makes no difference when it comes to bouncing laser signals , the laser works by bouncing off of objects...nothing to do with reflectors. Though I know where you're coming from, bike reflectors and light etc, it's back to school for you I'm afraid.
J Calhoun Trust me I've looked into it probably deeper than you have, the evidence that it was staged is out there if YOU take the time to do some research. For starters I suggest you watch the apollo 11 press conference on their return where they are clearly uncomfortable with what they have to participate in.
Such a shame that a minority of science-impaired trolls feel the need to make themselves feel special by crapping on this incredible achievement, as well as on the many thousands of people who gave their best to make it happen.
@@Frankiej22472 Armstrong was not a rocket scientist. He was a TEST PILOT. If any of the astronauts had a "straight face" it was Neil, You, on the other hand, have a problem accepting it. That doesn't matter though, because the veracity of the Apollo program does not rely or depend on whether nutjobs like you accept it or not.
Easy neb, I was talking to the other guy. And be careful, I’m not a gynecologist. I can’t help you if your vjay explodes! So we don’t believe some crazy story, why does that ruin your shitty life?
When Neil Armstrong was asked was there any smell in the air(or lack of) "...it had a slight smell of gunpowder..." Neil also made reference to a 🦜 parrot on several occasions....why is that NEIL..." because it says what it is told..." I feel sorry for this guy and the guilt he lived with...but bless his soul as he provided many clues to the Apollo narratives and the riddle which lies beneath the truth
Niel Armstrong even said it was just like walking on a freshly plowed field....lol 😆 Another comment he made...was...I really wanted to believe that I was on the moon...lmfao
So by some strange force of nature or whatever the fact that Neil Armstrong quoted a piece from Wilbur Wright’s famous ‘parrot speech’ means that it’s fake? I guess that explains such phrases as ‘paid shills’ and what have you? Obviously, if you might happen to ‘believe’ man went to the moon then obviously you are a Scottish Born Freemason shill, indoctrinated from birth by witchcraft and poisoned spaghetti. And yes, Scotland has become part of the moon hoax narrative, I kid you not😎👍
NASA canceled it's trip too the moon for 2024, Still working on developing spacesuit to walk on the moon, which is going too take four years, and cost four billion dollars. Lol... I tell you NASA is a joke, they never set foot on the moon...
Congratulations.. you have earned the right to include Neil Armstrongs statement on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'...
@@KPL400 He was talking about you,you idiot, still believe in the nonsense of fairy tales and science fiction.. The poor little man,always looking worried, knowing he sold his soul too the devil worshipping freemason organization, and had to carry that lie too his grave...
“Has it ever struck you that life is all memory, except for the one present moment that goes by you so quick you hardly catch it going?”― Tennessee Williams
@@godsownlunatics9650
@@bvskyfacer4377 Not at all, literally life is either memory, present (which is VERY fleeting) or anticipation, be it good or bad anticipation
@@stevelowe2647 An interesting fact about Memory, I had a rather significant stroke a few years ago, one of the things its left me with is tracking short time memory loss, my consultant explained to me that the part of my brain that is damaged is the bit that records and stores things properly as they happen, (we'll call this the short time box) its incredibly frustrating tbh, its a bit like someone pressing the pause button on and off very briefly, short time memories are then condensed and stored in a different part of the brain (long term box) as long time memory, so when you remember something from say years ago, the brain takes that memory out again, gives it a dust down, then puts it in the short time memory box, then condenses it again and puts it back in the long term memory box, so when you remember something it is just from the last time you remembered it, even from years ago. Now Deja vu is a slight short circuit in the brain when it briefly puts bits of short term tracking memory in the long term memory box , this confuses the brain so it tries to take it back out again (repair the short circuit if you like) and put it back in the short time tracking box, this then makes you think your remembering something that has already happened before, which hasn't, its just now remembering the last time you remembered it, which was a split second ago when the brain was flitting it between the two memory boxes, I now have around 20 of these a day, because my short term tracking memory box is damaged by my stroke, this leads to a lot of confusion and false memories when I remember things I have not said or done and vice versa (which is why my wife needs to control and monitor all my medication. .. Now, I hope I have remembered all that correctly..but who can tell, not me that's for sure 🤣
True. Depressing, but true
Looking forward to SpaceX Astronauts landing on the moon and exploring former Apollo landing sites.
Not a chance. It was recorded in a studio.
@Son Of Cherve Its the truth.
@Son Of Cherve Im not even gonna answer that. But if you truly believe they had the know how to to send men to the moon and return them, alive, there is something wrong with you.
They just went to space and came back. It was all planned to win the space war against the Soviet Union.
Why are there no successive missions? After all the technology we have now..
@Son Of Cherve This is the same country that refuses to tell the truth about 9/11, and the gulf of Tonkin accident which resulted in the vietnam war. USA has a history of covering enormous things up. So yes, I wouldnt be surprised if the moon landings were a hoax.
I would,nt hold your breath on that one mate.
How DID NASA Land Neil Armstrong On The Moon?
Buzz Aldrin: [Hands in pockets. Turns away. Mumbles] "They landed me too."
Ikr, just cuz buzz didnt land his foot in the moon first doesn't mean he shouldn't get any credits
@colan powel are you an idiot, it happened, it would've been harder and more expensive if they faked it.
Buzz Aldrin is an asshole and a drunk.
@@ConnMC No it wouldn’t have. A movie set would be much less in comparison.
@@tamarafletcher7965 No, it wouldn't. You're not thinking critically.
When filming a movie, nobody is pretending that what they're filming is real.
Your supposed _Apollo_ film set wouldn't have that luxury. The people involved would need to actually pay for all the supposed _Apollo_ equipment (even if it didn't work), and _then_ pay extra for the film set and VFX.
Another thing you're missing is that _Apollo_ footage isn't like your typical film - it's shot with one camera in a continuous manner, with no cuts.
_Another_ thing you're not considering is the fidelity of the supposed VFXs, which Hollywood is still unable to match _to this very day_ using purely practical effects.
I remember being allowed to stay up late to Watch this...(I'm in the U.K.) I was only 8, but I remember it like it was yesterday, but landing Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the Moon wasn't the most remarkable thing they did....That was getting them Back again..and Alive !! ....Marvellous 😊
@Alvino A LOL, i didn't even see the answer to poor Coldeb, but I was sure sure sure, that a MORON would answer something and BINGO !!!!! Thanks for sharing making an idiot of yourself! Please watch the film again, there's something you missed boy! :D :D :D Oh, and go back to school and do your science homework please!
@Alvino A it's not that people don't question. It's that people like you dont want to see the evidence. If you REALLY cared to fact check the moon landing, you would be searching Google for answers, not on RUclips.
My parents let me stay up late that night and I remember how excited I was to see Neil Armstrong make that " one small step".
I was 14, looking over my mother's shoulder and chastising her for believing in only what she saw as she was glued to the Television.
T V was her God, but I told her it was a ridiculous hoax, and she was nuts to be sucked in to such a mere concocted show. I'm sure she was mad as hell, because she was a tax payer, and didn't want to be duped.
