The "Don't-want-to-face-them-in-January Bowl" is an excellent one line summarization of this game. Underrated aspect is going to be GB's run blocking against a pretty stout run defending Seattle front--if GB can't get Jacobs going and Love is under a lot of pressure, that could spell disaster for the green and gold (on offense anyway). Much easier said than done however
Agreed. If Jacobs can run & keep the GB offense on the field, likely Geno Smith will make mistakes & Seattle will not be able to catch up. If Jacobs can't find a rhythm, Love will be the one making mistakes.
i acutally dont think so, if commanders wins this week aganist NO and green bay loses they fall down to the 7th seed to play aganist philly, green bay still has a hard scedule left and washington has a easy scedule. i dont see green bay beating detriot in the divsional round. i ca nsee them beating philly but not detriot
@tarasgubarik it would a possible wildcard match. So far GB hasn't lost to a single team with a worse record this year, and the 6th seed gets either the winner of the NFC West (GB is 3-0 against) or NFC South (less likely). Although, I am assuming another loss to the Vikings. Not sure about the Washington schedule though
It seems, based on the comment section, that people are still sleeping on the Hawks. During their 4 game winning streak, they haven’t given up more than 21 points, and that game against the Jets, 7 of those points were on special teams. So defensively the last 4 games, the defense (which is a major contributor to winning championships) has given up an average of 13.75 points, whereas the Packers in that span have given up an average of an even 20. This will be a battle of defenses, and whichever team can create turnovers will win. The home team is dominant in this series, and that shouldn’t change here. Packers 17 Seahawks 21 GO HAWKS!!
I would point out the obvious. In the Seahawks last 4 games, they played a terrible Jets team, a 49ers team that was seriously injured, & twice against a weak Cardinals team. What Seattle does in these next two home games will determine their season & earn respect from others. Hoping they can go 2-0.
I disagree that GB lacks an elite OL. PFF has them as the second best pass pro line, just behind #1. A bad game vs an aggressive defense is allowed every now and again
@@madbohem SEA isn't aggressive. They blitz 12th least. DET blitzes 3rd most, which would be higher if Hutchinson was out from the start. They also don't have a particularly good pass rush, either
@@SidelineSteve Seahawks are aggressive, they just rarely need to rush more than 4 to get pressure. Blindly going off numbers leads to statements that just aren’t true, like “Seahawks aren’t aggressive” or “Seahawks don’t have a good pass rush”. 🤣. Also if you think there isn’t a lot of flawed subjective evaluation included in PFF numbers you’re simply wrong.
You guys need to go & watch Kurt Benkerts 3 minute long video, as to why green bays line had a bad game. It was because of the way the center was doing the silent snap. He was looking back through his legs, & when he picked his head up, they were snapping the ball. Detroit was able to key on that. & was 3 yards past the line of scrimmage, by the time the ball was getting to J Love.
Seattle had 3 of their starting D Line out early in the season in Murphy, Williams and Reed. They are all back and rounding into form and could be the difference against this increasingly suspect Packers O Line. I thought the Packers were poor against the Lions patchwork D last week. The Packers just don't seem to have a leader or alpha on the offence or defence which is how their WR potpourri can hurt them. They have no one that demands the ball in gotta have it situations, and no defensive player to turn to for that clutch play. I think Seattle could win, and put a severe dent in the Packers hype.
@@thomaschurch7686 I'm sure the Packers were thrilled to beat the spread and be eliminated from the division race against a D full of back ups and practice squad players. At least they are probably starting to realise that they are not a SB contender. The Seahawks will probably remind them of that again this week.
The "Don't-want-to-face-them-in-January Bowl" is an excellent one line summarization of this game. Underrated aspect is going to be GB's run blocking against a pretty stout run defending Seattle front--if GB can't get Jacobs going and Love is under a lot of pressure, that could spell disaster for the green and gold (on offense anyway). Much easier said than done however
Agreed. If Jacobs can run & keep the GB offense on the field, likely Geno Smith will make mistakes & Seattle will not be able to catch up. If Jacobs can't find a rhythm, Love will be the one making mistakes.
