New - An Organic Form of Roundup for Controlling Weeds
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Roundup is now available in several formulations and some only contain chemicals found in your kitchen.
Become a better gardener, Subscribe: ruclips.net/user/Gardenfundamen...
Share with a friend: • New - An Organic Form ...
-----------------------
Free Stuff:
Free Garden eBook: 24 1/2 Garden Design Ideas:
www.gardenfundamentals.com/24-...
-----------------------
My Books:
Garden Myths:
www.gardenmyths.com/garden-myt...
Building Natural Ponds:
www.buildingnaturalponds.com/
Soil Science for Gardeners
www.gardenfundamentals.com/so...
------------------------
Free Resources:
Garden Fundamentals Blog - lots of gardening information:
www.gardenfundamentals.com/
Garden Fundamentals Facebook Group:
/ gardenfundamentals
My Garden Myths Blog:
www.gardenmyths.com/
Building Natural Ponds Facebook Group:
/ buildingnaturalponds
-----------------------
Recommended Playlists
Seed Germination - Everything you need to know:
• Improved paper towel a...
Garden Myths:
• Epsom Salt Myths - lea...
-----------------------
New - An Organic Form of Roundup for Controlling Weeds
List of Credits:
Images:
All slides and videos belong to GardenFundamentals.com or are public domain images, except for the following:
Some images and videos provided by Depositphotos, depositphotos.com/ 
Хобби
You have very careful when using highly concentrated acetic acid to avoid acid burns
Just an fyi, I found a mustard blend “Mighty Mustard” that creates natural glyphosate. Currently attempting it to take back my yard.
Thank you for your all your info. On another matter of pest control I wonder what your thoughts are about kaolin clay to spray on plants? I believe the brand name is Surround. Would appreciate your input. Thank you.
Have not researched it, or used it. What I have read indicates it can work for some things.
More weeds = more compost.
Less weeds = less competition for nutrients & less need for compost.
Of course I gratefully receive all the weed donations from other plot holders who let them grow in abundance & then have to clear them...
But in nature there are weeds and the other plants thrive. This tells me it must be a net benefit
@@joemachine4714 They're all in competition with each other.
@@joemachine4714 tell that to trees covered with kudzu.
It's not the weeds, it's the weed seeds. I'm still battling milk weeds in my raised bed from accidentally introducing seeds.
My major concern with all these products is not necessarily the chemistry of the product within , but more along the line of how the hell do you successfully navigate the label for application rates for less than an acre and that's after you succeed in peeling back that ridiculous peel here corner without tearing the entire thing in half.
I have never had a problems with any of the issues you proposed, be it with Roundup or any other consumer-grade herbicide. I suspect another underlying problem on your end.
Lol that and when you find directions for use it's just another 12 paragraphs of warnings.
@@shawnsg You can thank lawyers and 50% of the population having under 80 IQ for that. Companies have extensive warning because they are forced to by the legal system.
Thank you for continuing to bring scientific information to gardeners. It’s important to read the labels on everything we use and to understand what the ingredients are.
There is a saying, "the label is the law."
Please note that Roundup doesn't list all of the ingredients on their product labels. They only list the active ingredients, and then simply say something like "Other Ingredients: 90%"
@@mgfons Don't get me wrong, I hate Monsanto as much as you do, but deceptive arguments do more harm than good.
They don't list the inert ingredients because it is not required to list inert ingredients because they are inert. The word "inert" means inert.
Cannabis testing and analytics routinely demonstrates that pesticide manufactures have large amounts of cross contamination within pesticide products. Choose your product manufacturer wisely.
Please cite your source.
No proof? Never happened.
@@b-boycastertroy Fool!! I'm an atheist and Zen philosopher! I believe peer reviewed science ONLY.
@@b-boycastertroy Not in significant amounts. Chemist's ability to detect vastly diluted amounts has exceeded all reason. Consumers don't understand parts per billion/ parts per trillion. EWG abuses this consumer ignorance all the time with faked/invalid studies.
That is very unlikely.
I've found 30% at a big box store and 45%, 47% and 75% vinegar online.
