NASAMS: Ukraine's new weapons system explained

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
  • Ukraine is set to receive a new weapons system in its conflict with Russia - the Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems or NASAMS.
    Designed to provide medium to long-range air defence against aircraft, cruise missiles or drones, NASAMS can fire short-range AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles plus the medium-range AIM-120 - identical to the missiles used on fighter aircraft.
    The weapons system is the same one used to defend the White House and Capitol Building in the US.
    More: www.forces.net...
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: forces.net
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    Twitter: / forcesnews

Комментарии • 528

  • @iVilian
    @iVilian Год назад +5

    Hello from Ukraine.
    It's March 2023 and the air defense systems from western countries are helping us a lot. Russia failed to destroy our infrastructure last winter. We shoot down most of the Russian missiles as of now. As a Ukrainian, I am very grateful to all the counties that are contributing to our defense against these terrorist attacks from Russia.
    We still need more systems because of the big area that needs to be covered. AFAIK, we still cannot shoot down the X-22 rocket or the Kinzhal missile. Looking forward to the arrival of the Patriot system.

  • @GTI8855
    @GTI8855 2 года назад +169

    I hope some day Ukraine will have the ability to keep the sky clear of enemy's missiles and planes.

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER 2 года назад +8

      In dreams only

    • @omegaz3393
      @omegaz3393 2 года назад

      @Edka Poik
      Seriously.
      Well, technically, American are behind in rocket science.
      However, the U.S.A. is actually leading. Just because it hasn't deployed hypersonic rockets doesn't mean it doesn't have the technology.
      Russia & China use it as propaganda. Don't let that fool you. Supersonic rockets/missiles have serious issues to be overcome. Going to have to break some laws if physics to fix it.

    • @victorcordeiroifx8277
      @victorcordeiroifx8277 2 года назад +5

      You should be hoping that Ukraine would still be on the map soon and not keeping the sky clear.

    • @ray4ix
      @ray4ix 2 года назад +2

      ​@Edka Poik dude if that was true, they would have full air dominance, their "advanced systems" can't even track himars short range (80km) rocked artillery.

    • @djl5634
      @djl5634 2 года назад +2

      @Edka Poik we are ahead of Russia in missile defense. Thaad can intercept hypersonic icbm missiles at mach23. With a hypersonic warhead that goes mach 8 hypersonic. Sm6 block 6 hypersonic missiles are in service. Hypersonic Dark Eagle hypersonic missiles batterys are in service. X15 hypersonic aircraft developed in the 1960s were well ahead of anything Russia has today. X43a aircraft had the first scram jet hypersonic enjines. X37 hypersonic scram jets aircraft are claimed to be a hypersonic bomber. The Russians were only ahead in ground launch hypersonics. But not anymore.

  • @Monkey-ud8bw
    @Monkey-ud8bw 2 года назад +53

    The Norwegians (Kongsberg) seem to be banging out some great missile and RWS designs lately.

    • @noahd4210
      @noahd4210 2 года назад +6

      This is an American/Norwegian joint development by Raytheon and Kongsberg

    • @MyDagfinn
      @MyDagfinn 2 года назад +30

      @@noahd4210 It is basically a fully Norwegian project where Kongsberg allied with Raytheon for sales purposes and US defence purchase policies plus their missiles.

    • @willw8011
      @willw8011 2 года назад +12

      American missiles and American Radar... so obviously it is Norwegian!

    • @Monkey-ud8bw
      @Monkey-ud8bw 2 года назад +3

      Yep, Raytheon did. This isn’t the only thing that Kongsberg makes and their other stuff is good.

    • @brianhayes4827
      @brianhayes4827 2 года назад +1

      Love their beer too.

  • @john_in_phoenix
    @john_in_phoenix 2 года назад +31

    Basically off the shelf well proven hardware, a new ground launcher and custom network software. It really is an impressive system.

    • @sys3248
      @sys3248 2 года назад

      It wasn't. It's mediocre A2A missiles put on the ground. Buk Missiles which already Ukraine operating are better than it.

    • @eyeball1u
      @eyeball1u 2 года назад +8

      @@sys3248 so why does the US use this system to protect the White House, if there is something better? Do you not think the US can afford the best?

    • @-BuddyGuy
      @-BuddyGuy 2 года назад

      @@eyeball1u Look I'm not saying BUKs are the best but if they were, they still wouldn't be used to protect the white house

    • @eyeball1u
      @eyeball1u 2 года назад

      @@-BuddyGuy Fair enough. I still find it hard to believe the US would choose a mediocre system to protect its most important building.

    • @john_in_phoenix
      @john_in_phoenix 2 года назад +8

      @@sys3248 The Buk missiles Ukraine has are 1985 vintage. NASAMS missile is an evolved sea sparrow missile (RIM-162) with an AMRAAM seeker (called AMRAAM ER). Thus it has a much longer range, with the enhanced anti-air capabilities of AMRAAM. Not exactly mediocre, but certainly aimed at a different function. Certainly, the newer Buk systems Russia uses have excellent range and altitude capabilities and are great to shoot down civilian airliners. Much more mobile and able to follow advancing troops, however, the Ukrainians will be using their NETWORKED NASAMS to defend cities against cruise and ballistic missiles. This is what it is actually designed for, the missiles are significantly smaller than any of the Buk missiles. The ability to network with existing counter-battery radar means an advanced warning for low-flying cruise missile intercepts, which gives it a distinctly longer range and a greater probability of intercept. This would also mean Russia would have to better plan cruise missile courses to avoid this since the ability to launch a missile from 100 miles away against a target not on the launching system radar, with mid-course updates is a pretty useful feature. Correct me if I'm wrong, but a Buk can shoot what its radar sees, and not what another Buk system 100 miles away can see. This gives Ukraine a much more integrated battlespace picture with significantly more capabilities than their 45-year-old Buks. Certainly thinking it is an A2A missile shows you actually know nothing about the system, the missile it uses has actually never been carried on an aircraft. The rocket motor is different, the actual seeker is the part that comes from the most current version of the AMRAAM, with an extended range rocket motor designed for launching from ships.

