The pitch focused too much on the logic and had little focus on the recommendation. I think the CEO would be bored hearing the work process. Instead it should start with the summary, mention the root-causes and explain in detail what should be done both in the short term and the long term
1) It is quantitate issue tree and he speaks about qualitative. 2)He should speak brunch by branch, sub-branch by sub-branch. 3) There are no strong recommendation for client. 4) He tells in the end that different framework needed. 5) Seems not MECE
One thing to note: many issue trees start quantitative but switches to qualitative near the end. Quantitative breakdowns works better at the start when you need to locate a rough area for investigation, but to pinpoint the root cause you'd usually need qualitative breakdowns.
The final was very long, cramming too many details in it. Jargon-filled language without a clear and concise solution. "Mr CEO" might have lost interest
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Don't hesitate to reach out other peers to practice case interview for free: mconsultingprep.com/case-partner
What was wrong with the initial final pitch: Did not lead with the answer, information overload (not succinct)
The pitch at 1:27 is full of unnecessary details, focusing less on forward path and the solution itself.
Great video. thank you
Glad you find it useful. Join our community to learn more insights about case interview with MBB peers and our coach: discord.gg/tqAjCbxvxs
Here is the wrong pitch " double down the product " does it makes it profitable ?
The pitch focused too much on the logic and had little focus on the recommendation. I think the CEO would be bored hearing the work process. Instead it should start with the summary, mention the root-causes and explain in detail what should be done both in the short term and the long term
THE MOUST IMPORTANT IN AMERICA 🇺🇸 IS FACTORIES 🏭 BACK AND RENOVATION OF INNERCITIES FOR BETTER LIVES
And it should finish with a classic "happy to continue working with you (to implement these solutions)". Great job!
I think there are no numbers in the closing pitch. It’s not described quantitatively. Thanks.
1) It is quantitate issue tree and he speaks about qualitative. 2)He should speak brunch by branch, sub-branch by sub-branch. 3) There are no strong recommendation for client. 4) He tells in the end that different framework needed. 5) Seems not MECE
One thing to note: many issue trees start quantitative but switches to qualitative near the end. Quantitative breakdowns works better at the start when you need to locate a rough area for investigation, but to pinpoint the root cause you'd usually need qualitative breakdowns.
The final was very long, cramming too many details in it. Jargon-filled language without a clear and concise solution. "Mr CEO" might have lost interest