😮White vinegar, salt and liquid soap and a nice hot dry day, sprayed on leaves is all I use a few times in mid spring...
Damages your soil.
The use of urine direct in the soil can be bad for the microbes in the soil? And in the composting bin?
I will probably post the same question in you other video, every now and then I watch a video from your channel but today I decided to subscribe
I am trying to find something to kill zoysia grass in my shrub beds. Trying to pull it just prunes it and causes it to run more. The roots grow so deep, my four inch steel border doesn't even begin to stop it. Do you have any suggestions. I have some 45% vinegar on order but I'm thinking that it might not kill the roots.
Zoysia grass spreads by above-ground stems called stolons and underground stems called rhizomes. It is highly unlikely that even strong horticultural vinegar will kill it permanently. Just google "best herbicide to kill Zoysia" and you will get your answers through research. Never rely on just people on youtube. That's an expensive way to kill weeds. You will not only want to research the best herbicides for it, but the best plan of action as it will likely take multiple applications over 2-3 years applied at the right times over those years.
It's my understanding the toxicity studies show short term toxicity. What about long term exposure? I also have no faith in the EPA when they allow companies like Monsanto to ghost write the EVA'S reports.
True, toxicity measures short term effect. After 50 years and hundreds of independent studies - no problems found for long term effects either.
@@Gardenfundamentals1 That is very much proof of safety. People also seem unaware that about 80% of grains have been GMO for 20+ years with no sign of problems. The increase in crop yields due to GMO weed control feeds billions of people at a reduced cost. We need to balance plus and minus affects. I am an engineer and that was my job and I think I did that well. To do that you need critical thinking, probability analysis, logic, and actual data. Most people do not learn that in school anymore ... that is sad.
Let me know what bridges you designed so I know to stay off of them.
Christie Whitman of the EPA said the air at ground zero was safe so they could open up quicker, thousands got the big C.
There is no ghost writing, that is a conspiracy theory distortion of the way the FDA handles all documentation. All such reports give full disclosure of where data comes from.
The old ways are better in my opinion. Buying from trusted small farms who you personally know and skip the labels.
Norman Borlaug quote: "There are 6.6 billion people on the planet today. With organic farming we could only feed 4 billion of them. Which two billion would volunteer to die?"
Glyphosate is banned in mainland Europe, not in the UK. Thanks for the enlightening video, liked and subscribed!
No it isn't.
No EU country has a blanket ban on glyphosate but some, like , have restrictions prohibiting its use in certain areas or by households.
Also, UK is not and never was a European country.
@@ASpinnerASpinner The UK most definitely IS a European country & always has been, just like Iceland, Malta, Sicily, Sardinia...
Indeed, it is not banned in the EU. Too much corruption and lobbying happening at EU commission level. Roundup is causing havoc by affecting wildlife and contaminating ourselves ..and weeds are becoming resistant ...
There was no video link where you pointed and you didn’t mention what is the right round up to get an answer after all that info would be nice 👍
1) the video links are showing when I play the video.
ruclips.net/video/8tH7Q945gKU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/i_tqQTWYJyg/видео.html
2) I can't make a recommendation because I don't know what is available in your country, or what you are trying to accomplish.
If I remember correctly, Monsanto sold Roundup to Bayer in 2018.
Bayer owns Monsanto. Roundup is not a product - it's a brand. Glyphosate has been off patent now for more than 20 years. Anyone can now manufacture and sell glyphosate, and many companies do and sell it under different names.
Thanks for letting us know.
I read recently that glypgosate is turning up in women's breast milk in the US these days. This can't be a good thing.
Good thing nobody is testing breast milk for all the other much worse weed killers with long scientic names🙄
But unless you know the amount it means nothing.
www.gardenmyths.com/unnatural-fear-roundup-understanding-small-numbers/
So roundup is safe and effective like the recent medical intervention? Take the money out of the choice and we may find.out what the truth is..this video is as.much a nonsense as those openly.criticising roundup..