  • @David-tm4yj
    @David-tm4yj 2 года назад +35

    Short to medium range air to air missiles launched from the ground, flaming ingenious use of what most western militaries have lots of lying around. The Ukrainians need all the help we can send them ( that neighbor from hell is a right royal pain in the posterior) 😖

    • @JohnWick-stardawg
      @JohnWick-stardawg 2 года назад +3

      This is the worst episode of neighbours from hell,ever. The only good parts are the Russian blooper videos. My favourite is the grenade through the sunroof.

    • @rickc661
      @rickc661 2 года назад

      Yea, what is in reserve today, not ordered and built in 2024.... to me, maybe the English Rapier 2000, recently or currently being replaced with a totally new system. Can Ukraine receive 50 or even 100 units, NOW ? of course large number of crew training, not 20 guys. can Ukraine spare sending 200, 300 guys at a time for a month ?

    • @jjsmthr
      @jjsmthr 2 года назад +1

      @@rickc661 of course they can, there are 40 mil population in Ukraine. But west would never provide Ukraine with modern fresh of the shelves equipment and arms. So far they sent only old stuff and often in bad conditions (reports say only 1/3 of us sent m777 are currently operational, others need heavy repairs/maintainance). With some small exceptions, for which they literally had to beg and constantly remind. It's a shame, really.

    • @David-tm4yj
      @David-tm4yj 2 года назад +2

      Well said people, Ukraine CAN spare to send people to the UK for training as has been said there are 40 million of them in Ukraine. They will get the most up to date training in a safe environment, we have a couple of Ukrainians in the place where i work and they are ' the salt of the earth' they are the nicest people you could meet. In my past i have worked with Estonian, Lithuanian and Latvian forces and they were great people and NO love for Russia, it seems that if you were part of the Warsaw pact then only Russia has fond memories of it and not the countries that suffered about 50 years of tyranny.

    • @clearlake7500
      @clearlake7500 2 года назад

      @@rickc661 its too late. They have lost too much troops already that they are having a hard time holding positions. What they need are a munitions. All these systems would have made a difference when the war broke out.

  • @DesasterUA
    @DesasterUA 2 года назад +3

    Big thanks from Ukraine

  • @miloslavsasek5534
    @miloslavsasek5534 2 года назад +3

    Hope it stops the Russian murdering the children

  • @ericconnor8419
    @ericconnor8419 2 года назад +61

    It looks very effective they definitely need it. I hope they will get enough to make a difference.

    • @sergiytokio7295
      @sergiytokio7295 2 года назад

      Russia has shown its true face, which loves repression, executions, violence and the deportation of entire nations.

    • @epoxy1710
      @epoxy1710 2 года назад +1

      Most of them are already destroyed.

    • @ParallelComparison
      @ParallelComparison 2 года назад +1

      @@spudm595 So you are crying like a baby?

    • @badmonkey2222
      @badmonkey2222 2 года назад +1

      @@spudm595 no they only need them in the areas where they're fighting which is in just a small fraction of the country the air defense missiles they can just put in the major cities which are only two or three that they're really concerned about.

    • @Oxley016
      @Oxley016 2 года назад +2

      @@spudm595 Is that so? There have been so many videos coming out with Russian SAMs launching then turning round and going back towards their launchers!

  • @jacksonteller1337
    @jacksonteller1337 2 года назад +6

    I have seen the NASAMS 2 shoot around a building the darnedest thing i ever saw. That means they are ideal for the defense of high end assets even in a city.

  • @jonbroadsword7572
    @jonbroadsword7572 2 года назад +53

    They can deploy it to protect "Important Infrastructure" like the apartment buildings and shopping malls that are being targeted with Russian cruise missiles.

    • @freezedeve3119
      @freezedeve3119 2 года назад +1

      shopping malls next to big railroad

    • @DetroitMicroSound
      @DetroitMicroSound 2 года назад

      A couple battery placed around any of Ukraine's cities will nearly eliminate further attack successes.

    • @frankrenda2519
      @frankrenda2519 2 года назад +6

      ukraine had russian s300 many times better than this toy it diddnt help

    • @DetroitMicroSound
      @DetroitMicroSound 2 года назад

      @@frankrenda2519 NASAMS will stop attacks from the air.

    • @brianhayes4827
      @brianhayes4827 2 года назад +5

      It worked really well on the pentagon on 9/11.

  • @Fre3domAction
    @Fre3domAction 2 года назад +118

    Air defense is vital to Ukraine, we must've been sending them long ago🤨🤨🤨🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🔥🔥

    • @fedorbutochnikow5312
      @fedorbutochnikow5312 2 года назад +7

      I also don't get it why it wasn't sent much earlier to prevent all these deaths.

