Patents || Part 9 || Patent infringement Case Study || Roche vs Cipla || Patents act, 1970

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 дек 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @VaibhaviW
    @VaibhaviW 11 месяцев назад

    It means that was as good as granting a compulsory license

  • @anujagarwal7992
    @anujagarwal7992 4 года назад +1

    tysm sir. You explained really well.

  • @moithilisaha2298
    @moithilisaha2298 2 года назад

    thankyou , good way of explaining

  • @harshpanwar5963
    @harshpanwar5963 2 года назад +3

    Roche won the case in the end, not Cipla, I think your facts are not complete.

    • @lakshmanansrinivasan8701
      @lakshmanansrinivasan8701 2 месяца назад

      U only think ..u get ur facts right. The decision was given in favor of Cipla ,both in the DHC and SC .

  • @pharmtech1942
    @pharmtech1942 3 года назад

    where they file the case ?

  • @AnasKhan-pe1ze
    @AnasKhan-pe1ze 9 месяцев назад

    Hahahhha roche😅😅😅😅