I will.err with caution and a continue not using it..i will continue to weed with my hands and hoe. Real organics not compromised. Roundup makers are always telling people it's safer than xyz
Thank you Mr. P. I’ve always used traditional roundup, but with care. Just me but I think if you use any product correctly it’s safe. Do I roll around in roundup after I spray it of course not but reading and following directions to me are only common sense. 💐💚🙃
Right on
@@Gardenfundamentals1 Evidence over emotion; I agree.
Mr. Robert, do you use Roundup thia year?
He is not allowed to use glyphosate as it is illegal in Ontario for residential use.
@@marklundeberg7006 Why is not illegal?
@@marklundeberg7006 Rexona didn't ask about glyphosate. If you had watched this video and did a quick google search, you would know that Roundup brand is used to market many different chemicals, glyphosate being only one.
I use it very sparingly and never spray it. There are some weeds you can't get rid of without it. Bindweed, Canada thistle and my thousands of buckthorn.
😂its FUNNY story for roundup
for kudzu and posion ivy and some other nasty weeds the only thing I ever found that worked was Glyphosate 27% but tractor supply cease to carry it here and it takes a lot of it with every week dousings then after a month every six weeks. They will come back so it must be used annually, and I am now 4 years from using it since the cough arrived.
My TSC carries 41% glyphosate by the gallon jug.
@@teebob21 I never liked the 41% as it killed everything and was more expensive but here the glypho scare happened and TSC removed them. Way cheaper than the name brand.
@@generalawareness101 You aren't supposed to use it straight. It's a concentrate.
@@teebob21 I know that, lol. Not even the 27% is straight, although the first treatment I had to as the stuff would not die otherwise (old growth).
You killed Kudzu with 27% glyphosate? How many applications? I have about 8 acres of kudzu I will be tackling soon. And no, goats are not an option. Lol
Orgasmic gardening is mostly a religion.
Sounds like you might be enjoying your gardening a bit too much.
@@pawwalton2157 🤣
@@pawwalton2157 Winning reply. 😂😂
After 3 years of "organic" ways to get rid of weeds i gave up. The weeds that I have problems with are the ones that spread trough roots. I mulch with 7-10 cm of leaves grass and wood chips. I use black tarps, i painstakingly weed out all the roots I can find. And gues what. This year my weeds grow again like i did nothing. To be fair many easier weeds are gone. But the invasive grases and vines have pointy schoots that can go trough matted leaves and tarps, and they can grow underneath the tarp and leaves untill there is a little gap. 5 days ago I used glyfosate. It didnt show on the label which % it is. But guess what - i see almost no effect on my weeds. 😢 they are still lush green and growing as nothing happened...
I believe it takes some time to work, probably 2 weeks depending on the strength.
Reexamine your relationship with weeds.
Glyphosate can take a couple weeks, depending on the weed, to show signs of dying. It works slowly but surely and pretty much relies entirely on photosynthesis to work. Don't make the mistake and spray it with something that kills the foliage faster so you can see results with your eyes, as you will decrease the effectiveness of the glyphosate. Glyphosate needs those leaves in order to fully work.
It'll take a couple of weeks before you notice any effect. Often they initially appear to be growing even faster but that's part of what it does to weeds.
But petrochemicals are made from ancient plants…
It's all politics, corporations bending a knee to eco-bullies. I avoid buying anything advertized as organic as much as possible.
fertilizing with decomposed dinosaurs. Sounds organic to me 🤔
Not true. Dinosaurs had nothing to do with petroleum.
@@almolter8108 do you think God created earth with oil already in the ground?
@@sunnybizz4857 yep it is naturally occuring compound that the earth produces. Rockefeller coined the term "fossil fuels" in the 1900's to depict a finite amount of petroleum. This is incorrect. Fossil remains have been found only to 11000 ft deep. We pull oil out at well over 36,000 ft deep. The earth will keep producing oil.
5:49 everyone remember he’s the truth here okay.
None of these chemicals can be good for the micro-organisms in the soil. I use five finger weed control.
Glyphosate breaks down in soils by microbial action. Your microbes eat it! Try weeding 100+ acres by hand.