@@harrietharlow9929 Did you know Neil Armstrong cocked that line up..he was supposed to say..”That’s one small step far a man” etc etc, …but I suppose we can forgive him, what with all the excitement and all 😂
I like how the narrator listed the Mercury 7 in order of their actual flights (with Slayton being last, since he didn'y fly until Apollo-Soyuz)
But they did eventually let him go up heart murmur and all.. I thought that was great..
@@godsownlunatics9650 You clearly need some better drugs.
@@godsownlunatics9650 Uh huh....and you deleted the completely non-sensical post I responded to....nice try,
You don't have to read the thread.
@@godsownlunatics9650I'm about to have s field day with you, kiddo... sit tight
@@godsownlunatics9650 you must not be an adult yet. Don't worry, it only gets better. Hang in there, kiddo☆
I just discovered a long time family friend was an engineer at North American Aviation during the 60s. He had some amazing stories about the rush to the moon!
Liar.
@@mathieutyler00 wow
@@mathieutyler00 I agree they can’t even figure out to go through the radiation belt today let alone 50+ years ago. It’s all BS. The belt is 25,000 miles thick
@@A10Jedi Hi A, hope that you are well. You wrote "They can’t even figure out to go through the radiation belt today let alone 50+ years ago". I assume that you are referring to the Van Allen Belt. To put your mind at ease here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable." Interestingly these radiation belts will still provide a challenge for the Artemis missions both in terms of choosing a trajectory through them and shielding not only for the crew but for the electronics and guidance systems. The modern electronics and IC's used in Orion are much more sensitive to radiation damage and interference than the electronics used in the Apollo Program. Take care.
I remember all these flights. Thank you for bringing back some good memories.
Harriet Me too. I was young but remember being called inside to watch on the black and white tv. Great times and a lot more innocent.
Do you remember Tom Hanks landing on the moon too ? In 1995.
@@-First-Last No, but then Tom Hanks never went to the moon. Our astronauts did.
@@SMHman666 Definitely on both counts!
@@harrietharlow9929
Have you not seen the movie ? Wow !
They are the real heroes not the ones Hollywood got!
I love 1960's astronauts.. 😭😭❤️❤️❤️
Yeah, about that...
@@williamhorton9763 What about that, Will?
@Dashing Johnny Too bad there are so many people who don't understand enough physics and technology to realize the moon landings were not a hoax. Only 6% of the population have been stupified by conspiracy videos that have been proven thousnads of times to be all false information.
@@jonathanzimmer8143 Jonathan, don't forget the Earth is FLAT :D :D :D :D
No Moon landing, 5g and covid19, flat earth.... wow...
Why is there so many dumb people on this planet????
@@W-733_KWX Agree with the so many dumb people on the planet that 'believe' the patently fake moon narrative....
" Ven der rockets go up, who cares where they come down ? That's not my department", says Werner Von Braun
- Tom Lehrer, "Werner Von Braun"
Thanks for the wonderful musical memories Professor Lehrer
SierraThunder
Yes...Thankfully
we now land the boosters...Blue Origin and Space X were the first to land booster cores.,but the technology and software was spun off NASA's Surveyor,Mars Apollo LM,lander programs
Heroes of the Human Race are the astronauts and cosmonauts that paved the way for our understanding of space and exploration through man spaceflights, a legacy that's still alive today.
I agree and look forward every year to celebrating Apollo Day
Hopefully one day soon people will understand that everything is in space. It's just that some parts of space have more stuff in them than do other parts of space.
Unless you you think small and believe everything is under a dome....
Wish I could figure things out like what you can
@@drewthompson7457 🤣🤣
I think it would have been appropriate to mention also that Russia and Gagarin took to space earlier and that this must have added pressure and resolve to the program.
You're right... A brief mention of those incredible achievements by the soviet union would have fit nicely within the scope of this documentary. Those milestones made first by our former WWII Allie (but sadly by this time had become our cold war rival) was literally the spark that lit the fuse under President Kennedy and thrust us headlong into the space race and uncharted waters. I honestly think had it not been for the early success's of the soviet union, we may not have had the wherewithal to accomplish what we did as a nation back then.
Undoubtedly.
NASA was so smart brilliant creative, and imaginative in pulling off one of man's greatest feats
Nope, they managed to fool enough people for long enough. Consider and accept that MOST people utilise only two sources of information to form their world view, tv thus paying for their and families propagandization and “news” papers controlled since operation mockingbird.
And yet...nasa can't do it 'today' because they've lost the 'technology'...!!
It's a patently fake narrative friend...the moon is translucent and emits it's own light...man has not been on the moon.
@@elmoomle4565 more than 2 generations later the European, china, and Japan space programs are still figuring out how to land man safely on the moon.
@@elmoomle4565 Have your ever tried to understand what that “lost technology” really means? No, I don’t think so…
@@edgardovillacorte7012 what are those countries manned moonlanding programs called?….
Live broadcast from the moon in 1969, lol. 50 years later and most still believe it. The show goes on :)
Lol hahaha
What beats me is the fact that if they didn't know about the moon and space in general how could they know to train for it ??????? NOBODY HAS EVER BEEN IN SPACE OR ON THE MOON ------- IT'S JUST ONE BIG HOAX AND THE LIE OF ALL MANKIND
Americans are so lovable.
most of the world knows about the Apollo missions, as missions were followed by several space agencies, some were used for communications when the american antennas couldn't point at the space craft. before and after Apollo, many lunar missions have transmitted info from the moon. in fact, the Soviet Union transmitted the first pictures oft he far side of the moon, in 1959.
Why not learn about the subject you post about, rather than make up garbage, or believe other morons?
Rocket gives the capsule its initial speed. The rocket shuts off and due to earth gravity it continues to get slower and slower. When it gets close enough to the moon, it’s gravity causes it to speed up. Then they fire the rocket to slow up to orbital speed of the moon.
"... it’s gravity causes ..."
it's
its
Learn the difference, genius.
Adblock Plus should drop some adds on RUclips. Seemingly, somebody didn't get the memo.
Just fast forward to the end of the video & then replay, all of the ads disappear
It takes 3 balls to land on the Moon! 🌚... I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space 👍🇳🇿
Neil literally landed himself on the moon.
Short answer? Talent and mass collaboration of people
ANd don't forget, LOTS of money. NASA got 4% Of the federal budget in the mid 60s. NIxon chopped it in the 70s, and now, NASA gets only about 0.4% Of the federal budget. And still does some increditable work, just no manned missions at this point.
@Thomas Pickering :You're delusional.
@Thomas Pickering You must be really sad inside yourself to revolve yourself around everything being a conspiracy. Moon landing was real. We found out about how the moon formed by bringing rocks from there. You think that Moon spit them to Earth for no reason? Stop being a conspiracy person who doesn't acknowledge anything. You are probably so easy to manipulate. If I tell you air was invented by aliens to brainwash us on living and government sprays magic powder to control us you will say that is true and it's a conspiracy. Stop being a dickhead
@Thomas Pickering You don't know what you are talking about then my friend. You don't need to explain this to me. Let's end this point. Although I also have my doubts with many things US Government did to their people(Like killing JFK and 9-11) Where it is obvious they were involved, I can't say the same about the moon landings. It was not possible to fake them back in 1969. You don't need to be a genius to realize that. So my advice to you is to think rationally and not listen to every bullshit you hear bro. Again, I also think there are some sketchy shits US Gov did. But moon landings was not their business and they couldn't fake it. They actually needed to get there. Even fking Soviets acknowledged that. Let that sink in a bit
@jimmyfly its not possible fore the mass of people to keep a secret when the don't know its a secret.