    • @thelifeofplay7435
      @thelifeofplay7435 2 года назад +2

      They wanted to see if the Ukraines would fold under pressure but they didn’t just like the Vietnamese. It’s going to be a grinding ordeal for both countries.

    • @Hero4fun77
      @Hero4fun77 2 года назад +1

      Should've*

    • @Hero4fun77
      @Hero4fun77 2 года назад +4

      @@thelifeofplay7435 Yes, otherwise NATO's weapons will be in hand of the russia when Ukraine lost.

    • @HBToastedAlmond
      @HBToastedAlmond 2 года назад

      @@fedorbutochnikow5312 I don't think it would have prevented death: it is designed to give death.
      But it might have slowed down the Russian progress

  • @Алекс-ч1л1с
    @Алекс-ч1л1с 2 года назад +15

    Thank you USA and UK for your help and support! You are real friends! Glory to Ukraine! Glory to the USA! Glory to Belarus!!!

    • @dcdennis7355
      @dcdennis7355 2 года назад +1

      @Edka Poik Wow… cranky today? :)

    • @dcdennis7355
      @dcdennis7355 2 года назад

      @Edka Poik I get your point. War is pretty much just pain and horror. It is tragic what humans will do to each other. Thank you for the clarification.

    • @dcdennis7355
      @dcdennis7355 2 года назад

      @Edka Poik Reading the rest of your posts, just one observation. Swallowing Russian propaganda is going to distort your reality. Putin’s regime is not built on truth. No police state is.

  • @joweda6342
    @joweda6342 2 года назад +28

    Good luck Ukraine, stay strong !

  • @deecee1522
    @deecee1522 2 года назад +6

    Putin to Lavrov: "hold my poop bag"

  • @msbull100
    @msbull100 2 года назад +35

    Judging to the video, nasams are very good. Ukraine urgently needs more of them to protect civilians from barbaric bombing of russian orks!

    • @leonteflorinel8808
      @leonteflorinel8808 2 года назад

      You gotta be kidding ! The Nazis of f.Fuckraine are using Nazi US HIMARS to bomb civilian homes, markets every day! Including the ZPP Nuclear Power Plant !!!

    • @D.Frasure
      @D.Frasure Год назад

      Why can't we give them something to hit Moscow?? I want to see long range from Ukraine. bring down hell like Russia is doing to the good citizens of Ukraine. I want to see Moscow in shambles for what they have done.

  • @setoner7405
    @setoner7405 2 года назад +15

    Big thanks from Ukraine 🇺🇦

    • @leonteflorinel8808
      @leonteflorinel8808 2 года назад

      f.Uckraine is dead. Referendum is ending soon! :) SLAVA ROSSIIJA !

    • @D.Frasure
      @D.Frasure Год назад

      Why can't we give them something to hit Moscow?? I want to see long range from Ukraine. bring down hell like Russia is doing to the good citizens of Ukraine. I want to see Moscow in shambles for what they have done.

    • @TheMyringz
      @TheMyringz 2 месяца назад

      @@leonteflorinel8808 You know what, I wont even level myself to my quote you.

  • @ThatCarGuy
    @ThatCarGuy 2 года назад +61

    Not the best range, but use the Aim120C, and the AIM series has so much combat experience, being the best air to air missile to date.

    • @spudm595
      @spudm595 2 года назад

      Now with this weapon it's on to Moscow before the autumn weather sets in just like Hitler and Napoleon before him

    • @richardholmes1920
      @richardholmes1920 2 года назад +8

      Errrm the meteor and asraam would like a word

    • @deanbrown2061
      @deanbrown2061 2 года назад +1

      The D goes much fartherof Aim120D

    • @rickc661
      @rickc661 2 года назад +2

      that is the missile the Norwegian sam units use to protect Washington DC . I'd think 40 mile range would allow for whatever radar used to lock on target well. a good radar, crew training should be easy more effective than the Hand held stingers and others sent to Ukraine earlier. WHY they didn't get appropriate weapons when for example the CIA exactly predicted the post Kyiv battle..... probably no country has reserve stocks of SAMs, except Israel and S.Korea and they have their own issues. from what I understand SAMs are not super high priority for US military or at least weren't

    • @ThatCarGuy
      @ThatCarGuy 2 года назад +7

      @@richardholmes1920 The meteor is worse as it can only be launched at high altitude do to it's ramjet engine. It also needs to be fired from a certain speed as ram/scram jet engines produce 0 thrust on their own. It also has also never been used in combat.
      The ASRAAM is a short range missile and is worse all around and should be compared to the sidewinder.

  • @fraserconnell21
    @fraserconnell21 2 года назад +9

    Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 ♥️ 🚜🦬🦬🙏💪💪💪

  • @acchaladka
    @acchaladka 2 года назад +10

    Good enough for the US White House and Capitol you say? Then it's maybe good enough to protect the leader of the free world, Volodymir Zelensky.

    • @spudm595
      @spudm595 2 года назад +1

      Would everybody come to the rescue if he wasn't part of the Chosen tribe

    • @MonroeSim
      @MonroeSim 2 года назад

      @W Richardson Putin would simply flex his muscles and your car would go tumbling

    • @D.Frasure
      @D.Frasure Год назад +1

      Why can't we give them something to hit Moscow?? I want to see long range from Ukraine. bring down hell like Russia is doing to the good citizens of Ukraine. I want to see Moscow in shambles for what they have done.

  • @wolf5rain
    @wolf5rain Год назад +1

    Every nation has the privilege to protect its own land.