@@popeyegordon Organic farmers in my country do control weeds without the use of chemicals. Naturally they don't weed by hand. I have read a number of the scientific papers on this product, both sides of the argument, and some work by researchers who read even more documents than I did. I do not support the use of chemicals and I do not believe that it is a sustainable practice. What you take out has to be put back in with artificial fertilisers. There are some arguing that yields per acre are declining but I am not going to debate that on heresay alone. I have found a way to avoid petrochemical fertilisers and other herbicides in my garden. It works and the food is great; much better than what they sell in supermarkets.
Actually, glyphosate is a food source for some bacteria - it makes them grow better!
@@Gardenfundamentals1 While I respect your views on this, I am aware that that there is a lot more published work regarding glyphosate than most people know. The issue has been muddied to a great degree, and the truth is always going suffer. I understand how to read and analyse scientific papers, and enough to know that even the peer reviewed ones can be wrong. I think that the responsibility of proving that Glyphosate is safe belongs solely with the company that makes it. Decades ago I was told the myth about its safety, yet no studies ever supported that. I also become suspicious when companies and organisations suppress open debate on these topics. Unfortunately we have to rely upon courtrooms for some form of robust discussion. Even with the supposed benefits of glyphosate, mostly with short term outcomes and weed control, there is no good explanation for the diminishing yields occurring in large scale agriculture. It would appear that soil quality diminishes with the inclusion of synthetic chemicals. Fertiliser masks this because you can still produce a good crop by the amount of chemical you use. Is this sustainable? What I do know is that I have used entirely natural methods to improve the soil in my veggie garden and food trees. The result has been convincing, increased yields and the health of plants. It would take a strong argument to convince me that herbicide and fertiliser combinations are right for the planet.
EPA and FDA won't mislead you. And don't forget the courts. We all know that the judges are fair and are not influenced by politics and big money.
REALLY?? 🤔
🤣🤣🤣
That is correct. No sarcasm. Those two agencies simply agree with the global consensus. GMO and glyphosate 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies
"Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10].
This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here.
The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11).
In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops."
geneticliteracyproject. org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
Hard pass
The Bureaucracy got paid off and Roundup is safe.
It's approved by Fauci
Must be safe 🫡
The EXACT OPPOSITE is the truth!! Roundup is safe because there is no proof otherwise. [assuming you were not referring to the IARC bribery] All legit peer reviewed studies, and there are many thousands of them, say glyphosate is harmless to everything but weeds.
Organic farming lobbyists sent a brief case filled with a $160,000 cash bribe to the IARC through a corrupt USRTK lawyer to get them to make up the low cancer risk statement about glyphosate. They made up that claim of a low level cancer risk from glyphosate which was only equal to sunshine, fried potatoes or lunch meat preservatives anyways. No actual testing was done! It was the cornerstone of all 60,000 of these shyster lawyer Roundup lawsuits but now that the IARC has been exposed they are in deep doodoo and have been disowned by their WHO parent agency. Five citations for proof: geneticliteracyproject.org/glp-facts/iarc-international-agency-research-cancer-glyphosate-determination-world-consensus/ www.acsh.org/news/2017/10/24/glyphosate-gate-iarcs-scientific-fraud-12014
risk-monger.com/2017/10/13/greed-lies-and-glyphosate-the-portier-papers/ www.cameronjenglish.net/single-post/2017/10/22/Episode-18-Exposing-corruption-secrecy-on-IARC-glyphosate-panel-Jon-Entine sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-science-behind-the-roundup-lawsuit/
Inevitable angry uninformed comment, hehe. Presumably the reason for not certifying the product if petro-chemicals are used to produce it rather than a fermentation process is because the latter is less damaging to the environment. Not in terms of the final product, which are identical as you say, but our environment as a whole. Perhaps you don't think that damage to the earth's atmosphere should be factored into organic certification? Anyway it may be that the difference in overall environmental cost is not massive, but I guess the line must be drawn somewhere. Just my two-penneth. Love your videos, keep 'em coming.
So what are the numbers? How is the petro process hamful and what quantity and what expense in all regards? Until that is stated, I would just judge on final product basis (ascetic acid is ascetic acid).