Helluva summer; watched Armstrong and Aldrin walk on the Moon , lost my virginity, turned 16 and went to Woodstock
Man o man sounds like a great time to be alive 👌😎
Sounds lit even tho they faked it still sound crazy
You do realize the moon landing was made on a movie set right here on planet earth don't you? Cool you got to Woodstock; I was in Viet Nam.
@@rearview2709
I don't realize that :
* The crew of Apollo 11 had no " Hollywood Star " charisma
* The images were below Hollywood standards ....for the 1920 's
*No Hollywood moon landing movies ever had LOR in them
*No books , movies , or magazine articles ever had something as functionally fugly as the LM in them
@@rearview2709 how can you trick 400k staff members, engineers, suppliers, university staff, etc? plus some million TV viewers? plus the USSR doing their maths with triangular communication, so they did know that apollo 13 was 200k miles away off earth orbit? if USSR scientists knew that apollo was fake, boi, that would have been some nice propaganda there. on the other hand, if you don't know for yourself for sure, you have to believe. like you believe in something like a god that you actually never saw or felt, right? we all know how christian and obedient to authority american people are. I'm sorry for you that you have been forced to fight in vietnam. must have been a shocking experience there.
In response to Bart Sibrel's attack on our astronauts and space program I offer the following questions to him: I’ve viewed the April 12, 2020, video by Mr. Akers regarding the falsification of the Apollo 11 moon landing mission and have some questions:
Which moon landing:
Are you suggesting, through Akers, that all the moon landings were faked during the period of June 1st through June 3d of 1968? What of the other missions that touched down at different landing sites on the moon, providing different topography that would have been necessary to create in the hangar.
How did they know how many fake landings would be needed? Remember, each fake landing requires a fake takeoff from the fake moon’s surface, complete with fake radio calls. And all of this was completed in only 3 days of shooting?
Additionally, how do you account for the different Lunar rovers. Why would they predict that the design would change over such a short time if all of this was faked?
Are you suggesting that we never made it to the moon at all, even to orbit? If so, how do you account for Apollo 8’s “Earth Rise” photo taken by Astronaut Bill Anders in December of 1968.
Location:
Cannon versus Groom Lake and/or Area 51 - why pick Cannon, a traditional Air Force Base instead of a highly secure facility such as Groom Lake or Area 51 where a variety of deep black programs were underway?
Akers states that before his father arrived on station that “100’s of dump trucks” delivered the materials to build the fake set. Then Akers states that after the taping, the set was disassembled, which would have required the same number of trucks to haul away the materials - and nobody noticed?
Personnel Involved:
Eugene Kranz, Neil Armstrong, and Buzz Aldrin - Why Gene Kranz? He was the Flight Director and where was Mike Collins? If they needed to provide concurrent audio with the video, I see the need for Kranz, however, they’d also need audio from Collins in Columbia.
In his book, “Apollo 8” Jeffrey Kluger recounts George Low’s August 1968 idea of switching the Apollo mission lineup which would, in effect, negate the idea that Armstrong and Aldrin being pre-selected as co-conspirators during the June 1 through 3 videotaping of the “faked” landing.
Akers’ father:
Entry Access list read to viewers by Akers did not include his father’s name; therefore, he could not have witnessed the videotaping.
Akers father, as an NCO, would not be solely responsible for such security without an officer in charge. As a former group commander under whom was the security forces squadron, then known as Air Police, there is no way he was responsible for this level of security assignment.
Akers father was sworn to secrecy by the NSA? Why the NSA? NSA was created in 1952 to evaluate signals intelligence which had nothing to do with the NASA projects
Deathbed confession:
This video is a deathbed confession of a deathbed confession. The pictures of Akers’ fathers AP badge and flag lend nothing to the story.
Since young Akers went to school wearing long sleeve shirts to cover the purple bruises, it may be safe to assume Akers the elder may have abused his son.
The original information was destroyed in a mysterious fire, 2 men in “Black Suits” visited Akers and his house was broken into twice.
I’m wondering why you called the police to report the break ins versus Akers. What, if anything, was stolen, and was that to lead us to believe the burglaries were in relation to any evidence Akers may have had in the house?
In his January 29, 2013, video, Writer/director S G Collins of Postwar Media debunks every theory that the Apollo Moon landings could have been faked in a studio. The filmmaker looks at the video technology of the late 1960's, showing alleged fraud was simply not possible.
In essence, SG Collins describes how, what Sabril profess to be true, was impossible in 1968.
Moon Landings Faked? Filmmaker Says Not! - RUclips
When Kennedy announced the Moon mission we had not just barely orbited an astronaut, we had only shot Alan Shepard on his 15 minute ballistic ride into space.
But, we knew we could do it.
meanwhile what was really being achieved far outweighed that.
Way too many commercial interruptions. RUclips is a place where viewers used to go to avoid ads, Now RUclips has twice the ads that commercial tv ever had
Alex Wilke gotta get that YT premium man. I just got suckered into it but no ads is amazing
That's weird, I had ZERO ads and haven't in over a year!! Get with the program nub!!
@@incidentalist Wow, your a friendly clown... thank God for people lke you, Einstein
@ 22:05 I hope that was a 'spare' glove !
it´s all so fake. i´m tired of laughing
@@antoniopacheco864 I swear to god, this is not the place for flat earthers or fake moon landing people. Grab your tinfoil hat and watch a 9/11 fake video jeez..
@@ThatNickYouKnow4010 what's your name Airways? Go fly to the moon then. I believe whatever I want to believe I advice you to the same.
@@antoniopacheco864 Try keeping your stupid uninformed beliefs to yourself then.
@@rollon1181 don't be like that. It's not a belief. I just saw a glove. That's it
"I'd go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again." Don Pettit, NASA...what??????? poor NASA,
you can't go higher than an air balloon
Your taking what he said out of context it took nasa 152 billion dollars to put a man on the moon even cutting that number in half to 76 billion it would still take NASA 4 and a bit years to build a Saturn V. So everyone who worked on the mission either died or retired. So yea that's how you lose technolgy. Please research when you comment on a video against the video.
@@dantaedahmesl7441 what??????????? some people died or retired and NASA lost the technolgy ? Don Pettit said half truth, the other anyone can understand
@@vasilisgeorgiou870 no no no, all people died Nd retired what he ment by that was we can't make the technolgy anymore cause of money limitations
Do you expect them to have a whole bunch of Saturn V rockets in storage, ready to launch at a moment's notice or something?
@@dantaedahmesl7441 Nobody kept the plans? Thousands of hours of data? LOTS of people die or retire and yet, people still build cars and airplanes. With today's technology, computer design, 3D printing of prototype parts, improved rockets and fuels, better metallurgy, composite materials, and Elon Musk to get the job done, on time and under budget,,, what's the problem?