  • @nellwhite5659
    @nellwhite5659 2 года назад +6

    like a Norse god protecting its ground

  • @ricardoromero3065
    @ricardoromero3065 2 года назад +1

    Ese sistema lo tiene Chile, es extremadamente preciso.

  • @sanjayclassesengsst7925
    @sanjayclassesengsst7925 2 года назад +7

    The US and the west after all provided large number of weapons, only if they did slowly, hesitatingly Even a quarter of as many weapons sent to Ukraine in the first 30 days could have many times as useful

    • @lukea9873
      @lukea9873 2 года назад +3

      do u know how expensive miltary equipment is? usually it is sold not just given for free lol

    • @rolandxor179
      @rolandxor179 2 года назад

      Hundreds of billions of Russian assets have been frozen and no doubt in a future settlement some of that will be used to cover the cost and damages made by Russia in Ukraine.

    • @apolloaero
      @apolloaero 2 года назад

      The US has a history of giving weapons to lost causes that abandon post and let the enemy take all the weapons and equipment.
      Ukraine proved they won't just sit there and fought brave and hard. That's why they're getting all of these weapons for free

  • @dt6653
    @dt6653 2 года назад +5

    These should have been sent at the beginning of the invasion. But better later than never. I have been hoping for the US C-RAM, but maybe these are better?

    • @Garyganeu
      @Garyganeu Год назад +1

      They need the c ram for drones mainly. A lot less expensive to use then the Aim missile.

    • @dt6653
      @dt6653 Год назад

      @@Garyganeu C-RAM could have stopped many of those Iranian drones.

  • @daniel_keen
    @daniel_keen 2 года назад +3

    Thank you! 🇺🇦❤️🌎

  • @ShemahIsraelPresbIaco
    @ShemahIsraelPresbIaco 2 года назад +15

    We are all Ukrainians! To the victory against the Russian agressor! Ukraine forever!

    • @231jopancho
      @231jopancho 2 года назад

      Excellent now you will be sent to the frontline since all people of color are not allowed to leave and forced to fight.

    • @spudm595
      @spudm595 2 года назад

      Wrong even your own president is Israeli I had a laugh with him and Boris in an Orthodox church kissing the crucifix and lighting candles and the both of them Jewish

  • @IMeanMachine101
    @IMeanMachine101 2 года назад +3

    Pretty cool

  • @allanfoster6965
    @allanfoster6965 2 года назад +5

    The Ukrainian's are getting to play with all the new toys! Good on em!

    • @ssss9551
      @ssss9551 2 года назад

      @@spudm595 Of course they will, why not?

    • @sababugs1125
      @sababugs1125 2 года назад

      @@spudm595 they will

  • @ericksonmontalbo7995
    @ericksonmontalbo7995 2 года назад +2

    very useful in ukraine country.continue supplying that anti air missile,and ukraine will have chance to win

  • @easttexassplendor9670
    @easttexassplendor9670 Год назад +1

    There is a physician in Texas that wrote a high tech thriller called Ghost Platoon. It is a great read about 2 marines that invent a platoon based weapon system of quadcopters strapped to their backs which serve as recon and targeting platforms. They go in under an unjammable umbrella of eLORAN which is electronically enhanced WWII tower technology. This system is in use and kicking major ass. It would be cool if someone would review the book. Worth my 8 bucks or whatever.

    • @dennisraymond2540
      @dennisraymond2540 Год назад

      You're absolutely right... Good afternoon how are you doing over there hope you're having a wonderful day, it's a lovely day that the lord has made.

  • @michaelmcginn7260
    @michaelmcginn7260 2 года назад

    Nice. Step by step.

  • @evanguillen6805
    @evanguillen6805 2 года назад +4

    Good job USA and Ukraine

  • @petersterling5334
    @petersterling5334 2 года назад +3

    Great News! Ukraine is Really gonna start kicking some Serious Russian Axx!! Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦

  • @80-80.
    @80-80. 2 года назад +3

    Beautiful weapon 🤩

    • @spudm595
      @spudm595 2 года назад +2

      The time they get to the Battlefield and that if they get to the Battlefield by losing 2 to 300 soldiers a day there will be nobody there to use them

  • @sidharth7522
    @sidharth7522 2 года назад +2

    Basically an area defense patriot system.

    • @itsma._ttt
      @itsma._ttt 2 года назад +3

      Basically better than patriot

    • @itsma._ttt
      @itsma._ttt 2 года назад +2

      @Edka Poik I served in 1ADA and I know how bad it is. It was built to intercept old MiG’s, and a couple of Scuds. There’s no way it can survive todays threats unless there’s been off the hood upgrades done which I doubt to somehow make it stand. The MIM’s time has come to and end, and the department hasn’t reached out newer mobile solutions since they are focused on HGV interception using Aegis Block II I guess.

  • @Foxyfreedom
    @Foxyfreedom 2 года назад +4

    It’s about time NATO implemented a “no-fly” zone

    • @jacksonteller1337
      @jacksonteller1337 2 года назад

      Impossible the confrontation with the Russian Federation would wipe out their air force and air defense systems in one afternoon but it will lead to a fifty fifty chance of Russia launching. Than we would all glow in the dark.

  • @Cotictimmy
    @Cotictimmy 2 года назад +6

    My brother said "It didn't stop the North Koreans hitting The White House in 'Olympus Has Fallen'. 🤣

    • @honeybadgerclaw4642
      @honeybadgerclaw4642 2 года назад

      There are 2 white houses in US. The Korean got confused, they hit the wrong target, it belong to president elected by Hollywood.

