Books ALL MEN Should Read┃Jordan Peterson

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 окт 2022
  • Jordan Peterson talks about the books that everyone should read to understand themselves better.
    Original video:
    • Higher Ed & Our Cultur...
    Dr Peterson's book, Beyond Order: amzn.to/3Ve7Cj9
    Want to Level Up in Life?
    1. 90 DAY SELF IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: bit.ly/3pTyQys
    2. TESTOSTERONE: THE PREREQUISITE FOR VICTORY: gumroad.com/a/128845747/fslht
    * Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
    1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
    2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
    3)It is not transformative in nature.
    4)I only used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.
    Virtuous Men does not own the rights to these video clips. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others.
    If you have copyright issued for your own content in the video then you can simply write:
    virtuousmen1@gmail.com
    #jordanpeterson #books

Комментарии • 142

  • @Imthegoats
    @Imthegoats 5 дней назад +50

    It's surprising how under the radar the books on Nixorus are. If you're curious, they're definitely worth a look.

  • @imspyingonyou2243
    @imspyingonyou2243 Месяц назад +31

    This is what Mortimer Adler was saying 70-80 years ago.

  • @1212zeek1212
    @1212zeek1212 10 месяцев назад +43

    What he described about certain books referencing other books and the books that get referenced the most are the ones that the most useful, that's the same thing I've done with teachers. That's how I found teachers that have helped me a lot in life.

    • @bowswindle8701
      @bowswindle8701 28 дней назад +1

      almost all western lit leads back to the bible!

    • @jonathanhenderson9422
      @jonathanhenderson9422 12 дней назад

      @@bowswindle8701 No more The Bible than Homer and the Greek Tragedians, and I could argue the latter's influence was more literary than the former. The Bible's influence was more, well, religious. Dante, Shakespeare, and Milton may have looked to The Bible for content, themes, and allusions, but they looked to Homer (and Virgil, who was contemporary with some of The Bible) for literary models.

    • @bowswindle8701
      @bowswindle8701 12 дней назад

      @@jonathanhenderson9422 you could argue that but you’d be disagreeing with most literary scholars! Funny you mention Dante & Milton’s who’s main works literally wouldn’t have existed without the Bible. Yes “homer” is also a basis for literature but to call it more influential is just not factual.

    • @jonathanhenderson9422
      @jonathanhenderson9422 12 дней назад

      @@bowswindle8701 I'm NOT disagreeing with most literary scholars. Yes, Dante and Milton took their content from The Bible, not their literary style, craft, form, or anything else. As a writer I can tell you that content matters far less than style, craft, and form. The latter is what separates the great writers from the poor and mediocre. Also, it is absolutely factual that Homer was more influential than The Bible in a literary sense. There are even scholars who think The Bible's authors were influenced by the Homeric myths, but that's debatable.

    • @griffinkirkland9087
      @griffinkirkland9087 7 дней назад

      @@jonathanhenderson9422 SINCE YOU ARE REPLYING TO @bowswindle8701
      and i will suppose you are also a christian or
      Do you know the bible itself references other older books

  • @mellow-jello
    @mellow-jello Месяц назад +4

    Agreed. Works that define first principles, or sine qua non, provides the canon with which can be the framework that knowledge is drawn upon.

  • @SpartanCharlie
    @SpartanCharlie 17 дней назад +11

    Every man should read Don Quixote at least one time in their life. The amount of ideas in Cervante's work is outstanding. If you want to appreciate the beauty of the loser and how brutal the reality is, there's no rival.

    • @h.m.7218
      @h.m.7218 15 дней назад +3

      Fantastic ! And so funny ... Well part one at least is funny. Part 2 is more about wiseness.