Also a decent chance that these teams face each other again in the playoffs. Should be a lot of fun
i acutally dont think so, if commanders wins this week aganist NO and green bay loses they fall down to the 7th seed to play aganist philly, green bay still has a hard scedule left and washington has a easy scedule. i dont see green bay beating detriot in the divsional round. i ca nsee them beating philly but not detriot
@tarasgubarik it would a possible wildcard match. So far GB hasn't lost to a single team with a worse record this year, and the 6th seed gets either the winner of the NFC West (GB is 3-0 against) or NFC South (less likely). Although, I am assuming another loss to the Vikings. Not sure about the Washington schedule though
It seems, based on the comment section, that people are still sleeping on the Hawks. During their 4 game winning streak, they haven’t given up more than 21 points, and that game against the Jets, 7 of those points were on special teams. So defensively the last 4 games, the defense (which is a major contributor to winning championships) has given up an average of 13.75 points, whereas the Packers in that span have given up an average of an even 20. This will be a battle of defenses, and whichever team can create turnovers will win. The home team is dominant in this series, and that shouldn’t change here.
Packers 17
Seahawks 21
GO HAWKS!!
I would point out the obvious. In the Seahawks last 4 games, they played a terrible Jets team, a 49ers team that was seriously injured, & twice against a weak Cardinals team. What Seattle does in these next two home games will determine their season & earn respect from others. Hoping they can go 2-0.
Cant wait to hear how Green Bay lost this game instead of how Seattle won it
Can't wait to hear how Green Bay won this game instead of how Seattle lost it (realistic rendition of ur comment)
Can’t wait to hear what Seattle did wrong in the loss instead of praising the packers for beating yall
@@showtimejojo274jordan love gonna get destroyed by the defense, bad qb gonna throw 2+ interceptions
Would make sense, GB are contenders
@@Thb1990now watch Love play his best game of the season
I disagree that GB lacks an elite OL. PFF has them as the second best pass pro line, just behind #1. A bad game vs an aggressive defense is allowed every now and again
well good, they are allowed one this weekend in that case
PFF is flawed in so many different ways. Green Bay has a good O-line but it certainly isn’t elite.
@@madbohem SEA isn't aggressive. They blitz 12th least. DET blitzes 3rd most, which would be higher if Hutchinson was out from the start. They also don't have a particularly good pass rush, either
@@skibum6220 Okay then what do u use to evaluate OL that's quantitative?
@@SidelineSteve Seahawks are aggressive, they just rarely need to rush more than 4 to get pressure. Blindly going off numbers leads to statements that just aren’t true, like “Seahawks aren’t aggressive” or “Seahawks don’t have a good pass rush”. 🤣. Also if you think there isn’t a lot of flawed subjective evaluation included in PFF numbers you’re simply wrong.
Love listening to these guys, in depth knowledge and insight. Much appreciated
You guys need to go & watch Kurt Benkerts 3 minute long video, as to why green bays line had a bad game. It was because of the way the center was doing the silent snap. He was looking back through his legs, & when he picked his head up, they were snapping the ball. Detroit was able to key on that. & was 3 yards past the line of scrimmage, by the time the ball was getting to J Love.
The Link will be loud!!
loud to lose? enjoy bub
@@bob_ohms2low75don’t worry you’ll be cutting cheese on the way home
@@bob_ohms2low75you have zero reason to be this confident
So pumped for this game! Def should be a fun one to watch
.. Geno's restaurant will be open Sunday 5:30 pt
well, if I can Grubb like last Sunday then I will be one fat, happy seahawks fan
Seattle had 3 of their starting D Line out early in the season in Murphy, Williams and Reed. They are all back and rounding into form and could be the difference against this increasingly suspect Packers O Line. I thought the Packers were poor against the Lions patchwork D last week. The Packers just don't seem to have a leader or alpha on the offence or defence which is how their WR potpourri can hurt them. They have no one that demands the ball in gotta have it situations, and no defensive player to turn to for that clutch play. I think Seattle could win, and put a severe dent in the Packers hype.
31 points off that depleted backfield in Detroit. Plus if you bet on the Packers in Vegas then you beat the spread and won..
@@thomaschurch7686 I'm sure the Packers were thrilled to beat the spread and be eliminated from the division race against a D full of back ups and practice squad players.
At least they are probably starting to realise that they are not a SB contender. The Seahawks will probably remind them of that again this week.
You obviously do not know this team. Jacobs can easily impose his will. Any of the receivers can go off and Kraft will run over their ass.
besides JSN DK and Lockett..who has gotten 100 yards recieving?
4 actually with nwosu
Jaire, McKinney, and Williams are all healthy and full participants. Hafley will get aggressive again. Should be a great game!
Still dead last in the league with drop back success, and 29th in pressure. Not a good stat line against Geno, JSN, DK, and Fant.
Geno > Love under pressure 💯
As long as Geno ❤ do sleep 💤… Go hawks 💚 💙!!!
Increasingly suspect O-line?! Um..okay
Packers win if JLove rocks the green long-sleeve underneath the white away jersey like Favre/Rodgers.
Packers got this game go pack go
Go Hawks!!