  • @davidpickens3117
    @davidpickens3117 2 года назад +12

    I thank the GOOD LORD, that a lot of countries have stepped up to help support the Ukraine in their conflict with Russia. I bet Putin never imagined this happening. My guess, is that it DEEPLY KILLS HIM TO SEE THIS HAPPENING. GOD BLESS THE UKRAINE 🇺🇦 AND ALL THE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT HAVE HELPED SUPPORT THEM THROUGH ALL OF THIS

    • @epoxy1710
      @epoxy1710 2 года назад

      Lol, Russia has destroyed most of them.

    • @leonteflorinel8808
      @leonteflorinel8808 2 года назад

      They already have over 100K dead in Slava Kokaine ! You want more dead?

    • @D.Frasure
      @D.Frasure Год назад

      Why can't we give them something to hit Moscow?? I want to see long range from Ukraine. bring down hell like Russia is doing to the good citizens of Ukraine. I want to see Moscow in shambles for what they have done.

  • @kentonian
    @kentonian 2 года назад +1

    I think we need to ramp up production of all advanced weapons and loan them to Ukraine asap. The sooner Russia realise a that it’s invasion is doomed the better. More lives will be saved and much of the weaponry can be returned. Any long range systems can be signed over as on hire to Ukraine and at this stage we call Russias bluff.
    The only real serious consideration is an invasion of Taiwan. As long as we can counter that the maximum help should be given to Ukraine asap.

  • @sonnex1003
    @sonnex1003 2 года назад +1

    Thank you 🇺🇲🇺🇦

  • @rbstevns1534
    @rbstevns1534 2 года назад +2

    Anti air missiles love going up, going down not so much

  • @jamesbohlman4297
    @jamesbohlman4297 2 года назад

    That is good news, send more missile batteries.

  • @philliphsieh83
    @philliphsieh83 Год назад +2

    Watch out for projectile missiles. No one wants to deflate…. $82 bucks for a bad haircut!

  • @benbrice4032
    @benbrice4032 2 года назад +2

    Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦💪💪💪🇺🇦

  • @stischer47
    @stischer47 2 года назад +10

    I have seen a computer simulation of their use against 12, 24, and 48 Russian cruise missiles launched at once against a city: 12 - all destroyed, 24 - all destroyed, 48 - over half destroyed. Inasmuch as Russia doesn't launch such large scale (12, 24, or 48) cruise missile attacks, they should be extremely effective wherever they are deployed.

    • @NVidea-yz1fg
      @NVidea-yz1fg 2 года назад +3

      Don't call what the "Grim Reapers" do on their YT channel an (accurate) simulation, pls.

    • @HOLOD48551
      @HOLOD48551 2 года назад +3

      '' computer simulation '' and reality is different

    • @imjashingyou3461
      @imjashingyou3461 2 года назад

      DCS is very innacurate to reality and the Grim Reapers are an entertainment channel, that run "scenarios" to provide structure to content. They don't use real tactics, and they have thier own biases.

    • @imjashingyou3461
      @imjashingyou3461 2 года назад +1

      @@HOLOD48551 he didn't watch a simulation. He watched a RUclips channel play DCS.

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 2 года назад +1

      Please tell me this isn't based on a Grim Reapers DCS video... Oh god, where's the face palm emoji when you need it!?

  • @gimigimi1299
    @gimigimi1299 2 года назад +1

    Ukraine need 100 of these to intercept all obsolete russian made flying objects.

  • @rbstevns1534
    @rbstevns1534 2 года назад

    Ukraine needs 20 of these

  • @dirkmagurk7086
    @dirkmagurk7086 2 года назад +5

    Fcku RUSSIA!

  • @philipcooper4375
    @philipcooper4375 2 года назад +1

    Romania should have this system also

  • @sarcasmo57
    @sarcasmo57 2 года назад

    Some fast rockets there.

  • @dproulx222
    @dproulx222 2 года назад +1

    I would like Ukraine to be supplied with the following equipment at a minimum:
    50 M142 HIMARS 90 km GMLRS & 300 KM ATACMS ($1 Billion)
    200 K9 South Korean Thunder Tracked Howitzers - Built in Poland + Logistics & Servicing ($2 Billion)
    200 K2 South Korean Black PantherTanks - Poland Logistics & Servicing ($2 Billion) - Less expensive than M1 Abrams Tanks
    200 K239 South Korean Chunmoo MLRS - 80 km - 200 km ($2 Billion) - Less expensive than HIMARS
    2 THAAD ($1.6 Billion)
    10 NASAMS Platoons - Anti Aircraft Systems ($500,000,000)
    1,000 Humvees / 1,000 IFV JLTV
    Drones - Unlimited (S/M/L) Short, Medium & Long distance
    Stugna-P 5,000 - Ukrainian Made - Exported to Baltics & Poland ($1 Billion)
    Javelins (FGM-148) including rockets 5,000 pieces ($2,500,000,000)
    NLAW 10,000
    2,000 Piorun MANPADS - Polish for logistical reasons and more advanced than U.S. Stingers
    FA-50 South Korean Fighter Jets - Same as Poland made in South Korea 50 Jets - ($2.6 Billion)
    20 Neptune Coastal Defense Systems - 280 KM Range
    200 Japanese Type 16 105mm/52-calibre 8x8 Wheeled Self-Propelled Howitzers - Less expensive than French Ceasars and probably better supply chain and servicing + standard NATO ammunition round.