    • @Jedi_Mind_
      @Jedi_Mind_ 8 дней назад +1

      Wow, thanks Charlie , Because I have a listen to lectures on Don Quijote and have been trying to find the time to read it in your comment has helped me decide that I will read it next

    • @SpartanCharlie
      @SpartanCharlie 6 дней назад

      ​@@Jedi_Mind_ You're welcome. The first book can be read as a collection of short stories. It is in the second book that you actually find the most philosophical content (though the first one also has some of it). Enjoy your reading!

  • @Abuamina001
    @Abuamina001 Месяц назад +4

    I would nominate "Hadji Murad" by Leo Tolstoy and "Death and the Dervish" on any grand Master 'secular' reading list.

  • @maxalburg5665
    @maxalburg5665 9 месяцев назад +3

    I would ad Euel Ardens - Down Here in the Warmth. Wow. is all i can say. This book is about a race riot in NYC but barely mentions race. No victimization. No woke simpy messages for men. Just responsibility and teaching that responsibility through example. And exposing the media manipulation of the masses. One of the best books I've ever read.

  • @67daltonknox
    @67daltonknox 7 дней назад +4

    Bertrand Russell: History of Western Philosophy, with this you get the history of our thought and culture without the lies and fairy tales.

  • @WisdomWeaverBitcoinBruv
    @WisdomWeaverBitcoinBruv 16 дней назад

    "Mr. Spontaneous Rides the Bus" - so glad to see this on the list. So underrated.

  • @JosephDeLuna-yj8vg
    @JosephDeLuna-yj8vg 6 дней назад +1

    I Agree With Jordan Peterson! He Is A Genius!!!

  • @miketayse
    @miketayse 11 дней назад +1

    I used to be a school teacher. Larry Gonick's, "Cartoon History of the Universe" and Bill Bryson's , "a Short History of Nearly Everything" were books that I thought all should read. Their list of bibliography's in the back are very useful. Lots of other stuff too, but those come to mind as short and to the point. The bible is helpful party fodder because you can pretty much justify any action with it, and like you said, a lot springs from it. I've often said something to the effect of "I don't know what pisses me off more, people that read the bible and don't read Darwin or people that read Darwin and don't read the bible." Your suggestions are always nice, I enjoy your channel, thanks for posting and keep up the good work!

  • @grzegorzsiwek4666
    @grzegorzsiwek4666 День назад

    Thanks

  • @sylviaowega3839
    @sylviaowega3839 Месяц назад +8

    For me books of fiction become canonical when they point to certain universal truths and philosophical juxtapositions through entertainment and souls searching from the writer. Yes! There is always a truth behind learning through play.

    • @obilisk8110
      @obilisk8110 21 день назад +2

      I started a journey of reading some time ago. Reading mainly self-help. Philosophy and that sort that can help me directly. But I recently read 1984 and The Alchemist. There is more than enough room for fictitious literature to provoke deep thinking and further understanding.

  • @pattube
    @pattube Месяц назад +10

    Read the great books of the Western tradition. That's not "the patriarchy" or whatever, that's just appreciating and respecting great art (literature), like admiring a great cathedral or a beautiful painting or profoundly resonant musical piece.

    • @theboombody
      @theboombody 28 дней назад +3

      Some folks think erasing all roots is beneficial. I think I would disagree, even though those roots possess some ugliness. It's like the Star Trek episode Tapestry. You pull on an untidy thread and you unravel the entire beautiful piece. Then you're left with nothing.

    • @pattube
      @pattube 28 дней назад +1

      @@theboombody You've got my like or upvote - not only for what you said but also for referencing Star Trek! 😊

    • @theboombody
      @theboombody 28 дней назад +1

      @@pattube I learned a lot from Q and Picard.

    • @AS-wi1yl
      @AS-wi1yl 23 дня назад

      Knock off, Proustian ass comment

    • @maybethisone
      @maybethisone 14 дней назад

      @@theboombody Those people have no replacement answer based in reality which makes them diabolical at best.

  • @anewberr
    @anewberr 5 месяцев назад +2

    I hate to do this to my algorithm but, he right.