16:32 does this mean that air hockey is spin-off NASA technology?
you got it Chris.. but they had to change from people to little plastic disks because the people kept falling off the tables..
In the producer and presenter reality, my bet goes to air-hockey.
I was gonna watch this, but I left when I saw all the advertisement that was inserted.
you don't know how to use ad-block?
Mr. OGPaint I had none.
But you still had the time to write a comment.
22:03 That's what $200,000 looks like flying off.
Its actually amazing they found over 100 guys who had accomplished so much at so young
the ads has let this video down sadly!
what ads
you don't know how to use ad-block?
When SpaceX lands Starship on the Moon and Mars and once again people will walk on a different celestial body, I'm going to to be laughing at all the conspirators because they will be proven wrong once again. The best part is they would be able to buy a ride around the moon!! Even with that, they will still say its fake though. I think its really awesome that even today people still can't wrap their head around what we did the 60's and 70's.
We? Who the fuck are you, Werner Von Braun's ghost? Were you even alive during the Apollo era? You don't know jack-shit about the space program except the propaganda you have been exposed to.
@@charlestidd4616 Who do you think you are? Im just someone with an option based on scientific research. No I wasn't alive during that time were you? If you were it doesn't make a difference. Today we understand more about space then we ever did back then. Btw the Earth isn't flat there are pictures of Earth taken from the surface of the Moon (not just Apollo photos).
@So No images.app.goo.gl/jRXx3xkMNpH2NhYRA here is a picture of Earth from the Apollo 11. This was taken on film. The IQ of a tic must be high. 3.925 GPA in college about to be 4.0 at the end of this semester. Also got an engineering internship 2 years before I was qualified for it. Also starting the base work on developing a liquid fuel rocket engine. Tell me how that gyro experiment is work for the flat Earth society. I would love to see the research paper for this "close system" that's been peer-reviewed by multiple accredited sources.
@@LifeonWheels the earth doesnt look completely round
@@youlittlerocket then what shape does it look to you?
Neil Armstrong left his footprints on the moon but the first thing to touch down was the landing gear on the lunar Lander. That landing gear was designed and built in Canada. One small step for us. Glad we could help. Stay safe my friends.
The first manmade thing to touch down on Moon, was the Soviet Luna probe.
I’m Mexican
NASA ALEDGES that Neil Armstrong ALSO tossed his spacesuit boot overlays out of the lunar lander before lift off 🙄
And the space shuttle storage bay arm. Gave the shuttle hands.
@@Mooseracks they shit in bags and left it up there too so what's your point?
interesting film Paul. good to know 'what happened next'... the answer to that is often more surprising than the event itself..... sounds like a YT theme...happy new year from us all at the Professor Simon Channel.
yes, no doubt about it, the earth is spherical.
Michael Fong totally
Michael Fong Hey, we all Really know earth is a cube, duh.
Went from stagecoaches to walking on another world in 100 years, amazing.
And 50years later cannot go to the moon. Fake.
Klem Bach that just adds to his point we can’t even figure out how they built the pyramids without machines but we can get to mars and the moon it’s a hoax wake up sheeepy
Went from stagecoaches to a movie set; ie 2001: A Space Odyssey; Star Wars and Star Trek; The believers of 'FAKE SPACE" are complete FOOLS !!
@@erniefasbender4939 we "Can" go to the moon, but take away the funding then that becomes financially impossible. Blame your government for lack of moon missions. Not NASA, not anybody else. Also - blame ignorant morons... such as yourself.
I saw Apollo 11 lift off in person from Cape Kennedy and believed it went to the Moon for 40 years. Today I am 100% certain all of the Apollo missions were hoaxes and that I was duped. Man has never left Earth orbit much less land on the Moon. You space fans need to do some growing up. It is common knowledge that the Moon landings never happened. You all have been mind controlled,
In the first minute of the show, the narrator says, “But in 1961, when Kennedy pledged to put a man on the moon, NASA had barely put a man into orbit.” This is incorrect. Kennedy made his announcement shortly after NASA put its first man into space, when Alan Shepard flew a suborbital mission on May 5, 1961. NASA didn’t put a man into orbit until John Glenn flew on February 20, 1962.
Merely damage control. Their Satanic construct is beginning to unravel. Wake up my friends. We have been lied to for generations, the oligarchy is losing their grip
@@robertmurphy5105 Twat...
To all of you who say men never went to the moon you really shouldn't judge, belittle, or denigrate the achievements of others using your own limitations, shortcomings, paranoia, and general lack of intelligence as comparative measures. Might I suggest you research the Dunning-Kruger effect, it will give you a huge insight into yourselves.
hackenbush23 do you believe Oswald killed Kennedy?
@@redarmy1778 Very odd question given the subject matter of the video, but anyway what I believe doesn't matter, it's what the facts prove. Knowing something to be true and believing something to be true are not the same thing.
hackenbush23 rubbish
It is the compulsive defenders and apologists who must repeatedly name-call and paste assumptions -- as you also have done here. Such behavior enlightens us to the desperation as we see the same kind of responses over and over again.
The astronauts move without restriction or difficulty while walking and working on the moon. This however cannot occur in a vacuum. Suit technology hasn't reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking in a vacuum without very stiff and awkward movements or great effort to strain against suit pressure that is multiplied over several hundred square inches for each limb of the suit. 5 psi becomes hundreds of pounds in the leg of a suit for example, and a substantial part of that pressure is working against any movement away from the shape formed under pressure. The same occurs for the smaller arms of the suit, moved by human arms of proportionately less strength. Fingers also move only with difficulty, whose strength drains quickly under the strain so that useful work would be nearly impossible. An advanced form of suit that incorporates a lightweight exoskeleton might be possible, maintaining suit pressure while permitting movement, perhaps power assisted. Clearly, this is not what we've seen so far, while there is evidence of faking some of the space videography even in low earth orbit.
While hammering, we can hear the sound of hammering in the astronaut's microphone though he stands in a vacuum on the moon's surface. We're told the sound traveled through is arm and into his suit having a breathable oxygen mixture. Another astronaut throws an object and we hear the sound clearly as the objects strikes the lunar module -- no arm to conduct the sound into the astronaut's suit. . No other mic was on, other than those worn by both astronauts. .
We expect more name-calling, derogatory language and assumptions in place of any legitimate or genuine response. Prove us wrong. .
"one small step for a man, one giant lie for the mankind"
Just because you don't understand how it happened doesn't mean it's a lie.
@@Jan_Strzelecki Just because you blindly believe it doesn't mean it's true.
@Mick Ronson says a man from a none space faring nation. Thick as two short planks
@@mundaner-1163 and why do those who suffer from hoaxitus always talk about blind belief? It’s the ultimate cop out. Keep watching those hoax vids, I know it’s fashionable these days to believe it’s all a hoax, but that’s all it is. a fad. I mean who wants to be at a party being the only one who thinks man walked on the moon? The horror!!!
@@nicsandee123 You tell me. Why would people even started to believe these stuff? To help them sleep at night? No, it is because people are sheep. Blindly believe to those who have power. So yeah keep partying without asking questions, keep being dumb. People like dumb people to overwhelm them.