    • @ungemusk2242
      @ungemusk2242 2 года назад +1

      They have it. Still active from today 😊

  • @veronicalogotheti5416
    @veronicalogotheti5416 2 года назад

    It looks good

  • @PzkpfwV
    @PzkpfwV 2 года назад +12

    Having so many different weapons systems has to be a nightmare for logistics.

    • @spudm595
      @spudm595 2 года назад

      They don't care because they're making a fortune selling them on the black market

    • @notjimmy6822
      @notjimmy6822 2 года назад

      Would be intesting to see articles on how the ukranians manage this or the lack of managing it.

    • @MonroeSim
      @MonroeSim 2 года назад

      The US is the king of logistics brother

  • @manuelteixeira2496
    @manuelteixeira2496 Год назад

    Strong

  • @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
    @Whatisthisstupidfinghandle 2 года назад +18

    Very interesting that it contains technology from Patriot and uses standard air to air missiles that nato fighter jets also uses.

    • @john_in_phoenix
      @john_in_phoenix 2 года назад +1

      They also use a derivative of the radar for counter-battery artillery work. The original Patriot radar is still superior, but requires the equivalent of an 18 wheeler transport, plus a really significant electrical generator. This would be the short range radar.

    • @jacksonteller1337
      @jacksonteller1337 2 года назад

      I guess they were inspired by the Spyder system from Israel. They did a similar design only a combination of short and medium range air-to-air missiles.

    • @john_in_phoenix
      @john_in_phoenix 2 года назад +1

      @@jacksonteller1337 The newest missiles are not actually air to air missiles, but actually evolved sea sparrow engine with the latest AMRAAM seeker head. Considerably longer range that way since the engine was designed to be launched from a ship. The seeker accepts course corrections until it gets in range for the radar in the seeker to acquire the target.

    • @jacksonteller1337
      @jacksonteller1337 2 года назад +1

      @@john_in_phoenix the Spyder uses a similar booster system but it does have the AA missiles on them. But my expertise is in destroying these kinds of systems from the air not in how they work but what their weaknesses are. Just got back from Bulgaria a few weeks ago to keep an eye on the Russian aircraft and air defense systems.

  • @de0509
    @de0509 2 года назад

    Wow they turned air to air missile to be launched from surface. Anyone here has the knowledge to say whether its good or bad? I was wondering about the range tho, since it will be forced to spend energy to go up, right?

  • @chrisrodgers6084
    @chrisrodgers6084 2 года назад

    No extended range version say 83 miles?

  • @verdebusterAP
    @verdebusterAP 2 года назад +3

    With this , Russian aircraft and missile will be completely shut down

    • @Telechronic
      @Telechronic 2 года назад +1

      That would be nice!

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 2 года назад +2

      No. Just no... this is not designed to be an anti-ballistic missile system. It is an effective medium range system against aircraft. It will serve as a great area denial tool, but it won't stop long-range, stand-off attacks. Nor will Ukraine have enough to cover all the gaps.
      Don't be so hyperbolic.

    • @NorwegianCollector_
      @NorwegianCollector_ Месяц назад

      @@stephengilmore2741You are completely wrong 😂
      NASAM was created to defends against unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), helicopters, cruise missiles, unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs), and fixed wing aircraft

  • @nisckographics9408
    @nisckographics9408 2 года назад

    first time hearing about this system

  • @PREDATOR-ALI
    @PREDATOR-ALI 2 года назад +1

    This Weapon f+ck Warcriminals Jets 💪

  • @nannunbgd
    @nannunbgd 2 года назад

    Romania have NASAMS?

  • @kyanospegasus5612
    @kyanospegasus5612 2 года назад

    I think its really reliable

  • @ReneChewbaka
    @ReneChewbaka 2 года назад +1

    The technical information in this video is erroneous ... Ukraine is currently using the NASAMS system with a missile range of up to 190km or approximately 100 miles...

  • @StPiter111
    @StPiter111 2 года назад

    3000°C and 2000 bar:

  • @aleccap5946
    @aleccap5946 2 года назад

    Where's that come from ? Clearly never had it in February

  • @DeadsupraEE3
    @DeadsupraEE3 2 года назад

    can someone explain the Chile one?

  • @dirkaminimo4836
    @dirkaminimo4836 5 месяцев назад

    Not long range in current deployment. At most med range

  • @AnhTrieu90
    @AnhTrieu90 2 года назад

    Must be good! They’re proud enough to put their country’s name behind.

  • @fernandocorreia5096
    @fernandocorreia5096 2 года назад

    Go ahead Ukraine ! For freedom and democracy!