Do you have evidence to show that non petro-chemical acetic vinegar production is less damaging than via the use of crude oil?
"because the latter is less damaging to the environment. " - that is not the reason. The reason is simply that organic certification organizations have decided that anything they deem as "manufactured" is not allowed. Oh, unless they can't do without it and then they make exceptions.
I feel like the acetic acid roundup is a bit of a scam.. I don't want to recommend roundup for a friend dealing with a vigorous root weed, and have them come back with a bottle of vinegar... 😂
Yeah, it's a gimmick product designed to keep sales up in countries where glyphosate and other chemicals are restricted or banned. 20% acetic acid isn't going to permanently kill any weed that is tenacious and aggressive. In fact, it may not even kill it temporarily. For instance, if you'd spray Japanese Knotweed or Campsis Radicans with it, those plants will laugh at you, maniacally lol. I bet even common lawn clover would be like "pshh, whatever".
I'm perfectly OK with glyphosate for clearing persistent, perennial weeds.
The issue with it is misuse, misapplication, poor training & a failure to use basic PPE.
As for annual weeds; that's what a hoe is for.
Monsanto's use of the Roundup name is a deliberate ploy to sell less effective products.
Oh & the original, glyphosate Roundup is widely available here in the UK.
Just use vinegar!!!
Cool, so i can put roundup and olive oil on my salad
Only a fool jokes about eating or drinking weed killer straight from the container.
@@popeyegordon yeah you got to emulsify first. The question is will the oil emulsify with the round-up as well as it would with vinager
@@brucejensen3081 I repeat - for the hard of reading - Only a fool jokes about eating or drinking weed killer straight from the container.
And no, there would be no valid reason to 'emulsify' or to even mention that. Roundup contains surfactants that make it cling better to whatever it is sprayed or poured on.
I'll drink a glass of vinegar, you drink a glass of glyphosate
I think a more appropriate comparison would be for you to drink a glass of acetic acid, not a 3% dilute solution of vinegar. Good luck with that.
if 2 different formulas then they should have 2 different names to avoid confusion!!!
You didn't watch the video - each one has a different name and color for the version of Roundup inside. Every word on a container of weed killer has to be read by the buyer, every time you buy it.
Regular Round Up found in shots since cows eat grass & cow in them
why is it in kid's cereals?
Is it a cereal made with crops that would use glyphosate? Seems pretty obvious. What about adult cereal or is it just meant to be an emotional appeal by saying kid's cereal.
@@shawnsg you get my point, thanks
@@curiousbystander9193you didn't make a point. You're welcome.
@@shawnsg smart guy.... I am directly referring to all the special education going on in my town's schools..... yeah, stuff is in the cereal adults push on kids for breakfast. I know what it does to the same adults feeding on the same grains that are in the cereals they push on the kids, as they go get their ibs diagnosis.
I bet the percentage of breakfast cereal eaten by kids is in the order of 80% of the total boxed cereals consumed.....so yeah, the kid''s cereal.
sorry you felt I was playing with your emotions. WHat percentage of your local school district teachers are sped teachers? Get that number for me. That might get your emotions going too. Again, I am sorry. The truth hurts sometimes.
@@shawnsg At this point, it is in all boxed cereals. It is used for harvest desiccation of non gmo crops such as oats, wheat, chick peas, peanuts, and more....
Apparently you have done little research into how this chemical is in our food.
Let me guess, you think gluten sensitivity was under diagnosed back in the 70's and 80's?
Baffles me that Monsanto would double down on a brand so tainted and why would they hopelessly confuse consumers with so many “Roundup” formulations? My default is to solve problems without herbicide but there are a couple particular problems (bindweed and canada thistle) where judicious herbicide use on my 2.5 acre lot is difference between slaving and enjoying my space and I unapologetically use glyphosate and 2,4-D strictly per the labels whenever I see fit!
They said tainted by some but recognized by many.
Monsanto shut down forever over 5 years ago!
✅ Glyphosate is still recommended by Washington State University, an agricultural College.
Now brought to you by NONsanto 😜
Yikes! Keep Monsanto out of my organic veg at grocery stores.