I’m here for the “it never happened” comments.
Not as good as this crazy story I heard about the earth being a sphere.
@@mr.roboto8324 It is what you believe it is. Just like Santa Claus is real to kids, the moon landing is real to those who wish to believe.
Crypto Jack comparing Santa to God makes sense. Comparing it to moon landing doesn’t.
@@mr.roboto8324 People have made science their new religion.
Crypto Jack science is testable and reliable. When something is proven wrong they go back to the drawing board. This world would be far better off without religion
the quality of content is so high that i wouldn't mind a hundred ads...
you don't know how to use ad-block?
Morgan.... How?
Ya know I really enjoyed the documentary but littering it with ads kinda ruined it
you don't know how to use ad-block?
@QuIgYx So --- you've just watched a full hour of honest, carefully considered comment from Eminent scientists and experts ( two of which I know personally, so I can vouch for their qualifications ), and you Still say that???
That just Proves that you are not able to think clearly obviously.
I have a question for all of the moon deniers on here. Where do you think all of the moon rocks that are in museums and labs all over the world? What about the reflectors that we left on the moon that you can bounce a laser off of to this day. Explain that.
I did answer, but yet again I received CommieTube's patented comment ghosting.
They hate the truth with a demonic passion.
Prove to me that the moon rocks came from the moon and then I’ll sit you down for your lesson.
@@Frankiej22472 They are extremely dry more so than earthly rocks and contain traces of hydrazine a component of the lander's rocket fuel that contaminated the surface on landing where the samples were picked up from.
@@williamhorton9763 What is truth when you lie to yourself about so much, and know so little?
Judging by the comments, I'm so glad I have RUclips Red!!! 😆😆😆
Wait RUclips Red does something about this?
Reds Rhetoric does something about these comments, check out his channel.
Sounds like he doesn't like the truth.
...1st class ticket on the Von Braun Express. 😂👍
Original. Not.
25:47 anyone else notice Buzz was riping stuff off and losing stuff all over the place?
But the objects tend to go in one direction and if you were there you would understand why, and no, is not the gravity effect.
Whatever it was, it reentered the atmosphere and burned to ashes quite fast.
22:03 ... where is that glove going!!
Lithostheory ha i saw it too
Eventually deorbit I'd think
wind blew it out ?
To challenge the Russians in their Voskhod to an orbital dual!
To the surface of the water in the pool.
At 22:04 someone's glove is now space debris
Fake glove, it is actually a three dimensional simulator made by alien overlords to make us believe that there is nothing but empty space outside of our flat planet.
Joking.
Dammit man, that was my pooptube cleaning glove! You float your ass out there and get it or I'm leaving you here.
We are repeating those challenges all over again with the help of SpaceX & their concept design, building & testing of Star hopper & starship prototypes. Now I know what it was like to be alive when the Saturn 5 was being developed & first flown. The development of the F1 engines that powered the Saturn 5.
What if SpaceX built the Saturn 5 & the first 2 stages landed back on Earth like the Falcon 9 first stages. How cool would that have been to see.
Eight years to get to the moon and half a century later nine years for NASA and a billionaire to get two guys to the ISS
The Saturn V was awesome...and we went from the V2 to the Saturn V in less than 20 years. Remarkable.
@Harriet Harlow yeah the guy running nasa back then was a nazi.
Flat earthers don't like this
One small step in Nevada ..!!!😂😂😂😂😂
Or Arizona
right off route 66
Haha
Remind me to never go to Nevada if it looks like the moon.
Please tell me where in Nevada There are places with vacuum and low gravity...
First satellite in space - Sputnik 1957 (Soviet)
First animal to orbit the earth - Laika 1957 (Soviet)
First man in space - Yuri Gagarin 1961 (Soviet)
First woman in space - Valentina Tershkova 1963 (Soviet)
First tethered space walk - Alexei Leonov 1965 (Soviet)
First human fatality in space - Vladimir Komarov 1967 (Soviet)
First animal to orbit the moon - Russian Tortoises 1968 (Soviet)
First moon landing - Apollo 11 1969 (American)
First space station - Salyut 1971 (Soviet)
Americans writing history - "We win the space race!!!🥳🥳🥳"
The thing is that what the Soviets achieved was always replicated by the Americans but no one could replicate the Moon landing. So keep coping loser
You forgot about:
First monkey, primate and mammal in space - V-2 sounding rocket, Albert II 1949
First monkeys to survive spaceflight - Jupiter IRBM, Miss Able and Miss Baker, 1959
First docking of two spacecraft - Gemini VIII and Agena target vehicle in 1966
First to successfully work during EVA - Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin during Gemini XII in 1966
First human spaceflight to leave low earth orbit and reach the Moon - Apollo 8 in 1968
First untethered spacewalk - Bruce McCandless II during STS-41-B in 1984
Also Komarov didn't die in space, but when the Soyuz 1 descent module hit the ground following parachute failure.
I gotta watch this for school as an intro to physics help
Remember the dates, distance to travel how much force is need to escape earth's gravity, full needed, speed etc. You'll be good.
Read the bible buddy
What do you have to watch for English class?
Are you above 3rd grade? That’s the max of intellectual wisdom that this Saturday morning cartoon could communicate.
Sorry, no Jetsons comic for the break!
I hope you are doing well in the coarse. Physics, for me, was the subject that made all the mathematics that I learned finally click.
ohhh hell yeah they went to the moooooon.....yeah right and so did I....LOL
Maximilian0011 i was with u 😀
Don't quit your day job
There's more chance I'll become the Pope, than the moon landings even becoming possible.
@@fondelmaddick5085 well,get ready to become the pope then, cuz they will not and cant go to the moon LOL
Dude calm down your drunk and high go home and call a uber
It's sad that they didn't even touch on the sacrifices of Grissom, Chafee, and White in the Apollo I fire. Had that horrible tragedy not occured they wouldn't have discovered all of the really serious problems with Apollo vehicle as a whole & we would have lost a good many astronauts in the progress, and possibly would have never made it to the moon.
The unofficial but unavoidable verdict was that the cabin could only have been filled with oxygen on purpose. Numerous people died during the Apollo Project ten of them astronauts during everyday life on Earth, Only in America eh? Thank god.
@@williambennett26 was pure oxygen standard at the time. That has always Bern my understanding and that the different atmosphere was developed and used because of the Apollo 1 tragedy.
They certainly should have. Those men died which advanced the safety of all astronauts who came after the.
i was 14 years old when apollo 11 landed on the moon, back then we had 3 networks abc,nbc ,and cbs they all carried the moon landing for 3 straight days, america was proud
And you have allowed your cognitive dissidence regarding the moon landings to rule you.
Understandably there are few with the critical thinking ability and courage to overcomewho can overcome their cd
@@williambennett26 Is there a name for that fantasy world you live in ?
@Alvino A They had space suits and the temperature You are talking about, may be reached at lunar noon. They all landed and took off again in early lunar morning
@Alvino A That’s Why they had white suits and Cooling devises. The cameras were Well isolated and furthermore painted with reflective paint. What makes You think they would risk to be the laughing stock of the century by faking the landnings 10 times (1 time falling)?
