thank you very much for the illustrative review of both small format primes! Whereas I don't have any issues with the nifty-fifty, here my impressions and minus points about the 17 mm (translated by< google, pardon for any imprecise wordings therefore...): A short focal length, packed relatively compactly, is a good idea. Although the image quality is very good, except for the strong distortion in RAW (which costs image quality when corrected!), I have two points of criticism - the lens is actually much "too small" - measured against the 20 mm 2.0, its size would have been okay and would have fitted in very well with the series, at least with a speed of 2.8 IMPORTANT: that's why the classic B+W S-Pro filters (clear / UV) don't fit - the tube on which the lens hood is attached using a bayonet lock is narrower than the broader filter. Consequence: the filter protrudes slightly over the edge, the attachable bayonet hood no longer fits in! So I had to buy a new B+W Master Clear Filter for 40 E, which makes the following point even more important: - Measured by the mechanical aspects and the low "speed", I find the price too high, actually it should be at least 100 € cheaper I don't understand why Sigma (like many or actually all photo manufacturers unfortunately) doesn't ask the users beforehand about their wishes. In any case, I would have said that I find so much compactness for so little speed problematic. A bit bigger, but F 3.5 or 2.8 would have been great! I now use it as a second lens next to, for example, the Canon TS - E 17 mm shift lens - at least the focal length and perspective match So, dear company Sigma: set up a customer advisory board, then everything will be better
まきりなChはSIGMAさんにとって優良な宣伝媒体ですね。写真、機材、家族、語りの塩梅が絶妙。おめでとうございます。
ありがとうございます(^^♪ 妻と色々撮影に出かけて楽しい時間を過ごすことが出来ました(*´▽｀*)
おめでとうございます🎉sigmaさんにfp＋Iシリーズレンズ愛が届きましたね😊
麦の写真にやられました。寄れるは正義ですね👍写りもとても良さそう。
ほんまに正義たと痛感しました。写りもいいっすよ～(^^♪
いや〜これは買いですね！理想の超広角です♪ご紹介いただきありがとうございました☺
唯一無二なコンパクト超広角！買いっスよね～(^^♪
I like this channel because it doesn't blabber too much on video capabilities and just shoots photos which most just focus on
嬉しいです。ありがとうございます👍✨
50mmも17mmもめちゃくちゃ良さそうですねー！！
まきりなさんが楽しそうにされてると欲しくなります🫣
ご視聴ありがとうございます👍✨いいレンズでコンパクトなので最高です(ˊ˘ˋ*) fpどうですか～\( ´˘`)/
良いレンズだと思います。後処理は最低限にして、カメラとレンズの良さを確認するのが良いと思います。私だけかもしれませんが、寒色系が少し写真を支配していますね。森に明るさがない（なかったからかもしれませんが）。それをありのままに見せてくれるのはとてもいいと思います。ありがとうございました。 ウクライナからご挨拶 ))
海外からありがとうございます👍✨写真はほぼそのまんまお出ししていますのでホワイトバランスの加減なんでしょうね～(ˊ˘ˋ*)
いいね！ 安定の谷で 葉っぱ写真～～～～
そうなんです👍✨
sigma愛用者はよきチャンネルですね‼️
ありがとうございます👍✨
まいど😆
やはりSIGMAのボディにはSIGMAのレンズ！相性も抜群で写りもパキパキで美しいですね～！
先行レビュー待ってました～😆
超広角ってあまり使ったことないって仰ってましたよね。使い勝手もかなり良さげでいいんじゃないですか～😁！
新しい沼に嵌っていきそうですね～😆。
もうすっかりSIGMAのインフルエンサーですな😆！国産メーカー頑張れ～～～🤗！！
お役に立てれば嬉しいですね～もっと流行らしたいです(ˊ˘ˋ*)
thank you very much for the illustrative review of both small format primes! Whereas I don't have any issues with the nifty-fifty, here my impressions and minus points about the 17 mm (translated by< google, pardon for any imprecise wordings therefore...):
A short focal length, packed relatively compactly, is a good idea. Although the image quality is very good, except for the strong distortion in RAW (which costs image quality when corrected!), I have two points of criticism
- the lens is actually much "too small" - measured against the 20 mm 2.0, its size would have been okay and would have fitted in very well with the series, at least with a speed of 2.8
IMPORTANT: that's why the classic B+W S-Pro filters (clear / UV) don't fit - the tube on which the lens hood is attached using a bayonet lock is narrower than the broader filter. Consequence: the filter protrudes slightly over the edge, the attachable bayonet hood no longer fits in! So I had to buy a new B+W Master Clear Filter for 40 E, which makes the following point even more important:
- Measured by the mechanical aspects and the low "speed", I find the price too high, actually it should be at least 100 € cheaper
I don't understand why Sigma (like many or actually all photo manufacturers unfortunately) doesn't ask the users beforehand about their wishes. In any case, I would have said that I find so much compactness for so little speed problematic. A bit bigger, but F 3.5 or 2.8 would have been great!
I now use it as a second lens next to, for example, the Canon TS - E 17 mm shift lens - at least the focal length and perspective match
So, dear company Sigma: set up a customer advisory board, then everything will be better
コメント失礼します。
こちらをLUMIXS5のEXテレコン機能を使えば３５mm相当での撮影も可能でしょうか？？？
EXテレコンってよく知らないんですけど、カメラの中の機能ならレンズの連動は関係なさそうなので使えるかなと思いますが、他でも調べてみてください☺️
おぉ！まきりなさん先行レビューおめでとうございます！！
fpのまきりなさんの貢献度は大きかったように思います。17mm これは私もジンバル用（Lマウント）に欲しいです\(//∇//)\
ありがとうございます！AFも早いし動画でも何の問題もないですね～(^_^)/
Fマウントでコシナのカールツァイスレンズが金属製ですごく触り心地が良いんですよね。
感覚的にそんな感じでしょうか？だったら欲しくなっちゃいますね。
しかし私はNikonから抜け出しそうにありません😂
まさにそういう感じなんですよね～それでAFってのがミソ👍✨
フォーカスブリージング初めて見ました!😂
私にもあんまり関係ないのですが、そういう現象らしいです(笑)
SIGMAが欲しくなってしまいましたぞw
(ง •̀ω•́)งﾖｯｼｬｯ
シグマも富士フイルムもOLYMPUS
玄人専用メーカー
そんなことないと思います(ˊ˘ˋ*)