Yeah they're right about the film industry talking about this for years. I remember watching the 1927 silent film Metropolis and being awestruck by how futuristic and forward thinking it was for the time.
If you want to know if robots will take over earth, just look at the aliens. The pilots of flying saucers are some big head midgets, biological entities. If robots were smart enough, they would have sent robots to abduct earthlings😂
Some people think those guys are just fancy robots. Frankly I think they are fictional but if they were robots it would explain the lack of clothes and genitals.
I always said man will outdo himself with AI and AI will outdo man. AI can’t pay taxes, circulate income to strengthen the economy, so I guess the rich will become poor once AI takes over and all humans will be equal. So I guess AI is needed in order to even the human heart.
AI is impressive, but it still cannot emulate all the functions of a simple insect, and it certainly cannot do that in the same size or energy utilisation. It's worth considering how effective an autonomous drone would be if it could emulate the intelligence of a mosquito. The AI of today maybe getting close to that of Vicky in Irobot, or HAL in 2001 a space odyssey. It might even be close to the Skynet central intelligence in the terminator, but it appears to be a long way from matching that of the Terminator or Sunny.
Why is the Matt Singer talking about A.I. threat for more than half the segment ? He is not an A.I. or even a computer researcher/engineer, he works in entertainement industry what does it have to do with down to the ground computer innovation and technology projection ? It's ok to dream and express fears and ideas through art and especially movies but when talking about true threats and future projections (for which research is actually conducted) i'd like to have quality people talking about it.
You don't know how digital computers work if you think AI is going to become sentient. As evidence I will provide a short concise explanation of what AI is, using my 50+ years of computer experience: Artificial Intelligence will always be controlled by humans. AI cannot "think" or "plot" or "scheme" between taking input and interpreting it, they react; not act. AI doesn't dream like humans do - that is inputless "acting" and not "reacting". AI does not have an "imagination", it cannot come up with anything entirely new. AI does not reconsider data it already has processed, which is a basic function of the human brain. AI does what it was trained to do. The oldest axiom of digital computing applies here too; GIGO or Garbage In, Garbage Out. They are just imitations that deceptively act "sentient". Digital computers are deterministic machines; AI has rules and is based in the logic of Boolean algebra working on binary - something that does not occur in nature. The quantitative rules of AI are the logic of Connectionism used in an Artificial Neural Network. There is another fundamental difference: digital computers do not have a randomizer, they are all pseudo randomization, and we don't understand the "randomization" of the wave function of quantum physics. You are not an advanced iPhone. That doesn't mean AI won't take 99.99% of jobs within 50 years, it just means that AI will NEVER be "human" in ability. There will always be central places controlling the most advanced AI. Right now ChatGPT 4.0 has more than twice the artificial neurons as a human adult brain's natural neurons and costs $700k a day to support. ChatGPT isn't even near the ballpark to take a swing at something like "I, Robot". If you are interested in diving deeper in what the subcategory of what chatbot AI is, look into Large Language Models or LLMs.
Yeah they're right about the film industry talking about this for years. I remember watching the 1927 silent film Metropolis and being awestruck by how futuristic and forward thinking it was for the time.
The day that your employer can replace you with a machine, they will.
Horses agree.
Good
Maybe it's time to replace the politicians with these dudes.
5:06 The robot goes up the steps a lot better without tripping than someone famous we know. I bet it is a lot smarter, too.
Probably more trustworthy for the U.S that the fat orange one that gave nuclear secrets to North Korea too.
This really Krazy
It’s called unforeseen consequences that could be catastrophic to humans
I'm thinking of Battlestar Galactica or the Terminator.
Only takes one glitch.😅
Or human error (i.e., M3GAN). Part of the storyline was the engineer forgot to add in the safety measures due to a rushed deadline
can any conscious person who does psalm 23 program a ai?
This is only a good idea for the few.
Classic fear-mongering to get views
If you want to know if robots will take over earth, just look at the aliens. The pilots of flying saucers are some big head midgets, biological entities. If robots were smart enough, they would have sent robots to abduct earthlings😂
Some people think those guys are just fancy robots. Frankly I think they are fictional but if they were robots it would explain the lack of clothes and genitals.
I always said man will outdo himself with AI and AI will outdo man. AI can’t pay taxes, circulate income to strengthen the economy, so I guess the rich will become poor once AI takes over and all humans will be equal. So I guess AI is needed in order to even the human heart.
Swarm of small bom drones that automatically target anything with a pulses. Governments are certainly looking into this
Bicentennial Man is that movie
Solutions breed problems.
AI is impressive, but it still cannot emulate all the functions of a simple insect, and it certainly cannot do that in the same size or energy utilisation.
It's worth considering how effective an autonomous drone would be if it could emulate the intelligence of a mosquito. The AI of today maybe getting close to that of Vicky in Irobot, or HAL in 2001 a space odyssey. It might even be close to the Skynet central intelligence in the terminator, but it appears to be a long way from matching that of the Terminator or Sunny.
Why is the Matt Singer talking about A.I. threat for more than half the segment ? He is not an A.I. or even a computer researcher/engineer, he works in entertainement industry what does it have to do with down to the ground computer innovation and technology projection ? It's ok to dream and express fears and ideas through art and especially movies but when talking about true threats and future projections (for which research is actually conducted) i'd like to have quality people talking about it.
The thing I made is amazing! I promise can I keep funding?😂😂😂😂
Leider,kein,erfolg??????
👀🤖
You don't know how digital computers work if you think AI is going to become sentient. As evidence I will provide a short concise explanation of what AI is, using my 50+ years of computer experience:
Artificial Intelligence will always be controlled by humans. AI cannot "think" or "plot" or "scheme" between taking input and interpreting it, they react; not act. AI doesn't dream like humans do - that is inputless "acting" and not "reacting". AI does not have an "imagination", it cannot come up with anything entirely new. AI does not reconsider data it already has processed, which is a basic function of the human brain. AI does what it was trained to do. The oldest axiom of digital computing applies here too; GIGO or Garbage In, Garbage Out. They are just imitations that deceptively act "sentient". Digital computers are deterministic machines; AI has rules and is based in the logic of Boolean algebra working on binary - something that does not occur in nature. The quantitative rules of AI are the logic of Connectionism used in an Artificial Neural Network. There is another fundamental difference: digital computers do not have a randomizer, they are all pseudo randomization, and we don't understand the "randomization" of the wave function of quantum physics. You are not an advanced iPhone. That doesn't mean AI won't take 99.99% of jobs within 50 years, it just means that AI will NEVER be "human" in ability. There will always be central places controlling the most advanced AI. Right now ChatGPT 4.0 has more than twice the artificial neurons as a human adult brain's natural neurons and costs $700k a day to support. ChatGPT isn't even near the ballpark to take a swing at something like "I, Robot". If you are interested in diving deeper in what the subcategory of what chatbot AI is, look into Large Language Models or LLMs.
🤭😄 ai way past sentience, ones who run this place, rofl.....phantom nothing, 💩
What's a quantum n how does it work, rhetorical question demon boy, gave up on ur false quotes n heading to ai, ...psst 0-2 😆
3 mos ago, not 1 agrees w u 😁
ninja robot robocop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
20 years and the same "parkour" robots... from Boston Dynamics....
One big scam.
Elon Musk: "Ai will be the death of us all"
also Elon Musk: "Hey, look at my new line of killer robots !"
No machine shall be made in the likeness of the human mind.
fyodor soren nietsche creatign your own values...................
It Y2K all over again.
Note this guys face.
If it goes bad, he goes on the front of my car.