    • @perspe_tive
      @perspe_tive Месяц назад +2

      😂 I hope you’ve been enlightened in some degree in these last few months

  • @josesantos2084
    @josesantos2084 Год назад +2

    Nice

  • @Anonymityfan
    @Anonymityfan 12 дней назад

    One thing I wonder is if these books are a call to adventures then surely they are just a means to an end? Finding a call to adventure must surely be a means to going on the adventure itself?

  • @michaelangileo2760
    @michaelangileo2760 19 дней назад +4

    The book that brings back men to total fitness of mind, spirit, body is "The Carpenter's Workout." Kind of a masterpiece!

  • @Kurtofon
    @Kurtofon 28 дней назад +1

    This was beyond profound.

  • @3316xtendedmedia
    @3316xtendedmedia 16 часов назад

    Arthur Schopenhauer's The world as will and representation influenced Darwin, Freud, Dostojevski , Nietzsche,Einstein,Schrodinger, Wagner,Tolstoi. Reading it is essential for understanding of the world

  • @Strive1974
    @Strive1974 Год назад +53

    It is, and always has been, the inspired Word of your Creator. Truth doesn't stop being true because of nonbelievers. Best of luck to you.

    • @Ch0senJuan
      @Ch0senJuan Месяц назад +7

      The truth is also not explicitly the truth, because a believer claims it to be.

    • @deanodog3667
      @deanodog3667 27 дней назад +2

      The inspired word of the creator that endorses genocide etc...

    • @JCPJCPJCP
      @JCPJCPJCP 5 дней назад +1

      People still believe God dictated the Bible.
      Does this guy ever take a day off?

    • @deanodog3667
      @deanodog3667 5 дней назад

      @@JCPJCPJCP in modern terms be like saying God spoke to me through a computer!!

  • @advaitjoshi253
    @advaitjoshi253 Год назад +16

    Books that all *people should read

  • @JaySriRam963
    @JaySriRam963 14 дней назад

    The books speak.

  • @lucasl..7307
    @lucasl..7307 9 дней назад

    So...
    Bible, Shakespeare, Dante &
    Milton?

  • @Mazeltof90
    @Mazeltof90 27 дней назад +2

    The rant about toxic masculinity are simply jealousy over other capable human's achievements that resonated beyond their generation and time. Something narcissists wish they could but cant due to their self indulgence

  • @JobbyDodger
    @JobbyDodger Месяц назад +6

    i was hoping for a book reccomendation, arsed reading the bible lol

  • @ryang7759
    @ryang7759 Месяц назад +2

    largely undiscovered work of genius - Stoner by John Williams.

    • @ryang7759
      @ryang7759 Месяц назад

      it's gained popularity in recent years in certain online circles, but I'd guess that far less than 1% of American adults have even heard of it

    • @KL0098
      @KL0098 27 дней назад

      It's a pretty mediocre novel, compared with the novels of his time. His contemporaries were Barth, Gass, Reed, Elkin. The disparity in quality is tremendous! It was deservedly forgotten, and only a turn to worshipping banal, minimalist prose could have turned him into the genius he's mistaken for.

    • @thespartann7925
      @thespartann7925 18 дней назад +1

      Yeah it's a quite good book, kind of the story of every modern man in this century ;)

  • @bobdownie.2806
    @bobdownie.2806 14 дней назад

    The more we understand Christianity, the more we can understand European history, including the colonial and post colonial period (and so therefore the entire earth).The more we understand history, the more we can understand ourselves. The more we understand ourselves, the more power we shall have to better steer the ship of humanity into the future. The alternative is like driving whilst blindfolded…..at least this allows us to pry a portion of the blindfold away from the field of our vision and help us see what’s up ahead of us a little more clearly. It would be hugely ignorant to simply dismiss Christianity as some outdated and ancient form of thinking.

