Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
This is fascinating, but this is not to my mind how the word "post-truth" is used. But yes, if you grant him his definition of the word this is great.
We need both-the scientific truth and a collective self-deception. However, they are insufficient-we need the infinite supreme goal too.
Steve Fuller of it.
I don't think it's a huge problem that they invite a progressive into the studio. As long as they also invite people from the other side and make sure it's 50/50.
Who's a progressive?
great
That was interesting, but for some reason he doesn't mention that Democrats are playwrights too
Don't trip over theater, they all on same team
_"mkaaay"_
01:15Why are you bringing THAT much politics into this?
Andrew K. Because politics is important?
I also cringed when he admitted he was a clinton supporter. He would've lost all intellectual credibility for me if he wasn't such a prolific scholar.
I guess it is because of the time he made the video ?
@@doublenegation7870 you are the institute of intellectual credibilty ? I think your comment shows otherwise...
@@ProNarble argumentum ab auctoritate?
disagreeable ESFJ with developed Si and Ne
This is fascinating, but this is not to my mind how the word "post-truth" is used. But yes, if you grant him his definition of the word this is great.
We need both-the scientific truth and a collective self-deception. However, they are insufficient-we need the infinite supreme goal too.
Steve Fuller of it.
I don't think it's a huge problem that they invite a progressive into the studio. As long as they also invite people from the other side and make sure it's 50/50.
Who's a progressive?
great
That was interesting, but for some reason he doesn't mention that Democrats are playwrights too
Don't trip over theater, they all on same team
_"mkaaay"_
01:15
Why are you bringing THAT much politics into this?
Andrew K. Because politics is important?
I also cringed when he admitted he was a clinton supporter. He would've lost all intellectual credibility for me if he wasn't such a prolific scholar.
I guess it is because of the time he made the video ?
@@doublenegation7870 you are the institute of intellectual credibilty ? I think your comment shows otherwise...
@@ProNarble argumentum ab auctoritate?
disagreeable ESFJ with developed Si and Ne