@Alvino A The scientists at NASA are not as stupid and ignorant as You clearly are. How come You are unable to find the information You want?
They had a TV Camera on the Rover.That Rover they parked at a calculated spot, where the Rising LM would be kept in frame when it .lifted. As with all rocket starts, They had a count down. At about ”T minus 2 seconds”, Ed Fendell at mission Control pushed the ”tilt up” button. The signal reached Moon at the same time the LM began to Rise. The Camera tilted and kept the spacecraft in frame. When the LM had reached the altitude where it tilted over to gain speed down the range to reach orbit velocity, Fendell tried to follow it manually with the Camera. That is Why it went out of frame and seemingly started to ”dance around”, Because of the signal delay. They managed to fix it according to plan the third time, on Apollo 17.
Satisfied? No, of course not. You Will just find another thing to complain about.
NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Animation
Right because 60y ago there was advanced computer animation;)
Even with today's video editing/CGI, convincing footage could not be made.
@@tgstudio85 when you compare the the situation you have to compare both sides you forget that back then peoples had tv black and white and didnt knew what is a computer-generated imagery and fake videos but nvm
@@welldone8564 There are hundredths films, thousands pictures from Apollo missions and no one from Russian scientist said it was fake, but some trolls on RUclips without shred of knowledge about physics or optics tell me that they are fake, big LOL!
@@tgstudio85 its not what youtube show mate its simple logic based on the data nasa keep releasing even now, they said we destroyed the data of the moon landing are you serious now how you can do that the bigest achivement human kind did and lets not count the bilions that us people paid and they destroyed on purpose and even russians are involved on this even now comon use your logic leave the patriotic behavior for a moment no one hates usa
Watch the post moon landing interview !
Why? Because idiot moon-hoax nuts think there's something incriminating in their body language 3 weeks after their return? lol!
Your "arguments" keep getting weaker & weaker!
My psychiatrist says it’s Glossophobia, all the classic symptoms apparently. The whole lying thing is BS
*Awesome documentary Spark.*
NASA officially confirmed that nowadays they don’t know how to get through Van Allen belts and that is why they started Orion Project but... they knew it in 1969. Yeap, high school excuse works for average Joe.
The old, the dog ate the telemetry data trick. Works every time.
@Bob Dillahunty I'm not that little in stature nor intellect. What I am is a person who evaluates his beliefs based on information that is available to me. I also weigh in other factors, for example, the trustworthiness of the organization or if conflicts of intrusts exist. You know, little things like that. What I don't do is ridicule others who don't agree with my conclusions.
@@tryn2think43 Yeah, right...all you schizoid conspiracy theorists are exactly the same. I'm sure you also believe in "chemtrails," you think vaccines cause autism, you think September 11 was an "inside job," you think the Earth is flat, lizard aliens are taking over the world, and Bigfoot is your next door neighbor.
anyone notice on the footage of the spacewalk there is a glove that goes floating by, in front of the camera
I hope he has a spare
That really happened - a spare themal glove did float away while Ed White was outside his Gemini craft.
MANKIND, PLEASE BE INFORMED, THE APOLLO PROGRAM WAS THE GREATEST TECHNICAL PROJECT IN HISTORY & ALWAYS WILL BE!!!
And long may the celebrate Apollo Day every year.
Technological cheating...
Gosh, what a moving, fascinating, mind-boggling adventure that we humans by rights shouldn't have gone on, didn't have the technology to go on, but went on anyway -- because we're humans dammit, and this is what we do!!
Absolutely friend, absolutely...
Because we,re humans damn it and most of us are incapable of critical thinking
@@williambennett26 Ahh? What other animal is better in it? Not to forget Moon landings were political, cold war move. Showing superiority in military and technology. Today we have nothing like that. No one want to spend billions just to land on some barren sphere, just to prove it's doable...
"science isn't about why. It's about why not?"
Just my opinion... Applies to many other docs/true crime programs too.. Just the narrator talking would have improved this gem of a documentary...
Absolutely. All the narrators are annoying an unnecessary - just one would be fine.
For those that deny the moon landings, did you not see this video, or did we see different ones? I talked with a engineer living in Houston in 1983. He was among the 400,000 hired by NASA. He chuckled when I mentioned a grand-uncle of mine that denied it. He said "It would have been far, far harder to fake it than to do it" He was responsible for sample retrieval tools.
@felix mendez HISTORY LESSON FOR IGNORANT NINCOMPOOPS
Modern History is what it is. NOT what you believe or want it to be. The SIX Apollo Moon Landings are a remarkable part of that history. An astonishing accomplishment of Scientific and Engineering research and innovation ! A heroic Human adventure of epic proportions ! GET USED TO THAT REALITY.
No. Felix, I have no idea if he still survives but, at that time (1983), this man worked as a executive in the booming oil industry. He was one of the many thousands fired by NASA before apollo 17's completion. Your flimsy "theory" is porous at best.
@felix mendez Perhaps the photos of the Apollo 15 exhaust plume would cinvince you? I think not despite no evidence. They orbited the moon taking high resolution photos for well over a year before orbit-decay and intentionally crashing the satellite. Or, the 842 lb of lunar samples (and freely shared with countries)? Or, the various insyruments left behind (still in use) to calculate distances to/from the lunar surface? Ironically, connspiracy "theorists" bore me with their lack of facts that you are supposedly fond of.
@@joelwhite3337 Won't do any good Joel. You're dealing with a willfully ignorant conspiracy theorist. He thinks he's more intelligent and knowledgable than the hundreds of thousands of Scientists, Engineers and Technicians who were, directly and indirectly, involved in the Apollo Moon Landing Program. Talk about being self- delusioned. He's an ongoing sick joke that's not even funny. Sad and pathetic actually.
@felix mendez Wow I am convinced now! I feel so ignorant. The "lead feather" trickery convinced me..🤪
Why most of people forget about Micheal Collins in apollo 11
And they never talk about all the other important test flights that multiple other people had to do to make it possible - sure, give good ol' neil his credit, but those peeps deserve it too
True
@@hugh-martinrouxhughy7419 Did you actually see the video??
@@geracb I did actually and in fact I'm gonna watch it again today. I was more referring to the "most people" that yubik nakarmi was talking about, not the documentary itself (which I think is brilliant) - although I should have specified that a year ago when I made the comment. Apologies.
@@hugh-martinrouxhughy7419 Well, yeah. I think I misread what everybody said here. I apologize too. Greetings.
Those three astronauts that died in the capsule fire 🔥 should have survived if their suits were "space" proof. Wouldn't fire be one element to protect against?
no. vacuum is famously not full of fire.
Also, they wore early version of the suits which unfortunately weren't fireproof.
water boils in a vacuum space, how does blood behave in a vacuum space?
What is the human body made out of?
Who cares? None of the astronauts were exposed to vacuum.
TimReed22222 their suits were so how did the cooling/heating system worked in a vacuum?
@@Achisachis73 What are you asking ME for? Google it.
@@Achisachis73 magic
TimReed22222 you can just say that you don’t know. You just believe.