  • @jonathanhenderson9422
    @jonathanhenderson9422 12 дней назад +1

    Why The Bible rather than Homer, the Greek Tragedians, and Virgil? The latter were far more influential in terms of literary import. The Bible perhaps provided more thematic influences, but very few of the later great authors took The Bible as a literary model. If you want to understand Milton you need to read Virgil more than The Bible; if you want to understand Shakespeare you need to read Euripides (and Chaucer) more than The Bible.

  • @stevenhuang3635
    @stevenhuang3635 4 дня назад

    Is Bible worth reading for a non-believer?

    • @agamemnonhatred
      @agamemnonhatred 3 дня назад

      Certainly, the King James version is one of the most beautiful books in English. Treat it as a work of fiction, with crap stories, but brilliant language.

  • @sushilkumar-wb6ig
    @sushilkumar-wb6ig Месяц назад +3

    Just came to see if any feminist have screamed to change title to include both genders😂😂😂

  • @johnnysalter7072
    @johnnysalter7072 4 месяца назад +3

    Chances are slim that JP read them.

  • @freethinker79
    @freethinker79 Год назад +15

    Read the banned Gnostic writings before you get into the canonical Bible. Context is absolutely everything, and the esoteric Gnostic perspective will give you the proper lens through which to read the Church approved materials that would otherwise be perplexing.

    • @Big_Steve11
      @Big_Steve11 Год назад +10

      Well they were largely written after the canonical books so I don’t think they’re needed to understand the earlier works

    • @freethinker79
      @freethinker79 Год назад

      @@Big_Steve11 That's what the Church would like you to believe.

    • @Strive1974
      @Strive1974 Год назад +3

      The "early" church is the true church

    • @freethinker79
      @freethinker79 Год назад +1

      @@Strive1974 Yes. The original Church of Satan.

    • @SpaceKisser
      @SpaceKisser 2 месяца назад +2

      @@freethinker79 But its true. Gnosticism was not fully developed until the late first century, early second century. Certain biblical writings do go against early forms of what transformed into gnosticism.

  • @justintaylor4076
    @justintaylor4076 28 дней назад +2

    Watch Spiderman into the spiderverse 😊

  • @takayukisugano
    @takayukisugano 25 дней назад

    Men of culture, we meet here again.

  • @CommunistCommando1
    @CommunistCommando1 17 дней назад +1

    He won't mention Marx's Capital!

    • @CommunistCommando1
      @CommunistCommando1 3 дня назад

      I suppose everyone has a 'Price'!
      With everyone being subjected to be wage workers.

  • @jimantonino4394
    @jimantonino4394 7 дней назад

    All books are derive from the dictionary. 🤣

  • @KL0098
    @KL0098 27 дней назад +3

    So many banalities in such a short amount of time.
    That books exist in relationship to one another is not a "postmodernist" claim; it's a commonsensical saying of old that books are born of other books.
    The bit about having a small staff to study what makes a canon is laughable in its smugness; that legwork has been done, it was done hundreds of years ago.
    I can't tell if he's a coward or incurious to define the importance of "canonical" books in the amount of times they've been "quoted". That's a crass, materialistic, celebrity-like, capitalist, quantifiable criterion that leaves no leeway to an individual exploring on his own whatever his conscience's inclined to. It's to give up our own capacity to think and to surrender to the opinions of others. It means being a conformist whose references are the same as everyone else's. That's a path straight to dullness, sameness, and psitacism.
    Ultimately Peterson is terrified of a changing world that doesn't have the cultural references of his childhood that he's come to value as the touchstone. Instead of encouraging viewers to be audacious and engage with the modern ideas and to take a risk on new books whose "value" hasn't yet calcified, he urges them to play it safe. What a boring man and what boring advice to anyone who truly wants to open his mind to new thoughts.
    By the way, if we're going by number of citations as the value of a book, I'm dutybound to remind you all that Marx and Chomsky are among the two most quoted persons in academia. Strangely enough, though both more than fulfill Peterson's own criterion, books by both of them are absent from his list.