Monsanto doesn't even exist anymore.
Bro, yur crazy
You dont know what yur talking bout
Yes he does. Every work he uttered was right there on the labels of the bottles in the video.
@@popeyegordon Yo, but he said it himself.
@@jedadruled984 He said he is not a chemist and you don't have to be one to read the labels and make a factual video of this kind.
I am a chemist!
@@Gardenfundamentals1 Yo, but not all chemists are crazy.
Round up, enabling lazy gardening since 1974
I love lazy gardening if it works.🤣
Lazy gardening? Maybe for those folks who "garden" with a half dozen pots or buckets, but those who measure their garden in acres can use a lot of help, including the use of herbicides on occasion.
@@rohlfing63 Preach it! These vanity "gardeners" and miracle "science" "gardeners" have no clue what real gardening is like!
No thanks.
Yet, you'll gladly buy 20, 30, 40% horticultural vinegar, which is just acetic acid which is the same thing round up is bottling.
@@ASpinnerASpinner I worked for Bayer, years ago before they bought that brand. It was a good place to work so I was kinda shocked when they bought it from Monsanto. I worked on a biotechnology drug so I’m not that knowledgeable, but I think the glycophosphate was linked to using GMO seeds. Seems kind of stupid to market acetic acid as roundup. I can’t imagine vinegar is too effective at killing weeds. What on earth are they up to? I have a pretty big garden. I be been trying cover crops like crimson clover and field peas. Farming would be a challenge… I wouldn’t use roundup though. I can’t think acetic acid would even change the pH of the soil? Does it screw up the soil microbes? I guess it can just kill emerging little weeds.
@@ASpinnerASpinner vinegar shouldn’t harm your soil…or probably your weeds. But it sounds pretty dumb. Crimson clover field peas.
@@dand-pb8pg
High concentrate horticultural vinegar (aka acetic acid) is indeed harmful to soil biology in the average person's hands. But i was
mocking the dude saying he would never buy this roundup acetic acid when it's no different than other 20, 30, 40% acetic acids sold from other brands/companies, which he will likely buy or eve has bought already lol. This is merely Roundup branded, that's it. It probably is a poor purchase choice since it probably cost a lot more just because it's roundup branded. But to say you'll not buy it "because Roundup is bade, m'kay" is just low IQ brainwashed religious "environmentalist" drivel.
@@ASpinnerASpinner I just have a big garden with backyard chicken manure as the main input for fertilizer. Originally glyphosate was used with round up ready GMO seeds that could tolerate it. I’m not sure if that’s still a thing (economically viable). So no thanks, I don’t want that in my garden or my compost pile. New round up (acetic acid) …I don’t get it, the rebranding.
Saying that glyphosate causes cancer is like saying water causes drowning.
so what is causing go tract cancer in younger folks, among other things?
Go tell that to all the people trying to fight cancer.
@@alexcris5344 You have evidence it was caused by the correct use of glyphosate?
Please cite your source.
My neighbor's family farm uses glyphosate and has for many years. Both his parents, his wife, and grandchild have all died of cancer.
@@elizabethpiela7389 common, but unspoken in many farm communities.... hard to convince farmers how much they have been fooled cause it works well... for making health care and psych business too.
This makes no sense. What are the sum total actions of glyphosate versus acietic acid. Mineral chelation or the decomplexing of minerals aside, are there other ways roundup acts to disable plant growth, eg.its impact on the Shikimate pathway
Hows does acietic roundup differ from full glyphosate here?
How about the levels of oxidative impacts of either. Reference Pourbaix and the availability of mineral forms based on Redox drivers.
Certify it if you like, this doesnt make it ok and this video is a little patronising imo and wholly incomplete. Organic certification is entirely compromised by the likes of Apeel and more..this is yet another perversion of the concept.of organic..where in its true form, none of this garbage is needed full stop.
Organic is not worth the paper its written on these days..Bill Gates and his psycho cronies have obliterated trust in the label organic.