That was really well made and most interestingly entertaining
All these guys are super human.. imagine the stresses.. is this going to work? will i be left on the moon... to die..... will this work when it has too ? .. etc .. the whole way.. there and back
ybet1000 The same questions they, as being military test pilots (most of them) would Ask almost every day of work.
The first two men to walk on the Moon were both born only 3 years after the last Model T Ford was built (1930/1927 respectively)
Walter B That's sobering. What I wonder is how soon will it be before we visit the first star besides our sun? Right now, that seems impossible, but someone (or something) is doing it. In the late 60's I witnessed a classic 'Flying Saucer' at night, slowly fly directly over my house at an altitude of less than 100'. Years later, when I first watched the movie, "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", which has a similar scene, my hair literally stood up on end as it was so eerily similar to what I had witnessed decades earlier.
is this not more proof it was faked?
@@stephendelaney5766 Oh, yes. Absolutely!
interestingly they narrowed down 33 guys down to one that looked like the spitting image of Yuri Gagarin!
The Chinese have a space station. It’s likely that the Chinese will be on the moon to welcome NASA to the same.
Wouldn't surprise me in the least.
What a brilliant documentary, including lots of footage I had never seen before. Thank you SO much for posting it!
Lots of faked footage. Absolutely brilliant how they tricked all of mankind.
@@Beefeater911 what I don't understandz why you desperately want this mission to be fake? What if its true?
No one has ever been to the moon.
I don’t want the moon missions to be fake, but they were, without a doubt, fake.
J T elvis still alive eh , Tupac in Cuba , earth flat 😁
Surely are an awful lot of UNEDUCATED people insisting this didn’t happen, couldn’t happen, won’t happen. Go back to school and learn something this time.
It doesn't make them uneducated to disagree your wrong..
Prove to me it did happen.
@@delboy134 she cant ... zero evidence just NASA word and pictures and double filmed footage.
Bet you're so educated that you believe we can see stuff 1000s of lightyears away.. lol one light year is 5.8 trillions miles.. I say Impossible . But the smart people are fooled very easily !!! Science say it true so you believe.. we barely see plantets.. they are now saying they see gold ..lol
@@johntabuchi6831 I think its time you got laid!
They didn't mention Apollo 1. We learn from failure too.
more ads please
There is no ads on youtube. It's 2019 for christ sake!
I dont know where you live but if there is no ads over there, im moving at your place lollllll With a PC its easy to block ads with the iOS, omfg lol
@@agentpr24 you cant use adblock?
So far, on an iPhone I cannot block ads ... unless you know how and would like tonshare this secret 😜
@@agentpr24 sorry. I suggest using pc and Android))
Completely skipped over Gus Grissom's flight..... how weak is THAT?
Not everything you think should be in someone else's video has to be there.
@@Tim22222 Yawn.... they omitted while the narration said "The missions were textbook. Everything went according to plan". Eh, not so much. Deal with it.
@@Brammy007a Did you expect them to just send some dudes to space with no plan?
Its good to kno that America will always keep the world amused just like ther hollywood stars..
Bad English is not a sign of a stupid person. Don't beat yourself up over it.
Thanks for a very informative and well made video.
Absolutely 👏
The closest any human got to the moon was Michael Jackson in his moon walk.
It's spelled Apollo. And "Spae" Travel? Really?
You can choose not to believe the moon landings happened but please pay some respect to those brave men who risked their lives. It's such a painful thing to risk your life to achieve something only for someone to discredit your work.
They achieved a lame Disney illusion though. No wonder Buzz became an alcoholic. Unfortunate
well said
@@nealswanson8684 conspiracy theorist I guess.... no clear evidence for your claims. Just day dreaming...
@@arnoldaduko3821 No clear evidence for their claims chief. They erased the original footage, they lost the Telemetry data, they gave a piece of petrified wood to the Netherlands, and the face of the missions was a NAZI war criminal. Peace
@@nealswanson8684 there are realtime videos of the astronauts climbing up into the Saturn 5s... there are videos of the Saturn 5 lifting up from the launch pad into the sky, staging.... and there are videos of their splashdown into the ocean 4 days after leaving the earth. There are videos on NASA website of apollo 17 astronau8 riding the lunar rover on the moon. There is footage of the first moon landing. It is not unacceptable for NASA to misplace or lose data. You are basing on the lost data to say the moon landing was faked and this is clear conspiracy theory. You have to prove that the moon landing was faked with evidence. You have no evidence. If they didn't go the moon, where did Apollo 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 17 go???? Why didn't Apollo 13 land on the moon. You say they didn't go to the moon without evidence and that is conspiracy theory.
They did it in a studio......it's not science
I beleave in Studio. But can we 100% shure? What is fore you the hardest Argument?
Did they forget to raise the studio lights to simulate the sun rising over a 7 earth day period?
Just where was this studio that was in vacuum with 1/6th gravity? I've only found it referenced in you tube by armchair experts.
Not on the moon....the 1/6 gravity, it's done by changing the playback speed of the recording.
@@1magnit : the mass is the same in either 1 g or 1/6 g, so camera speed wouldn't do it. So where is this magical studio that was in vacuum? Where are the vacuum suits for the cameramen?
“1 stone” is such a stupid measure. Does anyone else than UK use that?
I have thrown a few in my day. Not from the UK. ;)
The greatest cinematographic achivement of all times
technically you're kinda correct, considering the monumental effort it took to obtain - the remastered film footage seen on IMAX is breathtaking!
Conspiracy theorists are scumbag losers.
Of course! 'If you can't make it, you fake it'.
@@mariacardoso1477 Is that the story of your life, schizophrenic loser?
Great video. Thanks Spark!
Sadly the comments are full of youtube trolls:/
I really wish people who upload videos about the Apollo missions would just delete all the idiotic conspiracy theorist comments. I'm so sick of seeing these tin foil hat nutjobs.
@@ct92404 exactly! Nasanuts wanna believe nonsense (Apollo went to moon w/out any fuel!) and astro's dealt with + and minus 200 degree temps wearing snowsuits! Omg!
@@nancyelliot8411 You're a schizophrenic idiot. As I explained to you already the last time you posted one of your many nutjob conspiracy theorist comments in another video, the Apollo spacecraft carried fuel in the Service Module, which was only separated just before re-entry. Now take off the tin foil hat and get a life.
@@nancyelliot8411 "snow suits"
@Thomas Pickering yeah, right, your so-called "truth" is whatever bullshit you read on conspiracy theorist websites and anything nutjobs like Alex Jones and Bart Sibrel tell you. Just STFU and go shove your tin foil hat up your ass.
How disthey trained landing and another launch? They have to land on the moon and launced from the moon.
How could they train for what it would be like on the surface of the moon, if they have never been there.
@F6 Train for what though. They had no idea what to expect once they got there. They had all these machines to simulate the Moon's gravity, but who said that's what it's like on the moon prior to them landing. How did they know their simulations would be correct?
Proof has shown they never went to the moon, no one can go to the moon, otherwise other countries would be sending man to the moon also if it was as easy as it was in 1969. If you research the moon landings you can clearly see no man has ever gone to the moon.