  • @devinreese1397
    @devinreese1397 8 дней назад

    This is so ludicrous.

  • @nikosgeorgakopoulos9580
    @nikosgeorgakopoulos9580 17 дней назад +1

    Women are excluded ?

  • @Scorpion75_
    @Scorpion75_ Год назад +20

    Agreed. The book of fiction known as the Bible has influenced innumerable works in the past several thousand years. It's all there. Man v man. Man v world. Man learns lesson. Man suffers loss. Man celebrates victory.

    • @anderjilly
      @anderjilly Год назад

      I believe the Bible is nonfiction

    • @mr.retrohale6673
      @mr.retrohale6673 Год назад +10

      Proof that it's fiction because I've never seen it in that section?

    • @Scorpion75_
      @Scorpion75_ Год назад +1

      My assumption of fiction@@mr.retrohale6673 is due in part to the way opposing religious people view their "works of god" comparatively to the Bible and Christian's view of others. Non believe the ridiculous narrative in the others. They all can't be true. Why would any be considered as Devine if all are not?

    • @mr.retrohale6673
      @mr.retrohale6673 Год назад +4

      @@Scorpion75_ simple science my man. You can't make something out of nothing. You can go as far back as you want and someone had to create it

    • @matthewgallant3622
      @matthewgallant3622 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@mr.retrohale6673 You can’t prove a negative. It’s like proving that mermaids don’t exist. I can’t show you proof that there isn’t a mermaid in the ocean. That doesn’t mean mermaids must exist. But scientifically a being that’s half human could not survive underwater. The Bible is full of impossible things. Whether they’re true is irrelevant. The lessons are what’s relevant and it’s that weedy debate that’s caused centuries of struggle.

  • @krukrok5218
    @krukrok5218 Год назад +20

    The best fiction book is Bible

    • @ApexTheory
      @ApexTheory Год назад +22

      You mean the best non-fiction historical book?

    • @krukrok5218
      @krukrok5218 Год назад +17

      @@ApexTheory no. The best fiction book.

    • @fitoweiwei7385
      @fitoweiwei7385 9 месяцев назад

      Your statement about the bible is fiction.

    • @tbobtbob330
      @tbobtbob330 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@krukrok5218Your comment is exactly the sort of smug foolishness a 15-yo boy would spout.

    • @Jesus_IsKing11
      @Jesus_IsKing11 4 месяца назад +2

      Jesus loves you bro please accept him as your Lord and savior you won’t regret it!

  • @Heart101
    @Heart101 8 дней назад +1

    Peterson's list is a little too narrow and parochial for the modern world. The canon for a globalized 21st century should include not only the Bible, but also the Tao Te Ching, the Quran, the Bhagavad Gita, not to mention the works of Shankara, Maimonides, Avicenna and Rumi, no name but a few.

  • @markb.howard1660
    @markb.howard1660 Год назад +4

    The reading of antiquated fiction doesn’t help you on the modern world. It’s just an ego flex for weak minds...

    • @worldobserver3515
      @worldobserver3515 Год назад

      What a dumb comment.

    • @tomaswhelan9375
      @tomaswhelan9375 Год назад +8

      Lol

    • @poisenwhafflechicken
      @poisenwhafflechicken Год назад +8

      that literally makes no sense. our world has been created and structured upon these 'antiquated fictions'? how ignorant can one be? I'm not saying that it's empirically true either (which does not matter entirely, the history of humanity's progression is what is to be known and for what reasons). your comment lacks depth.

    • @AlphaDeltaRomeo
      @AlphaDeltaRomeo Год назад +2

      Oh really? Read The Wanting Seed by Anthony Burgess and see what timeline we are at in that book! It’s also a canonical book in regards to Sodom and Gomorrah 😇

    • @matthewgallant3622
      @matthewgallant3622 9 месяцев назад +6

      The modern world exists because of the antiquated world. It’s the foundation we live on. The modern world is not separate and one day our time will be antiquated as well.