    • @fernandocorreia5096
      @fernandocorreia5096 2 года назад

      @Edka Poik criminal PUTIN to a court to be sentenced for life

    • @fernandocorreia5096
      @fernandocorreia5096 2 года назад

      INTERNATIONAL AMNESTY HAVE ALREADY SAID THAT RÚSSIA COMMITED A LOT OF WAR CRIMES

  • @ronibark5804
    @ronibark5804 2 года назад

    We think of the Russia-Ukraine war as a local conflict, but it is much more than that; it is a global war on multiple fronts. The war is not only a military conflict; it is also an economic war of attrition. With skyrocketing gas prices and shortage of staples, people all over the world are feeling the consequences of the war.
    This war is transforming the entire modus operandi of humanity. Since the dawn of time, we have been accustomed to living by the motto, “survival of the fittest.” By and large, the rule was that the strong determined the rules, and the rules were often abusive toward the weak. Now, it seems like a new mindset has set in: Wanting something and being strong enough to take it does not mean that the world will accept it.
    The war, therefore, is being fought on the inside no less, and perhaps more than on the outside. Our very makeup is changing from abusive to cooperative, from narcissistic to altruistic.
    It hurts, and it will not happen without a struggle, but it is irreversible. This is the path of our evolution toward the purpose of our creation-to encompass within us all of creation. To do that, we must come to care for it, just as a mother encompasses her child through her maternal love.
    The struggle to transition from our current uncaring and mean approach to all creations but ourselves, into wise and compassionate beings is called “the war of Gog and Magog” or Armageddon.
    Since the war is about our inner makeup, we can fight it within us. If we object to struggling with ourselves over who will rule-the ego or love-the physical reality will force us to choose love nonetheless. However, it will do so by hurting us in a very physical way.
    The war in Eastern Europe is nothing compared to what we might have to endure if we resist the process. The horrific descriptions of our sages and prophets hint at it, and we would not want to live through it.
    Alternatively, we can fight this war within us without firing a single bullet. The choice is in our hands. All we need is to continue in the same direction that nature is already leading us: toward connection. If we make an effort to care for one another, even though initially we don’t, then we are moving in the right direction. If we try to resolve conflicts not with guns or even legal battles, but by strengthening the care and friendship between us, then we are saving lives and sparing torments from countless people.
    In conclusion, let us try to rise above the hatred and see the human on the other side, who suffers too. Let us think that this war was given to us so we would think about each other more than we have so far. After all, were it not for this war, we would not notice one another. Now that it is here, we are no longer indifferent. Although our feelings our currently negative, now that we are aware of them, we can work on them together and turn them around. These are the wars of the Messiah who moshech [Hebrew: pulls] us out of the ego, and into mutual love.

  • @MilitaryMatters1
    @MilitaryMatters1 2 года назад

    Daaaamn now that’s a SAM lol. I can tell you for sure that the AIM 120 seriously fu***s shi** up when it pitbulls. Haven’t been on the receiving end of one but I imagine it isn’t fun. But in combination with the AIM 9X?? Once that target closes in, after spending energy and countermeasures trying to outrun the AIM120- the 9X will close in and seal the deal at Mach 2.5+

  • @czerbniak75
    @czerbniak75 Год назад

    Ludmiła się denerwuje bo jest z Kijowa i tam zostawiła dwoje dzieci i co ja jej mam powiedzieć, że Ruscy przeciążyli system. Co najwyżej można po nie wysłać do Kijowa samolot, z Kabulu wywieźliśmy całe schronisko dla psów do Anglii, taki ten łysy angielski minister obrony łapał się za głowę. No ale Ludmiła myśli tak, że jak one mają studiować na Ukrainie to lepiej, żeby tam chodziły do szkoły. Jak Ty myślisz Agnieszka?

  • @davidlilley2736
    @davidlilley2736 2 года назад

    Sorry to ask on hear but have they stopped this channel im I have sky Q and its vanished from the TV guide I went through them all but couldn't see it ? I was really enjoying chips and many others

  • @lasulupaulasulu2781
    @lasulupaulasulu2781 Год назад +1

    Yeah but fail in dubai to protect oil

  • @dnmurphy48
    @dnmurphy48 2 года назад +1

    Well the more the better, but don't cruise missiles flow low ?

    • @Husker5454
      @Husker5454 2 года назад +5

      These can easily intercept low flying targets , pretty much all SAM's can , the reason jets and such fly low when avoiding sams is to they have the ability to use terrain like trees , hills and such to block line of sight from incoming missiles , Cruise missiles do not have that ability and will just fly to the target which makes them susceptible to pretty much any air defense .

    • @Mr.mysterious76
      @Mr.mysterious76 2 года назад

      Yes, they can flewed low

    • @Husker5454
      @Husker5454 2 года назад

      @Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler ? what got lost in translation this is a US weapon , this is what protects the whitehouse its not Ukrainian its US giving them to ukraine .

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 2 года назад +1

      @Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler His English wasn't perfect, but it's more than understandable. What about it did you not understand? In short: cruise missiles can't constantly adjust altitude to avoid trees/buildings/hills etc - they fly at a constant altitude, let's say 500ft, which is still high enough to shoot down. They also don't fly as fast as people seem to think - maybe 450kts? Or less?

    • @Husker5454
      @Husker5454 2 года назад

      @Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler what ?

  • @2.Cuzzzz
    @2.Cuzzzz 2 года назад +1

    i did not know it was Norwegian

    • @daginn896
      @daginn896 2 года назад

      Swedes have little knowledge of Norway, or Denmark for that matter.

    • @NorwegianCollector_
      @NorwegianCollector_ Месяц назад

      Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System = NASAM

  • @eks1212
    @eks1212 2 года назад

    is it proven in the real battle like the iron dome ?

    • @KingSpittusFactus
      @KingSpittusFactus 2 года назад +1

      whats the difference between a target drone and a plane for that system?

    • @croci81
      @croci81 2 года назад

      Missiles that it shoots are combat-proven.