@J Calhoun
The proof they did not go is the moon is in the whole entire mission. Anyone with half a brain cell can work out it is impossible to use what they did to achieve what they say they did. Look at the whole mission again, the vehicles they used and how they say they used them, you will clearly find it cannot be done, even NASA themselves will tell you its impossible to go to the moon with what they know right now, They cannot do it now but you believe they done it back then in 1969? Man cannot even build a spaceship today with all the money in the world. All we can make is satellites that orbits within the earths atmosphere. Please show me one spaceship man has built that leaves earths orbit fly's around space for a couple of weeks or months and then comes back into earth orbit and lands again? Their should be 100's of these vehicles by now. Space exploration has gone backwards since 1969, why do you think that is? Money? LMAO, money is not the issue.
@J Calhoun LMAO, It is you who has nothing to back your claim that NASA went to the moon. Please show me your evidence and i will pull my pants down and shit all over it with facts. Please enlighten me with your proof? I have researched this topic for 7 years so please make sure its good otherwise you are going to look a bigger fool than you do now.
Kevin Hollerbach It was an expensive, meticulous, yet very risky hightech project that had been impossible without great determination, perseverance and courage!
They didn't. And they still can't. Worst fake string special affects since Gilligans Island.
i am sorry you feel this way. consider this: tens of thousands of people around the world worked on the Apollo program from building systems to researching the samples brought back by the flights. for even 1/10 of these people who would have worked on "the secret" to not have said anything in the last 50 years, the research scientists, film crews, 27 astronauts themselves, to have kept quiet is unbelievable. even today, trying to keep up the charade by co-opting new people is unrealistic. but, you go on drinking your kool-aid and insisting everything is one big lie. that is your right. i do feel sorry for you and your closed mind.
David Hamann but what if all those people didn’t know it was a secret? Have you heard of compartmentalisation? It’s like the pharmaceutical companies lying today, Doctors are fed info and they run with it and in turn advise us patients on which drugs we should be consuming when in fact humans shouldn’t be talking any man made synthetic drugs, so in answer, no, those people weren’t keeping a big secret at all they all thought they were actually working on the missions, even the astronauts did until the last minute. So instead of telling us that we have closed minds.. try opening yours a little.. have you seen the nasa video where they actually admit they can’t get out of earth orbit yet and never have? Look it up it’s your trusty NASA’s words not ours. Peace
@@DubzCo
All you need is the fake video feed. No one has to know but the astronots and a few at the top. It was all live TV so they thought it was gone forever at the time of airing, with no way to record or analyze. The ability to digitally overlay the Moon sets from different missions, revealing multiple uses of the landscapes and LEM was a completely foreign idea to them. This is NASAs worst nightmare.
They were sent on wires to the film set that's how
Simon Jones you’re a fucking idiot
why is there no dust on the footpads of the lander and why is there no crater under the engine? also, rockets need an atmosphere to thrust against
Care to present pictures where there is no dust at all:) Come one you didn't make that shit up, did you?
Have you learned any basic science since your post?
I'll save you an hour, they didn't
Get a life. The moon landings were REAL and they were AWESOME!
Why is it that losers who have never accomplished anything in their lives feel the need to snipe at those who have?
@@Tim22222 do you have any self awareness? Why dont you stop being such a boring loser and accept that things might not be quite as black and white as you have been lead to believe my the television.
J Calhoun
Is that your only defence?
You do know that things can be landed by unmanned craft?
J Calhoun
Okay...I got this, you do know having a reflector on the moon makes no difference when it comes to bouncing laser signals , the laser works by bouncing off of objects...nothing to do with reflectors.
Though I know where you're coming from, bike reflectors and light etc, it's back to school for you I'm afraid.
J Calhoun
Trust me I've looked into it probably deeper than you have, the evidence that it was staged is out there if YOU take the time to do some research.
For starters I suggest you watch the apollo 11 press conference on their return where they are clearly uncomfortable with what they have to participate in.
We are going to set up a Tim Horton Donut Shop on the moon. Gretzky and Crosby will be there. Perhaps some poutine for lunch?
Pp
Such a shame that a minority of science-impaired trolls feel the need to make themselves feel special by crapping on this incredible achievement, as well as on the many thousands of people who gave their best to make it happen.
Hahahah how they land neil? very simple " in a studio"😂😂😂😂
So you have millions times better computers, can you fake that images like they supposedly did it? I'm waiting for your movie:D
Even Neil Armstrong doesn't believe he walked on the moon.
No, you don't believe he walked on the moon. That is your problem because you are a conspiracy crackpot nutjob.
Of coarse not! He’s a rocket scientist! Keeping the secret isn’t the hard part, it’s saying it with a straight face that gives em the most trouble.
@@Frankiej22472 Armstrong was not a rocket scientist. He was a TEST PILOT. If any of the astronauts had a "straight face" it was Neil, You, on the other hand, have a problem accepting it. That doesn't matter though, because the veracity of the Apollo program does not rely or depend on whether nutjobs like you accept it or not.
Easy neb, I was talking to the other guy. And be careful, I’m not a gynecologist. I can’t help you if your vjay explodes! So we don’t believe some crazy story, why does that ruin your shitty life?
Wow that's incredible CGI for the 1960's...
It would have been, except that lo res CGI became available in 1976, well after the Apollo missions.
The environment in space is not harsh. Because there are no predators - Maxwell Archer
So What-
Mark Anderson
Only predator is the van allen radiation belt 😂and space debris and space trash
And extreme temperatures, both cold and hot, that humans can not survive - especially in that joke of a space suit.
@J Calhoun so the sun faces u and there is no atmosphere slowing the heat stuff . There is nothing warming u in space so.
@@brshoggalyboogaly7237 ya i forgot about them..
When Neil Armstrong was asked was there any smell in the air(or lack of) "...it had a slight smell of gunpowder..." Neil also made reference to a 🦜 parrot on several occasions....why is that NEIL..." because it says what it is told..." I feel sorry for this guy and the guilt he lived with...but bless his soul as he provided many clues to the Apollo narratives and the riddle which lies beneath the truth
You losers are REALLY reaching! lol
Niel Armstrong even said it was just like walking on a freshly plowed field....lol 😆 Another comment he made...was...I really wanted to believe that I was on the moon...lmfao
So by some strange force of nature or whatever the fact that Neil Armstrong quoted a piece from Wilbur Wright’s famous ‘parrot speech’ means that it’s fake? I guess that explains such phrases as ‘paid shills’ and what have you? Obviously, if you might happen to ‘believe’ man went to the moon then obviously you are a Scottish Born Freemason shill, indoctrinated from birth by witchcraft and poisoned spaghetti. And yes, Scotland has become part of the moon hoax narrative, I kid you not😎👍
NASA canceled it's trip too the moon for 2024,
Still working on developing spacesuit to walk on the moon, which is going too take four years, and cost four billion dollars. Lol...
I tell you NASA is a joke, they never set foot on the moon...
Your claim is as fake as your brain.
Congratulations.. you have earned the right to include Neil Armstrongs statement on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'...
@@KPL400 He was talking about you,you idiot, still believe in the nonsense of fairy tales and science fiction..
The poor little man,always looking worried, knowing he sold his soul too the devil worshipping freemason organization, and had to carry that lie too his grave...
Nah baby
U will probably deny Artemis too haha