@@freshrockpapa-e7799 Draftscience is the channel name,I and others have been trying to prove things to him for years but to no avail. I guess that's why you picked up on my incorrect terminology as I was using his wording to appeal to his understanding.
@@Ian.Gostling why don't you make a demonstration showing how dropping a ball from twice the height doesn't get converted to twice the speed? His issue seems to be with kinetic energy so that would make it obvious
Who are you responding to?
@@freshrockpapa-e7799 Draftscience is the channel name,I and others have been trying to prove things to him for years but to no avail.
I guess that's why you picked up on my incorrect terminology as I was using his wording to appeal to his understanding.
@@Ian.Gostling why don't you make a demonstration showing how dropping a ball from twice the height doesn't get converted to twice the speed? His issue seems to be with kinetic energy so that would make it obvious
@@freshrockpapa-e7799 He doesn't deny the 4 x the height 2x velocity.
@@Ian.Gostling if he acknowledges that how does he explain it? The reason is because of kinetic energy
@@freshrockpapa-e7799 He says it's a time dependant force,it's in the gravity only twice as long so it only has twice the energy....