The courts should make a chart with a scale of 0-10 with different reasons for just cause and their severity. They should keep that chart confidential from the employers and employees but use it to decide court cases based on the facts they hear in a particular case. They cannot let the employers decide what is considered just cause for termination. There should be a similar chart for "harassment" as well.
Have you seen the movie Titanic? In that movie, at one point, Rose says no to Jack but Jack tries to convince her one more time because he did not want to give up on the woman he loved so easily. That should be a human right. Your employer cannot stop you from falling in love with a coworker or for trying to woo her unless he/she clearly voices her objections specifically in that regard. Need I remind you that we live in a country where sex education is taught in schools at an early age? So why when it comes to workplace, people are so quick to judge everything as harassment?
Lawpro appears to protect them from accountability, apparently, perpetuating discrimination, forcing lawyers to undermine their rules of conduct, mislead the publics, lie to the courts, etc. this video is a straw man, this lawyer is fully aware of the issues.
I do not believe what these lawyers are talking about. My complaints to the HRTO are still lingering without a chance to be heard by the Tribunal's Hearing process for the past seven years. Even after being represented by lawyers who were believed to have been the best in the practice, policy makers, advisors. After spending thousands of dollars as legal fees, there still is no finality to my files to the time I wrote this comment. I think it is very shameful to all parties especially, to the HRTO, the province, and to the country in general. application
The courts should make a chart with a scale of 0-10 with different reasons for just cause and their severity. They should keep that chart confidential from the employers and employees but use it to decide court cases based on the facts they hear in a particular case. They cannot let the employers decide what is considered just cause for termination. There should be a similar chart for "harassment" as well.
1. Consider using a teleprompter. 2 think about eye lines when you’re on tv, ie, looking at whomever is speaking etc.
Have you seen the movie Titanic? In that movie, at one point, Rose says no to Jack but Jack tries to convince her one more time because he did not want to give up on the woman he loved so easily. That should be a human right. Your employer cannot stop you from falling in love with a coworker or for trying to woo her unless he/she clearly voices her objections specifically in that regard. Need I remind you that we live in a country where sex education is taught in schools at an early age? So why when it comes to workplace, people are so quick to judge everything as harassment?
What if a magistrate breach our right
Lawpro appears to protect them from accountability, apparently, perpetuating discrimination, forcing lawyers to undermine their rules of conduct, mislead the publics, lie to the courts, etc. this video is a straw man, this lawyer is fully aware of the issues.
Doesn’t lawpro undermine all of this, by incentivizing discrimination?
I do not believe what these lawyers are talking about.
My complaints to the HRTO are still lingering without a chance to be heard by the Tribunal's Hearing process for the past seven years. Even after being represented by lawyers who were believed to have been the best in the practice, policy makers, advisors. After spending thousands of dollars as legal fees, there still is no finality to my files to the time I wrote this comment.
I think it is very shameful to all parties especially, to the HRTO, the province, and to the country in general.
application