  • @GG-du6go
    @GG-du6go 2 года назад

    Since ukraine produces and exports so much things, how did they end up in this situation where they don't have a properly funded military. Y didn't they ensure that corruption didn't hinder their defensive capabilities?

  • @sukaseummongkhun2377
    @sukaseummongkhun2377 2 года назад

    💙💛Slava Ukraine💙💛💙💛Slava Ukraine💙💛

  • @Rat-nl1xe
    @Rat-nl1xe 2 года назад

    Sounds harsh but all these new weapons are getting tested hopefully they Do what it says on the tin.

    • @stephengilmore2741
      @stephengilmore2741 2 года назад +2

      It is not a 'new' weapon - AMRAAMs are tried and tested. It is simply an integration into a land-based launcher system. There is no reason to think it wouldn't be effective. The latest versions of AIM-120s are the most capable medium range air-to-air missiles around.

  • @petertyson4022
    @petertyson4022 2 года назад

    They only sending 2.

  • @FPJDK
    @FPJDK 2 года назад

    Why is it in use in Chile? 🤔

  • @andrealves5779
    @andrealves5779 2 года назад

    Já ta bom todo dia .EXPLODÍNDO 15 VEÍCULOS DA RÚSSÍA .ÍNCLUÍNDO CAÇS.TAQS E SOLDADOS

  • @CMANATIS
    @CMANATIS 2 года назад

    Bravo USA ! Slava Ukraini! God protect you !

  • @CHMichael
    @CHMichael 2 года назад

    Did no one sell them equipment like this 3y ago or did they not want to spend the money?

    • @guyb7995
      @guyb7995 2 года назад

      No one sold it too them, they didn't have an apparent need for them at the time and the probably didn't have the money for them given they were pleading for even just Javelins from the US when Trump was trying to hold them back from Ukraine as a bribe for 'Trump'ed up BS on his political opponents son.

  • @gandigooglegandigoogle7202
    @gandigooglegandigoogle7202 2 года назад +1

    plein le cul de ces pubs..sans cesse sans cesse

  • @gplusgplus2286
    @gplusgplus2286 2 года назад +1

    You cant protect against $20,000 drones with $2,000,000 missiles.

    • @guyb7995
      @guyb7995 2 года назад

      You can, but more effective is to protect against a $3-$6.5 million cruise missile or a $35 million dollar aircraft with a $0.5-$1million dollar missile. Not to mention the saving of property damage and of course priceless lives.

    • @NorwegianCollector_
      @NorwegianCollector_ Месяц назад

      The fact that you only mention the drone is hilarious 😂 it can do a lot more then that my friend and money has no meaning in a full scale war.
      NASAMS can fire 3 types of missiles with different range.
      It can hit a SU-54, Mil Mi-54, KA 54 or a Russian cruise missile clean out of the sky.

  • @rickc661
    @rickc661 2 года назад

    hopefully not 4 . or the 10 units NATO seems to brag about. crew training is the obvious, gotta speed up training, like 4 x not by dribbles.

  • @rerspss
    @rerspss 2 года назад

    That thing should be mobile!

  • @karloyu3484
    @karloyu3484 2 года назад

    👍

  • @drbrandvoll
    @drbrandvoll 2 года назад +1

    Too little too late again im afraid

  • @manaytatay256
    @manaytatay256 2 года назад

    Worst decision for Russia to invade Ukraine and make a 100 thousand years of neighbor opponent

  • @rlstang7276
    @rlstang7276 2 года назад

    Good for Ukrainians

  • @richardkudrna7503
    @richardkudrna7503 2 года назад

    So those bombers launching missiles are 10x out of range or more.
    Ukraine needs a longer range SAM to force Russia to launch farther back and reducing hit success.

    • @sergevandyck
      @sergevandyck 2 года назад

      Oui mais ces missile peuvent détruire ceux envoyés par les bombardiers Russes.

    • @richardkudrna7503
      @richardkudrna7503 2 года назад

      @@sergevandyck
      Only to 32 km
      The bombers fly much farther away when they launch
      Ukraine needs a system with much more range. They have old Buk which I think is more than 32 km but Ukraine needs 300 km.

    • @richardkudrna7503
      @richardkudrna7503 2 года назад

      @@sergevandyck
      I realize now you meant interception of inbound missiles.
      I’m not sure how capable this system is for supersonic inbound (some kalibre versions have a supersonic terminal phase), but I’m sure it has good capability in striking cruise missiles in the subsonic phase. I wonder how capable it is against ballistic missiles attacking from extreme altitude.

  • @kwharrison6668
    @kwharrison6668 2 года назад +1

    “Can fire AIM-9X and AIM-120”- Immediately proceeds to show launch of ESSM missile from launcher 🤣. NASAMS is an incredibly versatile short to mid-range SAM. Any idea if the AIM-9 and 120 are what Ukraine’s going to be given to fire from it? It can take take a pretty wide range of missile types.

  • @nguyenho5859
    @nguyenho5859 2 года назад

    It ain’t free mind you

  • @alfisarabi5877
    @alfisarabi5877 2 года назад

    those weapons who build by those intelligent people are the tools to vanish humanity and the world,,if didn't use for good purpose...

  • @richyp64
    @richyp64 2 года назад

    I support the current thing. 👏👏👏

  • @IceBreaker.22
    @IceBreaker.22 2 года назад +1

    Game changer for sure! 🤣🤣🤣

  • @NIKLAS614
    @NIKLAS614 2 года назад

    It got lost in space in a 5 sec. 🙉