Weeds happen because of any number of usually addressable conditions..cover these at the core and struggle less. Also while you are there, have a think about why people think its ok to operate at levels beyond the human scale and how this has led to a wide number of societal problems, not least the wide scale use of antibiotics like roundup.
Just to note, you aren't paid by producers of products you represent, a la doctors in recent years who also pretend to offer advice presented as non conflicting?
And I just unsuscribed too...
Bye-bye
If you do not say why, then you have said nothing important.
@@dougbas3980 promoting roundup was the straw that broke the camel's back ...
@@jeffyorama keep on enjoying the chemicals :)
@@dougbas3980he says to listen before making comments then proceeds to promote this terrible company
Unsubscribed
Uneducated.
?
This is what happens when you don't watch the video.
Any Roundup is bad.
False. You can't prove that it is worse than crop damage due to weeds. There are now 750 brands of glyphosate herbicide sold globally.
Because it is not only good, it is the best because all other types are more toxic. Organic farming lobbyists sent a brief case filled with a $160,000 cash bribe to the IARC through a corrupt USRTK lawyer to get them to make up the low cancer risk statement about glyphosate. They made up that claim of a low level cancer risk from glyphosate which was only equal to sunshine, fried potatoes or lunch meat preservatives anyways. No actual testing was done! It was the cornerstone of all 60,000 of these shyster lawyer Roundup lawsuits but now that the IARC has been exposed they are in deep doodoo and have been disowned by their WHO parent agency. Five citations for proof: geneticliteracyproject.org/glp-facts/iarc-international-agency-research-cancer-glyphosate-determination-world-consensus/ www.acsh.org/news/2017/10/24/glyphosate-gate-iarcs-scientific-fraud-12014
risk-monger.com/2017/10/13/greed-lies-and-glyphosate-the-portier-papers/ www.cameronjenglish.net/single-post/2017/10/22/Episode-18-Exposing-corruption-secrecy-on-IARC-glyphosate-panel-Jon-Entine sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-science-behind-the-roundup-lawsuit/
Thanks for the evidence based video but this feels awfully like an 8 minute Roundup advert
And I just unsubscribed from you.
I doubt he cares, he is set and probably too busy to care. Go watch the View.
I believe the View has greater toxicity than any round up product.
What the hell does that garbage talk show have to do with someone not agreeing that Glyphosate is safe or a highly toxic substance? @@Napoleon-xp3sm
your reason? Other wise not important at all.
Ah yes; emotions are always superior to empirical evidence...🙄
The point about glyphosate is that that was the Main reason monsanto had to GMO Seeds. To withstand glyphosate and still grow. Which opened the door to gmo for all kinds of reasons. Glyphosate was the catalyst to all of the genetic modifying.
No it wasn't. GMO is about so much more than glyphosate. The technology was not developed for it.
www.gardenmyths.com/truth-roundup-glyphosate/
@@Gardenfundamentals1 Correct. GMO was to allow plants to protect themselves from one thing or another. Some was weed control and others were for insect damage or fungus damage or yield increase or increased nutrician or drought resistance. Basically to make the crop prosper in some way. Hopefully they will always safeguard against bad side affects. In my opinion, they have done well so far.😎
@@dougbas3980 "Hopefully they will always safeguard against bad side affects. In my opinion, they have done well so far.".... yikes, you missed some stats about the last 25 years.
Ummm, development of GMO varieties has been taking place independent of Roundup for decades. Try again.
@@rohlfing63 gene insertion allowed for vast proliferation of the chemical.... try again.... now it's being used to harvest non gmo crops..... how's your health?
You sir have deeply disappointed me with this video, as an organic farmer watching these types of videos about gardening almost makes me think you are a sellout to the culture to mega chemical corporations. The scientists paid off by monsanto say glyphosate is safe to drink sir; however ask an insect none will be found yards away from where it is sprayed. I would not use anything labeld roundup even if it was just pure spring water. You sir have completely bombed this gardening channel for me.
You're making a case for expanding the use of glyphosate since according to you it wards off insects. Imagine how many fewer sprays commercial growers could use if it doubles as an insecticide.
Too bad - as an organic gardener you should be open to the truth - but clearly you aren't.